Search

Background: RET fusions are driver alterations in cancer and are most commonly found in non-small cell lung cancer and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. However, RET fusion have been reported in other solid tumors., Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of RET+ solid malignancies identified by targeted RNA sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing of clinical tumor samples performed at Caris Life Science (Phoenix, AZ)., Results: As of March 22, 2022, a total of 378 RET+ solid malignancies were identified in 15 different tumor types and carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) that underwent next-generation RNA sequencing. RET+ NSCLC and RET+ thyroid cancer constituted 66.9% and 11.1% of the RET+ solid malignancies, respectively. RET+ colorectal adenocarcinoma and RET+ breast adenocarcinoma constituted 10.1% and 2.6%, respectively. The estimated frequency of RET fusions within specific tumor types were NSCLC 0.7%, thyroid cancer 3.1%, colorectal cancer 0.2% and breast cancer 0.1%. KIF5B (46.8%) was the most common fusion partner followed by CCDC6 (28.3%) and NCOA4 (13.8%) in RET+ solid tumors. KIF5B-RET was the dominant fusion variant in RET+ NSCLC, NCOA4-RET was the dominant variant in RET+ colorectal carcinoma, and CCDC6-RET was the dominant variant in thyroid cancer. The most common single gene alterations in RET+ tumors were TP53 (34.8%), RASA1 (14.3%) and ARIAD1A (11.6%). RET+ CRC had a high median TMB of 20.0 and were commonly MSI-H., Conclusions: RET fusions were identified in multiple tumor types. With a higher median TMB and commonly MSI-H, RET fusion positive CRC may be a unique molecular subset of CRC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest There was no funding allocated for this research and there are no direct conflicts of interest. Potential COI from all authors are listed below. MN is on the advisory board for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Novartis, EMD Serono, Janssen, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer and Genentech; consultant for Caris Life Sciences (virtual tumor board); speaker for Blueprint Medicines, Janssen, Mirati and Takeda; and reports travel support from AnHeart Therapeutics.  DB has no disclosures. YB, JX, JJS and DS are employees and shareholders of Caris Life Sciences. MNA discloses the following: Speaker Bureau: IPSEN, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health. External advisory board: CTI-Facts (CRO company). CK served as a consultant for Novartis, Janssen, Astrazeneca, Sanofi, PierianDx, Diffuse pharmaceuticals, Mirati, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Arcus Biosciences, and received research funding (to institution) from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Genentech, Janssen, Regeneron, Debiopharm, Karyopharm, and Blueprint Medicines. JN discloses the following: Consulting: Aadi Biosciences, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fujirebio, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Mindmed, Naveris, Takeda, Western Oncolytics., Research Support: Genentech, Merck, Intellectual Property: Cansera and Ownership Interests: Cansera, Epic Sciences, Indee Bio, Quantgene. WMK has stock ownership of Caris Life Sciences. MS has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Roche, Celgene, BMS, Genentech, Novartis and Lilly. MS is a consultant for Genentech and Novartis and has received research support from AstraZeneca, Roche and Takeda. LER has received research support from BMS, Astra-Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Merck, Velos, Guardant Health, Natera, Genentech, Bio Alta. BH has grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Merck, BMS, Advaxis, Amgen, AbbVie, Daiichi, Pfizer, GSK, Beigene, Janssen, has received consulting fees from Veracyte and has been on monitoring or advisory boards for Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Apollomics, Janssen, Takeda, Merck, BMS, Genentech, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, TPT, Arcus and Merus. SHIO has stock ownership and was on the scientific advisory board of Turning Point Therapeutics Inc (until Feb 28, 2019), is a member of the SAB of Elevation Oncology, and has received speaker honorarium from Merck, Roche/Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Takeda/ARIAD and Pfizer; has received advisory fees from Roche/Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Takeda/ARIAD, Pfizer, Foundation Medicine Inc, Spectrum, Daiichi Sankyo, Jassen/JNJ, and X-Covery., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often develop resistance to current standard third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); no targeted treatments are approved in the osimertinib-relapsed setting. In this open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1 trial, the potential for improved anti-tumor activity by combining amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, with lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR TKI, was evaluated in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC whose disease progressed on third-generation TKI monotherapy but were chemotherapy naive (CHRYSALIS cohort E). In the dose-escalation phase, the recommended phase 2 combination dose was established; in the dose-expansion phase, the primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate, and key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. The safety profile of amivantamab and lazertinib was generally consistent with previous experience of each agent alone, with 4% experiencing grade ≥3 events; no new safety signals were identified. In an exploratory cohort of 45 patients who were enrolled without biomarker selection, the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval, 22-51). The median duration of response was 9.6 months, and the median progression-free survival was 4.9 months. Next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analyses identified high EGFR and/or MET expression as potential predictive biomarkers of response, which will need to be validated with prospective assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02609776 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study describes treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions ( EGFRex20ins ) in the United States., Methods: The Flatiron Health electronic health record database was used to select three cohorts among patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins (January 1, 2011-February 29, 2020): (1) first-line (1L) or patients receiving 1L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins ; (2) second or later-line (≥2L) or patients receiving ≥2L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins ; and (3) ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned, or ≥2L patients previously treated with platinum chemotherapy whose baseline characteristics aligned with key eligibility criteria (initiating new treatment after documented EGFRex20ins and ≥1 previous treatment excluding mobocertinib or amivantamab) of the mobocertinib trial NCT02716116. Real-world end points were confirmed overall response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival., Results: Of 237 patients with EGFRex20ins -mutated NSCLC, 129 and 114 patients were included in the 1L and ≥2L cohorts, respectively. In 1L patients, platinum chemotherapy plus nonplatinum chemotherapy (31.0%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (28.7%) were the most common regimens. In ≥2L patients, immuno-oncology monotherapy (28.1%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (17.5%) were the most common index treatments. For any 1L, ≥2L, and ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 18.6%, 9.6%, and 14.0%, respectively; the median overall survival was 17.0, 13.6, and 11.5 months; the median progression-free survival was 5.2, 3.7, and 3.3 months, respectively., Conclusions: The outcomes for patients with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins were poor. This real-world study provides a benchmark on treatment outcomes in this patient population and highlights the unmet need for improved therapeutic options., (© 2023 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.)

