Search

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) exhibited lower serologic responses one-month following the second dose of the COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine compared to those not treated with anti-TNFα (non-anti-TNFα) or to healthy controls (HCs). We comprehensively analyzed long-term humoral responses, including anti-spike (S) antibodies, serum inhibition, neutralization, cross-reactivity and circulating B cell six months post BNT162b2, in patients with IBD stratified by therapy compared to HCs. Subjects enrolled in a prospective, controlled, multi-center Israeli study received two BNT162b2 doses. Anti-S levels, functional activity, specific B cells, antigen cross-reactivity, anti-nucleocapsid levels, adverse events and IBD disease score were detected longitudinally. In total, 240 subjects, 151 with IBD (94 not treated with anti-TNFα and 57 treated with anti-TNFα) and 89 HCs participated. Six months after vaccination, patients with IBD treated with anti-TNFα had significantly impaired BNT162b2 responses, specifically, more seronegativity, decreased specific circulating B cells and cross-reactivity compared to patients untreated with anti-TNFα. Importantly, all seronegative subjects were patients with IBD; of those, >90% were treated with anti-TNFα. Finally, IBD activity was unaffected by BNT162b2. Altogether these data support the earlier booster dose administration in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) affecting millions of people worldwide. IBD therapies, designed for continuous immune suppression, often render patients more susceptible to infections. The effect of the immune suppression on the risk of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is not fully determined yet. Objective: To describe COVID-19 characteristics and outcomes and to evaluate the association between IBD phenotypes, infection outcomes and immunomodulatory therapies. Methods: In this multi-center study, we prospectively followed IBD patients with proven COVID-19. De-identified data from medical charts were collected including age, gender, IBD type, IBD clinical activity, IBD treatments, comorbidities, symptoms and outcomes of COVID-19. A multivariable regression model was used to examine the effect of immunosuppressant drugs on the risk of infection by COVID-19 and the outcomes. Results: Of 144 IBD patients, 104 (72%) were CD and 40 (28%) were UC. Mean age was 32.2 ± 12.6 years. No mortalities were reported. In total, 94 patients (65.3%) received biologic therapy. Of them, 51 (54%) at escalated doses, 10 (11%) in combination with immunomodulators and 9 (10%) with concomitant corticosteroids. Disease location, behavior and activity did not correlate with the severity of COVID-19. Biologics as monotherapy or with immunomodulators or corticosteroids were not associated with more severe infection. On the contrary, patients receiving biologics had significantly milder infection course (p = 0.001) and were less likely to be hospitalized (p = 0.001). Treatment was postponed in 34.7% of patients until recovery from COVID-19, without consequent exacerbation. Conclusion: We did not witness aggravated COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IBD. Patients treated with biologics had a favorable outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Following induction therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) in severe ulcerative colitis, transitioning to vedolizumab as maintenance therapy could be an option. Aim: To report on the largest cohort of patients successfully induced with CNIs who were transitioned to vedolizumab maintenance therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of adult patients with severe steroid‐refractory ulcerative colitis. Patients were included if they were induced with a CNI followed by maintenance therapy with vedolizumab between January 2014 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was colectomy‐free survival. Secondary endpoints included survival without vedolizumab discontinuation as well as clinical, steroid‐free and biochemical remission at week 14. Results: A total of 71 patients (59% male) were treated with vedolizumab after induction therapy with CNIs for severe steroid‐refractory colitis. Patients were followed for a median time of 25 months (IQR 16‐36). Colectomy‐free survival rates from vedolizumab initiation were 93% at 3 months, 67% at 1 year and 55% at 2 years. At the end of induction with vedolizumab at week 14, 50% of patients were in clinical remission, and 62% of patients had a normal CRP. At 1 and 2 years following vedolizumab initiation, 43% and 28% of patients were still on vedolizumab respectively. Vedolizumab was dose escalated to infusions every 4 weeks in 44% of patients. The median time to dose escalation was 5.6 months (IQR 4.1‐8.2). No serious adverse events were recorded in our patient cohort. Conclusions: Transitioning to vedolizumab following induction of remission with CNIs is effective and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are used for treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We aimed to identify molecular effects of JAK inhibition in human intestinal mucosa, considering IBD location and phenotype., Methods: Colonic and ileal explants from patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD), and non-IBD controls (NC) were assessed for phosphorylated signal transducers and activators of transcription (p-STAT) levels and Inflammatory genes expression panel in response to ex-vivo JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib). Cytokine production by lamina propria lymphocytes in response to tofacitinib was assessed. Human intestinal organoids were used to investigate JAK inhibitors' effects on iNOS expression., Results: Explants were collected from 68 patients (UC=20; CD=20; NC=28). p-STAT1\3\5 inhibition rates varied, being higher in colonic compared to ileal explants. p-STAT1\3 inhibition rates negatively correlated with CRP levels. While significant alterations in 120 of 255 inflammatory genes were observed in colonic explants, only 30 were observed in ileal NC explants. In colonic explants from UC, significant alterations were observed in 5 genes, including NOS2. JAK inhibition significantly decreased Th1\Th2\Th17-related cytokine production from lamina propria lymphocytes. Various JAK inhibitors reduced IFN-γ-induced increase in iNOS expression in organoids., Conclusions: Site-specific anti-inflammatory effect of JAK inhibition by tofacitinib was noticed, whereby the colon was more robustly affected than the ileum. Ex-vivo response to tofacitinib is individual. JAK inhibition may attenuate inflammation by decreasing iNOS expression. Ex-vivo mucosal platforms may be a valuable resource for studying personalized drug effects in patients with IBD., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Drug sustainability (DS), a surrogate marker for drug efficacy, is important, especially when aiming for precision medicine. However, it lacks reliable prediction methods., Aims: To develop and externally validate a web-based artificial intelligence(AI)-derived tool for predicting DS of infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)., Methods: Data from three Israeli centers included infliximab or vedolizumab patients treated for >54 weeks. Sustainability meant no corticosteroids, hospitalizations or surgeries. Machine learning techniques predicted >54-week and overall DS using baseline clinical data., Results: The model was developed using data from 246 patients from Rabin Medical Center and externally validated on 67 patients from Rambam Health Care Campus and Sheba Medical Center. No significant difference in DS was observed across the datasets. Most patients were biologic-naïve and primarily treated with vedolizumab. The model performed well, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.86, and showed good accuracy (65.5 %-76.9 %) across the test sets., Conclusions: The study introduces a novel, AI-based tool for predicting >54-week DS of infliximab and vedolizumab in moderate-to-severe UC, using baseline parameters. This can aid clinical decision-making in the framework of precision medicine, promising to optimize disease management while maintaining physician autonomy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest HY- Has received research grants from Pfizer; consulting fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and BMS; Speaker fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and Bristol Myers Squibb; Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board fees from Abbvie, Pfizer Takeda and Bristol Myers Squibb. JEO- Has received grant support from Pfizer, consulting fees from Takeda, and speaker fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. IAB- Has received speaker fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and Neopharm. ID- consultation fee or honorarium from: Abbott, Abbvie, Athos, Arena, Altman Research, Cambridge Healthcare, Celltrion, Celgene/BMS, Eli-Lilly, Ferring, Falk Pharma, Food Industries Organization, Gilead, Galapagos, Iterative Scopes, Integra Holdings, Janssen, Neopharm, Pfizer, Rafa laboratories, Roche/Genentech, Sangamo, Sublimity, Sandoz, Takeda, Wildbio. Grants: Altman Research, BMS, Pfizer UK- Research support- Jannsen, Takeda, Medtronic, speaker/advisory fees- Abbvie BMS Celtrion Jannsen Pfizer Takeda Medtronic Roche No specific funding has been received for this study., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who undergo proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may develop pouchitis. We previously proposed a novel endoscopic classification of pouchitis describing 7 phenotypes with differing outcomes. This study assessed phenotype transitions over time., Methods: We classified pouch findings into 7 main phenotypes: (1) normal, (2) afferent limb (AL) involvement, (3) inlet (IL) involvement, (4) diffuse, (5) focal inflammation of the pouch body, (6) cuffitis, and (7) pouch-related fistulas noted more than 6 months after ileostomy takedown. Among 2 endoscopic phenotypes, the phenotype that was first identified was defined as the primary phenotype, and the phenotype observed later was defined as the subsequent phenotype., Results: We retrospectively reviewed 1359 pouchoscopies from 426 patients (90% preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis). The frequency of primary phenotype was 31% for AL involvement, 42% for IL involvement, 28% for diffuse inflammation, 72% for focal inflammation, 45% for cuffitis, 18% for pouch-related fistulas, and 28% for normal pouch. The most common subsequent phenotype was focal inflammation (64.8%), followed by IL involvement (38.6%), cuffitis (37.8%), AL involvement (25.6%), diffuse inflammation (23.8%), normal pouch (22.8%), and pouch-related fistulas (11.9%). Subsequent diffuse inflammation, pouch-related fistulas, and AL or IL stenoses significantly increased the pouch excision risk. Patients who achieved subsequent normal pouch were less likely to have pouch excision than those who did not (8.1% vs 15.7%; P = .15)., Conclusions: Pouch phenotype and the risk of pouch loss can change over time. In patients with pouch inflammation, subsequent pouch normalization is feasible and associated with favorable outcome., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Underdiagnosis of drug-induced fever leads to extensive investigation and prolongation of hospitalization, and may lead to multiple unnecessary invasive procedures and a wrong diagnosis. Azathioprine is a widely used immunosuppressive drug. We report a case of a 53-year-old female patient diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis treated with azathioprine, who presented to the emergency room with a 6-wk history of fever and chills without other associated symptoms. Since the patient's fever was of unknown origin, she was hospitalized. All treatment was stopped and an extensive workup to explore the source of fever and chills was performed. Results of chest X-ray, viral, urine, and blood cultures, autoimmune serology, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, and abdominal ultrasound revealed no source of infection. A rechallenge test of azathioprine was performed and the fever and chills returned within a few hours. Azathioprine was established as the definite cause following rechallenge. Fever as an adverse drug reaction is often unrecognized. Azathioprine has been reported to cause drug-induced fever in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and sarcoidosis. To the best of our knowledge there have been no previous reports documenting azathioprine-induced fever in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. The occurrence of fever following the readministration of azathioprine suggests the diagnosis of drug-induced fever, particularly after the exclusion of other causes. A careful rechallenge is recommended to confirm the diagnosis.