Search

Background: The term "flagellate erythema" after bleomycin therapy was described as bleomycin-induced linear hyperpigmentation. Since then, this pattern has not been related to any other chemotherapeutic regimen., Observation: We report a rare patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who developed "flagellate dermatitis" induced by bendamustine., Conclusion: Chemotherapy induced "Flagellate Dermatitis" is a rare finding reported only after bleomycin therapy. We describe the first case with this characteristic eruption pattern after administration of bendamustine.

Background: The purpose of this phase Ib clinical trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PR-104 a bioreductive pre-prodrug given in combination with gemcitabine or docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours., Methods: PR-104 was administered as a one-hour intravenous infusion combined with docetaxel 60 to 75 mg/m2 on day one given with or without granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on day two or administrated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days one and eight, of a 21-day treatment cycle. Patients were assigned to one of ten PR-104 dose-levels ranging from 140 to 1100 mg/m2 and to one of four combination groups. Pharmacokinetic studies were scheduled for cycle one day one and 18F fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) positron emission tomography hypoxia imaging at baseline and after two treatment cycles., Results: Forty two patients (23 females and 19 males) were enrolled with ages ranging from 27 to 85 years and a wide range of advanced solid tumours. The MTD of PR-104 was 140 mg/m2 when combined with gemcitabine, 200 mg/m2 when combined with docetaxel 60 mg/m2, 770 mg/m2 when combined with docetaxel 60 mg/m2 plus G-CSF and ≥770 mg/m2 when combined with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus G-CSF. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) across all four combination settings included thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever and fatigue. Other common grade three or four toxicities included neutropenia, anaemia and leukopenia. Four patients had partial tumour response. Eleven of 17 patients undergoing FMISO scans showed tumour hypoxia at baseline. Plasma pharmacokinetics of PR-104, its metabolites (alcohol PR-104A, glucuronide PR-104G, hydroxylamine PR-104H, amine PR-104M and semi-mustard PR-104S1), docetaxel and gemcitabine were similar to that of their single agents., Conclusions: Combination of PR-104 with docetaxel or gemcitabine caused dose-limiting and severe myelotoxicity, but prophylactic G-CSF allowed PR-104 dose escalation with docetaxel. Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia prohibited further evaluation of the PR104-gemcitabine combination. A recommended dose was identified for phase II trials of PR-104 of 770 mg/m2 combined with docetaxel 60 to 75 mg/m2 both given on day one of a 21-day treatment cycle supported by prophylactic G-CSF (NCT00459836).

We analyzed the safety and efficacy of rituximab plus bendamustine (R-B) in elderly and frail patients with aggressive B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma (a-B-NHL). Few reports have as yet reported on R-B in a-B-NHL, albeit its value for indolent lymphoma vs. R-CHOP has impressively been shown. We assessed 20 consecutive patients with a-B-NHL receiving R-B as first-line or relapse treatment after (R)-CHOP in our department. Besides patient- and lymphoma-specific characteristics, comorbidity indices were determined. The median patient age was 72 years (51-86), the median Karnofsky performance status was 55 % (40-90 %), and according to the international prognostic index, 15 had high-intermediate or high-risk disease. The comorbidity indices revealed a median Kaplan-Feinstein index of 3 (range 1-3), Charlson comorbidity index of 4 (range 0-9), hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index of 3 (range 0-11), and Freiburg comorbidity index of 2 (range 0-2). Moreover, eight patients had echocardiographic and laboratory signs of cardiac insufficiency, all leading to R-B rather than R-CHOP treatment. The overall response rate was 55 %, with complete response and partial response rates of 20 and 35 %, respectively. In our frail and elderly patient cohort, R-B therapy was well-tolerated. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 8.3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 2.8--not reached [n.r.]) and 19.4 months (95 % CI, 4.6--n.r.), respectively. We conclude that R-B is a feasible and safe therapy option in a-B-NHL patients not qualifying for R-CHOP but needs to be further assessed in larger subsequent trials, these currently being under way.

Bendamustine (Levact®) is an alkylating agent consisting of three structural elements: a 2-chloroethylamine alkylating group; a butyric acid side chain; and a benzimidazole ring. Although its precise mechanism of action is as yet unknown, it appears to exert its antineoplastic effects via a different mechanism to those of other alkylating agents. This article reviews the utilization of intravenous bendamustine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM), focusing on indications for which the agent is approved in the EU. As monotherapy, bendamustine was effective in the first-line treatment of adults with CLL, significantly prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and improving the overall response (OR) rate after a median duration of follow-up of 35 months compared with chlorambucil in a randomized, open-label, multinational, phase III study. PFS and the OR rate were at least 2-fold greater with bendamustine than with chlorambucil when data from the overall patient population were stratified by Binet stage. In the treatment of adults with rituximab-refractory indolent NHL, monotherapy with bendamustine was efficacious, with an OR achieved by at least three-quarters of patients in two noncomparative multicentre studies. Patients with follicular histology or those who had responded or were refractory to their previous chemotherapy regimen (including alkylator therapy) also appeared to respond to bendamustine monotherapy. Front-line combination therapy with bendamustine plus prednisone was significantly more effective than combination therapy with melphalan plus prednisone in prolonging the time to treatment failure, according to a randomized, open-label multicentre, phase III study in adults with MM. Moreover, the benefits of bendamustine plus prednisone appeared to be maintained beyond 30 months, with a retrospective calculation of PFS demonstrating a borderline statistical significance in favour of bendamustine plus prednisone over melphalan plus prednisone. The tolerability profile of bendamustine in adults with CLL, indolent NHL or MM was mostly consistent with the known toxicities of the agent, with adverse events often managed with dose modifications. Although further data are required to fully establish the comparative efficacy of intravenous bendamustine in the management of CLL, rituximab-refractory indolent NHL or MM, it appears to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of currently available therapies for these haematological malignancies.

