Search

344 Background: IROC is an expanding multi-institution collaborative database which includes socioeconomic, genomic, pathologic, clinical and laboratory data in metastatic RCC patients (pts), primarily in the modern setting. Elevated baseline NLR is now an established poor prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but currently has limited practical use. We hypothesized that an increase in NLR of 3 or more (NLR Failure) at 2 months on therapy could be a predictor of eventual treatment failure and shorter overall survival and thus augment the utility of this marker. Methods: Patients with complete data on NLR at time = 0 and +2 months of therapy were analyzed. Information on comorbidities, previous therapy, demographics were collected for adjusted analysis. NLR failure was defined as an increase of 3 or more compared to baseline NLR. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the risk of progression and death with NLR failure at 2 months (+/- 2 weeks). Kaplan Meier graphs were constructed to trace survival functions for PFS and OS by NLR. Results: Among 165 pts; 121 were eligible (Table). NLR failure at 2 months was associated with a highly statistically significant increase in the risk of death in < 1 year (HR 6.82, 95% CI [3.16-14.70], p

328 Background: Anti-PD1/PDL1 immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) is active in advanced clear cell RCC, but not all patients benefit. Preclinical studies with the combination of hypomethylating agents and CPI resulted in reversal of immune evasion and tumor regression. We examined the combination of the hypomethylating agent guadecitabine (subcutaneously on Days 1-5), with the anti-PDL1 antibody durvalumab (intravenously at flat dose of 1500 mg on Day 8) in 28 day cycles in advanced RCC in a single arm trial. Methods: In the phase Ib portion (n=6; presented previously), guadecitabine dosing of 45 mg/m2/day was selected as maximum tolerated dose. For the phase II portion of Cohort 1 (36 pts with no prior CPIs), eligible patients had metastatic RCC with clear cell component, ECOG PS of 0-1, and measurable disease by RECIST 1.1. We present pooled efficacy and toxicity data for the 42 CPI-naive pts from the phase Ib and phase II portions. An exploratory Cohort 2 (N=16) consisting of CPI-refractory pts is enrolling. Results: Of the 42 pts, 71% were men, median age was 67 years, ECOG PS was 0 in 57%, IMDC risk group was intermediate in 83% and poor in 17%, and histology was mixed in 21%. At a median follow-up of 20.1 m, best RECIST 1.1 response was PR in 9 pts (22%); SD in 25 pts (61%); PD in 7 pts (17%); and non-evaluable in 1 pt. Response categories were identical by irRECIST. Clinical benefit defined as either PR or SD ≥6 months was seen in 66%. Median OS had not been reached and median PFS was 17 m. Treatment was generally well tolerated with asymptomatic neutropenia the most frequent AE attributed to guadecitabine (38.1%), and asymptomatic lipase elevation the most common AE from durvalumab (11.9%). Grade 4 AEs were noted in 50.0% pts, grade 3 59.5%. Immune-mediated AEs were generally mild (all ≤ grade 3), included pruritus (14.3%), rash (14.3%), asymptomatic amylase or lipase elevations (16.7%), hypothyroidism (11.9%), diarrhea (16.7%), dyspnea (16.7%), pneumonitis (4.8%), myalgia (4.8%), and transaminitis (9.6%). Laboratory peripheral blood profiling (done at baseline, C1D8, C2D8) was associated on univariate unadjusted analysis at baseline with response in two major PBMC subsets - MDSCs (negative) and ILCs (positive). Further functional analysis revealed that increased expression of IL-22 in both CD4 and CD8 positive T cells positively correlated with response. Associations were noted for toxicity with IL-22 expressed by CD8-CD4- T cells, and CTLs T-bet level. Baseline archival tumor tissue next generation sequencing results will be presented. Conclusions: Guadecitabine in combination with durvalumab was well tolerated and had reasonable activity in first-line advanced ccRCC. MDSCs and regulatory T lymphocytes decreased in responders, increased Th17 subpopulations of T cells were associated with immune-mediated toxicities. Further study of this combination in CPI-refractory RCC pts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03308396 .

5 Background: HPV is associated with 30 - 50% of penile cancers, with some studies showing improved outcomes in these patients. This study evaluated the effect of HPV infection on penile cancer outcomes. Methods: The national cancer database (NCDB) was utilized to identify HPV tested penile cancer patients at the time of diagnosis from 2004 – 2016. Chi-squared tests and Cox regression models were used in analysis. Results: Out of 486 patients with penile squamous cell cancer, 139 (29%) were HPV +ve, and 347 (71%) were HPV -ve. Greater than 50% of HPV +ve were < 65 years old, Caucasian, from low-income areas ( < $48,000), and had public or no insurance. Similar incidence patterns were noted in HPV- ve patients. 77% pts who were HPV +ve had a moderate to poorly differentiated tumor. Most HPV +ve presented with early-stage cancer, and 12% were stage IV at diagnosis. 5-year overall survival (OS) was better among HPV +ve 62% vs. 50% in HPV -ve patients. Multivariable analysis (MVA) shows superior survival among patients with age < 65 years, low comorbidity score (0-1), and earlier stage at diagnosis. Patients with HPV +ve adjusted for age, comorbidities, stage, and treatment showed significantly improved survival. HPV -ve patients had 1.49 times increased risk of death compared to HPV +ve. Conclusions: HPV positive penile cancer is associated with significantly improved survival independent of age, comorbidities, stage, and treatment modality. This study reiterates the prognostic significance of HPV status and testing for HPV status at diagnosis should be a standard practice. [Table: see text]

