Search

Here we report the discovery, by high-throughput screening, of three novel (2-amino-5-keto)thiazole compounds that act as selective potentiators of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Compound selectivity was assessed at seven human nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (alpha1beta1gammadelta, alpha2beta4, alpha3beta2, alpha3beta4, alpha4beta2, alpha4beta4, and alpha7) expressed in mammalian cells or Xenopus oocytes. At alpha2beta4, alpha4beta2, alpha4beta4, and alpha7, but not alpha1beta1gammadelta, alpha3beta2, or alpha3beta4, submaximal responses to nicotinic agonists were potentiated in a concentration-dependent manner by all compounds. At similar concentrations, no potentiation of 5-hydroxytryptamine, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, GABA(A), and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors or voltage-gated Na(+) and Ca(2+) channels was observed. Furthermore, these compounds did not inhibit acetylcholine esterase. Further profiling revealed that these compounds enhanced the potency and maximal efficacy of a range of nicotinic agonists at alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, a profile typical of allosteric potentiators. At concentrations required for potentiation, the compounds did not displace [(3)H]epibatidine from the agonist-binding site, and potentiation was observed at all agonist concentrations, suggesting a noncompetitive mechanism of action. Blockade of common second messenger systems did not affect potentiation. At concentrations higher then required for potentiation the compounds also displayed intrinsic agonist activity, which was blocked by competitive and noncompetitive nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonists. These novel selective nicotinic receptor potentiators should help in clarifying the potential therapeutic utility of selective nAChR modulation for the treatment of central nervous system disorders.

Background: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem., Objective: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis., Methods: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo., Results: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups., Conclusions: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes.

Ibandronate is a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that is currently available as a daily and once-monthly oral formulation for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. It has recently been approved for intermittent intravenous administration. The oral iBandronate Osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe (BONE), Monthly Oral iBandronate In LadiEs (MOBILE), and Dosing IntraVenous Administration (DIVA) trials demonstrated that long-term daily and intermittent administration of ibandronate was efficacious for increasing bone mineral density and reducing markers of bone turnover. BONE demonstrated that ibandronate reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures and reduced the relative risk of nonvertebral fractures in higher-risk patients. Histomorphometric evaluations in the BONE and DIVA trials have demonstrated that bone quality is maintained following treatment. Giving patients the option of choosing their dose regimen and route of administration may increase overall adherence to treatment, leading to enhanced fracture protection in patients with osteoporosis.

Objective: Osteoporosis is a significant health problem in postmenopausal women. Consequently, new and effective therapies are being sought to preserve bone mass and prevent osteoporosis in this population of women. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of lasofoxifene with raloxifene and placebo on indices of bone health in postmenopausal women., Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active treatment-controlled study of 2 years duration was conducted. Women included 410 postmenopausal women aged 47 to 74 years. The four treatment groups were: lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, or 1.0 mg/day, raloxifene 60 mg/day, or placebo daily. All women received daily calcium and vitamin D supplements. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline to 2 years in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in all women having baseline and at least one follow-up bone density measurement. Total hip BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and safety were also evaluated in all women., Results: Both doses of lasofoxifene significantly increased lumbar spine BMD compared with raloxifene (P < or = 0.05) and with placebo treatment (P < or = 0.05). Least squares mean increases (95% CI) from baseline in lumbar spine BMD, compared with placebo, were 3.6% (1.9, 5.2) for lasofoxifene 0.25 mg/day, 3.9% (2.4, 5.5) for lasofoxifene 1.0 mg/day, and 1.7% (0.3, 3.0) for raloxifene. The two doses of lasofoxifene and raloxifene were equally effective at increasing total hip BMD. Lasofoxifene and raloxifene significantly reduced the levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover compared with placebo. In general, the effects of lasofoxifene were greater than the responses to raloxifene. At 2 years, lasofoxifene significantly (P < or = 0.05) reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 20.6% and 19.7% with 0.25 mg/day and 1 mg/day, respectively, compared with raloxifene (12.1%) and placebo (3.2%). Lasofoxifene and raloxifene had a similar adverse event profile with low rate of discontinuations due to adverse events., Conclusions: Lasofoxifene may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for the prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Oral daily bisphosphonates carry a potential for gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events, which has been partly addressed by introducing once-weekly regimens. Nevertheless, the need to follow inconvenient dosing instructions every week could still hinder long-term compliance and therapeutic outcome. In addition, survey data indicates that many patients would prefer a once-monthly rather than once-weekly bisphosphonate dosing regimen. Ibandronate is a potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate specifically developed for less frequent administration. In a pivotal study in postmenopausal osteoporosis, oral ibandronate, administered daily or with a between-dose interval of >2 months, demonstrated robust antifracture efficacy and an overall incidence of upper GI adverse events similar to placebo, even in patients at increased risk of such events. This and other clinical studies conducted in postmenopausal women demonstrate that oral ibandronate has an excellent upper GI safety profile.

