Search

This prospective, double-blind study was carried out to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive method in the diagnosis of chronic compartment syndrome (CCS). As well, a new radiopharmaceutical known as methoxy isobutyl isonitrile that has been shown to be taken up by muscle in direct proportion to its blood flow was used to illustrate the possible pathophysiology of this syndrome. Twenty patients with a history of chronic leg pain and possible diagnosis of CCS and five normal volunteers had preexercise and postexercise MRI, nuclear medicine imaging, and static and dynamic slit catheter pressure studies. Nine patients had classic symptoms; only five of these nine had abnormal pressure studies. The other 11 patients had an element of pain at rest and had normal pressure studies. The nuclear blood flow studies were normal in all 25 legs tested in this study. Measurement of intrinsic MRI parameters T1 and T2 in the normal legs as well as in those with an atypical history showed a marked elevation with exercise and a gradual return to baseline postexercise that was similar to the pressure curves. In the five patients with a clinical history and elevated pressures, four had abnormal MRI studies with failure of T1 to return to baseline values. Although these results demonstrate the potential of MRI as a tool for noninvasively monitoring muscle status, clinical history and examination remain important in the diagnosis of CCS. This study indicates that the pathophysiology of exertional compartment syndrome does not appear to be related to ischemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aspirin is a simple, globally available medication that has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of colorectal cancer., Methods: This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 66 centres across 11 countries and territories (ten in Asia-Pacific; one in the Middle East). The trial included patients aged 18 years and older with Dukes' C or high-risk Dukes' B colon cancer or Dukes' B or C rectal cancer who had undergone resection and had completed standard adjuvant therapy (at least 3 months of chemotherapy). Patients with contraindications to aspirin, familial syndromes of colorectal cancer, recent other cancers, and clinically significant history of cardiovascular disease or stroke were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to aspirin 200 mg daily or placebo for 3 years, and were followed up for 5 years. Randomisation was stratified by study centre, tumour site and stage, and inclusion of oxaliplatin in adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients, study team, and sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The primary analysis used a stratified Cox model in those commencing study treatment (modified intention-to-treat population), analysing all events to March 31, 2023. Safety was analysed in the same population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00565708). The primary analysis has been completed, but translational studies of putative aspirin sensitivity biomarkers are ongoing., Findings: Between Feb 25, 2009, and June 30, 2021, 1587 patients underwent randomisation, of whom 1550 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 791 (51%) in the aspirin group and 759 (49%) in the placebo group. Of these patients, the median age was 57 years (IQR 48-65); 897 (58%) were male and 653 (42%) female; 271 (17%) had Dukes' B colon cancer, 770 (50%) Dukes' C colon cancer, and 509 (33%) rectal cancer. Median follow-up at data cutoff was 59·2 months (IQR 36·7-60·0). 5-year disease-free survival was 77·0% (95% CI 73·6-80·0) in the aspirin group and 74·8% (71·3-77·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio of 0·91 [95% CI 0·73-1·13]; p=0·38). Any-grade adverse events were reported in 390 (49%) of 791 patients in the aspirin group versus 386 (51%) of 759 in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in 95 (12%) patients in the aspirin group versus 107 (14%) in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Among adverse events of special interest, there were no cases of acute myocardial infarction in the aspirin group versus two in the placebo group; no ischaemic cerebrovascular events in the aspirin group versus two in the placebo group; and three major gastrointestinal bleeds in the aspirin group versus one in the placebo group., Interpretation: In patients with colorectal cancer, aspirin 200 mg daily for 3 years after completion of standard adjuvant therapy was well tolerated but did not significantly improve disease-free survival., Funding: SingHealth Foundation, National Medical Research Council Singapore, National Cancer Centre Research Fund, Rising Tide Foundation, Lee Foundation, Lee Kim Tah Foundation, Duke-NUS Khoo Bridge Funding Award, Terry-Fox Run, Silent Foundation, Cancer Australia, Bowel Cancer Australia, and Cancer Council NSW., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JS declares research funding from Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Immunotherapy has emerged as a standard treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Pembrolizumab became widely available as a first-line (1L) option in Australia following the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) listing in August 2021. The uptake of new treatment options can be lengthy., Methods: The Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer mCRC registry data at participating Australian sites was analysed from January 2015 (when MMR testing became routine). 1L treatment of dMMR cancers was compared with pre- and post-PBS funding., Results: Out of 2819 patients, 2344 (83%) had known MMR status. Of these, 162 (7%) were dMMR, which was associated with older age (median age 69 vs 63 years, P = 0.001), a right-side primary (68% vs 31%, P < 0.001) and a BRAF V600E mutation (49% vs 11%, P < 0.001). Prior to August 2021, 85 out of 117 (73%) patients with dMMR received 1L treatment: 63 out of 85 (74%) chemotherapy and 20 out of 85 (24%) immunotherapy. Following approval, 39 out of 45 (87%) received 1L treatment and 39 out of 39 (100%) pembrolizumab. Of the patients 75 years and older, a significantly higher proportion of patients were treated with any 1L therapy post-PBS listing (89% vs 60%, P = 0.036)., Conclusion: Previously reported associations of dMMR were observed. The higher-than-expected proportion of patients with dMMR is likely driven by the inclusion of older patients in this real-world study. Many patients were able to access immunotherapy prior to PBS listing, potentially through trials or access programs. Early uptake of pembrolizumab following PBS listing has been high, and this effective and well-tolerated option has increased the proportion of elderly patients receiving active therapy., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

