Search

Background: Rearranged during transfection ( RET ) rearrangements occur in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Alectinib administered at doses of 300 mg and 600 mg twice daily (BID) is approved for., Alk: rearranged NSCLC in Japan and other countries, respectively. Since alectinib has activity against RET, we conducted a phase (P) 1/2 study of alectinib to determine its activity in Japanese patients with., Ret: rearranged NSCLC., Methods: This study was a single-arm, open-label, multi-institutional P1/2 trial. Previously treated patients with RET -rearranged NSCLC, screened by nation-wide network (LC-SCRUM-Japan), were recruited. In P1, alectinib (600 or 450 mg BID) was administered following a 3+3 design and its safety was assessed. During P2, alectinib was administered at the recommended dose (RD) determined in P1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in RET inhibitor-naïve patients treated with the RD of alectinib., Results: Thirty-four patients were administered alectinib. In cohort 1 (600 mg BID) of P1, we observed 5 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), including grade 3 rash and thromboembolic event, in 3 of 6 patients. In cohort 2 (450 mg BID), we observed no DLTs in 3 patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that AUC 0-10 to 600 mg BID was higher than that previously reported in global trials. We determined 450 mg BID as the RD for P2. In 25 RET inhibitor-naïve patients, one achieved an objective response (4%) and 13 achieved disease control at 8 weeks (52%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.4), while the median overall survival was 19.0 months (5.4-NE). We observed grade 3 adverse events (AEs) (4%) including pneumonitis in P2., Conclusions: Alectinib exerts limited activity against RET -rearranged NSCLC. Further investigation to elucidate the mechanisms underlying sensitivity and resistance of RET inhibitors is required to improve outcomes for these patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-549). Dr. NY, Dr. YH, and Dr. MM reports personal fees from Chugai Pharma, outside the submitted work. Dr. TS reports grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharma, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, grants and personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer Japan, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharma, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Fuji Pharma, personal fees from Hisamitsu Pharma, personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, personal fees from Mochida Pharma, personal fees from Nippon Kayaku, personal fees from Ono Pharma, personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, personal fees from Showa Yakuhin Kako, personal fees from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, personal fees from Takeda Pharma, grants from Astellas Pharma, grants from Bayer Yakuhin, grants from Merck Serono, grants from MSD, grants from Verastem, grants from Yakult, outside the submitted work. Dr. SM reports grants and personal fees from Astellas Pharma, grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharma, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, grants from Chugai Pharma, grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Amgen Astellas BioPharma, grants from Eisai, grants from Ono Pharma, grants from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, grants from MSD, grants from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from Taiho Pharma, grants from Takeda Pharma, grants from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr. K Yoh reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Taiho Pharma, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from Ono Pharma, grants from Bayer, grants from Novartis, grants from Takeda Pharma, outside the submitted work. Dr. KG reports grants and personal fees from Chugai, grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharma, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Ono Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, grants from MSD, grants from Quintiles, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants from OxOnc, grants from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, grants from Takeda Pharma, grants from Astellas Pharma, grants from Eisai, grants from Amgen Astellas BioPharma, personal fees from Yakult Honsha, personal fees from Novartis Pharma, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. Dr. MN reports grants and personal fees from Chugai, grants and personal fees from Taiho Pharma, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Ono Pharma, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Healthcare, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Astellas, outside the submitted work. Dr. K Yoshimura reports personal fees from Chugai Pharma, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr. SY reports grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharma, grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thyroid ultrasound screening for children aged 0 to 18 years was performed in Fukushima following the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. As a result, many thyroid cancer cases were detected. To explore the carcinogenic mechanisms of these cancers, we analyzed their clinicopathological and genetic features., Methods: We analyzed 138 cases (52 males and 86 females) who had undergone surgery between 2013 and 