322 Background: Hypoxia induced factor 1α/2α (HIFs) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are overexpressed in ccRCC and associated with increased tumor angiogenesis, vascular instability and drug resistance. In xenografts, high dose SLM resulted in sustained down regulation of HIFs, normalization of tumor vasculature that resulted in increased drug delivery, and therapeutic synergy with anti-VEGF therapeutic. These effects were highly SLM dose, sequence, and schedule dependent. Methods: After completion of the escalating phase I (3+3) trial, the non-toxic SLM dose of 4000μg was administered orally twice daily (BID) for 14 days, followed by once daily in combination with axitinib 5 mg BID. The primary endpoint is safety and the secondary end point include overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). To assess the potential effects of SLM on tumor vascular function, dual energy computed tomography (DECT) was conducted at baseline, day 14 of SLM, and at 3 months of SLM + axitinib. Results: Thirty subjects are screened. Of whom 25 have efficacy data (3 subjects screen failure, 1 withdrew, 1 taken off study prior to first scan due to progression with brain lesions likely present prior to study entry). 13/25 (52%) have confirmed response (CR/PR). Two subjects had CR lasting for at least 35 and 44 months, 6 subjects achieved stable disease (SD) lasting at least 6 months accounting for disease control rate (DCR) of 76%, mPFS is 9.5 months. 5/30 patients have sarcomatoid features, all of which are evaluable for efficacy with 1 PR achieved (20%). In the 20 patients without sarcomatoid features, 12/20 achieved PR (60%). The most prevalent adverse events (AE) included fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, nausea, hoarseness, weight loss, and hypertension. No deaths nor grade 4 toxicities observed. The blood selenium concentrations achieved in the 4000μg SLM dose cohorts are similar to those determined molecularly and therapeutically synergistic with axitinib in xenografts and are being achieved clinically without significant toxicity. DECT data demonstrated increased iodine uptake by tumor lesions, but not in normal tissues, on day 14 SLM treatment and decreased in these same lesions at 3 months of SLM/axitinib. Conclusions: Blood selenium concentrations and duration of treatment seem to be critical determinants of response. Pre and concurrent treatment with SLM enhance the ORR and PFS of axitinib, with no additional toxicity. Currently documented responses are similar across IMDC risk groups. Clinical trial information: NCT02535533 .

256 Background: PARP inhibitors, olaparib and rucaparib recently improved survival outcomes (in the Profound and Triton-2 trials) in pts with aPC harboring HRRm. Notably, ~35% of pts screened for the PROfound trial did not meet eligibility solely due to the lack of adequate quality/quantity of tumor tissue required for CGP (De Bono, NEJM, 2020). cfDNA analysis non-invasively assesses tumor-derived genomic alterations. We evaluated the prevalence of HRRm in a real-world aPC population, who had commercially available cfDNA assay results available. Methods: cfDNA based CGP (using a clinically-validated 73- to 74-gene panel i.e. Guardant360 or G360) from consecutive aPC pts between 11/2016–8/2020 were used for detection of HRRm. Frameshift and nonsense mutations were included as pathogenic. Variants of unknown significance were excluded. In this unmatched study, the prevalence of each HRRm was compared with those reported in literature using the chi square test. Results: cfDNA CGP from 7701 aPC pts were available for interrogation of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, & from 4671 aPC pts for ATM mutations. Prevalence of BRCA1 and 2 as detected by cfDNA was similar to historical CGP of primary tissue. Prevalence of BRCA1 was higher than historical CGP of metastatic tissue. Prevalence of ATM in cfDNA was higher than historic tumor tissue CGP but similar to prior reports from cfDNA testing (Table). Conclusions: In this large real-world population of pts with aPC undergoing routine cfDNA CGP by a CLIA certified lab, prevalence of HRRm was similar (or higher for BRCA1 and ATM) to what has been previously reported from the tumor tissue. These data provide the rationale for utilizing cfDNA CGP as a routine test for detection of HRRm in men with aPC to identify men who are candidates for PARPi. [Table: see text]

To report a multi-institutional case series of patients with advanced microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) prostate adenocarcinoma identified with clinical cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and MSI-H tumor detected by a commercially available cfDNA NGS assay Guardant360 (G360, Guardant Health) at eight different Academic Institutions in the USA, from September 2018 to April 2020. From a total of 14 MSI-H metastatic prostate cancer patients at participating centers, nine patients with mCRPC with 56% bone, 33% nodal, 11% liver and 11% soft-tissue metastases and a median PSA of 29.3 ng/dL, were treated with pembrolizumab after 2 lines of therapy for CRPC. The estimated median time on pembrolizumab was 9.9 (95% CI 1.0 to 18.8) months. Four patients (44%) achieved PSA50 after a median of 4 (3–12) weeks after treatment initiation including three patients with >99% PSA decline. Among the patients evaluable for radiographic response (n=5), the response rate was 60% with one complete response and two partial responses. Best response was observed after a median of 3.3 (1.4–7.6) months. At time of cut-off, four patients were still on pembrolizumab while four patients discontinued therapy due to progressive disease and one due to COVID-19 infection. Half of the patients with PSA50 had both MSI-H and pathogenic alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in their G360 assays. The use of liquid biopsy to identify metastatic prostate cancer patients with MSI-H is feasible in clinical practice and may overcome some of the obstacles associated with prostate cancer tumor tissue testing. The robust activity of pembrolizumab in selected patients supports the generalized testing for MSI-H.

