Search

The hyperactivation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is linked to obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes, which are characterized by elevated norepinephrine (NE) levels. Previous research has shown increased sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) protein levels in kidneys of hypertensive rodents, prompting investigation into the expression of SGLT1 in various tissues, such as skeletal muscle. This study aimed to assess (i) whether skeletal muscle cells and tissue express SGLT1 and SGLT2 proteins; (ii) if NE increases SGLT1 levels in skeletal muscle cells, and (iii) whether the skeletal muscle of neurogenically hypertensive mice exhibits increased SGLT1 expression. We found that (i) skeletal muscle cells and tissue are a novel source of the SGLT2 protein and that (ii) NE significantly elevated SGLT1 levels in skeletal muscle cells. As SGLT2 inhibition (SGLT2i) with Empagliflozin increased SGLT1 levels, in vivo studies with the dual inhibitor SGLT1/2i, Sotagliflozin were warranted. The treatment of neurogenically hypertensive mice using Sotagliflozin significantly reduced blood pressure. Our findings suggest that SNS activity upregulates the therapeutic target, SGLT1, in skeletal muscle, potentially worsening cardiometabolic control. As clinical trial data suggest cardiorenal benefits from SGLT2i, future studies should aim to utilize SGLT1i by itself, which may offer a therapeutic strategy for conditions with heightened SNS activity, such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity.

Background: Renal denervation is a recognized adjunct therapy for hypertension with clinically significant blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Long-term follow-up data are critical to ascertain durability of the effect and safety. Aside from the 36-month follow-up data available from randomized control trials, recent cohort analyses extended follow-up out to 10 years. We sought to analyze study-level data and quantify the ambulatory BP reduction of renal denervation across contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials and available long-term follow-up data up to 10 years from observational studies., Methods: A systematic review was performed with data from 4 observational studies with follow-up out to 10 years and 2 randomized controlled trials meeting search and inclusion criteria with follow-up data out to 36 months. Study-level data were extracted and compared statistically., Results: In 2 contemporary randomized controlled trials with 36-month follow-up, an average sham-adjusted ambulatory systolic BP reduction of -12.7±4.5 mm Hg from baseline was observed ( P =0.05). Likewise, a -14.8±3.4 mm Hg ambulatory systolic BP reduction was found across observational studies with a mean long-term follow-up of 7.7±2.8 years (range, 3.5-9.4 years; P =0.0051). The observed reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate across the long-term follow-up was in line with the predicted age-related decline. Antihypertensive drug burden was similar at baseline and follow-up., Conclusions: Renal denervation is associated with a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in ambulatory systolic BP in both contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials up to 36 months and observational cohort studies up to 10 years without adverse consequences on renal function., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.P. Schlaich has received support from a National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowship and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, and Servier Australia. He serves on scientific advisory boards for Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Novartis, and Medtronic. A. Walton is a Proctor for Medtronic and Abbott, is on the Medical Advisory Board of Medtronic, and receives grant support from Medtronic, Abbott, and Edwards. M.D. Esler and G.W. Lambert have received consulting fees and travel and research support from Medtronic. The other authors report no conflicts.

Single-pill combination therapy containing four quarter-dose medications for high blood pressure improves BP control compared to monotherapy, however patient-reported acceptance of the quadpill as a treatment strategy remains undescribed. We collected within-trial feedback and interviewed participants from the quadruple ultra-low-dose treatment for hypertension (QUARTET) trial to characterise patient attitudes to this intervention. All trial participants were asked about ease and preference for the quadpill and provided an opportunity to give further comments on the trial at 12 weeks (trial primary endpoint) and 52 weeks extended follow-up. Separately, we used purposive and quota sampling for the semi-structured telephone interviews, with the resultant verbatim transcripts analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Themes were re-evaluated after each successive interview, and at suspected data saturation, an additional interview conducted for confirmation. At 12 weeks follow-up, 502 of 591 (85%) participants responded to acceptability questions, and 359 of 417 (86%) responded at week 52. Most reported the trial capsule easy or very easy to take. From eight sites, 16 participants were interviewed between 5 August 2020 and 19 November 2020. All described a positive experience, preferred once-daily morning dosing and found routine facilitated adherence. Participants valued individual responsibility for adherence, and involvement of the general practitioner in blood-pressure management. Most reported capsule size did not deter adherence but desired a smaller capsule. Participants described a preference for minimising number and dosage of medications, reduced capsule size, and once-daily morning dosing. These findings suggest a preference for single-pill combination therapy for blood pressure lowering., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The importance of the sympathetic nervous system in essential hypertension has been recognized in 2 eras. The first was in early decades of the 20 th century, through to the 1960s. Here, the sympathetic nervous system was identified as a target for the treatment of hypertension, and an extensive range of antiadrenergic therapies were developed. Then, after a period of lapsed interest, in a second era from 1985 on, the development of precise measures of human sympathetic nerve firing and transmitter release allowed demonstration of the importance of neural mechanisms in the initiation and maintenance of the arterial blood pressure elevation in hypertension. This led to the development of a device treatment of hypertension, catheter-based renal denervation, which we will discuss., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.D. Esler and J.W. Osborn have received consulting fees and travel and research support from Medtronic. M.P. Schlaich has received research support from Medtronic, Abbott, and Servier Australia. He serves on scientific advisory boards for Abbott, BI, Servier, Novartis, and Medtronic.