The efficacy of bendamustine versus chlorambucil in a phase III trial of previously untreated patients with Binet stage B/C chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) was re-evaluated after a median observation time of 54 months in May 2010. Overall survival (OS) was analysed for the first time. At follow-up, investigator-assessed complete response (CR) rate (21·0% vs 10·8%), median progression-free survival (21·2 vs 8·8 months; P < 0·0001; hazard ratio 2·83) and time to next treatment (31·7 vs 10·1 months; P < 0·0001) were improved for bendamustine over chlorambucil. OS was not different between groups for all patients or those ≤65 years, >65 years, responders and non-responders. However, patients with objective response or a CR experienced a significantly longer OS than non-responders or those without a CR. Significantly more patients on chlorambucil progressed to second/further lines of treatment compared with those on bendamustine (78·3% vs 63·6%; P = 0·004). The benefits of bendamustine over chlorambucil were achieved without reducing quality of life. In conclusion, bendamustine is significantly more effective than chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL patients, with the achievement of a CR or objective response appearing to prolong OS. Bendamustine should be considered as a preferred first-line option over chlorambucil for CLL patients ineligible for fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Purpose: We investigated the safety and efficacy of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Patients and Methods: In all, 117 patients, age 34 to 78 years, 46.2% of patients at Binet stage C, and 25.6% of patients age 70 years or older received BR chemoimmunotherapy for first-line treatment of CLL. Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 combined with 375 mg/m(2) rituximab on day 0 of the first course and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 during subsequent courses for up to six courses., Results: Overall response rate was 88.0% (95% CI, 80.7% to 100.0%) with a complete response rate of 23.1% and a partial response rate of 64.9%. Ninety percent of patients with del(11q), 94.7% with trisomy 12, 37.5% with del(17p), and 89.4% with unmutated IGHV status responded to treatment. After a median observation time of 27.0 months, median event-free survival was 33.9 months, and 90.5% of patients were alive. Grade 3 or 4 severe infections occurred in 7.7% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events for neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were documented in 19.7%, 22.2%, and 19.7% of patients, respectively., Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy with BR is effective and safe in patients with previously untreated CLL.

When caring for a patient with TLS, astute nursing care is required for positive patient outcomes. Assessments and monitoring are required for prompt management of complications and patient safety. Because of the skilled nursing care that Mr. B received, along with supportive medications and hydration, his renal function improved, with increased urine output, normalization of electrolytes, and return of his appetite.

Purpose: Renal failure is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) and, if present at diagnosis, a considerable risk factor for outcome. Treatment with chemotherapy and/or new agents may result in recovery of renal function in up to 50 % of patients. The window of opportunity to reverse renal impairment is, however, rather small, making an immediate and highly active treatment strategy mandatory. Bortezomib as well as bendamustine has been demonstrated to be potent drugs in the treatment of MM., Methods: A total of 18 patients with newly diagnosed/untreated MM and renal insufficiency (GFR < 35 ml/min) were treated with bendamustine, prednisone, and bortezomib (BPV)., Results: The majority of them (n = 15; 83 %) responded after at least one cycle of chemotherapy with three sCR, five nCR, five VGPR, and two PR. With a median follow-up of 17 months, PFS at 18 months was 57 % and OS was 61 %. The myeloma protein decreased rapidly, reaching the best response after the first cycle in four and after the second cycle in additional seven patients. Thirteen patients (72 %) improved their renal function after treatment., Conclusion: We conclude that the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine, and prednisone is effective and well tolerated in patients with a newly diagnosed MM and renal failure.

The efficacy of bendamustine (50 mg/m², days 1-3) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m², day 1), every 28 days for up to four courses, was evaluated in a Phase II multicentre trial enrolling 59 patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Major toxicities were grade 3/4 leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and infections in 42%, 12% and 12% of patients, respectively. Complete and partial response was achieved in 5/59 and 25/29 patients, respectively (overall response rate, 51%). Median time to progression was 22 months (range 1-49 + ) and median survival 27 months (range 0-49 + ). The combination of bendamustine and mitoxantrone is an active regime in relapsed or refractory CLL., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Bendamustine is approved in the United States for relapsed indolent lymphoma. However, it has not been widely studied in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with MCL who were treated with bendamustine at three centers. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Thirty patients with MCL received bendamustine, 25 for relapsed disease. After a median follow-up of 12 months, there were 15 complete responses (CRs) with an ORR of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-97%). Factors significantly associated with longer survival were achieving a CR and classical (versus blastic) variant of MCL. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23%, 3% and 20%, respectively. There was one case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy 10 months after therapy completion. Bendamustine in combination with rituximab demonstrated a high response rate in this study of patients with predominantly relapsed MCL.

Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine-like benzimidazole group. The aim of this study was to collect all the Italian experiences with this drug in order to evaluate the results in term of response to therapy and toxicities. We analyzed lymphoma patients treated in 24 Italian haematological centres with bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. One hundred seventy-five relapsed or refractory lymphoma patients were enrolled. The median age was 69 years (range 26-87). Seventy-nine patients were relapsed, 35 were refractory and 61 presented a progressive disease after partial response. The diagnoses were 60 indolent non-follicular lymphomas, 34 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, 48 follicular lymphomas, 30 mantle cell lymphomas and three peripheral T-cell lymphomas. All patients were evaluable for response: 52 (29%) with complete remission, 72 (43%) with partial response with an overall response rate of 71%, and 51 non-responders. With a median observation period of 10 months (1-43), 70% of patients are alive. In summary, this retrospective study shows that treatment with bendamustine alone or in combination with rituximab is a safe and effective regimen in a subset of multi-resistant patients.

Background: Bendamustine is indicated for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and rituximab refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical trials have reported a 25% incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in patients receiving bendamustine. While these reactions are well documented, there is no consensus on the optimal premedication regimen for the prevention of these adverse effects. At our center, we utilize a regimen of ondansetron 16 mg orally and dexamethasone 10 mg IV push prior to each infusion of bendamustine. This report describes our experience with our current premedication regimen with regard to IRRs and the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive patients receiving bendamustine infusions at our institute from June 2008 to June 2010 to determine the incidence of IRRs and FN. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of IRRs. Secondary objectives included incidence of FN and hospital admission rate., Results: A total of 478 infusions of bendamustine were administered to 73 consecutive patients. The median patient age was 69 years. IRRs affected 19% of our population, and 10.9% experienced FN. Notably, all IRRs were attributed to rituximab infusions and no patients experienced an IRR when receiving bendamustine alone. This compares favorably to the initial reported IRRs of 25% with bendamustine alone., Conclusions: Based on our experience with bendamustine, ondansetron and dexamethasone provide a safe and effective prevention of IRRs associated with bendamustine. By avoiding the use of other premedications, the likelihood of additional complications or adverse affects can be minimized.