TPS5590 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a clinically validated therapeutic target for the imaging and treatment of mCRPC. AMG 160 is an HLE BiTE immune therapy designed to redirect T cells to cancer cells by binding to PSMA on cancer cells and CD3 on T cells. BiTE immune therapy leads to direct tumor cell killing, T-cell activation and expansion, and the creation of a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment. Combining AMG 160 with a PD-1 inhibitor may enhance antitumor activity by enabling sustained T-cell-dependent killing of tumor cells in the inflamed tumor microenvironment. Methods: NCT03792841 is a phase I study of AMG 160 as monotherapy (part 1) and in combination with pembrolizumab (part 2) in men with histologically/cytologically confirmed mCRPC who are refractory to a novel hormonal therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, and/or apalutamide) and have failed 1–2 taxane regimens (or are medically unsuitable or have refused taxanes), who have ongoing castration with total serum testosterone ≤ 50 ng/dL, and have evidence of progressive disease. Patients who received prior PSMA radionuclide therapy may be eligible. Patients with CNS metastases, leptomeningeal disease, spinal cord compression, or active autoimmune disease will be excluded. Primary objectives are to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of AMG 160 given as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives are to characterize pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic and patient selection biomarkers, immunogenicity, and patient-reported pain and functional outcomes. The part 1 dose exploration will determine the MTD/RP2D of AMG 160. The part 1 dose expansion will confirm the safety and tolerability of the MTD/RP2D. The part 2 dose exploration will estimate the MTD/RP2D of AMG 160 in combination with pembrolizumab. Evaluation of preliminary antitumor activity will be based on RECIST 1.1 with Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 modifications, PSA response, CTC response, progression-free survival (radiographic and PSA), and overall survival. PSMA PET/CT and FDG PET/CT imaging will be used for evaluation of exploratory objectives. The study opened in February 2019 and is currently recruiting patients into both part 1 and part 2. Clinical trial information: NCT03792841 .

497 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy in MIBC is associated with improved survival compared to cystectomy alone. Recent retrospective studies indicated that secondary MIBC (non-MIBC progressed to MIBC) had worse outcome with cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy when compared to primary MIBC. To further evaluate this observation, we queried our database to assess the differential response and determine if prior use of intravesical therapy diminishes the effect of cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 387 patients diagnosed with T2-4 or N0-3 and M0 from 2000-2018 and underwent cystectomy were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, treatment and outcomes at University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center. Cox regression models were utilized to assess differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Time was calculated from cystectomy to recurrence or death due to any cause for RFS and OS, respectively. Results: Of the 387 patients, 324 patients had primary MIBC and 63 had secondary MIBC. Median follow up was 25.8 months. Intravesical therapy was administered to 98% (62/63) of secondary MIBC patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 38% (122/324) of primary MIBC patients and 21% (13/63) of secondary MIBC patients. NAC had no difference in response rates (CR and PR) for primary vs secondary MIBC (p=0.73). Additionally, there was no difference between the primary and secondary MIBC with regards to RFS (p=0.54) and OS (p=0.12) on univariate analysis. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not differ based on prior use of intravesical therapy in terms of RFS (p=0.61) or OS (p=0.40). Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy irrespective of prior use of intravesical therapy was not associated with RFS (p=0.66) or OS (p=0.15). Conclusions: Prior intravesical therapy was not associated with differential efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in secondary MIBC when compared to primary MIBC.

634 Background: Response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for renal cell cancer (RCC) remains variable, with markers like PDL1 proving unreliable. Preclinical models suggest that obesity could affect CPI outcomes. We conducted a retrospective study on the effect of obesity on outcomes in RCC patients treated with CPIs. Methods: RCC patients treated with nivolumab +/- Ipilimumab at university of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and University of Iowa (UIOWA) from 2015 - 2018 were classified according to WHO standard definition of BMI as non-obese (NOB-30Kg/m2). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the first CPI dose to date of death or to last follow up date if patients were still alive. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the first dose of CPI to date of progression or date of death and censored at last follow-up date if patients were still alive without progression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to evaluate the association between OS/PFS and obesity status, controlling for age, sex, race and number of prior therapies. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. Results: 84 patients with at least 6 months follow-up received a median of 9 doses of CPI with median follow of 72 weeks. 48 patients were NOB while 36 patients were OB, with 40 patients deceased at time of analysis. The most common response was stable disease in 45%, with CR in 5% and PR in 10% for a disease control rate of 63%. The median OS was 30 months in NOB patients and 20 months in the OB group. The 2 yr survival was 59% in the NOB group vs 28 % in the OB group with a HR of 0.60 (0.32-1.14; p=0.12). Median PFS was 13 months in the NOB group vs 7.3 months in the OB group with 2 yr PFS of 28% in the NOB group vs 5.5% in the OB group (HR 0.58 {0.35-0.98}; p=0.04). Conclusions: In this analysis of RCC patients treated with CPI, BMI < 30 predicts better OS and PFS. Further studies are required to better understand the effect of BMI on CPI outcomes in RCC.[Table: see text]