Background: A combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure (BP) medications lowered office BP more effectively than initial monotherapy in the QUARTET trial. The effects on average ambulatory BP changes at 12 weeks have not yet been reported in detail., Methods: Adults with hypertension who were untreated or on monotherapy were eligible for participation. Overall, 591 participants were randomized to either the quadpill (irbesartan 37.5 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg) or monotherapy control (irbesartan 150 mg). The difference in 24-h, daytime, and night-time systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP at 12 weeks along further metrics were predefined secondary outcomes., Results: Of 576 participants, 289 were randomized to the quadpill group and 287 to the monotherapy group. At 12 weeks, mean 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP were 7.7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 9.6-5.8] and 5.3 (95% CI: 6.5-4.1) mmHg lower in the quadpill vs. monotherapy group ( P  < 0.001 for both). Similar reductions in the quadpill group were observed for daytime (8.1/5.7 mmHg lower) and night-time (6.3/4.0 mmHg lower) BP at 12 weeks (all P  < 0.001) compared to monotherapy. The rate of BP control (24-h average BP < 130/80 mmHg) at 12 weeks was higher in the quadpill group (77 vs. 50%; P  < 0.001). The reduction in BP load was also more pronounced with the quadpill., Conclusion: A quadruple quarter-dose combination compared with monotherapy resulted in greater ambulatory BP lowering across the entire 24-h period with higher ambulatory BP control rates and reduced BP variability at 12 weeks. These findings further substantiate the efficacy of an ultra-low-dose quadpill-based BP lowering strategy., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hypertension is often linked with metabolic risk factors that share common pathophysiological pathways. Despite wide-spread availability of multiple drug classes, optimal blood pressure (BP) control remains challenging. Increased central sympathetic outflow is frequently neglected as a critical regulator of both circulatory and metabolic pathways and often remains unopposed therapeutically. Selective imidazoline receptor agonists (SIRAs) effectively reduce BP with a favorable side effect profile compared with older centrally acting antihypertensive drugs. Hard outcome data in hypertension, such as prevention of stroke, heart and kidney diseases, are not available with SIRAs. However, in direct comparisons, SIRAs were as effective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics in lowering BP. Other beneficial effects on metabolic parameters in hypertensive patients with concomitant overweight and obesity have been documented with SIRAs. Here we review the existing evidence on the safety and efficacy of moxonidine, a widely available SIRA, compared with common antihypertensive agents and provide a consensus position statement based on inputs from 12 experts from Europe and Australia on SIRAs in hypertension management., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) has been consistently shown in recent sham-controlled clinical trials to reduce blood pressure (BP). Salt sensitivity is a critical factor in hypertension pathogenesis, but cumbersome to assess by gold-standard methodology. Twenty-four-hour average heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) dipping, taken by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), stratifies patients into high, moderate, and low salt sensitivity index (SSI) risk categories., Objectives: We aimed to assess whether ABPM-derived SSI risk could predict the systolic blood pressure reduction at long-term follow-up in a real-world RDN patient cohort., Methods: Sixty participants had repeat ABPM as part of a renal denervation long-term follow-up. Average time since RDN was 8.9 ± 1.2 years. Based on baseline ABPM, participants were stratified into low (HR < 70 bpm and MAP dipping > 10%), moderate (HR ≥70 bpm or MAP dipping ≤ 10%), and high (HR ≥ 70 bpm and MAP dipping ≤ 10%) SSI risk groups, respectively., Results: One-way ANOVA indicated a significant treatment effect ( P  = 0.03) between low ( n  = 15), moderate ( n  = 35), and high ( n  = 10) SSI risk with systolic BP reduction of 9.6 ± 3.7 mmHg, 8.4 ± 3.5 mmHg, and 28.2 ± 9.6 mmHg, respectively. Baseline BP was not significantly different between SSI Risk groups ( P  = 0.18). High SSI risk independently correlated with systolic BP reduction ( P  = 0.02)., Conclusions: Our investigation indicates that SSI risk may be a simple and accessible measure for predicting the BP response to RDN. However, the influence of pharmacological therapy on these participants is an important extraneous variable requiring testing in prospective or drug naive RDN cohorts., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Low-dose combinations are a promising intervention for improving blood pressure (BP) control but their effects on therapeutic inertia are uncertain., Methods: Analysis of 591 patients randomized to an ultra-low-dose quadruple pill or initial monotherapy. The episode of therapeutic inertia was defined as a patient visit with a BP of >140/90 mm Hg without intensification of antihypertensive treatment. We compared the frequency of therapeutic inertia episodes between Quadpill and initial monotherapy as a proportion of the total population (intention-to-treat analysis with the denominator being all participants randomized) and as a proportion of people with uncontrolled BP (with the denominator being participants with uncontrolled BP)., Results: Therapeutic inertia occurred in fewer participants randomized to Quadpill compared with monotherapy. For example, among the 390 participants with a 6-month follow-up, therapeutic inertia according to unattended BP was 21/192 (11%) versus 45/192 (23%), P =0.002. There were similar rates of therapeutic inertia among those with uncontrolled unattended BP in each group (all P >0.4). Consistent observations were seen with the use of attended office BP measures. The major determinants of not intensifying treatment during follow-up were BP readings that were close to target and large improvements in BP compared with the previous visit., Conclusions: Among all treated individuals, low-dose Quadpill reduced the number of therapeutic inertia episodes compared with initial monotherapy. After the first follow-up visit, most high BP values did not lead to treatment intensification in both groups. Education is needed about the importance of treatment intensification despite a significant improvement in BP or BP being close to target., Registration: URL: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=ACTRN12616001144404; Unique identifier: ACTRN12616001144404., Competing Interests: Disclosures The George Institute for Global Health (TGI) has submitted patent applications in respect of low fixed-dose combination products for the treatment of cardiovascular or cardiometabolic disease. A. Rodgers and C. Chow are listed as inventors. A. Rodgers is employed by TGI and seconded part-time to George Medicines Pty Ltd (GM). George Health Enterprises Pty Ltd (GHE) and its subsidiary, GM, have received investment funds to develop fixed-dose combination products, including combinations of blood pressure-lowering drugs. GHE is the social enterprise arm of TGI. A. Rodgers and C. Chow do not have direct financial interests in these patent applications or investments. The other authors report no conflicts.

Two recent large trials showed the potential of single pill combinations (SPCs) with ≥3 low-dose components among people with hypertension who were untreated or receiving monotherapy. In both trials, these 'hypertension polypills' were superior to usual care, achieving >80% BP control without increasing withdrawal due to side effects. However, there are no such products available for prescribers. To address this unmet need, George Medicines developed GMRx2 with telmisartan/amlodipine/indapamide in three strengths (mg): 10/1.25/0.625, 20/2.5/1.25; 40/5/2.5. Two pivotal trials are ongoing to support FDA submission for the treatment of hypertension, including initial treatment. These assess efficacy and safety of GMRx2 compared to: placebo, and each of the three possible dual combinations. Regulatory submissions are planned for 2024, with the aim of providing access to GMRx2 in developed and developing regions. Wider implementation of GMRx2-based treatment strategies will be guided by further research to inform access and appropriate scale up., Competing Interests: Authors Anthony Rodgers, Abdul Salam, Sonali Gnanenthiran and Aletta E Schutte are employed at TGI, which holds an interest in GMRx2 via its ownership of George Health Enterprises. None of the TGI staff have a personal financial interest in GM. Professor Rodgers is seconded part-time to GM. TGI holds patents for ultra-low-dose fixed-dose combination products for the treatment of hypertension and diabetes, and Professor Rodgers is listed as one of the inventors (Granted: US 10,369,15; US 10,799,487; US 10,322,117; US 11,033,544; US 11,478,462; Pending: US 17/932,982; US 18/446,268; US 17/598,122; US 17/317,614; US 17/527,084; US 17/527,085; US 17/527,087). Professor Rodgers does not have a financial interest in these patents. None of the other authors have a financial interest in GM or have received funding for their independent contribution to the GMRx2 program. Aletta E Schutte has received consulting fees and/or speaker honoraria from Omron Healthcare, Aktiia, Medtronic, Servier, Abbott, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Novartis. She is supported by a Fellowship of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (ID 2017504). Dike B. Ojji has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Servier, Swipha and Boehringer for speaking at educational meetings. Krzysztof Narkiewicz has received speaker and consulting honoraria from Bausch Health, Berlin-Chemie/Menarini, Egis, Idorsia, Gedeon Richter, Gilead, Krka, Novo Nordisk, Polpharma, Recordati, Sandoz and Servier. Markus Schlaich has received consulting fees, and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, ReCor, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. He is the current president of Hypertension Australia and Treasurer of the World Hypertension League., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s).)

