51. A comparison between emergency diagnostic and treatment unit and inpatient care in the management of acute asthma.
- Author
-
McDermott MF, Murphy DG, Zalenski RJ, Rydman RJ, McCarren M, Marder D, Jovanovic B, Kaur K, Roberts RR, Isola M, Mensah E, Rajendran R, and Kampe L
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asthma economics, Chicago, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Emergency Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Female, Hospitals, County statistics & numerical data, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Asthma therapy, Emergency Service, Hospital organization & administration, Hospitalization economics, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Treatment Outcome
- Abstract
Background: Emergency diagnostic and treatment units (EDTUs) may provide an alternative to hospitalization for patients with reversible diseases, such as asthma, who fail to adequately respond to emergency department therapy., Objective: To evaluate the medical and cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and quality of life of patients receiving EDTU care for acute asthma compared with inpatient care., Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial performed at 2 urban public hospitals enrolled patients with acute asthma (age range, 18-55 years) not meeting discharge criteria after 3 hours of emergency department therapy. Patients were treated with inhaled adrenergic agonists and steroids in an EDTU for up to 9 hours after randomization or with routine therapy in a hospital ward. Patients were followed up for 8 weeks., Main Outcome Measures: Discharge rate from the EDTU, length of stay, relapse rates, days missed from work or school, days incapacitated during waking hours, symptom-free days and nights, nocturnal awakenings, direct medical costs, patients satisfaction, and patient quality of life., Results: The study consisted of 222 patients with asthma. Sixty-five patients (59%) treated in an EDTU were discharged home; the remainder were admitted to the hospital. There were no differences during the follow-up period in relapse rates (P = .74) or in any other morbidities between the EDTU and inpatient groups. There were significant differences in the length of stay, patient satisfaction, and quality of life favoring EDTU care. The mean (+/-SD) cost per patient in the EDTU group was $1202.79 +/- $1343.96, compared with $2247.32 +/- $1110.18 for the control group (P < .001)., Conclusions: Treatment of selected patients with asthma in an EDTU results in the safe discharge of most such patients. This study suggests that quality gains and cost-effective measures can be achieved by the use of such units.
- Published
- 1997