Purpose: Non-invasive monitoring of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to be a readily available measure for early prediction of clinical response. Here, we report on early ctDNA changes of KRAS G12C in a Phase 2 trial of adagrasib in patients with advanced, KRAS G12C-mutant lung cancer., Experimental Design: We performed serial droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and plasma NGS on 60 KRAS G12C-mutant patients with lung cancer that participated in cohort A of the KRYSTAL-1 clinical trial. We analyzed the change in ctDNA at 2 specific intervals: Between cycles 1 and 2 and at cycle 4. Changes in ctDNA were compared with clinical and radiographic response., Results: We found that, in general, a maximal response in KRAS G12C ctDNA levels could be observed during the initial approximately 3-week treatment period, well before the first scan at approximately 6 weeks. 35 patients (89.7%) exhibited a decrease in KRAS G12C cfDNA >90% and 33 patients (84.6%) achieved complete clearance by cycle 2. Patients with complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 2 showed an improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with patients with incomplete ctDNA clearance (60.6% vs. 33.3%). Furthermore, complete ctDNA clearance at cycle 4 was associated with an improved overall survival (14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.3)., Conclusions: These results support using early plasma response of KRAS G12C assessed at approximately 3 weeks to anticipate the likelihood of a favorable objective clinical response., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Alectinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated superior progression-free survival over crizotinib with both 300 mg twice daily (J-ALEX) or 600 mg twice daily (ALEX, ALESIA) dosing in three pivotal clinical trials. Given the similar median PFS achieved in the J-ALEX trial and the Asian subgroup of the ALEX trial, there remains debate about the optimal alectinib dose for Asians. The third pivotal alectinib trial, ALESIA, which was conducted exclusively in Asia to support the registration of alectinib in China, utilized 600 mg alectinib twice daily. The mature PFS was not reached at the initial publication of ALESIA. At ESMO Asia 2022, the 5-year update of ALESIA was presented with an impressive mature investigator-assessed PFS of 41.6 months (95% CI 33.1-58.9), which is numerically longer than the mature PFS of 34.1 months achieved by alectinib at 300 mg twice daily in the J-ALEX trial. Based on these results, as well as retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data, Alectinib at 600 mg twice daily is the optimal dose for Asians. This has been based on the ALESIA trial and on the retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data and has set the benchmark for ALK TKI as the first-line treatment for advanced ALK+ NSCLC in Asia. Importantly, lorlatinib, another next generation ALK TKI, also achieved an impressive hazard ratio with a still immature PFS in all patients, including Asian patients, in a recent subgroup analysis after a median follow-up time of 36.7 months. We await the final mature PFS of lorlatinib overall and for Asian patients in the CROWN trial to see if lorlatinib will set a new standard., Competing Interests: Dr Saihong Ignatius Ou reports personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from JNJ/Janssen, personal fees from DAVA Oncology LLP, personal fees from Lilly, personal fees, stock holder of Elevation Oncology, stock holder of Turning Point Therapeutics, personal fees from BeiGene, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Lee and Ou.)

Six ALK TKIs (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, ensartinib) have received first-line treatment indication of advanced ALK+ NSCLC in various countries. In Ba/F3 cells, lorlatinib achieved lowest IC 50 among these 6 ALK TKIs against EML4-ALK variant 1 or 3. In 2022, 7 abstracts reported updated efficacy and safety data from CROWN. With a median follow-up time of 36.7 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 63.5% for lorlatinib-treated patients and the median PFS of lorlatinib still has not been reached. Importantly, post-lorlatinib treatment median PFS2 was 74.0% at 3-years. Lorlatinib-treated Asian patients achieved similar 3-year PFS rate as overall lorlatinib-treated patients. Median PFS was 33.3 months among lorlatinib-treated EML4-ALK v3 patients. CNS AE occurred fewer than 1 event per patient over the median follow-up time of 36.7 months and most resolved without intervention. Altogether these data affirm our belief that lorlatinib should be the treatment of choice of advanced ALK+ NSCLC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest SHIO: Stock ownership (Turning Point Therapeutics [prior to August 17, 2022], Elevation Oncology [Prior to September 30, 2022]); Scientific Advisory Board membership: (Elevation Oncology); Consulting honorarium (JNJ/Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, BeiGene, Lilly, Merus, Pfizer, Elevation Oncology); Speaker honorarium (Pfizer, JNJ/Janssen, DAVA Oncology LLP, Caris Life Science). ATML: Nothing to declare. MN: Consulting fees from Caris Life Sciences, honoraria (advisory boards) from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Genentech, Mirati, honoraria (speakers’ bureau) from Takeda, Janssen, Blueprint Medicine and travel support from AnHeart Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Treatment with lorlatinib for patients with advanced ALK - and ROS1 -rearranged NSCLC ( ALK + and ROS1 + NSCLC) is associated with a unique set of adverse events (AEs) often requiring dose reduction. However, the impact of dose reductions on outcomes remains unclear and is mainly limited to analyses from prospective studies of lorlatinib in the first-line setting., Methods: We reviewed the course of 144 patients with advanced ALK - or ROS1 -rearranged NSCLC treated with lorlatinib in the second-line or later setting to assess the frequency of dose reductions resulting from treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and the association between dose reductions and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 58 patients (40%) had TRAE-related dose reductions, most (59%) owing to neurocognitive AEs or neuropathy. Among all patients, the median PFS was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4-11.8); the median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 16.3-30.5). Among patients who were started on lorlatinib 100 mg/d (n = 122), a Cox regression model with the occurrence of a dose reduction as a time-dependent covariate indicated no association between dose reduction and PFS (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.54-1.39) or OS (hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.47-1.30)., Conclusions: Lorlatinib dose reductions were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes in this multicenter analysis. Prompt identification of lorlatinib TRAEs and implementation of dose reductions may help maximize tolerability without compromising outcomes., (© 2023 The Authors.)

The competing roles of various next-generation ALK TKIs in the first and second line treatment setting of advanced ALK+ NSCLC were based on many phase 3 clinical trials in both the first-line and crizotinib-refractory settings. The approval of all next-generation ALK TKIs was first in the crizotinib-refractory setting, based on a large-scale Phase 2 trial, and was then followed by at least one global randomized phase 3 trial comparing to platinum-based chemotherapy (ASCEND-4) or to crizotinib (ALEX, ALTA-1L, eXalt3, CROWN). In addition, three randomized phase 3 trials in the crizotinib-refractory setting were also conducted by next-generation ALK TKIs that were developed earlier before the superiority of next-generation ALK TKIs was demonstrated in order to secure the approval of these ALK TKIs in the crizotinib-refractory setting. These three crizotinib-refractory randomized trials were: ASCEND-5 (ceritinib), ALUR (alectinib), and ALTA-3 (brigatinib). The outcome of the ATLA-3 trial was recently presented closing out the chapter where next-generation ALK TKIs were investigated in the crizotinib-refractory setting as they have replaced crizotinib as the standard of care first-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. This editorial summarizes the results of next-generation ALK TKIs in randomized crizotinib-refractory trials and provides a perspective on how natural history of ALK+ NSCLC may potentially be altered with sequential treatment. ALTA-3 compared brigatinib to alectinib, showing that both achieved near identical blinded independent review committee (BIRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (19.2-19.3 months). Importantly, 4.8% of brigatinib-treated patients developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) while no alectinib-treated patients developed ILD. Dose reduction and discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events were 21% and 5%, respectively, for brigatinib-treated patients compared to 11% and 2%, respectively, for alectinib-treated patients. Upon analysis of these findings, we speculate that brigatinib may have a diminishing role in the treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC., Competing Interests: Professor Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou reports personal fees from Pfizer, AnHeart Therapeutics, JNJ/Janssen, DAVA Oncology LLP; stock ownership from Elevation Oncology and Turning Point Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Lee and Ou.)

