Search

Background: Microdialysis sampling after drug microdosing may provide tissue pharmacokinetic data early in clinical drug development. However, low administered doses and small sample volumes pose an analytical challenge, particularly for highly protein-bound drugs. Materials & methods: Carbon-14 [14C]diclofenac was used as a model drug to assess the technical and analytical feasibility of in vivo microdialysis after microdose administration in an in vitro setup. Results: [14C]diclofenac dialysate concentrations were accurately quantified with accelerator MS. [14C]diclofenac dialysate recoveries were similar in the presence and absence of therapeutic diclofenac concentrations but were considerably decreased when albumin was added to the immersion solution, suggesting high protein binding. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the feasibility of combining microdosing and microdialysis to assess tissue pharmacokinetics.

Purpose Clinical research relies on data from patients and volunteers, yet the target sample size is often not achieved. Here, we assessed the perception of clinical research among clinical trial participants to improve the recruitment process for future studies. Methods We conducted a single-center descriptive and exploratory study of 300 current or former participants in various phase I–III clinical trials. Questionnaires were either distributed to current clinical trial participants or emailed to former subjects. Results Subjects strongly agreed or agreed that contributing to improving medical care (> 81%), contributing to scientific research (> 79%), and trusting their treating physicians (> 77%) were motives for study participation. Among healthy volunteers, financial motives positively correlated with the number of clinical trials they had participated in (p p Conclusion Altruistic motives and trust in treating physicians were predominant motives for clinical trial participation. Older patients expected to receive the best available treatment during participation. Healthy volunteers who reported financial motives had participated in more clinical trials. Consistent with great trust in medical staff and government research institutions, little concern was expressed about the misuse of personal data during the trial.

Rabbits are frequently used for the examination of the pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of antibiotic substances. However, antibiotics vary substantially in protein binding affecting the concentration of the antimicrobially effective unbound drug. We hypothesized that the binding properties of vancomycin, meropenem and ceftriaxone might vary between human and rabbit plasma. In an in-vitro study we observed dose dependent variability in protein binding of antibiotics between species. Thus, in-vitro-pre-studies are required to guarantee for translational conditions.

Several studies investigated diclofenac tissue concentrations using microdialysis (MD). However, thorough evaluations of the optimal MD set-up for diclofenac are unavailable. Thus, this in vitro MD study aimed to compare different set-ups to improve quantitative recovery of diclofenac. In forward and reverse in vitro MD experiments with diclofenac at two concentrations (1 and 100 ng/ml), the perfusion solutions physiological saline 0.9% (PS) and human albumin 1% (HSA) were compared using tissue probes (10-mm membrane) and customized intravenous (iv) probes (30-mm membrane). Using PS, the mean relative recovery of diclofenac at 1 ng/ml was 1.6% ± 0.04% and 3.12% ± 0.00% with the tissue probe and the iv probe, respectively. The respective mean relative recovery for diclofenac at 100 ng/ml was 0.02% ± 0.01% and 0.21% ± 0.11%. Using HSA, the mean relative recovery was 314% ± 25% (tissue probe) and 1064% ± 97% (iv probe) for diclofenac at 1 ng/ml and 444% ± 91% and 1415% ± 217% for diclofenac at 100 ng/ml. In reverse dialysis using PS, the mean relative loss of diclofenac was 99.2% ± 0.5% (tissue probe) and 95.8% ± 1.7% (iv probe). Using HSA, the mean relative loss was -4.4% ± 7.2% and 0.2% ± 7.5%, respectively. PS and HSA were not suitable perfusion solutions for quantification of absolute diclofenac concentrations. Despite methodological challenges, HSA may be used for comparative experiments or bioequivalence studies.

Pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled trials (PF-RCT) are important in the fight against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative infections. Some recently approved antibiotics and older generic antibiotics with activity against CR Gram-negative bacteria were investigated in PF-RCTs in a variety of infections. We searched Pubmed, Cochrane database and international clinical trial databases for PF-RCTs for the period between 2005 and 2020 and compared the study designs, patient populations, infection types, pathogens, and Day-28 all-cause mortality (ACM). PF-RCTs are particularly challenging to quantitatively assess and compare due to the heterogeneity in infection types, pathogens, CR mechanism, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and endpoints. Data interpretation is further complicated by lack of formal statistical analysis plans and/or non-inferiority design, and limited power across most PF-RCTs. The studies with new antibiotics (i.e. plazomicin, meropenem/vaborbactam, cefiderocol) ranked lower regarding feasibility, with relatively small sample sizes (analyzed: 37–118) versus the comparative effectiveness studies of older generic drugs (analyzed: 94–406). ACM ranged between 11.8% and 40% for CR Enterobacterales, 17.7% and 57.4% for CR Acinetobacter spp., and 20.0% and 30.8% for CR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The information gathered must be considered carefully alongside the study limitations and caution should be exercised when making direct comparisons across trials. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY New antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections are needed because antimicrobial resistance has become a global threat. In recent years, several pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled clinical trials were conducted to test new antibiotics or combinations of older generic antibiotics in the fight against resistant bacteria. However, these trials were exceptionally challenging and most of them enrolled relatively few patients. These studies were highly heterogeneous in terms of species, antibiotics, infection site, mechanism of resistance, endpoints and patient factors. In these trials, all-cause mortality at Day 28 or Day 30 were numerically lower with the new antibiotics in infections caused by carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales. However, in the trials which investigated CR Acinetobacter spp. infections, there was no reduction in all-cause mortality at Day 28 or Day 30 with combinations of older generic antibiotics compared with colistin monotherapy. Limited information was available for CR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. More pathogen-focused, randomized, controlled clinical trials with more feasible design and higher patient numbers are needed to demonstrate clinical benefit in drug-resistant infections.

Transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are of concern in antimicrobial drug development, as they can have serious safety consequences. We used positron emission tomography (PET) imaging-based pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis to assess the effect of different drugs, which may cause transporter-mediated DDIs, on the tissue distribution and excretion of [ 18 F]ciprofloxacin as a radiolabeled model antimicrobial drug.

