Search

Introduction: Leukemic involvement in high grade B cell lymphoma (L-HGBL) is rare and has been sparsely described in the literature. We report our experience in a large single institution multicenter academic setting., Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients with HGBL who received care at Mayo Clinic between 2003 and 2020 were reviewed. L-HGBL was confirmed by peripheral blood smear and flow cytometry with corroboration from tissue and bone marrow biopsy findings., Results: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. All patients had significant bone marrow involvement by HGBL. Leukemic involvement presented in 11 of 20 (55%) in the de novo and 9 of 20 (45%) in the relapsed setting. Seven of 20 patients had DLBCL, NOS, 6 of 20 had transformation (t-DLBCL), 3 of 20 had transformed double/triple hit lymphoma (t-DHL/THL), 2 of 20 had double hit lymphoma (DHL), and 2 of 20 had HGBL with intermediate features between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma. Nine of 15 patients had MYC translocation. Based on Hans criteria, 11 of 20 had germinal center B-cell (GCB) cell of origin (COO) and 9/20 had non-GCB COO. Five of 11 de novo patients experienced CNS relapse/progression. All de novo patients received anthracycline-based chemoimmunotherapy. Eighteen of 20 patients died of progressive disease. Median overall survival was significantly better in the de novo compared to relapsed group (8.9 months vs. 2.8 months, P = .01). COO, MYC status, DHL/THL status, HGBL subtype, or treatment group did not demonstrate a significant effect on overall survival., Conclusion: L-HGBL carries a poor prognosis and is associated with MYC translocation, DHL/THL status, transformation, and high CNS risk. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed for L-HGBL., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Patients' concerns regarding clinical trial (CT) participation include apprehension about side effects, quality of life (QoL), financial burden, and quality of care., Methods: We prospectively evaluated the experience of patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma who were treated on CTs (CT group, n = 35) versus patients treated with standard approaches (non-CT group, n = 88) focusing on QoL, financial burden of care, and patients' perception of quality of care over a 1-year period., Results: There were no significant differences in any of the patient-reported outcomes in CT versus non-CT groups. We observed an initial decline in overall QoL in the first 3 months across both groups, driven primarily by physical and functional well-being. QoL gradually improved and was above baseline by month 12. Patients reported highest improvement in the functional well-being subdomain. Patients in both groups reported high satisfaction with the quality of care received, and there were no differences in overall satisfaction, communication with team, or access to care. At baseline, 16%-19% of patients reported financial burden, which increased to a peak of 33% in the CT group and to 49% in the non-CT group over the course of 1 year. There was no significant difference in financial burden in the two groups overall. Most of the patients reported getting all the care that was deemed medically necessary in both groups. However, a significant proportion of patients reported having to make other kinds of financial sacrifices because of their cancer (CT group: 33% of patients at baseline and 21%-40% over 1 year; non-CT group: 19% at baseline and 25%-36% over 1 year)., Conclusion: Patients treated on CTs reported comparable QoL and quality of care with the non-CT group. A high proportion of patients reported financial burden over time in both groups. Our findings can serve as a guide to educate patients regarding CT participation and highlight the need to address the significant financial burden experienced by patients with cancer.

A concerted commitment across research stakeholders is necessary to increase equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and address barriers to cancer clinical trial recruitment and participation. Racial and ethnic diversity among trial participants is key to understanding intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may affect patient response to cancer treatments. This ASCO and Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Research Statement presents specific recommendations and strategies for the research community to improve EDI in cancer clinical trials. There are six overarching recommendations: (1) clinical trials are an integral component of high-quality cancer care, and every person with cancer should have the opportunity to participate; (2) trial sponsors and investigators should design and implement trials with a focus on reducing barriers and enhancing EDI, and work with sites to conduct trials in ways that increase participation of under-represented populations; (3) trial sponsors, researchers, and sites should form long-standing partnerships with patients, patient advocacy groups, and community leaders and groups; (4) anyone designing or conducting trials should complete recurring education, training, and evaluation to demonstrate and maintain cross-cultural competencies, mitigation of bias, effective communication, and a commitment to achieving EDI; (5) research stakeholders should invest in programs and policies that increase EDI in trials and in the research workforce; and (6) research stakeholders should collect and publish aggregate data on racial and ethnic diversity of trial participants when reporting results of trials, programs, and interventions to increase EDI. The recommendations are intended to serve as a guide for the research community to improve participation rates among people from racial and ethnic minority populations historically under-represented in cancer clinical trials. ASCO and ACCC will work at all levels to advance the recommendations in this publication., Competing Interests: Leigh BoehmerConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, AstraZeneca Al BensonConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Samsung Bioepis, Pfizer, HalioDx, AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Natera, Apexigen, Artemida Pharma, Xencor, Therabionic, Mirati Therapeutics, Boston Scientific, HutchmedResearch Funding: Infinity Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Rafael Pharmaceuticals (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Xencor (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Amgen (Inst), SynCoreBio (Inst), Elevar Therapeutics (Inst), Tyme Inc (Inst), st pharm (Inst), ITM Solucin (Inst) Julie R. GralowConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Seattle Genetics Carmen E. GuerraLeadership: Freenome, Guardant Health, Genentech, GRAIL, GlaxoSmithKlineStock and Other Ownership Interests: CRISPR Therapeutics, BEAM Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, Editas MedicineHonoraria: LundbeckConsulting or Advisory Role: EB SquibbSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen, PfizerResearch Funding: Bristol Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Lundbeck, JanssenUncompensated Relationships: Tapestry NetworksOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/515813 Leila HamrounStock and Other Ownership Interests: Abbott Laboratories, CVS Health, Pfizer, AbbVie Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead, TG Therapeutics, Kymera, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Ryvu Therapeutics, BanthamResearch Funding: Celgene (Inst), NanoString Technologies (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst) Alice PressmanEmployment: PRECISIONHeorResearch Funding: Amgen (Inst)Uncompensated Relationships: AstraZeneca Amelie G. RamirezHonoraria: National Medical Fellowships, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Research Triangle Institute RTI Health SolutionsConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, GenentechResearch Funding: Genentech/Roche Karen M. WinkfieldHonoraria: TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, GRAIL, AstraZeneca Eddy S. YangConsulting or Advisory Role: Strata Oncology, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology, LillyResearch Funding: Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst) Lori J. PierceStock and Other Ownership Interests: PFS GenomicsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate, PFS GenomicsUncompensated Relationships: Bristol Myers Squibb, Exact SciencesOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/1250431No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), a heterogeneous group of mature aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, carry a worse prognosis for most subtypes when compared with their B-cell counterparts. Despite recent approval of newer therapies, the outlook for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) PTCL remains poor and new treatment strategies are clearly needed. Targeting the profoundly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in PTCL is one such approach. To determine whether immune checkpoint blockade targeting program death receptor 1 would be effective in PTCL, we conducted an investigator-initiated phase 2 prospective study of single-agent nivolumab for RR PTCL. We report here results of the pre-specified interim analysis., Methods: The primary objective was to assess the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability of nivolumab in PTCL and to assess progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS). Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) was defined as time-to-treatment failure of less than or equal to one month from initiation of therapy., Results: Twelve patients who received at least one cycle of nivolumab were included in this interim analysis. Half (6/12) of the patients had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), 3/12 had PTCL, not otherwise specified. Most (11/12) were advanced stage, had extranodal disease (97.1%) and had received a prior autologous stem cell transplant (50%). The ORR was 33% (95% CI: 12.3 to 63.7%) with two complete response and two partial response. The median PFS was however short at 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.5 to NE); and the median OS was 6.7 months (95% CI: 3.4 to NE). The median DOR was also short at 3.6 months (95% CI: 1.9 to NE). HPD occurred in four patients, three of whom had AITL. Observed grade 3 and higher adverse events (AEs) were non-hematologic in 5/12 (42%), while hematologic AEs were seen in 3/12 (25%)., Conclusions: Nivolumab had modest clinical activity in R/R PTCL. Due to a high number of hyperprogression and short DOR, a decision was made to halt the study. These findings likely reflect the distinct biology of PTCL and should be considered when designing future studies using checkpoint inhibitors in these diseases., Trial Registration Number: NCT03075553., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Studies evaluating Positron Emission Tomography scan after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) in newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are heterogeneous in patient characteristics, treatments and have conflicting results. Here we report association of PET2 with outcomes in two large independent prospective cohorts of newly diagnosed DLBCL pts treated with two RCHOP-based regimens. The discovery cohort consisted of pts enrolled in single arm phase 2 MC078E study of lenalidomide with RCHOP (R2CHOP). The validation cohort consisted of RCHOP-treated pts from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) cohort. Pts who received 3-6 cycles of therapy and had PET2 were included in the study. Patients who progressed on PET2 were excluded. Revised response criteria 2007 were used to define PET2 response PET2 positive (PET2 + ) pts had inferior EFS [24-month EFS 45.5% vs 87.9%, HR 4.0, CI 95 (2.1-7.9), p < 0.0001) with a trend towards lower OS [24-months OS 77% vs 94.8%, HR 2.0, CI 95 (0.9-4.8), P = 0.1] than PET2 negative (PET2-) pts in MC078E cohort. PET2 + pts had an inferior EFS (24 month EFS 48.7% vs 81.6%, HR 2.9, CI 95 2.0-4.2, p < 0.0001) and OS (24-month OS 68.6% vs 88.1%, HR 2.3, CI 95 : 1.5-3.5, p < 0.0001) in the MER cohort. These results were consistent regardless of age, sex and in the subgroup of advanced stage and high-risk international prognostic index (IPI). For MER, PET2 + pts also had higher odds of positive end of treatment PET (OR: 17.3 (CI 95 7.9-37.7), p < 0.001). PET2 is an early predictor DLBCL pts at high risk of progression and death in two independent prospective cohorts. PET2-guided risk-adapted strategies may improve outcomes, and should be explored in clinical trials., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Because there have been a dvances in frontline treatment for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) over the last 2 decades, we sought to characterize the changes in frontline treatment patterns and their association with outcomes. Patients with newly diagnosed MCL from September 2002 through June 2015 were enrolled in a prospective cohort study, and clinical characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients diagnosed from 2002 to 2009 (Era 1) compared with 2010 to 2015 (Era 2). Patient age, sex, and simplified MCL International Prognostic Index (sMIPI) score were similar between the 2 groups. In patients age 65 years or younger, there was less use of rituximab plus hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (R-Hyper-CVAD) (16.1% vs 8.8%) but more use of rituximab plus maximum-strength cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-maxi-CHOP) alternating with rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine (R-HiDAC), also known as the Nordic regimen, and R-CHOP alternating with rituximab plus dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) (1.1% vs 26.4%) and less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens (64.5% vs 35.2%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 12.1%) in Era 2 (P < .001). These changes were associated with improved event-free survival (EFS; 5-year EFS, 34.3% vs 50.0%; P = .010) and overall survival (OS; 5-year OS, 68.8% vs 81.6%; P = .017) in Era 2. In patients older than age 65 years, there was less use of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like therapy (39.0% vs 14.3%) and nonstandard systemic therapy (36.6% vs 13.0%) but more use of R-bendamustine (0% vs 49.4%). These changes were associated with a trend for improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.4% vs 37.5%; P = .051) in Era 2. The shift from R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens to R-bendamustine was associated with improved EFS (5-year EFS, 25.0% vs 44.6%; P = .008) in Era 2. Results from this prospective cohort study provide critical real-world evidence for improved outcomes with evolving frontline patterns of care in patients with MCL., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Epigenetic reprogramming is a hallmark of lymphomagenesis, however its role in reshaping the tumor microenvironment is still not well understood. Here we review the most common chromatin modifier mutations in B cell lymphoma and their effect on B cells as well as on T cell landscape. We will also discuss precision therapy strategies to reverse their aberrant signaling by targeting mutated proteins or counterbalance epigenetic mechanisms., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Mondello, Ansell and Nowakowski.)

Patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have poor outcomes following first-line cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab (R-CHOP). Evidence shows chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade can increase antitumor efficacy. This study investigated durvalumab, a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor, combined with R-CHOP or lenalidomide + R-CHOP (R 2 -CHOP) in newly diagnosed high-risk DLBCL. Patients received durvalumab 1125 mg every 21 days for 2-8 cycles + R-CHOP (non-activated B-cell [ABC] subtype) or R 2 -CHOP (ABC), then durvalumab consolidation (1500 mg every 28 days). Of 46 patients, 43 received R-CHOP and three R 2 -CHOP. All patients had the high-risk disease; 14 (30.4%) and eight (17.4%) had double- or triple-hit DLBCL, respectively. Following induction, 20/37 (54.1%) patients receiving durvalumab + R-CHOP achieved complete response (CR), and seven (18.9%) partial response (PR); 25 (67.6% [95% CI 50.2-82.0]) continued to consolidation and were progression-free at 12 months. Among efficacy-evaluable patients with double- or triple-hit DLBCL (n = 12), five achieved CR and five PR. Adverse events were generally consistent with R-CHOP. Correlative analyses did not identify conclusive biomarkers of response. Durvalumab + R-CHOP is feasible in DLBCL with no new safety signals, but the combination provided no greater benefit than R-CHOP., (© 2021. Japanese Society of Hematology.)