Introduction: Lung cancer in never-smokers is the major cancer cause of death globally. We compared the efficacy of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening among never-smokers versus ever-smokers using systematic review and meta-analysis., Methods: LDCT lung cancer screening studies that simultaneously included both ever-smoker and never-smoker participants published by April 30, 2021, were searched through PubMed and Scopus. Primary outcome measure was relative risk (RR) of lung cancer diagnosed among never-smokers versus ever-smokers., Results: A total of 14 studies (13 from Asia) were included (141,396 ever-smokers, 109,251 never-smokers, 1961 lung cancer cases diagnosed). RR of lung cancer diagnosed between ever-smokers versus never-smokers overall was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.65), 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08-1.75) among males, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.59-1.31) among females. RR was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.41-2.24) and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.89-1.68) for Asian female never-smokers versus male never-smokers and versus male ever-smokers, respectively, and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.65-1.50) versus high-risk ever-smokers (≥30 pack-years). Proportional meta-analysis revealed significantly more lung cancers diagnosed at first scan (95.4% [95% CI: 84.9-100.0] versus 70.9% [95% CI: 54.6-84.9], p = 0.010) and at stage 1 (88.5% [95% CI: 79.3-95.4] versus 79.7% [95% CI: 71.1-87.4], p = 0.071) among never-smokers versus ever-smokers, respectively. RR of lung cancer death and 5-year all-cause mortality in never-smokers versus ever-smokers was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.1-0.55, p < 0.001) and 0.13 (95% CI: 0.05-0.33, p < 0.001), respectively., Conclusions: The RR of lung cancer detected by LDCT screening among female never-smokers and male ever-smokers in Asia was statistically similar. Overall and lung cancer specific mortality from the lung cancer diagnosed from LDCT screening was significantly reduced among never-smokers compared to ever-smokers., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations represent 5% to 10% of EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Identifying patients with EGFR ex20ins is challenging owing to the limited coverage of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and the relatively recent use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). This study analyzes the spectrum of EGFR ex20ins variants in a large patient population from a global clinical trial and several real-world cohorts and the ability of PCR kits to identify these alterations., Methods: We conducted this retrospective analysis in patients with NSCLC who underwent NGS or other sequencing testing and had a known EGFR ex20ins mutation. Patients were gathered from a clinical trial (NCT02716116), a chart review study in Germany, and the LC-SCRUM-Japan, GENIE, and U.S. COTA databases. Proportions of patients with ex20ins variants that could have been detected by six commercially available and widely used PCR kits were calculated in each data set., Results: Overall, 636 patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations were included in this analysis and 104 unique EGFR ex20ins variants were identified across the data sources. The proportion of patients whose ex20ins could have been detected by any PCR test alone ranged from 11.8% to 58.9% across the data sources., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the PCR tests evaluated would have missed more than 40% of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. NGS-based genetic testing is preferable than standard PCR assays and can substantially improve the identification of the diverse profile of EGFR ex20ins variants in NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Mobocertinib is a novel, first-in-class, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) designed to selectively target in-frame EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins). Comparative effectiveness data for mobocertinib versus real-world treatments are lacking in this rare population. This study compared data for mobocertinib reported in a Phase I/II single-arm clinical trial with an external control group consisting of patients who received available treatment in the real-world setting in the United States (US)., Materials and Methods: The mobocertinib group included platinum-pretreated patients with advanced EGFR ex20ins non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving mobocertinib 160 mg QD in an ongoing, single-arm, phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT02716116; n = 114). The real-world data (RWD) group included platinum-pretreated patients with advanced EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC from the Flatiron Health database (n = 50). Inverse probability treatment weighting based on the propensity score method controlled for potential confounding between groups. Confirmed overall response rate (cORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups., Results: After weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced. Patients in the RWD group received EGFR TKI (20 %), immuno-oncology therapy (40 %), or any regimens containing chemotherapy (40 %) in the second- or later-line setting. In the mobocertinib and RWD groups, respectively, cORR was 35.1 % and 11.9 % (odds ratio: 3.75 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 2.05, 6.89]); median PFS was 7.3 and 3.3 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57 [95 % CI: 0.36, 0.90]); and median OS was 24.0 and 12.4 months (HR: 0.53 [95 % CI: 0.33, 0.83]) after weighting., Discussion: Mobocertinib showed substantially improved outcomes versus an external control group using available therapies in platinum-pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins-mutant NSCLC. In the absence of comparative evidence from randomized trials, these findings help elucidate potential benefits of mobocertinib in this rare population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Mobocertinib, a novel oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is available for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations after platinum chemotherapy. We performed an indirect comparison of clinical trial data and real-world data (RWD) to determine the relative efficacy of mobocertinib vs. other treatments for these patients., Materials and Methods: Data on the efficacy of mobocertinib from a phase I/II trial (NCT02716116) were compared to RWD from a retrospective study in 12 German centers using inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, smoking status, presence of brain metastasis, time from advanced diagnosis, and histology. Tumor response assessment was based on RECIST v1.1., Results: The analysis included 114 patients in the mobocertinib group and 43 in the RWD group. The confirmed overall response rate (cORR) according to investigator assessment was 0% for standard treatments and 35.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.4-44.6) for mobocertinib (p < 0.0001). Compared to standard regimens in the weighted population, mobocertinib prolonged overall survival (OS, median [95% CI] = 9.8 [4.3-13.7] vs. 20.2 [14.9-25.3] months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42 [0.25-0.69], p = 0.0035), progression-free survival (PFS, median [95% CI] = 2.6 [1.5-5.7] vs. 7.3 [5.6-8.8] months; HR = 0.28 [0.18-0.44], p < 0.0001), and time to treatment discontinuation (median [95% CI] = 2.1 [1.2-3.1] vs. 7.4 [6.4-8.5] months; HR = 0.34 [0.18-0.65], p = 0.0004)., Conclusion: Mobocertinib was associated with an improved cORR and prolonged PFS and OS compared to standard treatments for patients with EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: PC: research funding from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda, speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and personal fees for participating to advisory boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Pfizer and Roche. TP: employee of Evidera/PPD; ownership of stocks from PPD and Thermo Fisher. JLH: employee of Takeda. HML: employee of Takeda. LH: employee of Takeda. SJ: employee of Takeda. MTa: employee of Evidera/PPD; ownership of stocks from PPD and Thermo Fisher. IP: employee of Evidera/PPD; ownership of stocks from PPD and Thermo Fisher. JL: employee of Takeda. PZ: employee of Takeda. JDP: research funding from BMS, consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Takeda. SHO: research funding from Takeda; speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Takeda/ARIAD, Roche/Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo, and Janssen/JNJ; ownership of stocks from Turning Point Therapeutics and Elevation Oncology. MT: research funding from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, and Takeda; speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen Oncology, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda. AS: research funding from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, and Incyte; speaker’s honoraria from Aignostics, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Qlucore, Roche, Seagen, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Gene fusions involving receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) define an important class of genomic alterations with many successful targeted therapies now approved for ALK , ROS1 , RET and NTRK gene fusions. Fusions involving the ERBB family of RTKs have been sporadically reported, but their frequency has not yet been comprehensively analyzed and functional characterization is lacking on many types of ERBB fusions., Materials and Methods: We analyzed tumor samples submitted to Caris Life Sciences (n=64,354), as well as the TCGA (n=10,967), MSK IMPACT (n=10,945) and AACR GENIE (n=96,324) databases for evidence of EGFR, ERBB2 and ERBB4 gene fusions. We also expressed several novel fusions in cancer cell lines and analyzed their response to EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)., Results: In total, we identified 1,251 ERBB family fusions, representing an incidence of approximately 0.7% across all cancer types. EGFR, ERBB2 , and ERBB4 fusions were most frequently found in glioblastoma, breast cancer and ovarian cancer, respectively. We modeled two novel types of EGFR and ERBB2 fusions, one with a tethered kinase domain and the other with a tethered adapter protein. Specifically, we expressed EGFR-ERBB4, EGFR-SHC1, ERBB2-GRB7 and ERBB2-SHC1 , in cancer cell lines and demonstrated that they are oncogenic, regulate downstream signaling and are sensitive to small molecule inhibition with EGFR and HER2 TKIs., Conclusions: We found that ERBB fusions are recurrent mutations that occur across multiple cancer types. We also establish that adapter-tethered and kinase-tethered fusions are oncogenic and can be inhibited with EGFR or HER2 inhibitors. We further propose a nomenclature system to categorize these fusions into several functional classes., Competing Interests: RD is currently employed by Rain Oncology and shareholder in Rain Oncology. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Schubert, Elliott, Le, Estrada-Bernal, Doebele, Lou, Borghaei, Demeure, Kurzrock, Reuss, Ou, Braxton, Thomas, Darabi, Korn, El-Deiry and Liu.)