Background and objectives: A quantitative evaluation of the PK of meropenem, a broad-spectrum ��-lactam antibiotic, in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients is lacking as of date. The objective of this study was the characterisation of meropenem population pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF in obese and non-obese patients for identification of adequate dosing regimens via Monte-Carlo simulations. Methods: We obtained plasma and microdialysate concentrations after administration of meropenem 1000 mg to 15 obese and 15 non-obese surgery patients from a prospective clinical trial. After characterizing plasma- and microdialysis-derived ISF pharmacokinetics via population pharmacokinetic analysis, we simulated thrice-daily (TID) meropenem short-term (0.5 h), prolonged (3.0 h), and continuous infusions. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) analysis based on time unbound concentrations exceeded minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) on treatment day 1 (%fT > MIC) and the sum of PTA weighted by relative frequency of MIC values for infections by pathogens commonly treated with meropenem. To avoid interstitial tissue fluid concentrations below MIC for the entire dosing interval during continuous infusions, a more conservative PK/PD index was selected (%fT > 4 �� MIC). Results: Adjusted body weight (ABW) and calculated creatinine clearance (CLCRCG_ABW) of all patients (body mass index [BMI] = 20.5-81.5 kg/m2) explained a considerable proportion of the between-patient pharmacokinetic variability (15.1-31.0% relative reduction). The ISF:plasma ratio of %fT > MIC was relatively similar for MIC ��� 2 mg/L but decreased for MIC = 8 mg/L over ABW = 60-120 kg (0.50-0.20). Steady-state concentrations were 2.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-3.37) higher in plasma than in ISF, supporting PK/PD targets related to four times the MIC during continuous infusions to avoid suspected ISF concentrations constantly below the MIC. A 3000 mg/24 h continuous infusion was sufficient at MIC = 2 mg/L for patients with CLCRCG_ABW ��� 100 mL/min and ABW < 90 kg, whereas 2000 mg TID prolonged infusions were adequate for those with CLCRCG_ABW ��� 100 mL/min and ABW > 90 kg. For MIC = 2 mg/L and %fT> MIC = 95, PTA was adequate in patients over the entire investigated range of body mass and renal function using a 6000 mg continuous infusion. A prolonged infusion of meropenem 2000 mg TID was sufficient for MIC ��� 8 mg/L and all investigated ABW and CLCRCG_ABW when employing the PK/PD target %fT > MIC = 40. Short-term infusions of 1000 mg TID were sufficient for CLCRCG_ABW ��� 130 mL/min and distributions of MIC values for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Conclusions: This analysis indicated a need for higher doses (��� 2000 mg) and prolonged infusions (��� 3 h) for obese and non-obese patients at MIC ��� 2 mg/L. Higher PTA was achieved with prolonged infusions in obese patients and with continuous infusions in non-obese patients.

There is evidence that Staphylococcus aureus colonisation is linked to severity of atopic dermatitis. As no gold standard for S. aureus sampling on atopic dermatitis skin lesions exists, this study compared three commonly used methods. In addition, effectiveness of standard skin disinfection to remove S. aureus colonisation from these inflamed skin lesions was investigated. In 30 atopic dermatitis patients, three different S. aureus sampling methods, i.e. detergent scrubbing, moist swabbing and tape stripping, were performed on naïve and disinfected skin lesions. Two different S. aureus selective media, mannitol salt agar and chromID agar, were used for bacterial growing. Quantifying the S. aureus load varied significantly between the different sampling methods on naïve skin lesions ranging from mean 51 to 1.5 × 104 CFU/cm2 (p p S. aureus load (p S. aureus selection agar plates to implement further clinical studies for the effectiveness of topical anti-staphylococcal antibiotics. Other disinfection regimes should be considered in atopic dermatitis patients when complete de-colonisation of certain skin areas is required, e.g. for surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND The pan-European VACCELERATE network aims to implement the first transnational harmonized and sustainable vaccine trial Volunteer Registry, being a single entry point for potential volunteers of large-scale vaccine trials across Europe. This work exhibits a set of harmonized vaccine trial–related educational and promotional tools for the general public, designed and disseminated by the pan-European VACCELERATE network. OBJECTIVE This study primarily aimed to design and develop a standard toolkit to increase positive attitudes and access to trustworthy information for better access and increased recruitment to vaccine trials for the public. More specifically, the produced tools are focused on inclusiveness and equity, and are targeting different population groups, including underserved ones, as potential volunteers for the VACCELERATE Volunteer Registry (older individuals, migrants, children, and adolescents). The promotional and educational material is aligned with the main objectives of the Volunteer Registry to increase public literacy and awareness regarding vaccine-related clinical research or trials and trial participation, including informed consent and legal issues, side effects, and frequently asked questions regarding vaccine trial design. METHODS Tools were developed per the aims and principles of the VACCELERATE project, focusing on trial inclusiveness and equity, and are adjusted to local country-wise requirements to improve public health communication. The produced tools are selected based on the cognitive theory, inclusiveness, and equity of differently aged and underrepresented groups, and standardized material from several official trustworthy sources (eg, COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access; the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; the European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; and the World Health Organization). A team of multidisciplinary specialists (infectious diseases, vaccine research, medicine, and education) edited and reviewed the subtitles and scripts of the educational videos, extended brochures, interactive cards, and puzzles. Graphic designers selected the color palette, audio settings, and dubbing for the video story-tales and implemented QR codes. RESULTS This study presents the first set of harmonized promotional and educational materials and tools (ie, educational cards, educational and promotional videos, extended brochures, flyers, posters, and puzzles) for vaccine clinical research (eg, COVID-19 vaccines). These tools inform the public about possible benefits and disadvantages of trial participation and build confidence among participants about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and the health care system. This material has been translated into several languages and is intended to be freely and easily accessible to facilitate dissemination among VACCELERATE network participant countries and the European and global scientific, industrial, and public community. CONCLUSIONS The produced material could help fill knowledge gaps of health care personnel, providing the appropriate future patient education for vaccine trials, and tackling vaccine hesitancy and parents’ concerns for potential participation of children in vaccine trials.

Exhaustive pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in paediatric patients are unavailable for most antibiotics and feasibility of PK studies is limited by challenges, such as low blood volume and venipuncture-related pain. Microdialysis (MD) represents a promising method to overcome these obstacles. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to develop and validate modified MD catheters that can be used to obtain concentration-time profiles of antibiotics in paediatric patients.Following extensive in vitro MD experiments, a prospective open-labelled study in ten healthy adult volunteers (HVs) was conducted. Subjects received a single intravenous dose of 1000 mg vancomycin, then plasma and intravascular microdialysate were sampled over 24 h. In vivo MD probe calibration was conducted using the retrodialysis technique. Plasma protein binding was measured using ultrafiltration. Confirmation of the measurements was performed using a Bland-Altman plot, relevant PK parameters were calculated, and a pharmacometric model was established.No safety issues were encountered. The concentration-time curves of microdialysate and plasma measurements showed good alignment. The Bland-Altman plot yielded a mean bias of 0.19 mg/L and 95% limits of agreement of - 9.34 to 9.71 mg/L. A two-compartment model best described plasma PK, model-based estimates for recovery of the MD probes being in high agreement with the observed values. Quantified estimates of fraction unbound were comparable between plasma and microdialysate (p = 0.56).An innovative MD catheter that can be inserted into small intravenous lines was successfully developed and applied in HV. This proof-of-concept study is encouraging and opens the way to further experiments leading towards future use of MD in paediatric patients.

