Search

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity and reliability of responses provided by GPT‐3.5, Google Bard, and Bing to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in the field of endodontics. Methodology: FAQs were formulated by expert endodontists (n = 10) and collected through GPT‐3.5 queries (n = 10), with every question posed to each chatbot three times. Responses (N = 180) were independently evaluated by two board‐certified endodontists using a modified Global Quality Score (GQS) on a 5‐point Likert scale (5: strongly agree; 4: agree; 3: neutral; 2: disagree; 1: strongly disagree). Disagreements on scoring were resolved through evidence‐based discussions. The validity of responses was analysed by categorizing scores into valid or invalid at two thresholds: The low threshold was set at score ≥4 for all three responses whilst the high threshold was set at score 5 for all three responses. Fisher's exact test was conducted to compare the validity of responses between chatbots. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess the reliability by assessing the consistency of repeated responses for each chatbot. Results: All three chatbots provided answers to all questions. Using the low‐threshold validity test (GPT‐3.5: 95%; Google Bard: 85%; Bing: 75%), there was no significant difference between the platforms (p >.05). When using the high‐threshold validity test, the chatbot scores were substantially lower (GPT‐3.5: 60%; Google Bard: 15%; Bing: 15%). The validity of GPT‐3.5 responses was significantly higher than Google Bard and Bing (p =.008). All three chatbots achieved an acceptable level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha >0.7). Conclusions: GPT‐3.5 provided more credible information on topics related to endodontics compared to Google Bard and Bing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aims to correct undercounts in cancer data before initiating a population-based cancer registry program, employing an innovative Bayesian methodology. Background: Underestimation is a widespread issue in cancer registries within developing countries. Methods: This secondary study utilized cancer registry data. We employed the Bayesian approach to correct undercounting in cancer data from 2005 to 2010, using the ratio of pathology to population-based data in the Golestan province as the initial value. Results: The results of this study showed that the lowest percentage of undercounting belonged to Khorasan Razavi province with an average of 21% and the highest percentage belonged to Sistan and Baluchestan province with an average of 38%. The average age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) for all provinces of the country except Golestan province was equal to 105.72 (Confidence interval (CI) 95% 105.35-106.09) per 100,000 and after Bayesian correction was 137.17 (CI 95% 136.74-137.60) per 100,000. In 2010 the amount of ASR before Bayesian correction was 100.28 (CI 95% 124.39-127.09) per 100,000 for women and 136.49 (CI 95% 171.20-174.38) per 100,000 for men. Also, after implementing the Bayesian correction, ASR increased to 125.74 per 100,000 for women and 172.79 per 100,000 for men. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of the Bayesian approach in correcting undercounting in cancer registries. By utilizing the Bayesian method, the average ASR after Bayesian correction with a 29.74 percent change was 137.17 per 100,000. These corrected estimates provide more accurate information on cancer burden and can contribute to improved public health programs and policy evaluation. Furthermore, this research emphasizes the suitability of the Bayesian method for addressing underestimation in cancer registries. It also underscores its pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of future investigations in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) studies are widely used in public health. This study aimed to investigate and compare KAP among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) regarding cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 PCAD patients and 100 CAD patients in a general hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April and October 2022. A valid questionnaire was utilized to gather information, and descriptive analysis and logistic regression were employed for analysis using SPSS, version 23. Results: This study involved 100 CAD and 100 PCAD patients with average ages of 68.09±7.20 and 50.20±7.65 years, respectively. Men accounted for 58% of the PCAD group and 73% of the CAD group. The PCAD group had a higher level of knowledge and exhibited a more positive attitude toward CVD than the CAD group (P=0.007 and P<0.001, respectively). The PCAD patients and those with a family history of chronic diseases had a higher level of knowledge (P=0.045 and P=0.27, respectively) and showed a more positive attitude (P=0.030 and P<0.001, respectively). However, participants with a self-reported history of chronic diseases and those who were employed exhibited a less positive attitude. Occupation was associated with nutritional and smoking status (P=0.037). Conclusion: Higher levels of knowledge and more positive attitudes regarding CVD were observed; still, the study population's behaviors were unsatisfactory. Educational interventions are needed to promote positive health behaviors, emphasizing the link between knowledge and risk reduction and decreased CVD and mortality rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) supplementation in cirrhotic patients. Background: Chronic hepatic inflammation leads to fibrosis and cirrhosis through various mechanisms such as oxidative stress. NAC is one of the intracellular precursors of glutathione that can degrade most reactive oxygen species. Recently, the beneficial effects of NAC in animal and human studies on preventing liver injury progression and improving liver function have been