This study evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of Medicine Access Programmes (MAPs) for Australian metastatic breast cancer patients on ribociclib. Limited patient awareness of MAP enrolment was identified, emphasising the need for improved education and consent processes. Most patients expressed gratitude for accessing non-funded medications and perceived enhanced medication adherence as a key benefit. Integrating PRO data with real-world registry data provides comprehensive insight for future MAP development., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: Surgery improves long-term survival for resectable, liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With no consensus definition of "resectable" disease, decisions regarding resectability are reliant on the expertise and judgement of the treating clinician working in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This study examines the clinical outcome versus initial assessment of resectability in an Australian population with mCRC., Patients and Methods: Patients with liver-only mCRC diagnosed January 2009 to December 2022 were identified from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry. Patients were classified based on prospectively documented treatment assessment as "resectable," "potentially resectable," or "unresectable." The correlation between initial assessment of resectability and clinical outcome, and any impact of clinicopathologic factors were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival based on initial resectability assessment and resection status., Results: Of 4437 patients with mCRC identified through TRACC, 1250 (28%) had liver-only disease at presentation, with 497 (43%), 277 (24%), and 374 (33%) classified as "unresectable," "potentially resectable," and "resectable," respectively. In total, 516 (41%) ultimately underwent surgical resection, including 30 (6%) of the "initially unresectable," 148 (53%) of the "potentially resectable," and 338 (90%) of the "resectable" at a median of 9.5, 5.9, and 2.4 months from the diagnosis of liver metastases, respectively. Resection in the "unresectable" patient population was associated with younger age (mean age 63 vs. 69, P = .0006), better performance status (ECOG 0-1 100% vs. 74%, P = .0017), and fewer comorbidities (Charlson index 0-3 in 73% vs. 53%, P = .0296) compared with no resection. Median overall survival was longer for resected versus nonresected patients across all categories: "unresectable" (59.2 vs. 17.6 months, P < .0001), "potentially resectable" (57.2 vs. 22.8 months, P < .0001), and "resectable" (108 vs. 55 months, P < .0001)., Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrates the potential for "initially unresectable" patients to become surgical candidates following systemic therapy, more likely in younger and fitter patients, with overall excellent survival outcomes in resected patients. This highlights the value of routine, repeated MDT assessments for patients with liver-only disease who are continuing to respond to systemic therapy, even for those initially considered never to be surgical candidates., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Preventative strategies and surgical treatments for urolithiasis depend on stone composition. However, stone composition is often unknown until the stone is passed or surgically managed. Given that stone composition likely reflects the physiological parameters during its formation, we used clinical data from stone formers to predict stone composition. Materials and Methods: Data on stone composition, 24-hour urine, serum biochemistry, patient demographics, and medical history were prospectively collected from 777 kidney stone patients. Data were used to train gradient boosted machine and logistic regression models to distinguish calcium vs noncalcium, calcium oxalate monohydrate vs dihydrate, and calcium oxalate vs calcium phosphate vs uric acid stone types. Model performance was evaluated using the kappa score, and the influence of each predictor variable was assessed. Results: The calcium vs noncalcium model differentiated stone types with a kappa of 0.5231. The most influential predictors were 24-hour urine calcium, blood urate, and phosphate. The calcium oxalate monohydrate vs dihydrate model is the first of its kind and could discriminate stone types with a kappa of 0.2042. The key predictors were 24-hour urine urea, calcium, and oxalate. The multiclass model had a kappa of 0.3023 and the top predictors were age and 24-hour urine calcium and creatinine. Conclusions: Clinical data can be leveraged with machine learning algorithms to predict stone composition, which may help urologists determine stone type and guide their management plan before stone treatment. Investigating the most influential predictors of each classifier may improve the understanding of key clinical features of urolithiasis and shed light on pathophysiology.

Background: Current guidelines recommend using sequential cardiac imaging to monitor for cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in patients undergoing potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Multiple different imaging cardiac modalities are available and there are few prospective head-to-head comparative studies to help guide treatment., Objectives: To perform an exploratory prospective cohort study of "real-world" CTRCD comparing multigated acquisition nuclear ventriculography (MUGA) at the referring cancer specialist's discretion with a novel echocardiographic strategy at an Australian tertiary hospital., Method: Patients were recruited from haematology and oncology outpatient clinics if they were scheduled for treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab. Patients underwent simultaneous MUGA-based cardiac imaging (conventional strategy) at a frequency according to evidenced-based guidelines in addition to researcher-conducted echocardiographic imaging. The echocardiographic imaging was performed in all patients at time points recommended by international society guidelines. Outcomes included adherence to guideline recommendations, concordance between MUGA and echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements, and detection of cardiac dysfunction (defined as >5% LVEF decrement from baseline by three-dimensional [3D]-LVEF). A secondary end point was accuracy of global longitudinal strain in predicting cardiac dysfunction., Results: In total, 35 patients were recruited, including 15 with breast cancer, 19 with haematological malignancy, and one with gastric cancer. MUGA and echocardiographic LVEF measurements correlated poorly with limits of agreement of 30% between 3D-LVEF and MUGA-LVEF and 37% for 3D-LVEF and MUGA-LVEF. Only one case (2.9%) of CTRCD was diagnosed by MUGA, compared with 12 (34.2%) cases by echocardiography. Four (4) patients had >10% decrement in 3D-LVEF that was not detected by MUGA. Global longitudinal strain at 2 months displayed significant ability to predict CTRCD (area under the curve, 0.75, 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.94)., Conclusions: The MUGA correlates poorly with echocardiographic assessment with substantial discrepancy between MUGA and echocardiography in CTRCD diagnosis. Echocardiographic and MUGA imaging strategies should not be considered equivalent for imaging cancer patients, and a single imaging modality should ideally be used per patient to prevent misdiagnosis by inter-modality variation These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation with larger studies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Horizon scanning (HS) is the systematic identification of emerging therapies to inform policy and decision-makers. We developed an agile and tailored HS methodology that combined multi-criteria decision analysis weighting and Delphi rounds. As secondary objectives, we aimed to identify new medicines in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer most likely to impact the Australian government's pharmaceutical budget by 2025 and to compare clinician and consumer priorities in cancer medicine reimbursement., Method: Three cancer-specific clinician panels (total n = 27) and a consumer panel (n = 7) were formed. Six prioritisation criteria were developed with consumer input. Criteria weightings were elicited using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Candidate medicines were identified and filtered from a primary database and validated against secondary and tertiary sources. Clinician panels participated in a three-round Delphi survey to identify and score the top five medicines in each cancer type., Results: The AHP and Delphi process was completed in eight weeks. Prioritisation criteria focused on toxicity, quality of life (QoL), cost savings, strength of evidence, survival, and unmet need. In both curative and non-curative settings, consumers prioritised toxicity and QoL over survival gains, whereas clinicians prioritised survival. HS results project the ongoing prevalence of high-cost medicines. Since completion in October 2021, the HS has identified 70 % of relevant medicines submitted for Pharmaceutical Benefit Advisory Committee assessment and 60% of the medicines that received a positive