Search

Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is a source of pain and discomfort in patients. It is not uncommon for patients who present with SSS to have some degree of scapular dysfunction, especially with the tightness of the pectoralis minor (PM) muscle. In this Technical Note, we demonstrate our preferred technique for arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy and partial scapulectomy with concomitant pectoralis minor release for the treatment of symptomatic SSS and PM tightness. In the treatment of these patients, PM release is beneficial because arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy or partial scapulectomy alone may result in residual scapular dyskinesis., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare, using a cadaveric model, the biomechanical properties of headless compression screws (HCSs) and HCSs augmented with a buttress plate (BP) in capitellar fractures., Methods: Twenty pairs of fresh-frozen humeri (mean age, 46.3 years; range, 33-58 years) were used. The soft tissue was removed, and a Dubberley type IA capitellar fracture was created. One specimen in each pair was randomly assigned to receive either two 2.5-mm HCSs (HCS group) or two 2.5-mm HCSs augmented with an anterior 2.4-mm BP (HCS + BP group). This resulted in a similar distribution of the left and right humeri between the groups. Cyclic loading was performed, and displacement of the capitellum at 50, 100, 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 cycles was assessed using a motion capture system. This was followed by load-to-failure testing, wherein the load at a displacement of 1 and 2 mm was recorded. Failure was defined as 2-mm displacement., Results: During cyclic loading, there were no significant differences in the displacement between the HCS and HCS + BP groups at any of the assessed cycles. During load-to-failure testing, no significant strength differences were observed in the load at 1-mm displacement between the HCS (mean: 449.8 N, 95% CI: 283.6-616.0) and HCS + BP groups (mean: 606.2 N, 95% CI: 476.4-736.0). However, a significantly smaller load resulted in a 2-mm displacement of the fragment in the HCS group (mean: 668.8 N, 95% CI: 414.3-923.2) compared with the HCS + BP group (mean: 977.5 N, 95% CI: 794.1-1,161.0)., Conclusions: Anterior, low-profile buttress plating in addition to HCSs results in a significantly higher load to failure compared with HCSs alone in a biomechanical Dubberley type IA capitellar fracture model., Clinical Relevance: The addition of an anterior BP may be considered to improve initial stability in select cases such as osteoporotic patients or when the posterolateral column is frail., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glenoid bone loss is a critical factor in the management of anterior shoulder instability (ASI). Computed tomography (CT) is often considered the gold standard to evaluate glenoid bone loss, but it is associated with negative factors such as radiation. Thus, interest exists as to when orthopaedic surgeons need a CT scan to guide decision-making when treating ASI., Purpose: To determine whether information gained from a shoulder CT scan alters orthopaedic surgeons' management plan for ASI and, secondarily, to determine whether surgeon- and patient-specific factors affect whether a CT scan changes treatment and which clinical factors are most important in surgical decision-making., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Methods: A questionnaire composed of 24 ASI vignettes was administered to Herodicus Society members, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Neer Circle members, and sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Participants chose their recommended surgical treatment from the options of arthroscopic Bankart repair, open Bankart repair, bony reconstruction procedure, or other based on patient history, radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were then shown CT images and asked whether their treatment plan changed and, if not, whether the CT scan was not necessary or had reinforced their decision. Generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression modeling was performed to assess the influence of vignette and respondent characteristics on treatment decisions., Results: A total of 74 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey; 96% were fellowship trained (sports medicine, 50%; shoulder and elbow surgery, 41%), and 66% practiced in academic settings. CT imaging did not change the selected treatment strategy in 75.6% of responses. In cases when management did not change, surgeons reported that the CT scan reinforced their decision in 53.4% of responses and was not necessary for decision-making in 22.2% of responses. Decision-making was more likely to be changed after CT in male patients and those with off-track lesions., Conclusion: Information gained from a CT scan did not alter treatment decision-making in three-quarters of vignettes among surgeons experienced in the management of ASI. The finding that CT scans did alter the treatment plan in nearly a quarter of cases is not insignificant, and it appears that in patients with borderline glenoid track status and few other risk factors for recurrence after arthroscopic stabilization, CT imaging is more likely to change management.

Background: Lesions that involve humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGLs), although less common, are primary contributors to recurrent events of dislocation and subluxation of the glenohumeral joint., Purpose: To describe the clinical presentation, examination, and surgical outcomes of patients presenting with HAGL lesions who underwent repair using an arthroscopic or open technique., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of skeletally mature patients without glenohumeral arthritis who presented with HAGL lesions and subsequently underwent arthroscopic or open repair between 2005 and 2017. Independent variables included patient characteristics, clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and arthroscopic findings. Dependent variables included pre- and postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) score, and range of motion outcomes., Results: Eighteen patients diagnosed with a HAGL lesion who underwent primary arthroscopic repair (n = 7) or open repair (n = 11) were included. There were 17 male patients and 1 female patient with a mean age of 24.9 years (range, 16-38 years). Mean follow-up duration was 50.9 months (range, 24-160 months). Seventeen patients (94.4%) reported pain as the most common symptom, and 7 (38.9%) reported sensation of instability. Scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperative for the arthroscopic and open groups ( P < .001): SANE (mean ± SD; arthroscopic, 30.7 ± 15.7 to 92.1 ± 12.2; open, 45.5 ± 8.50 to 90.7 ± 5.24) and WOSI (arthroscopic, 51.4 ± 11.4 to 2.49 ± 3.70; open, 45.5 ± 7.37 to 11.5 ± 5.76). The magnitude of improvement in SANE scores was significantly higher for patients treated arthroscopically (Δ60.0; open, Δ46.5; P = .012). Postoperative WOSI scores were also significantly better in the arthroscopic cohort (2.49 ± 3.70; open, 11.5 ± 5.76; P = .00094)., Conclusion: Symptomatic HAGL tears present primarily with pain as opposed to instability, necessitating a high index of suspicion for injury. The tears may be treated successfully with an arthroscopic or open technique with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and stability.