487 Background: Advanced bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary system with 5-year OS rates of 5-7%. Platinum based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors are currently available treatment options but with limited benefit. We hypothesize that combining Avelumab (anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy) with Docetaxel is safe and will lead to cancer cell death releasing neoantigens with enhanced anti-tumor immune mediated cytotoxicity. Methods: This is a phase 1b, single arm, non-randomized, open label prospective clinical trial to evaluate the combination of Avelumab and Docetaxel in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy. It has two phases: Phase 1b dose de-escalation of docetaxel (Level 0: 75, Level -1: 60 or Level -2: 45 mg/m2) with standard dose avelumab (10 mg/kg) to establish phase 2 dose in the standard 3+3 design. In the dose expansion phase, the phase 2 dose of docetaxel with avelumab will be evaluated for efficacy. The combination therapy is administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then avelumab alone is continued every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint is safety. Efficacy endpoints include objective response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Results: At the cutoff date of 10/21/2019, 10 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Only one of the six patients treated with level 0 dose of docetaxel had a dose limiting toxicity (neutropenic fever). Docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 along the avelumab was deemed safe for dose expansion cohort. Additional 4 patients were enrolled in the dose expansion cohort. Efficacy data is preliminary with 1 patient achieving CR, 2 pts had PR, 2 pts had SD, 1 pt PD and 4 pts are not yet evaluable. The most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs were febrile neutropenia, urinary tract infection and confusion. No treatment related deaths were noted. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel in combination with avelumab is safe and the preliminary data showed promising efficacy, further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03575013.

In the last two decades, the discovery of various pathways involved in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have led to the development of biologically-driven targeted therapies. Hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs), angiogenic growth factors, von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations and oncogenic miRNAs play essential roles in the pathogenesis and drug resistance of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. These insights have led to the development of VEGF inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors and immunotherapeutic agents which have significantly improved outcomes of patients with advanced RCC. HIF inhibitors will be a valuable asset in the growing therapeutic armamentarium of RCC. Various histone deacetylase (HDAC)inhibitors, including selenium and agents such as PT2385 and PT2977, are being explored in various clinical trials as potential HIF inhibitors to ameliorate the outcomes of RCC patients. In this article, we will review the current treatment options and highlight the potential role of selenium in the modulation of drug resistance biomarkers expressed in ccRCC tumors.

BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive and commonly encountered brain tumors. Standard of care includes surgical resection with adjuvant or concurrent chemoradiation which is predominantly based on adult clinical trials. Our study objective was to assess whether survival differed in AYA compared to older adults. METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with at least surgically resected glioblastoma from 2004 to 2016. Cox regression models were utilized to estimate the effect of treatment on overall survival (OS) while accounting for immortal time bias (3-months) and clustering within facility. RESULTS Among 51,718 patients with glioblastoma identified, 2,930 patients were AYA. Multivariable analysis (MVA) shows OS was significantly higher in AYA, female, non-white, high income, unilateral cancer patients with private insurance receiving treatments in high volume facilities. OS among AYA patients was significantly lower in surgery + (radiation or chemotherapy: S+(RT or CT) group compared to surgery only (S) (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.06–1.65), but no significant survival difference between surgery + chemoradiation (S+C+RT) groups and surgery only (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.83–1.14). Median survival is ~28 months in AYA among S and S+C+RT groups whereas significantly lower survival (median OS ~18 months) is seen in S+RT or CT. Non-AYA patients were at 2 times increased risk of death compared to AYA patients who received the same type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, AYA population has more than twice the median OS in comparison to non-AYA patients. Worse overall survival was seen among S+RT or CT in comparison to S and S+RT+CT in AYA group. For patients needing either chemotherapy or radiation with surgery, possibly a trimodal approach might provide better survival advantage. Prospective studies are needed to further explore optimal treatment modalities in this unique population.