Objective: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design., Research Design and Methods: This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire., Results: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). 'Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time' was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose 'it is easier to tolerate side effects' as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients' preferences.

A G-protein coupled receptor to niacin (nicotinic acid) was identified recently but the physiological/pharmacological role of the receptor remains poorly defined. We present our studies to demonstrate that HM74A, but not HM74, binds niacin at high affinities and effectively mediates Gi signaling events in human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells as well as in 3T3L1 adipocytes expressing HM74A. Furthermore, HM74A, but not HM74, expressed in differentiated 3T3L1 adipocytes effectively mediated inhibition of lipolysis by niacin. Our results provided direct evidence indicating that HM74A, but not HM74, was sufficient to mediate anti-lipolytic effect of niacin in adipose tissue.

Rationale: To increase subtype selectivity and provide a novel means to alter receptor function, we discovered and characterization potentiators for the metabotropic glutamate 2 receptor (mGlu2)., Methods and Results: A class of 3-pyridylmethylsulfonamides (e.g., 3-MPPTS; 2,2,2-trifluoro-N-[3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)phenyl]-N-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-ethanesulfonamide) were found to be potent, subtype-selective potentiators of human and rat mGlu2. The sulfonamides increased agonist potency in functional assays but did not displace orthosteric radiolabeled antagonist or agonist binding to cloned mGlu2 receptors. Rather, the modulators increased the affinity of most of the orthosteric agonists including glutamate, DCG-IV (2S,2'R,3'R)-2-(2',3'-dicarboxylcyclopropyl)glycine), and LY354740 (1S,2S,5R,6S-2-aminobicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-2,6-bicaroxylate monohydrate). In striatal brain slices, LY354740 inhibited evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) equally well following either a low- (0.06 Hz) or high (4 Hz)-frequency stimulation of corticostriatal afferents. In contrast, the mGlu2 potentiator cyPPTS (2,2,2-trifluoro-N-[3-(cyclopentyloxy)phenyl]-N-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-ethanesulfonamide) inhibited striatal EPSPs only at higher frequencies of stimulation (2 and 4 Hz). Several sulfonamides including 4-MPPTS, 4-APPES (N-[4-(4-carboxamidophenoxy)phenyl]-N-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-ethanesulfonamide hydrochloride monohydrate) and/or CBiPES N-[4'-cyano-biphenyl-3-yl)-N-(3-pyridinylmethyl)-ethanesulfonamide hydrochloride) were tested in mGlu2/3 agonist-sensitive rodent model(s) of anxiety and psychosis. As seen with LY354740, both 4-MPPTS and 4-APPES were efficacious in a rat fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Likewise in mice, CBiPES attenuated a stress-induced hyperthermia and PCP-induced hyperlocomotor activity. Furthermore, CBiPES mediated alteration in PCP-induced hyperlocomotor activity was sensitive to mGlu2/3 antagonist pretreatment., Conclusions: Taken together, the data indicate mGlu2 receptor potentiators have a unique use-dependent effect on presynaptic glutamate release, and show efficacy in several mGlu2/3-sensitive animal models of psychiatric disorders.

Objectives: BONE (oral iBandronate Osteoporosis vertebral fracture trial in North America and Europe) determined whether less frequent dosing of ibandronate (dose-free interval > 2 months) provided similar antifracture efficacy to daily dosing. As osteoporosis medications must be effective across different populations, an additional objective of BONE was to investigate and report the effect of oral ibandronate in North American and European women, as described here., Patients and Methods: BONE was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fractureprevention study in 2946 postmenopausal women (age 55 years-80 years; > or = 5 years since menopause) with osteoporosis (low lumbar spine bone mineral density and one to four prevalent vertebral fractures [T4-L4]). Participants received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) plus either placebo, oral daily ibandronate (2.5 mg) or oral intermittent ibandronate (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 months). The efficacy and tolerability of ibandronate were assessed independently in both North American and European populations., Results: Consistent, significant efficacy was observed in the North American (new vertebral fracture risk reduction: 60% and 54% with daily and intermittent ibandronate, respectively) and European patient populations (50% and 48%, respectively). Both ibandronate regimens also significantly reduced the incidence of new, worsening, and acute clinical, vertebral fractures. Daily and intermittent ibandronate significantly increased bone density at the spine in both North American (5.4% and 4.4% vs. baseline with daily and intermittent ibandronate, respectively) and European (7.1% and 6.3% vs. baseline, respectively) populations. Significant increases were also observed for total hip bone density (2.6% and 3.7% vs. baseline for daily, and 2.5% and 3.1% for intermittent; North American and European populations, respectively). Comparable, significant decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover (reductions in urinary excretion of C-telopeptide levels of 53.5% and 67.1% vs. baseline for daily, and 50.0% and 53.8% for intermittent; North American and European populations, respectively) were also observed in both populations (p < 0.004 for all cited measurements in each ibandronate group vs. placebo). Oral ibandronate was well tolerated in both North American and European patients, with a safety profile similar to placebo., Conclusions: Oral ibandronate, administered daily or intermittently, effectively reduced vertebral fracture risk in North American and European women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. These results demonstrate the efficacy of ibandronate administered with extended dose-free intervals, regardless of patients' geographical origin. Research investigating other less frequent ibandronate regimens, such as once-monthly oral administration, is underway.

