51. Interference in speaking while hearing and vice versa
- Author
-
Marina Laganaro, Raphaël Fargier, Laboratoire Parole et Langage (LPL), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Psycholinguistique Expérimentale (FAPSE), University of Geneva [Switzerland], Swiss National Science Foundation grant no 105314_146113/1., ANR-16-CONV-0002,ILCB,ILCB: Institute of Language Communication and the Brain(2016), and Université de Genève = University of Geneva (UNIGE)
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Speech production ,Speech planning ,lcsh:Medicine ,Verbal response ,Stimulus (physiology) ,Audiology ,Electroencephalography ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Article ,Young Adult ,[SCCO]Cognitive science ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hearing ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Speech ,Attention ,Active listening ,lcsh:Science ,Evoked Potentials ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Multidisciplinary ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,[SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/Neuroscience ,lcsh:R ,030104 developmental biology ,Acoustic Stimulation ,[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology ,Female ,lcsh:Q ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Picture naming ,Utterance - Abstract
Even when speakers are not actively doing another task, they can be interfered in their speech planning by concurrent auditory stimuli. In this study, we used picture naming with passive hearing, or active listening, combined to high-density electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings to investigate the locus and origin of interference on speech production. Participants named pictures while ignoring (or paying attention to) auditory syllables presented at different intervals (+150 ms, +300 ms or +450 ms). Interference of passive hearing was observed at all positive stimulus onset asynchronies (SOA) including when distractors appeared 450 ms after picture onset. Analyses of ERPs and microstates revealed modulations appearing in a time-window close to verbal response onset likely relating to post-lexical planning processes. A shift of latency of the N1 auditory component for syllables displayed 450 ms after picture onset relative to hearing in isolation was also observed. Data from picture naming with active listening to auditory syllables also pointed to post-lexical interference. The present study suggests that, beyond the lexical stage, post-lexical processes can be interfered and that the reciprocal interference between utterance planning and hearing relies on attentional demand and possibly competing neural substrates.
- Published
- 2019