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often has an extended disease course. With a median age at diagnosis of 72 years, newer treatment options with less toxicity than standard nucleoside analogue-based regimens are needed. Historically, few therapy options are available once CLL has become refractory to nucleoside analogues. Bendamustine has emerged as a feasible therapy for older and less fit CLL patients, with clinical efficacy in previously untreated and refractory CLL., Areas Covered: This paper reviews several of the pivotal clinical trials that established the clinical activity of bendamustine in previously untreated and relapsed/refractory CLL. The toxicity profile of bendamustine, primarily myelosuppression and infections, is reviewed and compared across different CLL populations. A review of the clinical data focuses on potential explanations for differences in response rates and duration of remission reported across studies and how this may impact the development of therapies for CLL., Expert Opinion: Bendamustine is a valuable new agent for the management of CLL. Ongoing clinical trials are comparing bendamustine with standard CLL regimens in untreated disease, and investigating bendamustine combinations with novel targeted therapies and monoclonal antibodies. These studies will help to define the optimal role for bendamustine in CLL management.

History and Clinical Findings: An 83-year old woman had been treated with bendamustin and rituximab for prolymphocytic leukemia. Two weeks after cycle 6 of chemotherapy, signs and symptoms of a severe hepatitis occurred., Investigations: Highly elevated values for AST (1353 U/l) and bilirubin (27.8 mg/dl), impaired coagulation parameters (INR 1,68) and the detection of ascites led to the diagnosis of an impending liver failure induced by reactivation of a hitherto unknown hepatitis B (HBs antigen pos., HBe antigen pos., anti HBc IgG pos., HBV DNA 1,65 Mio copies/ml)., Treatment and Course: After an immediately started treatment with entecavir (0.5 mg/d po), symptoms and laboratory parameters rapidly improved. 4 months later liver chemistry was completely normal and HBV DNA was negative. After 8 months, a seroconversion to anti HBs was noted., Conclusion: In single cases, life threatening complications of chemotherapy induced reactivation of hepatitis B may be successfully treated by potent and stabile nucleosidanalogs., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Unlabelled: A phase I-II study of bendamustine fractionated twice daily schedule for 4 days identified 75 mg/m(2) intravenously(IV) twice daily for 4 days as a phase II study schedule., Background: Alkylating agents have shown activity in leukemia. Bendamustine, an active alkylating agent in lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, was given in a fractionated twice daily schedule for 4 days to patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD)., Patients and Methods: Adults with refractory acute leukemia or high-risk MDS were treated with bendamustine at a starting dose of 50 mg/m(2) IV over 1-2 hours twice daily for 4 days. Dose escalations were by 25 mg/m(2) in the 1st 3 levels. The study used the 3 + 3 design., Results: A total of 25 patients were treated. Their median age was 57 years; the median salvage number was 3. Grade 2 creatinine elevations were observed in 1 of 6 patients at the 50 mg/m(2) dose, in 2 of 13 patients at the 75 mg/m(2) dose, and in 3 of 6 patients at the 100 mg/m(2) dose. This was considered significant, even though DLT was not reached. One patient achieved marrow complete remission. Significant reductions of marrow blasts (50% or more) were observed in 6 of 25 patients (24%)., Conclusion: Bendamustine fractionated dose level of 100 mg/m(2) IV twice daily for 4 days (800 mg/m(2) per course) was associated with Grade 2 renal toxicity. The proposed phase II schedule is 75 mg/m(2) IV twice daily for 4 days. Future studies should evaluate this schedule in less heavily treated patients., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bendamustine is a alkylating agent with a purine-like benzamidazole ring currently approved in Europe for indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma. Our aim was to analyze retrospectively the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine in NHL and CLL in Spain in the bendamustine Compassionate Use Program. Patients with relapsed/refractory NHL or CLL were eligible. Any regimen containing bendamustine was eligible. 109 patients were included from 22 institutions. Forty-nine patients had indolent NHL, 18 aggressive NHL and 42 CLL, being 44 patients (40%) refractory to previous treatment. 63% of patients had adverse events grade 3-4, mainly hematological. Overall response rate (ORR) was 66%, complete responses 30%. ORR observed in refractory patients was 45%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months. Outcome was influenced by histology, number of previous treatments, resistance to previous chemotherapy and type of response achieved with bendamustine. Alone or in combination, bendamustine shows a meaningful clinical antitumor activity in patients with relapsed or refractory NHL or CLL, with an acceptable toxicity profile., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This multicenter phase 1/2 trial investigated the combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in repeating 4-week cycles as treatment for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Phase 1 established maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Phase 2 assessed overall response rate at the MTD. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 29 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range, 38-80 years). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-6). MTD was bendamustine 75 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 2), lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21), and dexamethasone 40 mg (weekly) of a 28-day cycle. Partial response rate was 52%, with very good partial response achieved in 24%, and minimal response in an additional 24% of patients. Median follow-up was 13 months; median OS has not been reached. One-year OS is 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-99%). Median PFS is 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.7-9.4 months) with one-year PFS of 20% (95% CI, 6%-41%). Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and fatigue. This first phase 1/2 trial testing bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as treatment of relapsed refractory MM was feasible and highly active. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01042704.