Coaching, mentorship, and leadership are all paramount for the creation of a championship-winning football team. Looking back and studying the great coaches of professional football provides valuable insight into the qualities and the characteristics they possessed and how that impacted their leadership. Many of the great coaches from this game have instilled team standards and a culture that led to unprecedented success and sprouted into many other great coaches and leaders. Leadership at all levels of an organization is essential to consistently achieve a championship-caliber team., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose about this work. Other disclosures: Dr M.T. Provencher receives royalties from Arthrex, Inc. and Elsevier, Inc., consulting fees from Arthrex, Inc., Joint Restoration Foundation, and SLACK, Inc., and is an honorarium for Arthrosurface. He is currently a Board or Committee member of the following: AAOS: Board or Committee member; AANA: Board or Committee member; AOSSM: Board or Committee member; ASES: Board or Committee member; Arthroscopy: Editorial or governing board; ISAKOS: Board or Committee member; Knee: Editorial or governing board; Orthopedics: Editorial or governing board; San Diego Shoulder Institute: Board or Committee member; SLACK Inc: Editorial or governing board; Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons: Board or Committee member., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The posterior medial meniscal root (PMMR) experiences variable and multiaxial forces during loading. Current methods to measure these forces are limited and fail to adequately characterize the loads in all three dimensions at the root. Our novel technique resolved these limitations with the installation of a 3-axis sensing construct that we hypothesized would not affect contact mechanics, would not impart extraneous loads onto the PMMR, would accurately measure forces, and would not deflect under joint loads. Six cadaveric specimens were dissected to the joint capsule and a sagittal-plane, femoral condyle osteotomy was performed to gain access to the root. The load sensor was placed below the PMMR and was validated across four tests. The contact mechanics test demonstrated a contact area precision of 44 mm 2 and a contact pressure precision of 5.0 MPa between the pre-installation and post-installation states. The tibial displacement test indicated an average bone plug displacement of < 1 mm in all directions. The load validation test exhibited average precision values of 0.7 N in compression, 0.5 N in tension, 0.3 N in anterior-posterior shear, and 0.3 N in medial-lateral shear load. The bone plug deflection test confirmed < 2 mm of displacement in any direction when placed under a load. This is the first study to successfully validate a technique for measuring both magnitude and direction of forces experienced at the PMMR. This validated method has applications for improving surgical repair techniques and developing safer rehabilitation and postoperative protocols that decrease root loads., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was developed as a minimally invasive, innovate technique to restore normal shoulder biomechanics for patients who present with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear (MIRCTs) that preclude shoulder arthroplasty. Current studies have shown that SCR for MIRCTs result in excellent short-term clinical outcomes, adequate pain relief, and functional improvement with low graft failure and complication rates. This article aims to critically evaluate the biomechanics, indications, procedural considerations, clinical outcomes, rehabilitation program, and complications associated with the SCR procedure., Competing Interests: Disclosure P. Ganokroj, A.M. Peebles, and M.L. Vopat have no disclosures to report. Dr M.T. Provencher receives royalties from Arthrex, Inc. and Elsevier, Inc., consulting fees from Arthrex, Inc., Joint Restoration Foundation, and SLACK, Inc., and is an honoraria for Arthrosurface. He is currently a Board or Committee member of the following: AAOS: Board or Committee member; AANA: Board or Committee member; AOSSM: Board or Committee member; ASES: Board or Committee member; Arthroscopy: Editorial or governing board; ISAKOS: Board or Committee member; Knee: Editorial or governing board; Orthopedics: Editorial or governing board; San Diego Shoulder Institute: Board or Committee member; SLACK Inc: Editorial or governing board; Society of Military Orthopedic Surgeons: Board or Committee member., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has become more common as surgical indications have expanded. However, the burden of revision shoulder arthroplasty has inevitably increased as well. Multiple studies have examined the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) as a revision option for failed anatomic TSA with a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. Successful reconstruction of failed TSA with rTSA requires sufficient glenoid bone to place the glenoid segment, enough proximal humeral bone to allow for implantation of the humeral component, and sufficient tension in the soft-tissue envelope to ensure implant stability. In this article, we describe our preferred rTSA revision technique for the treatment of a failed TSA., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Importance: Repair of the subscapularis can be effective in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). However, there has yet to be a consensus on an optimal repair technique., Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review is to consolidate current high-quality studies comparing outcomes after rTSA with different subscapularis repair techniques., Evidence Review: A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses using the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies observing outcomes of rTSA after subscapularis repair published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2020. Subscapularis management techniques were repair to (1) tendon (tendon-tendon), (2) prosthetic stem, (3) lesser tuberosity (bone tunnels) or (4) a subscapularis-preserving approach (intact). The repair technique was recorded for included studies, and clinical and functional subjective scores were extracted from text, tables and figures. Forest plots were created to allow for qualitative comparison of the outcomes of interest between subscapularis repair techniques., Findings: Seven comprehensive studies were identified, which included 367 patients. The mean age of patient at the time of surgery was 71.1 ± 2.8 years (range = 47-87 years). Overall, 259 patients underwent tendon-tendon repair, 48 patients underwent repair to prosthetic stem, 40 patients underwent repair with bone tunnels and 20 patients' subscapularis remained intact. Significant improvement was seen in most studies for Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (range, Δ 42.6-Δ 46.0 out of 3), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (range, Δ44.2-Δ43.6 out of 3) and Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (range Δ 4.2-Δ 6 out of 5). Active forward elevation (range Δ 40.4°-Δ 57.3° out of 4) and active external rotation (range Δ 2.9°-Δ 16.0° out of 4) significantly improved, but forward elevation varied by nearly 17° (Δ16.94°), while external rotation varied by 13° (Δ13.16°) among repair techniques. Complications were reported in only one study, which used a tendon-tendon technique., Conclusions and Relevance: This study summarizes the current evidence regarding subscapularis repair techniques after rTSA including functional and subjective clinical outcome scores. Several different subscapularis repair techniques during rTSA appear to lend to sufficient improvement in clinical and subjective outcomes. This information can help guide future studies in this area and highlights the need for high quality studies comparing different subscapularis repair techniques., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries rarely occur as an isolated event and often include associated meniscal, subchondral bone, and collateral ligament injuries. Concomitant pathology frequently complicates primary and revision ACL reconstruction and must be addressed to ensure comprehensive diagnosis and treatment. In this Technical Note, we describe our method for treatment of complex knee instability following multiple failed ACL reconstruction using a multiligament reconstruction technique with an osteochondral allograft transplantation to the lateral femoral condyle. This comprehensive repair technique restores the anatomic load bearing forces of the cruciate and collateral ligaments and promotes biological repair through incorporation of cartilage resurfacing to ultimately achieve optimal kinematics of the knee joint., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a challenging problem. Recently, the effect of increased posterior tibial slope has been identified as a risk factor for ACLR failure. In cases with increased posterior tibial slope, an anterior closing wedge, slope-correcting high tibial osteotomy can be used as a robust adjunct to revision ACLR. In this Technical Note, we demonstrate our preferred method for isolated sagittal plane correction following multiple failed ACLRs with an anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy technique using 3-dimensional patient-specific instrumentation. Through correction of the angular deformity and restoration of the defined sagittal slope via the use of advanced 3-dimensional patient-specific instrumentation, this technique fosters an accurate, favorable mechanical environment to prevent recurrent instability of the knee joint., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Neurovascular anatomy has not been previously quantified for the arthroscopic snapping scapula approach with the patient in the most frequent patient position ("chicken-wing" position). The purposes of this study were (1) to determine anatomic relationships of the superomedial scapula and neurovascular structures at risk during arthroscopic surgical treatment of snapping scapula syndrome (SSS), (2) to compare these measurements between the arm in the neutral position and the arm in the chicken-wing position, and (3) to establish safe zones for arthroscopic treatment of SSS., Methods: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hemi-torsos (mean age, 55.8 years; range, 52-66 years) were dissected to ascertain relevant anatomic structure locations including the (1) spinal accessory nerve, (2) dorsal scapular nerve, and (3) suprascapular nerve. A coordinate measuring device was used to collect data on the relationships of anatomic landmarks and at-risk structures during the surgical approach., Results: The dorsal scapular nerve was a mean of 24.4 mm medial to the superomedial scapula in the neutral position and 33.1 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001); the dorsal scapular nerve was 21.7 mm medial to the medial border of the scapular spine in the neutral position and 35.5 mm medial in the chicken-wing position (P < .001). The mean distance from the superomedial angle to the spinal accessory nerve intersection at the superior scapular border was 16.5 mm in the neutral position and 15.0 mm in the chicken-wing position (P = .031). The average distance from the superomedial angle to the closest point of the spinal accessory nerve was 11.6 mm and 10.4 mm in the neutral position and chicken-wing position, respectively (P = .039)., Conclusion: Neurologic structures around the scapula vary significantly between the neutral arm position and the chicken-wing position commonly used in the arthroscopic treatment of SSS. The chicken-wing position improves safe distances for the dorsal scapular nerve during medial-portal placement and should be considered as a primary position for arthroscopic management of SSS., (Copyright © 2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glenoid restoration techniques to address glenohumeral instability-induced anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss (AGBL and PGBL) often require reconstruction, but best-fit bone block (BFBB) modeling has not been developed., Purpose: To provide glenoid bony reconstruction models for anterior and posterior instability of the shoulder using a bone loss instability cohort with high-fidelity 3-dimensional (3D) imaging., Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients indicated for operative stabilization who had posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected GBL who underwent 2-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT). Patients were matched by sex, laterality, and age to patients who underwent operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. Mimics software was used to convert all 2D CT scans into 3D models of the scapula. A BFBB model was designed to digitally reconstruct GBL and was used to predict the amount, anatomic configuration, and fixation configuration of bony reconstruction required in AGBL and PGBL., Results: The study included 30 patients with posterior instability and 30 patients with anterior instability; the participants' mean ± SD age was 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range, 16.0-51.0 years). Mean surface area of AGBL was 24.9% ± 7.7% (range, 14.7%-39.1%). Mean BFBB dimensions to reconstruct the anterior glenoid were determined to be a superior-inferior length of 23.9 ± 4.2 mm, anterior-posterior width of 6.4 ± 2.4 mm, and height of 1 cm. Mean angle of AGBL bone block interface relative to glenoid to reconstruct the native concavity was 79.4°± 5.9°. For PGBL, the mean surface area was 9.2% ± 5.6% (range, 3.0%-26.3%). Mean BFBB dimensions to reconstruct the posterior glenoid were a superior-inferior length of 21.9 ± 3.4 mm, width of 4.5 ± 2.3 mm, and height of 1 cm. The mean angle of PGBL bone block interface relative to the glenoid to reconstruct the native concavity was 38.6°± 14.3°. Orientation relative to the vertical glenoid axis was 77.2°± 13.8° in anterior reconstructions versus 105.9°± 10.9° in posterior reconstructions., Conclusion: Patients with anterior instability required a more rectangular BFBB with a bone block-glenoid interface angle of 79°, whereas patients with posterior instability required a more trapezoidal, obtusely oriented BFBB with a bone block-glenoid interface angle of 39°. BFBBs for either AGBL or PGBL can be effectively designed, and their size and/or shape can be predicted based on approximate percentage of GBL.

Reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (rHSLs) after chronic posterior shoulder instability are important to recognize and treat appropriately. Treatment options for posterior instability with rHSL in the current literature are primarily based on percentage of humeral bone loss. In cases of moderate (25% to 50%) anterolateral humeral head bone loss, fresh osteochondral allografts are preferred. Recent literature has indicated that the talus serves as a robust grafting alternative site for the humeral head, as the talar dome shows high congruency and offers variable sizes. The purpose of this Technical Note is, therefore, to describe our technique for talus allograft preparation for the treatment of a large rHSL that highlights precise cutting anatomy, sizing options, and use of orthobiologics to ensure excellent talus union to the native humeral head surface., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Surgical pectoralis major (PM) repair can offer improved functional outcomes over nonoperative treatment. However, there is a lack of literature on consensus of the anatomical site of the humeral attachment., Purpose: To provide qualitative and quantitative anatomic analysis of the PM by focusing on humeral insertion and relevant structures at risk., Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study., Methods: Eight fresh-frozen male cadavers were dissected. The relevant landmarks that were collected and measured included (1) PM footprint length at the humeral insertion (total, sternal head, and clavicular head insertions); (2) PM tendon length from the humeral insertion to the musculotendinous junction; (3) distance from the PM humeral insertion to the lateral (LPN) and medial (MPN) pectoral nerves; and (4) distance from the coracoid process to the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) in anatomical position., Results: The total PM footprint length was 81.4 mm (95% CI, 71.4-91.3). The sternal and clavicular heads that make up the PM had footprint lengths of 42.1 mm (95% CI, 32.9-51.4) and 56.6 mm (95% CI, 46.5-66.7), respectively. The PM tendon was wider at the clavicular head (74.7 mm; 95% CI, 67.5-81.7) than the sternal head insertions (43.0 mm; 95% CI, 40.1-45.9). The distances from the PM humeral insertion to LPN and MPN were 93.2 mm (95% CI, 83.1-103.3) and 103.8 mm (95% CI, 98.3-109.4), respectively. The coracoid process to MCN distance was 68.5 mm (95% CI, 60.2-76.8)., Conclusion: This study successfully quantifies anatomic dimensions of the PM tendon, its sternal and clavicular head insertions, and its location relative to nearby vital structures. Such knowledge can provide surgeons with a better understanding of the PM in relation to nearby neurovascular structures during anatomic PM repair and reconstruction to avoid debilitating complications., Clinical Relevance: Knowledge of the quantitative anatomy of the PM at the humeral footprint along structures at risk may aid surgeons with identifying the injured part of the PM and improve outcomes for anatomic repair and reconstruction., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Specimens were donated for medical research and subsequently purchased by the Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI) from corresponding tissue banks. P.J.M. has received research support from Arthrex, Ossur, Siemens, and Smith & Nephew; consulting fees from Arthrex; royalties from Arthrex, Medbridge, and Springer; hospitality payments from Arthrosurface, Merz Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Aventis, and Stryker; and stock/stock options from VuMedi. M.T.P. has received consulting fees from Arthrex, JRF Ortho, and SLACK; royalties from Arthrex and Elsevier; and honoraria from Arthrosurface. The SPRI, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit institution supported financially by private donations and corporate support, exercises special care to identify any financial interests or relationships related to research conducted. During the past calendar year, SPRI has received grant funding or in-kind donations from Arthrex, Ossur, Siemens, Smith & Nephew, and DJO. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Purpose: To assess clinical outcomes following pectoralis major tendon (PMT) repairs and to compare outcomes of PMT repairs augmented with and without leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma (LP-PRP)., Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed of patients who underwent a PMT repair from May 2007 to June 2019 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included revision PMT repair, PMT reconstruction, and concomitant repair of another glenohumeral tendon/ligament. LP-PRP was injected surrounding the PMT repair before wound closure. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data were collected preoperatively and evaluated at final follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH), and Short Form 12 physical component summary (SF-12 PCS), patient satisfaction with outcomes., Results: Twenty-three men (mean age, 38.6 years; range, 20.5-64.3 years) were included in the final analysis. Mean time from injury to surgery was 30 days (range, 3-123 days). Follow-up was obtained for 16 of 23 patients (70%) at a mean of 5.1 years (range 2.0-13.0 years). Significant improvement in PROs was observed (ASES: 59.0 → 92.4, P  = .008; SANE: 44.4 → 85.9, P  = .018; QuickDASH: 44.4 → 8.5, P  = .018; and SF-12 PCS: 42.5 → 52.6, P  = .008). Median satisfaction was 9 of 10 (range, 6-10). Patients receiving LP-PRP had superior ASES (99.6 vs 83.0, P  = .001), SANE (94.8 vs 74.6, P  = .005), QuickDASH (0.24 vs 19.1, P  = .001), and patient satisfaction (10 vs 9, P  = .037) scores compared with those without PRP. PROs were unchanged based on chronicity, mechanism of injury, or tear location. One patient had revision surgery at 3.4 years due to adhesions., Conclusions: PMT repair produces improved PROs at final follow-up when compared with preoperative values., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Chronic instability or degenerative arthritis of the sternoclavicular (SC) joint may occur after traumatic or spontaneous dislocation of the SC joint. Most commonly, chronic instability of the SC joint occurs anteriorly; however, posterior instability has an increased risk of serious complications because of proximity to mediastinal structures. Although chronic anterior instability of the SC joint does not resolve with nonsurgical treatment, patients often have mild symptoms that do not impair activities of daily living; however, chronic anterior SC joint instability may be functionally limiting in more active individuals. In these cases, surgical treatment with either (1) SC joint reconstruction or (2) medial clavicle resection, or both, can be done. Recurrent posterior instability of the SC joint also requires surgical treatment due to risk of injury to mediastinal structures. Recent literature describes various reconstruction techniques which generally show improved patient-reported outcomes and low complication rates., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

➤: Orthobiologics encompass numerous substances that are naturally found in the human body including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), isolated growth factors, and cell therapy approaches to theoretically optimize and improve the healing of cartilage, fractures, and injured muscles, tendons, and ligaments., ➤: PRP is an autologous derivative of whole blood generated by centrifugation and is perhaps the most widely used orthobiologic treatment modality. Despite a vast amount of literature on its use in osteoarthritis as well as in tendon and ligament pathology, clinical efficacy results remain mixed, partly as a result of insufficient reporting of experimental details or exact compositions of PRP formulations used., ➤: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can be isolated from a variety of tissues, with the most common being bone marrow aspirate concentrate. Similar to PRP, clinical results in orthopaedics with MSCs have been highly variable, with the quality and concentration of MSCs being highly contingent on the site of procurement and the techniques of harvesting and preparation., ➤: Advances in novel orthobiologics, therapeutic targets, and customized orthobiologic therapy will undoubtedly continue to burgeon, with some early promising results from studies targeting fibrosis and senescence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G983 )., (Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report return to sport, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), subjective outcomes, and complications or failures in patients who underwent open Latarjet surgery., Methods: Patients who underwent open Latarjet surgery performed by 2 fellowship-trained surgeons between August 2006 and November 2018 were included. Prospectively collected data were reviewed. Recurrent instability and revision surgical procedures were recorded. Subjective outcomes included return to sport and fear of reinjury or activity modification as a result of patients' instability history. PROs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Short Form 12 Physical Component Summary score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and satisfaction. Age, sex, sports participation, pain, primary vs. revision surgery (prior failed arthroscopic or open Bankart repair), dislocation number, glenoid bone loss, glenoid track concept, and projected glenoid track were evaluated. Failure was defined as an ASES score <70, recurrent dislocation, or revision instability surgery., Results: A total of 126 shoulders (125 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 28.1 years (range, 15-57 years). Of 126 shoulders, 7 (5.5%) underwent additional procedures prior to final follow-up and were excluded from outcome analyses; failure occurred in 6 of these shoulders. Mean follow-up data at 3.7 years (range, 2-9.3 years) were attained in 86.6% of patients (103 of 119). All PROs significantly improved from preoperative baseline (ASES score, from 69.7 to 90.2; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, from 55.8 to 85.9; and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, from 28.4 to 10.5). PROs did not differ based on sex, sports participation type, dislocation with or without sports, primary vs. revision procedure, and preoperative dislocation number. No correlations existed between PROs and age, glenoid bone loss, or number of previous surgical procedures. On-track lesions (50 of 105, 47.6%) and projected on-track lesions (90 of 105, 85.7%) correlated with better patient satisfaction but not PROs. Despite not having recurrences, 63 of 99 patients (63.6%) reported activity modifications and 44 of 99 patients (44.4%) feared reinjury. These groups had statistically worse PROs, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Return to sport was reported by 97% of patients (86 of 89), with 74% (66 of 89) returning at the same level or slightly below the preinjury level. Revision stabilization surgery was required 6 of 126 cases (4.8%), and 6 of 103 shoulders (5.8%) had ASES scores <70., Conclusion: The open Latarjet procedure led to significant improvements in all PROs, and overall, 97% of patients returned to sport. Fear of reinjury and activity modifications were common after open Latarjet procedures but did not appear to affect clinical outcomes. On-track and projected on-track measurements correlated with better patient satisfaction but not improved PROs., (Copyright © 2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are a common injury affecting 2 of every 10,000 people in the general population and comprise 9% to 12% of all injuries to the shoulder. Most injuries occur through contact activity, which drives the acromion inferiorly with the clavicle remaining in its anatomic position, initiating a cascade of injury propagating from the AC ligament followed by failure of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Many techniques have been described for AC joint injuries, without a consensus gold standard. The revision setting offers even less consensus on treatment options and countless difficulties for surgeons. There have been more than 60 described procedures regarding AC and coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions, with significant controversy regarding the optimal intervention for each injury. When these techniques fail, it is important to pinpoint the mechanism of failure to construct a successful plan for revision. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred method of primary AC and revision coracoclavicular reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft semitendinosus as well as TightRope fixation.

