Search

Action selection describes the high-level process that selects between competing movements. In animals, behavioral variability is critical for the motor exploration required to select the action that optimizes reward and minimizes cost/punishment and is guided by dopamine (DA). The aim of this study was to test in humans whether low-level movement parameters are affected by punishment and reward in ways similar to high-level action selection. Moreover, we addressed the proposed dependence of behavioral and neurophysiological variability on DA and whether this may underpin the exploration of kinematic parameters. Participants performed an out-and-back index finger movement and were instructed that monetary reward and punishment were based on its maximal acceleration (MA). In fact, the feedback was not contingent on the participant's behavior but predetermined. Blocks highly biased toward punishment were associated with increased MA variability relative to blocks either with reward or without feedback. This increase in behavioral variability was positively correlated with neurophysiological variability, as measured by changes in corticospinal excitability with transcranial magnetic stimula-tion over the primary motor cortex. Following the administration of a DA antagonist, the variability associated with punishment dimin-ished and the correlation between behavioral and neurophysiological variability no longer existed. Similar changes in variability were not observed when participants executed a predetermined MA, nor did DA influence resting neurophysiological variability. Thus, under conditions of punishment, DA-dependent processes influence the selection of low-level movement parameters. We propose that the enhanced behavioral variability reflects the exploration of kinematic parameters for less punishing, or conversely more rewarding, outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been applied as a probe to test functional connectivity within distinct cortical areas of the human motor system. Here, we tested the interaction between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and ipsilateral motor cortex (M1). A conditioning TMS pulse over the right PPC potentiates motor evoked-potentials evoked by a test TMS pulse over the ipsilateral motor cortex, with a time course characterized by two phases: an early peak at 4ms interstimulus interval (ISI) and a late peak at 15 ms ISI. Activation of this facilitatory pathway depends on the intensity of stimulation, because the effects are induced with a conditioning stimulus of 90% resting motor threshold but not at lower or higher intensities. Similar results were obtained testing the ipsilateral interaction in the left hemisphere with a slightly different time course. In control experiments, we found that activation of this facilitatory pathway depends on the direction of induced current in the brain and is specific for stimulation of the caudal part of the inferior parietal sulcus (cIPS) site, because it is not observed for stimulation of adjacent scalp sites. Finally, we found that by using poststimulus time histogram analysis of single motor unit firing, the PPC conditioning increases the excitability of ipsilateral M1, enhancing the relative amount of late I wave input recruited by the test stimulus over M1, suggesting that such interaction is mediated by specific interneurons in the motor cortex. The described facilitatory connections between cIPS and M1 may be important in a variety of motor tasks and neuropsychiatric disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Learning may alter rapidly the output organization of adult motor cortex. It is a long-held hypothesis that modification of synaptic strength along cortical horizontal connections through long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) forms one important mechanism for learning-induced cortical plasticity. Strong evidence in favor of this hypothesis was provided for rat primary motor cortex (M1) by showing that motor learning reduced subsequent LTP but increased LTD. Whether a similar relationship exists in humans is unknown. Here, we induced LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity in the intact human M 1 by an established paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol. PAS consisted of 200 pairs of electrical stimulation of the right median nerve, followed by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hand area of the left M1 at an interval equaling the individual N20 latency of the median nerve somatosensory-evoked cortical potential (PASN20]) or N20-5 msec (PASN20-5). PASN20 induced reproducibly a LTP-like long-lasting (>30 min) increase in motor-evoked potentials from the left M 1 to a thumb abductor muscle of the right hand, whereas PASN20-5-induced a LTD-like decrease. Repeated fastest possible thumb abduction movements resulted in learning, defined by an increase in maximum peak acceleration of the practiced movements, and prevented subsequent PASN20-induced LTP-like plasticity but enhanced subsequent PASN20-5-induced LTD-like plasticity. The same number of repeated slow thumb abduction movements did not result in learning and had no effects on PAS-induced plasticity. Findings support the view that learning in human M1 occurs through LTP-like mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors review the study conducted by researcher E. R. Buch and team in 2011 to demonstrate selective potentiation of physiological connectivity between two human brain regions including ventral premotor cortex and primary motor cortex, using paired associative transcranial magnetic stimulation. They infer that it is an important effort to improve and tailor plasticity-inducing strategies. They also speculate that endogenous brain activity may serve as a stimulus of Hebbian plasticity.