Drugs for the treatment of respiratory diseases are commonly administered by oral inhalation. Yet surprisingly little is known about the pulmonary pharmacokinetics of inhaled molecules. Nuclear medicine imaging techniques (i.e. planar gamma scintigraphy, single-photon emission computed tomography [SPECT] and positron emission tomography [PET]) enable the noninvasive dynamic measurement of the lung concentrations of radiolabeled drugs or drug formulations. This review discusses the potential of nuclear medicine imaging techniques in inhalation biopharmaceutical research.(i) Planar gamma scintigraphy studies with radiolabeled inhalation formulations to assess initial pulmonary drug deposition; (ii) imaging studies with radiolabeled drugs to assess their intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics; (iii) receptor occupancy studies to quantify the pharmacodynamic effect of inhaled drugs.Imaging techniques hold potential to bridge the knowledge gap between animal models and humans with respect to the pulmonary disposition of inhaled drugs. However, beyond the mere assessment of the initial lung deposition of inhaled formulations with planar gamma scintigraphy, imaging techniques have rarely been employed in pulmonary drug development. This may be related to several technical challenges encountered with such studies. Considering the wealth of information that can be obtained with imaging studies their use in inhalation biopharmaceutics should be further investigated.

Ceftaroline, approved to treat skin infections and pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has been considered for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed to describe ceftaroline soft tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) distributions and investigate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of the percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound drug concentration exceeded the MIC (%fT(>MIC)) to treat MRSA infections. Healthy subjects’ plasma and microdialysate concentrations from muscle and subcutaneous tissue following 600 mg every 12 h (q12h) and q8h and neurosurgical patients’ plasma and CSF concentrations following single 600-mg dosing were used. Plasma concentrations were described by a two-compartment model, and tissue concentrations were incorporated as three independent compartments linked to the central compartment by bidirectional transport (clearance in [CL(in)] and CL(out)). Apparent volumes were fixed to physiological interstitial values. Healthy status and body weight were identified as covariates for the volume of the central compartment, and creatinine clearance was identified for clearance. The CSF glucose concentration (GLUC) was inversely correlated with CL(in,CSF). Simulations showed a PTA of >90% in plasma and soft tissues for both regimens assuming an MIC of 1 mg/L and a %fT(>MIC) of 28.8%. Using the same target, patients with inflamed meninges (0.5

Background Inadequate antibiotic exposure in cerebral infections might have detrimental effects on clinical outcome. Commonly, antibiotic concentrations within the CSF were used to estimate cerebral target levels. However, the actual pharmacological active unbound drug concentration beyond the blood–brain barrier is unknown. Objectives To compare meropenem concentrations in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate of neurointensive care patients. Patients and methods In 12 patients suffering subarachnoid haemorrhage, 2000 mg of meropenem was administered every 8 h due to an extracerebral infection. Meropenem concentrations were determined in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate at steady state (n = 11) and following single-dose administration (n = 5). Results At steady state, the free AUC0–8 was 233.2 ± 42.7 mg·h/L in plasma, 7.8 ± 1.9 mg·h/L in CSF and 26.6 ± 14.0 mg·h/L in brain tissue. The brain tissue penetration ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma) was 0.11 ± 0.06, which was more than 3 times higher than in CSF (0.03 ± 0.01), resulting in an AUCCSF/AUCbrain ratio of 0.41 ± 0.16 at steady state. After single-dose administration similar proportions were achieved (AUCbrain/AUCplasma = 0.09 ± 0.08; AUCCSF/AUCplasma = 0.02 ± 0.00). Brain tissue concentrations correlated well with CSF concentrations (R = 0.74, P Conclusions Meropenem achieves sufficient bactericidal concentrations for the most common bacterial strains of cerebral infections in both plasma and brain tissue, even in non-inflamed brain tissue. CSF concentrations would highly underestimate the target site activity of meropenem beyond the blood–brain barrier.

To investigate immunogenicity and safety of BNT162b2 booster vaccination with and without a tetravalent influenza vaccine.A prospective, open-label cohort study on immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 booster vaccination with or without a tetravalent influenza vaccine was performed. 838 health care workers were included in the following study arms: BNT162b2 booster-only, influenza-vaccine-only or combination of both. Levels of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain (RBD), and haemagglutinine inhibition (HAI) tested for four different influenza strains (A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), B/Victoria, B/Yamagata) were measured at time of vaccination and four weeks later.After four weeks, median [IQR] anti-RBD antibody levels and relative change from baseline were higher in individuals who received BNTb162b2 booster vaccination only (absolute: 16,600 [10,980-24,360] vs. 12,630 [8,198-18,750] BAU/mL (p0·0001); relative increase: 49% [23·6-95·3] vs. 40% [21·9-80·6](p = 0·048); booster-only n=521 vs. combination-arm n=229 respectively). Results were confirmed after matching for sex, age, BMI, baseline antibody levels and vaccine compound received for primary immunization (absolute: 13,930 [10,610 - 22,760] vs. 12,520 [8,710 - 17,940]; p = 0·031); relative increase: 55·7% [27·8-98·5] vs. 42·2% [22·9-74·5]; p = 0·045). Adverse events were almost identical in the booster-only and the combination-arm, but numerically lower in the influenza arm (525/536[97·9] % vs.235/240 [97·9%] vs. 26/33 [78·8 %]).While no safety concerns occurred, our study provides evidence on reduced immunogenicity of a BNT162b2 booster vaccination in combination with a tetravalent influenza vaccine. Further studies investigating new influenza variants as well as potential differences vaccine effectiveness are needed.

Objectives The efficacy and quality of generic antibacterial drug formulations are often questioned by both healthcare specialists and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the interchangeability of generic drugs with their originators by comparing bioequivalence parameters and stability data of generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs. Methods In this open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study, three groups of 12 healthy volunteers each received a single intravenous infusion of either 2 g of cefepime or 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam and two generic formulations, or 600 mg of linezolid and one generic formulation. Plasma sampling was performed, with a 5 day washout period between study days. Stability was tested by storing reconstituted generic and originator products according to their own storage specifications and those of the comparator products. All concentrations were measured by LC-MS. Results Similar ratios of generic/originator (90% CI) Cmax were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [93.7 (88.4–99.4)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [95.9 (89.1–103.2)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [104.5 (91.1–119.9)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [95.9 (90.4–101.7)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.7 (84.9–104.7)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [93.4 (87.4–99.8)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [97.4 (89.7–105.8)]. Accordingly, similar ratios of AUC0–t were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [91.1 (87.6–94.8)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [97.9 (92.5–103.5)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [99.7 (93.3–106.6)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [92.2 (88.3–96.3)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.9 (97.0–102.8)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [91.4 (86.4–96.7)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [98.8 (94.3–103.6)]. Stable and similar concentrations were measured for all contiguous substances, regardless of storage conditions. Conclusions Compared with their respective originator drugs, generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam met the predetermined bioequivalence criteria. All formulations were stable under the storage conditions of their respective comparators.

