Search

Introduction: Active Breathing Control (ABC) is a motion management strategy that facilitates reproducible breath-hold for thoracic radiotherapy (RT), which may reduce radiation dose to organs at risk (OARs). Reduction of radiation-induced toxicity is of high importance in younger patients. However, there is little published literature on the feasibility of ABC in this group. The purpose of this study was to report our experience of using ABC for paediatric and teenage patients. Methods: Patients ≤18 years referred for thoracic RT using ABC at our centre from 2013–2021 were identified. Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain information on diagnosis, RT dose and technique, OAR dosimetry, tolerability of ABC, post-treatment imaging and early toxicity rates. Results: 12 patients completed RT and were able to comply with ABC during planning and for the duration of RT. Median age was 15.5 years (10–18 years). Diagnoses were: Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 5), mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), Ewing sarcoma (n = 5) and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1). For mediastinal RT cases (n = 6), median dose delivered was 30.6Gy(19.8–40Gy), median mean heart dose was 11.4Gy(4.8–19.4Gy), median mean lung dose was 9.9Gy(5.7–14.5Gy) and mean lung V20 was 10.9%. For ipsilateral RT cases, (n = 6), median hemithorax and total doses to primary tumour were 18Gy(15–20Gy) and 52.2Gy(36–60Gy) respectively. Median mean heart dose was 19.5Gy(10.6–33.2Gy) and median mean lung dose was 17.7Gy(16.3–30.5Gy). Mean bilateral lung V20 was 39.6%. Median mean contralateral lung dose was 5.2Gy(3.5–11.6Gy) and mean contralateral lung V20 was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 36 months, only 1 patient had symptomatic radiation pneumonitis having received further thoracic RT following relapse. Conclusions: ABC is feasible and well tolerated in younger patients receiving RT. Children as young as 10 years are able to comply. Use of ABC results in OAR dosimetry which is comparable to similar data in adults and can facilitate RT for extensive thoracic sarcoma

Purpose/Objectives: Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is increasingly used in a variety of adult cancers. To date, published experience regarding the use of MRgRT in pediatric patients is limited to two case reports. We report on the use of MRgRT for pediatric patients at our institution during a four-year period and describe important considerations in the selection and application of this technology in children. Materials/Methods: All patients treated with MRgRT since inception at our institution between 4/2018 and 4/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We also evaluated all pediatric patients treated at our institution during the same period who received either imaging or treatment using our magnetic resonanceguided linear accelerator (MR Linac). We summarize four clinical cases where MRgRT was selected for treatment in our clinic, including disease outcomes and toxicities and describe our experience using the MR Linac for imaging before and during treatment for image fusion and tumor assessments. Results: Between 4/2018 and 4/2022, 535 patients received MRgRT at our center, including 405 (75.7%) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). During this period, 347 distinct radiotherapy courses were delivered to pediatric patients, including 217 (62.5%) with proton therapy. Four pediatric patients received MRgRT. One received SABR for lung metastasis with daily adaptive replanning and a second was treated for liver metastasis using a nonadaptive workflow. Two patients received fractionated MRgRT for an ALKrearranged non-small cell lung cancer and neuroblastoma. No Grade 2 or higher toxicities were observed or reported during MRgRT or subsequent follow-up. Twelve patients underwent MR imaging without contrast during treatment for brain tumors to assess for tumor/cystic changes. Two patients treated with other modalities underwent MR simulation for target volume delineation and organ at risk sparing due to anatomic changes during treatment or unexpected delays in obtaining diagnostic MR appointments. Conclusions: In four pediatric patients treated with MRgRT, treatment was well tolerated with no severe acute effects. At our center, most pediatric patients are treated with proton therapy, but the cases selected for MRgRT demonstrated significant organ at risk sparing compared to alternative modalities. In particular, MRgRT may provide advantages for thoracic/abdominal/pelvic targets using gated delivery and adaptive replanning, but selected patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy may also benefit MRgRT through superior organ at risk sparing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the resulting dosimetry characteristics of simulation and planning techniques for proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of primary and secondary liver tumors. Methods: Consecutive patients treated under volumetric daily image guidance with liver proton SBRT between September 2019 and March 2022 at Emory Proton Therapy Center were included in this study. Prescriptions ranged from 40 Gy to 60 Gy in 3- or 5-fraction regimens, and motion management techniques were used when target motion exceeded 5 mm. 4D robust optimization was used when necessary. Dosimetry evaluation was conducted for ITV V100, D99, Dmax, and liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc. Statistical analysis was performed using independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Thirty-six tumors from 29 patients were treated. Proton therapy for primary and secondary liver tumors using motion management techniques and robust optimization resulted in high target coverage and low doses to critical organs. The median ITV V100% was 100.0%, and the median ITV D99% was 111.3%. The median liver-ITV mean dose and D700cc were 499 cGy and 5.7 cGy, respectively. The median conformity index (CI) was 1.03, and the median R50 was 2.56. Except for ITV D99% (primary 118.1% vs. secondary 107.2%, p = 0.005), there were no significant differences in age, ITV volume, ITV V100%, ITV maximum dose, liver-ITV mean dose, or D700cc between primary and secondary tumor groups. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that proton therapy with motion management techniques and robust optimization achieves excellent target coverage with low normal liver doses for primary and secondary liver tumors. The results showed high target coverage, high conformality, and low doses to the liver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study presents the clinical experiences of the New York Proton Center in employing proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) for the treatment of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. It encompasses a comprehensive examination of multiple facets, including patient simulation, delineation of target volumes and organs at risk, treatment planning, plan evaluation, quality assurance, and motion management strategies. By sharing the approaches of the New York Proton Center and providing recommendations across simulation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery, it is anticipated that the valuable experience will be provided to a broader proton therapy community, serving as a useful reference for future clinical practice and research endeavors in the field of stereotactic body proton therapy for lung tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), prostate tumor translational motion may deteriorate the planned dose distribution. Most of the major advances in motion management to date have focused on correcting this one aspect of the tumor motion, translation. However, large prostate rotation up to 30° has been measured. As the technological innovation evolves toward delivering increasingly precise radiotherapy, it is important to quantify the clinical benefit of translational and rotational motion correction over translational motion correction alone. Purpose: The purpose of this work was to quantify the dosimetric impact of intrafractional dynamic rotation of the prostate measured with a six degrees‐of‐freedom tumor motion monitoring technology. Methods: The delivered dose was reconstructed including (a) translational and rotational motion and (b) only translational motion of the tumor for 32 prostate cancer patients recruited on a 5‐fraction prostate SBRT clinical trial. Patients on the trial received 7.25 Gy in a treatment fraction. A 5 mm clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin was applied in all directions except the posterior direction where a 3 mm expansion was used. Prostate intrafractional translational motion was managed using a gating strategy, and any translation above the gating threshold was corrected by applying an equivalent couch shift. The residual translational motion is denoted as Tres$T_{res}$. Prostate intrafractional rotational motion Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$ was recorded but not corrected. The dose differences from the planned dose due to Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$, ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$) and due to Tres$T_{res}$ alone, ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$), were then determined for CTV D98, PTV D95, bladder V6Gy, and rectum V6Gy. The residual dose error due to uncorrected rotation, Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$ was then quantified: ΔDResidual$\Delta D_{Residual}$ = ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$) ‐ ΔD(Tres${T}_{\textit{res}}$). Results: Fractional data analysis shows that the dose differences from the plan (both ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$) and ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$)) for CTV D98 was less than 5% in all treatment fractions. ΔD(Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$) was larger than 5% in one fraction for PTV D95, in one fraction for bladder V6Gy, and in five fractions for rectum V6Gy. Uncorrected rotation, Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$ induced residual dose error, ΔDResidual$\Delta D_{Residual}$, resulted in less dose to CTV and PTV in 43% and 59% treatment fractions, respectively, and more dose to bladder and rectum in 51% and 53% treatment fractions, respectively. The cumulative dose over five fractions, ∑D(Tres$T_{res}$ + Runcorr$R_{uncorr}$) and ∑D(Tres$T_{res}$), was always within 5% of the planned dose for all four structures for every patient. Conclusions: The dosimetric impact of tumor rotation on a large prostate cancer patient cohort was quantified in this study. These results suggest that the standard 3–5 mm CTV‐PTV margin was sufficient to account for the intrafraction prostate rotation observed for this cohort of patients, provided an appropriate gating threshold was applied to correct for translational motion. Residual dose errors due to uncorrected prostate rotation were small in magnitude, which may be corrected using different treatment adaptation strategies to further improve the