Per the US FDA sotorasib approval summary, KRAS G12C mutation is found in approximately 14% of adenocarcinoma of the lung, primarily in patients with a history of smoking. Until recently, targeted therapies against KRAS G12C have been largely unsuccessful due to the small protein size of KRAS and thus lack of binding pockets in KRAS and rapid hydrolysis of GTP to GDP by KRAS enzymes from abundance of GTP in the cytoplasm. Sotorasib, a first-in-class covalent KRAS G12C inhibitor that binds to the switch pocket II in the KRAS G12C -GDP "off" state, received US FDA accelerated approval on May 21, 2021 in the US, based on a Phase II dose expansion cohort of CodeBreaK 100 trial. Sotorasib at 960 mg once daily achieved an ORR of 36% (95% CI: 28%, 45%), with a median response duration of 10 months (range 1.3+, 11.1) in 124 KRAS G12C + NSCLC. At the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2022 annual meeting, sotorasib achieved a statistically significant improved PFS over docetaxel (HR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0. 51-0.86; P = 0.002). The modest magnitude of PFS improvement of 1.1 months (from 4.5 months to 5.6 months) and the ORR of 28% led to a vigorous debate on whether sotorasib was indeed a true breakthrough. In this pros and cons debate, we argue thatsotorasib has achieved a true breakthrough., Competing Interests: Dr Saihong Ignatius Ou reports personal fees from Pfizer, membership of Scientific Advisory Board, stock ownership from Elevation Oncology, personal fees from DAVA Oncology LLP, personal fees from JNJ/Jassen, personal fees from BeiGene, personal fees from Lilly, stock ownership from Turning Point Therapeutics, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Brazel et al.)

Significance: The combined preclinical features of NVL-520 that include potent targeting of ROS1 and diverse ROS1 resistance mutations, high selectivity for ROS1 G2032R over TRK, and brain penetration mark the development of a distinct ROS1 TKI with the potential to surpass the limitations of earlier-generation TKIs for ROS1 fusion-positive patients. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 517., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) account for ≤ 12% of all EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancers. We analysed real-world datasets to determine the frequency of ex20ins variants, and the ability of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify them. Three real-world United States NGS databases were used: GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM. Mutation profiles consistent with in-frame EGFR ex20ins were summarized. GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM datasets identified 180, 627, and 627 patients with EGFR ex20ins respectively. The most frequent insertion region of exon 20 was the near loop (~ 70%), followed by the far loop (~ 30%) and the helical (~ 3-6%) regions. GENIE, FoundationInsights, and GuardantINFORM datasets identified 41, 102, and 96 unique variants respectively. An analysis of variants projected that ~ 50% of EGFR ex20ins identified by NGS would have been missed by PCR-based assays. Given the breadth of EGFR ex20ins identified in the real-world US datasets, the ability of PCR to identify these mutations is limited. NGS platforms are more appropriate to identify patients likely to benefit from EGFR ex20ins-targeted therapies., (© 2022 Janssen Global Services, LLC. Molecular Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Federation of European Biochemical Societies.)

Introduction: Oral administration of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid) was found to be promising in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019. The active antiviral component nirmatrelvir in Paxlovid is co-formulated with ritonavir, a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor. Many oral targeted therapies indicated for lung cancer are known substrates of CYP 3A4, and concurrent use with Paxlovid may lead to potential drug-drug interaction (DDI). The purpose of this review is to evaluate the potential DDI between targeted therapies and supportive care for lung cancer and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir., Methods: Drug database search in PubMed and the Food and Drug Administration was conducted to identify pharmacokinetic data on oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in NSCLC, both Food and Drug Administration approved and those in development. Metabolism pathways for various TKIs are extracted, and the impact of TKI area under the curves and maximum concentration by strong CYP 3A4 inducers and inhibitors is summarized. The most common toxicities and supportive care medications for the TKI were identified., Results: Among EGFR and exon 20 insertion inhibitors, afatinib is least likely to be affected by CYP 3A4, followed by dacomitinib and osimertinib. Among ALK inhibitors, alectinib is the least susceptible to CYP 3A4. ROS1 inhibitors are affected by CYP 3A4 inhibition with the exception of crizotinib. Among MET inhibitors, capmatinib is substantially affected by CYP 3A4 inhibition. Drug exposure of RET inhibitors is expected to increase with CYP 3A4 inhibition, with selpercatinib being the least affected. Certain supportive care medications for lung cancer TKI may have relevant DDIs., Conclusions: The clinical impact of the DDI between lung cancer TKI and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir varies largely on the basis of the susceptibility of CYP 3A4 inhibition caused by the antiviral. Close monitoring and medication adjustments (i.e., dose changes or alternative coronavirus disease 2019 therapy) can be used to overcome DDI to ensure patient safety., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Adagrasib, an oral small-molecule inhibitor of mutant KRAS G12C protein, has shown clinical activity in pretreated patients with several tumor types, including colorectal cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that combining a KRAS G12C inhibitor with an epidermal growth factor receptor antibody could be an effective clinical strategy., Methods: In this phase 1-2, open-label, nonrandomized clinical trial, we assigned heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C to receive adagrasib monotherapy (600 mg orally twice daily) or adagrasib (at the same dose) in combination with intravenous cetuximab once a week (with an initial loading dose of 400 mg per square meter of body-surface area, followed by a dose of 250 mg per square meter) or every 2 weeks (with a dose of 500 mg per square meter). The primary end points were objective response (complete or partial response) and safety., Results: As of June 16, 2022, a total of 44 patients had received adagrasib, and 32 had received combination therapy with adagrasib and cetuximab, with a median follow-up of 20.1 months and 17.5 months, respectively. In the monotherapy group (43 evaluable patients), a response was reported in 19% of the patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 8 to 33). The median response duration was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.3 to 8.3), and the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 8.3). In the combination-therapy group (28 evaluable patients), the response was 46% (95% CI, 28 to 66). The median response duration was 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.7 to not estimable), and the median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.1). The percentage of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 34% in the monotherapy group and 16% in the combination-therapy group. No grade 5 adverse events were observed., Conclusions: Adagrasib had antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with mutant KRAS G12C, both as oral monotherapy and in combination with cetuximab. The median response duration was more than 6 months in the combination-therapy group. Reversible adverse events were common in the two groups. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; KRYSTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Crizotinib and entrectinib have been approved to treat ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1 + ) non-small-cell lung cancer. However, unmet needs remain, including treatment of patients with resistance mutations, efficacy in brain metastasis and avoidance of neurological side effects. Taletrectinib was designed to: improve efficacy; overcome resistance to first-generation ROS1 inhibitors; and address brain metastasis while conferring fewer neurological adverse events. All of these features are demonstrated and supported by the interim data from the regional phase II TRUST-I clinical study. Here we describe the rationale and design of TRUST-II, a global phase II study of taletrectinib in patients with locally advanced/metastatic ROS1 + non-small-cell lung cancer and other ROS1 + solid tumors. The primary end point is confirmed objective response rate. Secondary end points include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. This trial is enrolling patients in North America, Europe and Asia.