Objectives To investigate ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetics (PK) in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of muscle and subcutaneous tissue and establish a population PK model. Methods Eight healthy volunteers received four IV doses of 1000/500 mg ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h in a prospective, open-labelled PK study. ISF concentration–time profiles were determined via in vivo microdialysis up to 8 h post-dose and efficacy of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam was estimated using the time above MIC (%ƒT>MIC) and time above threshold concentration (%T>CT), respectively. A population PK model was established by merging derived plasma and soft tissue PK data. Results Ceftolozane reached %ƒT>MIC values of 100% in plasma, muscle and subcutaneous ISF for Enterobacteriaceae and 87%, 89% and 87%, respectively, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Tazobactam %T>CT was 21%, 22% and 21% in plasma, muscle and subcutaneous ISF, respectively. Plasma protein binding was 6.3% for ceftolozane and 8.0% for tazobactam. Multiple-dose ceftolozane AUC0–8 ISF/plasma ratios were 0.92 ± 0.17 in muscle and 0.88 ± 0.18 in subcutis, and tazobactam ratios were 0.89 ± 0.25 in muscle and 0.87 ± 0.21 in subcutis, suggesting substantial soft tissue penetration. Conclusions Tazobactam %T>CT values were distinctly below proposed target values, indicating that tazobactam might be underdosed in the investigated drug combination. However, ISF/unbound plasma ratios of ceftolozane and tazobactam support their use in soft tissue infections. A plasma and soft tissue PK model adds important information on the PK profile of ceftolozane/tazobactam. Further investigations in patients suffering from wound infections are needed to confirm these findings.

Purpose AT04A and AT06A are two AFFITOPE® peptide vaccine candidates being developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia by inducing proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-specific antibodies. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, antibody development, and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) following four subcutaneous immunizations. Methods This phase I, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in a total of 72 healthy subjects with a mean fasting LDLc level at baseline of 117.1 mg/dL (range 77–196 mg/dL). Each cohort enrolled 24 subjects to receive three priming immunizations at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and to receive a single booster immunization at week 60 of either AT04A, AT06A, or placebo. In addition to safety (primary objective), the antigenic peptide- and PCSK9-specific antibody response and the impact on LDLc were evaluated over a period of 90 weeks. Results The most common systemic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported were fatigue, headache, and myalgia in 75% of subjects in the AT06A group and 58% and 46% of subjects in the placebo and AT04A groups, respectively. Injection site reactions (ISR) representing 63% of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), were transient and mostly of mild or moderate intensity and rarely severe (3%). Both active treatments triggered a robust, long-lasting antibody response towards the antigenic peptides used for immunization that optimally cross-reacted with the target epitope on PCSK9. In the AT04A group, a reduction in serum LDLc was observed with a mean peak reduction of 11.2% and 13.3% from baseline compared to placebo at week 20 and 70 respectively, and over the whole study period, the mean LDLc reduction for the AT04A group vs. placebo was −7.2% (95% CI [−10.4 to −3.9], P Conclusions Although both AT04A and AT06 were safe and immunogenic, only AT04A demonstrated significant LDLc-lowering activity, justifying further development. Trial registration EudraCT: 2015-001719-11. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02508896.

Introduction: Increasing resistance of gram-negative bacteria poses a serious threat to global health. Thus, efficacious and safe antibiotics against resistant pathogens are urgently needed. Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, addresses this unmet need.Areas covered: For this article, we screened all preclinical and clinical studies on cefiderocol published by January 2021 on PubMed. Also, regulatory documents, recent conference contributions, and selected data of antibiotic competitors are reviewed. We provide a comprehensive overview of the mode of action, in vitro and in vivo activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and human pharmacokinetics. Last, we discuss the efficacy and safety data from the pivotal trials.Expert opinion: Cefiderocol was in vitro potent against virtually all gram-negative pathogens and resistance was rare. The target site pharmacokinetics (i.e. urinary and lung penetration) have been well described in humans and important PK/PD targets were reached. In the clinical trials, cefiderocol was non-inferior to carbapenems in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia. Against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens, cefiderocol was similar to the best available therapy, which was mainly based on the backbone agent colistin. Overall, a substantial body of evidence supports the clinical use of cefiderocol in patients with gram-negative infections and limited treatment options.

Background: Meropenem is a second-line agent for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PD peritonitis), while information on pharmacokinetics (PK) of intraperitoneal (i.p.) meropenem is limited in this patient group. The objective of the present evaluation was to assess a pharmacokinetic rationale for the selection of meropenem doses in automated PD (APD) patients based on population PK modelling. Methods: Data were available from a PK study in six patients undergoing APD who received a single 500 mg dose of meropenem intravenous or i.p. A population PK model was developed for plasma and dialysate concentrations ( n = 360) using Monolix. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to assess the probability of achieving meropenem concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2 and 8 mg/L, representing susceptible and less susceptible pathogens respectively, for at least 40% of the dosing interval ( T >MIC ≥ 40%). Results: A two-compartment model for each plasma and dialysate concentrations with one transit compartment for the transfer from plasma to dialysate fluid described the data well. An i.p. dose of 250 and 750 mg, for an MIC of 2 and 8 mg/L respectively, was sufficient to attain the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target ( T >MIC ≥ 40%) in more than 90% patients in plasma and dialysate. Additionally, the model predicted that no relevant meropenem accumulation in plasma and/or peritoneal fluid would occur with prolonged treatment. Conclusion: Our results suggest that an i.p. dose of 750 mg daily is optimal for pathogens with an MIC 2–8 mg/L in APD patients.

Purpose To assess in healthy volunteers the whole-body distribution and dosimetry of [11C]metoclopramide, a new positron emission tomography (PET) tracer to measure P-glycoprotein activity at the blood-brain barrier. Procedures Ten healthy volunteers (five women, five men) were intravenously injected with 387 ± 49 MBq of [11C]metoclopramide after low dose CT scans and were then imaged by whole-body PET scans from head to upper thigh over approximately 70 min. Ten source organs (brain, thyroid gland, right lung, myocardium, liver, gall bladder, left kidney, red bone marrow, muscle and the contents of the urinary bladder) were manually delineated on whole-body images. Absorbed doses were calculated with QDOSE (ABX-CRO) using the integrated IDAC-Dose 2.1 module. Results The majority of the administered dose of [11C]metoclopramide was taken up into the liver followed by urinary excretion and, to a smaller extent, biliary excretion of radioactivity. The mean effective dose of [11C]metoclopramide was 1.69 ± 0.26 μSv/MBq for female subjects and 1.55 ± 0.07 μSv/MBq for male subjects. The two organs receiving the highest radiation doses were the urinary bladder (10.81 ± 0.23 μGy/MBq and 8.78 ± 0.89 μGy/MBq) and the liver (6.80 ± 0.78 μGy/MBq and 4.91 ± 0.74 μGy/MBq) for female and male subjects, respectively. Conclusions [11C]Metoclopramide showed predominantly renal excretion, and is safe and well tolerated in healthy adults. The effective dose of [11C]metoclopramide was comparable to other 11C-labeled PET tracers.