Background The overexpression of hypoxia induced factor 1a/2a in ccRCC leads to up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that results in increased angiogenesis, tumor metastasis, and treatment resistance. Using several preclinical xenograft models, it has been demonstrated that therapeutic doses and schedules of the selenium-containing molecules, seleno-L-methionine (SLM) and methylselenocysteine caused enhanced degradation of HIF1α/2α, down-regulation of oncogenic miRNA-210 and 155, up-regulation tumor suppressor miRNA-664 and LET-7b, and stabilization of tumor vasculature, yielding higher tumor drug uptake and protection from toxic side effects when combined with chemotherapeutic and VEGF-targeted agents. Methods This is a phase I (3 + 3 design) dose finding trial of SLM (2500, 3000 or 4000 µg) given orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by once a day in combination with standard dose axitinib to patients with metastatic ccRCC. Primary endpoint is safety; secondary endpoint is efficacy including overall response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Results Twelve evaluable patients (pts) with metastatic ccRCC who progressed on one or more prior lines of treatment were enrolled. The first 3 pts were treated at 4000 µg, the second and third 3 pts were treated at 2500 and 3000 µg respectively. Additional 3 pts were added to 4000 µg. No dose limiting toxicity was seen. Most common AEs included fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, anorexia, cough, proteinuria and weight loss. Of the 4000 µg cohort, 2 pts achieved complete response with ongoing responses at 31 and 29 months, 1 pt had partial response (PR) for 24 months. Of the 2500 µg cohort, 1 pt with ongoing PR for 21 months. The 3000 µg cohort, one pt has ongoing PR for 12 months. Conclusions SLM of 4000 µg is safe and the recommended phase 2 dose in combination with standard dose axitinib. The combination has promising efficacy with phase 2 trial is ongoing. Further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial identification NCT02535533. Legal entity responsible for the study Yousef Zakharia. Funding Holden Comprehensive Cancer Centre. Disclosure Y. Zakharia: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche Diagnostics; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Jansen; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Exelixis; Advisory / Consultancy: Castle Bioscience; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Array. M. Milhem: Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Trieza; Advisory / Consultancy: Biontech; Advisory / Consultancy: Blueprint Medicines Corporation; Advisory / Consultancy: Immunocore; Advisory / Consultancy: Array. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4) and programmed death cell protein 1 (anti-PD1) have revolutionized cancer treatment. As ICI use becomes widespread, more immune-related adverse events (irAE's) are being reported. Our aim was to investigate the frequency and nature of new irAE's as well as report the frequency of flare-ups of pre-existing autoimmune conditions occurring after ICI therapy. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients treated for cancer with anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 or combination therapy at our tertiary care center from January 2014 to April 2016. Demographic data, cancer type and stage, irAE's (new immune disorders and disease flares of pre-existing autoimmune disorders on ICI therapy), and drug treatment information were extracted. We identified 220 patients treated with ICI therapy during the study period out of which 27% (60/220) developed irAE's. 11% in anti-CTLA4 group and 16% among anti-PD1 treated patients developed irAE's. IrAE's resulted in discontinuation of cancer therapy in 28% of those who developed irAE's. 21.4% had a flare of their autoimmune disease but only 1 required discontinuation of immunotherapy. IrAE's are an important emerging clinical disease entity for specialists to be aware of. Our study shows that ICI's can be safely used in patients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions with close monitoring. However, there is still a large unmet need to have a better understanding of how to systematically evaluate and manage patients with irAE's as well as for identifying the predictors of irAE's.

660 Background: The overexpression of hypoxia induced factor 1a/2a in ccRCC leads to up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that results in increased angiogenesis, tumor metastasis, and treatment resistance. Using several preclinical xenograft models, it has been demonstrated that therapeutic doses of the selenium-containing molecules, seleno-L-methionine (SLM) and methylselenocysteine (MSC) caused enhanced degradation of HIF1α/2α, down-regulation of oncogenic miRNA-210 and 155, up-regulation tumor suppressor miRNA-664 and LET-7b, and stabilization of tumor vasculature, yielding higher tumor drug uptake and protection from toxic side effects when combined with chemotherapeutic and VEGF-targeted agents. Methods: This is a phase I (3+3 design) dose finding trial of SLM (2500, 3000 or 4000 µg) given orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by once a day in combination with standard dose axitinib to patients with metastatic RCC. Primary endpoint is safety. Secondary endpoint is efficacy including overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: To date, 12 evaluable patients (pts) with metastatic RCC who progressed on one or more prior lines of treatment were enrolled. The first 3 pts were treated at 4000 µg, the second and third 3 pts were treated at 2500 and 3000 µg respectively. Additional 3 pts were added to 4000 µg. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen. Most common AEs included fatigue, diarrhea, hypertension, nausea, anorexia, cough, proteinuria and weight loss. Of the 4000 µg cohort, 2 pts achieved CR with ongoing responses at 31 and 29 months, 1 pt had PR for 24 months and 1 had PD at 3 months, 2 pts are not assessed yet. Of the 2500 µg cohort, 1 pt with ongoing PR for 21 months, 1 pt had stable disease for 6 months, and 1 pt had PD at 2 months. The 3000 µg cohort, one pt has ongoing PR for 12 months; another pt had PR lasting 10 months, the 3rd pt had SD for 4 months. Conclusions: High dose SLM is safe in combination with axitinib, with promising efficacy. Further data including biomarkers will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02535533.

In the last two decades, the discovery of various pathways involved in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to the development of biologically-driven targeted therapies. Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), angiogenic growth factors, von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) gene mutations, and oncogenic microRNAs (miRNAs) play essential roles in the pathogenesis and drug resistance of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. These insights have led to the development of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic agents, which have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with advanced RCC. HIF inhibitors will be a valuable asset in the growing therapeutic armamentarium of RCC. Various histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, selenium, and agents like PT2385 and PT2977 are being explored in various clinical trials as potential HIF inhibitors, to ameliorate the outcomes of RCC patients. In this article, we will review the current treatment options and highlight the potential role of selenium in the modulation of drug resistance biomarkers expressed in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) tumors.

e12544Background: Recent studies indicated that aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) modulators - such as omeprazole - decrease breast cancer cell invasion among mice with estrogen receptor negative (ER...

e15084Background: Checkpoint inhibitors are approved as effective therapy in a number of malignancies. The response rates range between 20-40% in various cancers. Predictive as well as prognostic c...

