Search

Despite growing recognition of the importance of community-based palliative care, optimizing the use of services continues to be a challenge. Until recently, key barriers were reimbursement and limited access. As services have become increasingly available, engagement of patients and their caregivers has emerged as a major obstacle. The Palliative Activation SystemTM (PAS) is a comprehensive, quality improvement methodology designed to promote enhanced engagement of seriously ill adults and their caregivers in optimizing the use of community-based palliative care services and accelerate clinicians' progress in meeting patients' and caregivers' care goals. This paper describes the design of the PAS. Experts in patient engagement and the development and evaluation of palliative care programs advised organizational leaders in the development of this methodology. The "Patient and Family Engagement" framework proposed by Carman and colleagues (2013) guided this work. The framework informed the selection of three core concepts—care alignment, illness trajectory, and social determinants of health—as foundational to the goals of the PAS. Additionally, this framework guided the selection of measures that will be used to assess progress in achieving enhanced engagement. This background work, coupled with findings from interviews with patients and caregivers who are current recipients of palliative care services, resulted in the implementation and ongoing testing of strategies targeting clinicians and organizational leaders and designed to enhance engagement. Lessons learned from the design phase of the PAS will advance the efforts of other organizations committed to increasing patient and caregiver engagement and enhancing attainment of their goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Despite recent research focused on aging well, little is known regarding the goals and expectations from long-term services and supports (LTSS) use among older adults. Methods: To address this knowledge gap, interviewer-guided surveys with older adults newly receiving LTSS in home and community-based, assisted living, and nursing home settings in Philadelphia, New Jersey, and New York were conducted. Results: Twelve subthemes regarding the goals and expectations of 464 older adults receiving LTSS and in the context of Aging Well emerged from our analysis: maintaining function, optimizing health and circumstances, maintaining the status quo, transitioning back to the previous state, achieving independence, preserving cognitive function and capacity for psychosocial and emotional health, achieving purpose, increasing quality of life, receiving social support, increasing engagement, relieving burden, and feeling a sense of security/safety. Discussion: This in-depth analysis of qualitative data provides context for LTSS use among older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standardized classification systems for defining nursing strategies and their effectiveness still need to be fine tuned. Researchers have highlighted the features, reliability, strengths, and weaknesses of three systems including the Iowa Nursing Intervention Classification, the Omaha Classification System, and the Home Health Care Classification. Future research will likely identify the long-term usefulness of each system and targets for improvement.

Older adults receiving long-term services and supports (LTSS) experience barriers to outdoor activities and satisfaction ratings with such experiences are not well understood. Our study used cross-sectional data (n = 329) to (a) examine whether those new to LTSS were satisfied with their outdoor activities and (b) describe the characteristics and factors associated with satisfaction levels. Self-report of satisfaction with outdoor activities was the outcome variable. Multivariable linear regression modeling of the outcome was conducted. Fifty-nine percent were satisfied with their outdoor activities. More depressive symptoms (p <.001) and higher cognitive functioning (p =.011) were associated with lower ratings. Higher self-rated physical health (p =.009) and more independence with activities of daily living (p =.022) were associated with greater satisfaction. Findings suggest an unmet need among four in 10 new recipients of LTSS (41%) related to their outdoor activities. LTSS interdisciplinary teams can use these findings to inform their assessments, develop person-centered care plans, and address barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]