Background: Vaccinations have been hypothesized to play a role in lymphoma etiology, but there are few studies, mixed results, and limited data on lymphoma subtypes. Herein, we investigate the association of vaccinations with risk of major lymphoma subtypes., Methods: We studied 2,461 lymphoma cases and 2,253 controls enrolled from 2002 to 2014. Participants self-reported history of vaccinations against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, yellow fever, and influenza. Polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate OR and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for potential confounders., Results: After multivariable adjustment, vaccination against influenza was inversely associated with lymphoma (OR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66-1.02), which was stronger for last vaccination 1+ years before enrollment (OR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91) and for >5 influenza vaccinations (OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.68). Ever vaccination against hepatitis A (OR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00) but not hepatitis B (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81-1.18) was associated with lymphoma risk, although more recent vaccinations were inversely associated with lymphoma risk for both hepatitis A (<6 years before enrollment, OR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.77) and hepatitis B (<9 years before enrollment, OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93). Ever vaccination against yellow fever was inversely associated with risk (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.96), and this did not vary by time since last vaccination. Although there was no overall statistical evidence for heterogeneity of vaccination history by lymphoma subtype, the only statistically significant inverse associations were observed for influenza and yellow fever vaccinations with diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma., Conclusions: Selected vaccinations were inversely associated with lymphoma risk, with time since last vaccination relevant for some of these vaccines., Impact: Vaccinations against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, yellow fever, and influenza are unlikely to increase lymphoma risk., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Opinion Statement: While there have been numerous advances in the field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) over the last decade, relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) NHL remains a challenge and an area with unmet needs. T-cell redirecting immunotherapeutic approaches including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have the potential to revolutionize NHL therapy. BsAbs target CD3 on T-cells and CD19 or CD20 on malignant B-cells and have shown promises as a novel immunotherapy for NHL. The development of CD19 × CD3 BsAbs such as blinatumomab was met with significant challenges due to dose-limiting neurologic side effects. However, several CD20 × CD3 BsAbs including odronextamab, mosunetuzumab, glofitamab, and epcoritamab emerged recently. They have favorable toxicity profiles, with reduced cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In addition, all these BsAbs have demonstrated very promising efficacy in R/R NHL. With expansion and registrational studies actively ongoing, approvals of these agents for R/R NHL are anticipated in the near future. Some important questions pertinent to future clinical development of BsAbs include when and how to best utilize BsAbs in the management of R/R NHL, whether there is a role of BsAbs in treatment-naïve NHL, and how to combine BsAbs with other therapies. For example, whether BsAbs can be combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy effectively remains to be seen. A plethora of clinical studies will be needed to help address these questions, some of which are already ongoing. In addition, how do BsAbs compare to CAR T-cell therapy and how to choose and sequence between BsAbs and CAR T-cell therapy need to be addressed. While many of these critical questions remain to be answered in clinical studies, we believe the future of BsAbs in the NHL is very bright., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Front-line treatment for follicular lymphoma has evolved with the introduction of maintenance therapy, bendamustine (Benda), obinutuzumab (G), and lenalidomide (Len). We conducted a random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the regimens with superior efficacy. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between 11 modern regimens with different immunochemotherapy and maintenance strategies. G-Benda-G resulted in with the best PFS, with an HR of 0.41 compared to R-Benda, a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.97, a probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 72%, and a posterior ranking distribution (PoRa) of 1 (95% BCI 1-3). This was followed by R-Benda-R4 (HR = 0.49, PbBT = 25%, PoRa = 2) and R-Benda-R (HR = 0.60, PbBT = 3%, PoRa = 3). R-CHOP-R (HR = 0.96) and R-Len-R (HR = 0.97) had similar efficacy to R-Benda. Bendamustine was a better chemotherapy backbone than CHOP either with maintenance (R-Benda-R vs R-CHOP-R, HR = 0.62; G-Benda-G vs G-CHOP-G, HR = 0.55) or without maintenance therapy (R-Benda vs R-CHOP, HR = 0.68). Rituximab maintenance improved PFS following R-CHOP (R-CHOP-R vs R-CHOP, HR = 0.65) or R-Benda (R-Benda-R vs R-Benda, HR = 0.60; R-Benda-R4 vs R-Benda, HR = 0.49). In the absence of multi-arm RCTs that include all common regimens, this NMA provides an important and useful guide to inform treatment decisions., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (PCDLBCL, LT) is a rare, aggressive lymphoma characterized by skin involvement predominantly in the lower extremities. Immunochemotherapy with or without involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) is considered standard front-line therapy. Over-expression of PD-L1/PD-L2 is seen in a high proportion of PCDLBCL, LT cases, but efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in relapsed/refractory, PCDLBCL, LT has not been thoroughly studied. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with PCDLBCL, LT seen at Mayo Clinic from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we calculated progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival in patients who received front-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) with and without ISRT, and salvage ICI therapy for relapsed/refractory disease. A total of 28 patients with PCDLBCL, LT were identified. The median PFS in patients treated with R-CHOP plus ISRT was 58 months (95% CI: 18-112) compared to 14 months (95% CI: 5-not reached; p = 0.04) in those treated with R-CHOP without ISRT. The median PFS from salvage ICI therapy was 10 months (95% CI: 4-not reached), and median DOR from salvage ICI therapy was 23 months [95% CI: 4-26]. R-CHOP with ISRT had a significantly longer median PFS compared to R-CHOP without ISRT as front-line therapy for PCDLBCL, LT. ICIs may have a role in treating relapsed/refractory disease as reasonable activity in heavily pre-treated patients was observed in this study., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Tafasitamab, an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide, demonstrated efficacy in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in the single-arm, phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). RE-MIND, a retrospective observational study, generated a historic control for L-MIND to delineate the contribution of tafasitamab to the efficacy of the combination., Patients and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with R/R DLBCL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy for comparison with tafasitamab + lenalidomide-treated patients (L-MIND). Key eligibility criteria were aligned with L-MIND. Estimated propensity score-based Nearest Neighbor 1:1 Matching methodology balanced the cohorts for nine prespecified prognostic baseline covariates. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Data from 490 patients going through lenalidomide monotherapy were collected; 140 qualified for matching with the L-MIND cohort. The primary analysis included 76 patients from each cohort who received a lenalidomide starting dose of 25 mg/day. Cohort baseline covariates were comparable. A significantly better ORR of 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.4-77.5) was observed for the combination therapy versus 34.2% (23.7-46.0) for lenalidomide monotherapy [odds ratio, 3.89 (1.90-8.14); P < 0.0001]. Higher CR rates were achieved with combination therapy compared with lenalidomide monotherapy [39.5% (28.4-51.4) vs. 13.2% (6.5-22.9)]. Survival endpoints favored combination therapy. Lenalidomide monotherapy outcomes were similar to previously published data., Conclusions: RE-MIND enabled the estimation of the additional treatment effect achieved by combining tafasitamab with lenalidomide in patients with R/R DLBCL., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

In a phase 1b study of acalabrutinib (a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor) in combination with vistusertib (a dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), multiple ascending doses of the combination as intermittent or continuous schedules of vistusertib were evaluated. The overall response rate was 12% (3/25). The pharmacodynamic (PD) profile for acalabrutinib showed that BTK occupancy in all patients was >95%. In contrast, PD analysis for vistusertib showed variable inhibition of phosphorylated 4EBP1 (p4EBP1) without modulation of AKT phosphorylation (pAKT). The pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD relationship of vistusertib was direct for TORC1 inhibition (p4EBP1) but did not correlate with TORC2 inhibition (pAKT). Cell-of-origin subtyping or next-generation sequencing did not identify a subset of DLBCL patients with clinical benefit; however, circulating tumor DNA dynamics correlated with radiographic response. These data suggest that vistusertib does not modulate targets sufficiently to add to the clinical activity of acalabrutinib monotherapy. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03205046.