dosimetric accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose and Aim: The Vero4DRT (Brainlab AG) linear accelerator is capable of dynamic tumor tracking (DTT) by panning/tilting the radiation beam to follow respiratory-induced tumor motion in real time. In this study, the panning/tilting motion is modeled in Monte Carlo (MC) for quality assurance (QA) of four-dimensional (4D) dose distributions created within the treatment planning system (TPS). Materials and Methods: Step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were optimized for 10 previously treated liver patients. These plans were recalculated on multiple phases of a 4D computed tomography (4DCT) scan using MC while modeling panning/tilting. The dose distributions on each phase were accumulated to create a respiratory-weighted 4D dose distribution. Differences between the TPS and MC modeled doses were examined. Results: On average, 4D dose calculations in MC showed the maximum dose of an organ at risk (OAR) to be 10% greater than the TPS' three-dimensional dose calculation (collapsed cone [CC] convolution algorithm) predicted. MC's 4D dose calculations showed that 6 out of 24 OARs could exceed their specified dose limits, and calculated their maximum dose to be 4% higher on average (up to 13%) than the TPS' 4D dose calculations. Dose differences between MC and the TPS were greatest in the beam penumbra region. Conclusion: Modeling panning/tilting for DTT has been successfully modeled with MC and is a useful tool to QA respiratory-correlated 4D dose distributions. The dose differences between the TPS and MC calculations highlight the importance of using 4D MC to confirm the safety of OAR doses before DTT treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Experimental Technology & Management is the property of Experimental Technology & Management Editorial Office and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Current respiratory 4DCT imaging for high-dose rate thoracic radiotherapy treatments are negatively affected by the complex interaction of cardiac and respiratory motion. We propose an imaging method to reduce artifacts caused by thoracic motion, CArdiac and REspiratory adaptive CT (CARE-CT), that monitors respiratory motion and ECG signals in real-time, triggering CT acquisition during combined cardiac and respiratory bins. Using a digital phantom, conventional 4DCT and CARE-CT acquisitions for nineteen patient-measured physiological traces were simulated. Ten respiratory bins were acquired for conventional 4DCT scans and ten respiratory bins during cardiac diastole were acquired for CARE-CT scans. Image artifacts were quantified for 10 common thoracic organs at risk (OAR) substructures using the differential normalized cross correlation between axial slices (ΔNCC), mean squared error (MSE) and sensitivity. For all images, on average, CARE-CT improved the ΔNCC for 18/19 and the MSE and sensitivity for all patient traces. The ΔNCC was reduced for all cardiac OARs (mean reduction 21%). The MSE was reduced for all OARs (mean reduction 36%). In the digital phantom study, the average scan time was increased from 1.8 ± 0.4 min to 7.5 ± 2.2 min with a reduction in average beam on time from 98 ± 28 s to 45 s using CARE-CT compared to conventional 4DCT. The proof-of-concept study indicates the potential for CARE-CT to image the thorax in real-time during the cardiac and respiratory cycle simultaneously, to reduce image artifacts for common thoracic OARs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is an important part in the treatment of gastric lymphomas and the prognosis after radiotherapy is very good with a good chance of long-term survival, so prevention of long-term adverse effects is important. In patients with gastric lymphomas cardiac late effects are of most concern. The aim of this study was to assess if the dose to the heart could be reduced with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) without compromising the dose to the target or increasing the risk of other late effects. Methods and patients: Fifteen patients with gastric lymphoma were included. RT plans were made using DIBH and Free breathing (FB) scans. Clinical target volume (CTV) was the stomach plus 1 cm margin. The heart and surrounding organs at risk (OAR) were contoured. Two sets of plan comparisons were made, one with 1 cm CTV to planning target volume (PTV) margin in both DIBH and FB and one set with an additional 5 mm CTV to PTV margin in cranio-caudal direction with FB. Datasets were analysed with Wilcoxon signed rank test for non-parametric paired data. Results: All patients tolerated the procedures and were treated with volumetric arc therapy technique in DIBH. Target coverage was kept equal between FB and DIBH, while a statistically significant reduction of the estimated does to the heart was seen with DIBH. Median mean heart dose was reduced from 7.1 Gy (5.7–12) to a median of 3.2 Gy (1.2–7.0) and heart V20 from a median of 54 (17–106) cm3 to 15. (0.0–78) cm3. The estimated mean doses to the liver, duodenum, pancreas and spinal cord were at the same level. Conclusion: This clinical trial of RT with DIBH for gastric lymphomas showed that the heart dose could be reduced without compromising PTV coverage. The doses to abdominal OARs were similar with FB and DIBH.

Proton fields delivered by the active scanning technique can be interfered with the intrafractional motion. This in-silico study seeks to mitigate the dosimetric impacts of motion artifacts, especially its interplay with the time-modulated dose delivery. Here four-dimensional (4d) robust optimization and dose repainting, which is the multiple application of the same field with reduced fluence, were combined. Two types of repainting were considered: layered and volumetric repainting. The time-resolved dose calculation, which is necessary to quantify the interplay effect, was integrated into the treatment planning system and validated. Nine clinical cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing motion in the range of 0.4–1.5 cm were studied. It was found that the repainted delivery of 4D robustly optimized plans reduced the impact of interplay effect as quantified by the homogeneity index within the clinical target volume (CTV) to a tolerable level. Similarly, the fractional over- and underdosage was reduced sufficiently for some HCC cases to achieve the purpose of motion management. This holds true for both investigated types of repainting with small dosimetric advantages of volume repainting over layered repainting. Volume repainting, however, cannot be applied clinically in proton centers with slow energy changes. Thus, it served as a reference in the in-silico evaluation. It is recommended to perform the dynamic dose calculation for individual cases to judge if robust optimization in conjunction with repainting is sufficient to keep the interplay effect within bounds.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to be a promising therapy for unresectable pancreatic tumors. However, intrafraction motion, caused by respiratory motion and organ drift, is one of the main concerns for efficient dose delivery in ungated upper abdominal radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the intrafraction gross tumor volume (GTV) motion in a clinical cohort. Materials and methods: We included 13 patients that underwent online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided SBRT for malignancies in the pancreatic region (5 × 8 Gy). An abdominal corset was fitted in order to reduce the abdominal respiratory motion. Coronal and sagittal cine magnetic resonance images of the tumor region were made at 2 Hz during the entire beam-on time of each fraction. We used deformable image registration to obtain GTV motion profiles in all three directions, which were subsequently high-pass and low-pass filtered to isolate the motion caused by respiratory motion and baseline drift, respectively. Results: The mean (SD) respiratory amplitudes were 4.2 (1.9) mm cranio-caudal (CC), 2.3 (1.1) mm ventral-dorsal (AP) and 1.4 (0.6) mm left–right (LR), with low variability within patients. The mean (SD) maximum baseline drifts were 1.2 (1.1) mm CC, 0.5 (0.4) mm AP and 0.5 (0.3) mm LR. The mean (SD) minimum baseline drifts were −0.7 (0.5) mm CC, −0.6 (0.5) mm AP and −0.5 (0.4) mm LR. Conclusion: Overall tumor motion during treatment was small and interfractionally stable. These findings show that high-precision ungated MR-guided SBRT is feasible with an abdominal corset.

Purpose/ObjectivesMagnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is increasingly used in a variety of adult cancers. To date, published experience regarding the use of MRgRT in pediatric patients is limited to two case reports. We report on the use of MRgRT for pediatric patients at our institution during a four-year period and describe important considerations in the selection and application of this technology in children.Materials/MethodsAll patients treated with MRgRT since inception at our institution between 4/2018 and 4/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. We also evaluated all pediatric patients treated at our institution during the same period who received either imaging or treatment using our magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR Linac). We summarize four clinical cases where MRgRT was selected for treatment in our clinic, including disease outcomes and toxicities and describe our experience using the MR Linac for imaging before and during treatment for image fusion and tumor assessments.ResultsBetween 4/2018 and 4/2022, 535 patients received MRgRT at our center, including 405 (75.7%) with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). During this period, 347 distinct radiotherapy courses were delivered to pediatric patients, including 217 (62.5%) with proton therapy. Four pediatric patients received MRgRT. One received SABR for lung metastasis with daily adaptive replanning and a second was treated for liver metastasis using a non-adaptive workflow. Two patients received fractionated MRgRT for an ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and neuroblastoma. No Grade 2 or higher toxicities were observed or reported during MRgRT or subsequent follow-up. Twelve patients underwent MR imaging without contrast during treatment for brain tumors to assess for tumor/cystic changes. Two patients treated with other modalities underwent MR simulation for target volume delineation and organ at risk sparing due to anatomic changes during treatment or unexpected delays in obtaining diagnostic MR appointments.ConclusionsIn four pediatric patients treated with MRgRT, treatment was well tolerated with no severe acute effects. At our center, most pediatric patients are treated with proton therapy, but the cases selected for MRgRT demonstrated significant organ at risk sparing compared to alternative modalities. In particular, MRgRT may provide advantages for thoracic/abdominal/pelvic targets using gated delivery and adaptive replanning, but selected patients treated with fractionated radiotherapy may also benefit MRgRT through superior organ at risk sparing.