Spider silk has fascinated mankind for millennia, but it is only in recent decades that scientific research has begun to unravel all its characteristics and applications. The uniqueness of spider silk resides in its versatility, in which a combination of high strength and extensibility results in extraordinary toughness, superior to almost all natural and man-made fibers. Dragline silk consists of proteins with highly repetitive amino acid sequences, which have been correlated with specific secondary structures responsible for its physical properties. The native fiber also shows high cytocompatibility coupled with low immunogenicity, making it a promising natural biomaterial for numerous biomedical applications. Recently, novel technologies have enabled new insights into the material and biomedical properties of silk. Due to the increasing interest in spider silk, as well as the desire to produce synthetic alternatives, we present an update on the current knowledge of silk fibers produced by the spider genus Trichonephila.

Understanding vaccine-dependent effects on protective and sustained humoral immune response are crucial to plan further vaccination strategies against COVID-19. Population-based data comparing different vaccination strategies are lacking.This multicenter, population-based cohort study included 4,601 individuals ≥18 years of age after primary vaccination against COVID-19 at least four months ago (full immunization). We compared factors associated with residual antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) across different vaccination strategies (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [ChAdOx1]).Our main model including 3,787 individuals (2xBNT162b2 n = 2,271, 2xmRNA-1273 n = 251, 2xChAdOx1 n = 1,265) predicted significantly lower levels of anti-RBD-antibodies after 6 months in individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 (392.7 BAU/ml) compared to those vaccinated with BNT162b2 (1179.5 BAU/ml) or mRNA-1273 (2098.2 BAU/ml). Vaccine-dependent association of antibody levels was found for age with a significant predicted difference in BAU/ml per year for BNT162b2 (-21.5 [95%CI -24.7 to -18.3]) and no significant association for mRNA-1273 (-4.0 [95%CI -20.0 to 12.1]) or ChAdOx1 (1.7 [95%CI 0.2 to 3.1]). The predicted decrease over time since full immunization was highest in mRNA-1273 (-23.4 [95%CI -31.4 to -15.4]) compared to BNT162b2 -5.9 [95%CI -7 to -4.8]). Higher antibody levels were observed for individuals with systemic adverse events upon vaccination and current smoking (BNT162b2), for days between first and second vaccination (BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1) and for absence of comorbidities (all).Our study revealed population-based evidence of vaccine-dependent effects of age and time since full immunization on humoral immune response. Findings underline the importance of an individualized vaccine selection, especially in elderly individuals.

Research letter: Incidence of ARDS and outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a global literature survey

Development of new antibacterial agents is necessary as drug-resistant bacteria are a threat to global health. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency has been guiding this development process for more than two decades. We investigated preclinical and clinical pre-approval studies to illuminate the current authorization process with emphasis on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approaches and clinical phases. All centrally authorized systemic antibacterial and antimycobacterial drugs within the European Union were included without any time restriction. Additionally, US Food and Drug Administration-approved antibiotics of the previous 3 years, which were not yet approved by the European Medicines Agency, were included. We focused on preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies and phase II and phase III clinical trials. Furthermore, we looked at the recommended dosing regimens and approved indications. In this review, we designed tree diagrams as a new means of illustrating the development process of antibiotics to relate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase II and III studies to approved indications. We included 23 (European Medicines Agency, 18; US Food and Drug Administration, 5) antimicrobial agents. Tetracyclines, carbapenems, and cephalosporins were the leading classes. The recommended dosing intervals were significantly shorter in time- vs exposure-dependent drugs (median 8 vs 12, p = 0.006). The majority of approved indications (i.e., acute bacterial skin and soft-tissue infection, community-acquired pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infection, complicated urinary tract infection, and complicated skin and soft-tissue infection) used non-inferiority trials. Phase II and III clinical trials investigating community-acquired pneumonia involved the fewest patients. Some promising drugs were marketed in recent years; the individual steps to their authorizations are illuminated. We confirmed the relevance of preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in dosing optimization and decision making in antimicrobial drug development. Non-inferiority clinical trials predominated.

Background The broad antibacterial spectrum of piperacillin/tazobactam makes the combination suitable for the treatment of nosocomial bacterial central nervous system (CNS) infections. As limited data are available regarding piperacillin CNS exposure in patients without or with low-grade inflammation, a clinical study was conducted (1) to quantify CNS exposure of piperacillin by cerebral microdialysis and (2) to evaluate different dosing regimens in order to improve probability of target attainment (PTA) in brain. Methods Ten acute hemorrhagic stroke patients (subarachnoid hemorrhage, n = 6; intracerebral hemorrhage, n = 4) undergoing multimodality neuromonitoring received 4 g piperacillin/0.5 g tazobactam every 8 h by 30-min infusions for the management of healthcare-associated pneumonia. Cerebral microdialysis was performed as part of the clinical neuromonitoring routine, and brain interstitial fluid samples were retrospectively analyzed for piperacillin concentrations after the first and after multiple doses for at least 5 days and quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulations with various doses and types of infusions were performed to predict exposure. A T>MIC of 50% was selected as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target parameter. Results Median peak concentrations of unbound piperacillin in brain interstitial space fluid were 1.16 (range 0.08–3.59) and 2.78 (range 0.47–7.53) mg/L after the first dose and multiple doses, respectively. A one-compartment model with a transit compartment and a lag time (for the first dose) between systemic and brain exposure was appropriate to describe the brain concentrations. Bootstrap median estimates of the parameters were: transfer rate from plasma to brain (0.32 h−1), transfer rate from brain to plasma (7.31 h−1), and lag time [2.70 h (coefficient of variation 19.7%)]. The simulations suggested that PTA would exceed 90% for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) up to 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L at a dose of 12–16 and 24 g/day, respectively, regardless of type of infusion. For higher MICs, PTA dropped significantly. Conclusion Limited CNS exposure of piperacillin might be an obstacle in treating patients without general meningeal inflammation except for infections with highly susceptible pathogens. Brain exposure of piperacillin did not improve significantly with a prolongation of infusions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12028-020-00947-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