recommendation., Conclusion: Tested in the Australian context, our method appears to be an efficient and flexible approach to HS that can be tailored to address specific disease types by using elicited weights to prioritise according to incremental value from both a consumer and clinical perspective., Policy Summary: Since HS is of global interest, our example provides a reproducible blueprint for adaptation to other healthcare settings that integrates consumer input and priorities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MA has received financial support to attend conferences and meetings by AstraZeneca and serves on the advisory board for Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. PAA has/had a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, AstraZeneca, Sun Pharma, Canofi, Idera, Sandoz, Immunocore, 4SC, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Oncosec, Nouscom, Lunaphore, Seagen, iTeos, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, ValoTX, Replimmune. He has received research funding grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, Sanofi. He has received travel support from Pfizer. SA has served uncompensated on the boards of Health Issues Centre, Australia, Victorian Agency for Health Information, and Safer Care Victoria. MPB has received honoraria from BNS Australia, USD Oncology, and Novartis. He holds an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Cartherics for which his institution receives reimbursements. His institution has also received reimbursement for research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pharmaust, Zucero Therapeutics, and CStone Pharmaceuticals. MB has received compensation and research support as an advisor and consultant to Pierre Fabre, MSD, GSK, Servier, and AstraZeneca. MI is on the advisory boards of Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, BeiGene, Amgen, Merck, and MSD and has received honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, as well as research funding from Pfizer. TJ reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and MSD, and advisory boards and committees for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck & Co., MSD, Gilead, Puma, Pfizer Inc., Roche AG, Specialised Therapeutics, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. SK reports honoraria to institution from Astra Zeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD and Takeda; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Amgen; and research funding to institution from Astra Zeneca. MK reports institutional grants from Nordic Farma, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, and Roche; and consulting fees and honoraria paid to institution from Pierre Fabre and Servier. BTL has served as an uncompensated advisor and consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, and Lilly. He has received research grants to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bolt Biotherapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Hengrui USA, and Lilly. He has received academic travel support from Amgen, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine and MORE Health. He is an inventor on two institutional patents at MSK (US62/685,057, US62/514,661) and has intellectual property rights as a book author at Karger Publishers and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press. BTL is supported by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre Support Grant P30 CA008748 and Research Project Grant R01CA249666 from the National Institutes of Health. GVL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Innovent Biologics USA, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, OncoSec, PHMR Ltd, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Qbiotics, Regeneron. JML receives research support from Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis and Amgen, and reports consulting fees and/or honoraria from Amgen, Ipsen, Taiho, Novartis, SAGA Diagnostics and Natera. BM is on the advisory boards of Amgen, MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Beigene and AstraZeneca. GAM has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb and as Principal Investigator his institution has received reimbursement of trial costs from Roche-Genentech. TMM reports consulting fees and participation on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Merck, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GSK, Eisai, and honoraria from AstraZeneca. TMM has received support to attend meetings from Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. LN has received institutional consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, and reports support to attend a research meeting from AstraZeneca. NP has served on advisory boards or received personal honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squib, Astra Zeneca, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Ipsen and Bayer and has received research funding to his institution from Bayer, Pfizer and Roche. TMP has received research support from Roche and Pfizer, and holds a consulting or advisory role for Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Pfizer. SP is compensated consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, EQRx, GSK, Guardant Health, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Turning Point Therapeutics, declares expert testimony to Roche and Merck Serono, and travel support from Janssen and Roche.BJS is on the Advisory Boards/Honoraria for Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Amgen, BeiGene, Janssen, Takeda. JAS has received support for conference attendance from MSD (virtual registration ASCO). JT has received consulting fees or honoraria from Haystack Oncology, Servier, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Merck Serono, Amgen, Novartis, Seres and AstraZeneca. JT is on the advisory boards of Beigene, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Illumina, Novartis, BMS, and MSD. WX has received research support from Merck, honoraria from MSD, Merck and AstraZeneca, and support for attending meetings from MSD (virtual registration ASCO) and Eli Lilly (virtual registration SABCS). WX is on the advisory boards of MSD, Merck and Novartis, and holds unpaid positions as Chair of the Melanoma and Skin Cancer trials group and Australasian Merkel Cell Carcinoma interest group.DY has received institutional payments for his role on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Servier, Specialised Therapeutics, MSD and BayerJZ serves in an advisory/consultancy role for Merck Sharp & Dohme, Specialised Therapeutics, CEND, Deciphera, Revolution Medicine, FivePHusion, Genorbio, 1Global, Novotech, Alloplex Biotherapeutics, NOUS Consulting, and Oncology Republic; owns stock in Biomarin, Ophthea, Amarin, Concert Pharmaceuticals, Frequency Therapeutics, Gilead, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, UniQure, Zogenix, Orphazyme, Moderna Therapeutics, TWST, Novavax, and Teladoc; has received honoraria from Gilead Sciences, MSD Oncology, and Viatris; and his institution has received research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, IQvia, Mylan, Ipsen, Eisai, Medtronic, MSD Oncology and Servier; and has received travel, accommodations, expenses from ICON Group, MSD Oncology, and PRAXIS., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Fumarate hydratase deficient (FHdef) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare, highly aggressive and is believed to arise mostly in the setting of hereditary leiomyomatosis RCC (HLRCC) syndrome with a germline mutation of fumarate hydratase (FH) gene. There is currently little evidence regarding the most effective systemic treatment for advanced FHdef RCC. We present three cases of metastatic FHdef RCC, all achieving tumor response with combination immunotherapy ipilimumab and nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo). A 50-year-old male, a 27-year-old male and a 48-year-old female. The clinical features, diagnosis and medical imaging are reviewed.