A 72-year-old woman presented with dyspnea and lower extremity edema. Extreme lymphocytosis, cytopenia, and splenomegaly were found, and she was diagnosed with B-prolymphocytic leukemia. Following the first dose of therapy with bendamustine, the patient developed severe generalized maculopapular rash, which subsequently progressed to exuberant, non-blanching palpable purpura with hemorrhagic plaques suspicious for leukocytoclastic vasculitis. These events coincided with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, but there were no clinical symptoms of infection. Skin punch biopsy revealed perivascular and diffuse upper dermal lymphocytic infiltrate with eosinophils and marked erythrocyte extravasation consistent with a purpuric drug exanthem. The patient was treated with steroids, with complete resolution of the findings. This new form of cutaneous toxicity of bendamustine is presented along with a review of previous experience with the drug.

Purpose: The objective of this trial was to evaluate safety and efficacy of bendamustine combined with rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Patients and Methods: Seventy-eight patients, including 22 patients with fludarabine-refractory disease (28.2%) and 14 patients (17.9%) with deletion of 17p, received BR chemoimmunotherapy. Bendamustine was administered at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 combined with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 0 of the first course and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 during subsequent courses for up to six courses., Results: On the basis of intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 59.0% (95% CI, 47.3% to 70.0%). Complete response, partial response, and nodular partial response were achieved in 9.0%, 47.4%, and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 45.5% in fludarabine-refractory patients and 60.5% in fludarabine-sensitive patients. Among genetic subgroups, 92.3% of patients with del(11q), 100% with trisomy 12, 7.1% with del(17p), and 58.7% with unmutated IGHV status responded to treatment. After a median follow-up time of 24 months, the median event-free survival was 14.7 months. Severe infections occurred in 12.8% of patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were documented in 23.1%, 28.2%, and 16.6% of patients, respectively., Conclusion: Chemoimmunotherapy with BR is effective and safe in patients with relapsed CLL and has notable activity in fludarabine-refractory disease. Major but tolerable toxicities were myelosuppression and infections. These promising results encouraged us to initiate a further phase II trial evaluating the BR regimen in patients with previously untreated CLL.

Although bendamustine plus rituximab has demonstrated efficacy in indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL), data for this combination in aggressive B-NHL are extremely limited. The present dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine hydrochloride in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory, CD20-positive, aggressive B-NHL. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) , i.v., on Day 1 and bendamustine at either 90 (Cohort 1) or 120 mg/m(2) (Cohort 2), i.v., on Days 2 and 3 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AE), the overall response rate (ORR), and pharmacokinetic parameters. Nine patients received rituximab plus bendamustine: three in Cohort 1 and six in Cohort 2. Histologies included diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 5), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 2), and transformed lymphoma (n = 2). No DLT was observed at either dose level. Grade 3/4 hematologic AE included lymphocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and neutropenia (n = 9 each; 100%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2; 22%). No Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal AE were reported. The ORR was 33% (one partial response) in Cohort 1 and 100% (five complete and one partial response) in Cohort 2. The maximum drug concentration and area under the blood concentration-time curve for bendamustine increased dose dependently, with time to maximum blood concentration = 1.0 h in both cohorts; these pharmacokinetic data were similar to those reported previously for single-agent bendamustine in patients with indolent B-NHL. In conclusion, bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) plus rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was feasible and generally well tolerated, with promising efficacy in relapsed or refractory aggressive B-NHL., (© 2011 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Rituximab plus combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is widely recommended for the treatment of aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, there is very little information regarding the management of elderly patients., Patients and Methods: We initiated a phase II study of first-line treatment with rituximab and bendamustine in elderly patients (≥80 years) with aggressive B-cell lymphomas who were not eligible for R-CHOP or who did not agree to aggressive treatment. The treatment decision on eligibility for R-CHOP was left to discretion of the physicians., Results: Fourteen patients with a median age of 85 years (range 80-95 years) were included. The age-adjusted international prognostic index was zero in five patients, one in three patients, and two in six patients. Thirteen patients were assessable for response. Seven patients (54%) had a complete response, two (15%) a partial response, and four (31%) progressive disease. The median overall survival was 7.7 months, and the median progression-free survival 7.7 months; however, six patients (43%) were alive without disease at 20-72 months from the start of treatment. Major toxicity was neutropenia (17% grade 3 and 6% grade 4). All other grade 3 and 4 hematotoxicities and non-hematological toxic effects ranged between 2% and 11%, Conclusions: Because of its efficacy and low toxicity, bendamustine in combination with rituximab may be an alternative treatment for aggressive lymphomas in old patients not eligible for R-CHOP. These results, however, need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Purpose: PR-104 is activated by reductases under hypoxia or by aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) to form cytotoxic nitrogen mustards. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) displays extensive hypoxia and expresses AKR1C3. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of PR-104 plus sorafenib in HCC., Methods: Patients with advanced-stage HCC, Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, and adequate organ function, were assigned to dose escalating cohorts of monthly PR-104 in combination with twice daily sorafenib. The plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of PR-104 and its metabolites were evaluated., Results: Fourteen (11 men, 3 women) HCC patients: median age 60 years, ECOG 0-1, received PR-104 at two dose levels plus sorafenib. Six patients were treated at starting cohort of 770 mg/m(2). In view of one DLT of febrile neutropenia and prolonged thrombocytopenia, a lower PR-104 dose cohort (550 mg/m(2)) was added and accrued 8 patients. One patient had a partial response and three had stable disease of ≥8 weeks in the 770 mg/m(2) cohort. Three patients at the 550 mg/m(2) had stable disease. There were no differences in PK of PR-104 or its metabolites with or without sorafenib, but the PR-104A AUC was twofold higher (P < 0.003) than in previous phase I studies at equivalent dose., Conclusions: PR-104 plus sorafenib was poorly tolerated in patients with advanced HCC, possibly because of compromised clearance of PR-104A in this patient population. Thrombocytopenia mainly and neutropenia were the most clinically significant toxicities and led to discontinuation of the study. PR-104 plus sorafenib is unlikely to be suitable for development in this setting.