About one-sixth of the world’s population is affected by a neglected tropical disease as defined by the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control. Parasitic diseases comprise most of the neglected tropical disease list and they are causing enormous amounts of disability, morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs worldwide. The burden of disease of the top five parasitic diseases has been estimated to amount to a total 23 million disability-adjusted life-years. Despite the massive health and economic impact, most drugs currently used for the treatment of parasitic diseases have been developed decades ago and insufficient novel drugs are being developed. The current review provides a compilation of the systemic and target-site pharmacokinetics of established antiparasitic drugs. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic profile of drugs allows for the examination and possibly optimization of existing dosing schemes. Many symptoms of parasitic diseases are caused by parasites residing in different host tissues. Penetration of the antiparasitic drug into these tissues, the target site of infection, is a prerequisite for a successful treatment of the disease. Therefore, for the examination and improvement of established dosing regimens, not only the plasma but also the tissue pharmacokinetics of the drug have to be considered. For the current paper, almost 7000 scientific articles were identified and screened from which 429 were reviewed in detail and 100 were included in this paper. Systemic pharmacokinetics are available for most antiparasitic drugs but in many cases, not for all the relevant patient populations and only for single- or multiple-dose administration. Systemic pharmacokinetic data in patients with organ impairment and target-site pharmacokinetic data for relevant tissues and body fluids are mostly lacking. To improve the treatment of patients with parasitic diseases, research in these areas is urgently needed.

Purpose Voriconazole is a therapeutically challenging antifungal drug associated with high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. As a prerequisite to performing clinical trials using the minimally-invasive sampling technique microdialysis, a comprehensive in vitro microdialysis characterization of voriconazole (VRC) and its potentially toxic N-oxide metabolite (NO) was performed. Methods The feasibility of simultaneous microdialysis of VRC and NO was explored in vitro by investigating the relative recovery (RR) of both compounds in the absence and presence of the other. The dependency of RR on compound combination, concentration, microdialysis catheter and study day was evaluated and quantified by linear mixed-effects modeling. Results Median RR of VRC and NO during individual microdialysis were high (87.6% and 91.1%). During simultaneous microdialysis of VRC and NO, median RR did not change (87.9% and 91.1%). The linear mixed-effects model confirmed the absence of significant differences between RR of VRC and NO during individual and simultaneous microdialysis as well as between the two compounds (p > 0.05). No concentration dependency of RR was found (p = 0.284). The study day was the main source of variability (46.3%) while the microdialysis catheter only had a minor effect (4.33%). VRC retrodialysis proved feasible as catheter calibration for both compounds. Conclusion These in vitro microdialysis results encourage the application of microdialysis in clinical trials to assess target-site concentrations of VRC and NO. This can support the generation of a coherent understanding of VRC pharmacokinetics and its sources of variability. Ultimately, a better understanding of human VRC pharmacokinetics might contribute to the development of personalized dosing strategies.

Background and objective: Tigecycline, a broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic, is approved for use at a fixed dose irrespective of body weight. However, its pharmacokinetics may be altered in obesity, which would impact on the antibiotic's effectiveness. The objective of this study was to investigate the plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentrations of tigecycline in obese patients compared with those in a non-obese control group. Methods: Fifteen obese patients (one class II and 14 class III) undergoing bariatric surgery and 15 non-obese patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery (mainly tumour resection) received a single dose of 50 or 100 mg tigecycline as an intravenous short infusion. Tigecycline concentrations were measured up to 8 h after dosing in plasma (total concentration), in ultrafiltrate of plasma (free concentration), and in microdialysate from subcutaneous tissue, respectively. Results: In obese patients, total peak plasma concentration (1.31 ± 0.50 vs 2.27 ± 1.40 mg/L) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUC8h,plasma: 2.15 ± 0.42 vs 2.74 ± 0.73 h⋅mg/L), as normalized to a 100 mg dose, were significantly lower compared with those of non-obese patients. No significant differences were observed regarding the free plasma concentration, as determined by ultrafiltration, or the corresponding AUC8h (fAUC8h,plasma). Concentrations in interstitial fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous tissue were lower than the free plasma concentrations in both groups, and they were lower in obese compared to non-obese patients: the AUC8h in ISF (AUC8h,ISF) was 0.51 ± 0.22 h⋅mg/L in obese and 0.79 ± 0.23 h⋅mg/L in non-obese patients, resulting in a relative tissue drug exposure (AUC8h,ISF/fAUC8h,plasma) of 0.38 ± 0.19 and 0.63 ± 0.24, respectively. Conclusion: Following a single dose of tigecycline, concentrations in the ISF of subcutaneous adipose tissue are decreased in heavily obese subjects, calling for an increased loading dose. Eu clinical trials registration number: EudraCT No. 2012-004383-22.

P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) in the canalicular membrane of hepatocytes mediate the biliary excretion of drugs and drug metabolites. To measure hepatic ABCB1 and ABCG2 activity, we performed positron emission tomography (PET) scans with the ABCB1/ABCG2 substrate [11C]tariquidar in healthy volunteers and wild-type, Abcb1a/b(-/-), Abcg2(-/-), and Abcb1a/b(-/-)Abcg2(-/-) mice without and with coadministration of unlabeled tariquidar. PET data were analyzed with a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. [11C]Tariquidar underwent hepatobiliary excretion in both humans and mice, and tariquidar coadministration caused a significant reduction in the rate constant for the transfer of radioactivity from the liver into bile (by -74% in humans and by -62% in wild-type mice), suggesting inhibition of canalicular efflux transporter activity. Radio-thin-layer chromatography analysis revealed that the majority of radioactivity (>87%) in the mouse liver and bile was composed of unmetabolized [11C]tariquidar. PET data in transporter knockout mice revealed that both ABCB1 and ABCG2 mediated biliary excretion of [11C]tariquidar. In vitro experiments indicated that tariquidar is not a substrate of major hepatic basolateral uptake transporters (SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, SLCO2B1, SLC22A1, and SLC22A3). Our data suggest that [11C]tariquidar can be used to measure hepatic canalicular ABCB1/ABCG2 transport activity without a confounding effect of uptake transporters.