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is a poor prognosis cancer and the molecular features underpinning response to treatment remain unclear. We investigate whole genome, transcriptomic and methylation data from 115 oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients mostly from the DOCTOR phase II clinical trial (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12609000665235), with exploratory analysis pre-specified in the study protocol of the trial. We report genomic features associated with poorer overall survival, such as the APOBEC mutational and RS3-like rearrangement signatures. We also show that positron emission tomography non-responders have more sub-clonal genomic copy number alterations. Transcriptomic analysis categorises patients into four immune clusters correlated with survival. The immune suppressed cluster is associated with worse survival, enriched with myeloid-derived cells, and an epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature. The immune hot cluster is associated with better survival, enriched with lymphocytes, myeloid-derived cells, and an immune signature including CCL5, CD8A, and NKG7. The immune clusters highlight patients who may respond to immunotherapy and thus may guide future clinical trials., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Dual anti-HER2 targeted therapy and chemotherapy is the current first-line standard of care for HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with endocrine therapy (ET) the backbone of treatment in hormone receptor positive (HR +) disease. The potential ET benefit in HER2 + /HR + patients is unknown as pivotal dual anti-HER2 clinical trials precluded ET use., Methods: Real-world data from a multi-site registry of consecutive HER2 + MBC patients treated at clinician discretion were examined. Patients that were HR + (ER + and/or PR +) and had received first-line chemotherapy alongside trastuzumab and pertuzumab were explored. Of 362 patients in the registry, 215 were excluded due to being HR- (n = 210) or not receiving chemotherapy (n = 5)., Results: Of the 147 patients included, 91 (62%) received concurrent ET and 56 (38%) had not. Comparing the groups, there were no significant differences in age, performance status, metastatic sites, use of previous therapy and de novo metastatic disease. More patients with ER + PR + disease versus those with ER + PR- or ER-PR + received ET (73 vs 45%). The addition of ET was associated with significantly improved 5-year PFS (HR 0.58, CI 0.37-0.89, p = 0.014) and OS (HR 0.52, CI 0.31-0.90, p = 0.018), with no increase in adverse events noted., Conclusion: The addition of ET to first-line dual anti-HER2 therapy post chemotherapy in patients with HER2 + /HR + MBC was associated with major gains in PFS and OS with no safety concerns evident. Further studies of this combination are justified, along with studies of how best to integrate other agents that are active in this patient subset, including CDK4/6 inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The pertuzumab study in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ nonmetastatic breast cancer in Australia (PeRSIA-ML39622) is an analysis of safety and effectiveness data from the pertuzumab patient registry. Although the prognosis of patients with early stage HER2+ breast cancer has been greatly improved by advances in chemotherapy approximately 25% to 30% of patients develop recurrent disease. Our study aimed to examine the effectiveness of neoadjuvant pertuzumab on surgical outcomes, describe the medium-term effectiveness outcomes of patients treated with pertuzumab, and describe the planned and actual anticancer treatment regimens that patients received. Deidentified data were collected from the patients' medical records and entered into REDCap, between March 2018 and July 2019 (n = 95). The adverse events (AEs) reported most frequently were diarrhea (20; 21.1%), rash (4; 4.2%), and LVSD (4; 4.2%; two patients during neoadjuvant treatment and two patients during adjuvant treatment). AEs, ≥Grade 3 were diarrhea (2; 2.1%) and LVSD (1; 1.1%). Following surgery, a breast pathological complete response (bpCR) was achieved in 65 patients (70.7%; 95% CI: 60.2%-79.7%) and total pathological complete response (tpCR) in 59 patients (64.1%; 95% CI: 53.4%-73.9%). All patients who did not achieve a tpCR obtained a partial response (33/92, 35.9%). Our study is the first to capture real-world data on the use of pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting in Australia. The effectiveness and safety data are consistent with those reported in clinical trials of pertuzumab in patients with HER2+ breast cancer, with no new safety concerns., (© 2022 UICC.)

Background: International guidelines recommend combining a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy (ET) as first line treatment for hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Results from MONALEESA-2 demonstrate superior progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) and ET compared to ET alone. Real world outcomes have yet to be reported., Materials and Methods: KARMA is a non-interventional registry of Australian patients receiving first-line treatment with ribociclib and aromatase inhibitor (AI), obtained via a Medicine Access Program (MAP) for HR+, HER2- MBC. Outcomes were compared with the ribociclib/letrozole cohort in MONALEESA-2., Results: Data from 160 patients at 17 sites was analysed. Median follow-up is 36.5 months. Compared to MONALEESA-2, patients were numerically younger (54.3 vs. 62 years), with higher rates of bone-only metastases (31% vs. 21%). A total of 63 of 160 (39%) patients remain on treatment. A total of 56% of patients had at least 1 dose reduction, with neutropenia (68%) and abnormal liver enzymes (17%) the most common reasons. A total of 17 of 160 (11%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity, with no treatment related deaths. Median PFS was not reached (95% CI 29.9- NR), with PFS at 12 months and 18 months being 76% and 67% respectively versus 25.3 months, 73% and 63% in MONALEESA-2., Conclusion: The ribociclib and AI combination was well tolerated in this real-world setting. The KARMA registry cohort achieved a superior PFS (>36.5 months) to MONALEESA-2, potentially due to more favourable baseline disease characteristics. Less frequent assessment scheduling in this non trial setting may also contribute., Competing Interests: Disclosure Vanessa Wong has received speaker honoraria from Amgen and Janssen, and her affiliated institution is the recipient of research grant funding from Pierre-Fabre, Amgen, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca and Merck. Richard de Boer is on the Australian advisory board for Eli Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer, received speaker honoraria from Novartis and Eli Lilly, and research funding from Novartis and Pfizer. Katharine Cuff has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, is on the advisory board for Novartis, Pfizer and Ipsen, and is part of Amgen education support. Sheau Wen Lok's breast research team has received funding from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche and Amgen., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The development of brain metastases occurs commonly in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and is associated with a poorer prognosis. The advent of HER2-targeted therapy has improved overall survival, but the benefit in patients with brain metastases is unclear, as these patients are often excluded from clinical trials. This study aimed to explore real-world outcomes in patients with brain metastases in HER2-positive MBC., Materials & Methods: Data was extracted from the TABITHA registry, which consists of patient data collected prospectively from 16 Australian sites from 24th February 2015 to 31st October 2021. Data analysed included characteristics of brain metastases, treatment received and survival outcomes., Results: A total of 135 (37%) of 361 patients with HER2-positive MBC were diagnosed with brain metastases during their clinical course, including 45 (12%) with brain metastases at time of MBC diagnosis. 