2016 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital. Postoperative pathological diagnosis revealed 136 (98.6%) cases of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC)., Results: The BRAFV600E mutation was detected using direct DNA sequencing in 96 (69.6%) of the thyroid cancer cases. In addition, oncogenic rearrangements were detected in 23 cases (16.7%). Regarding chromosomal rearrangements, 8 (5.8%) RET/PTC1, 6 (4.3%) ETV6(ex4)/NTRK3, 2 (1.4%) STRN/ALK, and 1 each of RET/PTC3, AFAP1L2/RET, PPFIBP/RET, KIAA1217/RET, ΔRFP/RET, SQSTM1/NTRK3 and TPR/NTRK1 were detected. Tumor size was smaller in the BRAFV600E mutation cases (12.8 ± 6.8 mm) than in wild-type BRAF cases (20.9 ± 10.5 mm). In the BRAFV600E mutation cases, 83 (86.5%) showed lymph node metastasis, whereas 26 (61.9%) of the wild-type BRAF cases showed lymph node metastasis., Conclusions: The BRAFV600E mutation was mainly detected in residents of Fukushima, which was different from post-Chernobyl PTC cases with RET/PTC3 rearrangement. PTC with the BRAFV600E mutation was smaller but was shown in the high rate of central cervical lymph node metastasis than the wild-type BRAF PTC in the young population of Fukushima., (© Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: RET rearrangements are an emerging targetable oncogenic fusion driver in NSCLC. However, the natural history of disease and activity of different classes of systemic therapy remain to be defined. Furthermore, molecular testing for RET is not yet routine, and the optimal method of testing is unclear. We present a comparative analysis of molecular profiling with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) and treatment outcomes., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. Baseline demographics and treatment outcomes were collected., Results: A total of 64 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range: 25-85), 56% were women, 77% were of Chinese ethnicity, 95% had adenocarcinoma, and 69% were never smokers. RET rearrangement was detected by FISH in 30 of 34 patients (88%), NGS in 40 of 43 patients (93%), and with discordant results in seven of 13 patients (54%) tested with both methods. Of 61 patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent disease, prevalence of central nervous system metastases was 31% and 92% received palliative systemic therapy. Overall survival was prolonged in patients treated with a selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus untreated patients (median 49.3 versus 15.3 mo; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06-0.40, p < 0.001). However, it was not different in patients treated with immunotherapy versus untreated patients (median 37.7 versus 49.3 mo; HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.53-3.19, p = 0.53). Overall survival was also prolonged in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion versus those with KIF5B-RET fusion (median 113.5 versus 37.7 mo; HR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.38, p = 0.009)., Conclusions: In RET-rearranged NSCLC, selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is associated with improved survival outcomes, especially in patients with CCDC6-RET fusion. However, immunotherapy has poor efficacy. NGS and FISH testing methods may also result in substantial discordance., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Rearranged during transfection (RET) proto-oncogene gene fusions are rare in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy with other chemotherapy regimens in patients with NSCLC with different RET fusion subtypes., Patients and Methods: A retrospective, multicenter study of patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinomas was conducted. RET rearrangements were detected using next generation sequencing. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC and the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens. We also evaluated the efficacy between groups of patients with and without KIF5B-RET-rearranged lung cancer., Results: We evaluated 62 patients with NSCLC and RET rearrangements, including 41 with KIF5B-RET, 15 with CCDC6-RET, and 6 with other rare fusion subtypes. Of these 62 patients, 50 had stage IIIB/IV. We also evaluated 40 patients with first-line chemotherapy information available. The median progression-free survival was significantly different between those receiving pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and those receiving other chemotherapy regimens (9.2 vs. 5.2 months; P = .007). The median progression-free survival for patients with KIF5B-RET fusion and non-KIF5B-RET fusion was not significantly different statistically (7.8 vs. 11.2 months; P = .847). For second-line chemotherapy, a statistically significant difference was found between the chemotherapy regimens (4.9 vs. 2.8 months; P = .049). Survival follow-up data were available for 38 patients with advanced NSCLC. The median overall survival was 26.4 months. The overall survival of the patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC who had received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy versus no pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was 35.2 versus 22.6 months (P = .052). No difference in survival was observed between the patients with KIF5B-RET and non-KIF5B-RET rearrangements., Conclusions: Pemetrexed-based treatment should be considered first when selecting the chemotherapy regimen for patients with NSCLC