To retrospectively assess the efficacy of bendamustine alone and with rituximab (R-B), 109 patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) were enrolled in 24 Italian centres. The median age was 66 years (range 39-85). Forty-three percent of patients had relapsed and 57% were resistant (median previous therapies = 3; range 1-8). Twenty-two patients received bendamustine alone and 87 patients received R-B (median B dosage: 100 mg/m(2) per day, range 90-130 mg/m(2) per day). The overall response rate was 69·6% (complete response 28·6%; partial response 41%), and was significantly higher in patients treated with R-B (P = 0·014) and in those responsive to the previous treatment (P=0·04). After a median follow-up of 7·9 months (range 1-148), the median progression-free survival was 16 months and the median duration of response was 13 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 16·8 months for the whole cohort; patients not responding to the treatment had a significantly worse outcome than those who attained a response (P = 0·0001). In multivariate analysis, only resistant disease status at start of bendamustine treatment (HR 3·2, 95% CI 1·4-7·3, P = 0·006) had an independent prognostic value for OS. Toxicity was manageable and mostly haematological. In conclusion, in our experience R-B was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for relapsed/refractory CLL patients, producing a remarkable high CR rate and mild toxicity., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: The objective was to demonstrate feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of routine clinical use of the bendamustine/rituximab combination in lymphoproliferative diseases., Patients and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 71 patients treated with bendamustine/rituximab combination in Tyrol/Austria. Toxicities, therapeutic response, and survival outcome in the various lymphoma entities were analyzed., Results: There was considerable hematotoxicity, with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of grade 3 or 4 in 33% and 18%, respectively. Interestingly, severe infection of grade 3 or 4 was observed in a remarkable percentage of patients with aggressive lymphoma and CLL (21% and 28%, respectively) but not in indolent lymphoma (p = 0.027). Overall, the therapeutic efficacy of bendamustine/rituximab was encouraging. In CLL, an overall response rate (ORR) of 65% was achieved. Notably, in the seven previously untreated CLL patients, ORR was 86%. The therapy was effective across all FISH-cytogenetic subgroups, except for the five patients harboring 17p deletion with unfavorable prognosis (PFS 2.7 months, OS 9.3 months). In indolent lymphoma (n = 25), the bendamustine-rituximab combination induced a remarkable therapeutic effect (ORR 96%, median PFS and OS not reached). In aggressive lymphoma (n = 20), ORR was 50%; in International Prognostic Index high-risk patients (4 or 5 risk factors, n = 10), ORR was only 20%, significantly inferior than in low/intermediate risk patients (ORR 70%; p = 0.025)., Conclusions: In the routine setting aside clinical studies, bendamustine/rituximab therapy resulted in marked clinical responses, especially in CLL and indolent lymphoma. In aggressive lymphoma, the combination of bendamustine and rituximab was effective in favorable risk patients.

Given the significant activity and tolerability of bendamustine, rituximab, and bortezomib in patients with relapsed indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and laboratory studies suggesting synergistic activity, we conducted a multicenter phase 2 study of the bendamustine/bortezomib/rituximab combination. Patients with relapsed or refractory indolent and mantle cell lymphoma with adequate organ function were treated with bendamustine 90 mg/m² days 1 and 4; rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1, and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² days 1, 4, 8, 11. Six 28-day cycles were planned. Thirty patients (7 with mantle cell lymphoma) were enrolled and treated. Eight patients experienced serious adverse events, including one event of grade 5 sepsis. Common nonhematologic adverse events were generally grade 1 or grade 2 and included nausea (50%), neuropathy (47%), fatigue (47%), constipation (40%), and fever (40%). Of 29 patients evaluable for efficacy, 24 (83%) achieved an objective response (including 15 with complete response). With median follow-up of 24 months, 2-year progression-free survival is 47% (95% confidence interval, 25%-69%). On the basis of these promising results, the US cooperative groups have initiated randomized trials to evaluate this regimen in follicular and mantle cell lymphoma. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00547534.

Background and Objectives: Bendamustine has been recently approved for the treatment of low-grade lymphoproliferative disorders. There is little data on the effectiveness or toxicity of this drug outside the trial setting. This is the first report on the use of bendamustine from the Indian subcontinent., Settings and Design: Retrospective descriptive analysis of response and side effects of bendamustine in eight patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and eight patients with follicular lymphoma., Methods: Data was collated from a review of case records. We examined any association between side effects and clinical parameters., Results: The median age of patients was 52 years and three-quarters had received prior treatment with alkylators or fludarabine. Three different protocols of bendamustine were used (single agent, in combination with rituximab or in combination with vincristine and prednisolone). The overall response rate was 80% (47% complete response, 33% partial response, and 20% progressive disease). The drug was well tolerated with very few grade 3/4 toxicities. More than half the patients (9/16) developed a characteristic erythematous, papular skin rash that resolved after completion of chemotherapy., Conclusion: Bendamustine is a safe and useful addition to the drug arsenal against lymphoproliferative disorders. A peculiar skin rash was the commonest side effect noted in Indian patients treated with this drug.

B-cell malignancies, including B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), are the most common hematologic malignancies in the western world. Although excellent response rates are achieved with standard chemoimmunotherapy, patients often relapse and additional treatment is necessary. Bendamustine, a unique cytotoxic agent with alkylating and antimetabolite properties, has been used for decades in Germany for NHL, CLL and multiple myeloma. In 2008, bendamustine was approved by the US FDA for the treatment CLL and rituximab-refractory indolent B-cell NHL. The approval in NHL was based on the results of this multicenter, single-arm trial in which patients with rituximab-refractory indolent NHL received bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of each 21-day cycle for six to eight cycles. The primary end points were overall response rate and median duration of response, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival and the safety profile. Bendamustine demonstrated significant efficacy with an overall response rate of 75% median duration of response of 9.2 months and median progression-free survival of 9.3 months, as well as easy tolerability. The most common toxicities were nausea, myelosuppression and infection. These results confirm bendamustine's role in rituximab-refractory indolent B-cell NHL.