61 (45%) had ≥4 brain lesions. The most common local therapy given was whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (36%) followed by multi-modality treatment with both surgery and radiation therapy (27%). The majority of patients received first-line HER2-targeted treatment with trastuzumab and pertuzumab followed by second-line trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) but third-line therapy was heterogenous. The median overall survival in patients who developed brain metastases was significantly shorter than those who did not develop brain metastases (58.9 vs. 96.1 months, P = .02)., Conclusion: Real-world patients diagnosed with brain metastases in HER2-positive MBC have a relatively poor prognosis, despite advances in HER2-targeted treatment. As the range of HER2-targeted treatment expands, it is important to pursue clinical trials that focus on patients with brain metastases., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: International practice guidelines recommend administration of bone-modifying agents (BMA) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with bone metastases to reduce skeletal-related events (SRE). Optimal delivery of BMA in routine clinical practice, including agent selection and prescribing intervals, remains unclear., Aim: To describe real-world practice of Australian breast oncologists., Methods: Prospective data from February 2015 to July 2020 on BMA delivery to MBC patients with bone metastases was analysed from Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer in the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Australian Patient (TABITHA), a multi-site Australian HER2+ MBC registry., Results: Of 333 HER2+ MBC patients, 171 (51%) had bone metastases at diagnosis, with a mean age of 58.1 years (range, 32-87). One hundred and thirty (76%) patients received a BMA, with 90 (69%) receiving denosumab and 40 (31%) receiving a bisphosphonate. Patients who received a BMA were more likely to have received concurrent first-line systemic anti-HER2 therapy (95% vs 83%; P = 0.04), to present with bone-only metastases at diagnosis (24% vs 7%; P = 0.02) and less likely to have visceral metastases (51% vs 71%; P = 0.03). Ten of 40 (25%) bisphosphonate patients and 45 of 90 (50%) denosumab patients received their BMA at the recommended 4-weekly interval. Prescribing intervals varied over time. Adverse events reported were consistent with clinical trial data., Conclusion: Three-quarters of Australian HER2+ MBC patients with bone metastases receive a BMA, often at different schedules than guidelines recommend. Further studies, including all MBC subtypes, are warranted to better understand clinicians' prescribing rationale and potential consequences of current prescribing practice on SRE incidence., (© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: RAS mutation testing now routinely informs the optimal management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), specifically the finding of a RAS mutation defines patients who will not benefit from treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor. Over time more RAS genes have been tested and more sensitive techniques used., Aims: To review routine care RAS testing and results over time., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the molecular data collected prospectively in the multi-site Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry from 2009 to 2018 was undertaken. Patients with RAS data were further analyzed. In parallel, the RAS mutation status of patients enrolled in the Test Tailor Treat (TTT) program was examined for 2011-2018., Results: Of 2908 patients in the TRACC registry, 1892 (65%) were tested, with 898 (47%) of tested patients found to be RAS mutant (RASmt). RAS data were available for 5935 TTT patients. Of the tested TRACC patients diagnosed in 2009 and 2010, 38% were RASmt. For each 2-year period from 2011/2012 through to 2017/2018, the prevalence of RASmt in TRACC and TTT was 42% and 40% (2011/2012), 52% and 40% (2013/2014), 47% and 49% (2015/2016), and 47% and 49% (2017/2018)., Conclusions: Based on both TRACC and TTT data, the proportion of patients reported to have a RAS mutation increased from 2009 to 2015 but has remained relatively stable in recent years. The increased proportion of RASmt patients observed over time is likely largely driven by the uptake of extended RAS testing., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Vaccination is the cornerstone of the global public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Excess morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 infection is seen in people with cancer. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been observed in this medically vulnerable population, although associated attitudes and beliefs remain poorly understood., Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of people with solid organ cancers was conducted through nine health services across Australia. Demographics, cancer-related characteristics and vaccine uptake were collected. Perceptions and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccination were assessed using the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale and the Disease Influenced Vaccine Acceptance Scale-6., Results: Between June and October 2021, 2691 people with solid organ cancers completed the survey. The median age was 62.5 years ( SD = 11.8; range 19-95), 40.9% were male, 71.3% lived in metropolitan areas and 90.3% spoke English as their first language. The commonest cancer diagnoses were breast (36.6%), genitourinary (18.6%) and gastrointestinal (18.3%); 59.2% had localized disease and 56.0% were receiving anti-cancer therapy. Most participants (79.7%) had at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Vaccine uptake was higher in people who were older, male, metropolitan, spoke English as a first language and had a cancer diagnosis for more than six months. Vaccine hesitancy was higher in people who were younger, female, spoke English as a non-dominant language and lived in a regional location, and lower in people with genitourinary cancer. Vaccinated respondents were more concerned about being infected with COVID-19 and less concerned about vaccine safety and efficacy., Conclusions: People with cancer have concerns about acquiring COVID-19, which they balance against vaccine-related concerns about the potential impact on their disease progress and/or treatment. Detailed exploration of concerns in cancer patients provides valuable insights, both for discussions with individual patients and public health messaging for this vulnerable population.

Background: Combination molecular targeted therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib has been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with BRAF V600 mutated unresectable or metastatic melanoma. In general, these agents are well tolerated. Kidney related adverse events are uncommon with only three case reports of acute interstitial nephritis and one case of a serious acute kidney injury. We report another case of interstitial nephritis related to these drugs., Case: A 37-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic melanoma (BRAF V600E mutation) who developed acute interstitial nephritis 5 years into his treatment with combination dabrafenib plus trametinib therapy. He presented with an asymptomatic acute kidney injury on routine surveillance pathology with a creatinine of 174 μmol/L (from baseline 80 μmol/L) and a corresponding estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 42 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (from a baseline >90 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) and microalbuminuria (albumin creatinine ratio [ACR] 8.5 mg/mmol). Renal biopsy revealed a granulomatous interstitial nephritis likely drug related. He was treated with prednisolone 1 mg/kg and ceased his targeted therapy with improvement in his renal function., Conclusion: Although rare, recognition of acute interstitial nephritis, a possible serious adverse outcome due to dabrafenib and trametinib is important and needs to be incorporated into current Australian cancer therapy guidelines., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer continues to be debated. The presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) after surgery predicts very poor recurrence-free survival, whereas its absence predicts a low risk of recurrence. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for ctDNA-positive patients is not well understood., Methods: We conducted a trial to assess whether a ctDNA-guided approach could reduce the use of adjuvant chemotherapy without compromising recurrence risk. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to have treatment decisions guided by either ctDNA results or standard clinicopathological features. For ctDNA-guided management, a ctDNA-positive result at 4 or 7 weeks after surgery prompted oxaliplatin-based or fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Patients who were ctDNA-negative were not treated. The primary efficacy end point was recurrence-free survival at 2 years. A key secondary end point was adjuvant chemotherapy use., Results: Of the 455 patients who underwent randomization, 302 were assigned to ctDNA-guided management and 153 to standard management. The median follow-up was 37 months. A lower percentage of patients in the ctDNA-guided group than in the standard-management group received adjuvant chemotherapy (15% vs. 28%; relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 2.65). In the evaluation of 2-year recurrence-free survival, ctDNA-guided management was noninferior to standard management (93.5% and 92.4%, respectively; absolute difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 6.2 [noninferiority margin, -8.5 percentage points]). Three-year recurrence-free survival was 86.4% among ctDNA-positive patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and 92.5% among ctDNA-negative patients who did not., Conclusions: A ctDNA-guided approach to the treatment of stage II colon cancer reduced adjuvant chemotherapy use without compromising recurrence-free survival. (Supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and others; DYNAMIC Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12615000381583.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

