Search

Irinotecan is an anti-neoplastic agent that is widely used for treating colorectal and lung cancers, but often causes toxicities such as severe myelosuppression and diarrhea. In this study, we performed a two-stage case-control association study for irinotecan-induced severe myelosuppression (grades 3 and 4). In the first stage, 23 patients who developed severe myelosuppression and 58 patients who did not develop any toxicity were examined for 170 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 14 genes involved in the metabolism and transport of irinotecan. A total of five SNPs were identified to show the possible association with severe myelosuppression (P(Fisher)

Purpose The use of erlotinib after gefitinib failure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not clearly clarified in clinical practice. We sought to compile the available clinical reports to better understand the effectiveness of erlotinib after failure of gefitinib. Methods We searched published reports including erlotinib and gefitinib. Eleven reports were identified (published between November 2004 and December 2008). Advanced NSCLC who documented progressive disease (PD) for gefitinib 250 mg/day, received erlotinib 150 mg once daily. Results A total of 106 patients were pooled from these studies. Asian was observed in 70.8%, women in 72.6%, adenocarcinoma in 85.1%, never smoker in 75.3%. In erlotinib therapy, there was observed in 9.9% in partial response (PR), 18.9% in stable disease (SD) and 70.8% in PD. Disease control (DC) rate for gefitinib and erlotinib was 71.7% and 29.2%, respectively. No significant difference of disease control rate (37.5% vs 21.7%, p = 0.1503) and response rate (6.3% vs 8.7%, p = 1.000) was observed between patients with EGFR mutations and those with wild type EGFR. The significantly different response on erlotinib therapy was observed in patients who had shown SD for gefitinib therapy (p = 0.0095) and those who had a PFS of more than 6 months during gefitinib treatment (p = 0.0261). The common toxicities were skin rash and diarrhea. Conclusion Erlotinib may produce clinical benefits in patients who had shown long SD on prior gefitinib therapy. Moreover, EGFR mutations were not positive predictors for erlotinib response after gefitinib failure.

732 Background: Panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in second-line chemotherapy increased objective response rate and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus FOLFIRI alone in patients with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Peeters et al, J Clin Oncol 2010). This trial (UMIN000004659) evaluated tolerability and efficacy of combination therapy with irinotecan and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine (IRIS) plus panitumumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with WT KRASmCRC. Methods: Main inclusion criteria were: patients with WT KRAS mCRC refractory to one prior chemotherapy regimen for mCRC, ECOG PS 0-2, and age ≥20 years. Patients received panitumumab (6 mg/m2) and irinotecan (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (40-60 mg according to body surface area) twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was completion rate of protocol therapy (CRT). The secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled in 9 centers. The overall CRT was 62.2% (23/37). Most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were: skin rash (24%), diarrhea (16%), and appetite loss (11%). The overall RR was 32.4% (12/37). Of these, four patients underwent conversion surgery. Median PFS and OS were 9.5 months (95% CI: 3.5-15.4 months) and 20.1 months (95% CI: 16.7-23.2 months), respectively. Conclusions: IRIS plus panitumumab has acceptable toxicity profile and promising efficacy in patients with previously treated WT KRAS mCRC. This regimen can be an additional treatment option for second-line chemotherapy in WT KRAS mCRC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004659.

76 Background: Tokushukai group has a nation-wide network of 67 affiliated hospitals, and has started an “oncology project” to improve the quality of cancer care using web-based SRS and CCR systems. Methods: Every institution has been introduced the same electric-medical-record (EMR) to share the unified code to order chemotherapy regimens, and patient data could be collected on a database in the central office. 141 recommended regimens for 15 types of solid tumor have been approved in the cancer committee consisting of working-group and program-evaluation members. In breast cancer, 31 recommended regimens (7 for adjuvant and 24 for metastatic settings) were selected from the NCCN guidelines and approved by the committee. Not only recommended but also non-recommended regimens have their own specific codes in EMR, and the patterns of care in the selection of chemotherapy regimen were examined. Results: In 2011, 21 of 67 hospitals utilized these systems. 71.8% of 2,676 patients with cancer including 753 with colorectal, 317 with breast, 273 with gastric, 144 with non-small cell lung, 123 with pancreatic, and 73 patients with esophageal cancer had received 97 types of recommended therapies (11,022 cycles). In terms of breast cancer, 86% of 388 patients had been treated with recommended regimens (1,994 cycles). Among 71 patients received non-recommend therapies, only 6 patients (1.5%) had been treated with three regimens which were not regarded as standard regimens. Conclusions: The introduction of web-based SRS and CCR systems in a large medical group could facilitate standard chemotherapy regimen by an accurate examination of current treatment patterns.

Highlights • A case of an infected tracheal diverticulum presenting as a paratracheal mass is demonstrated. • An infected tracheal diverticulum can impair the airway and require emergency intervention including surgery. • The most commonly described procedure of surgery is resection via a transverse or lateral neck incision and drainage of the abscess. • A CT scan plays important roles to make a diagnosis and evaluate the necessity of intervention., Introduction Recent advancement in radiological imaging has revealed an increasing amount of asymptomatic abnormalities. Tracheal diverticula are relatively rare entities and are incidentally found on radiological imaging such as computed tomography. Here, we present a case of an infected tracheal diverticulum presenting as a paratracheal mass, which required emergency intervention. Case presentation A 65-year-old Japanese nonsmoker man presented with a fever, lower neck pain, and the aggravation of dyspnea for a week. An enhanced computed tomography scan demonstrated that the trachea was displaced by a paratracheal mass with a well-defined thin wall. His respiratory status was so urgent that emergency intubation and surgical drainage of the abscess were performed. A computed tomography scan performed 4 days after admission demonstrated shrinking of the abscess, and he was extubated and discharged 7 days after admission without any complications. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to confirm an infected tracheal diverticulum presenting as a paratracheal abscess, which required emergency intervention. Moreover, computed tomography plays an important role in the differentiation of paratracheal masses.