Background and purpose: Reduction of respiratory tumour motion is important in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce side effects and improve tumour control probability. We have assessed the distribution of use of voluntary exhale breath hold (EBH), abdominal compression (AC), free breathing gating (gating) and free breathing (FB), and the impact of these on treatment time. Materials and Methods: We assessed all patients treated in a single institution with liver SBRT between September 2017 and September 2021. Data from pre-simulation motion management assessment using fluoroscopic assessment of liver dome position in repeat breath holds, and motion with and without AC, was reviewed to determine liver dome position consistency in EBH and the impact of AC on motion. Treatment time was assessed for all fractions as time from first image acquisition to last treatment beam off. Results: Of 136 patients treated with 145 courses of liver SBRT, 68 % were treated in EBH, 20 % with AC, 7 % in gating and 5 % in FB. AC resulted in motion reduction

Background: Radiotherapy to tumors in the abdomen is challenging because of the significant organ movement and tissue deformation caused by respiration. Purpose: A motion management strategy that integrated ultrasound (US) imaging with abdominal compression was developed and evaluated, where US was used to real‐time monitor organ motion after abdominal compression. Methods: A device that combined a US imaging system and an abdominal compression plate (ACP) was developed. Twenty‐one healthy volunteers were involved to evaluate the motion management efficacy. Each volunteer was immobilized on a flat bench by the device. Abdominal US data were successively collected with and without ACP compression, and experiments were repeated three times to verify the imaging reproducibility. A template matching algorithm based on normalized cross‐correlation was implemented to track the targets (vessels in the liver, pancreas, and stomach) automatically. The matching algorithm was validated by comparing with the manual references. Automatic tracking was judged as failed if the center‐of‐mass difference from manual tracking was beyond a failure threshold. Based on the locations obtained through the template matching algorithm, the motion correlation between liver and pancreas/stomach was investigated using the Pearson correlation test. Paired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the difference between the results without and with ACP compression. Results: The liver motion amplitude over all 21 volunteers was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced from 14.9 ± 5.5/3.4 ± 1.8 mm in superior–inferior (SI)/anterior–posterior (AP) direction before ACP compression to 7.3 ± 1.5/1.6 ± 0.7 mm after ACP compression. The mean liver motion standard deviation before compression was on average 2.8/1.4 mm in SI/AP direction and was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced to 0.9/0.4 mm after compression. The failure rates of automatic tracking for liver, pancreas, and stomach were reduced for failure thresholds of 1–5 mm after applying ACP. The Pearson correlation coefficients between liver and pancreas/stomach were 0.98/0.97 without ACP and 0.96/0.94 with ACP in the SI direction and were 0.68/0.68 and 0.43/0.42 in the AP direction. The motion prediction errors for pancreas/stomach with ACP have significantly (p < 0.001) reduced to 0.45 ± 0.36/0.52 ± 0.43 mm from 0.69 ± 0.56/0.71 ± 0.66 mm without ACP in the SI direction, and to 0.38 ± 0.33/0.39 ± 0.27 mm from 0.44 ± 0.35/0.61 ± 0.59 mm in the AP direction. Conclusions: The proposed strategy that combines real‐time US imaging and abdominal compression has the potential to reduce the abdominal organ motion while improving both target tracking reliability and motion reproducibility. Furthermore, the observed correlation between liver and pancreas/stomach motion indicates the possibility of indirect pancreas/stomach tracking using liver markers as tracking surrogates. The strategy is expected to provide an alternative for respiratory motion management in the radiation treatment of abdominal tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To develop a methodology that can be used to measure the temporal latency of a respiratory gating system. Methods: The gating system was composed of an automatic gating interface (Response) and an in‐house respiratory motion monitoring system featuring an optically tracked surface marker. Two approaches were used to measure gating latencies. A modular approach involved measuring separately the latency of the gating system's complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor tracking camera, tracking software, and a gating latency of the LINAC. Additionally, an end‐to‐end approach was used to measure the total latency of the gating system. End‐to‐end latencies were measured using the displacement of a radiographic target moving at known velocities during the gating process. Results: Summing together the latencies of each of the modular components investigated yielded a total beam‐on latency of 1.55 s and a total beam‐off latency of 0.49 s. End‐to‐end beam‐on and beam‐off latency was found to be 1.49 and 0.34 s, respectively. In each case, no statistically significant differences were found between the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system and the summation of the individually measured components. Conclusion: Two distinct approaches to quantify gating latencies were presented. Measuring the end‐to‐end latency of the gating system provided an independent means of validating the modular approach. It is expected that the beam‐on latencies reported in this work could be reduced by altering the control system configuration of the LINAC. The modular approach can be used to decouple the individual latencies of the gating system, but future improvements in the temporal resolution of the service graphing feature are needed to reduce the uncertainty of LINAC‐related gating latencies measured using this approach. Both approaches are generalizable and can be used together when designing a quality assurance program for a respiratory gating system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Radiation pneumonitis is a major late complication in radiotherapy (RT) for lung cancer. Respiratory gating radiotherapy and deep inspiration breath hold are representative techniques to protect the normal lung by managing the movement of the tumor. However, these are highly patient-dependent techniques. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used as an alternative, but it is unclear how much pressure will be effective. We aimed to determine the optimal pressure of CPAP for RT through changes in the dosimetric parameters and lung volume according to pressure. The air pressure was raised in five steps of 4, 7, 10, 14, and 17 cmH2O and a CT scan was performed at the baseline and at each pressure step, accompanied by contouring and RT planning. CPAP linearly increased lung volume and decreased the dosimetric parameter in the pressure range 7 to 13 cmH2O (p < 0.01). Above 13 cmH2O, V5 of the heart also showed a significant decrease (p < 0.01). We aimed to determine the optimal pressure of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for radiotherapy (RT) through changes in the dosimetric parameters and lung volume according to pressure. Patients with locally advanced lung cancer, who underwent CPAP during computed tomography (CT) simulation, were included. The air pressure was raised in five steps of 4, 7, 10, 14, and 17 cmH2O and a CT scan was performed at the baseline and at each pressure step, accompanied by contouring and RT planning. Paired t- and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the volumetric and dosimetric parameters according to pressure and interpressure. A total of 29 patients were selected, and 158 CT datasets were obtained. The lung volume increased significantly at all pressures (p < 0.01). The Dmean of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O (p < 0.01), the V5, V10, V15, and V20 of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O with increasing pressure, and the Dmean and V5 of the heart decreased significantly from 14 cmH2O with increasing pressure. The V50 showed no significant differences at any pressure. We recommend the use of at least 7 cmH2O with 14 cmH2O as the optimal pressure to achieve the effect of heart preservation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall accuracy of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) workflow through a comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance procedures and assess the potential benefits of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy as a cardiac and lung dose reduction approach for left-sided breast cancer irradiation. Materials and methods: Accuracy and reproducibility of the optical surface scanner used for DIBH treatment were evaluated using different phantoms. patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of DIBH treatment were evaluated. Twenty patients were studied for treatment plan quality in target dose coverage and healthy organ sparing for the two different treatment techniques. Results: reproducibility tests for the surface scanner showed good stability within 1 mm in all directions. The maximum position variation between applied shifts on the couch and the scanner measured offsets is 1 mm in all directions. The clinical study of 200 fractions showed good agreement between the surface scanner and portal imaging with the isocenter position deviation of less than 3 mm in each lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction. The standard deviation of the DIBH level showed a value of < 2 mm during all evaluated DIBHS. Compared to the free breathing (FB) technique, DIBH showed significant reduction of 48% for heart mean dose, 43% for heart V25, and 20% for ipsilateral lung V20. Conclusion: surface-guided radiotherapy can be regarded as an accurate tool for patient positioning and monitoring in breast radiotherapy. DIBH treatment are considered to be effective techniques in heart and ipsilateral lung dose reductions for left breast radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided cardiac radioablation (CR) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a promising treatment concept. However, the visibility of AF CR targets on MRI acquisitions requires further exploration and MRI sequence and parameter optimization has not yet been performed for this application. This pilot study explores the feasibility of MRI-guided tracking of AF CR targets by evaluating AF CR target visualization on human participants using a selection of 3D and 2D MRI sequences.MRI datasets were acquired in healthy and AF participants using a range of MRI sequences and parameters. MRI acquisition categories included 3D free-breathing acquisitions (3Dacq), 2D breath-hold ECG-gated acquisitions (2DECG-gated), stacks of 2D breath-hold ECG-gated acquisitions which were retrospectively interpolated to 3D datasets (3Dinterp), and 2D breath-hold ungated acquisitions (2Dreal-time). The ease of target delineation and the presence of artifacts were qualitatively analyzed. Image quality was quantitatively analyzed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and non-uniformity. Confident 3D target delineation was achievable on all 3Dinterp datasets but was