As COVID-19 vaccinations became available and were proven effective in preventing serious infection, uptake amongst individuals varied, including in medically vulnerable populations. This cross-sectional multi-site study examined vaccine uptake, hesitancy, and explanatory factors amongst people with serious and/or chronic health conditions, including the impact of underlying disease on attitudes to vaccination. A 42-item survey was distributed to people with cancer, diabetes, or multiple sclerosis across ten Australian health services from 30 June to 5 October 2021. The survey evaluated sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics and incorporated three validated scales measuring vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-related beliefs generally and specific to their disease: the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale and the Disease Influenced Vaccine Acceptance Scale-Six. Among 4683 participants (2548 [54.4%] female, 2108 [45.0%] male, 27 [0.6%] other; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [13.3] years; 3560 [76.0%] cancer, 842 [18.0%] diabetes, and 281 [6.0%] multiple sclerosis), 3813 (81.5%) self-reported having at least one COVID-19 vaccine. Unvaccinated status was associated with younger age, female sex, lower education and income, English as a second language, and residence in regional areas. Unvaccinated participants were more likely to report greater vaccine hesitancy and more negative perceptions toward vaccines. Disease-related vaccine concerns were associated with unvaccinated status and hesitancy, including greater complacency about COVID-19 infection, and concerns relating to vaccine efficacy and impact on their disease and/or treatment. This highlights the need to develop targeted strategies and education about COVID-19 vaccination to support medically vulnerable populations and health professionals.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer mortality in Australia, thus carrying a significant disease burden., Aims: This analysis aims to explore real-world treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting., Methods: We retrospectively analysed treatment of recurrent and advanced colorectal cancer (TRACC) registry database from 2009 onwards. Patients treated with palliative intent who progressed after two lines of therapies were included. One treatment line was defined as any combination of systemic therapy given until progression., Results: Out of 1820 patients treated palliatively, 32% (590 patients) met study criteria. Of these, 43% (254 patients) proceeded to third-line therapy, equating to 14% of all metastatic patients. In KRAS mutant or unknown tumours (97 patients), fluoropyrimidine (FP)-oxaliplatin combination was the most common choice (51%), followed by FP-irinotecan (15%), trifluridine/tipiracil (11%), mono-chemotherapy (10%), regorafenib (5%) and others (7%). Majority of FP-doublet (83%) was given as rechallenge. In 157 patients with KRAS wildtype disease, monotherapy with EGFR inhibitor was most commonly used (41%), followed by EGFR inhibitor with chemotherapy (20%), FP-doublet (18%), mono-chemotherapy (6%), trifluridine/tipiracil (6%), regorafenib (1%) and others (8%). Median overall survival was 7.1 months (range 0.4-41.2), and median time on third-line treatment was 3 months (range 0.1-40)., Conclusions: In real-world Australian population, treatment choices differed based on KRAS status and will likely change with the availability of newer drugs on the pharmaceutical benefits scheme. Survival outcomes are comparable to newer agents in clinical trials for select patients., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: Complementary medicines (CM) are frequently used by patients with cancer. Controversy exists over the effectiveness and risk that CM may add to conventional cancer therapy. The incidence of CM use among patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials is unknown., Methods: Medication lists from 6 international phase III clinical trials were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients using CM. Patients had metastatic breast, colorectal, or lung cancers. Quality of life, adverse events, overall survival, and progression-free survival were compared between CM users and non-users. Baseline differences between groups were adjusted with propensity score matching groups., Results: Seven hundred and six of 3446 patients (20.5%) used at least one CM. CM use was highest among patients with breast cancer (35.6%). CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors (ECOG 0-1, non-smoking status, younger age, and fewer metastases). CM use was associated with lower rates of adverse events (50% vs. 62%, P = .002) and quality of life was similar between both groups. After adjustment with propensity score matching, CM use was also associated with longer overall survival in patients with lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.80, 95%CI, 0.68-0.94, P =.0054). However, several key control variables like EGFR status were not available., Conclusion: One in 5 patients in phase III clinical trials report using CM. CM was not associated with worse cancer-specific outcomes. However, CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors, and likely other confounders that may have contributed to improved outcomes observed in the lung cohort. Physicians should monitor for CM use and potential interactions with clinical trial drugs., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Introduction: The optimal management of isolated distant lymph node metastases (IDLNM) from a colorectal primary, is not clearly established. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with IDLNM treated with systemic therapies plus locoregional therapy with curative intent versus systemic therapies with palliative intent., Materials & Methods: Clinical data were collected and reviewed from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry, a prospective, comprehensive registry for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated at multiple tertiary hospitals across Australia. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes were analyzed in patients with IDLNM and compared to patients with disease at other sites., Results: Of 3408 mCRC patients diagnosed 2009 to 2020, with median follow-up of 38.0 months, 93 (2.7%) were found to have IDLNM. Compared to mCRC at other sites, patients with IDLNM were younger (mean age: 62.1 vs. 65.6 years, P = .02), more likely to have metachronous disease (57.0% vs. 38.9%, P < .01), be KRAS wild-type (74.6% vs. 53.9%, P< .01) and BRAF mutant (12.9% vs. 6.2%, P = .01). Amongst mCRC patients with IDLNM, 24 (25.8%) received treatment with curative intent and had a significantly better overall median survival than those treated with palliative intent (73.5 months vs. 23.2 months, P = .01). These 24 patients had an overall median survival similar (62.7 months, P = .82) to patients with isolated liver or lung metastases also treated with curative intent., Conclusion: Curative treatment strategies (radiotherapy or surgery), with or without systemic therapy, should be considered for mCRC patients with IDLNM where appropriate as assessed by the multidisciplinary team., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Early involvement of palliative care and advance care planning improves quality-of-life outcomes and survival for patients with advanced lung cancer; however, there are barriers to implementation., Aims: A single-centre prospective audit reviewing 'Goals of Care' (GOC) form completion and palliative care referrals in an