Search

The article discusses the use of antiobesity medications (AOMs) in active-duty military personnel. It highlights the high prevalence of obesity among soldiers and the significant costs associated with obesity-related health care. The study found that only 0.1% of active-duty service members use AOMs, despite a 100-fold increase in prescriptions since their authorization in 2018. The article also discusses the administrative barriers to AOM treatment in the Military Health System and the need for further research on the effects of AOMs on body composition and physical performance in military populations. [Extracted from the article]

Objectives: To improve predictive formulae for estimating body surface area (BSA) in healthy men and women using a modern three‐dimensional scanner technology. Methods: Body surface areas were obtained from a convenience sample of 1267 US Marines (464 women and 803 men) using a whole body surface scanner (Size Stream SS20). The reliability of SS20 measures of total and regional BSA within participants was compared across triplicate scans. We then derived a series of formulae to estimate SS20‐measured BSA using various combinations of sex, height, and mass. We also assessed relationships between percent body fat measured by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry and sex‐specific formulae errors in Marines. Results: Body surface areas recorded by the SS20 were highly reliable whether measured for the total body or by region (ICC ≥.962). Formulae estimates of BSA from sex, height, and mass were precise (root‐mean‐square deviation, 0.031 m2). Errors from the Marine Corps formulae were positively associated with percent body fat for men (p =.001) but not women (p =.843). Conclusions: Clinicians, military leaders, and researchers can use the newly developed BSA formulae for precise estimates in healthy physically active men and women. Users should be aware that height‐ and mass‐based BSA estimates are less accurate for individuals with extremely low or high percent body fat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to model the effect of body armor coverage on body core temperature elevation and wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) offset. Background: Heat stress is a critical factor influencing the health and safety of military populations. Work duration limits can be imposed to mitigate the risk of exertional heat illness and are derived based on the environmental conditions (WBGT). Traditionally a 3°C offset to WBGT is recommended when wearing body armor; however, modern body armor systems provide a range of coverage options, which may influence thermal strain imposed on the wearer. Method: The biophysical properties of four military clothing ensembles of increasing ballistic protection coverage were measured on a heated sweating manikin in accordance with standard international criteria. Body core temperature elevation during light, moderate, and heavy work was modeled in environmental conditions from 16°C to 34°C WBGT using the heat strain decision aid. Results: Increasing ballistic protection resulted in shorter work durations to reach a critical core temperature limit of 38.5°C. Environmental conditions, armor coverage, and work intensity had a significant influence on WBGT offset. Conclusion: Contrary to the traditional recommendation, the required WBGT offset was >3°C in temperate conditions (<27°C WBGT), particularly for moderate and heavy work. In contrast, a lower WBGT offset could be applied during light work and moderate work in low levels of coverage. Application: Correct WBGT offsets are important for enabling adequate risk management strategies for mitigating risks of exertional heat illness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Figueiredo, PS, Looney, DP, Pryor, JL, Doughty, EM, McClung, HL, Vangala, SV, Santee, WR, Beidleman, BA, and Potter, AW. Verification of maximal oxygen uptake in active military personnel during treadmill running. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1053-1058, 2022-It is unclear whether verification tests are required to confirm "true" maximal oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) in modern warfighter populations. Our study investigated the prevalence of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max attainment in U.S. Army soldiers performing a traditional incremental running test. In addition, we examined the utility of supramaximal verification testing as well as repeated trials for familiarization for accurate V[Combining Dot Above]O2max assessment. Sixteen U.S. Army soldiers (1 woman, 15 men; age, 21 +/- 2 years; height, 1.73 +/- 0.06 m; body mass, 71.6 +/- 10.1 kg) completed 2 laboratory visits, each with an incremental running test (modified Astrand protocol) and a verification test (110% maximal incremental test speed) on a motorized treadmill. We evaluated V[Combining Dot Above]O2max attainment during incremental testing by testing for the definitive V[Combining Dot Above]O2 plateau using a linear least-squares regression approach. Peak oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak) was considered statistically equivalent between tests if the 90% confidence interval around the mean difference was within +/-2.1 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1. Oxygen uptake plateaus were identified in 14 of 16 volunteers for visit 1 (87.5%) and all 16 volunteers for visit 2 (100%). Peak oxygen uptake was not statistically equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak measures between the incremental test and verification test on visit 1 (2.3 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1, [1.3-3.2]) or visit 2 (1.1 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 [0.2-2.1]). Interestingly, V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak was equivalent, apparent from the mean difference in V[Combining Dot Above]O2peak measures between visits for the incremental tests (0.0 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 [-0.8 to 0.9]) but not the verification tests (-1.2 ml[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 [-2.2 to -0.2]). Modern U.S. Army soldiers can attain V[Combining Dot Above]O2max by performing a modified Astrand treadmill running test. Additional familiarization and verification tests for confirming V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in healthy active military personnel may be unnecessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]