Although relatively few G-protein-coupled receptors are Class C, in recent years, this small family of receptors has become a focal point for the discovery of new and exciting allosteric modulators. The mGlu (metabotropic glutamate) receptors are illustrative in the discovery of both positive and/or negative allosteric modulators with unique pharmacological properties. For instance, allosteric modulators of the mGlu2 receptor act as potentiators of glutamate responses in clonal expression systems and in native tissue assays. These potentiators act to increase the affinity of orthosteric agonists for the mGlu2 receptor and shift potency curves for the agonist to the left. In electrophysiological experiments, the potentiators show a unique activation-state-dependent presynaptic inhibition of glutamate release and significantly enhance the receptor-mediated increase in G-protein binding, as seen with autoradiography. Similarly, potentiators of mGlu5 have been described, as well as allosteric antagonists or inverse agonists of mGlu1 and mGlu5. Binding and activity of the modulators have recently indicated that positive and negative allosteric sites can be, but are not necessarily, overlapping. Compared with orthosteric ligands, these modulators display a unique degree of subtype selectivity within the highly conserved mGlu family of receptors and can have very distinct pharmacological properties, such as neuronal frequency-dependent activity. This short review describes some of the unique features of these mGlu1, mGlu2 and mGlu5 allosteric modulators.

Increasing evidence suggests that a high rate of bone turnover is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and is strongly linked to fracture risk. Measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover is therefore becoming a more widely used endpoint in clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporosis. This multinational double-blind, fracture-prevention study enrolled 2946 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to receive placebo or oral ibandronate administered daily (2.5 mg/day) or intermittently (20 mg every other day for 12 doses every 3 months). The primary endpoint was the incidence of new vertebral fractures after 3 years. Secondary outcome measures included changes in the rate of bone turnover as assessed by biochemical markers and increases in spinal and hip BMD. Daily and intermittent oral ibandronate significantly reduced the risk of vertebral fractures by 62% and 50%, respectively, and produced significant and sustained reductions in all the measured biochemical markers of bone turnover. By 3 months, the rate of bone turnover was reduced by approximately 50-60%, and this level of suppression was sustained throughout the remainder of the study. In summary, oral ibandronate, given daily or with a between-dose interval of >2 months, normalizes the rate of bone turnover, provides significant increases in BMD and a marked reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures. Thus, intermittent ibandronate has potential to become an important alternative to currently licensed bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Objective: The objective of this review is to present the clinical profiles of the once-weekly and once-daily dosing formulations of alendronate and risedronate, the 2 bisphosphonates currently available in the United States for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. DATA SOURCE/STUDY SELECTION: Data were obtained from a MEDLINE literature search of all English language articles published between January 1996 and April 2004 using generic names of the bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate. Results were refined by incorporating terms such as "osteoporosis," "bone mineral density," "fracture risk," and "adverse events." Randomized, controlled trials of once-daily and once-weekly bisphosphonate therapies were selected. Also selected for review were post hoc analyses and extension studies of the original controlled trials, including more recent data from published abstracts from scientific meetings., Data Extraction: Relevant portions of articles obtained from the literature search were used to summarize the efficacy and tolerability of the 2 therapies., Conclusions: In prospective trials, both bisphosphonates were effective in reducing vertebral and hip fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. In the only prospective trial evaluating hip fracture risk reduction as the primary end point, risedronate was effective at reducing hip fracture vs placebo. Both alendronate and risedronate are available in once-weekly formulations that have efficacy and tolerability profiles similar to the once-daily doses. Clinicians should review all available data for both agents as well as the medical history of the patient to make the most appropriate treatment choice.