Efforts to limit the impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic led to the implementation of public health measures and reallocation of health resources. To investigate trends in blood pressure (BP), hypertension and BMI in the Australian population during the COVID-19 pandemic, data from publicly accessible health stations were analyzed. Average BP and BMI measured by the SiSU Health Station network in Australia in over 1.6 million health screenings were compared between the years 2018 and 2021. Additionally, paired trajectories for BP and BMI development before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were calculated. Comparisons between pre-COVID years and post-COVID years of 2018 versus 2020, 2019 versus 2020, 2018 versus 2021, and 2019 versus 2021 showed increases in average adjusted systolic BP of 2.0, 1.7, 2.6, and 2.3 mmHg, respectively. Paired analysis of longitudinal data showed an overall increase in the trajectory of systolic BP of 3.2 mmHg between pre- and post-COVID years. The prevalence of hypertension in users of the health stations increased by approximately 25% in the years 2020-2021. Similar trends were seen for BMI. Data from public Australian health stations indicated a strong trend toward higher BP during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the population level, BP increments have been shown to markedly increase cardiovascular disease risk. Anti-pandemic measures need to be carefully evaluated in terms of secondary public health effects and health support systems extended to effectively target cardiovascular risk., (© 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Herein, we review interventional peripheral neuromodulatory approaches to reduce blood pressure (BP), specifically focusing on catheter-based renal denervation (RDN), as well as the latest data from recent clinical trials underpinning its clinical use. Given the apparent failure of established lifestyle measures and pharmacologic BP-lowering approaches to improve hypertension (HTN) control rates, the past decade has seen remarkable scientific efforts to explore the utility of interventional strategies for BP management. Experimental studies and human clinical trials have demonstrated the crucial role of the sympathetic nervous system in the development and mainenance of HTN - consequently, most recent interventional technologies aimed primarily at modulating neural pathways. Advanced approaches that were rigorously tested in human studies include RDN, endovascular baroreflex amplification, baroreflex activation therapy and cardiac neuromodulation stimulation.Amongst these, RDN is by far the most established technology. With recent robust evidence from clinical trials and real-world data showing the safety and efficacy of both ultrasound and radiofrequency-based approaches, a recent clinical consensus statement of the European Society of Cardiology Council on Hypertension and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions concludes that RDN represents an ancillary therapeutic option in patients with uncontrolled resistant HTN confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure measurement and in spite of attention to lifestyle changes and optimised pharmacological treatment. Furthermore, RDN could alos be considered for patienst unlikley to adhere to or tolerate long-term antihypertensive drug treatment. Very recent data indicate long-term safety and efficacy up to 10 years. Appropriate implementation of RDN into clinical practice is now warranted.For all other interventions additional data from adequately designed human studies are required to establish their safety and clinical utility for potential future use in routine practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MGK has received consulting fees and/or travel and research support from Medtronic. RC is supported by the Australian National Heart Foundation post doc fellowship. CES and SS have been involved in renal denervation studies supported by Medtronic. SS has received consulting fees and/or travel and research support from Medtronic. MS has received consulting fees, and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer and Boehringer-Ingelheim., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications., Objectives: This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of RDN in the presence of antihypertensive medications., Methods: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded trial enrolling patients from 56 clinical centers worldwide. Patients were prescribed 1 to 3 antihypertensive medications. Patients were randomized to radiofrequency RDN or sham control procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP at 6 months between groups using a Bayesian trial design and analysis., Results: The treatment difference in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to 6 months between the RDN group (n = 206; -6.5 ± 10.7 mm Hg) and sham control group (n = 131; -4.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg) was -1.9 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.4 to 0.5 mm Hg; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary efficacy analysis with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.51 (Bayesian treatment difference: -0.03 mm Hg [95% CI: -2.82 to 2.77 mm Hg]). However, there were changes and increases in medication intensity among sham control patients. RDN was associated with a reduction in office systolic BP compared with sham control at 6 months (adjusted treatment difference: -4.9 mm Hg; P = 0.0015). Night-time BP reductions and win ratio analysis also favored RDN. There was 1 adverse safety event among 253 assessed patients., Conclusions: There was no significant difference between groups in the primary analysis. However, multiple secondary endpoint analyses favored RDN over sham control. (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED Study [Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications]; NCT02439775)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by Medtronic. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research/grant support from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Orbus Neich, Teleflex, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions; and has received personal consulting honoraria from Cardiovascular Systems, Inc, Medtronic, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Townsend is a consultant for Medtronic, Cytel, and Janssen. Dr Kario has received personal fees from Medtronic during the conduct of the study; has received grants from A&D Company, Omron Healthcare, Fukuda Denshi, CureApp, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Teijin Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, and Fukuda Lifetec; has received consulting fees from A&D Company, JIMRO, Omron Healthcare, CureApp, Terumo, and Fukuda Denshi; has received honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Omron Healthcare; and has participated on the Advisory Board of Fukuda Denshi, outside of the submitted work. Dr Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219), and Deutsche Herzstiftung; has received scientific support from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical; and has received speaker honoraria/consulting fees from Ablative Solutions, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, Merck, ReCor Medical, Servier, and Terumo. Dr Weber has received consulting fees from Medtronic, ReCor, Ablative Solutions, Johnson and Johnson, and Urovant. Dr Schmieder has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic, Recor, and Ablative Solutions. Dr Pocock has received personal fees from Medtronic outside of the submitted work. Dr Tsioufis has received institutional research/grant support from Medtronic and ReCor Medical; and has received personal consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, ReCor Medical, SERVIER, WinMedica, and ELPEN. Dr Konstantinidis receives payments from Medtronic for work as research center secondary investigator. Dr Choi has received consulting fees from Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. Dr East has received consulting fees from Medtronic. Dr Lauder has received speaker fees and honoraria from Medtronic and ReCor Medical. Dr Cohen has received research support and consultant fees from Medtronic and ReCor; and receives fees from Metavention, outside of the submitted work. Dr Kobayashi is on the advisory board and Speakers Bureau for Medtronic and ReCor Medical. Dr Lee has received grants from and serves on the advisory board for Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. Dr Weil has received support from Medtronic, Recor Medical, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. Dr Agdirlioglu receives speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis, outside of the submitted work. Dr Schlaich has received consulting fees and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Shetty has received consulting and speaker fees from Medtronic. Dr Devireddy has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, ReCor Medical, and Shockwave Medical, outside of the submitted work. Dr Sharp has received personal fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Recor Medical, and Philips, outside the submitted work. Dr Anderson has received speaker fees from Shockwave Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Mr Fahy, Mrs DeBruin, and Dr Brar are employees of Medtronic. Dr Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TTR 219, project number 322900939); and has received personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Servier, and Vifor during the conduct of the study. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) represents the most common and potentially curable cause of secondary hypertension. However, PA is not commonly screened for, and up to 34% of patients who screen positive do not complete the full diagnostic process. This suggests that the diagnostic process may pose a barrier to patients and may contribute to the under-diagnosis of PA., Aims: To evaluate the willingness of the Australian general public to undergo testing for secondary causes of hypertension and identify enablers or barriers to testing from the patients' perspective., Methods: An online survey containing questions on knowledge and attitudes towards hypertension, willingness to be tested and enablers/barriers towards testing was distributed to the Australian community., Results: Of 520 adult respondents (mean age 50.4 years, SD 27.3 years; 28.8% hypertensive; 56.0% female), the majority of non-hypertensive and hypertensive respondents (82.7% vs 70.0%; P = 0.03) were willing to undergo testing for a secondary cause of hypertension that involved blood and urine tests. Greater knowledge of hypertensive risk modification strategies and complications was predictive of willingness to be tested, whereas age, sex, education level, geographic location, socio-economic status and cardiovascular comorbidities were not. The top three barriers to testing included fear of a serious underlying condition, lack of belief in further testing and increased stress associated with further testing., Conclusion: A high proportion of patients are willing to engage in testing for a secondary cause of hypertension. Education about the risks associated with hypertension and the testing process may overcome several barriers to testing., (© 2022 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Resistant hypertension (RH) defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite the use of a combination of a renin-angiotensin system blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic at maximally tolerated doses is associated with a substantially increased risk of cardiovascular and renal events. Despite targeting relevant pathophysiological pathways contributing to elevated blood pressure, approximately 10-15% of hypertensive patients remain above recommended blood pressure targets. Further optimization of blood pressure control is particularly challenging in patient populations who frequently present with RH such as elderly and patients with chronic kidney disease, due to the unfavorable safety profile of the recommended fourth-line therapy with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This review explores the potential role of endothelin antagonists as an alternative fourth-line therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the well-described role of the endothelin pathway in the pathogenesis of hypertension, it is currently not targeted therapeutically. Recently however, main outcome data from the PRECISION study, a randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, in patients with RH on guideline-recommended standardized single-pill background therapy convincingly demonstrated the safety and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the dual endothelin antagonist Aprocitentan. Findings from the phase 3 PRECISION study could signify a turning point in the utilization of endothelin receptor antagonists as a standard treatment for patients with RH., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) are two devastating diseases that may occur in nondiabetics or individuals with diabetes and, when combined, it is referred to as cardiorenal disease. The impact of cardiorenal disease on society, the economy and the healthcare system is enormous. Although there are numerous therapies for cardiorenal disease, one therapy showing a great deal of promise is sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. The SGLT family member, SGLT2, is often implicated in the pathogenesis of a range of diseases, and the dysregulation of the activity of SGLT2 markedly effects the transport of glucose and sodium across the luminal membrane of renal cells. Inhibitors of SGLT2 were developed based on the antidiabetic action initiated by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption, thereby increasing glucosuria. Of great medical significance, large-scale clinical trials utilizing a range of SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated both metabolic and biochemical benefits via numerous novel mechanisms, such as sympathoinhibition, which will be discussed in this review. In summary, SGLT2 inhibitors clearly exert cardio-renal protection in people with and without diabetes in both preclinical and clinical settings. This exciting class of inhibitors improve hyperglycemia, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia and diabetic retinopathy via multiple mechanisms, of which many are yet to be elucidated.