The pathophysiology of sepsis alters drug pharmacokinetics, resulting in inadequate drug exposure and target-site concentration. Suboptimal exposure leads to treatment failure and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, we seek to optimize antimicrobial therapy in sepsis by selecting the right drug and the correct dosage. A prerequisite for achieving this goal is characterization and understanding of the mechanisms of pharmacokinetic alterations. However, most infections take place not in blood but in different body compartments. Since tissue pharmacokinetic assessment is not feasible in daily practice, we need to tailor antibiotic treatment according to the specific patient's pathophysiological processes. The complex pathophysiology of sepsis and the ineffectiveness of current targeted therapies suggest that treatments guided by biomarkers predicting target-site concentration could provide a new therapeutic strategy. Inflammation, endothelial and coagulation activation markers, and blood flow parameters might be indicators of impaired tissue distribution. Moreover, hepatic and renal dysfunction biomarkers can predict not only drug metabolism and clearance but also drug distribution. Identification of the right biomarkers can direct drug dosing and provide timely feedback on its effectiveness. Therefore, this might decrease antibiotic resistance and the mortality of critically ill patients. This article fills the literature gap by characterizing patient biomarkers that might be used to predict unbound plasma-to-tissue drug distribution in critically ill patients. Although all biomarkers must be clinically evaluated with the ultimate goal of combining them in a clinically feasible scoring system, we support the concept that the appropriate biomarkers could be used to direct targeted antibiotic dosing. ADAMTS-13 a disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motif no. 13, ALAT alanine amino transferase, APACHE IV Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-IV, aPPT activated partial thromboplastin time, ASAT aspartate amino transferase, AT antithrombin, Ca-V-O

Voriconazole (VRC) pharmacokinetics, in particular its complex metabolism, is still not fully understood which challenges its optimal therapeutic use. To increase knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of this antifungal drug, it is essential to broaden the perspective and expand in vitro and clinical in vivo investigations in particular to aspects such as unbound plasma, target-site and metabolite concentrations. Innovative sampling approaches such as microdialysis, a minimally-invasive technique for the analysis of compound concentrations in target-site human tissue fluids, are associated with bioanalytical challenges, i.e. small sample volumes and low concentrations. Thus, a bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous quantification of VRC and its main N-oxide (NO) metabolite in human plasma, ultrafiltrate and microdialysate was developed and validated according to the European Medicines Agency guideline. Quantification was rapid, simple and feasible for clinically relevant concentrations from 5 to 5000 ng/mL in plasma and ultrafiltrate as well as from 4 to 4000 ng/mL in microdialysate. Due to the high sensitivity of the assay, only 20 µL of plasma or ultrafiltrate and 5 µL of microdialysate were required. For VRC and NO in all matrices, between-run accuracy was high with a maximum mean deviation of 7.0% from the nominal value and between-run precision was demonstrated by ≤ 11.8% coefficient of variation. Both compounds proved stable under various conditions. The assay suitability was demonstrated by the application to a clinical study quantifying simultaneously VRC and NO concentrations in plasma, ultrafiltrate and microdialysate. Additionally, the assay was successfully adapted for pharmacokinetic analyses in human tissue-derived in vitro experiments. Overall, by reducing the required sample volume, the bioanalytical method allows for an increased number of plasma samples in vulnerable populations, e.g. infants, and enables the generation of concentration-time profiles with a higher temporal resolution in microdialysis studies. Consequently, the developed assay is apt to elucidate the complex pharmacokinetics of VRC in clinical settings as prerequisite for therapy optimisation.

Background and Objective In microdose studies, drug pharmacokinetics is measured in humans after administration of subtherapeutic doses. While previous microdose studies focused primarily on plasma pharmacokinetics, we set out to evaluate the feasibility of microdosing for a pharmacokinetic assessment in subcutaneous tissue and epithelial lining fluid. Methods Healthy subjects received a single intravenous bolus injection of a microdose of [14C]ciprofloxacin (1.1 µg, 7 kBq) with (cohort A, n = 9) or without (cohort B, n = 9) a prior intravenous infusion of a therapeutic dose of unlabeled ciprofloxacin (400 mg). Microdialysis and bronchoalveolar lavage were applied for determination of subcutaneous and intrapulmonary drug concentrations. Microdose [14C]ciprofloxacin was quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry and therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results The pharmacokinetics of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin (cohort A) in plasma, subcutaneous tissue, and epithelial lining fluid was in accordance with previous data. In plasma and subcutaneous tissue, the dose-adjusted area under the concentration–time curve of microdose ciprofloxacin was similar in cohorts A and B and within an 0.8-fold to 1.1-fold range of the area under the concentration–time curve of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into subcutaneous tissue was similar in cohorts A and B and comparable to that of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin with subcutaneous tissue-to-plasma area under the concentration–time curve ratios of 0.44, 0.44, and 0.38, respectively. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into epithelial lining fluid was highly variable and failed to predict the epithelial lining fluid penetration of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. Conclusions Our study confirms the feasibility of microdosing for pharmacokinetic measurements in plasma and subcutaneous tissue. Microdosing combined with microdialysis is a potentially useful tool in clinical antimicrobial drug development, but its applicability for the assessment of pulmonary pharmacokinetics with bronchoalveolar lavage requires further studies. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03177720 (registered 6 June, 2017).

Background Preclinical data suggested anti-inflammatory properties of tedizolid. Objectives To investigate the influence of tedizolid on the cytokine response to the human endotoxin challenge and the effect of endotoxaemia on the pharmacokinetics and protein binding of tedizolid. Methods In this cross-over trial, 14 male healthy volunteers underwent two treatment periods: (A) 200 mg of tedizolid phosphate once daily for 6 days (3 days orally and 3 days intravenously), followed by an intravenous bolus of 2 ng/kg body weight of LPS on the last treatment day; and (B) intravenous bolus of LPS (2 ng/kg body weight) without concomitant tedizolid treatment. Participants underwent first period A or B, separated by at least 6 weeks. Plasma was sampled to assess cytokines and the pharmacokinetics of tedizolid. Results Following the endotoxin challenge, the peak plasma concentration (median [IQR]; 280 [155–502] versus 287 [132–541] pg/mL; P = 0.875) and AUC0–24 (979 [676–1319] versus 1000 [647–1632] pg·h/mL; P = 0.638) of interleukin-6 remained unchanged with and without concomitant tedizolid treatment. The peak concentration and AUC0–24 of TNF-α remained also unchanged with and without tedizolid (47 [31–61] versus 54 [27–69] pg/mL; P = 0.73 and 197 [163–268] versus 234 [146–280] pg·h/mL; P = 0.875, respectively). The total maximum concentration (mean ± SD; 2.94 ± 0.69 versus 2.96 ± 0.62 mg/L), total AUC0–24 (22.3 ± 3.8 versus 21.1 ± 3.6 mg·h/L) and protein binding (21.4% ± 1.7% versus 21.6% ± 1.9%) of tedizolid were similar with and without the endotoxin challenge. Conclusions Tedizolid did not attenuate the LPS-induced cytokine response in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, endotoxaemia did not influence the plasma pharmacokinetics of tedizolid.