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a secreted member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Because OPG functions physiologically as a locally generated (paracrine) factor, we used high-throughput screening to identify small molecules that enhance the activity of the promoter of the human OPG gene. We found three structurally unrelated compounds that selectively increased OPG gene transcription, OPG mRNA levels, and OPG protein production and release by osteoblastic cells. Structural analysis of one compound, a benzamide derivative, led to the identification of four related molecules, which are also OPG inducers. The most potent of these compounds, Cmpd 5 inhibited osteoclast formation and parathyroid hormone-induced calvarial bone resorption. In vivo, Cmpd 5 completely blocked resorptive activity (serum calcium, osteoclast number) in parathyroid hormone-treated rats. Furthermore, Cmpd 5 reduced the ability of a rat breast cancer to metastasize to bone. Finally, the compound also prevented bone loss in a rat adjuvant arthritis model. These results provide proof of the concept that low molecular weight compounds can enhance OPG production in ways that can result in effective therapies.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg combination tablets (tramadol/APAP) as add-on therapy for subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) pain inadequately controlled by COX-2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID)., Methods: This 91-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled subjects with symptomatic OA for >/= 1 year who experienced at least moderate pain [visual analog scale (VAS) score >/= 50/100 mm] despite treatment with stable doses of celecoxib (>/= 200 mg/day) or rofecoxib (>/= 25 mg/day). Tramadol/APAP or matching placebo was titrated to 4 tablets/day on Day 10 and thereafter as needed up to 8 tablets/day. The primary efficacy measure was final VAS score; secondary measures included final pain relief rating scores, subject/investigator overall medication assessments, rate and time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, and selected quality-of-life/physical functioning scores., Results: Of 307 subjects randomized, 306 taking celecoxib (56.5%) or rofecoxib (43.5%) were included in the intent-to-treat population (n = 153 tramadol/APAP, 153 placebo). Mean final VAS scores for tramadol/APAP plus COX-2 NSAID were significantly lower than placebo plus COX-2 NSAID (41.5 vs 48.3; p = 0.025) and mean final pain relief rating scores were significantly higher (p = 0.002). Subjects taking tramadol/APAP showed significant improvements compared with placebo in subject/investigator medication assessments, as well as in the WOMAC Physical Function and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Role-Physical measures. The most common treatment-related adverse events for tramadol/APAP were somnolence (6.5%), nausea (4.6%), and constipation (3.3%). Mean tramadol/APAP dose was 4.1 tablets (154 mg tramadol/ 1332 mg APAP)., Conclusion: Tramadol 37.5 mg/APAP 325 mg combination tablets were effective and safe as add-on therapy with COX-2 NSAID for treatment of OA pain.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of alendronic acid 70mg once weekly for the treatment of male osteoporosis., Patients and Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-month trial compared the effect of alendronic acid 70mg once weekly or placebo (randomised 2 : 1) on bone mineral density (BMD) in 167 men with spine or hip BMD at least 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean for young normal white males or nontraumatic fracture. All patients received calcium and vitamin D (colecalciferol). We measured lumbar spine, hip and total body BMD, and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Fractures were collected as adverse events., Results: Alendronic acid 70mg once weekly produced significant BMD increases from baseline of 4.3% at the spine, 2.1% at the femoral neck, 2.4% at the trochanter, and 1.4% at the total body, which were all significantly greater than placebo (p < 0.05). The increase at the lumbar spine was significant relative to baseline and placebo after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). The treatment effect was consistent regardless of BMD, age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and hypogonadal status at baseline. Alendronic acid significantly decreased biochemical markers of bone turnover relative to baseline and placebo. Alendronic acid was generally well tolerated, with an incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events similar to placebo., Conclusion: Alendronic acid 70mg administered once weekly is an effective and convenient alternative to daily dosing for the treatment of male osteoporosis.