not possible on any of the 3Dacq datasets. Fewer artifacts and significantly better SNR, CNR and non-uniformity metrics were observed with 3Dinterp compared to 3Dacq. 2Dreal-time datasets had slightly lower SNR and CNR than 2DECG-gated and 3Dinterp n datasets. AF CR target visualization on MRI was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated. The study findings indicate that AF CR target visualization is achievable despite the imaging challenges associated with these targets, warranting further investigation into MRI-guided AF CR treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The commercial 0.35‐T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐guided radiotherapy vendor ViewRay recently introduced upgraded real‐time imaging frame rates based on compressed sensing techniques. Furthermore, additional motion tracking algorithms were made available. Compressed sensing allows for increased image frame rates but may compromise image quality. To assess the impact of this upgrade on respiratory gating accuracy, we evaluated gated dose distributions pre‐ and post‐upgrade using a motion phantom and radiochromic film. Methods: Seven motion waveforms (four artificial, two patient‐derived free‐breathing, and one breath‐holding) were used to drive an MRI‐compatible motion phantom. A treatment plan was developed to deliver a 3‐cm diameter spherical dose distribution typical of a stereotactic body radiotherapy plan. Gating was performed using 4‐frames per second (fps) imaging pre‐upgrade on the "default" tracking algorithm and 8‐fps post‐upgrade using the "small mobile targets" (SMT) and "large deforming targets" (LDT) tracking algorithms. Radiochromic film was placed in a moving insert within the phantom to measure dose. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared using the gamma index with 3%/3‐mm criteria. Dose–area histograms were produced to calculate the dose to 95% (D95) of the sphere planning target volume (PTV) and two simulated gross tumor volumes formed by contracting the PTV by 3 and 5 mm, respectively. Results: Gamma pass rates ranged from 18% to 93% over the 21 combinations of breathing trace and gating conditions examined. D95 ranged from 206 to 514 cGy. On average, the LDT algorithm yielded lower gamma and D95 values than the default and SMT algorithms. Conclusion: Respiratory gating at 8 fps with the new tracking algorithms provides similar gating performance to the original algorithm with 4 fps, although the LDT algorithm had lower accuracy for our non‐deformable target. This indicates that the choice of deformable image registration algorithm should be chosen deliberately based on whether the target is rigid or deforming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We propose a tumor tracking framework for 2D cine MRI based on a pair of deep learning (DL) models relying on patient-specific (PS) training., Methods and Materials: The chosen DL models are: 1) an image registration transformer and 2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7,500 frames from additional 35 patients which were manually labelled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on eight randomly selected frames from the first 5 s of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same eight frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD 50% /HD 95% ), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction (RMSE SI )., Results: The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (inter-quartile range) DSC of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD 50% of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD 95% of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm and RMSE SI of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labelling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients and the two PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients., Conclusion: For targets in the thorax, abdomen and pelvis, we found two PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The Department of Radiation Oncology of the of LMU University Hospital has research agreements with Brainlab and Elekta., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Purpose: Reducing motion is vital in treating hepatobiliary (HPB) and pancreatic malignancies. Abdominal compression (AC) and breath-hold (BH) techniques aim to minimise respiratory motion, yet their adoption remains limited, and practices vary. This review examines the impact of AC and BH on motion, set-up errors, and patient tolerability in HPB and pancreatic patients., Materials and Methods: This systematic review, conducted using PRISMA and PICOS criteria, includes publications from January 2015 to February 2023. Eligible studies focused on AC and BH interventions in adults with HPB and pancreatic malignancies. Endpoints examined motion, set-up errors, intra-fraction errors, and patient tolerability. Due to study heterogeneity, Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis was used, and a 5 mm threshold assessed the impact of motion mitigation., Results: In forty studies, 14 explored AC and 26 BH, with 20 on HPB, 13 on pancreatic, and 7 on mixed cohorts. Six studied pre-treatment, 22 inter/intra-fraction errors, and 12 both. Six AC pre-treatment studies showed > 5 mm motion, and 4 BH and 2 AC studies reported > 5 mm inter-fraction errors. Compression studies commonly investigated the arch and belt, and DIBH was the predominant BH technique. No studies compared AC and BH. There was variation in the techniques, and several studies did not follow standardised error reporting. Patient experience and tolerability were under-reported., Conclusion: The results indicate that AC effectively reduces motion, but its effectiveness may vary. BH can immobilise motion; however, it can be inconsistent between fractions. The review underscores the need for larger, standardised studies and emphasizes the importance of considering the patient's perspective for tailored treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy (RGPT) is an active motion management technique that utilizes treatment gating and tumor tracking via fiducial markers. When performing RGPT treatment for prostate cancer, it is essential to account for the CTV displacement relative to the body in the clinical workflow. The workflow at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) includes bone matching via CT-CBCT images, followed by fiducial matching via pulsed fluoroscopy (soft tissue matching), and finally, a robustness evaluation procedure to determine if the difference is within an allowable tolerance. In this study, we compare two CTV translation methods for robustness evaluation: (1) an in-house translation algorithm and (2) the RayStation "simulate organ motion" Deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm., Methods: Nine RGPT prostate patient plans with CTV volumes ranging from 17.1 to 96.72 cm 2 were included in this study. An in-house translation algorithm and "simulate organ motion" DIR RayStation algorithm were used to generate CTV shifts along R-L, I-S, and P-A axes between ± $ \pm $ 10 mm at 2 mm steps. At each step, dose metrics, which include CTV D max , CTV D 95% , and CTV D 98% , were extracted and used as comparative metrics for CTV target coverage and hot spot evaluation., Results: Across all axes, there were no statistically significant differences between the two algorithms for all three dose metrics: CTV D max (P = 0.92, P = 0.91, and P = 0.47), CTV D 95% (P = 0.97, P = 0.22, and P = 0.33), and CTV D 98% (P = 0.85, P = 0.33, and P = 0.36). Further, the in-house translation algorithm evaluation time was less than 10 s, two orders of magnitude faster than the DIR algorithm., Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the simpler in-house algorithm performs equivalently to the realistic DIR algorithm when simulating CTV motion in prostate cancers. Furthermore, the in-house algorithm completes the robustness evaluation two orders of magnitude faster than the DIR algorithm. This significant reduction in evaluation time is crucial especially when preparatory time efficiency is of paramount importance in a busy clinic., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Introduction: Intra- and inter-fraction rectum motion is important for pelvic radiotherapy (RT). This study assesses how RT session duration, the presence or the absence of an intra-rectal tumour, and the distance from the anorectal junction (ARJd) impact rectal motion., Materials and Methods: Analyses used cone-beam computed tomographies (CBCTs) from RT patients treated for rectal and prostate cancer. Three structures were evaluated: (1) the entire rectum in patients without a rectal tumour (Rectum Prostate ); (2) the non-invaded portion (Rectum Rectum ) and (3) the tumour-invaded portion (Rectum Tumour ) in rectal cancer patients.Intrafraction motion was assessed using the Hausdorff distance 95% and the Mean distance-to-agreement between structures delineated on the first CBCT and the 2 subsequent CBCTs within a same RT session. Interfraction motion was quantified by comparing structures delineated on the planning-CT and the first CBCT of each session.Linear mixed model evaluated rectum motion in relation to time, tumour presence, and ARJd, respectively., Results: We included 10 patients with and 10 without rectal cancer, collecting 385 CBCTs. A significant correlation (p < 0.05) between rectum motion and RT session duration was found. Intrafraction motion was significantly higher in prostate cancer patients (Rectum Prostate motion > Rectum Rectum and Rectum Tumour , p < 0.01). For interfraction motion, only the mean distance to agreement was significantly higher for Rectum Prostate (p < 0.05). Motion increased significantly with ARJd for all three structures (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Session duration, absence of a tumour, and ARJd are associated with larger intra- and interfraction rectal motion. This highlights the need for tailored RT treatment, including online-adaptive RT, to manage intra- and interfraction variations. Rectal motion should be handled differently for patients with prostate cancer and those with rectal cancer., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Julien Pierrard: PhD project was partially funded by Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company. Sopfie Heylen: None. Ad Vandermeulen: None. Geneviève Van Ooteghem: None]., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: The impact of respiratory motion management strategies for abdominal radiotherapy, such as abdominal compression (AC) and breath hold (BH), on abdominal organ at risk (OAR) delineation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unknown. This feasibility study compared the inter- and intra- observer delineation variation on MRI acquired with AC, BH for three critical abdominal OAR., Materials and Methods: T2-weighted (W) 3D MRI in free-breathing (FB) and with AC, and T1W 3D mDixon exhale BH were acquired. Four observers blinded to motion management strategy used, delineated stomach, liver, and duodenum on all MRI. One case per strategy was repeated over 6 weeks later to quantify intra-observer variation. Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) contours for each OAR were generated, median and IQR mean distance to agreement (mDTA) and maximum Hausdorff distance (HD) between observer and STAPLE contours were calculated. Observers scored organ visibility on each MRI using a four-point Likert scale., Results: A total of 27 scans including repeats were delineated. Pooled mDTA for all OARs was 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) with AC, 1.4 mm (1.0 mm) with BH, and 1.3 mm (0.5 mm) in FB. Intra-observer mDTA was highest for all organs in FB with 10.8 mm for duodenum, 1.8 mm for liver, and 2.7 mm for stomach. The pooled mean perceptual quality score value was highest for AC across organs., Conclusions: No motion management strategy demonstrated superior similarity across OAR, emphasizing the need for personalised approaches based on individual clinical and patient factors., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Mairead Daly reports financial support was provided by Cancer Research UK. All authors reports financial support was provided by Cancer Research UK. Mairead Daly reports financial support was provided by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Ananya Choudhury reports financial support was provided by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Alan McWilliam reports financial support was provided by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Lisa McDaid reports financial support was provided by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Cynthia Eccles reports financial support was provided by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Mairead Daly reports financial support was provided by The Christie Charity. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) eliminates interfraction uncertainties by adaption before each treatment session. However, intrafraction motions still exist and could become more severe due to long treatment time. Large isotropic margins can ensure clinical target volume (CTV) coverage but at the cost of more organs at risk damage. In this study, we proposed a novel personalized anisotropic margin search algorithm for cervical cancer radiation therapy under the guidance of daily iterative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT) to find the optimal margin values for each patient, which achieves the smallest possible planning target volume (PTV) and maintains CTV coverage. Twenty-two online Ethos ART treatment sessions were included for analysis. Two iCBCT scans were taken in each session. The first one (iCBCT 1 ) was taken after positioning, and the second one (iCBCT 2 ) was taken before beam delivery. Corresponding CTV 1 and CTV 2 were contoured in the two scans. In each session, minimal isotropic margins were first searched by iteratively increasing the magnitude until the resulting PTV iso covers 99% of CTV 2 . Afterward, the margin values in all six directions were decreased iteratively until CTV 2 coverage was smaller than 99% to get the personalized margin and target volume PTV int . In addition, the uterus was considered separately, and different margins were found for it and the remaining CTV, respectively, to reduce the target volume of PTV sep  further. PTV iso , PTV int , and PTV sep were compared in terms of CTV 2 coverage and absolute volume. The algorithm successfully generated PTV iso , PTV int , and PTV sep for all online ART treatment sessions. The mean ± SD values for PTV iso 5mm , PTV iso 10mm , PTV iso 15mm , PTV int , and PTV sep  were 1,074.0 ± 78.1, 1,519.5 ± 100.4, 2,006.4 ± 122.5, 929.3 ± 73.4, and 845.1 ± 72.5 mL, respectively. The volume difference between PTV int  and PTV sep  was significant (p < 0.001). All the PTVs ensured an average coverage larger than 99%, and the differences between any two PTVs were insignificant. This study proposed a novel personalized anisotropic margin search algorithm for cervical cancer online ART. Compared to the conventional 5 or 10 mm isotropic margins, the personalized anisotropic margin reduced PTV volume by 13.5% and 38.8%, respectively; if the uterus was considered separately, the volume can be further reduced by 21.3% and 44.3%, respectively, while CTV coverage was still maintained. This algorithm could reduce target volume and potentially spare normal tissue better than isotropic margin expansion., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Xiao et al.)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly being prescribed for treating patients with multiple metastases, especially in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Treating multiple targets presents unique challenges in radiotherapy planning and delivery, including practical considerations relating to treatment time, resource allocation, and treatment planning complexity. Treating targets in a common isocenter reduces the time required for treatment and simplifies planning, but historically, it has often not been feasible due to inter- and intra-fractional variation in relative target positions. With online adaptation, individual targets can be re-contoured on each treatment fraction to obviate inter-fractional variation, and with appropriate margin selection intra-fractional motion can be managed. In this case report, we describe single-isocenter, multiple-target treatment via online adaptation of a 93-year-old man with a history of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. He initially presented with a 9.1 cm liver mass, suspicious lung lesions, and an enlarged porta hepatis lymph node, which were biopsy proven to be hepatocellular carcinoma. Following 18 months of systemic immunotherapy, he demonstrated a favorable response, including a reduction in primary liver mass to 5.1 cm and resolution of pulmonary lesions; however, recent serial imaging demonstrated oligoprogression of two peripancreatic lymph node conglomerates that were biopsy proven to be poorly differentiated carcinoma. The patient was offered adaptive SBRT to a dose of 35-40 Gy in five fractions as a consolidative approach for treating both the primary liver mass and oligoprogressive lymph nodes. He tolerated treatment without any grade 2 or higher acute toxicity and had stable disease on three-month post-treatment imaging. By leveraging online adaptation, especially for the daily re-definition of target volumes, we were able to treat three targets in the abdomen accurately in a common isocenter. Treating in this manner vastly shortened and simplified the patient's radiation course. Quantitative evaluation of re-contoured targets and post-treatment imaging highlighted the value of online adaption with careful margin specification and alignment instructions., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Raranje et al.)

(1) Background: the aims of this study were to determine the total extent of pancreatic cancer’s internal motions, using Calypso® extracranial tracking, and to indicate possible clinical advantages of continuous intrafractional fiducial-based tumor motion tracking during SABR. (2) Methods: thirty-four patients were treated with SABR for LAPC using Calypso® for motion management. Planning MSCTs in FB and DBH, and 4D-CTs were performed. Using data from Calypso® and 4D-CTs, the movements of the lesions in the CC, AP and LR directions, as well as the volumes of the 4D-CT-based ITV and the volumes of the Calypso®-based ITV were compared. (3) Results: significantly larger medians of tumor excursions were found with Calypso® than with 4D-CT: CC: 29 mm (p < 0.001); AP: 14 mm (p < 0.001) and LR: 11 mm (p < 0.039). The median volume of the Calypso®-based ITV was significantly larger than that of the 4D-CT based ITV (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: beside known respiratory-induced internal motions, pancreatic cancer seems to have significant additional motions which should be considered during respiratory motion management. Only direct and continuous intrafractional fiducial-based motion tracking seems to provide complete coverage of the target lesion with the prescribed isodose, which could allow for safe tumor dose escalation.

• Four-dimensional MRI facilitates direct visualization of liver tumor motion. • Binning images by the amplitude respiratory trace produces the sharpest images. • Separating inspiration and expiration during image binning captures hysteresis. • Conventional radiation plans using 4D-CT do not fully cover 4D-MRI-derived targets. • Four-dimensional MRI may reduce the risk of marginal misses. Liver tumors are often invisible on four-dimensional commuted tomography (4D-CT). Imperfect imaging surrogates are used to estimate the tumor motion. Here, we assessed multiple 4D magnetic resonance (MR) binning algorithms for directly visualizing liver tumor motion for radiotherapy planning. Patients were simulated using a 3 Tesla MR and CT scanner. Three prototype binning algorithms (phase, amplitude, and two-directional) were applied to the 4D-MRIs, and the image quality was assessed using a qualitative clarity score and quantitative sharpness score. Radiation plans were generated for internal target volumes (ITVs) derived using 4D-MRI and 4D-CT, and the dosimetry of targets were compared. Paired t -tests were used to compare sharpness scores and dosimetric data. Twelve patients with 17 liver tumors were scanned between May and November 2021. Compared to phase binning, two-directional demonstrated equal or better clarity and sharpness scores (end-expiration: 0.33 vs 0.38, p = 0.018, end-inspiration: 0.28 vs 0.31, p = 0.010). Compared to amplitude binning, two-directional binning captured hysteresis of ≥ 3 mm in 35 % of patients. Evaluation of dosimetry CT-optimized plans revealed that PTV coverage of MR-derived targets were significantly lower than CT-derived targets (PTV receiving 90 % of prescription: 75.56 % vs 89.38 %, p = 0.002). Using contrast-enhanced 4D-MRI is feasible for directly delineating liver tumors throughout the respiratory cycle. The current standard of using radiation plans optimized for 4D-CT-derived targets achieved lower coverage of directly visualized MRI targets, suggesting that adopting MRI for motion management may improve radiation treatment of liver lesions and reduce the risk of marginal misses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effectiveness of abdominal compression for motion management in hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HPB) radiotherapy has not been systematically evaluated. A systematic review was carried out using PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases up to 1 July 2021. No date restrictions were applied. Additional searches were carried out using the University of Manchester digital library, Google Scholar and of retrieved papers' reference lists. Studies conducted evaluating respiratory motion utilising imaging with and without abdominal compression in the same patients available in English were included. Studies conducted in healthy volunteers or majority non-HPB sites, not providing descriptive motion statistics or patient characteristics before and after compression in the same patients or published without peer-review were excluded. A narrative synthesis was employed by tabulating retrieved studies and organising chronologically by abdominal compression device type to help identify patterns in the evidence. The inclusion criteria were met by 6 studies with a total of 152 patients. Designs were a mix of retrospective and prospective quantitative designs with chronological, non-randomised recruitment. Abdominal compression reduced craniocaudal respiratory motion in the majority of patients, although in four