Aims: Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based treatment option for hypertension. We sought to project clinical event reductions after radiofrequency renal denervation using a novel modelling approach., Methods and Results: The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a global, prospective all-comer registry to evaluate safety and efficacy after renal denervation. For this analysis, change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline was calculated from reported follow-up in the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Relative risks for death and other cardiovascular events as well as numbers needed to treat for event avoidance were obtained for the respective blood pressure reductions based on previously reported meta-regression analyses for the full cohort and high-risk subgroups including type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, resistant hypertension, and high basal cardiovascular risk. Average baseline office systolic blood pressure and reduction estimates for the full cohort (N = 2651) were 166±25 and -14.8 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean reductions in blood pressure ranged from -11.0--21.8 mmHg for the studied high-risk subgroups. Projected relative risks ranged from 0.57 for stroke in the resistant hypertension cohort to 0.92 for death in the diabetes cohort. Significant absolute reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events over 3 years compared with the projected control (8.6 ± 0.7% observed vs. 11.7 ± 0.9% for projected control; P < 0.01) were primarily due to reduced stroke incidence. The robustness of findings was confirmed in sensitivity and scenario analyses., Conclusion: Model-based projections suggest radiofrequency renal denervation for patients with uncontrolled hypertension adds considerable clinical benefit across a spectrum of different cohort characteristics., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Raised blood pressure (BP) remains the biggest risk factor contributing to the global burden of disease and mortality, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. May Measurement Month (MMM), an annual global screening campaign aims to highlight the importance of BP measurement by evaluating global awareness, treatment and control rates among adults with hypertension. In 2021, we assessed the global burden of these rates during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: Screening sites were set up in 54 countries between May and November 2021 and screenees were recruited by convenience sampling. Three sitting BPs were measured, and a questionnaire completed including demographic, lifestyle and clinical data. Hypertension was defined as a systolic BP at least 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic BP at least 90 mmHg (using the mean of the second and third readings) or taking antihypertensive medication. Multiple imputation was used to impute the average BP when readings were missing., Results: Of the 642 057 screenees, 225 882 (35.2%) were classified as hypertensive, of whom 56.8% were aware, and 50.3% were on antihypertensive medication. Of those on treatment, 53.9% had controlled BP (<140/90 mmHg). Awareness, treatment and control rates were lower than those reported in MMM campaigns before the COVID-19 pandemic. Minimal changes were apparent among those testing positive for, or being vaccinated against COVID-19. Of those on antihypertensive medication, 94.7% reported no change in their treatment because of the COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusion: The high yield of untreated or inadequately treated hypertension in MMM 2021 confirms the need for systematic BP screening where it does not currently exist., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Circulating lipids and lipoproteins mediate cardiovascular risk, however routine plasma lipid biochemistry provides limited information on pro-atherogenic remnant particles., Objective: We analysed plasma lipoprotein subclasses including very low-density and intermediate-density lipoprotein (VLDL and IDL); and assessed their associations with health and cardiometabolic risk., Methods: From 1,976 community-dwelling adults aged 45-67 years, 114/1071 women (10.6%) and 153/905 men (16.9%) were categorised as very healthy. Fasting plasma lipoprotein profiles comprising 112 parameters were measured using 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and associations with health status and cardiometabolic risk factors examined., Results: HDL cholesterol was higher, and IDL and VLDL cholesterol and triglycerides lower, in very healthy women compared to other women, and women compared to men. IDL and VLDL cholesterol and triglyceride were lower in very healthy men compared to other men. HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) A-I were inversely, and IDL and VLDL cholesterol, apoB-100, and apoB-100/apoA-I ratio directly associated with body mass index (BMI) in women and men. In women, LDL, IDL and VLDL cholesterol increased with age. Women with diabetes and cardiovascular disease had higher cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids and free cholesterol across IDL and VLDL fractions, with similar trends for men with diabetes., Conclusion: Lipoprotein subclasses and density fractions, and their lipid and apolipoprotein constituents, are differentially distributed by sex, health status and BMI. Very healthy women and men are distinguished by favorable lipoprotein profiles, particularly lower concentrations of VLDL and IDL, providing reference intervals for comparison with general populations and adults with cardiometabolic risk factors., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs) are transport proteins that are expressed throughout the body. Inhibition of SGLTs is a relatively novel therapeutic strategy to improve glycemic control and has been shown to promote cardiorenal benefits. Dual SGLT1/2 inhibitors (SGLT1/2i) such as sotagliflozin target both SGLT1 and 2 proteins. Sotagliflozin or vehicle was administered to diabetic Akimba mice for 8 weeks at a dose of 25 mg/kg/day. Urine glucose levels, water consumption, and body weight were measured weekly. Serum, kidney, pancreas, and brain tissue were harvested under terminal anesthesia. Tissues were assessed using immunohistochemistry or ELISA techniques. Treatment with sotagliflozin promoted multiple metabolic benefits in diabetic Akimba mice resulting in decreased blood glucose and improved polydipsia. Sotagliflozin also prevented mortalities associated with diabetes. Our data suggests that there is the possibility that combined SGLT1/2i may be superior to SGLT2i in controlling glucose homeostasis and provides protection of multiple organs affected by diabetes., Competing Interests: All the authors declare no competing interests., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Myocardial injury due to ischaemia within 30 days of non-cardiac surgery is prognostically relevant. We aimed to determine the discrimination, calibration, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of single-layer and multiple-layer neural networks for myocardial injury and death within 30 postoperative days. We analysed data from 24,589 participants in the Vascular Events in Non-cardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation study. Validation was performed on a randomly selected subset of the study population. Discrimination for myocardial injury by single-layer vs. multiple-layer models generated areas (95%CI) under the receiver operating characteristic curve of: 0.70 (0.69-0.72) vs. 0.71 (0.70-0.73) with variables available before surgical referral, p < 0.001; 0.73 (0.72-0.75) vs. 0.75 (0.74-0.76) with additional variables available on admission, but before surgery, p < 0.001; and 0.76 (0.75-0.77) vs. 0.77 (0.76-0.78) with the addition of subsequent variables, p < 0.001. Discrimination for death by single-layer vs. multiple-layer models generated areas (95%CI) under the receiver operating characteristic curve of: 0.71 (0.66-0.76) vs. 0.74 (0.71-0.77) with variables available before surgical referral, p = 0.04; 0.78 (0.73-0.82) vs. 0.83 (0.79-0.86) with additional variables available on admission but before surgery, p = 0.01; and 0.87 (0.83-0.89) vs. 0.87 (0.85-0.90) with the addition of subsequent variables, p = 0.52. The accuracy of the multiple-layer model for myocardial injury and death with all variables was 70% and 89%, respectively., (© 2023 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