The neurotransmitter serotonin (5HT) has been shown to modulate mobility, feeding, egg-laying, and defecation behaviors in the saprophytic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Although the effects of serotonin on these behaviors in parasitic nematodes is under study, little is known about the diversity, ontogeny, signaling, and pharmacology of serotonin receptors in these organisms. In an effort to increase our understanding of this system, we cloned and characterized a novel cDNA (5HT1Hc) from the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus that has high amino acid sequence homology with known G-protein coupled 5HT1-receptors from invertebrates and vertebrates. Transcript expression studies in four development stages (egg, L1/L2, L3, and adult) revealed the presence of the mRNA in the L1/L2, L3, and adult stages. Membranes from insect cells (Sf9) expressing the 5HT1Hc-receptor cDNA displayed nanomolar binding affinity to serotonin and a unique pharmacological profile distinct from known invertebrate and mammalian 5HT-receptors. Receptor signaling studies with mammalian AV12 cells expressing the 5HT1Hc-receptor and the promiscuous G-protein, Galpha15, demonstrated dose-dependent intracellular signals with serotonin acting as an agonist. Together, these studies describe a novel invertebrate 5HT-receptor with high affinity for the indolealkylamine, serotonin, and pharmacological properties that do not conform to any known members of this superfamily of metabotropic receptors.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of discontinuing or continuing alendronate (ALN) therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) after patients on a long-term regimen of glucocorticoids (GCs) completed a 1-year treatment period with ALN., Methods: Eligible patients were individuals with GC-induced osteoporosis who had received ALN (5 or 10 mg) for 1 year in a prior clinical trial and, at the end of the year, were still taking GCs at an average daily dose of > or =7.5 mg of prednisone or equivalent. Patients were contacted 3-5 years after completion of the prior ALN trial for followup measurements of the lumbar spine BMD and hip BMD, and retrospective information was collected about serious or drug-related adverse experiences and concomitant medication use. Some patients remained on GCs, and some remained on ALN, either alone or in combination with other drugs. The primary response parameter was the percentage change in lumbar spine BMD from the end of year 1 to the followup visit. Change in BMD at the hip was a secondary response parameter., Results: Ninety (49.2%) of the eligible 183 patients participated in the retrospective study. The followup period, which began at the end of year 1 of the original clinical trial, ranged from 3.3 years to 4.6 years. The mean number of days of treatment with ALN was 507. Fifty patients were included in the analysis because they had received supraphysiologic doses of GCs (doses above the lowest tertile of GC use for the study population; that is, higher than approximately 6 mg/day), and they had not taken (defined as <6 months of use) other bone-affecting agents except ALN. Eleven of the 50 patients discontinued taking ALN (duration of use <90 days), 8 took ALN between 90 days and 300 days, and 31 continued to take ALN for >300 days after year 1 of the clinical trial. GC users who discontinued treatment with ALN (<90 days of therapy) had numerically greater decreases in BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip from the end of year 1 (mean change -5.1%, -9.2%, and -6.6%, respectively), compared with patients who continued to take ALN for >300 days (mean change 0.1%, -0.9%, and 1.8%, respectively)., Conclusion: Substantial loss of BMD in the lumbar spine and hip was seen in patients who discontinued treatment with ALN but who continued to take >6 mg/day of GCs. However, patients receiving GCs who remained on the ALN regimen appeared to benefit from continued ALN treatment, since BMD was maintained in this latter group.

Aims/hypothesis: We examined the properties of a mutant insulin receptor (IR) with an Arg(252) to Cys (IR(R252C)) substitution in the alpha-subunit originally identified in a patient with extreme insulin resistance and acanthosis nigricans., Methods: We studied IR cell biology and signalling pathways in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells overexpressing this IR(R252C)., Results: Our investigation showed an impairment in insulin binding to IR(R252C) related mostly to a reduced affinity of the receptor for insulin and to a reduced rate of IR(R252C) maturation; an inhibition of IR(R252C)-mediated endocytosis resulting in a decreased insulin degradation and insulin-induced receptor down-regulation; a maintenance of IR(R252C) on microvilli even in the presence of insulin; a similar autophosphorylation of mutant IR(R252C) followed by IRS 1/IRS 2 phosphorylation, p85 association with IRS 1 and IRS 2 and Akt phosphorylation similar to those observed in cells expressing wild type IR (IRwt); and finally, a reduced insulin-induced Shc phosphorylation accompanied by decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation and activity and of thymidine incorporation into DNA in cells expressing IR(R252C) as compared to cells expressing IRwt., Conclusion/interpretation: These observations suggest that: parameters other than tyrosine kinase activation participate in or control the first steps of IR internalisation or both; IR-mediated IRS 1/2 phosphorylation can be achieved from the cell surface and microvilli in particular; Shc phosphorylation and its subsequent signalling pathway might require IR internalisation; defective IR endocytosis correlates with an enhancement of some biological responses to insulin and attenuation of others.

To investigate the roles of insulin receptor substrate 3 (IRS-3) and IRS-4 in the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) signaling cascade, we introduced these proteins into 3T3 embryonic fibroblast cell lines prepared from wild-type (WT) and IRS-1 knockout (KO) mice by using a retroviral system. Following transduction of IRS-3 or IRS-4, the cells showed a significant decrease in IRS-2 mRNA and protein levels without any change in the IRS-1 protein level. In these cell lines, IGF-1 caused the rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of all four IRS proteins. However, IRS-3- or IRS-4-expressing cells also showed a marked decrease in IRS-1 and IRS-2 phosphorylation compared to the host cells. This decrease was accounted for in part by a decrease in the level of IRS-2 protein but occurred with no significant change in the IRS-1 protein level. IRS-3- or IRS-4-overexpressing cells showed an increase in basal phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity and basal Akt phosphorylation, while the IGF-1-stimulated levels correlated well with total tyrosine phosphorylation level of all IRS proteins in each cell line. IRS-3 expression in WT cells also caused an increase in IGF-1-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation and egr-1 expression ( approximately 1.8- and approximately 2.4-fold with respect to WT). In the IRS-1 KO cells, the impaired mitogenic response to IGF-1 was reconstituted with IRS-1 to supranormal levels and was returned to almost normal by IRS-2 or IRS-3 but was not improved by overexpression of IRS-4. These data suggest that IRS-3 and IRS-4 may act as negative regulators of the IGF-1 signaling pathway by suppressing the function of other IRS proteins at several steps.