Background: While the glenoid track concept presents a useful prediction for recurrent glenohumeral instability, little is known about the humeral head bony architecture as it relates to glenoid erosion in the setting of bipolar bone loss., Purpose: To (1) qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the interplay between glenoid bone loss (GBL) and Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) in a cohort of patients with anterior instability using 3-dimensional imaging software and (2) assess the relationships between GBL and HSL characteristics., Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: Patients were identified who had anterior shoulder instability with a minimum 5% GBL and evidence of HSL confirmed on computed tomography. Unilateral 3-dimensional models of the ipsilateral proximal humeral head and en face sagittal oblique view of the glenoid were reconstructed using MIMICS software (Materialise NV). GBL surface area, width, defect length, and glenoid track width were quantified. The volume, surface area, width, and depth of identified HSLs were quantified with their location (medial, superior, and inferior extent) on the humeral head. Severity of GBL was defined as percentage glenoid bone surface area loss and categorized as low grade (5%-10%), moderate grade (>10% to 20%), high grade (>20% to 30%), and extensive (>30%). Analysis of variance was then computed to determine significance ( P < .05) between severity of GBL and associated HSL parameters., Results: In total, 100 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age, 27.9 years; range, 18-43 years), which included 58 right shoulders and 42 left shoulders (84 male, 16 female). Among groups, there were 32 patients with low-grade GBL (mean GBL = 6.1%), 38 with moderate grade (mean GBL = 16.2%), 17 with high grade (mean GBL = 23.7%), and 13 with extensive (mean GBL = 34.0%), with an overall mean GBL of 18.1% (range, 5%-39%). Patients with 5%-10% GBL had significantly narrower HSLs (average and maximum width; P < .03) and deeper HSLs (average depth; P = .002) as compared with all other GBL groups, while greater GBL was associated with wider and shallower HSLs. GBL width, percentage width loss, defect length, and glenoid track width all significantly differed across the 4 GBL groups ( P < .05)., Conclusion: HSLs had significantly different morphological characteristics depending on the severity of GBL, indicating that GBL was directly related to the characteristics of HSLs. Patients presenting with smaller glenoid defects had significantly narrower and deeper HSLs with less humeral head surface area loss, while greater GBL was associated with wider and shallower HSLs.

Hypothesis/background: There is no consensus on whether to repair the subscapularis in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). There have been an assortment of studies showing mixed results regarding shoulder stability and postoperative strength outcomes when looking at subscapularis repair in rTSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate differences in biomechanical strength outcomes of cadaveric subscapularis repair vs. no repair in rTSA.Increased force will be required to move the shoulder through normal range of motion (ROM) in cadaveric rTSA shoulders with the subscapularis repaired when compared with no subscapularis repair., Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. The databases used to search the keywords used for the concepts of subscapularis, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and muscle strength were PubMed (includes MEDLINE), Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews and Trials, and Scopus. Original, English-language cadaveric studies evaluating rTSA and subscapularis management were included, with subscapularis repair surgical techniques and strength outcomes being evaluated for each article meeting inclusion criteria., Results: The search yielded 4113 articles that were screened for inclusion criteria by 4 authors. Two articles met inclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the final full-text review. A total of 11 shoulders were represented between these 2 studies. Heterogeneity of the data across the 2 studies did not allow for meta-analysis. Hansen et al found that repair of the subscapularis with rTSA significantly increased the mean joint reaction force and the force required by the posterior deltoid, total deltoid, infraspinatus, teres minor, total posterior rotator cuff, and pectoralis major muscles. Giles et al found that rotator cuff repair and glenosphere lateralization both increased total joint load., Conclusion: The present review of biomechanical literature shows that repair of the subscapularis in the setting of rTSA can effectively restore shoulder strength by increasing joint reactive forces and ROM force requirements of other rotator cuff muscles and of the deltoid muscle. Available biomechanical evidence is limited, and further biomechanical studies evaluating the strength of various subscapularis repair techniques are needed to evaluate the effects of these techniques on joint reactive forces and muscle forces required for ROM., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Massive tears of the rotator cuff can result in severe functional deficits due to loss of the axial force couple and effective fulcrum that the intact cuff normally provides. For massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears, especially in the setting of early to moderate degenerative changes, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty functions to modify the center of joint rotation, allowing the deltoid and intact components of the cuff to carry out shoulder function more effectively. Our preferred technique uses a standard open deltopectoral shoulder approach with a 3-dimensional glenoid baseplate model and a 135° prosthesis in an onlay configuration to reduce the risk of scapular notching and increase lateralization of the humerus.

Purpose: To characterize the qualitative anatomy of posterior scapula structures encountered with the Judet approach and to perform a quantitative evaluation of these structures' anatomic locations, including their relationships to osseus landmarks to identify safe zones., Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 55.2 years; range 41-64 years; 5 left, 7 right) were dissected. A coordinate measuring machine was used to collect the coordinates of anatomic landmarks, structures at risk during surgical approach to the posterior scapula, and the footprints of muscle attachments on the posterior scapula. These coordinates were analyzed for their relationships with clinically relevant anatomy., Results: The suprascapular nerve was a mean of 20.3 mm (18.9-21.7 mm) medial to the glenoid 9-o'clock position. The posterior circumflex artery and vein were a mean of 100.0 mm (92.2-107.7 mm) lateral to along the lateral border of the scapula from the inferior angle of the scapula and a mean of 41 mm (34.2-47.9 mm) medial along the lateral scapular border from the 6-o'clock position on the glenoid rim. The long head of the triceps covers a mean of 132 mm 2 , and it was found to be contiguous with the glenoid capsule at the 6-o'clock position., Conclusions: A safe zone exists 19 mm medially from the glenoid 9-o'clock position to the suprascapular nerve and a minimum of 34.2 mm medially along the lateral scapular border from the glenoid 6 o'clock to the posterior circumflex scapular artery., Clinical Relevance: The modified Judet approach is a minimally invasive surgery that reduces surgical trauma but necessitates precise knowledge of scapular neurovascular anatomy. Surgeons should be aware of these intervals to help avoid these structures when working near the posterior shoulder. This study may allow us to define neurovascular safe zones when this approach is used.

Purpose: To investigate whether psychological factors, such as avoidance behavior, fear, pain catastrophization, kinesiophobia, anxiety, depression, optimism, and expectation are associated with different subjective and functional baseline scores in patients with frozen shoulder contracture syndrome (FSCS)., Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL Database), PEDro, Pubpsych, and PsychNET.APA without restrictions applied to language, date, or status of publication. Two authors reviewed study titles, abstract, and full text based on the following inclusion criteria: adult population (≥ 30 < 70 years old) with FSCS., Results: Seven hundred and seventy-six records were included by the search strategies. After title final screening, 6 studies were included for the qualitative synthesis. Psychological features investigated were anxiety, depression, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy; reported outcomes included pain, function, disability, quality of life, and range of motion. Data suggest that anxiety and depression impact self-assessed function, pain, and quality of life. There is no consensus on the correlation between psychological variables and range of motion. Associations were suggested between pain-related fear, pain-related beliefs, and pain-related behavior and perceived arm function; pain-related conditions showed no significant correlation with range of motion and with perceived stiffness at baseline., Conclusion: Scores traditionally thought to assess physical dimensions like shoulder pain, disability, and function seem to be influenced by psychological variables. In FSCS patients, depression and anxiety were associated with increased pain perception and decreased function and quality of life at baseline. Moreover, pain-related fear and catastrophizing seem to be associated with perceived arm function., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder instability has gained significant interest in recent years and involves evaluation of both glenoid and humeral sided bone loss. Decision making is more complex in patients with significant humeral or glenoid bone defects or in those who underwent previous instability surgery. Appropriate assessment of the glenoid track is necessary as "off track" lesions typically require treatments beyond arthroscopic labral repair alone. In those with significant humeral or glenoid sided bone loss, the authors recommend three-dimensional computed tomography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging for accurate evaluation. The Glenoid Track Instability Management Score is a useful guide to help direct treatment by using the glenoid track as well as other known risk factors for recurrence. In circumstances with significant glenoid bone loss, typically over 20%, a coracoid transfer such as the Latarjet is recommended. In patients that previously failed a coracoid transfer, the authors recommend a distal tibia allograft; however, distal clavicle and iliac crest autograft have also been reported to have high success rates. In those with large Hill-Sachs lesions, remplissage or bone grafting are recommended. An estimation of the postoperative glenoid track after glenoid bone augmentation is required for appropriate Hill-Sachs lesion treatment. The authors typically recommend against revision instability surgical treatment with arthroscopic repair alone., (Copyright © 2022 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bony Bankart lesions can perpetuate chronic anterior glenohumeral instability. When surgical treatment is pursued, several factors need to be considered to obtain optimal outcomes., Purpose: To (1) quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption and associated risk factors for developing glenoid bone loss (GBL) and (2) to compare clinical and radiological results of attritional bone loss treated with either the arthroscopic Bankart or the open Latarjet procedure., Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3., Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization (group A1, 10%-20% GBL; group A2, >20% GBL) or open Latarjet (group B, >10% GBL) for recurrent shoulder instability with bony Bankart lesion. Patient characteristics, number of dislocations, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores were obtained. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography imaging was used to quantitatively describe patterns of bone fragment resorption., Results: A total of 120 consecutive patients (group A1, 40; group A2, 23; group B, 57) were included in the study, with a mean age of 25.6 years (range, 19-35 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years for all groups (range, 4.83-5.16 years in group A1, 4.58-5.41 years in group A2, and 4.33-5.67 years in group B). The mean times between dislocation event and surgery were 12.8 months (range, 6-32 months) and 13.6 months (range, 6-38 months) for groups A and B, respectively. Redislocation rates were 7.5% in group A1 versus 13.0% in group A2, and only occurred in patients with ≥13.5% GBL. There were no redislocations for group B (0%). Patients had better WOSI scores in group B (234.1 ± 126.9) than in group A (576.1 ± 224.6) ( P < .0001). In group A, smaller preoperative bone fragment size displayed a higher percentage of resorption after surgery ( r = -0.64; P < .05)., Conclusion: A significant inverse relationship exists between preoperative bone fragment size and percentage of postoperative resorption. Patients treated with arthroscopic bony Bankart repair who had final GBL ≥13.5% had worse outcomes. When planned GBL approaches 13.5% in high-demand patients, a smaller fragment size can result in worse clinical outcomes because of resorption. In these cases, choosing the open Latarjet procedure leads to better clinical results.

