Search

Purpose: To report a single-center experience with non-thyroid causes of extraocular muscle enlargement (EME), describing the association between clinical-radiological findings at presentation and the final histopathological diagnosis., Methods: Retrospective consecutive case series of 59 patients with single or multiple EME on orbital imaging, in the absence of an etiological diagnosis at the time of presentation. All patients were submitted to orbital muscle biopsy in order to achieve a final etiological diagnosis. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of thyroid-associated orbitopathy and vascular causes of EME which were angiographically and clinically diagnosed were excluded. Orbital ultrasound and radiologic evaluation (CT and/or MRI) were performed before surgery in all cases. Main outcomes measured included initial clinical-radiological findings and final histopathological features of EME., Results: A diagnosis of lymphoma was confirmed in 13 cases (22%). Sixteen cases (27%) were diagnosed as orbital inflammatory disease including nonspecific idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease in 9 cases, IgG4-related disease in 4 cases, and sclerosing idiopathic orbital inflammatory disease in 3 cases. In 11 patients (18%), a diagnosis of metastatic tumor was made, whereas sarcoidosis, vascular malformations, Erdheim-Chester, and necrobiotic xanthogranuloma were diagnosed in 8 eyes (13.5%). Three patients (5%) with single muscle enlargement developed Graves disease 10 months later. Four patients (6.7%) were diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis. In 2 cases (3.3%), the diagnosis was unknown, with inconclusive biopsy results. Differential patterns for inflammatory/vascular, lymphomatous and metastatic EME were identified based on age and gender distribution and clinical-radiological characteristics at presentation., Conclusions: Initial clinical and radiological features may orientate the differential diagnosis of non-thyroid EME.

Purpose: To evaluate hyperreflective retinal spots (HRS), in normal subjects and diabetic patients without and with macular edema (diabetic macular edema, DME), on linear B-scans and corresponding en face image of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography., Methods: Retrospective evaluation of images of 54 eyes/subjects (16 normal subjects, 19 diabetic patients without DME, and 19 with DME). On horizontal B-scan spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, passing through the center of the fovea, the following characteristics of HRS were evaluated: location (inner retina or outer retina), size (≤30 or >30 μm), reflectivity (similar to nerve fiber layer or to retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch complex), and presence or absence of back shadowing. On en face spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, the following patterns were evaluated: 1) isolated HRS (not corresponding to any visible lesion); 2) HRS corresponding to a segment of retinal capillary or microaneurysm wall; and 3) HRS corresponding to hard exudate. All gradings were performed twice by two graders in a masked fashion., Results: Size ≤30 μm, reflectivity similar to nerve fiber layer, and absence of back shadowing were associated with absence of vessels or any other lesion on en face image (P = 0.0001 for all). Size >30 μm, reflectivity similar to retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch complex, presence of back shadowing, and location in the outer retina were all associated with presence of hard exudate on en face imaging (P < 0.0001 for all). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that HRS present in the inner retina (P < 0.0001), size >30 μm (P = 0.0029), and presence of back shadowing (P < 0.0001) are directly associated with presence of microaneurysms on en face image. Intragrader and intergrader repeatability were excellent for all evaluations., Conclusion: Hyperreflective retinal spots ≤30 μm, reflectivity similar to nerve fiber layer, and absence of back shadowing may represent activated microglial cells; HRS >30 μm, reflectivity similar to retinal pigment epithelium-Bruch complex, presence of back shadowing, and location in the outer retina may represent hard exudate; HRS >30 μm, presence of back shadowing, and location in the inner retina may represent microaneurysms. These hypotheses may be tested in further studies.

Purpose: To better pathophysiologically characterize macular edema secondary to eye irradiation, analyzing the presence of optical coherence tomography (OCT) hyperreflective spots., Methods: Twenty-five consecutive eyes affected by radiation maculopathy, secondary to irradiation for a primary uveal melanoma, without macular involvement in the irradiation field, were consecutively enrolled. All subjects underwent full ophthalmologic examination, including fluorescein angiography, color fundus photography, and spectral domain OCT, even in en face modality. Optical coherence tomography central subfield thickness was stratified into the following 3 categories: <400 μm, 400 to 600 μm, and >600 μm. Spectral domain OCT images were analyzed to measure and localize hyperreflective spots by two independent masked graders., Results: Hyperreflective spots were documented in all eyes (100%). Hyperreflective spots significantly increased in number according to OCT central subfield thickness (<400 μm, 400-600 μm, >600 μm, P < 0.05). The intergrader agreement was at least substantial for all measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.80)., Conclusion: Spectral domain OCT documents discrete intraretinal reflectivity changes (hyperreflective spots) in all (studied) eyes affected by radiation maculopathy. Hyperreflective spots increase in number with increasing central subfield thickness and could be considered as a new clinical biomarker of intraretinal inflammation in patients affected by macular edema secondary to irradiation for uveal melanoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the presence of hyperreflective spots (HRS) in diabetic patients without clinically detectable retinopathy (no DR) or with nonproliferative mild to moderate retinopathy (DR) without macular edema, and compare the results to controls., Methods: 36 subjects were enrolled: 12 with no DR, 12 with DR, and 12 normal subjects who served as controls. All studied subjects underwent full ophthalmologic examination and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). SD-OCT images were analyzed to measure and localize HRS. Each image was analyzed by two independent, masked examiners., Results: The number of HRS was significantly higher in both diabetics without and with retinopathy versus controls (P < 0.05) and in diabetics with retinopathy versus diabetics without retinopathy (P < 0.05). The HRS were mainly located in the inner retina layers (inner limiting membrane, ganglion cell layer, and inner nuclear layer). The intraobserver and interobserver agreement was almost perfect (κ > 0.9)., Conclusions: SD-OCT hyperreflective spots are present in diabetic eyes even when clinical retinopathy is undetectable. Their number increases with progressing retinopathy. Initially, HRS are mainly located in the inner retina, where the resident microglia is present. With progressing retinopathy, HRS reach the outer retinal layer. HRS may represent a surrogate of microglial activation in diabetic retina.