We report here the second 2-yr extension of a clinical trial among postmenopausal women; 235 women continued blinded treatment with 5 or 10 mg alendronate daily, and 115 women who had been treated with alendronate for 5 yr were switched to blinded placebo. Continuous treatment with alendronate (10 mg daily) for 7 yr increased lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) by 11.4% compared to baseline. After the initial 18 months, each additional year of treatment through yr 7 increased spine BMD by 0.8% for the 10-mg dose and 0.6% for the 5-mg dose, with significant increases during yr 6-7. Previously reported increases in BMD at other skeletal sites and decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover remained stable during yr 6-7. Among women previously taking alendronate for 5 yr who were switched to placebo, there was no significant decline in BMD at the spine or hip, whereas small, but significant, decreases in BMD at the forearm and total body and small increases in biochemical markers were observed. The safety and tolerability profiles were similar to those of placebo. This is the largest published long-term study of antiresorptive therapy. Our findings indicate that long-term alendronate treatment is well tolerated and effective for 7 yr. Increases in spinal BMD continue for at least 7 yr, and other skeletal benefits are maintained. Discontinuation does not lead to accelerated bone loss, but continuous treatment yields better skeletal benefits than shorter treatment.

Dosing convenience is a key element in the effective management of any chronic disease, and is particularly important in the long-term management of osteoporosis. Less frequent dosing with any medication may enhance compliance, thereby maximizing the effectiveness of therapy. Animal data support the rationale that once-weekly dosing with alendronate 70 mg (7 times the daily oral treatment dose) could provide similar efficacy to daily dosing with alendronate 10 mg due to its long duration of effect in bone. In addition, dog studies suggest that the potential for esophageal irritation, observed with daily oral bisphosphonates, may be substantially reduced with once-weekly dosing. This dosing regimen would provide patients with increased convenience and would be likely to enhance patient compliance. We compared the efficacy and safety of treatment with oral once-weekly alendronate 70 mg (N=519), twice-weekly alendronate 35 mg (N=369), and daily alendronate 10 mg (N=370) in a one-year, double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women (ages 42 to 95) with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] of either lumbar spine or femoral neck at least 2.5 SDs below peak premenopausal mean, or prior vertebral or hip fracture). The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparability of increases in lumbar spine BMD, using strict pre-defined equivalence criteria. Secondary endpoints included changes in BMD at the hip and total body and rate of bone turnover, as assessed by biochemical markers. Both of the new regimens fully satisfied the equivalence criteria relative to daily therapy. Mean increases in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months were: 5.1% (95% CI 4.8, 5.4) in the 70 mg once-weekly group, 5.2% (4.9, 5.6) in the 35 mg twice-weekly group, and 5.4% (5.0, 5.8) in the 10 mg daily treatment group. Increases in BMD at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, and total body were similar for the three dosing regimens. All three treatment groups similarly reduced biochemical markers of bone resorption (urinary N-telopeptides of type I collagen) and bone formation (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) into the middle of the premenopausal reference range. All treatment regimens were well tolerated with a similar incidence of upper GI adverse experiences. There were fewer serious upper GI adverse experiences and a trend toward a lower incidence of esophageal events in the once-weekly dosing group compared to the daily dosing group. These data are consistent with preclinical animal models, and suggest that once-weekly dosing has the potential for improved upper GI tolerability. Clinical fractures, captured as adverse experiences, were similar among the groups. We conclude that the alendronate 70 mg once-weekly dosing regimen will provide patients with a more convenient, therapeutically equivalent alternative to daily dosing, and may enhance compliance and long-term persistence with therapy.

The bisphosphonate alendronate and conjugated equine estrogens are both widely used for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Acting by different mechanisms, these two agents decrease bone resorption and thereby increase or preserve bone mineral density (BMD). The comparative and combined effects of these medications have not been rigorously studied. This prospective, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial examined the effects of oral alendronate and conjugated estrogen, in combination and separately, on BMD, biochemical markers of bone turnover, safety, and tolerability in 425 hysterectomized postmenopausal women with low bone mass. In addition, bone biopsy with histomorphometry was performed in a subset of subjects. Treatment included placebo, alendronate (10 mg daily), conjugated equine estrogen (CEE; 0.625 mg daily), or alendronate (10 mg daily) plus CEE (0.625 mg daily) for 2 yr. All of the women received a supplement of 500 mg calcium daily. At 2 yr, placebo-treated patients showed a mean 0.6% loss in lumbar spine BMD, compared with mean increases in women receiving alendronate, CEE, and alendronate plus CEE of 6.0% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo), 6.0% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo), and 8.3% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo and CEE; P = 0.022 vs. alendronate), respectively. The corresponding changes in total proximal femur bone mineral density were +4.0%, +3.4%, +4.7%, and +0.3% for the alendronate, estrogen, alendronate plus estrogen, and placebo groups, respectively. Both alendronate and CEE significantly decreased biochemical markers of bone turnover, specifically urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. The alendronate plus CEE combination produced slightly greater decreases in these markers than either treatment alone, but the mean absolute values remained within the normal premenopausal range. Alendronate, alone or in combination with CEE, was well tolerated. In the subset of patients who underwent bone biopsies, histomorphometry showed normal bone histology with the expected decrease in bone turnover, which was somewhat more pronounced in the combination group. Thus, alendronate and estrogen produced favorable effects on BMD. Combined use of alendronate and estrogen produced somewhat larger increases in BMD than either agent alone and was well tolerated.