studies there were increases seen in at least one direction. The influence of patient comorbidities on effectiveness of compression, and/or comfort with compression was not evaluated in any study. Abdominal compression may not be appropriate for all patients, and benefit should be weighed with potential increase in motion or discomfort in patients with small initial motion (<5 mm). Patient factors including male sex, and high body mass index (BMI) were found to impact the effectiveness of compression, however with limited evidence. High-quality studies are warranted to fully assess the clinical impact of abdominal compression on treatment outcomes and toxicity prospective in comparison to other motion management strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To minimize computation latency using a predictive strategy to retrieve and project tumor volume onto 2D MR beam eye's view (BEV) cine from time-resolved four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (TR-4DMRI) libraries (inhalation/exhalation) for personalized MR-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: Two time-series forecasting algorithms, autoregressive (AR) modeling and deep-learning-based long short-term memory (LSTM), were applied to predict the diaphragm position in the next 2D BEV cine to identify a motion-matched and hysteresis-accounted image to retrieve the tumor volume from the inhalation/exhalation TR-4DMRI libraries. Three 40-s TR-4DMRI (2 Hz, 3 × 80 images) per patient of eight lung cancer patients were used to create patient-specific inhalation/exhalation 4DMRI libraries, extract diaphragmatic waveforms, and interpolate them to f = 4 and 8 Hz to match 2D cine frame rates. Along a (40• f)-timepoint waveform, 30• f training timepoints were moved forward to produce 3×(10• f -1) predictions. The accuracy of position prediction was assessed against the waveform ground truth. The accuracy of tumor volume projections was evaluated using the center-of-mass difference (∆COM) and Dice similarity index against the TR-4DMRI ground truth for both IMRT (six beam angles, 30° interval) and VMAT (240/480 beam angles, 1.5°/0.75° interval, at 4/8 Hz, respectively). Results: The accuracy of the first-timepoint prediction is 0.36 ± 0.10 mm (AR) and 0.62 ± 0.21 mm (LSTM) at 4 Hz and 0.06 ± 0.02 mm (AR) and 0.18 ± 0.06 mm (LSTM) at 8 Hz. A 10%–20% random error in prediction-library matching increases the overall uncertainty slightly. For both IMRT and VMAT, the accuracy of projected tumor volume contours on 2D BEV cine is ∆COM = 0.39 ± 0.13 mm and DICE = 0.97 ± 0.02 at 4 Hz and ∆COM = 0.10 ± 0.04 mm and DICE = 1.00 ± 0.00 at 8Hz. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of accurately predicting respiratory motion during 2D BEV cine imaging, identifying a motion-matched and hysteresis-accounted tumor volume, and projecting tumor volume contour on 2D BEV cine for real-time assessment of beam-to-tumor conformality, promising for optimal personalized MR-guided radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Respiratory motion may compromise the dose delivery accuracy in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Motion management can improve treatment delivery. However, external surrogate signal may be unstable and inaccurate. This study reports the first case of liver SBRT based on internal electromagnetic motion monitoring (Calypso, Varian Medical Systems, USA) in China. Materials and methods: The patient with a primary liver cancer was treated with respiratory-gated SBRT guided by three implanted electromagnetic transponders. The treatment was carried out in breath-hold end-exhale with beam-on when the centroid of the three transponders drifted within 5 mm (left–right (LR), anterior–posterior (AP) and cranio-caudal (CC) directions) from the planned position. The motion monitoring treatments were delivered in breath-hold end-exhale mode with the energy of 6 MV in FFF mode with 1200 monitor units (MU) per minute. For each fraction, QA results, intertransponder distances, geometric checks as well as tumor motion logs were explicitly recorded. Results: Comparing with the plan data, distance variances between each two transponders were − 0.56 ± 0.32 mm, 0.17 ± 0.33 mm and − 0.82 ± 0.68 mm. Geometric residual, the pitch, roll and yaw angles were 0.48 ± 0.21 mm (threshold 2.0 mm), 2.17° ± 1.85° (threshold 10°), − 2.42° ± 1.51° (threshold 10°) and 1.67° ± 1.07° (threshold 10°), respectively. The delivery time of the five fields were 13.8 s, 13.1 s, 11.2 s, 11.6 s, and 11.6 s with the average value of 12.3 ± 1.1 s. Treatment duration of each fraction ranged from 6.2 to 21.4 min, with the average value of 11.3 ± 5.0 min. Conclusions: The first case of liver SBRT patient of China based on internal electromagnetic motion monitoring was performed. The system had a high tracking accuracy, and it did not delay the treatment time. In addition, the patient did not show any severe side effects except for grade I myelotoxicity. The internal electromagnetic motion monitoring system provides a real-time and direct way to track liver tumor targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A positioning technique in breast cancer radiotherapy using ExacTrac was evaluated. • This technique does not need any tattoos and temporary skin marks. • The positioning accuracy of this technique was investigated by 2D gamma index method. • The ExacTrac-based positioning technique provided a good irradiation accuracy. Conventionally, tattoos and temporary skin marks are used in patient positioning procedures for breast cancer radiotherapy. However, many patients dislike these marks because their daily lives are affected by them. Therefore, we developed a new positioning technique using ExacTrac (BrainLAB AG, Munich, Germany). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical implementation of a tattoo-free positioning technique for breast cancer radiotherapy using ExacTrac. We included 35 patients with breast cancer, 14 with tattoo-based positioning and 21 with tattoo-free positioning using ExacTrac. In this ExacTrac-based positioning technique, the patients were aligned around the mamilla of the ipsilateral breast, and 6D registration was performed later at the virtual isocenter, which was placed at the spinal cord. The target displacement relative to the treatment isocenter was identified and then compensated for using robotic couch translations and rotations. The gamma index method analyzes the integrated dose images of the transmitted radiation dose through patients to investigate the irradiation accuracy of the two positioning techniques. The clinical implementation of the ExacTrac-based positioning technique was evaluated by comparing the gamma passing rate of the tattoo-based and ExacTrac-based positioning techniques. The mean gamma passing rates of the tattoo-based and ExacTrac-based positioning techniques were 86.0 ± 10.2% and 90.9 ± 6.9%, respectively. The ExacTrac-based positioning technique provided positioning comparable to that of the tattoo-based positioning technique. Consequently, the clinical implementation of the tattoo-free positioning technique in breast cancer radiotherapy using ExacTrac was demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeMagnetic resonance image (MRI) guided radiotherapy enables gating directly on the target position. We present an evaluation of an MRI-guided radiotherapy system's gating performance using an MRI-compatible respiratory motion phantom and radiochromic film. Our evaluation is geared toward validation of our institution's clinical gating protocol which involves planning to a target volume formed by expanding 5 mm about the gross tumor volume (GTV) and gating based on a 3 mm window about the GTV.MethodsThe motion phantom consisted of a target rod containing high-contrast target inserts which moved in the superior-inferior direction inside a body structure containing background contrast material. The target rod was equipped with a radiochromic film insert. Treatment plans were generated for a 3 cm diameter spherical planning target volume, and delivered to the phantom at rest and in motion with and without gating. Both sinusoidal trajectories and tumor trajectories measured during MRI-guided treatments were used. Similarity of the gated dose distribution to the planned, motion-frozen, distribution was quantified using the gamma technique.ResultsWithout gating, gamma pass rates using 4%/3 mm criteria were 22-59% depending on motion trajectory. Using our clinical standard of repeated breath holds and a gating window of 3 mm with 10% target allowed outside the gating boundary, the gamma pass rate was 97.8% with 3%/3 mm gamma criteria. Using a 3 mm window and 10% allowed excursion, all of the patient tumor motion trajectories at actual speed resulting in at least 95% gamma pass rate at 4%/3 mm.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the device can be used to compensate respiratory motion using a 3 mm gating margin and 10% allowed excursion results in conjunction with repeated breath holds. Full clinical validation requires a comprehensive evaluation of tracking performance in actual patient images, outside the scope of this study.

PurposeTo minimize computation latency using a predictive strategy to retrieve and project tumor volume onto 2D MR beam eye’s view (BEV) cine from time-resolved four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (TR-4DMRI) libraries (inhalation/exhalation) for personalized MR-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT).MethodsTwo time-series forecasting algorithms, autoregressive (AR) modeling and deep-learning-based long short-term memory (LSTM), were applied to predict the diaphragm position in the next 2D BEV cine to identify a motion-matched and hysteresis-accounted image to retrieve the tumor volume from the inhalation/exhalation TR-4DMRI libraries. Three 40-s TR-4DMRI (2 Hz, 3 × 80 images) per patient of eight lung cancer patients were used to create patient-specific inhalation/exhalation 4DMRI libraries, extract diaphragmatic waveforms, and interpolate them to f = 4 and 8 Hz to match 2D cine frame rates. Along a (40•f)-timepoint waveform, 30•f training timepoints were moved forward to produce 3×(10•f-1) predictions. The accuracy of position prediction was assessed against the waveform ground truth. The accuracy of tumor volume projections was evaluated using the center-of-mass difference (∆COM) and Dice similarity index against the TR-4DMRI ground truth for both IMRT (six beam angles, 30° interval) and VMAT (240/480 beam angles, 1.5°/0.75° interval, at 4/8 Hz, respectively).ResultsThe accuracy of the first-timepoint prediction is 0.36 ± 0.10 mm (AR) and 0.62 ± 0.21 mm (LSTM) at 4 Hz and 0.06 ± 0.02 mm (AR) and 0.18 ± 0.06 mm (LSTM) at 8 Hz. A 10%–20% random error in prediction-library matching increases the overall uncertainty slightly. For both IMRT and VMAT, the accuracy of projected tumor volume contours on 2D BEV cine is ∆COM = 0.39 ± 0.13 mm and DICE = 0.97 ± 0.02 at 4 Hz and ∆COM = 0.10 ± 0.04 mm and DICE = 1.00 ± 0.00 at 8Hz.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of accurately predicting respiratory motion during 2D BEV cine imaging, identifying a motion-matched and hysteresis-accounted tumor volume, and projecting tumor volume contour on 2D BEV cine for real-time assessment of beam-to-tumor conformality, promising for optimal personalized MR-guided radiotherapy.