Ceftaroline fosamil, a fifth-generation cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), is currently approved for the treatment of pneumonia and complicated skin and soft tissue infections. However, pharmacokinetics data on free lung tissue concentrations in critical patient populations are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the high-dose regimen of ceftaroline in plasma and lung tissue in cardiac surgery patients during intermittent and continuous administration. Nine patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass were included in this study and randomly assigned to intermittent or continuous administration. Eighteen hundred milligrams of ceftaroline fosamil was administered intravenously as either 600 mg over 2 h every 8 h (q8h) (intermittent group) or 600 mg over 2 h (loading dose) plus 1,200 mg over 22 h (continuous group). Interstitial lung tissue concentrations were measured by in vivo microdialysis. Relevant pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated for each group. Plasma exposure levels during intermittent and continuous administration were comparable to those of previously published studies and did not differ significantly between the two groups. In vivo microdialysis demonstrated reliable and adequate penetration of ceftaroline into lung tissue during intermittent and continuous administration. The steady-state area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h (AUCss 0-8) and the ratio of AUCSS 0-8 in lung tissue and AUC in plasma (AUClung/plasma) were descriptively higher in the continuous group. Continuous administration of ceftaroline fosamil achieved a significantly higher proportion of time for which the free drug concentration remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) during the dosing interval (% fT>4xMIC) than intermittent administration for pathogens with a MIC of 1 mg/liter. Ceftaroline showed adequate penetration into interstitial lung tissue of critically ill patients undergoing major cardiothoracic surgery, supporting its use for pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a hypercoagulable state. It has been hypothesized that higher-dose anticoagulation, including therapeutic-dose and intermediate-dose anticoagulation, is superior to prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in the treatment of COVID-19. This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of higher-dose anticoagulation compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. Ten randomized controlled open-label trials with a total of 5,753 patients were included. The risk of death and net adverse clinical events (including death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding) were similar between higher-dose and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (risk ratio (RR) 0.96, 95% CI, 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 and RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.73-1.03, P = 0.11, respectively). Higher-dose anticoagulation, compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation, decreased the risk of thromboembolic events (RR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.76, 95% CI, 1.19-2.62, P = 0.005). The risk of death showed no statistically significant difference between higher-dose anticoagulation and prophylactic-dose anticoagulation in noncritically ill patients (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.52, P = 0.62) and in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (RR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.93-1.17, P = 0.5). The risk of death was similar between therapeutic-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69-1.21, P = 0.54) and between intermediate-dose vs. prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63-1.61, P = 0.98). In patients with markedly increased d-dimer levels, higher-dose anticoagulation was also not associated with a decreased risk of death as compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.64-1.16, P = 0.34). Without any clear evidence of survival benefit, these findings do not support the routine use of therapeutic-dose or intermediate-dose anticoagulation in critically or noncritically ill patients with COVID-19.

ObjectivesSARS‐CoV‐2-induced COVID-19 has led to exponentially rising mortality, particularly in immunosuppressed patients, who inadequately respond to conventional COVID-19 vaccination.MethodsIn this blinded randomised clinical trial, we compare the efficacy and safety of an additional booster vaccination with a vector versus mRNA vaccine in non-seroconverted patients. We assigned 60 patients under rituximab treatment, who did not seroconvert after their primary mRNA vaccination with either BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna), to receive a third dose, either using the same mRNA or the vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca). Patients were stratified according to the presence of peripheral B cells. The primary efficacy endpoint was the difference in the SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rate between vector (heterologous) and mRNA (homologous) vaccinated patients by week 4. Key secondary endpoints included the overall seroconversion and cellular immune response; safety was assessed at week 1 and week 4.ResultsSeroconversion rates at week 4 were comparable between vector (6/27 patients, 22%) and mRNA (9/28, 32%) vaccines (p=0.6). Overall, 27% of patients seroconverted; specific T cell responses were observed in 20/20 (100%) vector versus 13/16 (81%) mRNA vaccinated patients. Newly induced humoral and/or cellular responses occurred in 9/11 (82%) patients. 3/37 (8%) of patients without and 12/18 (67%) of the patients with detectable peripheral B cells seroconverted. No serious adverse events, related to immunisation, were observed.ConclusionsThis enhanced humoral and/or cellular immune response supports an additional booster vaccination in non-seroconverted patients irrespective of a heterologous or homologous vaccination regimen.

Background Temocillin plasma protein binding (PPB) in healthy individuals is reported to be ∼85% but had not been studied in patients. Objectives To obtain normative data on temocillin PPB in patients in relation to infection and impact of co-medications widely used in ICU. Methods Plasma was obtained from healthy individuals (Group #1), non-ICU patients with UTI (Group #2), ICU patients with suspected/confirmed ventriculitis (Group #3) or with sepsis/septic shock (Group #4). Total and unbound temocillin concentrations were measured in spiked samples from temocillin-naive donors (in vitro) or in plasma from temocillin-treated subjects (in vivo). The impact of diluting plasma, using pharmaceutical albumin, or adding drugs potentially competing for PPB was tested in spiked samples. Data were analysed using a modified Hill–Langmuir equation taking ligand depletion into account. Results Temocillin PPB was saturable in all groups, both in vitro and in vivo. Maximal binding capacity (Bmax) was 1.2–2-fold lower in patients. At 20 and 200 mg/L (total concentrations), the unbound fraction reached 12%–29%, 23%–42% and 32%–52% in Groups #2, #3, #4. The unbound fraction was inversely correlated with albumin and C-reactive protein concentrations. Binding to albumin was 2–3-fold lower than in plasma and non-saturable. Drugs with high PPB but active at lower molar concentrations than temocillin caused minimal displacement, while fluconazole (low PPB but similar plasma concentrations to temocillin) increased up to 2-fold its unbound fraction. Conclusions Temocillin PPB is saturable, 2–4-fold lowered in infected patients in relation to disease severity (ICU admission, hypoalbuminaemia, inflammation) and only partially reproducible with albumin. Competition with other drugs must be considered for therapeutic concentrations to be meaningful.

Objective Lidocaine 5% patches are approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in adults. Little information is available on the penetration of lidocaine into skin and skin-related soft tissue, which are thought to be closer to the site where lidocaine exerts its pharmacological action on neuronal structures. This pilot study investigated subcutaneous and systemic pharmacokinetics of lidocaine during topical application of two different lidocaine 5% patches. Materials and methods This randomized two-way, two-period crossover study assessed lidocaine concentrations in subcutaneous tissue (by microdialysis) and plasma of n = 5 healthy subjects during 12-hour-long applications of a recently developed lidocaine 5% patch (Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, SA, Barcelona, Spain) and a marketed reference patch (Versatis 5% lidocaine patch, Grunenthal, Brunn am Gebirge, Austria), respectively. Results Lidocaine was detectable in subcutaneous tissue within 60 minutes from start of patch application, and in plasma only after a marked delay. The test formulation led to increased exposure to lidocaine in both subcutaneous tissue and plasma. Conclusion This study has underscored the potential of microdialysis to comparatively assess the pharmacokinetics of two different drug formulations and encourages its further use in this area.