Search

Your search keyword '"Miah,Saiful"' showing total 300 results
Start Over Author "Miah,Saiful"
300 results on '"Miah,Saiful"'

57. MP27-10 DIRECT AND MARGINAL COST ANALYSIS OF NOT AIMING FOR THE TARGET IN A MRI-TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY PATHWAY

Author

Connor*, Martin J., primary, Eldred-Evans, David, additional, Feargus, Hosking-Jervis, additional, Bass, Edward, additional, Reddy, Deepika, additional, Bertoncelli Tanaka, Mariana, additional, Bhola-Stewart, Heather, additional, Maynard, William, additional, Khoo, Christopher, additional, Shah, Taimur T., additional, Lee, Jae, additional, Sri, Denosshan, additional, Powell, Laura, additional, Ahmad, Shahzad, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, Noureldin, Mohamed, additional, Joshi, Suchita, additional, Pegers, Elizabeth, additional, Wong, Kathie, additional, Tam, Henry, additional, Hrouda, David, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Carton, James, additional, Gordon, Steve, additional, Qazi, Hasan, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim U., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

59. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial

Author

Lovegrove, Catherine E., primary, Miah, Saiful, additional, El-Shater Bosaily, Ahmed, additional, Bott, Simon, additional, Brown, Louise, additional, Burns-Cox, Nick, additional, Dudderidge, Tim, additional, Freeman, Alex, additional, Henderson, Alastair, additional, Hindley, Richard, additional, Kaplan, Richard, additional, Kirkham, Alex, additional, Oldroyd, Rob, additional, Parker, Chris, additional, Persad, Raj, additional, Punwani, Shonit, additional, Rosario, Derek, additional, Shergill, Iqbal, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Emberton, Mark, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim U., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

60. Likert vs PI‐RADS v2: a comparison of two radiological scoring systems for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Author

Khoo, Christopher C., primary, Eldred‐Evans, David, additional, Peters, Max, additional, Bertoncelli Tanaka, Mariana, additional, Noureldin, Mohamed, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, Shah, Taimur, additional, Connor, Martin J., additional, Reddy, Deepika, additional, Clark, Martin, additional, Lakhani, Amish, additional, Rockall, Andrea, additional, Hosking‐Jervis, Feargus, additional, Cullen, Emma, additional, Arya, Manit, additional, Hrouda, David, additional, Qazi, Hasan, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Tam, Henry, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim U., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

61. What factors influence UK medical students’ choice of foundation school?

Author

Miah, Saiful, Pang, Karl H, Rebello, Wayne, Rubakumar, Zoe, Fung, Victoria, Venugopal, Suresh, and Begum, Hena

Subjects
location of training, foundation school, UK postgraduate training, social relationships, Original Research
Abstract

Background We aimed to identify the factors influencing UK medical student applicants’ choice of foundation school. We also explored the factors that doctors currently approaching the end of their 2-year program believe should be considered. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted during the 2013–2014 academic year. An online questionnaire was distributed to 2092 final-year medical students from nine UK medical schools and 84 foundation year-2 (FY2) doctors from eight foundation schools. Participants were asked to rank their top 3 from a list of 12 factors that could potentially influence choice of foundation school on a 5-point Likert scale. Collated categorical data from the two groups were compared using a chi-square test with Yates correction. Results Geographic location was overwhelmingly the most important factor for medical students and FY2 doctors with 97.2% and 98.8% in agreement, respectively. Social relationships played a pivotal role for medical student applicants. Clinical specialties within the rotations were of less importance to medical students, in comparison to location and social relationships. In contrast, FY2 doctors placed a significantly greater importance on the specialties undertaken in their 2-year training program, when compared to medical students (chi-square; p=0.0001). Conclusion UK medical schools should make their foundation program applicants aware of the importance of choosing rotations based on specialties that will be undertaken. Individual foundation schools could provide a more favorable linked application system and greater choice and flexibility of specialties within their 2-year program, potentially making their institution more attractive to future applicants.

Published
2017

62. Is the educational performance measure a fair way of assessing candidates applying to the United Kingdom Foundation Programme? [Letter]

Author

Miah,Saiful, Boxall,Nicholas E, Lamb,Benjamin W, Miah,Saiful, Boxall,Nicholas E, and Lamb,Benjamin W

Abstract

Saiful Miah, Nicholas E Boxall, Benjamin W LambDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UKWe read with great interest and are in agreement with the article by Ismail and Patel1 who have highlighted the potential issues and pitfalls in using a situational judgment test (SJT) when stratifying medical students for the first stage of their postgraduate medical training. We would like to bring to their attention an equally important assessment in the application process, the United Kingdom Foundation Programme (UKFP).View the original paper by Ismail and Patel

Published
2019

63. Surgical healthcare needs for transgender patients: surgeons’ perspectives

Author

Gresty,Helena, Miah,Saiful, Morley,Roland, Gresty,Helena, Miah,Saiful, and Morley,Roland

Abstract

Helena Gresty, Saiful Miah, Roland Morley Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London W6 8RF, UKWe read with great interest the article by Dubin et al,1 who highlighted the specific healthcare needs and barriers the transgender population continues to face. Our department is the largest surgical provider in Europe for those transgender patients requiring male-to-female genital reconstruction surgery and would like to provide our unique perspective.2Authors’ replyShane D Morrison1 Samuel N Dubin2 Ian T Nolan2 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; 2New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USAWe thank Dr Miah et al for their insightful perspective on gender-minority healthcare education among surgical trainees in response to our article.1View the original paper by Dubin and colleagues.