Abstract Purpose Variation in target positioning represents a challenge to set-up reproducibility and reliability of dose delivery with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While on-board imaging for fiducial matching allows for daily shifts to optimize target positioning, the magnitude of the shift as a result of inter- and intra-fraction variation may directly impact target coverage and dose to organs-at-risk. Herein, we characterize the variation patterns for PDAC patients treated at a high-volume institution with SBRT. Methods We reviewed 30 consecutive patients who received SBRT using active breathing coordination (ABC). Patients were aligned to bone and then subsequently shifted to fiducials. Inter-fraction and intra-fraction scans were reviewed to quantify the mean and maximum shift along each axis, and the shift magnitude. A linear regression model was conducted to investigate the relationship between the inter- and intra-fraction shifts. Results The mean inter-fraction shift in the LR, AP, and SI axes was 3.1 ± 1.8 mm, 2.9 ± 1.7 mm, and 3.5 ± 2.2 mm, respectively, and the mean vector shift was 6.4 ± 2.3 mm. The mean intra-fraction shift in the LR, AP, and SI directions were 2.0 ± 0.9 mm, 2.0 ± 1.3 mm, and 2.3 ± 1.4 mm, respectively, and the mean vector shift was 4.3 ± 1.8 mm. A linear regression model showed a significant relationship between the inter- and intra-fraction shift in the AP and SI axis and the shift magnitude. Conclusions Clinically significant inter- and intra-fraction variation occurs during treatment of PDAC with SBRT even with a comprehensive motion management strategy that utilizes ABC. Future studies to investigate how these variations could lead to variation in the dose to the target and OAR should be investigated. Strategies to mitigate the dosimetric impact, including real time imaging and adaptive therapy, in select cases should be considered.

• Commissioning measurements for RGPT reported for the first time. • RGPT specific daily and monthly QA are proposed for the first time. • The gating latencies for turning the proton beam on and off are 119.5 and 50.0 ms respectively. • Daily marker localization QA results are all less than 0.2 mm. Real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) is a motion management technique unique to the Hitachi particle therapy system. It uses pulsed fluoroscopy to track an implanted fiducial marker. There are currently no published guidelines on how to conduct the commissioning and quality assurance. In this work we reported on our centre's commissioning workflow and our daily and monthly QA procedures. Six commissioning measurements were designed for RGPT. The measurements include imaging qualities, fluoroscopic exposures, RGPT marker tracking accuracy, temporal gating latency, fiducial marker tracking fidelity and an end-to-end proton dosimetry measurement. Daily QA consists of one measurement on marker localization accuracy. Four months daily QA trends are presented. Monthly QA consists of three measurements on the gating latency, fluoroscopy imaging quality and dosimetry verification of gating operation with RGPT. The RGPT was successfully commissioned in our centre. The air kerma rates were within 15 % from specifications and the marker tracking accuracies were within 0.245 mm. The gating latencies for turning the proton beam on and off were 119.5 and 50.0 ms respectively. The 0.4x10.0 mm2 Gold AnchorTM gave the best tracking results with visibility up to 30 g/cm2. Gamma analysis showed that dose distribution of a moving and static detectors had a passing rate of more than 95 % at 3 %/3mm. The daily marker localization QA results were all less than 0.2 mm. This work could serve as a good reference for other upcoming Hitachi particle therapy centres who are interested to use RGPT as their motion management solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most available four‐dimensional (4D)‐magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are limited by insufficient image quality and long acquisition times or require specially designed sequences or hardware that are not available in the clinic. These limitations have greatly hindered the clinical implementation of 4D‐MRI. Purpose: This study aims to develop a fast ultra‐quality (UQ) 4D‐MRI reconstruction method using a commercially available 4D‐MRI sequence and dual‐supervised deformation estimation model (DDEM). Methods: Thirty‐nine patients receiving radiotherapy for liver tumors were included. Each patient was scanned using a time‐resolved imaging with interleaved stochastic trajectories (TWIST)–lumetric interpolated breath‐hold examination (VIBE) MRI sequence to acquire 4D‐magnetic resonance (MR) images. They also received 3D T1‐/T2‐weighted MRI scans as prior images, and UQ 4D‐MRI at any instant was considered a deformation of them. A DDEM was developed to obtain a 4D deformable vector field (DVF) from 4D‐MRI data, and the prior images were deformed using this 4D‐DVF to generate UQ 4D‐MR images. The registration accuracies of the DDEM, VoxelMorph (normalized cross‐correlation [NCC] supervised), VoxelMorph (end‐to‐end point error [EPE] supervised), and the parametric total variation (pTV) algorithm were compared. Tumor motion on UQ 4D‐MRI was evaluated quantitatively using region of interest (ROI) tracking errors, while image quality was evaluated using the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), lung–liver edge sharpness, and perceptual blur metric (PBM). Results: The registration accuracy of the DDEM was significantly better than those of VoxelMorph (NCC supervised), VoxelMorph (EPE supervised), and the pTV algorithm (all, p < 0.001), with an inference time of 69.3 ± 5.9 ms. UQ 4D‐MRI yielded ROI tracking errors of 0.79 ± 0.65, 0.50 ± 0.55, and 0.51 ± 0.58 mm in the superior–inferior, anterior–posterior, and mid–lateral directions, respectively. From the original 4D‐MRI to UQ 4D‐MRI, the CNR increased from 7.25 ± 4.89 to 18.86 ± 15.81; the lung–liver edge full‐width‐at‐half‐maximum decreased from 8.22 ± 3.17 to 3.65 ± 1.66 mm in the in‐plane direction and from 8.79 ± 2.78 to 5.04 ± 1.67 mm in the cross‐plane direction, and the PBM decreased from 0.68 ± 0.07 to 0.38 ± 0.01. Conclusion: This novel DDEM method successfully generated UQ 4D‐MR images based on a commercial 4D‐MRI sequence. It shows great promise for improving liver tumor motion management during radiation therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Backgrounds: Respiratory gating is one of the motion management techniques that is used to deliver radiation dose to a tumor at a specific position under free breathing. However, due to the dynamic feedback process of this approach, regular equipment quality assurance (QA) and patient‐specific QA checks need to be performed. This work proposes a new QA methodology using electronic portal imaging detector (EPID) to determine the target localization accuracy of phase gating. Methods: QA tools comprising 3D printed spherical tumor phantoms, programmable stages, and an EPID detector are characterized and assembled. Algorithms for predicting portal dose (PD) through moving phantoms are developed and verified using gamma analysis for two spherical tumor phantoms (2 cm and 4 cm), two different 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, and two different gating windows (30%–70% and 40%–60%). Comparison between the two gating windows is then performed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. An optimizer routine, which is used to determine the optimal window, based on maximal gamma passing rate (GPR), was applied to an actual breathing curve and breathing plan. This was done to ascertain if our method yielded a similar result with the actual gating window. Results: High GPRs of more than 97% and 91% were observed when comparing the predicted PD with the measured PD in moving phantom at 2 mm/2% and 1 mm/1% levels, respectively. Analysis of gamma heatmaps shows an excellent agreement with the tumor phantom. The GPR of 40%–60% PD was significantly lower than that of the 30%–70% PD at the 1 mm/1% level (p = 0.0064). At the 2 mm/2% level, no significant differences were observed. The optimizer routine could accurately predict the center of the gating window to within a 10% range. Conclusion: We have successfully performed and verified a new method for QA with the use of a moving phantom with EPID for phase gating with real‐time position management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dose uncertainty induced by respiratory motion remains a major concern for treating thoracic and abdominal lesions using particle beams. This Task Group report reviews the impact of tumor motion and dosimetric considerations in particle radiotherapy, current motion‐management techniques, and limitations for different particle‐beam delivery modes (i.e., passive scattering, uniform scanning, and pencil‐beam scanning). Furthermore, the report provides guidance and risk analysis for quality assurance of the motion‐management procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy, and discusses future development and emerging motion‐management strategies. This report supplements previously published AAPM report TG76, and considers aspects of motion management that are crucial to the accurate and safe delivery of particle‐beam therapy. To that end, this report produces general recommendations for commissioning and facility‐specific dosimetric characterization, motion assessment, treatment planning, active and passive motion‐management techniques, image guidance and related decision‐making, monitoring throughout therapy, and recommendations for vendors. Key among these recommendations are that: (1) facilities should perform thorough planning studies (using retrospective data) and develop standard operating procedures that address all aspects of therapy for any treatment site involving respiratory motion; (2) a risk‐based methodology should be adopted for quality management and ongoing process improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A further investigation of the clinical necessity of 4D optimization is warranted. • Benefits of 4D optimization in terms of higher robustness have been reported. • Many studies found that 3D robustly optimized plans were also suitable for treatments. • A need for consensus on 4D dose calculation and evaluation is identified. 