51. Predictive Vs. Measured Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill, Obese Patients
- Author
-
Marion F. Winkler, CC Glynn, Geoffrey W. Greene, and Jorge E. Albina
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Critically ill ,business.industry ,Stress factor ,Energy requirement ,Standard deviation ,Actual weight ,Energy expenditure ,Internal medicine ,Cardiology ,Medicine ,Resting energy expenditure ,business ,Intensive care medicine ,Body mass index ,Food Science - Abstract
LEARNING OUTCOME: To examine the accuracy of predictive formulae compared to indirect calorimetry for determining energy requirements in critically ill, obese patients. Energy requirements are difficult to predict in critically ill, obese patients due to an increased resting energy expenditure compared to lean counterparts also compounded by the stressors of illness. The accuracy of predictive formulae is crucial as determination of energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry is not always possible. A retrospective review of patients receiving parenteral or enteral nutrition during 1993–1995 identified 57 obese patients [25 ventilator dependent (V), 32 spontaneous breathing (S)] with body mass index 30-50kg/m2. To evaluate the accuracy of predictive formulae compared to measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) by Deltatrac Metabolic Monitor the limits of agreement analysis was used to determine the bias (the mean difference between measured and predicted values) and the precision (the standard deviation of the bias). Predictive accuracy of formulae within ±10% MREE were also determined . The predictive formulae examined were: the Harris-Benedict equations (HBE) using actual weight, without a stress factor and with a stress factor of 1.3; HBE using the average of actual and ideal weights, without a stress factor and with a stress factor of 1.3; the Ireton-Jones equations for obesity and hospitalized patients (S,V); and the ratio of 21kcal / kg. The adjusted average weight Harris-Benedict equations were optimal for predicting MREE for the combined S and V set (bias = 182±123; 67% ±10% MREE), as well as the S subset (bias = 159±112; 69% ±10% MREE). Accurate prediction of MREE required adjustment of the average weight HBE with a stress factor of 1.3. The mean MREE was 21kcal / kg. The absolute value is recommended for use in limits of agreement analysis. Predictive formulae were least accurate for the V subset, therefore indirect calorimetry measurement is recommended for obese, ventilator dependent patients.
- Published
- 1997
- Full Text
- View/download PDF