51. Registered Replication Report on Srull and Wyer (1979)
- Author
-
Ewout H. Meijer, Katherine Wick, Wolf Vanpaemel, Tei Laine, John J. Skowronski, Irene Scopelliti, Felix Holzmeister, Sara Gomes, Michael Kirchler, Oguz Ali Acar, Gustav Tinghög, Kevin Vezirian, Galit Nahari, Katherine Hoogesteyn, Rafaele J. C. Huntjens, Laurent Bègue, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Rita Pasion, Charlotte Rebecca Pennington, Marton Kovacs, Andrea Isoni, Peter Szecsi, Daniel Västfjäll, Sean Coary, Alain Van Hiel, Nir Rozmann, Eli Spiegelman, Ariane Jim, Lara Warmelink, Ryan K. Jessup, Ulrich S. Tran, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Neil Marvin McLatchie, Jean-Christian Tisserand, David D. Loschelder, Mario Mechtel, Fernando Ferreira-Santos, Arne Roets, Lisa Blatz, Bruno Verschuere, Noa Feldman, Marta Gonzalez-Iraizoz, Elliot Andrew Ludvig, Fernando Barbosa, Ezgi Yıldız, Angela Sutan, Robin Orthey, Thomas Verliefde, Bradford J. Wiggins, Angie R. Birt, Kristina Suchotzki, Martin Voracek, Aline Claesen, Jan Crusius, Jacqueline R. Evans, Samuel L. Clay, Ernest Baskin, Coby Gerlsma, Monty L. Lynn, Balazs Aczel, Scott D. Martin, Steve D. Charman, Matthias Gamer, Lina Koppel, Bence E. Bakos, Juergen Huber, Frank Lentz, Nathalie klein Selle, Keith Wylie, Randy J. McCarthy, Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Universidade do Porto, Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie : Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social (LIP-PC2S ), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Department of Community Sexual and Reproductive Health, Lewisham Primary Care Trust, London, Burgundy School of Business (BSB) - Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Dijon Bourgogne (ESC) (BSB), Centre de REcherches sur les Stratégies Economiques (EA 3190) (CRESE), Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC)-Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] (UBFC), Equipe Autre (R&D), Sciences et Technologies de la Musique et du Son (STMS), Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique (IRCAM)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Section Forensic Psychology, and RS: FPN CPS IV
- Subjects
Economics ,Impression formation ,BF ,050109 social psychology ,Hostility ,050105 experimental psychology ,Replication (statistics) ,medicine ,Formerly Health & Social Sciences ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Big Five personality traits ,hostility, priming, impression formation, replication, many labs, open data, open materials, preregistered ,Set (psychology) ,General Psychology ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Psychological Sciences Research Group ,Business psychology ,05 social sciences ,Vignette ,[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology ,medicine.symptom ,Psychology ,Priming (psychology) ,Social psychology - Abstract
Srull and Wyer (1979) demonstrated that exposing participants to more hostility-related stimuli caused them subsequently to interpret ambiguous behaviors as more hostile. In their Experiment 1, participants descrambled sets of words to form sentences. In one condition, 80% of the descrambled sentences described hostile behaviors, and in another condition, 20% described hostile behaviors. Following the descrambling task, all participants read a vignette about a man named Donald who behaved in an ambiguously hostile manner and then rated him on a set of personality traits. Next, participants rated the hostility of various ambiguously hostile behaviors (all ratings on scales from 0 to 10). Participants who descrambled mostly hostile sentences rated Donald and the ambiguous behaviors as approximately 3 scale points more hostile than did those who descrambled mostly neutral sentences. This Registered Replication Report describes the results of 26 independent replications ( N = 7,373 in the total sample; k = 22 labs and N = 5,610 in the primary analyses) of Srull and Wyer’s Experiment 1, each of which followed a preregistered and vetted protocol. A random-effects meta-analysis showed that the protagonist was seen as 0.08 scale points more hostile when participants were primed with 80% hostile sentences than when they were primed with 20% hostile sentences (95% confidence interval, CI = [0.004, 0.16]). The ambiguously hostile behaviors were seen as 0.08 points less hostile when participants were primed with 80% hostile sentences than when they were primed with 20% hostile sentences (95% CI = [−0.18, 0.01]). Although the confidence interval for one outcome excluded zero and the observed effect was in the predicted direction, these results suggest that the currently used methods do not produce an assimilative priming effect that is practically and routinely detectable.
- Published
- 2018