Background: The effect of coronal plane alignment on the outcomes of repairs of the medial meniscus root remains unclear., Hypothesis: Increased preoperative varus alignment is associated with higher failure rates and lower patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after isolated repair of the medial meniscus root., Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent arthroscopy-assisted repair of the medial posterior meniscus root over a 7-year period were included. The mechanical axis of the knee was measured preoperatively. Osteoarthritis was assessed radiographically preoperatively and at the final follow-up according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading scale. Failure was defined as any patient having to undergo revision root repair, partial meniscectomy of the previously repaired meniscus, debridement, lysis of adhesions, or conversion to arthroplasty., Results: A total of 53 patients (29 women, 24 men) with a mean age of 51.3 years were included in the follow-up analysis. The mean time of follow-up after surgery was 3.3 years (range, 22-77 months). Significant improvements were observed in all PROs analyzed. Decreased varus as measured by alignment percentage was correlated with baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain ( P = .023) and WOMAC Stiffness ( P = .022). Alignment percentage was also significantly negatively correlated with postoperative WOMAC Stiffness ( P = .005) and positively correlated with Lysholm ( P = .003) and International Knee Documentation Committee ( P = .009) scores. Higher baseline Kellgren-Lawrence grade was correlated with worse postoperative PROs ( P < .05), except 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Mental Component Summary and satisfaction. Eight patients who underwent a concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) achieved lower PROs in all scales analyzed, regardless of their alignment. When excluding patients who underwent HTO, postoperative Lysholm score ( P = .004) and postoperative WOMAC Stiffness (p = 0.014) were inferior among the patients with >5° of varus., Conclusion: Lower extremity alignment closest to neutral correlated with improved PROs. Patients who underwent a concurrent HTO had worse PROs than those who did not undergo HTO.

Introduction: Musculoskeletal injuries are an endemic amongst U.S. Military Service Members and significantly strain the Department of Defense's Military Health System. The Military Health System aims to provide Service Members, military retirees, and their families the right care at the right time. The Military Orthopedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network (MOTION) captures the data that can optimize musculoskeletal care within the Military Health System. This report provides MOTION structural framework and highlights how it can be used to optimize musculoskeletal care., Materials and Methods: MOTION established an internet-based data capture system, the MOTION Musculoskeletal Data Portal. All adult Military Health System patients who undergo orthopedic surgery are eligible for entry into the database. All data are collected as routine standard of care, with patients and orthopedic surgeons inputting validated global and condition-specific patient reported outcomes and operative case data, respectively. Patients have the option to consent to allow their standard of care data to be utilized within an institutional review board approved observational research study. MOTION data can be merged with other existing data systems (e.g., electronic medical record) to develop a comprehensive dataset of relevant information. In pursuit of enhancing musculoskeletal injury patient outcomes MOTION aims to: (1) identify factors which predict favorable outcomes; (2) develop models which inform the surgeon and military commanders if patients are behind, on, or ahead of schedule for their targeted return-to-duty/activity; and (3) develop predictive models to better inform patients and surgeons of the likelihood of a positive outcome for various treatment options to enhance patient counseling and expectation management., Results: This is a protocol article describing the intent and methodology for MOTION; thus, to date, there are no results to report., Conclusions: MOTION was established to capture the data that are necessary to improve military medical readiness and optimize medical resource utilization through the systematic evaluation of short- and long-term musculoskeletal injury patient outcomes. The systematic enhancement of musculoskeletal injury care through data analyses aligns with the National Defense Authorization Act (2017) and Defense Health Agency's Quadruple Aim, which emphasizes optimizing healthcare delivery and Service Member medical readiness. This transformative approach to musculoskeletal care can be applied across disciplines within the Military Health System., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2020. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.)

In patients with full-thickness focal cartilage defects, osteochondral allograft is a technique for restoration of hyaline cartilage; however, in patients with genu varum, the diseased compartment of the knee is generally offloaded as well. A high tibial osteotomy presents a biomechanical solution to malalignment of the knee and offloading of the diseased compartment of the knee. The purpose of this Technical Note is to present our preferred technique to treat focal cartilage damage in a varus misaligned knee coupling a high tibial osteotomy with an osteochondral allograft to the medial femoral condyle, along with partial medial and lateral meniscectomy.

Fabella syndrome is a relatively rare but potentially debilitating condition that causes posterolateral knee pain and swelling, as well as issues with flexion and/or extension of the knee. Irritation, pain, and cartilage damage ensue as the capsule and fabella make contact with the posterior lateral femoral condyle. This condition should be considered in cases of posterolateral knee pain in which other more common pathologies are not readily identified and when patients present with a positive finding of tenderness on examination at the fabella. Initial treatment consists of activity modification and rest, physical therapy, and potentially cortisone injections. When these fail, surgical excision of the fabella should be considered. Surgery in the posterolateral knee, however, requires careful consideration of the immediate and surrounding anatomic structures and arthroscopy, which can be technically challenging. The objective of this technical note is to describe our open technique for symptomatic fabella excision that is easily reproducible, with pearls to minimize risk to the posterolateral structures of the knee.

Shoulder injuries are common in contact athletes and vary in severity because of the required complex interplay of shoulder stability and range of motion for proper function. Pathology varies based on sport but most commonly includes shoulder instability, acromioclavicular injuries, traumatic rotator cuff tears, and brachial plexus injuries. Acute management ranges from reduction of shoulder dislocations to physical examination to determine the severity of injury. Appropriate radiographs should be obtained to evaluate for alignment and fracture, with magnetic resonance imaging commonly being necessary for accurate diagnosis and management. Treatments range from surgical stabilization in shoulder instability to repeat examinations and physical therapy. Return-to-play decision making can be complex with avoidance of reinjury and player safety being of utmost concern. Appropriate evaluation and treatment are vital because repeat injury can lead to long-term effects due to the relatively high effectsometimes seen in contact sports., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Despite the recent decrease in high tempo combat operations, threats to the medical readiness of Service Members remain a persistent issue. In fact, recent research efforts have demonstrated that musculoskeletal disease nonbattle injury represents perhaps the most immediate threat to the medical readiness of Service Members over the past several years. Innovations in a number of therapeutic options, particularly orthobiologics, have shown substantial promise in accelerating recovery and returning tactical athletes to full, unrestricted duties. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis remains a vexing topic but at the same time an intersectional opportunity for a multidisciplinary approach to better understand its pathogenesis, limit its prevalence, and mitigate the functional consequences of its sequalae. The expansion of a clinical infrastructure capable of the prospective collection of Service Members' functional outcomes across military treatment facilities promises to sharpen clinicians' understanding of both the impact of novel treatments for common injuries and the success of efforts to prevent recurrence (Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injury Network, Bethesda, MD). However, policy makers and stakeholders will increasingly find themselves in an environment of increasingly limited resources, which will necessitate creative strategies to maintain the lethality of a fit, fighting force., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss morphology have both been individually and morphologically described in previous studies. While there exists substantial literature on anterior bone loss, and emerging evidence describing posterior bone loss, a direct comparison between the two is lacking in the current literature. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the anatomic and morphological differences in glenoid bone loss (GBL) in operative patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability., Methods: All patients over a 3-year period indicated for operative stabilization with posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected glenoid bone loss who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan were reviewed. Included patients were then singularly matched by gender, laterality, and age (±3 years) to a collection of patients who presented for operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. GBL parameters were assessed based on the following characterizing measurements: (1) percentage of GBL, (2) glenoid vault version, (3) slope of the glenoid defect relative to the glenoid surface, (4) superior-inferior defect height, and (5) anterior-posterior defect width., Results: Sixty patients (30 anterior GBL, 30 posterior GBL) were included in the final analysis (60 males), with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range 16.0 to 51.0 years). Patients with anterior instability presented with higher GBL (24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58, P  < .001), greater superior-inferior defect height (23.89 ± 4.21 mm vs. 21.88 ± 3.42 mm, P  = .047), and steeper slope of glenoid defect (58.80° ± 11.86 vs. 38.59° ± 14.30, P  < .001), while patients with posterior instability had greater retroversion (1.53° ± 4.04 vs. 7.59° ± 7.71, P  < .001). Additionally, the anterior instability cohort had significantly more patients with moderate- to high-grade glenoid bone loss (n = 30) than patients with posterior instability (n = 11) ( P  < .001)., Conclusion: Anterior instability presents with a steeper slope of glenoid defect, higher percentage GBL, and greater superior-inferior defect height, whereas posterior instability presents with greater retroversion. This underscores the finding that anterior and posterior instability bone loss are not the same morphologically, and this should be considered in the operative treatment of glenohumeral instability.