Background: Although initially responsive to therapy, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are generally incurable. Therefore, active and tolerable treatments for patients with relapsed or refractory disease are needed. Bendamustine, a mechlorethamine alkylator with novel mechanisms of action, is approved in the United States for rituximab-refractory indolent B-cell NHL., Patients and Methods: Data from 2 North American multicenter studies with similar design, enrollment, and response criteria were pooled to evaluate safety and durability of response. Bendamustine was administered at 120 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 every 21 days for 6-8 cycles. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety., Results: The studies enrolled 161 patients with a median of 2 previous chemotherapy regimens. Histologies included follicular (68%), small lymphocytic (20%), marginal zone (11%), and lymphoplasmacytic (1%) lymphoma. Sixty patients (34.1%) were refractory to their last chemotherapy, 53 (30.1%) were alkylating agent refractory. Overall response rate was 76% with 23% complete remissions (CRs) and unconfirmed CR (CRu). The median follow-up was 25.3 months (range, 24-27.8 months) and DOR was 10 months (range, 8.3-14 months). At 1 and 2 years, 45% and 23% of responders continued to respond. Among 127 patients previously treated with alkylators, ORR was 88% (28% CR/CRu) in responsive and 59% (12% CR/CRu) in refractory patients. Fifty opportunistic infections were reported in 48 patients. Second malignancies occurred in 9 patients (5.6%; 5 myelodysplastic syndromes, 2 acute myelogenous leukemia, 1 chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and 1 squamous cell carcinoma)., Conclusion: Bendamustine induces durable responses with acceptable long-term safety in rituximab-refractory indolent NHL.

Purpose: The pharmacokinetic profiles of bendamustine and active metabolites were defined in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and supported understanding of exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety., Methods: Bendamustine was administered as a 60-min 120 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of six 21-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic models were developed, with covariate assessment. Correlations between bendamustine exposure and responder status or occurrence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were examined., Results: Following a single dose of bendamustine HCl, concentrations declined in a triphasic manner, with rapid distribution, intermediate, and slow terminal phases. The intermediate t (1/2) (40 min) was considered the pharmacologically relevant (beta elimination) t (1/2) since the initial phases accounted for 99% of the AUC. Age, sex, mild/moderate renal, or mild liver impairment did not alter pharmacokinetics. Metabolite concentrations were low relative to parent. No correlation was observed between exposure and safety or efficacy measures because of the limited range of exposures after 120 mg/m(2) administration, except bendamustine C (max) was a significant (P value = 0.013) predictor of the probability of nausea in patients, most of whom were pretreated with antiemetics., Conclusions: The BSA-based dosing regimen for bendamustine achieved the targeted exposure and was associated with a high incidence of therapeutic response. Given the short t (1/2) and low concentrations of bendamustine observed by 12 h after dosing, the single-dose profile for bendamustine described by these analyses is expected to be representative of the multiple-dose profile. The occurrence of nausea was significantly related to bendamustine exposure, with the probability of nausea increasing as bendamustine C (max) increases.

Bendamustine (bendamustine hydrochloride) is an alkylating agent indicated in several countries for the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). While the precise mechanism of action of bendamustine is as yet unknown, it has limited cross resistance to other alkylating agents and appears to exert its antineoplastic effects via a different mechanism to that of other alkylating agents. Bendamustine monotherapy was effective in treatment-refractory (including rituximab-refractory) indolent NHL or MCL. Moreover, bendamustine-based combination treatment was at least as effective as cyclophosphamide-based treatment, and bendamustine plus rituximab was at least as effective as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine plus prednisone (CHOP) plus rituximab, as first-line therapy in patients with indolent NHL or MCL. Treatment-refractory disease also appeared to respond favourably to bendamustine-containing combination treatment. In general, bendamustine was associated with a high overall response rate and a durable response. The most common adverse events associated with bendamustine were haematological or gastrointestinal in nature, and most were of mild to moderate severity. Regimens that included bendamustine were also associated with a very low rate of alopecia compared with regimens that included other antineoplastic drugs. In conclusion, bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent, which in clinical trials has demonstrated consistent efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with indolent NHL or MCL. It may be a particularly useful treatment option in patients with rituximab-refractory disease, but has also demonstrated efficacy as part of a first-line combination treatment. While further research is necessary to firmly establish the best place for bendamustine in the management of indolent NHL and MCL, it is a valuable addition to the pool of available treatments for these diseases.

Bendamustine is a cytotoxic agent with a novel mechanism of action. This phase I, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) without major organ dysfunction. Bendamustine 90 or 120 mg/m(2) (dose escalation) was administered intravenously over 60 min on days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks for up to three cycles. Nine patients (eight indolent B-NHL and one MCL) received per-protocol treatment, three at 90 mg/m(2) and six at 120 mg/m(2) . No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; thus, the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (33%) and leukopenia (33%). Non-hematologic toxicities were grade 1/2 and included gastrointestinal events and fatigue. Peak plasma concentrations of bendamustine occurred near the end of infusion in both dose groups and were equivalent to therapeutic concentrations observed in vitro. Bendamustine was rapidly eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life (t(1/2) ) of 29 min. Plasma concentrations of active metabolites M3 and M4 were approximately 4 and <1% of the plasma concentration of the parent molecule, with t(1/2) of 42 and 33 min, respectively. Two unconfirmed complete responses and six partial responses were observed for an overall response rate (ORR) of 89%. The recommended dose for this schedule in phase II trials is 120 mg/m(2) . The acceptable safety profile and high ORR warrant further investigation of bendamustine in relapsed or refractory indolent B-NHL and MCL., (© 2010 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Bendamustine is a unique cytotoxic agent that has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs). In this multicenter phase II trial, the efficacy and safety of bendamustine were evaluated in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-NHL or mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients received bendamustine (120 mg/m(2) ) on days 1-2 of a 21-day cycle, for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by an extramural committee according to International Workshop Response Criteria (IWRC). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, ORR according to Revised Response Criteria (revised RC), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Fifty-eight patients with indolent B-NHL and 11 with MCL were enrolled. By IWRC, bendamustine produced an ORR of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-97%; 90% and 100% in patients with indolent B-NHL and MCL, respectively), with a CR rate of 67% (95% CI, 54-78%). ORR and CR rates according to revised RC were 93% (95% CI, 84-98%) and 57% (95% CI, 44-68%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 12.6 months, median PFS had not been reached. Estimated PFS rates at 1 year were 70% and 90% among indolent B-NHL and MCL patients, respectively. Bendamustine was generally well tolerated. Reversible myelosuppression, including grade 3/4 leukopenia (65%) and neutropenia (72%), was the most clinically significant toxicity observed. Common non-hematologic toxicities included mild gastrointestinal events and fatigue. These results demonstrate the high efficacy and tolerability of single-agent bendamustine in relapsed patients with indolent B-NHL or MCL histologies., (© 2010 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Bendamustine (Treanda(®); Pharmachemie BV, The Netherlands for Cephalon, Inc., PA, USA) is a unique cytotoxic agent with both alkylating and antimetabolite properties. A growing body of evidence demonstrates its efficacy in a number of hematologic malignancies, and as such, it has been US FDA approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has not responded to, or progressed within 6 months of, a rituximab-based regimen. Bendamustine has efficacy both as a single agent as well as in combination with other chemotherapeutics and immunotherapeutics. Here, we will discuss in the detail the molecular properties, clinical efficacy and safety profile of bendamustine.