Diabetes mellitus (DM) serves as an important prognostic indicator in patients with cardiac-related illness. Our objective is to compare survival and neurological outcomes among diabetic and non-diabetic patients who were admitted to the hospital after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant articles from database inception to July 2018 without any language restriction. Studies were included if they evaluated patients who presented with OHCA, included mortality and neurological outcome data separately for DM patients and Non-DM patients and reported crude data, odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR). Two investigators independently reviewed the retrieved citations and assessed eligibility. The quality of included studies was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort studies. Random-effect models using the generic variance method were used to create pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value. Survival and neurological outcomes (using modified rankin scale and cerebral performance category scale) after OHCA in hospitalized patients with DM compared with patients without DM. Out of 57 studies identified, six cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. In an analysis of unadjusted data, patients with DM had lower odds of survival, pooled OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52–0.78, [I2 = 90%]. When adjusted ORs were pooled, the association between DM and survival after OHCA was still significantly reduced, pooled OR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.68–0.89 [I2 = 55%]. Unadjusted pooled OR revealed poor neurological outcomes in patients with DM, pooled OR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.38–0.80 [I2 = 90%]. The result demonstrates significant poor outcomes of in-hospital survival and neurological outcomes among DM patients after OHCA.

630 Background: The overexpression of hypoxia induced factor (HIF) 1a/2a in ccRCC leads to up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that results in increased angiogenesis, tumor metastasis, and treatment resistance. Using several preclinical xenograft models, it has been demonstrated that therapeutic doses and schedules of the selenium-containing molecules, seleno-L-methionine (SLM) and methylselenocysteine (MSC) caused enhanced degradation of HIF1α/2α, down-regulation of oncogenic miRNA-210 and 155, up-regulation tumor suppressor miRNA-664 and LET-7b, and stabilization of tumor vasculature, yielding higher tumor drug uptake and protection from toxic side effects when combined with chemotherapeutic and VEGF-targeted agents. Methods: This is a phase I (3+3 design) dose finding trial of SLM (2500, 3000 or 4000 µg) given orally twice daily for 14 days, followed by once a day in combination with the standard dose of axitinib to patients with metastatic RCC. Primary endpoint is safety, secondary endpoint is efficacy including overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: To date, 9 patients with metastatic RCC; who failed one or more prior lines of treatment; are enrolled. The first 3 patients were treated at 4000 µg, the second and third 3 patients were treated at 2500 and 3000 µg respectively. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) is encountered. Six patients are evaluable to date. Of the 4000 µg cohort, 2 patients achieved complete remission (CR) at 18 and 20 months, 1 patient with partial response (PR) at 19 month. Of the 2500 µg cohort, one patient achieved PR at 9 months, 1 patient had stable disease for 9 months before progression, and 1 patient had disease progression at 4 months. The 3000 µg cohort is too early to evaluate for efficacy. Of interest the 4000μg SLM dose yielded a plasma selenium concentration of 40-50μM which is comparable with SLM dose determined synergistic with anti-cancer drugs in preclinical models. Conclusions: High dose SLM is safe in combination with axitinib, with promising efficacy, further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT02535533.

Urothelial carcinoma, the most common histologic subtype of bladder cancer in the United States, most frequently presents as non–muscle invasive disease. Initially, therapy involves transurethral endoscopic resection and subsequent intravesical therapies with extended surveillance for high-risk disease. Even with the best treatments, recurrence and progression can occur. However, metastasis of non–muscle invasive bladder cancer to distant sites without evidence of progression or regional metastasis is rare. In this article, we present the case of a patient with high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma who developed an unusual metastasis to the mandible, confirmed by GATA-3 immunostaining, over 4 years after initial transurethral resection. Prior to the development of metastatic disease, this patient had no evidence of local recurrence during maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin intravesical therapy and concurrent surveillance. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography taken after presentation with mandibular metastasis did not show any evidence of regional metastasis. This case highlights an unusual location for distant metastasis of urothelial carcinoma occurring in a patient without evidence of muscle invasive disease or regional metastasis. We additionally highlight the utility of GATA-3 immunostaining in identifying urothelial carcinoma histologically.

Dabigatran is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant that has been approved for atrial fibrillation and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Its use has been increasing in the USA since serum drug levels do not need monitoring. To date, no significant skin side effects have been reported other than 4 cases of non-specific skin lesion and 2 cases of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV), which is a small vessel inflammatory disease that presents as palpable purpura in lower extremities. We present a man aged 57 years with chronic deep vein thrombosis who developed palpable purpura, petechiae, swelling in lower extremities, torso and distal upper extremities on the third day after dabigatran initiation. The present case highlights the potential risk for LCV with dabigatran use and provides insight into its management.