Background: Variability exists between total shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software (PPS) systems for glenoid angular measurements. The purpose of this study is to locate the region on the glenoid at which inclination and version are measured on the PPS modalities of Blueprint and VIP., Methods: Preoperative computed tomography scans of 30 consecutive patients undergoing primary arthroplasty were analyzed using two PPS systems (VIP and Blueprint) to independently obtain glenoid version and inclination measurements through their respective protocols. Three-dimensional equivalent images were independently analyzed utilizing open-source OsiriX DICOM software by two board-certified orthopedic sports medicine surgeons measuring glenoid version and inclination along ten equal intervals of the glenoid from superior to inferior and anterior to posterior. Manual version and inclination measurements were compared to both the VIP and the Blueprint measurements, and variances were analyzed by calculating root mean square error (RMSE). The closest interval (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) to the VIP and Blueprint measurement was identified for both version and inclination to determine the region of the glenoid both software programs obtained their measurements., Results: Mean glenoid retroversion manually measured using OsiriX was 13.5° compared with 15.1° recorded by Blueprint ( P  = .516) and 12.2° by VIP ( P  = .621). Mean inclination using OsiriX was 5.5°, compared with 7.1° ( P  = .314) and 9.0° ( P  = .024) recorded by Blueprint and VIP, respectively. RMSE for version between Osirix and VIP was 4.65°, for Osirix and Blueprint was 4.44°, and for VIP and Blueprint was 4.45°. RMSE for inclination between Osirix and VIP was 6.43°, for Osirix and Blueprint was 5.25°, and for VIP and Blueprint was 5.13°. For version, VIP measurements most frequently aligned with the inferior quadrant of the glenoid (n = 13) with a median interval of 7, while Blueprint aligned with the superior quadrant of the glenoid (n = 13) with a median interval of 4. Inclination measurements aligned with the posterior quadrant of the glenoid for both VIP (n = 19) and Blueprint (n = 15) with a median interval of 8., Conclusion: PPS systems for shoulder arthroplasty vary in the region of the glenoid for which version and inclination are measured, which may affect the absolute values generated. Location of version measurement was different among the two commercial software programs, with VIP corresponding closest to the most inferior region of the glenoid, while Blueprint to the most superior one. Further research should assist in determining the version and inclination variations among commercial planning software.

Traditionally, total shoulder arthroplasty is performed using a deltopectoral approach through which the glenohumeral joint is accessed by mobilization of the subscapularis. Despite several variations on the subscapularis management techniques, postoperative complications, including subscapularis deficiency and lower functional outcomes, remain an area for improvement. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe in detail our technique for management of the subscapularis in the setting of a stemless humeral implant through which the repair is planned and almost entirely performed at the beginning of the case, prior to the subscapularis peel. This technique aims to improve outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty by 1) avoiding the anatomic implant with anchor drilling, 2) improving procedure efficiency, and 3) anatomically "repairing" the subscapularis prior to takedown by placing anchors exactly at the repair-tension site.

Objectives: To use a novel, validated bioassay to monitor serum concentrations of a breakdown product of collagen X in a prospective longitudinal study of patients sustaining isolated tibial plateau fractures. Collagen X is the hallmark extracellular matrix protein present during conversion of soft, cartilaginous callus to bone during endochondral repair. Previous preclinical and clinical studies demonstrated a distinct peak in collagen X biomarker (CXM) bioassay levels after long bone fractures., Setting: Level 1 academic trauma facility., Patients/participants: Thirty-six patients; isolated tibial plateau fractures., Intervention: (3) Closed treatment, ex-fix (temporizing/definitive), and open reduction internal fixation., Main Outcome Measurements: Collagen X serum biomarker levels (CXM bioassay)., Results: Twenty-two men and 14 women (average age: 46.3 y; 22.6-73.4, SD 13.3) enrolled (16 unicondylar and 20 bicondylar fractures). Twenty-five patients (72.2%) were treated operatively, including 12 (33.3%) provisionally or definitively treated by ex-fix. No difference was found in peak CXM values between sexes or age. Patients demonstrated peak expression near 1000 pg/mL (average: male-986.5 pg/mL, SD 369; female-953.2 pg/mL, SD 576). There was no difference in peak CXM by treatment protocol, external fixator use, or fracture severity (Schatzker). Patients treated with external fixation (P = 0.05) or staged open reduction internal fixation (P = 0.046) critically demonstrated delayed peaks., Conclusions: Pilot analysis demonstrates a strong CXM peak after fractures commensurate with previous preclinical and clinical studies, which was delayed with staged fixation. This may represent the consequence of delayed construct loading. Further validation requires larger cohorts and long-term follow-up. Collagen X may provide an opportunity to support prospective interventional studies testing novel orthobiologics or fixation techniques., Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective clinical observational study., Competing Interests: C. S Bahney discloses an unpaid position on the Board of Directors for Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society (TERMIS), and the International Section of Fracture Repair (ISFR). Furthermore, C. S. Bahney is a paid employee of the nonprofit Steadman Philippon Research Institute (SPRI). SPRI exercises special care to identify any financial interests or relationships related to research conducted here. During the past calendar year, SPRI has received grant funding or in-kind donations from Arthrex, DJO, MLB, Ossur, Siemens, Smith & Nephew, XTRE, and philanthropy. These funding sources provided no support for the work presented in this manuscript. T. Miclau discloses board or committee positions for the AO Foundation, Inman Abbott Society, International Combined Orthopaedic Research Societies, International Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Orthopaedic Research Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care Foundation, and San Francisco General Hospital Foundation. He has received research support from Baxter and is a paid consultant for Arquos, Bone Therapeutics, NXTSENS, Surrozen, and Synthes with stock or stock options at Arquos. None of the paid positions are related to the work presented in this manuscript. R. Coughlan reports patent rights to the CXM biomarker assay technology and a portion of royalties generated through its licensure. He is a paid consultant to Therachon AG and BioMarin Pharmaceutical. None of the paid positions are related to the work presented in this manuscript. The other authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To systematically review and compare the surgical indications, technique, perioperative treatment, outcomes measures, and how recurrence of instability was reported and defined after coracoid transfer procedures., Methods: A systematic review of the literature examining open coracoid transfer outcomes was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the Cochrane registry, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases from 2010 to 2020. Inclusion criteria included open coracoid transfer techniques, including the Bristow or Latarjet technique, full text availability, human studies, and English language., Results: A screen of 1,096 coracoid transfer studies yielded 72 studies, which met inclusion criteria with a total of 4,312 shoulders. One study was a randomized controlled trial, but the majority of them were retrospective. Of those, 65 studies reported on postoperative outcome scores, complication rates, revision rate, and recurrence rates. Forty-three reported on range of motion results. Thirty studies reported on primary coracoid transfer only, 7 on revision only, and 30 on both primary and revision, with 5 not reporting. Average follow-up was 26.9 months (range: 1-316.8 months). Indications for coracoid transfer, technique, perioperative care, complications, and how failure was reported varied greatly among studies., Conclusions: Latarjet and coracoid transfer surgery varies greatly in its indications, technique, and postoperative care. Further, there is great variation in reporting of complications, as well as recurrence and failure and how it is defined. Although coracoid transfer is a successful treatment with a long history, greater consistency regarding these factors is essential for appropriate patient education and surgeon knowledge., Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Various methods exist for managing the joint capsule during the Latarjet procedure. Repairing the capsule to the native glenoid rim results in an extra-articular bone block, while repairing it to the remnant coracoacromial ligament stump of the coracoid graft renders it intra-articular. The technique that optimizes patient outcomes is not well defined., Purpose: To compare the outcomes of intra-articular and extra-articular bone block techniques for the Latarjet procedure., Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4., Methods: Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we queried the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for all studies reporting outcomes of the Latarjet procedure with a clearly defined method of capsular repair that rendered the coracoid graft intra-articular or extra-articular. The included levels of evidence and degree of heterogeneity in this study precluded meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest included preoperative variables, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocols, functional outcome assessments, recurrent instability, range of motion, and radiographic findings., Results: A total of 16 studies including 816 patients were included. A total of 8 studies employed an intra-articular bone block in 338 patients, while the other 8 employed an extra-articular technique in 478 patients. There was variation among studies in reference to baseline patient characteristics, surgical techniques, rehabilitation, methods for assessing patient outcomes, and follow-up times. Rates of postoperative instability were reported in 8 intra-articular (0%, 0%, 2.1%, 2.7%, 3.2%, 5%, 5.4%, 5.9%) and 7 extra-articular (0%, 0%, 1.2%, 2%, 3.9%, 6.3%, 14%) bone block studies. Postoperative osteoarthritis or progression of preoperative osteoarthritis was reported in 5 intra-articular bone block studies (0%, 5.6%, 23.5%, 23.5%, 25%) and 4 extra-articular bone block studies (0%, 1.9%, 5.2%, 8.6%)., Conclusion: Varying capsular repair methods appeared to provide similar outcomes regarding stability. There was an apparent trend toward higher rates of post-traumatic arthritis among studies in which an intra-articular bone block technique was employed; however, it is possible that this was influenced by substantially different follow-up times between groups and other various sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. There were no studies in the literature directly comparing intra-articular and extra-articular bone block techniques. Large-scale randomized controlled trials or comparative studies are needed to draw stronger conclusions comparing the 2 techniques., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: K.C.D. has received education payments from Gemini Mountain. M.T.P. has received research support from Arthrex, consulting fees from Arthrex and JRF (Allosource), nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and Flexion, and royalties from Arthrex and Arthrosurface. A.A.R. has received research support, consulting fees, nonconsulting fees, and royalties from Arthrex. K.B.F. has received education payments from Liberty Surgical, consulting fees from DePuy/Medical Device Business Services and Vericel, and nonconsulting fees from Aastrom Biosciences and Vericel. R.M.F. has received research support from Arthrex, education payments from Gemini Mountain and Smith & Nephew, consulting fees from Arthrex and JRF (Allosource), and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Instability of the proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) can be post-traumatic or due to accumulative injuries and may also be underdiagnosed pathology that can present with symptoms of lateral and/or medial knee pain. It can be associated with subtle instability and subluxation or frank dislocation of both the PTFJ and the native knee joint. Previously described techniques have been either nonanatomic, require secondary hardware removal, disrupt native anatomy, or fail to account for the inherent stabilizing effect of the lateral collateral ligament, which is likely additionally injured or lax in these patients. The purpose of this Technical Note is to present an open anatomic reconstruction of the PTFJ and lateral collateral ligament using a single semitendinosus allograft, thus restoring all anatomic constraints to the PTFJ and lateral knee.