Background: Bendamustine (Treanda, Ribomustin) is a water-soluble, bifunctional chemotherapeutic agent that also has potential antimetabolite properties and only partial cross-resistance with other alkylators. Designed in 1963 and re-discovered in 1990s, this drug's unique mechanism of action and favorable side-effect profile promise a major role in the management of lymphoproliferative disorders. Bendamustine has been designated as an orphan drug in the United States, conferring prolonged market exclusivity., Objective: This article provides a comprehensive review of the data on efficacy and toxicity from trials investigating the use of bendamustine for the treatment of lymphoproliferative neoplasms. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pre-clinical studies with bendamustine are also reviewed., Methods: MEDLINE and Pubmed databases (1970-2010) were searched using the terms bendamustine, bendamustin, Treanda, Ribomustin, SDX-105, IMET-3393, and Cytostasan. All relevant articles were reviewed and references screened for additional articles. The databases of the American Society of Hematology (2004-2009) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1995-2009) were also searched for relevant abstracts., Results: Bendamustine induces a remission in more than three-fourths of patients with rituximab-refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Combined with rituximab in vitro, bendamustine shows synergistic effects against various leukemia and lymphoma cell lines. Clinical trials supporting these results show that bendamustine plus rituximab is highly effective in patients with relapsed-refractory indolent lymphoma, inducing remissions in 90% or more and a median progression-free survival of 23-24 months. Bendamustine has been reasonably well tolerated in clinical trials with low propensity to induce alopecia., Conclusions: Combination of bendamustine and rituximab has the potential to become a new standard first-line treatment option for patients with FL, MCL, and indolent lymphomas. Results of ongoing trials will help to further elucidate the optimal role of bendamustine in indolent NHL.

Bendamustine is an anti-neoplastic agent approved by the FDA in 2008 for use as monotherapy or in combination with other agents to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and progressed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In clinical trials and post-marketing safety reports administration of bendamustine with drugs that have known adverse reactions (i.e., allopurinol, rituximab) has been associated with rash, toxic skin reactions, and bullous exanthems. Here, we describe a patient with NHL who developed a severe cutaneous reaction associated with the administration of bendamustine. The severity of this drug eruption identifies an important adverse reaction with this drug and a potential cause for patient morbidity.

Purpose: The pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and dosage and administration of bendamustine and its use in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are reviewed., Summary: Bendamustine is an alkylating agent that has a unique, multifaceted mechanism of action. Compared with other alkylators, bendamustine produces more-extensive and long-lasting DNA damage. Bendamustine also inhibits cell-cycle checkpoints, leading to mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. Bendamustine is approved for the treatment of CLL and for indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-based regimen. In Phase II and III trials in patients with indolent NHL and CLL, bendamustine has demonstrated response rates of 67-84% as a single agent and median durations of response of 7-21 months. Additional clinical trials are examining bendamustine as a single agent and in combination therapy for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Adverse events associated with bendamustine are typically mild to moderate and can usually be managed with supportive care. Myelosuppression is the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Tumor lysis syndrome has been reported to occur in some patients, and preventive measures should be taken in at-risk patients. The dosage and administration differ for the treatment of NHL and CLL., Conclusion: Bendamustine is a well- tolerated and effective chemotherapeutic agent indicated for the treatment of rituximab-refractory, indolent NHL and CLL. It has demonstrated efficacy in patients whose disease is refractory to other therapies, including other alkylating agents.

Objective: In patients with multiple myeloma, bendamustine monotherapy is effective as 1st and 2nd line therapy. However, data for patients with advanced multiple myeloma is rare., Methods: In this retrospective analysis we have identified 39 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by means of case research, who have been treated at our institution with bendamustine as salvage therapy. After in median 2 lines of prior therapy (range: 1-5) patients received in median 3 (range: 1-10) cycles of bendamustine. Bendamustine dosage was 80-150 mg on day 1+2 of a monthly cycle. Bendamustine was administered as monotherapy in 39% of patients, whereas 61% received concomitant steroids., Results: Toxicity was mild to moderate. Response rates were as follows: 3% vgPR, 33% PR, 18% MR, 26% SD and 20% PD. The median event-free and overall survival were 7 and 17 months, respectively., Conclusions: In conclusion, in patients with advanced multiple myeloma bendamustine is effective and associated with mild toxicity. Therefore, the role of bendamustine in patients with multiple myeloma should be investigated in further clinical trials.

