51. Investigation on Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer among Elderly Patients Treated with Chinese Herbal Medicine versus Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Data
- Author
-
Jing Qiao, Xiaoshu Zhu, Shutang Wang, Hezheng Lai, Lingling Sun, Lizhu Lin, Wan Sze Yim, and Paul Fahey
- Subjects
Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Article Subject ,medicine.medical_treatment ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Lung cancer ,Chemotherapy ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,lcsh:Other systems of medicine ,lcsh:RZ201-999 ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Pooled analysis ,Complementary and alternative medicine ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,business ,Research Article ,Cohort study - Abstract
Purpose. Many patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) seek help from Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival between CHM and chemotherapy (CT) treatment of patients aged ≥60 years with advanced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) wild type NSCLC and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥ 60. Methods. We extracted individual data of all eligible patients from 1 randomized control trial and 2 cohort studies and performed a pooled analysis. Survival outcomes of patients were compared between CHM group and CT group using Cox regression model stratified for study. Results. A total of 486 patients were included in the study, including 262 patients in the CHM group and 224 patients in the CT group. The median overall survival time was 10.9 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 8.9-13.0) months in CHM group and 9.8 (95% CI: 8.1-11.5) days in CT group (p=0.592). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for CHM compared to CT are 0.98 (0.87, 1.10, p=0.751) in the stratified Cox regression model. Stratified analysis showed a trend that previously treated elderly patients with EGFR wild type advanced NSCLC probably gain greater survival benefit from CHM (adjusted HR:0.83, 95% CI: 0.68-1.01, p=0.063). Conclusions. There might be no significant difference in survival for elderly patients with advanced EGFR wild type NSCLC between the CHM and CT groups in the current study. And previously treated elderly patients with advanced NSCLC probably receive greater benefit from CHM. However, limited by the design and unpreplanned study hypothesis, the results must be confirmed by randomized control trial before making a conclusion.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF