Search

As recommended by current NCCN guidelines, patients with very low-risk prostate cancer may be treated with active surveillance (AS), but this may be underutilized. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified men (2010-2013) with biopsy-proven, very low-risk prostate cancer that met AS criteria as suggested by Epstein (stage ≤ T1c; Gleason score (GS) ≤ 6; PSA < 10; and ≤2 [or <33%] positive biopsy cores) and aged ≤76, and low comorbidity index (Charlson-Deyo score = 0). For those patients meeting this criteria, we performed generalized estimation equation (GEE) method with incorporation of correlation in patients clustered within facility to determine the likelihood of undergoing AS. Among the 448 773 patients in the NCDB with low-risk prostate cancer, 40 839 patients met the inclusion criteria. AS was utilized in 5798 patients (14.2%), while within the very low-risk patients receiving treatment, up to 52.2% received radical prostatectomy. In univariate analyses, AS utilization was associated with older age, uninsured status (compared to private insurance), farther distance from facility, academic/research institutions and particularly in the New England region (all P < 0.01). After adjustments of other predictors in multivariate analysis, patients preferentially received AS if they were older (all OR's > 1 compared to younger groups), uninsured (vs. any insurance type, OR's > 1); or treated at academic/research center (OR > 1). The overall use of AS increased from 11.6% (2010) to 27.3% (2013). We found a low, but rising rate of AS in a nationally representative group of very low-risk prostate cancer patients. Disparities in the use of AS may be targeted to improve adherence to national guidelines., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Little data exist on effect of undergoing laparoscopic prostatectomy(LP) versus open prostatectomy(OP) upon 30-day mortality rates among low-risk prostate cancer patients., Materials and Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men (2004 to 2013) with biopsy-proven, low-risk prostate cancer who met the eligibility criteria: N0, M0, T-stage≤2A, PSA≤10 ng/mL, and Gleason score=6. We utilized a 1:N matched case-control study, with cases and controls matched by race, insurance status, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, surgical margin status, and facility type to investigate the short-term comparative effectiveness of LP versus OP., Results: Among the 448,773 patients in the National Cancer Database with low-risk prostate cancer, 116,359 patients met the above inclusion criteria. The target group was restricted to patients who received LP or OP, thus, leaving 44,720 patients for the study. The use of LP (compared with OP) was associated with patients with privately insured patients, treatment at an academic/research centers, high-volume hospitals, and white race (all P <0.01). LP was less frequently utilized for black patients, those who received treatment at community centers, and for those with Medicaid insurance(all P <0.01). The odds ratio of death for surgery type (laparoscopy vs. open) was estimated at 0.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.135-0.701; P <0.05). Thus, the risk of death within 30 days was 69% lower with LP compared with OP., Conclusions: We found that the 30-day mortality rate among low-risk prostate cancer patients is significantly lower among patients who received LP when compared with OP, with various clinicopathologic parameters associated with its preferential use.

Purpose: We examined national outcomes and patterns of care for pediatric patients with medulloblastoma (MB) in a large observational cohort., Methods and Materials: Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated the clinical features and survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with MB. The association between intervention, covariables, and outcome was assessed in a multivariable Cox analysis and through logistic regression analysis. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 4032 patients in the National Cancer Database with pediatric brain tumors, 1300 patients met the inclusion criteria of histologic diagnosis, receipt of chemotherapy and radiation, and age ≤18 years. The median age and follow-up were 8.4 years and 4.5 years, respectively. Five-year survival was 79.0%. In the univariate analysis, inferior outcome (overall survival) was associated with rural residence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.47-5.29; P  < .01) and histology (large cell; HR, 1.78; 95% CI,1.08-2.94; P  < .05). In multivariable analysis, both remained significant predictors of survival (large cell: HR, 1.68; P  < .05; rural residence: HR, 2.74; P  < .01). In 2013, the utilization rate of proton therapy (23% of patients) in the United States surpassed intensity modulate radiation therapy (16%), more frequently for patients with higher income ( P  < .05) or more favorable insurance status ( P  < .05)., Conclusions: As one of the largest data sets on pediatric MB, the observed variations in treatment intervention and survival outcomes may represent a target for further research.

Background: The role of local therapy, in the form of radiation therapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy(RP), and its association on outcomes is not well established in patients with metastatic prostate cancer., Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we evaluated patterns of care and outcomes among patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer from 2004 to 2013 treated with local therapy (RP, intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT], or 2D/3D-conformal radiation therapy [CRT]). The association between local therapy, co-variates, and outcomes was assessed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to balance confounding factors. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 1,208,180 patients in the NCDB with prostate cancer, 6,051 patients met the inclusion criteria. No local therapy was used in 5,224 patients, while 622 (10.3%), 52 (0.9%), 153 (2.5%) patients received RP, IMRT, and 2D/3D-CRT, respectively. Use of local therapy was associated with younger age (≤70), lower co-morbidity score, lower T-stage, Gleason score <8, node-negative status, private, and Medicare insurance, higher income quartile, and treatment at comprehensive or academic/research programs (P < 0.05). Five-year overall survival for patients receiving local therapy was 45.7% versus 17.1% for those not receiving local therapy (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, RP (HR = 0.51; 95%CI, 0.45-0.59, P < 0.01) and IMRT (HR = 0.47; 95%CI, 0.31-0.72, P < 0.01) were independently associated with superior overall survival. After PS-matching, the use of local therapy (RP or IMRT) remained significantly associated with overall survival (HR = 0.35; 95%CI, 0.30-0.41, P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The use of RP and IMRT, to treat the primary disease, was associated with improvements in overall survival for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We have identified patient-specific variations in the use of local therapy that may be tested in subsequent prospective clinical trials to improve patient outcomes in this setting. Prostate 77: 559-572, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between RT and overall survival for older patients (>60 years) with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using standard and propensity score (PS)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. From 1998 to 2012, 2207 patients were over the age of 60 years, received chemoimmunotherapy with or without RT and were included in this study. Use of consolidation RT was associated with lower clinical stage, head/neck involved site, lack of 'B' symptoms, lower co-morbidity score, and higher socioeconomic status (all p < .05). Examining 1721 patients for survival outcomes (1998-2008), the 5-year overall survival for patients receiving RT was 80.1% versus 69.8% for those not receiving RT (p < .01). After PS-matching for co-variates, RT use remained associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.51-0.79, p < .01). Over the study period, RT utilization decreased from 38.5% to 28.8%. Consolidation RT was associated with improved OS for older patients with early-stage DLBCL receiving chemoimmunotherapy.

Background: We evaluated the dosimetric differences between proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for resected thymoma. We simultaneously report our early clinical experience with PBT in this cohort., Patients and Methods: We identified 4 patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma treated at our center from 2012 to 2014 who completed adjuvant PBT to a median dose of 57.0 cobalt Gy equivalents (CGE; range, 50.4-66.6 CGE) after definitive resection. Adjuvant radiation was indicated for positive (n = 3) or close margin (n = 1). Median age was 45 (range, 32-70) years. Stages included II (n = 2), III (n = 1), and IVA (n = 1). Analogous IMRT plans were generated for each patient for comparison, and preset dosimetric endpoints were evaluated. Early toxicities were assessed according to retrospective chart review., Results: Compared with IMRT, PBT was associated with lower mean doses to the lung (4.6 vs. 8.1 Gy; P = .02), esophagus (5.4 vs. 20.6 Gy; P = .003), and heart (6.0 vs. 10.4 Gy; P = .007). Percentages of lung, esophagus, and heart receiving radiation were consistently lower in the PBT plans over a wide range of radiation doses. There was no difference in mean breast dose (2.68 vs. 3.01 Gy; P = .37). Of the 4 patients treated with PBT, 3 patients experienced Grade 1 radiation dermatitis, and 1 patient experienced Grade 2 dermatitis, which resolved after treatment. With a median follow-up of 5.5 months, there were no additional Grade ≥ 2 acute or subacute toxicities, including radiation pneumonitis., Conclusion: PBT is clinically well tolerated after surgical resection of thymoma, and is associated with a significant reduction in dose to critical structures without compromising coverage of the target volume. Prospective evaluation and longer follow-up is needed to assess clinical outcomes and late toxicities., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Temozolomide given concurrently with radiation after resection/biopsy improves survival in glioblastoma (GBM). The disparities in receipt of adjuvant single-agent chemotherapy and their association with outcome have not been well established. Observational study of a prospectively collected database, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), from 1998 to 2012 with median follow-up 12.4 months. Among the 114,979 patients in the NCDB with GBM, 44,531 patients were analyzed for disparities, and 28,279 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS). Associations were assessed in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median age was 58 years. Chemotherapy use was associated with male gender, white race, younger age (≤50), higher performance status (≥70), more extensive surgery, insurance status, higher income/education, and treatment at academic centers (all p < 0.05). We found improved OS associated with type of insurance (private insurance HR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.85-0.96 and Medicare HR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.16-1.33, both p < 0.01 compared to uninsured) and treatment at academic programs (HR 0.86; p < 0.01). MGMT methylation status predicted improved OS (HR 0.54; 95 % CI 0.41-0.70, p < 0.01). 1-year OS for patients receiving chemotherapy was 55.9 % versus 35.3 % for those without (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, chemotherapy use remained associated with improved OS (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.63-0.66, p < 0.01). Chemotherapy utilization increased from 26.9 to 93.3 % during the study period. We have identified specific disparities in the use of chemotherapy that may be targeted to improve patient access to care. Widespread adoption of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after resection or biopsy for GBM appears to improve OS.

The purpose of this large observational study was to examine outcomes in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) by timing to definitive chemotherapy (TTC) using standard and propensity score (PS)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. From 1998-2011, 56,457 patients with stage I-IV HL were studied, with a median follow-up of 6.0 years (median age=39). Median TTC was 26 days from diagnosis. The cohort of "early" (<60 days from diagnosis) TTC patients included 45,307 (80.3%) patients and "late" (≥60 days) TTC was 11,150 (19.7%). Patients were more likely to experience early TTC if they were of a younger age, at an advanced stage, with "B" symptoms, favorably insured, favorable socioeconomic status, and treated at comprehensive cancer center (all p<0.05). Ten-year overall survival for patients with early TTC was 73.2% vs. 70.0% for those with late TTC (HR=0.87; 95%CI, 0.83-0.92, p<0.0001). After PS-matching for co-variates, early TTC was not associated with overall survival (HR=0.96; 95%CI, 0.85-1.08, p=0.51). This represents the only study to evaluate overall survival by time to definitive treatment for HL.

The purpose of this study was to use the National Cancer Database to examine the association between radiation therapy (RT) and overall survival (OS) in early-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) using standard and propensity score (PS)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. From 1998-2011, 1915 patients with stage I/II NLPHL were studied, with a median follow-up of 6.6 years (median age = 44). Of the cohort, 1224(64%) received RT (alone or with chemotherapy) to a median dose of 30.6 Gy. Patients were more likely to receive RT if male, younger age, lower stage, no "B"-symptoms, favorably insured, and treatment at comprehensive centers (all p < 0.05). Patients administered RT had an improved 5-year OS (HR = 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43-0.89, p = 0.01). After PS-matching (n = 868) based on all known co-variates, RT use trended towards improved OS (HR = 0.49; 95%CI, 0.23-1.05, p = 0.06). This study represents one of the largest prospective datasets examining the role of RT for stage I/II NLPHL and inclusion of RT may be considered.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients receiving IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy), versus those receiving 2D/3D-CRT (3-dimensional conformal RT) in a large observational cohort., Patients and Methods: We evaluated patients diagnosed with stage I-IV HL from 1998 to 2011 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The association between IMRT use vs. 2D/3D-CRT, co-variables, and outcome was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to balance known confounding factors. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Of the 76,672 patients with HL within the NCDB, 12,393 patients with stage I-IV HL received RT (median dose=30.6 Gy) and were eligible for this study, and 6013 patients analyzed for overall survival. The cohort had a median follow-up of 6.2 years and median age of 37 years (range: 18-90). The RT modalities used were: 2D/3D-CRT (n=11,491, 92.7%) or IMRT (n=902, 7.3%). Patients were more likely to receive IMRT if they were of male gender, early stage, no "B" symptoms, and treated at comprehensive cancer programs (all p<0.05). During this time period, there was a significant decrease in use of 2D/3D-CRT from 100% to 81.5%, with a subsequent increase in IMRT utilization from 0% to 18.5%. Five-year overall survival for patients receiving 2D/3D-CRT (n=5844) was 89.9% versus 95.2% for those receiving IMRT (n=169; HR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91, p=0.02). After PS-matching based on clinicopathologic characteristics, IMRT use remained associated with improved overall survival (HR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.97, p=0.04)., Conclusions: Our study reveals that HL patients receiving modern RT techniques were associated with an improvement in overall survival. This may have been related to patient selection, access to improved staging and management, or improvements in treatment technology. This represents the only study examining survival outcomes of advanced RT modalities, which may be considered on a case-by-case basis for highly selected patients with HL., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and outcomes of the clinical use of LINAC (linear accelerator)-based flattening-filter-free beams for delivering ablative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for trigeminal neuralgia (TN)., Methods and Materials: Thirty-six consecutive patients (34 unique patients) followed up by a single neurosurgeon and diagnosed with medically refractory unilateral TN were treated with SRS. There were 14 left-sided cases (41%) and 20 right-sided cases (59%). Twenty-eight of the patients (82%) had type 1 TN, and 6 (18%) had type 2 TN. Previous treatments were as follows: 10 patients (29%) had SRS to the ipsilateral TN (8 with Gamma Knife, 2 with LINAC), 4 (12%) had percutaneous rhizotomy, and 3 (9%) had microvascular decompression. A median prescription dose of 75 Gy (range, 70-80 Gy), prescribed to the 100% isodose line, was delivered in a single fraction. Before treatment delivery, image guidance verified stereotactic frame placement, head position, and final isocenter. The volume of brainstem receiving ≥10 Gy was <0.5 cm(3). At each visit, patients prospectively reported outcomes using the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain scale., Results: With a median follow-up of 3.1 months (range, 0.6-24.3; mean, 5.5 months), no patient experienced grade 1+ toxicities. There were no new episodes of dysesthesia, hypoesthesia, or long-term complications related to SRS. Median baseline (pre-SRS) BNI score was 5.0 (mean, 4.7). Clinical assessment at first follow-up (median, 1 month) demonstrated a median BNI score of 3.0 (mean, 3.1). When stratified by TN subtype, both type 1 and type 2 TN patients had a median BNI score of 3.0 at first follow-up. Thirty patients (88.2%) achieved a reduction in their BNI at their first follow-up, and 5 patients (15%) achieved a score <3, which represents medication-free pain relief. The median BNI at second follow-up (average, 6.3 months) was 2.5., Conclusions: We report our experience with modern LINAC-based SRS using flattening-filter-free beams for TN. This treatment appears to be a safe and effective technique, although longer follow-up is needed to confirm durability. This modality may prove to be a viable treatment alternative for TN., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the association between radiation therapy (RT) utilization and overall survival (OS) for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)., Methods and Materials: Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated clinical features and survival outcomes among patients diagnosed with stage I/II HL from 1998 to 2011. The association between RT use, covariables, and outcome was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Propensity score matching was performed to balance observed confounding factors. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 41,943 patients in the National Cancer Database with stage I/II HL, 29,752 patients were analyzed for this study. Radiation therapy use was associated with younger age (≤40 years), favorable insured status, higher socioeconomic status (income, education), and treatment at comprehensive community cancer centers (all P<.05). Five-year OS for patients receiving RT was 94.5%, versus 88.9% for those not receiving RT (P<.01). Radiation therapy use was a significant predictor of OS in the "As-Treated" cohort (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.58, P<.01) and intention-to-treat analysis (P<.01). After propensity score matching based on clinicopathologic characteristics, RT use remained associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.56, P<.01). Over the study period, RT utilization for this cohort decreased from 55% to 44%, most commonly because it was not part of the planned initial treatment strategy., Conclusions: Consolidation RT was associated with improved OS for patients with early-stage classic HL. We also have identified patient-specific variations in the use of RT that may be targeted to