examined. However, more studies on human subjects are still required. Methods: Well-known cirrhotic patients with a specific etiology and aged 18 to 70 years who referred to the gastrointestinal clinic of Ayatollah Taleghani Hospital from December 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled in the present randomized double-blind controlled trial. Patients in the intervention group received NAC tablets at a dose of 600 mg daily, and the control group received a placebo. Demographic data, medical characteristics, and Child-Pugh and MELD scores evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Results: Totally, 60 patients completed the present study (30 patients in the intervention group, and 30 patients in the control group). Hematological and biochemical parameters were normal in both groups with no significant differences at baseline and 6 months after intervention values. Moreover, the renal function indicators including serum creatinine (Cr) and urea (BUN) decreased significantly after intervention. Hepatic parameters also decreased significantly 6 months after intervention. Decreases in the renal and hepatic parameters 6 months after baseline in the control group were not statistically significant. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that NAC improved hepatic and renal function by decreasing serum urea and creatinine levels but had no significant effect on hematological and biochemical parameters. Furthermore, NAC significantly improved hepatic profiles by decreasing ALT, AST, and ALP in the liver enzymes between the intervention and control groups. Moreover, NAC caused a significant decrease in Child-Pugh and MELD scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to detect relationships among quality of life (QoL) and anxiety and demographic factors in patients with celiac disease (CD). Background: CD is a type of autoimmune small intestine diseases caused by gluten ingestion. In Iran, the prevalence of CD is considered to be 1% in the general population. As physical problems and behavioral disorders of CD can lead to a reduction in QoL. Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 533 patients with Celiac Disease from 9 cities of Iran. Data collected were analyzed by SPSS version 22. Quality of life and anxiety respectively evaluated by (GHQ-28) and SAS questionnaires. Predictors of quality of life (sex, age, age of diagnosis, city of life, education level, family history of celiac, occupation and anxiety) were tested by multiple linear regression. Results: Our results showed a significant relationship between poor quality of life and anxiety (correlation= -0.143, P=0.001). The mean of the quality of life index in celiac diseases was 126.2±30.4 and women had a lower quality of life than men (P=0.003) importantly in emotions and worries scores. There was no significant difference between male and female in terms of anxiety level. Conclusion: According to the results, both quality of life and anxiety correlated together and women seem to suffer more than men from celiac disease. Therefore, greater attention to women who have celiac disease are suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In several survival data, a proportion of units is not susceptible to the event of interest, even if, accompanied by a sufficiently large time, which is so-called immune or cured. In this paper, the defective Gamma 3-parameter Gompertz model with a frailty term is proposed for estimating the cure fraction. This model does not require adding extra parameters for modeling the cure rate, and it accommodates unimodal hazard shapes as well as monotone hazards. A simulation study has been carried out to assess the performance of the maximum likelihood estimators. The model was applied to two real data sets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Uncontrolled overproduction of inflammatory mediators is predominantly observed in patients with severe COVID-19. The excessive immune response gives rise to multiple organ dysfunction. Implementing extracorporeal therapies may be useful in omitting inflammatory mediators and supporting different organ systems. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of hemoperfusion in combination with standard therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Method: We conducted a single-center, matched control retrospective study on patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients were treated with hemoperfusion in combination with standard therapy (hemoperfusion group) or standard treatment (matched group). Hemoperfusion or hemoperfusion and continuous renal replacement therapies were initiated in the hemoperfusion group. The patients in the matched group were matched one by one with the hemoperfusion group for age, sex, oxygen saturation (SPO2) at the admission, and the frequency of using invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization. Two types of hemoperfusion cartridges used in this study were Jafron© (HA330) and CytoSorb® 300. Result: A total of 128 COVID-19-confirmed patients were enrolled in this study; 73 patients were allotted to the matched group and 55 patients received hemoperfusion. The median SPO2 at the admission day in the control and hemoperfusion groups was 80% and 75%, respectively (p value = 0.113). The mortality rate was significantly lower in the hemoperfusion group compared to the matched group (67.3% vs. 89%; p value = 0.002). The median length of ICU stay was statistically different in studied groups (median, 12 days for hemoperfusion group vs. 8 days for the matched group; p < 0.001). The median final SPO2 was statistically higher in the hemoperfusion group than in the matched group, and the median PaCO2 was lower. Conclusion: Among critically ill COVID-19 patients, based on our study, the use of hemoperfusion may reduce the mortality rate and improve SPO2 and PaCO2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]