Background: Osteoporosis is a common complication of long-term glucocorticoid therapy for which there is no well-proved preventive or restorative treatment., Methods: We carried out two 48-week, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of two doses of alendronate in 477 men and women, 17 to 83 years of age, who were receiving glucocorticoid therapy. The primary end point was the difference in the mean percent change in lumbar-spine bone density from base line to week 48 between the groups. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone density of the hip, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and the incidence of new vertebral fractures., Results: The mean (+/-SE) bone density of the lumbar spine increased by 2.1+/-0.3 percent and 2.9+/-0.3 percent, respectively, in the groups that received 5 and 10 mg of alendronate per day (P<0.001) and decreased by 0.4+/-0.3 percent in the placebo group. The femoral-neck bone density increased by 1.2+/-0.4 percent and 1.0+/-0.4 percent in the respective alendronate groups (P<0.01) and decreased by 1.2+/-0.4 percent in the placebo group (P<0.01). The bone density of the trochanter and total body also increased significantly in the patients treated with alendronate. There were proportionally fewer new vertebral fractures in the alendronate groups (overall incidence, 2.3 percent) than in the placebo group (3.7 percent) (relative risk, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 4.4). Markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in the alendronate groups (P<0.001). There were no differences in serious adverse effects among the three groups, but there was a small increase in nonserious upper gastrointestinal effects in the group receiving 10 mg of alendronate., Conclusions: Alendronate increases bone density in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy.

The ability of the insulin receptor to phosphorylate multiple substrates and their subcellular localization are two of the determinants that contribute to diversity of signaling. We find that insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 is 2-fold more concentrated in the intracellular membrane (IM) compartment than in cytosol, whereas IRS-2 is 2-fold more concentrated in cytosol than in IM. Insulin stimulation induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of both IRS-1 and IRS-2. This occurs mainly in the IM compartment, even though IRS-2 is located predominantly in cytosol. Furthermore, after insulin stimulation, both IRS-1 and IRS-2 translocate from IM to cytosol with a t1/2 of 3.5 min. Using an in vitro reconstitution assay, we have demonstrated an association between IRS-1 and internal membranes and have shown that the dissociation of IRS-1 from IM is dependent on serine/threonine phosphorylation of IM. By comparison, within 1 min after insulin stimulation, 40% of the total pool of the 85-kDa subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (p85) is recruited from cytosol to IM, the greater part of which can be accounted for by binding to IRS-1 present in the IM. The p85 binding and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity associated with IRS-2 rapidly decrease in both IM and cytosol, whereas those associated with IRS-1 stay at a relatively high level in IM and increase with time in cytosol despite a return of p85 to the cytosol and decreasing tyrosine phosphorylation of cytosolic IRS-1. These data indicate that IRS-1 and IRS-2 are differentially distributed in the cell and move from IM to cytosol following insulin stimulation. Insulin-stimulated IRS-1 and IRS-2 signaling occurs mainly in the IM and shows different kinetics; IRS-1-mediated signaling is more stable, whereas IRS-2-mediated signaling is more transient. These differences in substrate utilization and compartmentalization may contribute to the complexity and diversity of the insulin signaling network.

Background: Prospective studies have shown that doses equivalent to conjugated equine estrogens of 0.625 mg/d or higher are needed to produce a significant increase in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine., Objectives: To determine the effects of unopposed esterified estrogens on bone mineral density, lipid levels, and endometrial tissue structure, and to relate these effects to changes in plasma estradiol levels., Methods: Four hundred six postmenopausal women were given calcium, 1000 mg/d, and randomly assigned to receive continuous esterified estrogens (0.3, 0.625, or 1.25 mg/d) or placebo for 24 months. Bone mineral density measurements and endometrial and laboratory assessments were conducted every 6 months; plasma estradiol concentrations were measured after 12, 18, and 24 months., Results: All doses of esterified estrogens produced significant increases in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine compared with baseline and with placebo at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Mean plasma estradiol levels increased with esterified estrogens dose, and individual subject bone mineral density changes appeared related to plasma estradiol concentrations. Clinically relevant rates of endometrial hyperplasia were noted only in the groups receiving 0.625 and 1.25 mg of esterified estrogens daily. Lipid changes were dose related and apparent in all groups., Conclusions: Esterified estrogens at doses from 0.3 to 1.25 mg/d, administered unopposed by progestin, produce a continuum of positive changes on bone and lipids. Plasma estradiol concentrations increased with esterified estrogens dose and were related to positive bone mineral densities. The 0.3-mg dose resulted in positive bone and lipid changes without inducing endometrial hyperplasia.

In the accompanying paper (Emkey, R., and Kahn, C. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31172-31181), we demonstrated that phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) treatment of Fao cells induces tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins including ErbB2 and ErbB3. In the present study we show that sphingomyelinase also results in the enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of ErbB2 and ErbB3 in these cells. In contrast to activation by PMA, the sphingomyelinase-induced phosphorylation of these proteins is independent of protein kinase C. However, both agents stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of the kinase Pyk2 suggesting that it may be involved in the PMA and sphingomyelinase activation of these ErbB proto-oncogenes. Insulin plays a negative regulatory role in the ligand and non-ligand-induced phosphorylation of the ErbB proto-oncogenes via two mechanisms. Prolonged insulin treatment resulted in decreased expression of both ErbB2 and ErbB3. Insulin also appears to negatively regulate the protein tyrosine kinase responsible for phosphorylating ErbB2 in PMA-stimulated cells. The former effect of insulin was relieved by treatment with inhibitors of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. The similarities in PMA and sphingomyelinase-induced effects and the negative regulatory role of insulin suggest a mechanism by which multiple ligands can synergize with or protect against the tumorigenic effects of phorbol esters.

The tumor-promoting phorbol ester, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), acutely stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins of approximately 190, 120, and 70 kDa in the well differentiated Fao rat hepatoma cell line. This phosphorylation is dependent on protein kinase C (PKC) and is abolished by down-regulation of PKC or pretreatment with a PKC inhibitor. Purification of the 190-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein revealed that it consists of both ErbB2 and ErbB3. Following PMA-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, ErbB2 and ErbB3 were able to associate with the SH2 domains of several signaling proteins including the p85alpha subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, Syp, and Grb2. The 120-kDa protein phosphorylated in response to PMA consists of at least two proteins: focal adhesion kinase that exhibits a minor increase in tyrosine phosphorylation following treatment with PMA, and a major 120-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated species in PMA-stimulated Fao cells which as yet is unidentified. Similarly, the 70-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated protein also appears to represent more than one protein, including paxillin and a second protein of similar mobility which appears to be the major tyrosine phosphorylation in response to PMA. Both ErbB2 and paxillin also exhibit reduced migration on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis following PMA treatment, suggesting that they are also phosphorylated on serine/threonine residues. The mobility shift of both of these proteins is abolished by treatment with inhibitors of PKC or mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-related kinase kinase. These results suggest a novel mechanism of cross-talk between the serine/threonine kinase PKC and tyrosine phosphorylation pathways. The activation of ErbB2 and ErbB3 that is initiated by PMA may contribute to the tumor promoting activity of these compounds.

Ral proteins (RalA and RalB) comprise a distinct family of Ras-related GTPases (Feig and Emkey, 1993). Recently, Ral-GDS, the exchange factor that activates Ral proteins, has been shown to bind specifically to the activated forms of RasH, R-Ras and Rap1A, in the yeast two-hybrid system. Here we demonstrate that although all three GTPases have the capacity to bind Ral-GDS in mammalian cells, only RasH activates Ral-GDS. Furthermore, although constitutively activated Ra1A does not induce oncogenic transformation on its own, its expression enhances the transforming activities of both RasH and Raf. Finally, a dominant inhibitory form of RalA suppresses the transforming activities of both RasH and Raf. These results demonstrate that activation of Ral-GDS and thus its target, Ral, constitutes a distinct downstream signaling pathway from RasH that potentiates oncogenic transformation.

We have demonstrated the presence of a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the Ras-related Ral A protein in the cytosolic fraction of brain and testis. This protein, designated Ral-GAP, was distinguished from Ras-GAP by its behavior in two chromatography systems and by the fact that the two GAP proteins did not stimulate the GTPase activity of each others target GTP binding proteins. The lack of effect of Ral-GAP on Ras GTPase activity also distinguished it from the product of the neurofibromatosis gene NF-1. Ral-GAP also differed from Rho-GAP and Rap-GAP by virtue of its elution from a gel filtration column with proteins of Mr greater than 10(6). This was likely an overestimate of the protein's molecular mass, however, since it sedimented in sucrose gradients between standard proteins of 150 and 443 kDa. Ral-GAP failed to promote the GTPase activity of mutant Ral proteins containing amino acid substitutions that in Ras lead to GAP-insensitive proteins.