Cardiometabolic disorders are associated with a substantial loss in quality of life and pose a large burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system has been shown to be a key player in several aspects relating to cardiometabolic disturbances. While diet- and exercise-induced approaches to help reduce weight remains the main strategy to combat metabolic disorders, this is often difficult to achieve. Current pharmacological approaches result in variable responses in different patient cohorts and long-term efficacy may be limited by medication side effects and non-adherence in the long term. There is a clear clinical need for complementary therapies to curb the burden of cardiometabolic disease. One such approach may include interventional sympathetic neuromodulation of organs relevant to cardiometabolic control. Data from sham-controlled clinical trials demonstrate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation. In analogy, denervation of the common hepatic artery is now feasible in humans and may prove to be similarly useful in modulating sympathetic overdrive directed towards the liver, pancreas and duodenum. Such a targeted multi-organ neuromodulation strategy may beneficially influence multiple aspects of the cardiometabolic disease continuum including blood pressure, glucose and lipid control., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin-angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.L. reports speaker honoraria from Medtronic and ReCor Medical. F.M. is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219) and has received scientific support and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, and ReCor Medical. M.A. has received research grants from the French Ministry of Health, the European Horizon 2020 programme, and Quantum Genomics; has received grant support and non-financial support from ReCor Medical and Idorsia; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alnylam Pharmaceutical, Medtronic, and Poxel Pharma. D.L.B. discloses the following relationships—Advisory Board: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Janssen, Level Ex, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; Board of Directors: AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, DRS.LINQ (stock options), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: Inaugural Chair, American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data Monitoring Committees: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME, Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Research Funding: Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, 89Bio; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, Svelte; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Takeda. S.E. has received scientific support and speaker honoraria from Medtronic, ReCor Medical, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, and Novartis. K.K. has received research grants from Asteras Pharma, Taisho Pharmaceutical, and Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Kowa, Sanofi, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Boehringer Ingelheim Japan outside the submitted work. G.P. reports speaker honoraria from Omron Healthcare, Bayer, and Servier. P.R. reports consulting for Bayer, CinCor, G3P, Idorsia, and KBP; honoraria from Ablative Solutions, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvidia, CVRx, Fresenius, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa Inc., a Vifor Pharma Group Company, Roche, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Servier, and Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma; Cofounder: CardioRenal, a company developing potassium and creatinine sensors for home monitoring. M.P.S. is supported by an NHMRC Research Fellowship and has received consulting fees, and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. K.K.T. has nothing to declare. R.R.T. Consultant to Medtronic, BD, AXIO, and Jansen, Royalty from UpToDate; grants from NIH. C.T. has received speaker honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Sanofi, Medtronic, Novartis, and ReCor Medical. M.A.W. reports consulting and research payments from Medtronic, ReCor Medical, Ablative Solutions, Johnson & Johnson, and Urovant. T.W. reports speaker honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichy Sankyo, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier and research support from Medtronic. M.B. reports personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Vifor, Servier, Medtronic, and Novartis; and grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Many people with type 2 diabetes progress to end-stage diabetic kidney disease (DKD) despite blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, suggesting the need for innovative treatment options for DKD. To capture the findings of recent studies, we performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors combined with standard care involving angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the development and progression of DKD in people with type 2 diabetes compared with standard care alone., Methods: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and clinical trials registers were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published before 1 September 2022. Primary outcomes were urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Secondary outcomes were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Relative risk was calculated for adverse events., Results: Eight studies enrolling 5512 participants were included. In the meta-analysis (n = 1327), SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a statistically significant reduction in UACR (weighted mean difference [WMD] -105.61 mg/g, 95 % CI -197.25 to -13.98, I 2  = 99 %, p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in relation to eGFR (n = 1375; WMD -0.23 mL/min/1.73m 2 , 95 % CI -4.34 to 3.89, I 2  = 94 %, p = 0.91)., Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to standard care including ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs significantly reduced albuminuria, HbA1c and SBP when compared to standard care alone, supporting their routine use in people with type 2 diabetes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement MPS has received research support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and consulting/lecture fees from Medtronic and Abbott. The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Cuffless wearable blood pressure (BP) devices may allow detailed evaluation of BP for prolonged periods, but their ability to accurately track BP changes is uncertain. We investigated whether a commercially available cuffless wearable device tracks: 24-h systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared to conventional ambulatory monitoring (ABPM); and antihypertensive medication-induced BP changes compared to cuff-based home BP monitoring (HBPM)., Methods: We fitted 41 participants (32% females, 58 ± 14 years, 80% hypertensive) with a wrist-wearable cuffless BP device (Aktiia) continuously for 6-12 days. At the beginning and the end of this period, 24-h ABPM was performed. Three participants with hypertension (one female; 60 ± 8 years) wore the Aktiia device and performed HBPM continuously one week before and 2 weeks after antihypertensive medication uptitration., Results: Compared to ABPM, Aktiia reported higher average SBP for 24-h (difference 4.9 mmHg, 95% CI [1.9, 7.9]) and night-time (15.5[11.8, 19.1] mmHg; all P ≤ 0.01), but similar daytime (1.0 [-1.8, 3.8] mmHg; P = 0.48). Similarly, average cuffless DBP was higher for 24-h (4.2 [2.3, 6.0] mmHg) and night-time (11.8 [9.5, 14.1] mmHg; both P  < 0.001), but similar during daytime (1.4 [-0.4, 3.23] mmHg; P  = 0.13). Aktiia also reported reduced night-time dip for SBP (difference 14.2 [12.1, 16.3] mmHg) and DBP (10.2 [8.5, 11.9] mmHg; both P  < 0.001). The average medication-induced SBP/DBP decline after 2 weeks of uptitration was -1.0/-0.8 mmHg with Aktiia vs. -19.7/-11.5 mmHg with HBPM ( P  = 0.03 for difference)., Conclusion: This cuffless wearable device did not accurately track night-time BP decline and results suggested it was unable to track medication-induced BP changes., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The objective was to determine the clinical and biochemical success rates and assess the nature of follow-up after adrenalectomy in patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA), subtyped by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) in West Australia (WA) using the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated in patients with unilateral PA who underwent adrenalectomy according to AVS between September 2017 and September 2020. Pre- and post-surgical data were collected using a standardised questionnaire, review of clinic letters and examination of private and public pathology results and radiological reports. Follow-up data were available for 47 patients post-adrenalectomy; biochemical outcome data were available for 37 patients, clinical outcome data for 40 patients, with 30 patients having both outcomes available. Final assessment was performed between 0 to 3 months in 23/37 (62.2%) patients with biochemical outcomes, 15/40 (37.5%) with clinical outcomes, and 17/30 (56.7%) with both clinical and biochemical outcomes. Complete biochemical success was achieved in 83.8% (31/37) of patients, with 26.7% (8/30) obtaining both complete clinical and biochemical success. Complete clinical success was achieved in 35.0% (14/40) of patients, with 47.5% (19/40) obtaining partial clinical success. Overall, 93.6% (44/47) of patients derived benefit from adrenalectomy. The outcomes of adrenalectomy for unilateral PA in Western Australian using standardised PASO criteria demonstrate highly comparable clinical and biochemical success rates to international data. However, further standardisation of post-operative follow-up care needs to be implemented to ensure the recommended repeat follow-up assessment criteria are collected., (Copyright © 2023 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. All rights reserved.)