Background and Hypothesis: The impact of preoperative fatty infiltration of specific rotator cuff muscles on the outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has not been well defined. Preoperative fatty infiltration of the shoulder musculature will negatively affect rTSA outcomes., Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses using PubMed, Embase, OVID Medline, Scopus, Cinahl, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for original, English-language studies evaluating effect of fatty infiltration of shoulder musculature on rTSA outcomes published from January 1, 2000 to present. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screens. All included studies were graded based on the level of evidence, and data concerning patient demographics and postoperative outcomes were extracted., Results: A total of 11 articles were included, including one level I article, three level III articles, and seven level IV articles. The review consisted of 720 patients and 731 shoulders (320 women and 157 men), with a mean age of 72.4 years. A single deltopectoral approach was performed for a majority of studies (627/731 shoulders), followed by a superolateral approach (70/731 shoulders) and a single transdeltoid approach (4/731 patients). Eleven studies reported data specifically about preoperative fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff musculature; the teres minor was studied most widely (298/731 shoulders), followed by the subscapularis (256/731 shoulders) and infraspinatus (232/731 shoulders). The Constant score (562/731 shoulders) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (284/731 shoulders) were the most common recorded outcome scores. Fatty infiltration of the teres minor, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus was associated with worse range of motion after rTSA., Conclusion: Preoperative fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff, particularly of the teres minor and infraspinatus, has a negative impact on subjective patient outcomes and restoration of range of motion, especially external rotation, after rTSA. The impact of fatty infiltration of the other rotator cuff muscles remains unclear, which may be due to intersurgeon differences in the handling of the remaining rotator cuff muscles or differences in implant design. The evaluated literature provides information on which patients can be educated about probable outcomes and restoration of function after rTSA.

Purpose: To review arthroscopic findings at the time of open Latarjet procedures to determine whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging reports (MRRs) correlate with arthroscopic findings, as well as whether the arthroscopic findings critically affected surgical interventions performed at the time of a Latarjet procedure., Methods: This was a retrospective case series of all patients who received a Latarjet procedure between 2006 and 2018. Patients were excluded if they had inadequate records or underwent revision of a bony reconstruction procedure. Both primary Latarjet procedures and Latarjet procedures for revision of a failed arthroscopic procedure were included. MRRs, arthroscopic findings, and diagnoses were collected, and differences were noted. A "critical difference" was one that affected the surgical intervention in a significantly anatomic or procedural fashion or that affected rehabilitation., Results: In total, 154 of 186 patients (83%) were included. Of these, 96 of 154 (62%) underwent revision Latarjet procedures. The average bone loss percentage reported was 20.6% (range, 0%-40%). A critical difference between MRR and arthroscopic findings was noted in 60 of 154 patients (39%), with no difference between Latarjet procedures and revision Latarjet procedures. Of 154 patients, 29 (19%) received an additional 52 intra-articular procedures for diagnoses not made on magnetic resonance imaging, with no difference between primary and revision procedures. This included biceps and/or SLAP pathology requiring a tenodesis, debridement, or repair; rotator cuff pathology requiring debridement or repair; complex (>180°) labral tears requiring repair; loose bodies; and chondral damage requiring debridement or microfracture. Patients undergoing revision Latarjet procedures were less likely to have bone loss mentioned or quantified in the MRR., Conclusions: Diagnostic imaging may not reliably correlate with diagnostic arthroscopic findings at the time of a Latarjet procedure from both a bony perspective and a soft-tissue perspective. In this series, diagnostic arthroscopy affected the surgical plan in addition to the Latarjet procedure in 19% of cases. We recommend performing a diagnostic arthroscopy prior to all Latarjet procedures to identify and/or treat all associated intra-articular shoulder pathologies., Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic case series., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.)