Published
2019

64. UK medical students’ perceptions, attitudes, and interest toward medical leadership and clinician managers

Author

Rouhani,Maral J, Burleigh,Eleanor J, Hobbis,Chloe, Dunford,Charlotte, Osman,Nadir I, Gan,Christine, Gibbons,Norma B, Ahmed,Hashim U, and Miah,Saiful

Subjects
education, Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract

Maral J Rouhani,1 Eleanor J Burleigh,2 Chloe Hobbis,2 Charlotte Dunford,1 Nadir I Osman,3 Christine Gan,1 Norma B Gibbons,1 Hashim U Ahmed,1,4 Saiful Miah1,5 1Department of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK; 2Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 3Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK; 4Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; 5Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK Background: We aimed to determine UK medical students’ perceptions and attitudes and interest toward medical leadership and clinician managers. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the academic year 2015–2016. An online questionnaire was distributed to 2,349 final-year students from 10 UK medical schools. Participants were asked to complete a 5-point Likert scale on their current perceptions, attitudes, and interest toward medical leadership and clinician managers. They were also asked to self-rate their leadership competences set by the Medical Leadership Competency Framework and to rate the quality of management and leadership training they received from their medical school. Results: In total, we received 114 complete responses. Only 7.9% of respondents were in agreement (strongly agree or agree) when asked whether they felt they were well informed about what a managerial position in medicine entails. When asked whether clinicians should influence managerial decisions within a clinical setting, 94.7% of respondents were in agreement with the statement. About 85% of respondents were in agreement that it is important for clinicians to have managerial or leadership responsibilities, with 63.2% of students in agreement that they would have liked more management or leadership training during medical school. Over half the respondents rated their management and leadership training they received during medical school as “very poor” or “poor” (54.4%). Conclusion: Our study suggests that UK medical students have an appetite for management and leadership training and appreciate its importance but feel that the training they are receiving is poor. This suggests that there is a gap between the demand for management and leadership training and the quality of training supplied by UK medical schools. Keywords: medical leadership, clinician managers, medical student, training

Published
2018

67. Early-Medium-Term Outcomes of Primary Focal Cryotherapy to Treat Nonmetastatic Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer from a Prospective Multicentre Registry

Author

Shah, Taimur T., primary, Peters, Max, additional, Eldred-Evans, David, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, Yap, Tet, additional, Faure-Walker, Nicholas A., additional, Hosking-Jervis, Feargus, additional, Thomas, Benjamin, additional, Dudderidge, Tim, additional, Hindley, Richard G., additional, McCracken, Stuart, additional, Greene, Damian, additional, Nigam, Raj, additional, Valerio, Massimo, additional, Minhas, Suks, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Arya, Manit, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim U., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

68. MP78-10 A COMPARISON OF CANCER CONTROL OUTCOMES AT 5 YEARS OF FOCAL THERAPY (USING HIFU & CRYOTHERAPY) TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT NON-METASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER: PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS

Author

Shah, Taimur T., primary, Peters, Max, additional, Reddy*, Deepika, additional, Ball, Daniel, additional, Kim, Annie, additional, Gomez, Enrique Gomez, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, Eldred-Evans, David, additional, Guillaumier, Stephanie, additional, Hosking-Jervis, Feargus, additional, van Rossum, Peter S.N., additional, Dudderidge, Tim, additional, Hindley, Richard, additional, Stuart, McCracken, additional, Damian, Greene, additional, Nigam, Raj, additional, Valerio, Massimo, additional, Minhas, Suks, additional, Afzal, Naveed, additional, Lewi, Henry, additional, McCartan, Neil, additional, Ogden, Chris, additional, Persad, Raj, additional, Virdi, Jaspal, additional, Moore, Caroline, additional, Arya, Manit, additional, Emberton, Mark, additional, Ahmed, Hashim U., additional, and Winkler, Mathias, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

69. PD60-01 LIKERT VS. PI-RADS V2: A COMPARISON OF TWO RADIOLOGICAL SCORING SYSTEMS FOR DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER

Author

Khoo*, Christopher Charles, primary, Eldred-Evans, David, additional, Jaenicke, Johannes, additional, Tanaka, Mariana Bertoncelli, additional, Shah, Taimur Tariq, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, Connor, Martin, additional, Reddy, Deepika, additional, Noureldin, Mohammed, additional, Sethi, Joanne, additional, Forde, Alexandra, additional, Bhola-Stewart, Heather, additional, Smith, Andrew, additional, Carton, James, additional, Lloyd, Josephine, additional, Mannion, Ethna, additional, Hosking-Jervis, Feargus, additional, Cullen, Emma, additional, Cartwright, Rufus, additional, Clark, Martin, additional, Arya, Manit, additional, Hrouda, David, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Tam, Henry, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim Uddin, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

70. MP30-08 COMPARISON OF TRUS-BIOPSY TO TRANSPERINEAL TEMPLATE MAPPING BIOPSIES STRATIFIED BY MRI SCORE WITHIN THE PROMIS TRIAL

Author

Lovegrove*, Catherine, primary, Brown, Louise, additional, Miah, Saiful, additional, El-Shater Bosaily, Ahmed, additional, Kaplan, Richard, additional, Freeman, Alex, additional, Kirkham, Alex, additional, Winkler, Mathias, additional, Persad, Raj, additional, Hindley, Richard, additional, Oldroyd, Robert, additional, Dudderidge, Tim, additional, Rosario, Derek, additional, Burns-Cox, Nick, additional, Shergill, Iqbal, additional, Bott, Simon, additional, Henderson, Alastair, additional, Parker, Christopher, additional, Emberton, Mark, additional, and Ahmed, Hashim, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results