Recent clinical development of KRAS inhibitors has heightened interest in the genomic landscape of KRAS-altered cancers. We performed a pan-cancer analysis of KRAS-altered samples from 426,706 adult patients with solid or hematologic malignancies using comprehensive genomic profiling; additional analyses included 62,369 liquid biopsy and 7241 pediatric samples. 23% of adult pan-cancer samples had KRAS alterations; 88% were mutations, most commonly G12D/G12V/G12C/G13D/G12R, and prevalence was similar in liquid biopsies. Co-alteration landscapes were largely similar across KRAS mutations but distinct from KRAS wild-type, though differences were observed in some tumor types for tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, and other mutational signatures. Prognosis of KRAS-mutant versus other genomic cohorts of lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer were assessed using a real-world clinicogenomic database. As specific KRAS inhibitors and combination therapeutic strategies are being developed, genomic profiling to understand co-alterations and other biomarkers that may modulate response to targeted or immunotherapies will be imperative., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Brigatinib is a potent next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment-naive and crizotinib-refractory advanced ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. We evaluated brigatinib after other next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors., Methods: In this single-arm, phase 2, ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2 (NCT03535740), patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC whose disease progressed on alectinib or ceritinib received brigatinib 180 mg once daily (after 7-d 90-mg lead-in). Primary end point was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was analyzed., Results: Among 103 patients (data cutoff: September 30, 2020; median follow-up [range]: 10.8 [0.5-17.7] mo), confirmed IRC-ORR was 26.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.0-35.8), median duration of response, 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.6-not reached), and median progression-free survival (mPFS), 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.5-5.8). mPFS was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.7) in patients with ctDNA-detectable baseline ALK fusion (n = 64). Among 86 patients who progressed on alectinib, IRC-ORR was 29.1% (95% CI: 19.8-39.9); mPFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 1.9-5.4). Resistance mutations were present in 33.3% (26 of 78) of baseline ctDNA; 54% (14 of 26) of mutations were G1202R; 52% (33 of 64) of patients with detectable ALK fusion had EML4-ALK variant 3. Most common all-grade treatment-related adverse events were increased creatine phosphokinase (32%) and diarrhea (27%). The mean dose intensity of brigatinib (180 mg once daily) was 85.9%., Conclusions: In ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2, brigatinib was found to have a limited activity in patients with ALK+ NSCLC post-ceritinib or post-alectinib therapy. mPFS was longer with brigatinib in patients without baseline detectable plasma ALK fusion., (Copyright © 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) has not been closely examined due to the frequent exclusion of patients with EGFR mutations from large immunotherapy-based NSCLC trials., Patients and Methods: A real-world, retrospective study was conducted to compare outcomes of ICI-treated patients with EGFR ex20ins and wildtype NSCLC (wt-NSCLC; defined as EGFR and ALK test negative). Patients with advanced NSCLC from the Flatiron Health database (2015-2020) were included in the analysis. Real-world time to next therapy (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS), stratified by ICI initiation line of therapy, were the prespecified primary and secondary endpoints, respectively., Results: Among 59 patients with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC and 5365 with wt-NSCLC, ICI treatment was received as first-line therapy in 25% and 39%, respectively. Patients with EGFR ex20ins had a 58% increased risk of shorter time to next-line therapy compared with wt-NSCLC (adjusted hazard ratio of 1.58 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.1]; P = .0012). The median rwTTNT for first ICI line was 3.7 months (95% CI, 3.0-4.9) for EGFR ex20ins NSCLC compared with 5.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-6.0) for wt-NSCLC. No meaningful difference in rwOS between the groups was observed., Conclusions: ICI therapy may be less effective for patients with EGFR ex20ins compared with wt-NSCLC. Consistent with prior data on exon 19 deletion and L858R substitution, tumors harboring ex20ins appear to be less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition than wt-NSCLC., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Adagrasib (MRTX849) is an oral, highly selective, small-molecule, covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C . We report results from a phase I/IB study of adagrasib in non-small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and other solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C mutation., Materials and Methods: Patients with advanced KRAS G12C -mutant solid tumors were treated with adagrasib 150 mg orally once daily, 300 mg once daily, 600 mg once daily, 1,200 mg once daily, or 600 mg orally twice a day using an accelerated titration design, which transitioned to a modified toxicity probability interval design when a predefined degree of toxicity was observed or target adagrasib exposure was achieved. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity were evaluated., Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of adagrasib. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was 600 mg twice a day on the basis of safety, tolerability, and observed pharmacokinetics properties. No maximum tolerated dose was formally defined. After a median follow-up of 19.6 months, eight of 15 patients (53.3%; 95% CI, 26.6 to 78.7) with RECIST-evaluable KRAS G12C -mutant non-small-cell lung cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a confirmed partial response. The median duration of response was 16.4 months (95% CI, 3.1 to not estimable). The median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI, 2.6 to not estimable). One of two patients with KRAS G12C -mutant colorectal cancer treated at 600 mg twice a day achieved a partial response (duration of response, 4.2 months). At the RP2D, the most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were nausea (80.0%), diarrhea (70.0%), vomiting (50.0%), and fatigue (45.0%). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was fatigue (15.0%)., Conclusion: Adagrasib 600 mg twice a day was well tolerated and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring the KRAS G12C mutation., Competing Interests: Sai-Hong Ignatius OuStock and Other Ownership Interests: Turning Point Therapeutics, Elevation OncologyHonoraria: Pfizer, Roche Pharma AG, Genentech/Roche, ARIAD/Takeda, AstraZeneca, BeiGeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Janssen/JNJSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Genentech/RocheResearch Funding: Pfizer (Inst), Roche Pharma AG (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), ARIAD (Inst), Revolution Medicines (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Janssen/JNJ (Inst) Pasi A. JänneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Gatekeeper Pharmaceuticals, Loxo OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Merrimack, Chugai Pharma, Roche/Genentech, LOXO, Mirati Therapeutics, Araxes Pharma, Ignyta, Lilly, Takeda, Novartis, Biocartis, Voronoi, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Silicon Therapeutics, Nuvalent, Inc, Eisai, Bayer, Syndax, AbbVie, Allorion Therapeutics, Accutar Biotech, TranscentaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Puma Biotechnology, Takeda, Revolution MedicinesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am a coinventor of a DFCI-owned patent on EGFR mutations licensed to Lab Corp. I receive postmarketing royalties from this invention Ticiana A. LealConsulting or Advisory Role: Takeda, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Bayer, Genentech, Lilly, Janssen, Mirati Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Novocure Igor I. RybkinConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Joshua K. SabariConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Janssen Oncology, Navire, Pfizer, Regeneron, Medscape, Takeda Minal A. BarveEmployment: Texas OncologyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Texas OncologyResearch Funding: Mary Crowley Research Center Lyudmila BazhenovaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Epic SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Regeneron, Merck, Johnson and Johnson, BMSi, Daichi, NEUVOGEN, Bayer, Sanofi, ORCIC, Turning Point TherapeuticsResearch Funding: BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Melissa L. JohnsonEmployment: HCA HealthcareConsulting or Advisory Role: Otsuka, Genentech/Roche (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Merck (Inst), Loxo (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst), Ribon Therapeutics (Inst), Incyte (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Achilles Therapeutics (Inst), Atreca (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Gritstone Oncology (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), WindMIL (Inst), Checkpoint Therapeutics (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Axelia Oncology (Inst), Black Diamond Therapeutics (Inst), CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), EcoR1 Capital (Inst), Editas Medicine (Inst), Genmab (Inst), IDEAYA Biosciences (Inst), ITeos Therapeutics (Inst), Oncorus (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Turning Point Therapeutics (Inst)Research Funding: EMD Serono (Inst), Kadmon (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Genmab (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Stemcentrx (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Checkpoint Therapeutics (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Merck (Inst), Hengrui Pharmaceutical (Inst), Lycera (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Tarveda Therapeutics (Inst), Loxo (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), CytomX Therapeutics (Inst), Dynavax Technologies (Inst), Corvus Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Genocea Biosciences (Inst), Gritstone Oncology (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), Adaptimmune (Inst), Syndax (Inst), Neovia Oncology (Inst), Acerta Pharma (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Shattuck Labs (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Apexigen (Inst), Atreca (Inst), OncoMed (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Immunocore (Inst), Jounce Therapeutics (Inst), University of Michigan (Inst), WindMIL (Inst), TCR2 Therapeutics (Inst), Arcus Biosciences (Inst), Ribon Therapeutics (Inst), BerGenBio (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Tmunity Therapeutics, Inc (Inst), Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals (Inst), Rubius Therapeutics (Inst), Curis (Inst), Silicon Therapeutics (Inst), Dracen (Inst), PMV Pharma (Inst), Artios (Inst), BioAtla (Inst), Elicio Therapeutics (Inst), Erasca, Inc (Inst), Harpoon (Inst), Helsinn Healthcare (Inst), Hutchison MediPharma (Inst), IDEAYA Biosciences (Inst), IGM Biosciences (Inst), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (Inst), NeoImmuneTech (Inst), Numab (Inst), RasCal (Inst), Relay Therapeutics (Inst), Revolution Medicines (Inst), Tempest Therapeutics (Inst), Tizona Therapeutics, Inc (Inst), Turning Point Therapeutics (Inst), Vyriad (Inst), Y-mAbs Therapeutics (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Incyte, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Karen L. VelasteguiEmployment: Mirati Therapeutics, Arena PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati Therapeutics, Arena Pharma Cornelius CilliersEmployment: Mirati TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati Therapeutics James G. ChristensenEmployment: Mirati TherapeuticsLeadership: Mirati TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: BridgeBio PharmaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Multiple patents in the last 2 years while employed at Mirati Therapeutics covering discovery of KRAS, LSD1, and EZH2 inhibitors (Inst) Xiaohong YanEmployment: Mirati TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati TherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Mirati Therapeutics Richard C. ChaoEmployment: Mirati TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Mirati Therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck Kyriakos P. PapadopoulosConsulting or Advisory Role: Basilea, Turning Point Therapeutics, Bicycle TherapeuticsResearch Funding: AbbVie (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Merck (Inst), Peloton Therapeutics (Inst), ADC Therapeutics (Inst), 3D Medicines (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Syros Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Mersana (Inst), MabSpace Biosciences (Inst), Jounce Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), AnHeart Therapeutics (Inst), F-star (Inst), Linnaeus Therapeutics (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Tempest Therapeutics (Inst), Treadwell Therapeutics (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), BioNTech (Inst), Bicycle Therapeutics (Inst), Kezar Life Sciences (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: Germline CHEK2 mutations are rare and have not been associated with increased risk of NSCLC., Methods: We identified two sequential primary NSCLCs harboring distinct actionable driver alterations (EGFR E746 &#95;S752 delinsV and CD74-ROS1 ) in a patient with NSCLC with a novel germline CHEK2 mutation S5fs∗54 (c.14&#95;20delCGGATGT). We queried a genomic database of NSCLC samples profiled by plasma next-generation sequencing (Foundation Medicine Inc.) and performed a literature search of germline CHEK2 mutations in NSCLC., Results: Of 6101 patients with unique NSCLC profiled by plasma next-generation sequencing, 53 cases (0.87%) of germline CHEK2 mutation were identified (male-to-female ratio, 49%:51%; median age = 75 y). The median allele frequency of CHEK2 was 49% (interquartile range: 49%-51%). Ten unique CHEK2 germline mutations were identified. Literature review identified 15 additional cases of germline CHEK2 mutations in NSCLC. Overall, a total of 70 CHEK2 germline mutations (21 unique CHEK2 alterations) were identified. Among these 70 CHEK2 germline mutations, 54.3% were amino acid substitutions (point mutation), 40.0% were frameshift mutations, and 5.7% were splice site mutations. Of these 70 total cases assessed, 29 (41.4%) potentially actionable driver alterations were identified with KRAS G12C mutation (27.6%) being the most common and KRAS G12A/C/D/R/S/V mutations together constituting 51.7% of these driver mutations., Conclusions: Germline CHEK2 mutations are rare in NSCLC. A large proportion of these cases harbor actionable driver alterations. The relationship between germline CHEK2 mutations and actionable driver alterations in NSCLC may be worth further investigation., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Introduction: EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rare, has a poor prognosis, and outcomes are not fully established. We describe and evaluate outcomes from real-world and clinical evidence in these patients., Methods: A systematic literature review (SLR) identified interventional and real-world evidence (RWE) studies reporting clinical outcomes for EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive NSCLC. Meta-analyses were conducted by line of therapy to synthesize pooled survival and response outcomes across RWE. Published evidence from interventional studies was summarized individually., Results: The SLR identified 23 RWE and 19 original interventional studies. In the meta-analysis of RWE, pooled response and survival outcomes were low for first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immuno-oncology (IO) agents. First-line chemotherapy resulted in a pooled ORR 25.7%, pooled PFS 5.6 months, and pooled OS 18.3 months. Pooled outcomes were further reduced in second or later lines (≥2 L): pooled ORR was 5.0%, 3.3%, and 13.9%; pooled PFS was 2.1 months, 2.3 months, and 4.4 months; and pooled OS was 14.1 months, 8.8 months, and 17.1 months (not a pooled result) for EGFR-TKIs, IO agents, and chemotherapy, respectively. Interventional studies reported outcomes for TKIs (mobocertinib, poziotinib, osimertinib, afatinib, CLN-081, DZD9008), a monoclonal antibody (amivantamab), and a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor (luminespib). While there is limited RWE for the recently approved agents mobocertinib and amivantamab, which specifically target exon 20 insertion mutations, interventional evidence supports their potential as effective treatment options., Conclusions: Conventional treatments used in patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation-positive NSCLC have limited efficacy, though chemotherapy appeared to be associated with better response and survival outcomes than non-exon 20 targeting EGFR-TKIs and IO agents. This supports the need to identify EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations as the availability of new targeted treatments may offer additional therapeutic options to these patients.