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of end-stage blindness globally and is arguably one of the most disabling complications of both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have now been successfully introduced to clinical medicine and exert multiple beneficial effects in diabetic patients. Given the broad therapeutic application of SGLT2 inhibitors, we hypothesised that SGLT2 inhibition may alleviate the progression of DR. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of two clinically available SGLT2 inhibitors, Empagliflozin and Canagliflozin, on the progression of Retinopathy and DR using well-characterised mouse models, Kimba and Akimba, respectively., Methods: Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin (25 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was administered to 10-week-old mice via drinking water for 8-weeks. Urine glucose levels were measured to ascertain SGLT2 inhibition promoted glucose excretion. Weekly body weight and water intake measurements were obtained. After 8-weeks of treatment, body weight, daily water intake, fasting blood glucose levels were measured and eye tissue was harvested. The retinal vasculature was assessed using immunofluorescence., Results: Empagliflozin treated Akimba mice exhibited metabolic benefits suggested by healthy body weight gain and significantly reduced fasting blood glucose levels. Treatment with Empagliflozin reduced retinal vascular lesions in both Kimba and Akimba mice. Canagliflozin improved body weight gain, reduced blood glucose levels in Akimba mice, and reduced the development of retinal vascular lesions in Kimba mice., Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that Empagliflozin has future potential as a therapeutic for Retinopathy and DR and should now be considered for human trials., Competing Interests: MS has received research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. The other authors declare no conflicts of interests., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Since the publication of the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension, several high-quality studies, including randomised, sham-controlled trials on catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) were published, confirming both the blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of radiofrequency and ultrasound RDN in a broad range of patients with hypertension, including resistant hypertension. A clinical consensus document by the ESC Council on Hypertension and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) on RDN in the management of hypertension was considered necessary to inform clinical practice. This expert group proposes that RDN is an adjunct treatment option in uncontrolled resistant hypertension, confirmed by ambulatory BP measurements, despite best efforts at lifestyle and pharmacological interventions. RDN may also be used in patients who are unable to tolerate antihypertensive medications in the long term. A shared decision-making process is a key feature and preferably includes a patient who is well informed on the benefits and limitations of the procedure. The decision-making process should take (i) the patient's global cardiovascular (CV) risk and/or (ii) the presence of hypertension-mediated organ damage or CV complications into account. Multidisciplinary hypertension teams involving hypertension experts and interventionalists evaluate the indication and facilitate the RDN procedure. Interventionalists require expertise in renal interventions and specific training in RDN procedures. Centres performing these procedures require the skills and resources to deal with potential complications. Future research is needed to address open questions and investigate the impact of BP-lowering with RDN on clinical outcomes and potential clinical indications beyond hypertension., (This article has been co-published with permission in the European Heart Journal and EuroIntervention. All rights reserved. © the European Society of Cardiology and the Authors 2023. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either citation can be used when citing this article.)

Background: Raised blood pressure (BP) remains the single most important modifiable risk factor contributing to cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in Australia and worldwide. May Measurement Month , a global BP measurement and screening campaign initiated by the International Society of Hypertension and carried out in Australia since its inception in 2017, aimed at obtaining standardized BP measurements from members of the community to increase awareness of high BP and its associated risks., Method: Adults participants (≥18 years) were recruited through opportunistic sampling across Australia during the month of May in 2017, 2018 and 2019. Trained volunteers recorded BP readings in a standardized manner and collected data on demographic, lifestyle factors and comorbidities. Hypertension was defined as SBP of at least 140 mmHg, or DBP of at least 90 mmHg, or taking antihypertensive medication. Data were collated centrally and analysis was carried out using regression models to evaluate the associations between BP and participant characteristics., Results: A total of 10 046 participants were screened, of whom 3097 (31.0%) had hypertension, only 48.5% were aware of their condition and 44.4% were taking antihypertensive medication. Of those taking antihypertensive medication, 53.2% were controlled to less than 140/90 mmHg, whereas the remaining 46.8% of participants had BP of at least 140/90 mmHg suggestive of inadequately treated hypertension., Conclusion: Consecutive data obtained over a 3-year period in Australia demonstrated stagnating awareness, treatment and control rates with the latter two being substantially lower than global rates and those in other high-income countries. Concerted efforts from all stakeholders will be required to help overcome the unacceptably poor rates of BP treatment and control in Australia., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent sham-controlled randomized clinical trials have confirmed the safety and efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN). Long-term safety and efficacy data beyond 3 years are scarce. Here, we report on outcomes after RDN in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension with an average of ≈9-year follow-up (FU)., Methods: We recruited patients with resistant hypertension who were previously enrolled in various RDN trials applying radiofrequency energy for blood pressure (BP) lowering. All participants had baseline assessments before RDN and repeat assessment at long-term FU including medical history, automated office and ambulatory BP measurement, and routine blood and urine tests. We analyzed changes between baseline and long-term FU., Results: A total of 66 participants (mean±SD, 70.0±10.3 years; 76.3% men) completed long-term FU investigations with a mean of 8.8±1.2 years post-procedure. Compared with baseline, ambulatory systolic BP was reduced by -12.1±21.6 (from 145.2 to 133.1) mm Hg ( P <0.0001) and diastolic BP by -8.8±12.8 (from 81.2 to 72.7) mm Hg ( P <0.0001). Mean heart rate remained unchanged. At long-term FU, participants were on one less antihypertensive medication compared with baseline ( P =0.0052). Renal function assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate fell within the expected age-associated rate of decline from 71.1 to 61.2 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 . Time above target was reduced significantly from 75.0±25.9% at baseline to 47.3±30.3% at long-term FU ( P <0.0001)., Conclusions: RDN results in a significant and robust reduction in both office and ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP at ≈9-year FU after catheter-based RDN on less medication and without evidence of adverse consequences on renal function.