oncology clinic was undertaken with the aim of increasing GOC completion and palliative care referrals for patients with advanced lung cancer., Methods: Involved physicians attended a communication skills course and then received a communication-priming intervention. Clinicopathological factors associated with GOC completion and palliative care referral were explored., Results: A total of 84 patients receiving palliative treatment for advanced lung cancer was enrolled. Clinicopathological factors, such as poorer performance status, were associated with higher likelihood of GOC completion (P = 0.018) prior to the intervention. Male sex (P = 0.023), absence of sensitising epidermal growth factor receptor mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement (P = 0.017), type of systemic therapy (P = 0.031) and poorer performance status (P < 0.001) were associated with higher likelihood of palliative care referral. The intervention improved GOC completion (relative risk (RR) 1.29, P = 0.004); however, this was not sustained in a follow-up audit (RR 0.98, P = 0.92) and there was no change in palliative care referral rate (RR 2.5, P = 0.16). Predictors of palliative referral following clinical review included age (RR 1.16, P = 0.001), male sex (RR 14.2, P = 0.02) and poorer performance status (RR 1.76, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Communication-priming interventions can improve GOC completion for patients with advanced lung cancer. Further investigation is needed to pursue sustainable options for managing this complex patient group and improve guideline-adherence and patient care., (© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: The management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients with a poor performance status (PS) continues to be a clinical dilemma, with the potential activity and safety of treating this population remaining poorly understood. Few of these patients are enrolled onto clinical trials, and poor PS is often multifactorial., Patients and Methods: We analyzed the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry to describe treatment practices and outcomes in poor (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] PS 2) and very poor PS (ECOG PS > 2) patients to explore the relationship between age, tumor burden, comorbidities, and PS, and to evaluate the benefit of systemic therapy. Standard descriptive statistical methods, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a multivariate Cox regression model were used., Results: Of 2769 registry patients (diagnosed January 2009 to June 2018), 329 (12%) and 182 (7%) patients had a poor and very poor PS, respectively. Good PS patients were more likely to receive systemic therapy than poor and very poor PS patients (85%, 55%, and 21.5%, P < .0001), but clinician assessed response was observed in all subsets (53%, 41%, and 29%, P = .0003). Treatment with chemotherapy was associated with longer median overall survival across PS groups. Exploratory analysis based on comorbidity score and tumor burden subgroups demonstrated a consistently positive overall survival association with treatment. Benefit was observed where poor overall survival was attributable to medical comorbidities and to tumor burden., Conclusion: In routine clinical care, a substantial proportion of poor and very poor PS patients receive active treatment, which is often associated with meaningful clinical benefit., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF)-V600E mutations (BRAFmt) in colorectal cancer (CRC) predominantly occur in right-side (RS) primaries. In metastatic CRC (mCRC), there is substantial overlap between the reported features of BRAFmt and of an RS primary., Objectives: To explore the significance of BRAFmt in a left-side (LS) primary, we analysed data from a multi-site mCRC registry. Tumours distal to the splenic flexure were considered LS., Results: Of 3380 patients enrolled from June 2009 to June 2020, 214 (13%) of 1657 with known status were BRAFmt: 127 (24%) of 524 RS and 87 (8%) of 1133 LS. LS versus RS BRAFmt were younger (mean 59.5 vs. 65.1 years; p = 0.01), whereas sex (48 vs. 59% female; p = 0.13), mismatch repair-deficiency (dMMR) (16 vs. 21%; p = 0.47), and overall survival (OS) (median 15.1 vs. 17.7 months; p = 0.98) were similar. LS BRAFmt versus LS BRAF wildtype (wt) were of similar age (59.5 vs. 61.3 years; p = 0.28) with more females (48 vs. 37%; p = 0.04), more dMMR (16 vs. 1%; p < 0.0001), and inferior OS (median 15.1 vs. 36.6 months; p < 0.0001). Initial treatment with chemotherapy plus an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor produced median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.3 versus 12.3 months (p = 0.20) for LS BRAFmt (n = 9) versus LS BRAFwt (n = 104). Initial chemotherapy and bevacizumab produced a median PFS of 7.6 versus 11.6 months (p = 0.02) for LS BRAFmt (n = 36) versus LS BRAFwt (n = 438), respectively., Conclusion: LS BRAFmt cancers share many features with RS BRAFmt cancers, including poor survival outcomes. Mature data on the activity of BRAF-targeted therapies in the first-line setting are eagerly awaited.

Background: Resection of oligometastases improves survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). It is unclear whether the benefit is consistent for BRAF V600E mutant (MT) and wild type (WT) mCRC. This retrospective analysis explores the influence of BRAF MT on survival after metastasectomy., Methods: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for BRAF MT and WT mCRC were evaluated. Survival was also analyzed in the cohort of BRAF MT with or without metastasectomy., Results: Five hundred and thirteen patients who had undergone metastasectomy were identified, 6% were BRAF-MT. Median age 63. Median OS in BRAF MT vs WT: 25.7 vs 48.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95; 1.18-3.22). However, difference was not significant in a multivariate model. Right primary tumor, intact primary, >1 metastatic site, non-R0 resection, peritoneal metastasis, and synchronous metastasis were independent predictors of worse OS. Among 364 patients with RFS data there was no difference between BRAF MT and WT (16 vs 19 months, p=0.09). In another cohort of 158 BRAF-MT patients, OS was significantly better after metastasectomy compared to "no metastasectomy" (HR 0.34; 0.18-0.65, P= 0.001). Proficient mismatch repair status showed a trend toward worse survival after metastasectomy in BRAF MT (HR 1.71, P = 0.08)., Conclusion: OS did not differ after metastasectomy between BRAF MT and WT in a multivariate model. Median OS was >2 years in this study after metastasectomy among BRAFV600E MT patients suggesting a survival benefit of metastasectomy in this group where systemic therapeutic options are limited. Metastasectomy may be considered in carefully selected BRAF-MT patients., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Simulation models utilizing real-world data have potential to optimize treatment sequencing strategies for specific patient subpopulations, including when conducting clinical trials is not feasible. We aimed to develop a simulation model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for first-line doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for specific subgroups of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients based on registry data., Methods: Data from 867 patients were used to develop two survival models and one logistic regression model that populated a discrete event simulation (DES). Discrimination and calibration were used for internal validation of these models separately and predicted and observed medians and Kaplan-Meier plots were compared for the integrated DES. Bootstrapping was performed to correct for optimism in the internal validation and to generate correlated sets of model parameters for use in a probabilistic analysis to reflect parameter uncertainty., Results: The survival models showed good calibration based on the regression slopes and modified Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics at 1 and 2 years, but not for short-term predictions at 0.5 years. Modified C-statistics indicated acceptable discrimination. The simulation estimated that median first-line PFS (95% confidence interval) of 219 (25%) patients could be improved from 175 days (156-199) to 269 days (246-294) if treatment would be targeted based on the highest expected PFS., Conclusions: Extensive internal validation showed that DES accurately estimated the outcomes of treatment combination strategies for specific subpopulations, with outcomes suggesting treatment could be optimized. Although results based on real-world data are informative, they cannot replace randomized trials.

