51. Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models : Evaluation, review and challenges for implementation
- Author
-
Jan Horbowy, Elizabeth I. van Putten, Aniol Esteban, Rik C. Buckworth, Youen Vermard, Sarah Simons, Sophie Gourguet, Francois Bastardie, Rosa Mato-Amboage, Mathieu Merzéréaud, Siems Bossier, Steven Mackinson, Dorleta Garcia, Staffan Waldo, Bruce D. Mapstone, Olivier Guyader, Raúl Prellezo, Sean Pascoe, Daniel S. Holland, Paul Marchal, Stéphanie Mahévas, Clara Ulrich, Heleen Bartelings, Sonia Sanchez, Claire Macher, Ralf Doering, Didier Gascuel, Catherine M. Dichmont, Anton Paulrud, Éva E. Plagányi, Roy Deng, Rolf A. Groeneveld, Artur Palacz, L. Richard Little, Griffin Carpenter, J.M. Da-Rocha, Francesc Maynou, Michel Bertignac, Asbjørn Christensen, Rüdiger Voss, Jose A. Fernandes, Trevor Hutton, J. Rasmus Nielsen, Sigrid Lehuta, Eckhard Bethke, Hans Frost, Jörn Schmidt, Maciej T. Tomczak, Martin F. Quaas, Icarus Allen, Jordi Guillen, Jordi Lleonart, Villy Christensen, Katell G. Hamon, Eric Thunberg, Lars Ravn-Jonsen, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Olivier Thébaud, Loïc Gasche, Ayoe Hoff, Diana van Dijk, André E. Punt, DTU Aqua, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark [Lyngby] (DTU), Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC), NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (CAU), CSIRO Marine and Atmosphere Research [Hobart], Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [Canberra] (CSIRO), University of Washington [Seattle], Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Wageningen University and Research Centre [Wageningen] (WUR), Unité de recherche Sciences et Technologies Halieutiques (STH), Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Thünen-Institute of Sea Fisheries, New economics foundation, University of British Columbia (UBC), Universidate de Vigo, University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (KU), AZTI - Tecnalia, Écologie et Modèles pour l'halieutique (EMH), Écologie et santé des écosystèmes (ESE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Aménagement des Usages des Ressources et des Espaces marins et littoraux - Centre de droit et d'économie de la mer (AMURE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (IUEM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Institute of Marine Sciences / Institut de Ciències del Mar [Barcelona] (ICM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Spain] (CSIC), National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Scottish Pelagic Fishermen's Association, Laboratoire Ressources halieutiques Manche Mer du nord, IFREMER Centre Manche Mer du Nord, (HMMN), Swedish Agency for Marine Water Management, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Stockholm University, Swiss Federal Insitute of Aquatic Science and Technology [Dübendorf] (EAWAG), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), Universidade de Vigo, Écologie et Modèles pour l'Halieutique (IFREMER EMH), Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer - Atlantique (IFREMER Atlantique), Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (IUEM), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Danmarks Tekniske Universitet = Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Sciences et Technologies Halieutiques (STH), University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), Écologie et Modèles pour l'Halieutique (EMH), Laboratoire Ressources halieutiques Boulogne sur mer (LRHBL), and Halieutique Manche Mer du Nord (HMMN)
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Performance and Impact Agrosectors ,Oceanography ,01 natural sciences ,Performance en Impact Agrosectoren ,Environmental Economics and Natural Resources ,Multidisciplinary approach ,International Policy ,Comparative model evaluation ,Bio‐economic models ,Ecology ,Communication ,Environmental resource management ,Social dynamics ,Ecologically sustainable development ,Performance criteria and scales and risks ,Bio-economic models ,Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models ,Marine spatial planning and cross‐sector management ,Marine conservation ,Use and acceptance and implementation and communication and flexibility and complexity ,Performance criteria ,[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes ,5312.01 Agricultura, Silvicultura, Pesca ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Aquatic Science ,010603 evolutionary biology ,12. Responsible consumption ,Scales and risks ,14. Life underwater ,SDG 14 - Life Below Water ,bio-economic models ,Internationaal Beleid ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Flexibility (engineering) ,marine spatial planning and cross-sector management ,User Friendly ,WIMEK ,business.industry ,Marine spatial planning and cross-sector management ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Marine spatial planning ,Cross-sector management ,Complexity ,Integrated ecological-economic fisheries models ,Fishery ,Acceptance ,13. Climate action ,Implementation ,Sustainability ,[SDV.SA.STP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Agricultural sciences/Sciences and technics of fishery ,Fisheries management advice ,Flexibility ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,business ,Milieueconomie en Natuurlijke Hulpbronnen - Abstract
Nielsen, J.R. ... et al.-- 29 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables, supporting information https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12232, Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area‐specific pressures. To fulfil society's intensifying and diversifying needs while ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader‐scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models (IEEFMs) of marine systems are needed to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anticipate ecological, economic and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This article presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IEEFMs applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes although not all the models reviewed achieve that. Modellers must invest more time to make models user friendly and to participate in management fora where models and model results can be explained and discussed. Such involvement is beneficial to all parties, leading to improvement of mo‐dels and more effective implementation of advice, but demands substantial resources which must be built into the governance process. It takes time to develop effective processes for using IEEFMs requiring a long‐term commitment to integrating multidisciplinary modelling advice into management decision‐making
- Published
- 2018