Background: Adagrasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, irreversibly and selectively binds KRAS G12C , locking it in its inactive state. Adagrasib showed clinical activity and had an acceptable adverse-event profile in the phase 1-1b part of the KRYSTAL-1 phase 1-2 study., Methods: In a registrational phase 2 cohort, we evaluated adagrasib (600 mg orally twice daily) in patients with KRAS G12C -mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death 1 or programmed death ligand 1 therapy. The primary end point was objective response assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety., Results: As of October 15, 2021, a total of 116 patients with KRAS G12C -mutated NSCLC had been treated (median follow-up, 12.9 months); 98.3% had previously received both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Of 112 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 48 (42.9%) had a confirmed objective response. The median duration of response was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 13.8), and the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI, 4.7 to 8.4). As of January 15, 2022 (median follow-up, 15.6 months), the median overall survival was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 19.2). Among 33 patients with previously treated, stable central nervous system metastases, the intracranial confirmed objective response rate was 33.3% (95% CI, 18.0 to 51.8). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.4% of the patients - grade 1 or 2 in 52.6% and grade 3 or higher in 44.8% (including two grade 5 events) - and resulted in drug discontinuation in 6.9% of patients., Conclusions: In patients with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated NSCLC, adagrasib showed clinical efficacy without new safety signals. (Funded by Mirati Therapeutics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03785249.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Objectives: To analyze the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a phase 1/2 study., Materials and Methods: In this ongoing phase 2 part of the trial, patients with ALK- or ROS1-positive, advanced NSCLC enrolled into six expansion cohorts (EXP1-6), based on ALK and ROS1 status and previous therapy, and received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was objective tumor response and intracranial response. Post hoc analyses of activity were conducted in Asian and non-Asian (based on race) ALK-positive patients who received either previous crizotinib with or without chemotherapy (EXP2-3A) or at least one second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor with any number of chemotherapy regimens (EXP3B-5). Analysis of safety (adverse events [AEs]) was in the phase 1 and 2 study population who started lorlatinib 100 mg once daily., Results: 17 Asian patients were enrolled in EXP2-3A and 53 in EXP3B-5; 33 non-Asian patients were enrolled in EXP2-3A and 73 in EXP3B-5. Objective response rates in the Asian and non-Asian subgroups were 82.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56.6-96.2) and 63.6% (95% CI: 45.1-79.6) in EXP2-3A, and 47.2% (95% CI: 33.3-61.4) and 30.1% (95% CI: 19.9-42.0) in EXP3B-5, and median progression-free survival was 13.6 and 12.5 months (EXP2-3A) and 6.9 and 5.5 months (EXP3B-5). Lorlatinib exhibited antitumor activity across ALK resistance mutations, while no differences according to the EML4-ALK variant could be detected. The most common treatment-related AEs were hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, edema, and peripheral neuropathy in both Asian and non-Asian subgroups., Conclusion: Lorlatinib showed substantial overall and intracranial activity in pretreated patients with ALK-positive NSCLC in both Asian and non-Asian patients. AE profiles were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients., Clinicaltrials: gov NCT01970865., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

TRK fusions are rare but targetable mutations which occur across a wide variety of cancer types. We report the prevalence of approximately 0.7% for NTRK-positive colorectal cancer (CRC) by genetically profiling 2519 colonic and rectal tumors. The aberrations of APC and TP53 frequently co-occurred with NTRK gene fusions, whereas RAS/BRAF oncogenic alterations and NTRK fusions were almost always mutually exclusive. NTRK-driven colorectal cancer patients demonstrated increased TMB (median = 53 mut/MB, 95% CI: 36.8-68.0 mut/MB), high microsatellite instability, and an enrichment for POLE/POLD1 mutations when compared to molecularly unstratified colorectal cancer population. These data shed light on possible future approach of multimodality treatment regimen including TRK-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in NTRK-positive CRCs., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Alectinib is a preferred first-line treatment option for advanced ALK -positive NSCLC. Combination regimens of alectinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated for synergistic effects., Methods: Adults with treatment-naive, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrent ALK -positive NSCLC were enrolled into a two-stage phase 1b study. Patients received alectinib 600 mg (twice daily during cycle 1 and throughout each 21-d cycle thereafter) plus atezolizumab 1200 mg (d8 of cycle 1 and then d1 of each 21-d cycle). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability of alectinib plus atezolizumab. Secondary objectives included assessments of antitumor activity., Results: In total, 21 patients received more than or equal to 1 dose of alectinib or atezolizumab. As no dose-limiting toxicities were observed in stage 1 (n = 7), the starting dose and schedule were continued into stage 2 (n = 14). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (range: 1-39). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57% of the patients, most often rash (19%). No grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events were reported. Confirmed objective response rate was 86% (18 of 21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-97). Median progression-free survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI: 13 mo-NE), neither was median overall survival (95% CI: 33 mo-NE)., Conclusions: The combination of alectinib and atezolizumab is feasible, but increased toxicity was found compared with the individual agents. With small sample sizes and relatively short follow-up, definitive conclusions regarding antitumor activity cannot be made., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T854A is an uncommon exon 21 mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It was first reported in samples collected after first generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment as an acquired resistant mutation to first generation EGFR-TKI. The efficacy of osimertinib, a third generation EGFR-TKI, in these patients was not clear., Methods: In this study, a total of 8932 NSCLC patients with NGS data were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the molecular characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with EGFR T854A mutation., Results: Eight of 8932 patients (0.09%) had EGFR T854A mutation, and 5 of them (62.5%) were treatment-naïve. Interestingly, all EGFR T854A mutations were co-occurred with EGFR L858R mutation in cis. TP53 was the most common concomitant mutation and no other driver mutation was found. Five of the 8 patients received treatment of osimertinib. Four patients achieved partial response, and one had stable disease, resulting in an overall objective response rate of 80% and disease control rate of 100%. The median progression-free survival of patients who received osimertinib was 10 months. Moreover, EGFR C797S mutation was detected in 1 patient after resistant to osimertinib treatment., Conclusion: Presence of EGFR T854A mutation was rare in NSCLC patients and our retrospective study provides clinical evidence that osimertinib may be an effective treatment to improve survival outcomes in patients with EGFR T854A., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the single-arm CHRYSALIS study, amivantamab showed durable responses and manageable safety in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) who progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy. External controls can provide context for interpreting amivantamab efficacy., Methods: External controls were selected from three US-based databases (ConcertAI, COTA, and Flatiron). Key inclusion criteria were diagnosis of EGFR ex20ins advanced NSCLC, prior platinum-based chemotherapy, and performance status score ≤ 1. Duplicate external controls were identified using a tokenization procedure and removed, and adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between amivantamab-treated and external control cohorts was achieved using propensity score weighting., Results: Amivantamab-treated and pooled external control cohorts included 81 and 125 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across cohorts, except more amivantamab-treated patients were Asian (56% vs 13%). Most common therapies received by external controls were non-platinum-based chemotherapy (25.1%), immuno-oncology therapies (24.2%), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (16.3%), and platinum-based chemotherapy (16.3%). Overall response rate was 40% among amivantamab-treated patients and 16% among external controls. Amivantamab-treated patients had longer progression-free survival (median 8.3 vs 2.9 months; hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI]: 0.47 [0.34-0.65]), time to next therapy (median 14.8 vs 4.8 months; HR [95% CI]: 0.40 [0.28-0.57]), and overall survival (median 22.8 vs 12.8 months; HR [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.31-0.77]) than external controls. Results were consistent in sensitivity analyses comparing each external control dataset against the amivantamab-treated group separately., Conclusion: Among post-platinum patients with EGFR ex20ins advanced NSCLC, those treated with amivantamab had improved outcomes, including 10-month longer overall survival, versus external controls., (Copyright © 2022 Janssen Research and Development LLC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We retrospectively assessed prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using data from the phase III ALEX study in treatment-naïve, advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg (n = 152) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 151). cfDNA was quantified from baseline plasma samples, with patients stratified into ≤median and >median cfDNA biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP). Effect of cfDNA concentration on outcomes was analyzed using a Cox regression model with treatment group as covariate, and in multivariate analyses., Results: Median cfDNA concentration in the BEP was 11.53 ng/mL (n = 276). A positive correlation was found between cfDNA concentration and number of lesions, organ lesion sites, and tumor size (sum of longest diameter; all P < 0.0001). In both treatment