improve patient access to care., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The association between insurance status and outcomes has not been well established for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The purpose of this study was to examine the disparities in overall survival (OS) by insurance status in a large cohort of patients with HL., Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to evaluate patients with stage I to IV HL from 1998 to 2011. The association between insurance status, covariables, and outcomes was assessed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 76,681 patients within the NCDB, 45,777 patients with stage I to IV HL were eligible for this study (median follow-up, 6.0 years). The median age was 39 years (range, 18-90 years). The insurance status was as follows: 3247 (7.1%) were uninsured, 7962 (17.4%) had Medicaid, 30,334 (66.3%) had private insurance, 3746 (8.2%) had managed care, and 488 (1.1%) had Medicare. Patients with an unfavorable insurance status (Medicaid/uninsured) were at a more advanced stage, had higher comorbidity scores, had B symptoms, and were in a lower income/education quartile (all P < .01). These patients were less likely to receive radiotherapy and start chemotherapy promptly and were less commonly treated at academic/research centers (all P < .01). Patients with unfavorable insurance had a 5-year OS of 54% versus 87% for those favorably insured (P < .01). When adjustments were made for covariates, an unfavorable insurance status was associated with significantly decreased OS (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.91; P < .01). The unfavorable insurance status rate increased from 22.8% to 28.8% between 1998 and 2011., Conclusions: This study reveals that HL patients with Medicaid and uninsured patients have outcomes inferior to those of patients with more favorable insurance. Targeting this subset of patients with limited access to care may help to improve outcomes. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society., (© 2015 American Cancer Society.)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome and patterns of failure in patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT) for orbital lymphoma (OL). Seventy-nine patients diagnosed with stage IE OL between 1995 and 2012 were included. Fifty-nine patients (75%) had mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and 20 patients (25%) had follicular lymphoma subtype. The median follow-up was 49.7 months. Major tumor sites were conjunctiva (29%), orbit (47%) and lacrimal gland (24%). After treatment to a median dose of 30.6 Gy, there were a total of no local, one contralateral orbital, two regional and two distant recurrences, all outside of the treatment fields. The 10-year local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free and overall survival rates were 100%, 94.2% and 98.2%, respectively. Definitive RT to 30 Gy was shown to be highly effective for indolent OL, and this study represents one of the largest single-institution studies using primary RT for stage IE OL.

Small, hormone receptor-positive breast carcinomas in older women are associated with low local recurrence rates. The relative benefits of adjuvant hormonal therapy remain unclear in elderly women with small, node-negative breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. From our institutional data base, 224 patients ≥65 years of age with T1N0M0 breast cancer treated with BCS+RT were identified. Of these, 102 patients (45.5%) received tamoxifen (TAM) and 122 patients (54.5%) did not (no-TAM). The median follow-up time was 62.6 months. The 10-year local relapse-free survival (LRFS) was 98% in both the TAM and no-TAM cohorts (p = 0.58); the 10-year DMFS was 83% TAM vs. 89% no-TAM (p = 0.91). There was no difference in 10-year contralateral breast relapse or overall survival (OS) between the two cohorts. In univariate and multivariate analysis, use of TAM was not associated with LRFS, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), OS, or a reduction in contralateral breast cancers when compared with the no-TAM cohort. In this large cohort of T1N0 elderly breast cancer patients treated with CS+RT, the use of TAM did not appear to decrease ipsilateral breast relapse, contralateral breast relapse, distant metastasis, or OS., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: To compare the clinical-pathologic features and long-term outcomes for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) vs. DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) treated with breast conservation therapy (BCT), to assess the impact of microinvasion., Patients and Methods: A total of 393 patients with DCIS/DCISM from our database were analyzed to assess differences in clinical-pathologic features and outcomes for the two cohorts., Results: The median follow-up was 8.94 years, and the mean age was 55.8 years for the entire group. The DCISM cohort was comprised of 72 of 393 patients (18.3%). Surgical evaluation of the axilla was performed in 58.3% (n = 42) of DCISM vs. 18.1% (n = 58) of DCIS, with only 1 of 42 DCISM (2.3%) vs. 0 of 58 DCIS with axillary metastasis. Surgical axillary evaluation was not an independent predictor of local-regional relapse (LRR), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), or overall survival (OS) in Cox proportional hazards analysis (p > 0.05). For the DCIS vs. DCISM groups, respectively, the 10-year breast relapse-free survival was 89.0% vs. 90.7% (p = 0.36), DRFS was 98.5% vs. 97.9% (p = 0.78), and OS was 93.2% vs. 95.7% (p = 0.95). The presence of microinvasion did not correlate with LRR, age, presentation, race, family history, margin status, and use of adjuvant hormonal therapy (all p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, pathology (DCIS vs. DCISM) was not an independent predictor of LRR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-4.30; p = 0.36), DRFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.07-6.95; p = 0.77), or OS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.28-3.82; p = 0.95)., Conclusions: Our data imply that the natural history of DCISM closely resembles that of DCIS, with a low incidence of local-regional and distant failures. On the basis of our large dataset, the incidence of axillary metastasis in DCISM appears to be small and not appear to correlate to outcomes, and thus, microinvasion alone should not be the sole criterion for more aggressive treatment., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The excision repair cross-complementation 1 (ERCC1) enzyme plays a rate-limiting role in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and is associated with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in cancers of the head and neck and the lung. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of ERCC1 expression in a cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy., Methods and Materials: Paraffin specimens from 504 women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy were constructed into tissue microarrays. The array was stained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and ERCC1. This was then correlated with clinicopathologic factors and outcomes data., Results: ERCC-1 expression was evaluable in 366 cases (72%). In this group, 32% and 38% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, respectively. Increased ERCC-1 expression was found to be correlated with ER positivity (p < 0.005), lower T stage (p < 0.017), nodal negativity (p < 0.013), age >50 (p < 0.006), reduced use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.02), and increased use of adjuvant hormonal therapy (p < 0.004). ERCC1 expression did not correlate with locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, cause-specific survival, or overall survival. In patients who were both ERCC1-negative and -positive, the use of chemotherapy predicted for worse distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.05 and p = 0.07, respectively) but not cause-specific survival or overall survival., Conclusions: Although ERCC1 expression did not predict for outcome measures in this dataset, overexpression correlated with favorable prognostic factors such as ER positivity, lower T stage, nodal negativity, and age >50. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating ERCC1 expression in patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy for breast cancer., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of triple-negative (TN) ER, PR, Her2/neu basal-like carcinoma of the breast, at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after conservative surgery and radiation treatment (RT)., Methods and Materials: A tissue microarray was constructed of 47 IBTR specimens of patients who experienced an IBTR after conservative surgery and RT that were processed and stained for ER, PR, and HER2/neu., Results: At a median post-recurrence follow-up of 7.5 years, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after IBTR were 91.4% and 83.0%, respectively. Median time to tumor recurrence (TTR) and IBTR was shorter in the TN phenotype (3.88 vs. 5.00 years; p = 0.09). The TN tumors were not associated with size of local recurrence or recurrence elsewhere in the breast. Despite administration of standard chemotherapy at the time of IBTR, the 5-year DMFS and 5-year OS for the TN cohort were 48.6% and 72.7%, respectively. The 5-year DMFS was 48.6% for TN tumors and 90.8% for non-TN tumors (p < 0.01). By univariate analysis, significant factors associated with poor 5-year DMFS and OS after IBTR included: TN phenotype (p < 0.01), TTR 3 years or less (p < 0.01), local recurrence at or near the original tumor site (p = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, TN was a significant independent predictor of poorer 5-year DMFS (relative risk, 5.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.83-19.01; p < 0.01) after IBTR., Conclusions: Although patients experiencing an IBTR have a relatively favorable prognosis, those with IBTR events of the TN phenotype had a rather poor prognosis despite receiving standard chemotherapy. Strategies with novel systemic therapies to improve outcomes in patients experiencing IBTR of the TN phenotype are warranted.