Cancer has become a prevalent disease, affecting millions of new patients globally each year. The COVID-19 pandemic is having far-reaching impacts around the world, causing substantial disruptions to health and health care systems that are likely to last for a prolonged period. Early data have suggested that having cancer is a significant risk factor for mortality from severe COVID-19. A diverse group of medical oncologists met to formulate detailed practical advice on systemic anticancer treatments during this crisis. In the context of broad principles, issues including risks of treatment, principles of prioritizing resources, treatment of elderly patients, and psychosocial impact are discussed. Detailed treatment advice and options are given at a tumor stream level. We must maintain care for patients with cancer as best we can and recognize that COVID-19 poses a significant competing risk for death that changes conventional treatment paradigms.

Purpose: Stone burden has been reported as an independent predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); however no consensus exists on a standardized method for measuring stone burden. Recently, stone volume has been advocated as the most accurate means of measuring stone burden. We aimed to compare different measuring methods of stone burden and to identify the predictive value of each for outcomes after PCNL. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent PCNL between 2006 and 2013. A preoperative CT and postoperative imaging at discharge were necessary for eligibility. Stone burden was assessed through four different ways on CT images: (1) cumulative stone diameter; (2) estimated SA (surface area) calculated as longest × orthogonal diameter × π/4; (3) manual outline of stone and computer SA calculation; and (4) automated 3D volume calculation using specific software. Primary outcome was stone-free status (SFS) at discharge. Secondary outcomes included operative time and the need for an ancillary procedure. Regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive value of each method. Results: Of 313 included patients, 69.6% were stone free at discharge. All measures of stone burden were independent predictors of SFS [OR and 95% CI of 1.027 (1.014, 1.040), 1.481 (1.180, 1.858), 1.736 (1.266, 2.380), and 1.311 (1.127, 1.526), respectively] and demonstrated similar predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.630, 0.630, 0.627, and 0.638, respectively). Stone burden by any measure was an independent predictor of operative time and secondary procedure. Conclusions: We demonstrated that measuring stone burden by manual outline or automated 3D volume on reformatted CT images had no added value compared with orthogonal measurement for predicting outcomes after PCNL.

Background: Colorectal cancer remains a common cancer in the western world, with liver resection being the only potentially curative option for isolated colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). Cancer is a disease of aging, with the optimum management of elderly patients with CRCLM presenting an ongoing dilemma., Methods: We analysed the outcome of CRCLM using prospectively collected patient data from the multidisciplinary Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry, collected from July 2009 to July 2018 at 12 Australian hospitals., Results: Of 2742 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, liver-limited disease was present in 977 (36%) patients, of whom 338 (35%) underwent hepatic resection. Resection rates varied with age, including 186 (43%) of 428 patients aged 64 years and younger, 99 (40%) of 245 aged 65-75 years and 53 (17%) of 303 aged 76 and older (P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.9%. Median survival post resection also varied with age, 96 versus 89 versus 68 months (P < 0.001). In a separate analysis of the oldest patients, those aged over 80 years, where only 11% underwent resection, the median survival was 49 months., Conclusion: The operative mortality for patients undergoing liver resection at Australian hospitals is low. With advancing age, the rate of liver resection of CRCLM and the post-resection survival decline. However, excellent survival outcomes can be achieved in selected elderly patients., (© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Our aim was to investigate sebaceous differentiation in thymus tumours and to identify new actionable genomic alterations. To this end we screened 35 normal and 23 hyperplastic thymuses, 127 thymomas and 41 thymic carcinomas for the presence of sebaceous differentiation as defined by morphology and expression of adipophilin and androgen receptor (AR). One primary thymic carcinoma showed morphology of sebaceous carcinomas (keratinizing and foam cells, calcifications, giant cells), a strong expression of adipophilin and AR together with squamous markers. NGS revealed high-level amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). In thymuses and thymomas, no cells with sebaceous morphology were present. Occasionally, macrophages or epithelial cells showed adipophilin-positivity, however, without co-expression of AR. Thymic sebaceous carcinoma should be considered if a thymic carcinoma shows clear or foamy features. Testing for FGFR2 amplification might be warranted when searching for actionable genomic alterations in sebaceous carcinomas in the mediastinum and in other locations.

Background: Patients with oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (EAC) not showing early metabolic response (EMR) to chemotherapy have poorer survival and histological response rates <5%. We investigated whether tailoring neoadjuvant therapy can improve outcomes in these patients., Patients and Methods: Patients with resectable EAC were enrolled and randomised into two single-arm, multicentre phase II trials. After induction cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF), all were assessed by day 15 positron emission tomography (PET). Patients with an EMR [maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) ≥35% reduction from baseline to day 15 PET] received a second CF cycle then oesophagectomy. Non-responders were randomised 1 : 1 to two cycles of CF and docetaxel (DCF, n = 31) or DCF + 45 Gy radiotherapy (DCFRT, n = 35) then oesophagectomy. The primary end point was major histological response (<10% residual tumour) in the oesophagectomy specimen; secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional recurrence (LR)., Results: Of 124 patients recruited, major histological response was achieved in 3/45 (7%) with EMR, 6/30 (20%) DCF, and 22/35 (63%) DCFRT patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 12/45 (27%) EMR (CF), 13/31 (42%) DCF, and 25/35 (71%) DCFRT patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. LR by 3 years was seen in 5/45 (11%) EMR, 10/31 (32%) DCF, and 4/35 (11%) DCFRT patients. PFS [95% confidence interval (CI)] at 36 months was 47% (31% to 61%) for EMR, 29% (15% to 45%) for DCF, and 46% (29% to 61%) for DCFRT patients. OS (95% CI) at 60 months was 53% (37% to 67%) for EMR, 31% (16% to 48%) for DCF, and 46% (29% to 61%) for DCFRT patients., Conclusions: EMR is associated with favourable OS, PFS, and low LR. For non-responders, the addition of docetaxel augmented histological response rates, but OS, PFS, and LR remained inferior compared with responders. DCFRT improved histological response and PFS/LR outcomes, matching the EMR group. Early PET/CT has the potential to tailor therapy for patients not showing an early response to chemotherapy., Trial Registration: ACTRN12609000665235., (Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)