Patients with asymptomatic/smouldering Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (SWM) have a variable risk of progression to active WM. Our study evaluated 143 patients with SWM consecutively seen between January 1996 and December 2013. With a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] follow-up of 9·5 [8·1-11·5] years, the cumulative rate of progression was 11% at 1 year, 38% at 3 years and 55% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, haemoglobin (Hb) ≤123 g/l [risk ratio (RR) 2·08; P = 0·009] and β 2 -microglobulin (β 2 M) ≥2·7 µg/ml (RR 2·0; P = 0·01) were independent predictors of a shorter time-to-progression (TTP) to active WM. Patients with myeloid differentiation factor 88 wild type (MYD88 WT ) genotype (n = 11) demonstrated a trend toward shorter TTP [median (95% CI) 1·7 (0·7-8·7) vs. 4·7 (2·4-7·7) years for the MYD88 L265P cohort, n = 42; P = 0·11]. The presence of C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) mutation (n = 29) did not impact the TTP (median: 3 years for CXCR4 WT vs. 5·6 years for CXCR4 MUT , P = 0·34). The overall survival (OS) for patients with SWM (median: 18·1 years) was comparable to an age-, sex- and calendar year-matched USA population (median: 20·3 years, P = 0·502). In conclusion, Hb and β 2 M at diagnosis represent independent predictors of progression to active WM. Comparable survival of SWM and a matched USA population argues against pre-emptive intervention in this patient population., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), either concurrent with or transformed from follicular lymphoma (FL) is often excluded from clinical trials. Lenalidomide has response rates of 45% in relapsed transformed DLBCL. Herein we present an analysis of MC078E, a phase II clinical trial testing lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2CHOP) for patients with untreated transformed/concurrent DLBCL (NCT00670358). Adult patients with transformed or concurrent DLBCL were included. Patients received six cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) with lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-10 of each cycle. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were response rates, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Thirty-nine patients were accrued from August 5, 2013 to July 28, 2020 and 33 were eligible by central pathology review. The median age was 64 (24-80) years, 18 (54%) were male, 25 (76%) were concurrent and 8 (24%) were transformed DLBCL. The PFS, EFS, and OS rates at 24 months were 84.4% (CI 95 : 67.2-94.7%), 84.5% (CI 95 : 72.9-98%), and 97.0% (CI 95 : 91.3-100%), respectively. R2CHOP is effective in concurrent and transformed DLBCL. The study supports the inclusion of anthracycline-naive transformed and concurrent DLBCL in future clinical trials of novel immunomodulatory analogues., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Comparative data guiding initial therapy for Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), an infrequently encountered non-Hodgkin lymphoma, are sparse. We evaluated three commonly used rituximab-based frontline regimens: rituximab-bendamustine (R-Benda); dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide (DRC); and bortezomib, dexamethasone, rituximab (BDR) in 220 treatment-naïve patients with WM, seen at Mayo Clinic between November 1, 2000 and October 31, 2019. The median follow-up was 4.5 (95%CI: 4-5) years. The R-Benda cohort (n = 83) demonstrated superior overall response rate (ORR: 98%), in comparison to DRC (n = 92, ORR: 78%) or BDR (n = 45, ORR: 84%) cohorts, p = 0.003. Similarly, longer progression-free survival (PFS) was evident with R-Benda use [median 5.2 vs. 4.3 (DRC) and 1.8 years (BDR), p < 0.001]. The time-to-next therapy (TTNT) favored R-Benda [median, not-reached, 4.4 (DRC) and 2.6 years (BDR), p < 0.001). These endpoints were comparable between the DRC and BDR cohorts. Overall survival (OS) was similar across the three cohorts, p = 0.77. In a subset analysis of 142 patients genotyped for MYD88 L265P mutation, the ORR, PFS and TTNT were unaffected by the patients' MYD88 signature within each cohort. In conclusion, ORR, PFS and TTNT with R-Benda are superior compared to DRC or BDR in treatment-naïve patients with active WM. The patient outcomes with any one of these three regimens are unaffected by the MYD88 L265P mutation status., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statin drugs may protect against the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but data are limited, particularly for NHL subtypes. Furthermore, some in vitro, animal and epidemiologic data suggest there may be a synergistic effect of these two agents, but there has been no test of this hypothesis in NHL. We evaluated the self-reported use of NSAIDs and statins in a clinic-based study of 1703 NHL patients and 2199 frequency-matched controls. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for potential confounding variables. We observed an inverse association of regular use of low-dose aspirin with risk of NHL (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.96) that was stronger with longer duration of use (P < .01). There were no associations for use of regular or extra-strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs, statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs with NHL risk, while an inverse association with COX-2 inhibitors was equivocal. There was also no interaction of low-dose aspirin and statins on NHL risk. Inverse associations of similar magnitude to all NHL were observed for regular use of low-dose aspirin with diffuse large B-cell, follicular, marginal zone and all other lymphomas, although not all associations were statistically significant. In conclusion, low-dose aspirin but not regular/extra strength aspirin, other NSAIDs or statin use was associated with lower risk of NHL. Beyond the potential for the primary prevention of NHL, these data also point to a role of anti-platelet or other effects of low-dose aspirin in lymphomagenesis that warrant follow-up., (© 2021 Union for International Cancer Control.)