Abstract: Raised blood pressure (BP) is the leading cause of preventable death in the world. Yet, its global prevalence is increasing, and it remains poorly detected, treated, and controlled in both high- and low-resource settings. From the perspective of members of the International Society of Hypertension based in all regions, we reflect on the past, present, and future of hypertension care, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, which are often region-specific. We report that most countries failed to show sufficient improvements in BP control rates over the past three decades, with greater improvements mainly seen in some high-income countries, also reflected in substantial reductions in the burden of cardiovascular disease and deaths. Globally, there are significant inequities and disparities based on resources, sociodemographic environment, and race with subsequent disproportionate hypertension-related outcomes. Additional unique challenges in specific regions include conflict, wars, migration, unemployment, rapid urbanization, extremely limited funding, pollution, COVID-19-related restrictions and inequalities, obesity, and excessive salt and alcohol intake. Immediate action is needed to address suboptimal hypertension care and related disparities on a global scale. We propose a Global Hypertension Care Taskforce including multiple stakeholders and societies to identify and implement actions in reducing inequities, addressing social, commercial, and environmental determinants, and strengthening health systems implement a well-designed customized quality-of-care improvement framework., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.E.S. received speaker honoraria from different pharmaceutical companies and device manufacturers for work unrelated to this paper; P.M.N. has received speaker honoraria from different pharmaceutical companies. K.K. reports research grants from A&D, Omron Healthcare, Fukuda Denshi, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Holdings, CureApp, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Daiichi Sankyo, Taisho Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Teijin Pharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Pfizer Japan, Fukuda Lifetec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Roche Diagnostics; and Consulting fees from A&D, JIMRO, Omron Healthcare, CureApp, Kyowa Kirin, Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho, Terumo, Fukuda Denshi, Mochida Pharmaceutical; and Honoraria from Idorsia, Omron Healthcare, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis Pharma, Mylan EPD; and Participation in Advisory Board of Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis Pharma, Fukuda Denshi outside the submitted work. J.-G.W. reports having received lecture and consulting fees from Novartis, Omron, Servier, and Viatris. M.P.S. has received consulting fees, and/or travel and research support from Medtronic, Abbott, Metavention, ReCor, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. E.S.W.J. has received honoraria from pharmaceutical companies for work unrelated to this publication. N.R.P. has received financial support from several pharmaceutical companies which manufacture BP-lowering agents, for consultancy fees (Servier), research projects, and staff (Servier, Pfizer) and for arranging and speaking at educational meetings (AstraZeneca, Lri Therapharma, Napi, Servier, Sanofi, Eva Pharma, Pfizer, Glenmark Pharma, Alkem Lab, and Emcure India). He holds no stocks and shares in any such companies. This manuscript was handled by Guest Editor Thomas F. Lüscher, (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness globally. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been demonstrated to exert cardiorenal protection in patients with diabetes. However, their potential beneficial effect on DR is less well studied. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the SGLT2 inhibition with Dapagliflozin (DAPA) on DR in well-characterised DR mouse models and controls., Methods: Dapagliflozin was administered to mice with and without diabetes for 8 weeks via their drinking water at 25 mg/kg/day. Urine glucose levels were measured weekly and their response to glucose was tested at week 7. After 8 weeks of treatment, eye tissue was harvested under terminal anaesthesia. The retinal vasculature and neural structure were assessed using immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy techniques., Results: Dapagliflozin treated DR mice exhibited metabolic benefits reflected by healthy body weight gain and pronounced glucose tolerance. Dapagliflozin reduced the development of retinal microvascular and neural abnormalities, increased the beneficial growth factor FGF21 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 21). We highlight for the first time that SGLT2 inhibition results in the upregulation of SGLT1 protein in the retina and that SGLT1 is significantly increased in the diabetic retina., Conclusions: Blockade of SGLT2 activity with DAPA may reduce retinal microvascular lesions in our novel DR mouse model. In conclusion, our data demonstrates the exciting future potential of SGLT1 and/or SGLT2 inhibition as a therapeutic for DR., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Background: Resistant hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The endothelin pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension, but it is currently not targeted therapeutically, thereby leaving this relevant pathophysiological pathway unopposed with currently available drugs. The aim of the study was to assess the blood pressure lowering efficacy of the dual endothelin antagonist aprocitentan in patients with resistant hypertension., Methods: PRECISION was a multicentre, blinded, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 study, which was done in hospitals or research centres in Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia. Patients were eligible for randomisation if their sitting systolic blood pressure was 140 mm Hg or higher despite taking standardised background therapy consisting of three antihypertensive drugs, including a diuretic. The study consisted of three sequential parts: part 1 was the 4-week double-blind, randomised, and placebo-controlled part, in which patients received aprocitentan 12·5 mg, aprocitentan 25 mg, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio; part 2 was a 32-week single (patient)-blind part, in which all patients received aprocitentan 25 mg; and part 3 was a 12-week double-blind, randomised, and placebo-controlled withdrawal part, in which patients were re-randomised to aprocitentan 25 mg or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary and key secondary endpoints were changes in unattended office systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 4 and from withdrawal baseline to week 40, respectively. Secondary endpoints included 24-h ambulatory blood pressure changes. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03541174., Findings: The PRECISION study was done from June 18, 2018, to April 25, 2022. 1965 individuals were screened and 730 were randomly assigned. Of these 730 patients, 704 (96%) completed part 1 of the study; of these, 613 (87%) completed part 2 and, of these, 577 (94%) completed part 3 of the study. The least square mean (SE) change in office systolic blood pressure at 4 weeks was -15·3 (SE 0·9) mm Hg for aprocitentan 12·5 mg, -15·2 (0·9) mm Hg for aprocitentan 25 mg, and -11·5 (0·9) mm Hg for placebo, for a difference versus placebo of -3·8 (1·3) mm Hg (97·5% CI -6·8 to -0·8, p=0·0042) and -3·7 (1·3) mm Hg (-6·7 to -0·8; p=0·0046), respectively. The respective difference for 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure was -4·2 mm Hg (95% CI -6·2 to -2·1) and -5·9 mm Hg (-7·9 to -3·8). After 4 weeks of withdrawal, office systolic blood pressure significantly increased with placebo versus aprocitentan (5·8 mm Hg, 95% CI 3·7 to 7·9, p<0·0001). The most frequent adverse event was mild-to-moderate oedema or fluid retention, occurring in 9%, 18%, and 2% for patients receiving aprocitentan 12·5 mg, 25 mg, and placebo, during the 4-week double-blind part, respectively. This event led to discontinuation in seven patients treated with aprocitentan. During the trial, a total of 11 treatment-emergent deaths occurred, none of which were regarded by the investigators to be related to study treatment., Interpretation: In patients with resistant hypertension, aprocitentan was well tolerated and superior to placebo in lowering blood pressure at week 4 with a sustained effect at week 40., Funding: Idorsia Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Biotech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MPS has received institutional grants or contracts and personal consulting fees from Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, and ReCor Medical; personal payment or honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott Laboratories, Merck, and Servier Laboratories; personal support for attending meetings, travel, or both from Medtronic and Abbott Laboratories; serves as the President of the High Blood Pressure Research Council of Australia; and is on the International Society of Hypertension scientific committee. MB is an employee of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals. MAW is has received consulting fees or performed research services for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, CinCor, Medtronic, ReCor, and Ablative Solutions. PD and RFD are employees of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals and hold stock or stock options in Idorsia Pharmaceuticals. GLB has received consulting fees from Bayer, KBP BioSciences, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Quantum Genomics, Novo Nordisk, Janssen, Dia Medica Therapeutics, and InREGEN. JMF has received consulting fees from Ardelyx, Janssen, Amgen, FibroGen, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and ReCor Medical; and payment for a lecture at a continuing medical education event from Janssen. MS-S is an employee of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals. LPH is an employee of Janssen and holds stock in Janssen. KN has received personal honoraria from Bausch Health, Berlin-Chemie (Menarini Group), Egis, Gedeon Richter, Krka, Medtronic, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Polpharma, Recordati, and Servier Laboratories; and has participated in an advisory board for Idorsia Pharmaceuticals. J-GW declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Elevated circulating platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (pEVs) have been associated with arterial hypertension. The role of hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) to induce EV release is still unknown. We studied the micro- and macro-vascular changes (retinal vascular density and pulse wave velocity), endothelial function (flow-mediated vasodilation of brachial artery and finger plethysmography), and assessed the psychosocial status (anxiety and depression) in hypertensive patients to determine their relationship with EV release. Pulse wave velocity showed a significant positive correlation with pEVs (r = 0.33; p = 0.01). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) negatively correlated with retinal vascularity. The superficial retinal vascular plexus density in the whole image showed a significant negative correlation with 24 h SBP (r = −0.38, p < 0.01), day-SBP (r = −0.35, p = 0.01), and night-SBP (r = −0.27, p = 0.04). pEVs did not show significant associations with microvascular damage (retinal vascular density), endothelial function (flow-mediated vasodilation of brachial artery and finger plethysmography), or psychosocial status (anxiety and depression). Our results indicate that the pEV levels were associated with macrovascular damage measured by PWV, whereas no significant association between pEVs and microvascular damage, endothelial function, or emotional status could be detected. The potential utility of pEV in clinical practice in the context of HMOD may be limited to macrovascular changes.