Purpose: Basal-like carcinoma of the breast is associated with genetic instability and aggressive behavior. In this study, we evaluated the luminal cytokeratin marker CK-19 in young women with breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CS+RT)., Methods: Primary tumor specimens from a cohort of 158 young premenopausal women (range, 25-49 years) treated with CS+RT with a median follow-up of 6.25 years were constructed into a tissue microarray. The array was stained for ER, PR, HER2, CK19, and p53. The molecular profiles were correlated with clinical-pathologic factors, overall, local, and distant relapse-free survival. The association between CK19, other co-variables, and outcome was assessed in a multivariate model., Results: Positive expression of ER, PR, HER-2/neu, CK19, and p53 were 33.1%, 34.5%, 10.0%, 79.5%, and 20.9%, respectively. With 20 local relapses and 38 distant metastases, the 10-year overall, breast relapse-free, and distant relapse-free survival were 79.65%, 87.29%, and 67.35%, respectively. Tumor stage and nodal status were associated with distant relapse-free and overall survival. In multivariate analysis, CK19 negativity was a predictor poor local (RR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.87-7.65; p < 0.01) distant (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.86-2.70; p = 0.17), and overall survival (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.04-3.55; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Lack of CK19 expression identifies a subset of patients with a significantly higher risk of local relapse. Distant relapse and overall survival rates also correlated with CK19 negativity. Further evaluation of the prognostic significance of basal and luminal cytokeratins in young women with breast cancer is warranted.

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels in a large cohort of patients with T1-T2 N0 laryngeal cancer treated with primary radiation therapy (XRT)., Methods: Primary tumor specimens from a cohort of 123 patients with T1-T2 N0 laryngeal cancer treated with XRT between 1975 and 2000 were constructed into a tissue microarray. Clinical prognostic factors included age, sex, T classification, and tumor subsite. Molecular prognostic factors included vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and p53 expression, determined by using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. The association between vascular endothelial growth factor status, covariables, and outcome was assessed., Results: With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, 32 (26%) were diagnosed with local relapse (5-year local relapse-free rate, 70.4%). T2 tumor stage (31.7%) was a significant predictor of local relapse (relative risk [RR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-2.43; P<.05). Positive expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and p53 were: 8.5%, 58.7%, and 36.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, vascular endothelial growth factor positivity was a significant predictor of overall survival (RR = 1.62; 95% CI, 0.99-2.42; P = .05). In multivariate analysis, positive vascular endothelial growth factor status maintained significant correlation with overall survival (RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.49-4.95; P = .002)., Conclusions: Vascular endothelial growth factor positivity appeared to be a significant predictor of overall survival in a multivariate model. Further evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor-positive laryngeal cancers treated with primary XRT is warranted., ((c) 2007 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) is a protein of pregnancy associated with a decrease in lifetime risk of breast cancer in parous women. A synthetic, cyclic nonapeptide has been developed that mimics the antioncogenic active site of AFP. To test the hypothesis that the AFP-derived peptide (AFPep) can prevent breast cancer, the N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced breast cancer model was used in rats., Experimental Design: AFPep was given daily by injection beginning 10 days after N-methyl-N-nitrosourea treatment and continued for 23 days (a time designed to mimic pregnancy) or for other times to assess efficacy as a function of drug duration. Tumor incidence, multiplicity, and latency were noted as end points. At necropsy, pathology analysis of tumors and major organs were obtained., Results: AFPep prevented cancer in a dose-dependent fashion. Significantly longer mean tumor-free days (P < 0.02), lower tumor incidence (P = 0.004), and lower tumor multiplicity were observed for AFPep-treated groups. No evidence of host toxicity as measured by body weight, cage activity, fur texture, and organ weights (liver, uterus, heart, kidney, and spleen) were found in animals treated with AFPep. Mechanistic studies using transplantable human breast cancer xenografts showed that the peptide interfered with estrogen-dependent breast cancer growth inhibited the phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor and activated phosphorylation of p53., Conclusions: AFPep is a well-tolerated, mechanistically novel, chemopreventive agent in models of breast cancer and warrants further development for the prevention and treatment of this disease in humans.