Purpose: To report clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing revision surgery after diagnosis of anchor-induced arthropathy., Methods: Patients who underwent revision arthroscopic shoulder surgery and were diagnosed with post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy performed from January 2006 to May 2018 were included in the current study. Patients were excluded if they underwent prior open shoulder procedures, if glenoid bone loss was present, or if prerevision imaging and records were incomplete or not available. Data included initial diagnosis and index procedure performed, presenting arthropathy symptoms including duration, exam findings before revision surgery, and surgical intervention. PROMs were prospectively collected before surgery and at minimum 2-year follow-up., Results: Fourteen patients were included with a mean (± standard deviation) age at presentation of 35.2 ± 12.1 years (range 16 to 59). The follow-up rate was 86%, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1.1 to 10.6). Mean time to development of arthropathy symptoms was 48.2 months (range <1 month to 13.8 years), all presenting with pain and decreased range of motion on exam. At time of revision surgery, all patients underwent either open or arthroscopic removal of previous implants, including anchors and suture material. Six patients underwent additional revision stabilization procedures, 1 underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, and 7 underwent arthroscopic intraarticular debridement, capsular release, and chondroplasty with or without microfracture. Pain significantly improved in 79% of patients (P = .05). Significant improvements in all PROMs were observed, including 12-item Short Form (43.8 to 54.8, P < .01); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, shortened version (31.8 to 8.4, P < .01); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.0 to 84.5, P < .05); and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (61.6 to 92.1, P < .01). Average external rotation significantly improved, from 31° ± 22° to 52° ± 24° (P = .02)., Conclusion: Rapid intervention after diagnosis, through either revision arthroscopic or open debridement and stabilization, can lead to significant improvement in range of motion, pain, and overall patient function and satisfaction., Level of Evidence: IV, retrospective case series., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Glenoid reconstruction with distal tibial allograft (DTA) is a known surgical option for treating recurrent glenohumeral instability with anterior glenoid bone loss; however, biomechanical analysis has yet to determine how graft variability and fixation options alter the torque of screw insertion and load to failure., Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that retention of the lateral cortex of the DTA graft and the presence of a washer with the screw will significantly increase the maximum screw placement torque as well as the load to failure., Study Design: Controlled laboratory study., Methods: Whole, fresh distal tibias were used to harvest 28 DTA grafts, half of which had the lateral cortex removed and half of which had the lateral cortex intact. The grafts were secured to polyurethane solid foam blocks with a 2-mm epoxy laminate to simulate a glenoid with an intact posterior glenoid cortex. Grafts underwent fixation with 4.0-mm cannulated drills, and screws and washers were used for half of each group of grafts while screws alone were used for the other half, creating 4 equal groups of 7 samples each. A digital torque-measuring screwdriver recorded peak torque for screw insertion. Constructs were then tested in compression with a uniaxial materials testing system and loaded in displacement control at 100 mm/min until at least 3 mm of displacement occurred. Ultimate load was defined as the load sustained at clinical failure., Results: The use of a washer significantly improved the ultimate torque that could be applied to the screws (+cortex and +washer = 12.42 N·m [SE, 0.82]; -cortex and +washer = 10.54 N·m [SE, 0.59]) ( P < .0001), whereas the presence of the native bone cortex did not have a significant effect (+cortex and -washer = 7.83 N·m [SE, 0.40]; -cortex and -washer = 8.03 N·m [SE, 0.56]) ( P = .181)., Conclusion: In a hybrid construct of fresh cadaveric DTA grafts secured to a foam block glenoid model, the addition of washers was more effective than the retention of the lateral distal tibial cortex for both load to failure and peak torque during screw insertion., Clinical Relevance: This biomechanical study is relevant to the surgeon when choosing a graft and selecting fixation options during glenoid reconstruction with a DTA graft., Competing Interests: One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: grafts for distal tibial allografts were donated by JRF Ortho. Screws, washers, fixation instrumentation, and graft preparation station were supplied by Arthrex. S.A.P. has received education payments, consulting fees, and nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and personal fees from Exactech. J.K.E. has received grants from Johnson & Johnson, education payments from Peerless Surgical, consulting fees from Exactech, and hospitality payments from FH Orthopedics. M.T.P. has received consulting fees from Arthrex and JRF Ortho, speaking fees from Arthrex, royalties from Arthrex and Arthrosurface, honoraria from Flexion Therapeutics and JRF Ortho, and personal fees from SLACK and Elsevier. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Purpose: To describe the key clinical, imaging, and arthroscopic characteristics of anchor arthropathy after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures and, secondarily, to define risk factors for the development of anchor-induced arthropathy., Methods: A total of 23 patients who underwent revision arthroscopic shoulder surgery and were diagnosed with glenohumeral arthropathy were retrospectively identified from prospectively collected data registries between January 2000 and May 2018. Data included initial diagnosis and index procedure performed, presenting arthropathy symptoms including duration, and examination findings before revision surgery. Pre-revision imaging was used to assess presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis and chondromalacia, anchors/sutures, loose bodies, and labral pathology. The same parameters were recorded intraoperatively during revision surgery. Descriptive statistics were performed for demographic data and means with standard deviations were calculated for continuous data. A McNemar-Bowker test was used to analyze marginal homogeneity between preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings., Results: Mean age at presentation was 33.4 ± 11.7 years (range 16-59, 17 male patients; 6 female patients). More than one half (13/23) developed symptoms within 10 months after index arthroscopic procedure (mean 32.2 ± 59.9 months, range <1 to 165.2 months) with 87% presenting with pain and 100% presenting with loss of motion on examination. Plain radiographs demonstrated humeral osteoarthritis in 57% (13/23) of patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed recurrent labral pathology in 19 of 23 (83%) patients, potential proud implants in 12 of 23 (52%), and loose bodies in 12 of 23 (52%). Intraoperatively, all had evidence of osteoarthritis; 22 of 23 (96%) had prominent implants. Humeral head chondromalacia was present in 21 of 23 patients (91%), the majority of which was linear stripe wear, and 6 of 23 (26%) had severe global glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Statistical analysis revealed a 54.5% (95% confidence interval 0.327-0.749) sensitivity of MRI identification of proud implants with a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval 0.055-1). The ability of MRI to accurately assess chondromalacia of the humeral head (P = .342) or glenoid (P = .685) was not statistically significant., Conclusions: Anchor arthropathy is characterized by symptoms of pain and stiffness on examination and in many cases develops early after stabilization surgery (<10 months). Implants were implicated in the majority of cases of humeral head chondromalacia. MRI scans may produce false-negative identification of proud implants and can be a poor predictor of the severity of chondromalacia and intra-articular pathology; thus, a high index of clinical suspicion is necessary in patients with motion loss and pain postoperatively., Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measure progression and quality of care. While legacy PROs such as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) survey are well-validated, a lengthy PRO creates a time burden on patients, decreasing adherence. In recent years, PROs such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function and Pain Interference surveys were developed as computer adaptive tests, reducing time to completion. Previous studies have examined correlation between legacy PROs and PROMIS; however, no studies have developed effective prediction models utilizing PROMIS to create an IKDC index. While the IKDC is the standard knee PRO, computer adaptive PROs offer numerous practical advantages., Purpose: To develop a nonlinear predictive model utilizing PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference to estimate IKDC survey scores and examine algorithm sensitivity and validity., Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3., Methods: The MOTION (Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network) database is a prospectively collected repository of PROs and intraoperative variables. Patients undergoing knee surgery completed the IKDC and PROMIS surveys at varying time points. Nonlinear multivariable predictive models using Gaussian and beta distributions were created to establish an IKDC index score, which was then validated using leave-one-out techniques and minimal clinically important difference analysis., Results: A total of 1011 patients completed the IKDC and PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference, providing 1618 complete observations. The algorithms for the Gaussian and beta distribution were validated to predict the IKDC (Pearson = 0.84-0.86; R 2 = 0.71-0.74; root mean square error = 9.3-10.0)., Conclusion: The publicly available predictive models can approximate the IKDC score. The results can be used to compare PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference against historical IKDC scores by creating an IKDC index score. Serial use of the IKDC index allows for a lower minimal clinically important difference than the conventional IKDC. PROMIS can be substituted to reduce patient burden, increase completion rates, and produce orthopaedic-specific survey analogs.

Purpose: We sought to qualitatively and quantitatively describe characteristics of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL) in a cohort of anterior shoulder instability patients using advanced 3-dimensional (3-D) modeling software and assess the impact of various HSL parameters on the HSL volume, location, and orientation in patients with anterior shoulder instability., Methods: A total of 100 recurrent anterior instability patients with evidence of HSL with a mean age of 27.2 years (range = 18 to 43 years) were evaluated. Three-dimensional models of unilateral proximal humeri were reconstructed from CT scans, and the volume, surface area (SA), width, and depth of identified HSLs were quantified along with their location (medial, superior, and inferior extent). Multiple angular orientation measures of HSLs were recorded, including Hill-Sachs rim (HSLr) angle in order to classify the level and location of potential humeral head engagement. Mann-Whitney U test assessed the relationship between measured parameters., Results: By volume, larger HSL had greater humeral head surface area (HH SA) loss (P = .001), HSL width (P = .001), were more medial (P = .015), and more inferior (P = .001). Additionally, more medial lesions had greater HSLr angles (P = 0.001). The mean depth, width, and volume of HSLs were 3.3 mm (range = 1.2-7.1 mm), 16.0 mm (range = 6.2-30.4 mm) and 449.2 mm 3 (range = 62.0-1365.6 mm 3 ), respectively. The medial border of the HSL extended to 17.2 ± 4.4 (range = 9.3-28.3 mm) off the most medial edge of the HH cartilage margin (medialization). The mean HSLr was 29.3 ± 10.5°., Conclusion: There was a statistically significant association between HSL medialization and HSL volume, position, and orientation. More medialized HSL have larger volume, greater width, more SA loss and higher lesion angles and are more inferior in the humeral head. As it has been established that more medialized lesions have poorer clinical outcomes, this study highlights that HS lesions have varying angles and medialization, which may portend eventual treatment and outcomes., Level of Evidence: IV, case series., (Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Partial meniscectomy or failed meniscus repair can lead to pain, dysfunction, and cartilage degradation due to increased contact forces. Meniscus transplantation can lead to favorable outcomes and cartilage preservation with careful patient selection. Limited data exist on segmental meniscus allograft transplantation, with promising results using synthetic grafts and early animal and biomechanical studies on segmental allograft transplantation, showing similar results to full meniscus allograft transplantation. This article presents a technique for arthroscopic segmental medial meniscus allograft transplant and a brief review of the literature., (© 2021 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.)