51. Positive end-expiratory pressure affects the value of intra-abdominal pressure in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients
- Author
-
Daniel Verzilli, Gerald Chanques, Samir Jaber, Pierre-François Perrigault, Boris Jung, Manu L N G Malbrain, Jean-Michel Constantin, Mustapha Sebbane, Supporting clinical sciences, Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Passerieux, Emilie
- Subjects
Male ,Cardiac output ,ARDS ,Abdominal compartment syndrome ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Pilot Projects ,Lung injury ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Positive-Pressure Respiration ,03 medical and health sciences ,pressure ,0302 clinical medicine ,Abdomen ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Positive end-expiratory pressure ,Mechanical ventilation ,Medicine(all) ,Respiratory Distress Syndrome ,[SDV.MHEP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology ,business.industry ,Research ,cardiac output ,Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,respiratory system ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,acute lung injury ,intra-abdominal pressure ,SAPS II ,Anesthesia ,Female ,business ,therapeutics ,[SDV.MHEP]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology ,circulatory and respiratory physiology - Abstract
International audience; Introduction: To examine the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI).Methods: Thirty sedated and mechanically ventilated patients with ALI or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to a sixteen-bed surgical medical ICU were included. All patients were studied with sequentially increasing PEEP (0, 6 and 12 cmH2O) during a PEEP-trial.Results: Age was 55 ± 17 years, weight was 70 ± 17 kg, SAPS II was 44 ± 14 and PaO2/FIO2 was 192 ± 53 mmHg. The IAP was 12 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 0 (zero end-expiratory pressure, ZEEP), 13 ± 5 mmHg at PEEP 6 and 15 ± 6 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.05 vs ZEEP). In the patients with intra-abdominal hypertension defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP significantly increased from 15 ± 3 mmHg at ZEEP to 20 ± 3 mmHg at PEEP 12 (P < 0.01). Whereas in the patients with IAP < 12 mmHg (n = 15), IAP did not significantly change from ZEEP to PEEP 12(8 ± 2 vs 10 ± 3 mmHg). In the 13 patients in whom cardiac output was measured, increase in PEEP from 0 to 12 cmH2O did not significantly change cardiac output, nor in the 8 out of 15 patients of the high-IAP group. The observed effects were similar in both ALI (n = 17) and ARDS (n = 13) patients.Conclusions: PEEP is a contributing factor that impacts IAP values. It seems necessary to take into account the level of PEEP whilst interpreting IAP values in patients under mechanical ventilation.
- Published
- 2010