The development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in long-term survivors of lymphoma is of increasing importance. Here, we characterize the cumulative incidence and risk factors for CVD in lymphoma patients diagnosed in the current treatment era. From 2002-2015, newly diagnosed lymphoma patients (>18 years) were enrollment into a prospective cohort study that captured incident CVD, consisting of congestive heart failure (CHF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), valvular heart disease (VHD), and arrhythmia. The cumulative incidence of CVD was calculated with death modeled as a competing risk. We estimated the association of treatment with anthracyclines or radiotherapy and traditional CVD risk factors with incidence of CVD using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated from Cox regression. After excluding prevalent CVD at lymphoma diagnosis, the study consisted of 3063 patients with a median age of 59 years (range 18-95). The cumulative incidence of CVD at 10-years was 10.7% (95% CI, 9.5%-12.1%). In multivariable analysis, increasing age (HR = 1.05 per year, p < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.36, p = 0.02), current smoker (HR = 2.10, p < 0.001), BMI > 30 kg/m 2 (HR = 1.45, p = 0.01), and any anthracycline treatment (HR = 1.57, p < 0.001) were all significantly associated with risk of CVD. Anthracyclines were associated with increased risk of CHF (HR = 2.71, p < 0.001) and arrhythmia (HR = 1.61, p < 0.01), but not VHD (HR = 0.84, p = 0.58) or ACS (HR = 1.32, p = 0.24) after adjustment for CVD risk factors. Even in the modern treatment era, CVD remains common in lymphoma survivors and preventive efforts are required that address both treatment and CVD risk factors., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Immediate treatment for asymptomatic, low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL) has not shown an overall survival benefit over "watch and wait" (W/W) strategy. We estimated incidence of treatment initiation at specific time points and assessed its association with the presence of any criteria such as GELF, BNLI, GITMO at diagnosis. FL patients managed by W/W strategy were identified from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE between 2002 and 2015. Cumulative incidence estimates of treatment initiation were calculated using transformation (as the first event) and death as competing risks. 401 FL patients were identified on W/W strategy. At a median follow-up of 8 years, 256 (64%) initiated treatment. For patients on the W/W strategy for 5 years, the likelihood of treatment initiation in the next 5 years was 12% compared to 43% at diagnosis unlike transformation rates which remained steady. Patients with any of popular treatment criteria at diagnosis did not have increased therapy initiation rates (44% vs. 42%) during the first 5 years or lymphoma-related death rates at 10 years (6% vs. 7%). Identifying biological differences in patients with early vs. late or no progression is a critical next step in understanding outcomes in W/W patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Despite a characteristic indolent course, a substantial subset of follicular lymphoma (FL) patients has an early relapse with a poor outcome. Cells in the microenvironment may be a key contributor to treatment failure. We used a discovery and validation study design to identify microenvironmental determinants of early failure and then integrated these results into the FLIPI. In total, 496 newly diagnosed FL grade 1-3 A patients who were prospectively enrolled into the MER cohort from 2002 to 2012 were evaluated. Tissue microarrays were stained for CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD32b, CD14, CD68, CD70, SIRP-α, TIM3, PD-1, and PD-L1. Early failure was defined as failing to achieve event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) in immunochemotherapy-treated patients and EFS12 in all others. CyTOF and CODEX analysis were performed to characterize intratumoral immunophenotypes. Lack of intrafollicular CD4 expression was the only predictor of early failure that replicated with a pooled OR 2.37 (95%CI 1.48-3.79). We next developed a bio-clinical risk model (BioFLIPI), where lack of CD4 intrafollicular expression moved patients up one FLIPI risk group, adding a new fourth high-risk group. Compared with BioFLIPI score of 1, patients with a score of 2 (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.08-4.69), 3 (OR 3.53; 95% CI 1.78-7.54), and 4 (OR 8.92; 95% CI 4.00-21.1) had increasing risk of early failure. The favorable intrafollicular CD4 T cells were identified as activated central memory T cells, whose prognostic value was independent from genetic features. In conclusion, lack of intrafollicular CD4 expression predicts early failure in FL and combined with FLIPI improves identification of high-risk patients; however, independent validation is warranted., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Exclusion of patients needing urgent treatment or requiring novel biomarkers before enrollment has impacted the ability to enroll real-world patients in frontline trials of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The impact of baseline organ function-based eligibility criteria on this effect and clinical trial exclusion is less well-understood., Methods: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma were enrolled from 2002 to 2015 into the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence. The current analysis includes 1,265 patients with DLBCL receiving standard immunochemotherapy. Organ function parameters were identified from criteria for hemoglobin, absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, creatinine clearance, and bilirubin, as reported in frontline DLBCL trials. Abstracted laboratory values from MER were used to determine the percent (%) of patients excluded. Outcomes and cause-of-death analyses comparing ineligible and eligible groups in MER were conducted. An interactive online tool was developed to estimate exclusions based on organ function for future trial design., Results: Between 9% and 24% of MER patients with DLBCL receiving standard immunochemotherapy were excluded on the basis of baseline organ function alone. Ineligible patients based on organ function had significantly inferior event-free survival (hazard ratios, 1.67-2.16), overall survival (hazard ratios, 1.87-2.56), and event-free survival at 24 months (odds ratio, 1.71-2.16). Ineligible patients were more likely to die from lymphoma progression than increased therapy-related complications., Conclusion: Current national and international trials exclude up to 24% of patients from participation on the basis of organ function alone. A significant difference in the outcomes, notably lymphoma-related death, suggests issues with generalization and potential exclusion of high-risk patients. These data will help future clinical trial development and meet US Food and Drug Administration and ASCO recommendations to increase trial accrual., Competing Interests: Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/GileadResearch Funding: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys Thomas M. HabermannConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Kite/Gilead Stephen M. AnsellHonoraria: WebMD, Research to PracticeResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seattle Genetics, Affimed Therapeutics, Regeneron, Trillium Therapeutics, AI Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics Brian K. LinkConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, Abbvie, MEI PharmaResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Genentech/AbbvieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genentech/Roche James R. CerhanConsulting or Advisory Role: JanssenResearch Funding: NanoString Technologies, Celgene, Genentech Matthew J. MaurerConsulting or Advisory Role: MorphoSys, Kite Pharma, PfizerResearch Funding: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, Genentech, Morphosys Thomas E. WitzigConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Abbvie/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Incyte, Epizyme, Cellectar, Tessa Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am a co-inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and pending on the combination of CRM1 inhibitors with salicylates. Please note—simply filed—not even close to being granted.No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Lenalidomide combined with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) (R2CHOP) in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has shown promising activity, particularly in the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-ACRIN trial E1412 was a randomized phase II study comparing R2CHOP versus R-CHOP in untreated DLBCL., Patients and Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, stage II bulky-IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥ 2, and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to R2CHOP versus R-CHOP for six cycles. Tumors were analyzed using the NanoString Lymph2Cx for cell of origin. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients with the co-primary end point of PFS in ABC-DLBCL. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS)., Results: Three hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled; 280 patients (145 R2CHOP and 135 R-CHOP) were evaluable: 94 were ABC-DLBCL, 122 germinal center B-cell-like-DLBCL, 18 unclassifiable, and 46 unknowns. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between arms, and the median age was 66 (range, 24-92); 70% of patients had stage IV disease; 34%, 43%, and 24% had IPI 2, 3, and 4 or 5, respectively. Myelosuppression was more common in the R2CHOP arm. The ORR and CR rate were 92% and 68% in R-CHOP and 97% ( P = .06) and 73% ( P = .43) in the R2CHOP arm, respectively. The median follow-up was 3.0 years; R2CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in risk of progression or death versus R-CHOP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.01) and 3-year PFS of 73% versus 61%, one-sided P = .03, and an improvement in OS (83% and 75% at 3 years; HR, 0.67; one-sided P = .05). The PFS HR for R2CHOP was 0.67 for ABC-DLBCL, one-sided P = .1., Conclusion: In this signal-seeking study, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) improved outcomes in newly diagnosed DLBCL including patients with ABC-DLBCL., Competing Interests: Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, MorphoSys, Genentech, Roche Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/Gilead, Karyopharm TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene/BMS, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys Roche, Seattle Genetics Fangxin HongConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme David W. ScottConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, Janssen, AbbVie, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech, NanoString TechnologiesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Named inventor on a pending patent describing gene expression profiling in prognostication in classical Hodgkin lymphoma, As a member of the LLMPP I am potentially a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to assign cell-of-origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, I am a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to determine the proliferation signature in mantle cell lymphoma, Named inventor on a pending patent describing using gene expression profiling to identify molecular subtypes of GCB-DLBCL Rebecca L. KingResearch Funding: Celgene/BMS Thomas M. HabermannConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, Kite/Gilead Nina Wagner-JohnstonConsulting or Advisory Role: ADC Therapeutics, Bayer, Regeneron, Calibr, Verastem, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Merck, Novartis/Pfizer, Genentech, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Juno Therapeutics, Regeneron, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics Carla CasuloHonoraria: Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Celgene/BMS, Verastem, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Roche James L. WadeEmployment: Johnson & JohnsonStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/BMS, Abbott, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: New Century Health Jonathon B. CohenConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, Seattle Genetics, Abbvie, Janssen, Loxo, Kite/Gilead, AstraZeneca, Cellectar, Aptitude MedicalResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, AI Therapeutics, Genentech, ASH, Lymphoma Research Foundation, Loxo, Bioinvent, AstraZeneca Nadia KhanHonoraria: JanssenConsulting or Advisory Role: IncyteResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb Jennifer E. AmengualHonoraria: Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo, Karyopharm TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Appia PharmaceuticalsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Epizyme John P. LeonardConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Epizyme, Bayer, Genentech/Roche, ADC Therapeutics, MEI Pharma, AstraZeneca, Merck, Morphosys, Nordic Nanovector, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Sutter Medical Group, Miltenyi Biotec, Regeneron, Bayer, Akcea Therapeutics, Sandoz, Nordic Nanovector, Genmab, Abbvie, IncyteResearch Funding: Research Funding: Celgene/BMS, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Takeda, Pfizer, National Cancer Institute, Janssen Oncology, EpizymeTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: BeiGene Jonathan W. FriedbergConsulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma, NovartisResearch Funding: Seattle GeneticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Patient on bone marrow microenvironment signals Lale KostakogluConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech Brad S. KahlConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene/BMS, Juno Therapeutics, Abbvie, Pharmacyclics, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Roche, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bayer, MEI Pharma, TG Therapeutics, Kite/Gilead, MorphoSys, JanssenResearch Funding: Genentech, Acerta Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, Celgene/BMSTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene/BMS, Juno Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Abbvie, Millennium, Seattle Genetics Thomas E. WitzigConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Abbvie/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Epizyme, Cellectar, Tessa Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene/BMS, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: T.E.W. is co-inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and pending on the combination of CRM1 inhibitors with salicylates.No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Patients with the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) historically showed inferior survival with standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Phase II studies demonstrated that adding the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide to R-CHOP improved outcomes in ABC-type DLBCL. The goal of the global, phase III ROBUST study was to compare lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (R2-CHOP) with placebo/R-CHOP in previously untreated, ABC-type DLBCL., Methods: Histology and cell-of-origin type were prospectively analyzed by central pathology prior to random assignment and study treatment. Patients with ABC-DLBCL received lenalidomide oral 15 mg/d, days 1-14/21 plus standard R-CHOP21 versus placebo/R-CHOP21 for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central radiology review., Results: A total of 570 patients with ABC-DLBCL (n = 285 per arm) were stratified by International Prognostic Index score, age, and bulky disease, and randomly assigned to R2-CHOP or placebo/R-CHOP. Baseline demographics were similar between arms. Most patients completed six cycles of treatment: 74% R2-CHOP and 84% placebo/R-CHOP. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for R2-CHOP versus placebo/R-CHOP were neutropenia (60% v 48%), anemia (22% v 14%), thrombocytopenia (17% v 11%), and leukopenia (14% v 15%). The primary end point of PFS was not met, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.14) and P = .29; median PFS has not been reached for either arm. PFS trends favoring R2-CHOP over placebo/R-CHOP were seen in patients with higher-risk disease., Conclusion: ROBUST is the first DLBCL phase III study to integrate biomarker-driven identification of eligible ABC patients. Although the ROBUST trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS in all patients, the safety profile of R2-CHOP was consistent with individual treatments with no new safety signals., Competing Interests: Grzegorz S. NowakowskiConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, MorphoSys, Genentech, Selvita, Debiopharm Group, Kite/GileadResearch Funding: Celgene, NanoString Technologies, MorphoSys Annalisa ChiappellaHonoraria: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen Oncology, Roche, ServierConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Gilead-Kite, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, iQone David W. ScottConsulting or Advisory Role: Celgene, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Janssen, Roche/Genentech, NanoString TechnologiesPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Named inventor on a pending patent describing gene expression profiling in prognostication in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. As a member of the LLMPP I am potentially a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to assign cell-of-origin in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. I am a named inventor on a pending patent on the use of gene expression profiling to determine the proliferation signature in mantle cell lymphoma. Named inventor on a pending patent describing using gene expression profiling to identify molecular subtypes of GCB-DLBCL. Wojciech JurczakResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Merck, Loxo, TG Therapeutics, BeiGene Muhit ÖzcanHonoraria: TakedaResearch Funding: Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Bayer, Merck, Archigen Biotech, Roche, Pharmacyclics, AbbvieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Abdi Ibrahim, Amgen, Janssen David BeladaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Debiopharm GroupResearch Funding: Roche, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, MorphoSys, Pharmacyclics, Archigen BiotechTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Roche Juan Miguel BerguaConsulting or Advisory Role: Daiichi SankyoTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Dok Hyun YoonHonoraria: Celltrion, Roche, Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Samyang, Kirin PharmaceuticalsConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Janssen, Amgen¸Celgene, Green CrossResearch Funding: Samyang, Abclone, Roche/Genentech, Janssen Oncology, Amgen, Genmab, Boryung Federica CavalloHonoraria: Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Gilead SciencesTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Kazuhito YamamotoHonoraria: Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sumitomo Dainippon, Ono Pharmacuetical, Chugai Pharma, Novartis, Otsuka, Mundipharma, Eisai, MSD, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Sanofi, Nippon Shinyaku, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKlineConsulting or Advisory Role: Ono Pharmaceutical, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Celgene, HUYA Bioscience International, Stemline Therapeutics, Eisai, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbvieResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma, Novartis, ARIAD, Takeda, Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Ono Pharmaceutical, Celgene, Solasia Pharma, MSD, Eisai, Zenyaku Kogyo, Bayer, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Incyte, Mundipharma, Yakult Pharmaceutical Koji IzutsuHonoraria: Takeda, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Janssen, Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mundipharma, HUYA Bioscience International, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Fujifilm, CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Celgene, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Eisai, Chugai Pharma Koji KatoHonoraria: Takeda, MSD, Kyowa-Kirin, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Mundi, Dainippon-Sumitomo, Bristol-Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Daiichi SankyoResearch Funding: Chugai, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, AbbVie, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Celgene, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo Myron CzuczmanEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Sarah HerseyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol-Myers SquibbOther Relationship: Bristol-Myers Squibb Adrian KilcoyneEmployment: CelgeneStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene Jacqueline RussoEmployment: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kite Pharma Krista HudakEmployment: Bristol-Myers Squibb, NovartisStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis Jingshan ZhangEmployment: Celgene, Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers SquibbTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene Steve WadeEmployment: Bristol-Myers SquibbStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol-Myers Squibb Thomas E. WitzigConsulting or Advisory Role: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Abbvie/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Celgene, Incyte, Epizyme, Cellectar, Tessa Therapeutics, Portola Pharmaceuticals, MorphoSys, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Celgene, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am co-inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and pending on the combination of CRM1 inhibitors with salicylates. Please note—simply filed—not even close to being granted. Umberto VitoloConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Celgene, RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: Gilead Sciences, Celgene, Abbvie, Roche, Janssen OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, RocheNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is a rare manifestation of lymphoma, with limited evidence for optimal management. The largest patient series, 50 cases of lymphoma and leukemia, was published in 2010 with limited rituximab exposure. This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnostic testing, and outcomes of NL in the rituximab era. Forty biopsy-proven cases of NL, in association with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), at the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively evaluated. B-cell NHL was associated with 97% of NL cases, of which diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common (68%). Primary NL, defined as neural involvement present at the time of diagnosis of lymphoma, was noted in 52% cases. Seventy percent of patients presented with sensorimotor weakness and neuropathic pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was positive in 100% patients. Overall survival (OS) was significantly better for primary NL and NL associated with indolent lymphomas. Relapses were seen in 60% (24/40) of patients; 75% involved the peripheral or central nervous system at relapse. The use of rituximab in the frontline setting significantly impacted progression-free survival (PFS). Transplant consolidation was noted to be associated with improved OS. This study adds to the available literature on NL in the rituximab era. The overall outcomes have improved in recent years. In our experience, MRI and positron emission tomography/computed tomography may be required for accurate assessment of the extent of disease involvement and identification of an optimal biopsy site. The use of rituximab was associated with improvement in PFS, and autologous stem cell transplant was associated with OS., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma, and front line therapies have not improved overall outcomes since the advent of immunochemotherapy. By pairing DNA and gene expression data with clinical response data, we identified a high-risk subset of non-GCB DLBCL patients characterized by genomic alterations and expression signatures capable of sustaining an inflammatory environment. These mutational alterations (PIM1, SPEN, and MYD88 [L265P]) and expression signatures (NF-κB, IRF4, and JAK-STAT engagement) were associated with proliferative signaling, and were found to be enriched in patients treated with RCHOP that experienced unfavorable outcomes. However, patients with these high-risk mutations had more favorable outcomes when the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide was added to RCHOP (R2CHOP). We are the first to report the genomic validation of a high-risk phenotype with a preferential response towards R2CHOP therapy in non-GCB DLBCL patients. These conclusions could be translated to a clinical setting to identify the ~38% of non-GCB patients that could be considered high-risk, and would benefit from alternative therapies to standard RCHOP based on personalized genomic data.