and RET rearrangements., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Since the first discovery of rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion in lung adenocarcinoma in 2011, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors, namely vandetanib and cabozantinib, are currently available. Despite favorable outcomes in systemic control, the intracranial therapeutic response remains insufficient. In this study, the clinical characteristics and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with RET rearrangements were analyzed., Methods: Patients with NSCLC harboring RET fusion who received treatment between January 2006 and January 2018 were analyzed. RET rearrangement was identified by FISH or NGS., Results: A total of 59 patients were identified. About half of the patients were female (47.5%) and never smokers (50.9%). Most patients had adenocarcinoma (89.8%). A total of 17 patients (28.8%) had an intracranial lesion at the initial diagnosis of stage IV disease, and 11 additional patients (18.6%) developed intracranial metastases during follow-up. The median time to development of intracranial metastases was 19.0 months (95% CI: 9.6-28.5), resulting in a >60% cumulative incidence of brain metastasis at 24 months. The systemic efficacy of pemetrexed-based regimens was favorable with progression-free survival of 9.0 (95% CI: 6.9-11.2) and OS of 24.1 (95% CI: 15.2-33.0) months. The median progression-free survival for vandetanib and immunotherapy was 2.9 (95% CI: 2.0-3.8) and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.6) months, respectively., Conclusions: Given the likelihood of RET-rearranged NSCLC progressing to intracranial metastases and the absence of apparent clinical benefit of currently available targeted or immunotherapeutic agents, development of novel treatment with higher selectivity and better penetration of the blood-brain barrier remains a priority., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

• A series of nicotinamide naphthyridine analogs identified as potent RET inhibitors. • HSN608, a lead compound, inhibited various mutant RET enzymes better than Alectinib, Vandetanib and Apatinib in vitro. • HSN608 inhibited the growth of RET-driven LC-2/ad cell line with IC50 of ~3 nM. RET rearrangement is a recently identified oncogenic mutation in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) that accounts for approximately 2% of all NSCLCs. More than six fusion partners have been identified in NSCLC, such as KIF5B, CCDC6, NCOA4, TRIM33, CLIP1 and ERC1. Many RET inhibitors have been reported and some have progressed to the clinic. Similar to most kinase inhibitors, patients often respond to current RET inhibitors but relapse can occur due to the emergence of mutant RET kinases, such as RET (S904F) and (V804L/M), which are resistant to inhibition. Our group previously reported that the benzamide aminonaphthyridine HSN356, a multikinase inhibitor, also inhibited RET. In this study, we prepared various nicotinamide analogs of HSN356 and investigated RET inhibition to uncover the salient moieties on HSN356 that are important for kinase inhibition and to also evaluate if HSN356 and analogs thereof could inhibit mutant RET kinases, such as RET (S904F) and (V804L/M). Compound 3 (HSN608), the nicotinamide analog of HSN356, inhibits RET and mutant forms better than reported RET inhibitors such as Alectinib, Sorafenib, Vandetanib and Apatinib, and comparable to BLU667. HSN608 inhibited the growth of CCDC6-RET driven LC-2/ad cell line with IC50 of ~3 nM. Under similar conditions, BLU667 and vandetanib (two drugs being evaluated against RET-driven cancers in the clinic) inhibited the growth of LC-2/ad with IC50 values of ~10 and 328 nM respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In ret proto-oncogene (RET)-rearranged lung cancers, data on the frequency of brain metastases and, in particular, the outcomes of multikinase inhibitor therapy in patients with intracranial disease are not well characterized., Methods: A global, multi-institutional registry (cohort A, n = 114) and a bi-institutional data set (cohort B, n = 71) of RET-rearranged lung cancer patients were analyzed. Patients were eligible if they had stage IV lung cancers harboring a RET rearrangement by local testing. The incidence of brain metastases and outcomes with multikinase inhibitor therapy were determined., Results: The frequency of brain metastases at the time of diagnosis of stage IV disease was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18%-32%) in all patients from both cohorts. The lifetime prevalence of brain metastasis in stage IV disease was 46% (95% CI: 34%-58%) in patients for whom longitudinal data was available. The cumulative incidence of brain metastases was significantly different (p = 0.0039) between RET-, ROS1-, and ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK)-rearranged lung cancers, with RET intermediate between the other two groups. Although intracranial response data was not available in cohort A, the median progression-free survival of multikinase inhibitor therapy (cabozantinib, vandetanib, or sunitinib) in patients with brain metastases was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3-2.9 months, n = 10). In cohort B, an intracranial response was observed in 2 of 11 patients (18%) treated with cabozantinib, vandetanib (± everolimus), ponatinib, or alectinib; the median overall progression-free survival (intracranial