Background: Several definitions of night-time BP exist for the calculation of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) based on 24-h BP measurements. How much these methods differ regarding the resulting nocturnal blood pressure values, under which circumstances these differences become clinically meaningful, and under which circumstances diary-adjusted measurements should be used preferentially remains uncertain., Methods: Data of 512 24-h BP recordings were analysed regarding differences in nocturnal BP based on three alternative definitions of night-time: 2300-0700 h, 0100-0500 h, and diary-adjusted measures., Results: Mean systolic nocturnal BP between 2300-0700 h was 2.5 mmHg higher than between 0100 and 0500 h and 1.6 mmHg higher than diary adjusted estimates. Up to 38.3% of individuals showed BP differences of more than 5 mmHg when comparing temporal definitions of night-time, resulting in significant proportions of individuals being re-classified as hypertensive. When diary-derived sleeping patterns differed by less than 2 h from the 2300 to 0700 h fixed time definition, mean BP discrepancies remained below 3 mmHg. Absolute time discrepancies between diary and 2300-0700 h fixed time definition of 2-4, 4-8 or at least 8 h led to SBP/DBP differences of 4.1/3.1, 6.8/6.1, and 14.5/9.1mmHg, respectively., Conclusion: Average differences of nocturnal BP between varying definitions in study/cohort data are small and would be of limited relevance in many settings. However, substantial differences can be observed in individual cases, which may affect clinical decision-making in specific patients. In patients whose sleeping patterns differs by more than 2 h from defined fixed night-times, diaries should be used for adjustment., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Elevated nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is closely associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been proposed as a potential CV risk biomarker and shown to correlate with BP. The present study aimed to assess whether a reduction in BP is paralleled by respective changes in EVs., Methods: Fifty-five hypertensive patients (age: 57.7 ± 14.1 years) were included in the study. EVs and BP were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks follow-up. Interventions to lower BP included advice on life-style modification only or life-style advice combined with additional pharmacotherapy. EVs were evaluated by flow cytometry (CD41+/Annexin V+) and BP by unobserved automated office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring., Results: Nocturnal systolic BP correlated with EV levels at baseline ( P  = 0.01). Multivariable regression models showed that changes in nocturnal systolic BP (adjusted R2  = 0.23; P  = 0.01) and diastolic BP (adjusted R2  = 0.18; P  = 0.02) were associated with respective changes in EV levels. Furthermore, intervention-induced improvement of systolic dipping was associated with a reduction in EVs in the univariate analysis (adjusted R2  = 0.06; P  = 0.03). In contrast, systolic office, 24 h- and daytime-BP did not show significant associations with EVs. Patients whose medication was up-titrated at baseline showed a trend towards lower EV levels at follow-up (absolute change of -1.7 ± 1.3 EV/μl; P  = 0.057)., Conclusions: Circulating platelet-derived EVs were positively associated with nocturnal BP and therapy-induced changes over a 12-week treatment period. EVs may provide an integrated measure of BP changes achieved with pharmacotherapy., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N.R.P. has received financial support from several pharmaceutical companies which manufacture BP-lowering agents, for consultancy fees (Servier, Aktiia), research projects and staff (Servier, Pfizer), and for arranging and speaking at educational meetings (AstraZeneca, Lri Therapharma, Napi, Servier, Sanofi, Eva Pharma, Pfizer, Emcure India, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories). He holds no stocks and shares in any such companies. He is the Chairman of the Steering Committee of the TIME trial. C.B., A.D., T.H.J., N.A.K., Y.K., D.P., W.W., T.B. have no conflicts of interest to declare. M.P.S. has received consulting fees, and/or travel and research support (Medtronic, Abbott, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, and Boehringer-Ingelheim). G.S.S. received consulting and lecture fees (Servier and OMRON). T.U. has received honoraria for lectures and advice during the last 3 years (Boehringer-Ingelheim, ICI, Synlab, Vifor, Cipla-India, and Abbott). A.E.S. received speaker honoraria and/or travel support from Omron, Servier, Takeda, Sanofi, Sun pharmaceuticals, and Abbott. P.M.N. received lecturing fees from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer-Ingeheim, and Amgen during recent years. He is a member of a regional advisory group for Sanofi. C.B. has received consulting and/or speaker’s fees (Novartis, Servier, Novo Nordisk, Menarini, Alfasigma).

Recent findings in experimental models have shown that the microRNA miR-132 (mir-132) is an important regulator of liver homeostasis and lipid metabolism. We aimed to assess miR-132 expression in liver and fat tissues of obese individuals and examine its association with blood pressure (BP) and hepatic steatosis. We examined obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery for weight loss (n = 19). Clinical and demographic information was obtained. Quantitative PCR was performed to determine tissue expression of miR-132 in liver and subcutaneous and visceral fat biopsies obtained during bariatric surgery. Liver biopsies were read by a single liver pathologist and graded for steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis. Participants (aged 39 ± 8.1 years) had a body mass index (BMI) of 42 ± 4.5 kg/m 2 and presented with 2.2 ± 1.2 metabolic abnormalities. Supine BP was 127 ± 16/74 ± 11 mmHg. Hepatic and visceral fat expression of miR-132 were correlated (r = 0.59, P = 0.033). There was no correlation between subcutaneous and visceral expression of miR-132 (r = -0.31, P = 0.20). Hepatic and visceral fat miR-132 expression were associated with BMI (r = 0.62 and r = 0.68, P = 0.049 respectively) and degree of liver steatosis (r = 0.60 and r = 0.55, P < 0.05, respectively). Subcutaneous fat miRNA-132 expression was correlated to office systolic BP (r = 0.46, P < 0.05), several aspects of 24 h BP (24 h systolic BP: r = 0.52; day systolic BP: r = 0.59, P < 0.05 for all), plasma triglycerides (r = 0.51, P < 0.01) and liver enzymes (ALT: r = -0.52; AST: r = -0.48, P < 0.05 for all). We found an association between miR-132 and markers of cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Reduction of miR-132 may be a target for the regulation of liver lipid homeostasis and control of obesity-related blood pressure., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Elevated circulating platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been reported in conditions associated with thrombotic risk. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between circulating platelet-derived EV levels, cardiovascular risk stratification and vascular organ damage, as assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV). A total of 92 patients were included in the present analysis. Platelet EV were evaluated by flow cytometry (CD41+/Annexin v+). The cardiovascular risk was determined using the 2021 ESC guideline stratification and SCORE2 and SCORE-OP. PWV was performed as a surrogate to assess macrovascular damage. Risk stratification revealed significant group differences in EV levels (ANOVA, p = 0.04). Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly higher levels of EVs in the very high-risk group compared with the young participants (12.53 ± 8.69 vs. 7.51 ± 4.67 EV/µL, p = 0.03). Linear regression models showed SCORE2 and SCORE-OP (p = 0.04) was a predictor of EV levels. EVs showed a significant association with macrovascular organ damage measured by PWV (p = 0.01). PWV progressively increased with more severe cardiovascular risk (p < 0.001) and was also associated with SCORE2 and SCORE-OP (p < 0.001). Within the pooled group of subjects with low to moderate risk and young participants (<40 years), those with EV levels in the highest tertile had a trend towards higher nocturnal blood pressure levels, fasting glucose concentration, lipid levels, homocysteine and PWV. Levels of platelet-derived EVs were highest in those patients with very high CV risk. Within a pooled group of patients with low to moderate risk, an unfavourable cardiometabolic profile was present with higher EV levels.