543 Background: ER+ breast cancer (BC) by virtue of tumor dormancy can present with delayed recurrences, frequently years after initial diagnosis. Methods: Over 2,500 charts of ER+/HER2 negative BC...

Introduction Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) accounts for approximately 30% of the non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. However, DLBCL has heterogeneous clinical, histological, and molecular features. It has been identified that the clinical features and the treatment response vary with genetic and molecular features that affect disease aggressiveness. Gene rearrangements and more recently protein expressions involving MYC, BCL2 or BCL6 have been shown to have major prognostic implications. Lymphomas with recurrent chromosomal breakpoints activating multiple oncogenes, (one being MYC), are often referred to as “Double hit” lymphomas (DHL). Objectives The current study aims to identify patients with DLBCL for the presence of co-expression of proteins involving MYC with BCL2 and/or BCL6, corresponding translocations and their prognostic impact on response to therapy and overall survival. Methods Patients were retrospectively identified by reviewing tumor registries and pathology records at the Cleveland Clinic Health system for any of the diagnoses between January 1998 and December 2011: Burkitt-like lymphoma; Aggressive B-cell lymphoma NOS; “B-cell lymphoma unclassifiable with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt's lymphoma”; High-grade B-cell lymphoma; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with aggressive features and Diffuse aggressive lymphoma NOS. Data collected included Clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis, Immunohistochemistry, Cytogenetics, type of treatment received, response in terms of complete and partial remission and survival data. Patients aged < 18 years and with the diagnosis of low grade lymphoma and Burkitt's lymphoma were excluded from the study. Results Data from 65 patients diagnosed between June 2001 and February 2012 were available for analysis. Overall 52% of patients were male, median age at diagnosis was 69 yrs (range 36-89 yrs), and most had good ECOG performance status (82% ECOG 0, 1). Most patients had DLBCL (83%), and majority of the patients were stage 3 or 4 (63%). The most common sites of extranodal disease were bone marrow (26%), followed by Genitourinary (15%), and muscle (15%). The majority of patients were in the International Prognostic Index (IPI) poor risk group (53%) Positive MYC protein expression or translocation was found in 16 (24%) patients. 7 patients had DHL with 5 patients having MYC/BCL2 translocations, 1 patient-MYC/BCL6 and 1 patient with MYC/BCL2/ BCL6 ( Triple hit) translocations. 9 patients had MYC protein expression with or without translocation with co-expression of either BCL2 or BCL6 protein. 81% (53/65) of patients had BCL2 expression (14 had translocation), 65% (42/65) had BCL6 expression (7 had translocation), and 24% (16/65) had MYC protein expression (12 had translocation). 25 patients (38%) had a single protein expression; of which 14 patients had BCL2, 10 patients had BCL6 and 1 patient had MYC. 24 patients (37%) were positive for both BCL2 and BCL6 co-expression; of which 5 patients had positive translocations by FISH. 61 % (40/65) of the patients did not have FISH studies following immunohistochemistry. Overall 92% (60/65) of patients received systemic treatment, primarily RCHOP (73%). Only 54 patients had follow up data after treatment. 59% of the patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 22% had a best response of partial remission (PR), and 17% did not respond to treatment. 30 patients (54%) died with an estimated median overall survival of 58.9 months (26.6-127.7 months). As with response to chemotherapy, patients with a single protein expression with either BCL2 or BCL6, or co-expression with both BCL2/BCL6 had similar outcomes in terms of overall survival (79.9 vs 70.6 months) and CR (70% vs. 79%). Whereas, patients with protein expression/ translocation involving MYC tended to have poorer outcomes: 19% (3/16) had CR ( p=.0005) and estimated median survival of 11.5 months (p=.005). Conclusion Diffuse large B cell lymphomas involving co-expression of MYC protein with BCL2 or BCL6 have a significantly lower survival rate compared to the patients with single protein expression of BCL2 or BCL6 as well as co-expression of BCL2 and BCL6. In addition to obtaining cytogenetic studies, we emphasize the need to conduct prospective clinical trials which can aim at the optimal treatment strategies for this subset of DLBCL patients expressing the MYC proto-oncogene with BCL2 and/or BCL6 proteins. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

