Search

Background/Aims: Some previous studies have reported that hysterectomy predicts increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, but the findings are disputed. We aimed to examine associations between hysterectomy and cardiovascular disease in a Norwegian cross-sectional health study. Methods: The data were obtained from the population-based cross-sectional Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT-2 Study). Of 46,709 invited females, 35,280 (76%) participated; 939 (3%) reported hysterectomy without oophorectomy (exposed women). Each exposed woman was age-matched with four randomly chosen women (n = 3,756) without hysterectomy or oophorectomy. Oophorectomy and hysterectomy status was self-reported by the women. Hazard ratio for cardiovascular diseases was calculated by Cox regression analyses with hysterectomy as a time-dependent covariate. Results: Median time since hysterectomy was 14 years (range 0-56 years). We calculated a significantly larger cumulative probability of cardiovascular diseases after hysterectomy with a hazard ratio of 1.92, 95% CI (1.51-2.38) after adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, age, use of hormonal replacement therapy and positive family history of myocardial infarction). Conclusion: Women had a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular diseases after hysterectomy compared to age-matched controls. Studies with longitudinal design and confirmed medical outcome data are needed. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To validate self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy., Design: Validation study., Setting: Large population-based cohort study in Norway: The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)., Population: The Trøndelag Health Study 2 and 3 (HUNT2 and HUNT3) included questions on gynaecological history. Women who answered questions regarding hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy were included. In total, 30 263 women were included from HUNT2 (1995-1997) and 23 138 from HUNT3 (2006-2008), of which 16 261 attended both HUNT2 and HUNT3., Methods: We compared self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy with electronic hospital procedure codes., Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy, by comparing with hospital procedure codes., Results: Self-reported hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in HUNT2 and/or HUNT3 both had specificity and negative predictive value above 99%. Self-reported hysterectomy had a sensitivity of 95.9%, and for bilateral oophorectomy sensitivity was 91.2%. Positive predictive value of self-reported hysterectomy was 85.8%, but for self-reported bilateral oophorectomy it was 65.4%., Conclusions: Self-reported hysterectomy corresponded quite well with hospital data and can be used in epidemiological studies. Self-reported bilateral oophorectomy, on the other hand, had low positive predictive value, and results based on such data should be interpreted with caution. Women who report no previous hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy can safely be classified as unexposed to these surgeries., (© 2024 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)