Background: Bendamustine hydrochloride is a novel alkylating agent. In this multicenter study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent bendamustine in patients with rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell lymphoma., Methods: Eligible patients (N = 100, ages 31-84 years) received bendamustine at a dose of 120 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 2 every 21 days for 6 to 8 cycles. Histologies included follicular (62%), small lymphocytic (21%), and marginal zone (16%) lymphomas. Patients had received a median of 2 previous regimens (range, 0-6 previous regimens), and 36%were refractory to their most recent chemotherapy regimen. Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Secondary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: An ORR of 75% (a 14% complete response rate, a 3% unconfirmed complete response rate, and a 58% partial response rate) was observed. The median DOR was 9.2 months, and median PFS was 9.3 months. Six deaths were considered to be possibly treatment related. Grade 3 or 4 (determined using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0.19]. reversible hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (61%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and anemia (10%). The most frequent nonhematologic adverse events (any grade) included nausea (77%), infection (69%), fatigue (64%), diarrhea (42%), vomiting (40%), pyrexia (36%), constipation (31%), and anorexia (24%)., Conclusions: Single-agent bendamustine produced a high rate of objective responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with recurrent, rituximab-refractory indolent B-cell lymphoma., (Copyright 2010 American Cancer Society.)

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a slow-growing hematologic malignancy and the most common type of leukemia in the western world. The lifetime risk for developing CLL is 1 in 216 men and women. Unfortunately, CLL is considered incurable with the chemotherapeutic agents available today. Bendamustine is a new agent that was recently added to the available regimens for the treatment of CLL. It was also recently approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Its mechanism of action is unknown, but it contains an alkylating group similar to that of other bifunctional alkylating agents such as chlorambucil, and it also contains a benzimidazole central ring thought to exhibit antipurine-like properties. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved bendamustine based on results from an international phase III study of CLL in which bendamustine was compared with chlorambucil in treatment-naïve patients. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the utility of bendamustine in combination with other agents for the treatment of CLL, as well as for other malignancies.

Objective: To report a case of probable bendamustine-related hemolytic anemia., Case Summary: A 64-year-old white female had recently received treatment with bendamustine for stage III follicular lymphoma. After her fourth cycle, she was admitted to an outside facility with severe right upper quadrant pain across her back and findings consistent with obstructive jaundice. She was found to have pancytopenia and elevations in total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and transaminase levels. A bone marrow biopsy showed no evidence of lymphoma and presence of megakaryocytes on 2 occasions. Upon transfer to West Virginia University Hospitals, her haptoglobin was found to be undetectable, total bilirubin 10.3 mg/dL (unconjugated bilirubin 4.9 mg/dL), reticulocyte count 21.4% (reticulocyte index > or = 2%), alkaline phosphatase 1125 U/L, and lactate dehydrogenase 421 U/L. The peripheral smear showed evidence of spherocytes and very rare schistocytes. Based on these findings, the woman was diagnosed with hemolytic anemia secondary to bendamustine exposure. She was started on prednisone 1 mg/kg (60 mg) daily and, soon after, her platelets and hemoglobin stabilized., Discussion: Drug-induced hemolytic anemia is an acquired or extrinsic process that results in antibody-mediated red blood cell destruction. The patient was not taking any medications commonly associated with hemolytic anemia; however, her laboratory test results were consistent with hemolytic anemia. Based on bendamustine's structural similarity to fludarabine and fludarabine's association with causing hemolytic anemia, we considered exposure to bendamustine to be the most likely contributory factor for her diagnosis. According to the Naranjo probability scale, a probable likelihood was reflected in bendamustine causing the hemolytic anemia., Conclusions: Continued monitoring of postmarketing data is necessary to correlate this occurrence of hemolytic anemia with bendamustine therapy.

Purpose: This randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine and chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with advanced (Binet stage B or C) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Patients and Methods: Patients (

We have evaluated all outpatients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who were treated with bendamustine/mitoxantrone/rituximab (BMR) between May 1999 and December 2008. Treatment consisted of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on day 1 + 2, Mitoxantrone 6 mg/m2 on day 1, and Rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 8, 15, 22 + 29. Thirty-nine patients (19 males, 20 females) received BMR with a median age of 69 years (46–81). Nineteen patients (49%) were above 70 years and 13 patients (33%) were 75 years or above. Performance score ranged between 0 and 2. The median number of previous therapies was 2 (1–4). Therapy was tolerated well with two observed therapy-associated hospitalizations. A reversible grade 3 or 4 hematotoxicity was seen in 30 patients (77%). Other reversible grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen in two patients (5%). The overall response rate was 92% (10% complete remission, 82% partial remission). Median time to next CLL-therapy was 13 months (0–69). We conclude that BMR is a short and effective outpatient chemoimmunotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, which can be used safely in elderly patients.

Background: Bendamustine is a drug with a favorable side effect spectrum and it offers a chance to overcome tumor resistance in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)., Patients and Methods: Bendamustine was given as flat dose with 200 mg at days 1 + 2 in MBC patients pretreated with 2-3 different chemotherapies. Therapy was repeated at day 28 or fully recovered neutrophils. After 2 treatment cycles, a tumor response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) catalogue., Results: 22 patients were evaluated for toxicity. 4 patients dropped out before the first tumor response evaluation; thus, 18 patients were evaluable for anticancer efficacy evaluation. 3/18 patients reached a partial remission (PR), 4 stable disease and 11 showed progression after 2 treatment cycles. The time to progression (TTP) was 5 months in patients with PR and 4 months in patients with no change (NC). In patients with progressive disease (PD), TTP was < 2 months. The main toxicities were nausea, weight loss and fatigue., Conclusions: Bendamustine can be given with a fixed flat dose, which simplifies the drug preparation. 2/5th of all treated patients responded to this therapy whereas bendamustine showed no anticancer effect in 3/5th of all patients. Bendamustine is definitely a drug with anticancer potential.

Background: Bendamustine is now approved in the US for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and low grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and is currently being explored in the treatment of several solid tumor types., Objective: The bi-functionality of bendamustine was used to provide a therapeutic understanding of both its benefit as well as adverse effects., Methods: Pertinent biochemistry and molecular biology pathways are reviewed with regards to bendamustine activity. In view of these pathways bendamustine was reviewed in human clinical trials., Results/conclusion: Bendamustine combines alkylating properties with purine analogue properties making it an effective drug in chronic lymphocytic leukemia where agents that affect these pathways have proven useful. There is limited evidence of cross-reactivity with this agent and other pure purine analogues and alkylators.