MDS typically affects older adults, and hereditary factors have been considered less contributory to disease pathogenesis. Moreover, their impact is obscured by the complexity of the clinical presentation and history. Similarly, familial MDS and pediatric MDS is rare and likely distinct from adult MDS occurring in younger adults. Younger MDS patients (pts), excluding those who present with treatment-related disease, may represent a distinct subtype of MDS characterized by a specific molecular pattern of lesions. We compared two groups of MDS pts focusing on pathological diagnosis at presentation, family history of solid malignancies and blood disorders (Leukemia and MDS) in first and second degree relatives, cytogenetic abnormalities and somatic mutations. Our analysis of 1030 MDS pts included MDS, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) pts. Overall the median age at presentation of this population was 71years (range 14-100); we classified the younger subset as those falling into the lower 8thpercentile of age to identify. Accordingly, the younger population was characterized by age less than 50 years (range 14-49; median age 41), and the older population age ≥ 50years (range 50-100; median age 75). Treatment-related MDS was excluded. Younger MDS pts more frequently presented with higher-risk disease compared to the older population (46% vs. 31%; P=.004). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to family history of cancers (40 vs. 47%; P=.21) and blood disorders (10 vs. 6%; P= .1). When we compared cytogenetic abnormalities between these patient subsets, there was no difference in detection of rate of abnormal cytogenetics (53% vs. 52%; P=.5) or complex karyotype (23 vs. 25%; P=.86). However, del 20q was more common in the older subset (19 vs. 6%; P=.03). We then investigated somatic mutational patterns using new generation deep sequencing for the 60 most commonly encountered MDS mutations (defined in the 200 MDS exome cohort presented in other abstract from our group). Data were available for 26 younger pts and 179 older pts. By analyzing comprehensive mutational spectrum, the average number of somatic mutational events (mean; 2.4/case) was significantly higher in the older subgroup compared to the younger (1.8/case; P In sum, 8% of MDS pts present at a younger age in our cohort. MDS in younger pts presents with more advanced disease and is less commonly affected by del20q- and TET2 mutations, consistent with less common myeloproliferative features in this population. Disclosures: Makishima: AA & MDS international foundation: Research Funding; Scott Hamilton CARES grant: Research Funding.

e15537 Background: The GPA is a commonly used prognostic index based on RTOG protocols in patients with brain metastases (BM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of GPA index in a contemporary cohort of renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases (RCCBM) at a larger tertiary care center to predict overall survival. Methods: IRB approval was obtained and the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center’s database was used to identify RCCBM patients (pts) treated in the recent era (2000-12). A proportional hazards model was used to assess OS, which was measured from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases to death or last follow-up. Results: 136 RCCBM (100 males), median age 60 years (range 32-79), were evaluated. Pts had a median of 2 (range 1-15) BM; Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 90-100 in 57%, 70-80 in 38% and 3).GPA was not prognostic for survival (p=.40), and neither GPA coding of KPS nor BM (1, 2-3, >3) was associated with outcome (p=.90 and .26, respectively). In contrast, diagnosis of RCC to BM >5 years, p=.004, brain as an initial site of metastasis, p=.005, normal hemoglobin, p=.01, a single BM, p=.02, controlled primary, p=.02, and age≤65 were found to be independently prognostic for improved OS. Using these factors, an alternative index can be formed. Conclusions: RCCBM specific GPA was notprognostic for OS in this study (p=.40), however a new index was developed based on a revised set of independent prognostic factors that was significant (p

e15023 Background: Small cell carcinoma (SCCB) is an aggressive tumor and presents in an advanced stage. In this retrospective study we analyze the patterns of treatment and survival among elderly patients (age>75 years). Methods: We identified 38 patients who were diagnosed with primary SCCB at our institution and its affiliated hospitals between 1995-2010. Out of which 15 patients were above the age of 75 years. For each patient histological, demographic and clinical data were obtained by chart review. Deaths of all patients were confirmed by social security death index (SSDI). Staging of all patients were categorized as limited (T1-4N0-1M0) or extensive stage (TxNxM1 or TxN2-3M0). Results: 15 patients were identified with pure small cell carcinoma of bladder. Mean age of patients was 80 years ( ranged from 76 years to 90 years). Male to female ratio was 5:1. 86% were caucasians. Among patients with available clinical information, 5 out of 15 patients (33.3%) had extensive stage and remaining 10 had limited stage SCCB. Around 73% (11/15) of the patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). One patient had partial cystectomy and three patients had radical cystectomy. All three pateints who underwent radical cystectomy had limited disease and had an overall median survival (OMS) of 27 months. Patients with TURBT had a OMS of 6 months. Conclusions: Prognosis for patients with SCCB remains poor. Careful selection of patients for radical cystectomy with limited disease may improve overall median survival among elderly population with SCCB.

9086 Background: The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) is a commonly used prognostic index in patients with brain metastases (BM). GPA for melanoma consists of Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and the number of BM present. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of GPA index in a contemporary cohort of patients (pts) with MBM at a single institution to predict Overall Survival (OS). Methods: With IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center’s database was used to identify pts with MBM treated between 2000-2012. The primary endpoint was OS from diagnosis of MBM. Cox proportional hazards models were used for data analysis. Stepwise variable selection was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: 90 MBM (51 females) median age 57 years (range 24-87) were included for analysis. The median number of BM was 2 (range, 1-11). KPS was 90-100(52%), 70-80 (43%) and

2096 Background: The Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) is a commonly used prognostic index based on RTOG protocols in patients with brain metastases (BM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors to predict for overall survival (OS) in breast cancer BM (BCBM) treated at a single tertiary care center. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center’s database was used to identify BCBM who were treated in the recent years (2000-12). A proportional hazards model was used to assess OS, which was measured from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases to death or last follow-up. Results: 161 BCBM (160 females) median age 52 years (range 27-84) were included for analysis. 48% of patients were ER positive, 31% were PR positive, 50% were HER2 positive while 31% of patients were triple negative. The median number of BM was 2 (range, 1-15). Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) of the patient was 90-100 in 50%, 70-80 in 47%) and