and extracranial) was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.0-4.9 months)., Conclusions: Brain metastases occur frequently in RET-rearranged lung cancers, and outcomes with multikinase inhibitor therapy in general are suboptimal. Novel RET-directed targeted therapy strategies are needed., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rearranged during transfection (RET)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is relatively rare and the clinical and computed tomography (CT) image characteristics of patients with an advanced disease stage have not been well documented., Patients and Methods: We identified patients with advanced-stage RET-rearranged NSCLC treated in the Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, and analyzed the clinical and CT imaging characteristics., Results: In 21 patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC, RET rearrangements were identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The fusion partner genes were identified as KIF5B (57%), CCDC6 (19%), and unknown (24%). CT imaging showed that 12 primary lesions (92%) were peripherally located and all were solid tumors without ground-glass, air bronchograms, or cavitation. The median size of the primary lesions was 30 mm (range, 12-63 mm). Of the 18 patients with CT images before initial chemotherapy, 12 (67%) showed an absence of lymphadenopathy. Distant metastasis included 13 with pleural dissemination (72%), 10 with lung metastasis (56%), 8 with bone metastasis (44%), and 2 with brain metastasis (11%)., Conclusion: Advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC manifested as a relatively small and peripherally located solid primary lesion with or without small solitary lymphadenopathy. Pleural dissemination was frequently observed., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Since the discovery in 2012 of rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene gene (RET) rearrangements in NSCLC, at least 12 different fusion variants have been identified, with kinesin family member 5B gene (KIF5B)-RET being the most frequent and the best characterized. Unlike ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) and ROS1 rearrangements, RET fusion genes cannot be adequately detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC), although fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction are fully complementary diagnostic tools. In large retrospective studies, RET rearrangements correlate with adenocarcinoma histologic subtype, never-smoking status, younger age, more advanced disease stage, potentially higher chemosensitivity (in particular, to pemetrexed-based regimens), and coexistence of other genomic alterations. To date, several preclinical models, clinical trials, and retrospective studies have investigated multitarget inhibitors with anti-rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene (RET) activity in patients with RET-rearranged lung cancer. In the clinical setting, the benefit in terms of response (16%-47%) and progression-free survival (2-7 months) is clearly not comparable to that seen with other targeted agents in oncogene-addicted NSCLC. Furthermore, multikinase agents showed high rates of severe toxicities, leading to frequent dose reduction and drug discontinuation. To date, no definitive conclusions about a potentially different impact of anti-RET therapies according to RET fusion variants have been drawn on account of discordant data coming mostly from small subgroup analyses. Importantly, the absence of a striking clinical benefit in RET oncogene-addicted NSCLC underscores the clear need for development of more selective and potent RET inhibitors and for better characterization of concomitant genomic alterations and mechanisms of resistance to RET inhibition in patients with lung cancer., (Copyright © 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Rearrangements of RET are rare oncogenic events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While the characterization of Asian patients suggests a predominance of nonsmokers of young age in this genetically defined lung cancer subgroup, little is known about the characteristics of non-Asian patients. We present the results of an analysis of a European cohort of patients with RET rearranged NSCLC., Methods: Nine hundred ninety-seven patients with KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype lung adenocarcinomas were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for RET fusions. Tumor specimens were molecularly profiled and clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected., Results: Rearrangements of RET were identified in 22 patients, with a prevalence of 2.2% in the KRAS/EGFR/ALK wildtype subgroup. Co-occurring genetic aberrations were detected in 10 patients, and the majority had mutations in TP53. The median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 39-80 years; mean ± SD, 61 ± 11.7 years) with a higher proportion of men (59% versus 41%). There was only a slight predominance of nonsmokers (54.5%) compared to current or former smokers (45.5%)., Conclusions: Patients with RET rearranged adenocarcinomas represent a rare and heterogeneous NSCLC subgroup. In some contrast to published data, we see a high prevalence of current and former smokers in our white RET cohort. The significance of co-occurring aberrations, so far, is unclear., (Copyright © 2015 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)