Background: Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) has a lifetime prevalence of 1-2%. Standard treatments are ineffective in up to 40% of cases. Even with the best treatments, there remains a subgroup with severe symptoms and significant disability. Studies of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for OCD have shown improvement in both symptoms and quality of life in severe OCD. Two targets in particular have shown promise: the anteromedial subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) [1-3]. It is not clear however if one site has advantages over the other and, with regard to the VC/VS site, whether stimulation of the anterior capsule white matter or ventral striatum/ nucleus accumbens grey matter is critical for improvement [2, 3]. Aims: We report a within subject comparison of the effect of DBS on OCD symptoms at STN and VC/VS sites both individually and together (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02655926). The aims of the study were to determine: a) the efficacy of DBS at each site; b) whether stimulation of both sites improves the response compared to either site alone; and c) the critical stimulation contacts at the VC/VS site. Methods: Six participants, with severe treatment refractory OCD, were recruited via the UK specialist OCD service and underwent implantation of bilateral electrodes at both the VC/VS and anteromedial STN sites. A Leksell frame-based MRI-guided and MRI-verified approach under general anaesthesia was used. The subthalamic nucleus was localised on axial T2-weighted stereotactic images and the VC/VS localised on coronal and axial proton density images (Siemens, 1.5T). Using a double blind cross-over design, 12-weeks stimulation at STN and VC/VS sites was compared, followed by stimulation at both sites for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was YBOCS: an improvement of greater than or equal to 35% was the predefined response. Results: Accurate stereotactic and anatomical lead location was confirmed on immediate postoperative stereotactic MR images in all patients. For the VC/VS target, the deepest DBS lead contact was within the nucleus accumbens, the one superior to that in the 'shell' of the nucleus accumbens while the superior two contacts were within the inferior aspect of the anterior limb of the internal capsule. The response rates (defined as the number of patients with >35% reduction in YBOCS) were: STN 3/6; VC/VS: 5/6; STN + VC/VS: 5/6. In the one non-responder YBOCS reduction was 32% after the combined STN+VC/VS stimulation phase. For the whole group, the mean reduction in YBOCS scores were: STN 16.3; VC/ VS: 19.2; STN + VC/VS: 22.0 which represents a mean reduction of 42%, 53%, 62% from their own baseline scores and a reduction to predefined mild/subclinical symptoms of 0%, 50% 50% respectively. The top two DBS contacts of the quadripolar lead were found to be the most effective at the VC/VS target in all 6 patients. Conclusion: These results suggest that: a) The VC/VS site may be superior to the STN site for the amelioration of severe OCD symptoms; b) There is only a modest advantage of stimulating both sites together; and c) The effective stimulation site for the VC/VS target is the inferior aspect of the anterior limb of the internal capsule and not the ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens grey matter. The study was funded by the MRC (MR/J012009/1). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy provides an exciting development in the field of minimally invasive stereotactic neurosurgery. Current treatment options for focal hand dystonia are limited, with potentially more effective invasive stereotactic interventions, such as deep brain stimulation or lesional therapies, rarely used. The advent of minimally invasive brain lesioning provides a potentially safe and effective treatment approach with a recent pilot study establishing MRgFUS Vo-complex thalamotomy as an effective treatment option for focal hand dystonia. In this study, we undertake an open-label clinical trial to further establish MRgFUS Vo-complex thalamotomy as an effective treatment for focal hand dystonia with greater attention paid to potential motor costs associated with this treatment. To elucidate pathophysiology of dystonia and treatment mechanisms, neurophysiological and MRI analysis will be performed longitudinally to explore the hypothesis that neuroplastic and structural changes that may underlie this treatment benefit., Methods and Analysis: A total of 10 participants will be recruited into this open-label clinical trial. All participants will undergo clinical, kinemetric, neurophysiological and radiological testing at baseline, followed by repeated measures at predesignated time points post MRgFUS Vo-complex thalamotomy. Further, to identify any underlying structural or neurophysiological abnormalities present in individuals with focal hand dystonia, 10 age and gender matched control participants will be recruited to undergo comparative investigation. These results will be compared with the intervention participants both at baseline and at 12 months to assess for normalisation of these abnormalities, if present., Ethics and Dissemination: This trial was reviewed and approved by the St Vincent's Health Network Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH00778). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at both national and international conferences., Trial Registration Number: CTRN12622000775718., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Status dystonicus (SD) is a life-threatening condition., Objective and Methods: In a dystonia cohort who developed status dystonicus, we analyzed demographics, background dystonia phenomenology and complexity, trajectory previous to-, via status dystonicus episodes, and evolution following them., Results: Over 20 years, 40 of 328 dystonia patients who were receiving DBS developed 58 status dystonicus episodes. Dystonia was of pediatric onset (95%), frequently complex, and had additional cognitive and pyramidal impairment (62%) and MRI alterations (82.5%); 40% of episodes occured in adults. Mean disease duration preceding status dystonicus was 10.3 ± 8 years. Evolution time to status dystonicus varied from days to weeks; however, 37.5% of patients exhibited progressive worsening over years. Overall, DBS was efficient in resolving 90% of episodes., Conclusion: Status dystonicus is potentially reversible and a result of heterogeneous conditions with nonuniform underlying physiology. Recognition of the complex phenomenology, morphological alterations, and distinct patterns of evolution, before and after status dystonicus, will help our understanding of these conditions. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)

Successful interaction with the environment requires flexible updating of our beliefs about the world. By estimating the likelihood of future events, it is possible to prepare appropriate actions in advance and execute fast, accurate motor responses. According to theoretical proposals, agents track the variability arising from changing environments by computing various forms of uncertainty. Several neuromodulators have been linked to uncertainty signalling, but comprehensive empirical characterisation of their relative contributions to perceptual belief updating, and to the selection of motor responses, is lacking. Here we assess the roles of noradrenaline, acetylcholine, and dopamine within a single, unified computational framework of uncertainty. Using pharmacological interventions in a sample of 128 healthy human volunteers and a hierarchical Bayesian learning model, we characterise the influences of noradrenergic, cholinergic, and dopaminergic receptor antagonism on individual computations of uncertainty during a probabilistic serial reaction time task. We propose that noradrenaline influences learning of uncertain events arising from unexpected changes in the environment. In contrast, acetylcholine balances attribution of uncertainty to chance fluctuations within an environmental context, defined by a stable set of probabilistic associations, or to gross environmental violations following a contextual switch. Dopamine supports the use of uncertainty representations to engender fast, adaptive responses., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Dopamine (DA) is a neurotransmitter with an important influence on learning and memory, which is thought to be due to its modulatory effect on plasticity at central synapses, which in turn depends on activation of D1 and D2 receptors. Methods of brain stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS; paired associative stimulation, PAS) lead to after-effects on cortical excitability that are thought to resemble long-term potentization (LTP)/long-term depression (LTD) in reduced preparations. In a previous study we found that block of D2 receptors abolished plasticity induced by tDCS but had no effect on the facilitatory plasticity induced by PAS. We postulated that the different effect of D2 receptor block on tDCS- and PAS-induced plasticity may be due to the different focality and associativity of the stimulation techniques. However, alternative explanations for this difference could not be ruled out. tDCS also differs from PAS in other aspects, as tDCS induces plasticity by subthreshold neuronal activation, modulating spontaneous activity, whereas PAS induces plasticity via phasic suprathreshold stimulation. The present study in 12 volunteers examined effects of D2 receptor blockade (sulpiride (SULP) 400 mg), on the LTP/LTD-like effects of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS), which has less restricted effects on cortical synapses than that of PAS, and does not induce associative plasticity, similar to tDCS, but on the other hand induces cortical excitability shifts by suprathreshold (rhythmic) activation of cortical neurons similarly to PAS. Administration of SULP blocked both the excitatory and inhibitory effects of intermittent (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS), respectively. As the reduced response to TBS following SULP resembles its effect on tDCS, the results support an effect of DA on plasticity, which might be related to the focality and associativity of the plasticity induced.