arms, patients in the >median BEP were more likely to experience disease progression than the ≤median BEP [alectinib adjusted HR = 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-3.89; P = 0.0305 and crizotinib adjusted HR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.11-3.00, P = 0.0169]. Median progression-free survival was longer with alectinib than crizotinib in both ≤median and >median BEPs (P < 0.0001). Overall survival data remain immature; survival probability was lower in the >median versus ≤median BEP in both treatment arms (alectinib HR = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.08-5.88; P = 0.0333 and crizotinib HR = 2.63; 95% CI, 1.27-5.47; P = 0.0096)., Conclusions: These data suggest that plasma cfDNA concentration may have prognostic value in advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Prospectively designed studies are warranted to investigate this finding., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Lorlatinib, a potent, selective third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exhibited overall and intracranial antitumor activity in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC., Methods: Retrospective analyses in the ongoing phase 2 trial (NCT01970865) investigated the clinical benefit of continuing lorlatinib beyond progressive disease (LBPD). Patients with previous crizotinib treatment as the only ALK TKI were group A (n = 28); those with at least one previous second-generation ALK TKIs were group B (n = 74). LBPD was defined as greater than 3 weeks of lorlatinib treatment after investigator-assessed progressive disease. Only patients with the best overall response of complete or partial response or stable disease were included., Results: There were no major differences in baseline characteristics between groups. The median duration of treatment for patients who continued LBPD was 32.4 months (group A) and 16.4 months (group B) versus 12.5 months (group A) and 7.7 months (group B) for patients who did not continue LBPD. The median overall survival in group A was not reached (NR) in patients who continued LBPD versus 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.1-NR); group B's median was 26.5 months (95% CI: 18.7-35.5) in patients who continued LBPD versus 14.7 months (95% CI: 9.3-38.5) in patients who did not continue LBPD. The median overall survival postprogression for groups A and B was NR (95% CI: 21.4-NR) and 14.6 months (95% CI: 11.2-19.2) in patients who continued LBPD and 8.0 months (95% CI: 1.5-NR) versus 5.3 months (95% CI: 2.8-14.3) in patients who did not continue LBPD., Conclusions: Continuing LBPD is a viable treatment strategy for select patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on lorlatinib., (Copyright © 2022 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This retrospective study investigated the association between the pattern of disease progression and molecular mechanism of acquired resistance in a large cohort of 49 patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line crizotinib. We found that treatment-emergent ROS1 point mutations were the major molecular mechanism of crizotinib resistance, particularly for patients who developed extracranial-only disease progression. Our findings highlight the importance of rebiopsy and gene testing for subsequent-line therapeutic management., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Neuregulins (NRGs) are a family of six related physiological ligands all containing a receptor-binding epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain that mediate their binding to cellular receptors. Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) is the main physiological ligand to HER3. NRG1 fusion (NRG1+) was first reported in a breast cancer cell line and NRG2 fusions have recently been identified in solid tumors. It is postulated that NRG1 fusions, through mostly transmembrane fusion partners, result in NRG1 being concentrated in proximity to HER3, leading to its constitutive activation and oncogenesis. Recently, a monoclonal antibody that disrupts the binding of NRG1 to HER3 and HER3/HER2 heterodimerization has resulted in NRG1+ tumor shrinkage, suggesting that 'ligand-fusion' may be a novel mechanism of oncogenesis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.N. has received honorarium from Astra Zeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda, Novartis, EMD Serono, Blueprint Medicines, and Tempus. S.H.I.O. has received honorarium as speaker bureau of Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, consulting fees from, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Takeda/ARIAD, Daiichi Sankyo, Jassen/JNJ, is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Elevation Oncology, Inc., is a former member of the Scientific Advisory board of Turning Point Therapeutics, has stock ownership in Turning Point Therapeutics, Inc., is a current member of the Scientific Advisory board of Elevation Oncology, and has stock ownership in Elevation Oncology., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Aumolertinib (formerly almonertinib; HS-10296) is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with revealed activity against EGFR-sensitizing mutations and EGFR T790M mutation., Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who developed an EGFR T790M mutation after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy were enrolled in this registrational phase 2 trial of aumolertinib at 110 mg orally once daily (NCT02981108). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review., Results: A total of 244 patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC were enrolled. The ORR by independent central review was 68.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.6-74.6). The disease control rate was 93.4% (95% CI: 89.6-96.2). The median duration of response was 15.1 months (95% CI: 12.5-16.6). The median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI: 9.7-15.0). Among 23 patients with assessable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR and CNS-disease control rate were 60.9% (95% CI: 38.5-80.3) and 91.3% (95% CI: 72.0-98.9), respectively. The median CNS-duration of response was 12.5 months (95% CI: 5.6-not reached). Treatment-related adverse events of more than or equal to grade 3 occurred in 16.4% of the patients, with the most common being increased blood creatine phosphokinase level (7%) and increased alanine aminotransferase level (1.2%). The relative dose density of aumolertinib was 99.2% in this study., Conclusions: Aumolertinib is an effective and well-tolerated third-generation EGFR TKI for patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced NSCLC after disease progression on first- and second-generation EGFR TKI therapy. On the basis of these findings, aumolertinib was approved in the People's Republic of China for patients positive for EGFR T790M NSCLC., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The sequential use of 1 st -/2 nd -generation to 3 rd -generation epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has led to the emergence of triple EGFR mutations generally consisting of the founder mutation (del 19 or L858R), gatekeeper mutation (T790M) and mutation (C797S) that abolishes the covalent binding of osimertinib to the EGFR protein (i.e., del 19 or L858R/T790M/C797S). Besides C797S, other tertiary mutations confer structural steric hindrance to osimertinib rather than preventing its covalent binding to the EGFR kinase domain such as solvent front mutation (G796S) or others such as L792F/H mutation. "Fourth-generation" EGFR TKIs are being developed to inhibit these triple mutations, in particular, in the background of compound T790M/C797S mutations but they are still in early clinical stages of development. Amivantamab, a bi-specific EGFR/MET monoclonal antibody that can affect Fc mediated trogocytosis of the EGFR protein has been approved for the treatment of EGFR exon20 insertion mutations and has demonstrated activity against a myriad of compound EGFR mutations. Here we report amivantamab monotherapy induced symptomatic, biochemical, molecular, and radiographic responses in a NSCLC patient with triple EGFR mutations in cis in the background of EGFR amplification., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: EGFR exon 20 insertions ( EGFRex20ins ) are a diverse set of mutations in NSCLC that are refractory to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We describe real-world EGFRex20ins detection patterns in patients with advanced NSCLC in the United States., Methods: Data from 2011 to 2020 were extracted from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database., Results: Among 67,281 patients with advanced NSCLC and at least two clinic visits, 66.8% were tested for EGFR mutations, of whom 13.9% tested positive. Of these, 4.9% had EGFRex20ins . The median time from NSCLC diagnosis to the first positive EGFRex20ins test result was 23 days, including 9 days of laboratory testing time. The EGFRex20ins were reported in 0.6% to 1.0% of all patients with advanced NSCLC and account for 3.9% to 5.3% of all EGFR mutations. During the study period, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing rates decreased whereas next-generation sequencing rates increased both in overall and among patients with tumors positive for EGFRex20ins . Tissue was the most common sample type used for EGFR and EGFRexon20ins detection (81.1% and 84.9%, respectively), whereas blood sampling for EGFRexon20ins detection increased from 0% (2011) to 37.2% (2020). For 23.7% of patients with EGFRex20ins , treatment was initiated before receiving the first positive EGFRex20ins test result, with therapies including immuno-oncology agents as the most common treatment type from 2017 to 2020., Conclusions: EGFR testing and detection of EGFRex20ins in patients with NSCLC have increased slightly over time with the increasing use of next-generation sequencing. The current late-stage development of EGFRex20ins -targeted therapy is driving a need for more efficient testing., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.)

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is a proto-oncogene of the RAS-MAPK pathway. KRAS mutations are present in a variety of malignancies including lung, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer. Until the recent approval of sotorasib, a KRAS G12C inhibitor, lack of targeted therapy for KRAS has resulted in poor prognosis of patients with tumors harboring KRAS mutations. While the conditional approval of sotorasib was a major breakthrough for those patients harboring KRAS G12C mutations, G12C only accounts for a fraction of those with KRAS mutations and eventual resistance to G12C inhibitors are unavoidable. This comprehensive review on KRAS inhibitors covers accumulating evidence on not only the G12C inhibitors but also other therapeutic attempts to tackle KRAS including combination therapy as well as direct inhibition with vaccines, adoptive T cell therapy, proteolysis-targeted chimeras (PROTACs) and CRISPR/Cas9., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)