4D multi-image-based (4D MIB) optimization is a form of robust optimization where different uncertainty scenarios, due to anatomy variations, are considered via multiple image sets (e.g., 4DCT). In this review, we focused on providing an overview of different 4D MIB optimization implementations, introduced various frameworks to evaluate the robustness of scanned particle therapy affected by breathing motion and summarized the existing evidence on the necessity of using 4D MIB optimization clinically. Expected potential benefits of 4D MIB optimization include more robust and/or interplay-effect-resistant doses for the target volume and organs-at-risk for indications affected by anatomical variations (e.g., breathing, peristalsis, etc.). Although considerable literature is available on the research and technical aspects of 4D MIB , clinical studies are rare and often contain methodological limitations, such as, limited patient number, motion amplitude, motion and delivery time structure considerations, number of repeat CTs, etc. Therefore, the data are not conclusive. In addition, multiple studies have found that robust 3D optimized plans result in dose distributions within the set clinical tolerances and, therefore, are suitable for a treatment of moving targets with scanned particle therapy. We, therefore, consider the clinical necessity of 4D MIB optimization, when treating moving targets with scanned particle therapy, as still to be demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The major aim of radiation therapy is to provide curative or palliative treatment to cancerous malignancies while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Charged particle radiotherapy utilizing carbon ions or protons is uniquely suited for this task due to its ability to achieve highly conformal dose distributions around the tumor volume. For these treatment modalities, uncertainties in the localization of patient anatomy due to inter- and intra-fractional motion present a heightened risk of undesired dose delivery. A diverse range of mitigation strategies have been developed and clinically implemented in various disease sites to monitor and correct for patient motion, but much work remains. This review provides an overview of current clinical practices for inter and intra-fractional motion management in charged particle therapy, including motion control, current imaging and motion tracking modalities, as well as treatment planning and delivery techniques. We also cover progress to date on emerging technologies including particle-based radiography imaging, novel treatment delivery methods such as tumor tracking and FLASH, and artificial intelligence and discuss their potential impact towards improving or increasing the challenge of motion mitigation in charged particle therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Cardiorespiratory ITV generated using cardiac-gated and respiratory-gated 4DCT. • Cardiorespiratory motions lead to an important increase of target volume in cardiac radioablation. • Combining 2 cardiac phases with 10 respiratory phases is a robust approach. • Using a single cardiac phase with our without fixed margin is a suboptimal approach. To evaluate different approaches for generating a cardiorespiratory ITV for cardiac radioablation. Four patients with ventricular tachycardia were included in this study. For each patient, cardiac-gated and respiration-correlated 4D-CT scans were acquired. The cardiorespiratory ITV was defined using registrations of the cardiac and respiratory 4D-CT images. Five different approaches, which differed in the number of incorporated cardiac phases (1, 2, 10, or 1 with a fixed 3 mm margin (FM) expansion) and respiratory phases (2 or 10), were evaluated. For each approach, a VMAT treatment plan was simulated. Target coverage (TC) and spill were evaluated geometrically and dosimetrically for each approach. When employing one cardiac phase, the TC did not exceed 85%. Using the two extreme phases of the cardiac and respiratory cycles resulted in a geometric TC < 88% for two patients, with a dosimetric TC of 83% for one patient. An acceptable TC for all patients (geometric TC > 89%, dosimetric TC > 92%) was only achieved when combining 10 respiratory phases with either 2 or 10 cardiac phases or a single cardiac phase with FM. The use of a single cardiac phase with FM combined with 10 respiratory phases lead to a mean geometric and dosimetric spill of 43% and 35%, respectively. For cardiac radioablation, the use of two extreme cardiac phases combined with 10 respiratory phases is a robust approach to generate a cardiorespiratory ITV. The use of a single cardiac phase with or without fixed margin expansion is not recommended based on this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and PurposeStereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has been suggested as a promising therapeutic alternative in cases of failed catheter ablation for recurrent ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. Cyberknife® robotic radiosurgery system utilizing target tracking technology is one of the available STAR treatment platforms. Tracking using implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead tip as target surrogate marker is affected by the deformation of marker–target geometry. A simple method to account for the deformation in the target definition process is proposed.MethodsRadiotherapy planning CT series include scans at expiration and inspiration breath hold, and three free-breathing scans. All secondary series are triple registered to the primary CT: 6D/spine + 3D translation/marker + 3D translation/target surrogate—a heterogeneous structure around the left main coronary artery. The 3D translation difference between the last two registrations reflects the deformation between the marker and the target (surrogate) for the respective respiratory phase. Maximum translation differences in each direction form an anisotropic geometry deformation margin (GDM) to expand the initial single-phase clinical target volume (CTV) to create an internal target volume (ITV) in the dynamic coordinates of the marker. Alternative GDM-based target volumes were created for seven recent STAR patients and compared to the original treated planning target volumes (PTVs) as well as to analogical volumes created using deformable image registration (DIR) by MIM® and Velocity® software. Intra- and inter-observer variabilities of the triple registration process were tested as components of the final ITV to PTV margin.ResultsA margin of 2 mm has been found to cover the image registration observer variability. GDM-based target volumes are larger and shifted toward the inspiration phase relative to the original clinical volumes based on a 3-mm isotropic margin without deformation consideration. GDM-based targets are similar (mean DICE similarity coefficient range 0.80–0.87) to their equivalents based on the DIR of the primary target volume delineated by dedicated software.ConclusionThe proposed GDM method is a simple way to account for marker–target deformation-related uncertainty for tracking with Cyberknife® and better control of the risk of target underdose. The principle applies to general radiotherapy as well.

The major aim of radiation therapy is to provide curative or palliative treatment to cancerous malignancies while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Charged particle radiotherapy utilizing carbon ions or protons is uniquely suited for this task due to its ability to achieve highly conformal dose distributions around the tumor volume. For these treatment modalities, uncertainties in the localization of patient anatomy due to inter- and intra-fractional motion present a heightened risk of undesired dose delivery. A diverse range of mitigation strategies have been developed and clinically implemented in various disease sites to monitor and correct for patient motion, but much work remains. This review provides an overview of current clinical practices for inter and intra-fractional motion management in charged particle therapy, including motion control, current imaging and motion tracking modalities, as well as treatment planning and delivery techniques. We also cover progress to date on emerging technologies including particle-based radiography imaging, novel treatment delivery methods such as tumor tracking and FLASH, and artificial intelligence and discuss their potential impact towards improving or increasing the challenge of motion mitigation in charged particle therapy.

Background and purposeThe impact of audiovisual (AV) biofeedback on four dimensional (4D) positron emission tomography (PET) and 4D computed tomography (CT) image quality was investigated in a prospective clinical trial (NCT01172041).Material and methods4D-PET and 4D-CT images of ten lung cancer patients were acquired with AV biofeedback (AV) and free breathing (FB). The 4D-PET images were analyzed for motion artifacts by comparing 4D to 3D PET for gross tumor volumes (GTVPET) and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax). The 4D-CT images were analyzed for artifacts by comparing normalized cross correlation-based scores (NCCS) and quantifying a visual assessment score (VAS). A Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used for statistical testing.ResultsThe impact of AV biofeedback varied widely. Overall, the 3D to 4D decrease of GTVPET was 1.2±1.3cm(3) with AV and 0.6±1.8cm(3) for FB. The 4D-PET increase of SUVmax was 1.3±0.9 with AV and 1.3±0.8 for FB. The 4D-CT NCCS were 0.65±0.27 with AV and 0.60±0.32 for FB (p=0.08). The 4D-CT VAS was 0.0±2.7.ConclusionThis study demonstrated a high patient dependence on the use of AV biofeedback to reduce motion artifacts in 4D imaging. None of the hypotheses tested were statistically significant. Future development of AV biofeedback will focus on optimizing the human-computer interface and including patient training sessions for improved comprehension and compliance.

Proton fields delivered by the active scanning technique can be interfered with the intrafractional motion. This in-silico study seeks to mitigate the dosimetric impacts of motion artifacts, especially its interplay with the time-modulated dose delivery. Here four-dimensional (4d) robust optimization and dose repainting, which is the multiple application of the same field with reduced fluence, were combined. Two types of repainting were considered: layered and volumetric repainting. The time-resolved dose calculation, which is necessary to quantify the interplay effect, was integrated into the treatment planning system and validated. Nine clinical cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showing motion in the range of 0.4–1.5 cm were studied. It was found that the repainted delivery of 4D robustly optimized plans reduced the impact of interplay effect as quantified by the homogeneity index within the clinical target volume (CTV) to a tolerable level. Similarly, the fractional over- and underdosage was reduced sufficiently for some HCC cases to achieve the purpose of motion management. This holds true for both investigated types of repainting with small dosimetric advantages of volume repainting over layered repainting. Volume repainting, however, cannot be applied clinically in proton centers with slow energy changes. Thus, it served as a reference in the in-silico evaluation. It is recommended to perform the dynamic dose calculation for individual cases to judge if robust optimization in conjunction with repainting is sufficient to keep the interplay effect within bounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]