This report presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) evaluation of the adaptations in care delivery, research operations, and regulatory oversight made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and presents recommendations for moving forward as the pandemic recedes. ASCO organized its recommendations for clinical research around five goals to ensure lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience are used to craft a more equitable, accessible, and efficient clinical research system that protects patient safety, ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality. The specific goals are: (1) ensure that clinical research is accessible, affordable, and equitable; (2) design more pragmatic and efficient clinical trials; (3) minimize administrative and regulatory burdens on research sites; (4) recruit, retain, and support a well-trained clinical research workforce; and (5) promote appropriate oversight and review of clinical trial conduct and results. Similarly, ASCO also organized its recommendations regarding cancer care delivery around five goals: (1) promote and protect equitable access to high-quality cancer care; (2) support safe delivery of high-quality cancer care; (3) advance policies to ensure oncology providers have sufficient resources to provide high-quality patient care; (4) recognize and address threats to clinician, provider, and patient well-being; and (5) improve patient access to high-quality cancer care via telemedicine. ASCO will work at all levels to advance the recommendations made in this report.

Primary gastrointestinal (GI) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rare and the optimal management is unknown. We reviewed 800 newly diagnosed MCL cases and found 22 primary (2.8%) and 79 (9.9%) secondary GI MCL cases. Age, sex, and performance status were similar between primary and secondary cases. Secondary cases had more elevations in lactate dehydrogenase (28% vs 0%, P = 0.03) and a trend for a higher MCL international prognostic index (P = 0.07). Observation or local therapy was more common for primary GI MCL (29% vs 8%, P < 0.01), and autologous stem-cell transplant was more common for secondary GI MCL (35% vs 14%, P < 0.05). The median follow-up was 85 months. Primary and secondary GI MCL had similar 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (30% vs 28%, P = 0.59) and overall survival (OS) (65% vs 66%, P = 0.83). The extent of GI involvement in primary GI MCL affected treatment selection but not outcome, with a 5-year PFS of 43% vs 14% vs 31% (P = 0.48) and OS of 57% vs 71% vs 69% (P = 0.54) in cases with single lesion vs multiple lesions in 1 organ vs multiple lesions in ≥2 organs. Less aggressive frontline treatment for primary GI MCL is reasonable. It is unknown whether more aggressive treatment can result in improved outcomes.

