51. Evaluation of a MetOp ASCAT-Derived Surface Soil Moisture Product in Tundra Environments
- Author
-
Elin Högström, Annett Bartsch, Birgit Heim, Helena Bergstedt, and Georg Pointner
- Subjects
In situ ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Backscatter ,Soil Moisture ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Permafrost ,02 engineering and technology ,Permafrost, Cryosphere, and High-Latitude Processes ,Atmospheric sciences ,Biogeosciences ,01 natural sciences ,Standard deviation ,Remote Sensing ,Arctic ,C band ,The Arctic: An AGU Joint Special Collection ,Global Change ,Water content ,Tundra ,Arctic Region ,Research Articles ,021101 geological & geomatics engineering ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Earth-Surface Processes ,Moisture ,Remote Sensing and Disasters ,15. Life on land ,Active layer ,Geophysics ,13. Climate action ,Environmental science ,Instruments and Techniques: Monitoring ,Other ,Geographic Location ,Hydrology ,Cryosphere ,Natural Hazards ,Research Article ,radar - Abstract
Satellite‐derived surface soil moisture data are available for the Arctic, but detailed validation is still lacking. Previous studies have shown low correlations between in situ and modeled data. It is hypothesized that soil temperature variations after soil thaw impact MetOp ASCAT satellite‐derived surface soil moisture (SSM) measurements in wet tundra environments, as C band backscatter is sensitive to changes in dielectric properties. We compare in situ measurements of water content within the active layer at four sites across the Arctic in Alaska (Barrow, Sagwon, Toolik) and Siberia (Tiksi), taken in the spring after thawing and in autumn prior to freezing. In addition to the long‐term measurement fields, where sensors are installed deeper in the ground, we designed a monitoring setup for measuring moisture very close to the surface in the Lena River Delta, Siberia. The volumetric water content (VWC) and soil temperature sensors were placed in the moss organic layer in order to account for the limited penetration depth of the radar signal. ASCAT SSM variations are generally very small, in line with the low variability of in situ VWC. Short‐term changes after complete thawing of the upper organic layer, however, seem to be mostly influenced by soil temperature. Correlations between SSM and in situ VWC are generally very low, or even negative. Mean standard deviation matching results in a comparably high root‐mean‐square error (on average 11%) for predictions of VWC. Further investigations and measurement networks are needed to clarify factors causing temporal variation of C band backscatter in tundra regions., Key Points Organic layer temperature variations explain temporal behavior of soil moisture derived from C band radar in unfrozen wet tundraTemporal variability of volumetric water content from in situ point measurements is representative over distances of several kilometers in tundraNear‐surface volumetric water content predicted from matched ASCAT data has an average RMSE of 11% across five sites in Alaska and Siberia
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF