Search

Objectives: To describe antibiotic use in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and in the background population (BP) within one year before and after IA diagnosis., Methods: Using data from Danish nationwide registries, we identified all adults with a first-time diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis/spondyloarthritis (AS/SpA) from 2010 through 2018. For each IA patient, we randomly sampled ten persons from the BP, matched on sex and birthdate. We calculated the prevalence (n [%]) of any antibiotic dispensing and the total antibiotic dispensing in the year before and after diagnosis., Results: We identified 28 504 new-onset IA patients (RA, n = 16 130; PsA, n = 5,988; AS/SpA, n = 6,386) and 285 040 BP individuals. The one-year prevalence of any antibiotic dispensing was 42.1% in IA patients before diagnosis vs 30.7% in the BP. The total antibiotic dispensing was higher the one-year before both RA, PsA, and As/SpA compared with BP (prevalence rate ratios [PRR], 1.48 [1.46; 1.51]; 1.67 [1.62; 1.72]; 1.52 [1.47; 1.56], respectively), and increased with 22% in IA patients three months before diagnosis compared with the preceding three-month period. Although the prevalence of any antibiotic dispensing in IA patients decreased in the year following the diagnosis (IA; 40.6%), the total one-year antibiotic dispensing remained constant in RA (PRR 0.99 [0.97; 1.01]), decreased in PsA (0.91 [0.87; 0.94]), and increased in AS/SpA (1.08 [1.04; 1.12]) patients after diagnosis compared with before., Conclusion: Antibiotics are more frequently dispensed to individuals developing IA compared with the BP. Antibiotic utilisation patterns change after IA diagnosis with marked differences among IA subgroups., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treat-to-target strategies (disease activity, remission rates) and access to physical consultations in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease, as well as to explore characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations in the clinic and the impact of early vs established disease., Methods: Patients with RA, PsA or axial SpA (axSpA) prospectively followed in the nationwide DANBIO registry answered online questionnaires and reported patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in June and November 2020. Patient characteristics, disease activity and physical consultations in the clinic before and during the pandemic were identified in DANBIO [all patients and subgroups with early disease (disease duration ≤2 years)]. In individual patients, changes in PROs before and during the pandemic were calculated. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations were described (age, gender, education level, comorbidities, disease duration, treatment)., Results: We included 7836 patients (22% of eligible patients), 12% of which had early disease. PROs were stable before and during the pandemic, with median changes approximating zero, as well as in patients with early disease. Remission rates were stable. The relative decrease in the number of patients with physical consultations was 21-72%, which was highest in axSpA. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations were similar. Self-reported satisfaction with treatment options and access was >70%; the preferred contact form was physical consultation (66%)., Conclusion: In this nationwide study performed during the first 8 months of the pandemic, patient satisfaction was high and the PROs and remission rates remained stable despite the remarkable reduction in physical consultations, as well as in patients with early disease. Characteristics of patients with/without physical consultations appeared similar., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a collectin with immuno-regulatory functions, which may depend on oligomerization. Anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties have been attributed to multimeric SP-D variants, while trimeric subunits per se have been suggested to enhance inflammation. Previously, we reported low circulating SP-D in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the present investigation aims to extend these data by serial SP-D serum measurements, studies on synovial fluid, SP-D size distribution and genotyping in patients with early RA., Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) naïve RA patients with disease duration less than six months were studied prospectively for four years (CIMESTRA (Ciclosporine, Methotrexate, Steroid in RA) trial) including disease activity measures (C-reactive protein, joint counts and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score), autoantibodies, x-ray findings and SP-D. SP-D was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and molecular size distribution was assessed by gel filtration chromatography. Further, SP-D Met11Thr single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was performed., Results: Serum SP-D was significantly lower in RA patients at baseline compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). SP-D increased slightly during follow-up (P < 0.001), but was still subnormal at four years after adjustment for confounders (P < 0.001). SP-D in synovial fluid was up to 2.5-fold lower than in serum. While multimeric variants were detected in serum, SP-D in synovial fluid comprised trimeric subunits only. There were no significant associations between genotype distribution and SP-D. Baseline SP-D was inversely associated to CRP and HAQ score. A similar relationship was observed regarding temporal changes in SP-D and CRP (zero to four years). SP-D was not associated to x-ray findings., Conclusions: This study confirms that circulating SP-D is persistently subnormal in early and untreated RA despite a favourable therapeutic response obtained during four years of follow-up. SP-D correlated negatively to disease activity measures, but was not correlated with x-ray progression or SP-D genotype. These observations suggest that SP-D is implicated in RA pathogenesis at the protein level. The exclusive presence of trimeric SP-D in affected joints may contribute to the maintenance of joint inflammation., Trial Registration: (j.nr NCT00209859).