Purpose: Feasibility assessments (FAs) are important to establish site capabilities to conduct clinical trials and their suitability for specific trials. However, current FA methods used by biotechnology and pharmaceutical (biotech-pharma) trial sponsors and contract research organizations (CROs) are costly, inefficient, unnecessarily burdensome, and resource intensive. These methods delay trial start-up, act as a barrier to site participation, and ultimately reduce timely patient access to clinical trials and novel treatments., Methods: An ASCO Task Force was convened to assess the specific burdens and challenges with FAs and to develop recommendations to improve their efficiencies and effectiveness. Stakeholders (including trial sites, biotech-pharma sponsors, and CROs) provided insights into challenges and offered solutions through two surveys and an in-person meeting. The Task Force used the feedback to formulate consensus recommendations to improve FAs for oncology clinical trials., Results: Three key recommendations were identified for application across all biotech-pharma sponsored trials: (1) implement a streamlined and uniform FA process across trials and sponsors; (2) minimize and standardize questions; and (3) leverage technology to centralize FAs, facilitate communications, and reduce redundancies., Conclusion: There is an urgency to improve the current FA process, which is costly, inconsistent, inefficient, labor intensive, and of uncertain effectiveness. All stakeholders stand to benefit from implementing these recommendations, which aim to minimize burdens and ensure that more trial sites and patients have timely access to oncology clinical trials. To have meaningful impact, adoption and consistent execution of these recommendations across all trials, sponsors, CROs, and sites are essential.

The aim is to prospectively evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary lymphoma virtual tumor board. The utility of multi-site interactive lymphoma-specific tumor boards has not been reported. The Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board is a component of the International Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN). The format includes the clinical case presentation, presentation of radiology and hematopathology findings by the appropriate subspecialist, proposed treatment options, review of the literature pertinent to the case, pharmacy contributions, and discussion followed by recommendations. Three hundred and nine consecutive highly selected real-time cases with a diagnosis of lymphoma were presented at the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board from January 2014 to June 2018 and decisions were prospectively tracked to assess its impact on the treatment decisions. A total of 309 cases were prospectively evaluated. One hundred and forty (45.3%) cases had some changes made or recommended. The total changes suggested were 179, as some cases had more than one recommendation. There were 93 (30%) clinical management recommendations, 45 (14.6%) additional testing recommendations, 29 (9.4%) pathology changes, and 6 (1.9%) radiology changes. In an electronic evaluation process, 93% of the responders reported an improvement in knowledge and competence, and 100% recommended no change in format of the board. A multidisciplinary lymphoma tumor board approach was found to have a meaningful impact on lymphoma patients while enhancing interdisciplinary interactions and education for multiple levels of the clinical care team.

Double/triple hit lymphoma (DH/TH), known as high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL), is an aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), defined as having concurrent MYC, BCL2, and/or BCL6 gene rearrangements. While gene rearrangements represent significant genetic events in cancer, copy number alterations (CNAs) also play an important role, and their contributions to rearrangements have yet to be fully elucidated. Using FISH and high-resolution CNA data, we defined the landscape of concurrent gene rearrangements and copy gains in MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, in a cohort of 479 newly diagnosed DLBCL. We also show that concurrent translocations and copy number alterations, in combinations similar to DH/TH, identify a unique subset of DLBCL, alternative DH/TH, that have survival outcomes similar to DH/TH DLBCL patients.

Background: Human pegivirus (HPgV) is a single-strand RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae. Although no definitive association between HPgV infection and disease has been identified, previous studies have suggested an association of HPgV viremia with risk of lymphomas., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including 1 cohort study and 14 case-control studies, assessing the association of HPgV viremia with adult lymphomas. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, overall and by geographic region and lymphoma subtype., Results: The overall OR for lymphoma was 2.85 (95% CI, 1.98-4.11), with statistically significantly elevated ORs observed in 8 of 15 studies. There was a small amount of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 28.9%; Q = 18.27, P = .16), and the funnel plot provided no evidence for publication bias. The strongest association with lymphoma risk was observed for studies from Southern Europe (OR, 5.68 [95% CI, 1.98-16.3]), whereas weaker ORs (with 95% CIs) were observed for studies from North America (2.24 [1.76-2.85]), Northern Europe (2.90 [.45-18.7), and the Middle East (2.51 [.87-7.27]), but all of similar magnitude. Participants with HPgV viremia had statistically significantly increased risks (OR [95% CI]) for developing diffuse large B-cell (3.29 [1.63-6.62]), follicular (3.01 [1.95-4.63]), marginal zone (1.90 [1.13-3.18]), and T-cell (2.11 [1.17-3.89]) lymphomas, while the risk for Hodgkin lymphoma (3.53 [.48-25.9]) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1.45 [.45-4.66]) were increased but did not achieve statistical significance., Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports a positive association of HPgV viremia with lymphoma risk, overall and for the major lymphoma subtypes., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: Sex, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) may affect immune response. However, the association of these factors with the survival benefit of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear., Objective: To assess the potential sex, age, and ECOG PS differences of immunotherapy survival benefit in patients with advanced cancer., Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 31, 2019., Study Selection: Published randomized clinical trials comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy vs non-ICI control therapy were included., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for patients of different sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years) or ECOG PS (0 and ≥1) were calculated separately using a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between paired estimates was assessed using an interaction test by pooling study-specific interaction HRs. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline., Main Outcomes and Measures: The difference in survival benefit of ICIs between sex, age (<65 vs ≥65 years), and ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1), as well as the difference stratified by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy in the intervention arm., Results: Thirty-seven phase 2 or 3 randomized clinical trials involving 23 760 patients were included. An OS benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81) and women (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88); for both younger (<65 years: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83) and older (≥65 years: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) patients; and for both patients with ECOG PS 0 (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90) and PS greater than or equal to 1 (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). No significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy was found in patients of different sex (P = .25, I2 = 19.02%), age (P = .94, I2 = 15.57%), or ECOG PS (P = .74, I2 = 0%). No significant difference was found in subgroup analyses by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy in the intervention arm., Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis found no evidence of an association of sex, age (<65 vs ≥65 years), or ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1) with cancer immunotherapy survival benefit. This finding suggests that the use of ICIs in advanced cancer should not be restricted to certain patients in sex, age, or ECOG PS categories.

Purpose of Review: Recent years have seen the development of gene expression profiling and next-generation sequencing in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), leading to a more defined characterization of this disease into distinct subentities. The genomic era has ushered in the possibility of using precision guided therapy, in part based on targeting genes with somatic mutations. Such precision-targeted therapies will ultimately reduce the need for chemotherapy, induce fewer adverse events, and likely enhance the cure rate for these patients. Here, we discuss emerging therapeutic strategies that have been recently developed for the upfront and relapse setting of DLBCL., Recent Findings: Clinical trials exploring precision medicine have showed promising results; however, attempts to enhance frontline immunochemotherapy by adding targeted agents to the R-CHOP backbone did not confirm the expected benefit. The last decade has also seen a revolutionary development of immunotherapy in B cell lymphomas. While cellular immunotherapy demonstrated a striking success of CAR T cells in DLBCL, checkpoint inhibitors have lacked success in B cell lymphomas. A parallel therapeutic expansion has involved bispecific monoclonal antibodies as a powerful tool for redirected T cell therapy independently from costimulatory molecules and major-histocompatibility complex. The landscape of drugs for the treatment of DLBCL has become overwhelmed by the increasing number of targeted and immunological therapies; however, none have enhanced efficacy of frontline therapy. Future direction should focus to redefine therapeutic paradigm and develop mechanism-based combinatorial regimens specifically tailored for DLBCL genetic subgroups.

Advanced practice providers (APPs), including nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs), are part of a growing cancer care workforce. Current hematology-specific education provided by most graduate NP and PA school educations is limited. Mayo Clinic School of Health Sciences launched a hematology-specific fellowship in 2018 to provide APPs with the skills and knowledge required to deliver high-quality specialty care in hematology and blood and marrow transplant (BMT). The fellowship curriculum was developed based on a needs-based assessment study as well as the qualitative reported experiences of current hematology-specific APPs. The curriculum contains didactic in-class education, research opportunities, and mentored clinical rotations in both inpatient and outpatient practice in hematology and BMT. This 12-month fellowship, one of the only postgraduate training programs dedicated to benign and malignant hematology practice, provides structured training for highly qualified graduate APPs interested in developing a rewarding career in hematology., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2020 Harborside™.)

While combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) cures most patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), those with high-risk international prognostic index disease have inferior survival. Enzastaurin as a potent inhibitor of PKC-β and PI3K/AKT pathway suppressor has been tested in many clinical trials including two key studies in DLBCL: Phase III maintenance study (Preventing Relapse in Lymphoma Using Daily Enzastaurin [PRELUDE]) and a first-line Phase II study (S028). DNA extracted from PRELUDE patients' blood samples was retrospectively genotyped identifying a novel genetic biomarker, DGM1 that showed high correlation with response to enzastaurin. A similar finding observed in the S028 study suggested that addition of enzastaurin to R-CHOP may significantly improve outcomes as frontline therapy for high-risk DGM1 positive DLBCL patients. ENGINE is a global, multicenter, placebo-controlled and randomized study to compare the effect of R-CHOP/enzastaurin as frontline treatment in high-risk DLBCL patients. The primary end point for this study is overall survival in patients who are DGM1 positive. Clinical Trial Registration Identifier: NCT03263026.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease, commonly described by cell-of-origin (COO) molecular subtypes. We sought to identify novel patient subgroups through an unsupervised analysis of a large public dataset of gene expression profiles from newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL patients, yielding 2 biologically distinct subgroups characterized by differences in the tumor microenvironment. Pathway analysis and immune deconvolution algorithms identified higher B-cell content and a strong proliferative signal in subgroup A and enriched T-cell, macrophage, and immune/inflammatory signals in subgroup B, reflecting similar biology to published DLBCL stratification research. A gene expression classifier, featuring 26 gene expression scores, was derived from the public dataset to discriminate subgroup A (classifier-negative, immune-low) and subgroup B (classifier-positive, immune-high) patients. Subsequent application to an independent series of diagnostic biopsies replicated the subgroups, with immune cell composition confirmed via immunohistochemistry. Avadomide, a CRL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase modulator, demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients, independent of COO subtypes. Given the immunomodulatory activity of avadomide and the need for a patient-selection strategy, we applied the gene expression classifier to pretreatment biopsies from relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients receiving avadomide (NCT01421524). Classifier-positive patients exhibited an enrichment in response rate and progression-free survival of 44% and 6.2 months vs 19% and 1.6 months for classifier-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.280-0.86; P = .0096). The classifier was not prognostic for rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone or salvage immunochemotherapy. The classifier described here discriminates DLBCL tumors based on tumor and nontumor composition and has potential utility to enrich for clinical response to immunomodulatory agents, including avadomide., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a novel interdisciplinary graduate-level course in chimeric antigenic receptor-T cell therapy on students' knowledge and interests in translational science., Materials/participants and Methods: The course ran November 12 to 16, 2018. Students were surveyed before and after the course. The survey included questions regarding background, self-perceived knowledge/confidence in skills, and interests/predicted behaviors. Students were assigned to work in collaborative interdisciplinary teams to develop a research proposal., Results: A total of 25 students taking the course for graduate-level credit were surveyed. Of these, all 25 (100%) completed the surveys. Students came from variable backgrounds and were at different stages of graduate training. After completion of the course, there was a statistically significant increase in self-perceived knowledge of immunotherapy (mean score of 3.6 postcourse vs 2.6 precourse, on a 5-point Likert scale; P <.001), knowledge of the bench to clinic translational process (3.7 postcourse vs 3.0 precourse; P <.001), confidence in critical reading skills (4.3 postcourse vs 4.0 precourse; P =.008), confidence in immunotherapy-focused grant writing skills (3.6 postcourse vs 2.8 precourse; P <.001), and interest in working in interdisciplinary teams (4.8 postcourse vs 4.6 precourse; P =.02)., Conclusion: The structure of this innovative and comprehensive course serves as a platform for educational courses in interdisciplinary translational research and helps trainees build knowledge and interest in the fields of chimeric antigenic receptor-T cells, regenerative sciences, and immunotherapy., (© 2019 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Residual mediastinal FDG-uptake after frontline therapy for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) may constitute persistent disease or inflammatory changes. We analyzed practice patterns at two institutions to determine how often a mediastinal biopsy influenced patient management and outcome. Forty-two cases were eligible for review, mostly treated with ABVD. Twenty (group1) underwent a mediastinal biopsy and 22 did not (group2). In group1, 10/20 were positive for cHL and proceeded to salvage therapy (ST); 4/10 biopsy-negative patients were observed, and 6/10 received consolidative radiotherapy. Ten of 22 patients from group 2 were observed, 12/22 received ST. Ten of 14 observed patients remained PET-positive and 8/8 biopsies in these patients showed cHL. Deauville score (DS) 5 was associated with a positive biopsy (10/16). No overall survival difference between groups was observed. We conclude that observation and repeat a FDG-PET is reasonable for DS3-4 while for DS5, ST should be considered pending biopsy confirmation when feasible.

Rosai-Dorfman disease is a rare subtype of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. With the last major report published in 1990, there is a paucity of contemporary data on this disease. Our objective was to report the clinicopathological features, treatments and outcomes of patients seen at a tertiary referral center. Sixty-four patients with histopathological diagnosis of Rosai-Dorfman disease were identified from 1994 to 2017 (median age 50 years; range, 2-79). The median duration from symptom onset to diagnosis was seven months (range, 0-128), which was also reflected in the number of biopsies required to establish the diagnosis (median 2; range, 1-6). The most common presentation was subcutaneous masses (40%). Of the 64 patients, 8% had classical (nodal only) and 92% had extra-nodal disease (67% extra-nodal only). The most common organs involved were skin and subcutaneous tissue (52%), followed by lymph nodes (33%). Three patients had an overlap with Erdheim-Chester disease, which had not been described before. Two of these were found to have MAP2K1 mutations. Commonly utilized first line treatments were surgical excision (38%) and systemic corticosteroids (27%). Corticosteroids led to a response in 56% of the cases. Of those treated initially, 15 (30%) patients developed recurrent disease. The most commonly used systemic agent was cladribine (n=6), with 67% overall response rate. Our study demonstrates that Rosai-Dorfman disease has diverse clinical manifestations and outcomes. While this disease has been historically considered a benign entity, a subset of patients endures an aggressive course necessitating the use of systemic therapies., (Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Some patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) present with a concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis. Their outcomes in the rituximab era are not fully defined. Using a prospectively followed cohort of 1324 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with immunochemotherapy, we defined the prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of DLBCL with concurrent indolent lymphoma. Compared with patients with DLBCL alone (n = 1153; 87.1%), patients with concurrent DLBCL and follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 109; 8.2%) had fewer elevations in lactate dehydrogenase, lower International Prognostic Index (IPI), and predominantly germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) subtype, whereas patients with concurrent DLBCL and other indolent lymphomas (n = 62; 4.7%) had more stage III-IV disease and a trend toward higher IPI and non-GCB subtype. After adjusting for IPI, patients with concurrent DLBCL and FL had similar event-free survival (EFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95) and a trend of better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.75) compared with patients with DLBCL alone, but nearly identical EFS (HR = 1.00) and OS (HR = 0.84) compared with patients with GCB DLBCL alone. Patients with concurrent DLBCL and other indolent lymphomas had similar EFS (HR = 1.19) and OS (HR = 1.09) compared with patients with DLBCL alone. In conclusion, DLBCL patients with concurrent FL predominantly had the GCB subtype with outcomes similar to that of GCB DLBCL patients. DLBCL patients with concurrent other indolent lymphoma had similar outcomes compared with patients with DLBCL alone. These patients should not be summarily excluded from DLBCL clinical trials., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)