Search

Background: Tamoxifen (TAM) is generally considered the hormonal agent of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast carcinoma. The somatostatin analogues, including octreotide, have demonstrated inhibition of breast carcinoma cell lines and multiple endocrinologic actions, including reduction of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a potent mitogen for breast carcinoma cells. In an attempt to improve the efficacy of TAM, this randomized trial was performed., Methods: One hundred thirty-five eligible postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma were randomized to TAM (10 mg twice daily) alone or combined with octreotide 150 microg (administered subcutaneously thrice daily). The two groups were well balanced, except the TAM group had higher proportions of patients with visceral disease (50% vs. 37%) and a disease free interval longer than 5 years (47% vs. 34%). A cohort of 18 patients was evaluated for the impact of treatment on serum IGF-I, free IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3 levels, and total IGF binding capacity., Results: The median time to progression was estimated to be 14.2 months with TAM and 10.3 months with TAM plus octreotide. The distribution of progression free survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.26), and the progression hazard ratio (TAM/TAM + octreotide) was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.17). The distribution of survival times revealed no significant difference (P = 0.92), and the death hazard ratio was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.62-1.55). When the 106 patients with measurable or evaluable disease were considered, the objective response rate was 49% with TAM alone and 43% with TAM plus octreotide (P = 0.70). Patients who received TAM plus octreotide had higher incidences of nausea, diarrhea, and steatorrhea. The percentage of decline in serum IGF-I, from pretreatment levels to those following 3-6 weeks of treatment, was significantly greater (P < 0.01) with TAM plus octreotide than with TAM alone., Conclusions: There is no indication that the combination of TAM plus octreotide as administered in this study is substantially more efficacious than TAM alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma. The limited cohort included in IGF-I studies suggests that TAM plus octreotide produces a significantly greater reduction in serum IGF-I levels.

The authors conducted a phase II study of somatostatin analogue in 18 patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (four with previous treatment, 14 without previous treatment). Patients received 2,000 mg subcutaneously thrice daily. They were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-2 and acceptable pretreatment biochemical parameters. No patient responded to treatment. The median time to progression was 44 days. The median survival was 106 days. Toxicity related to treatment consisted of mild diarrhea and anorexia. Somatostatin analogue is not active as a single agent in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

The North Central Cancer Treatment Group designed a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Twenty-two previously untreated patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2) were enrolled on this trial from October 1993 through July 1994. Nineteen men and three women, median age 66 years (range, 44-78 years), were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes daily for 5 days at 3-week intervals until toxicity, progression of disease, or a patient decided to discontinue treatment. There were seven patients with measurable disease and 15 with evaluable disease; all were assessable for response and toxicity. A total of 113 cycles of treatment were given, for a median of three cycles (range, 1-26 cycles). Myelosuppression was the most frequent toxicity. Eighteen of 21 patients (86%) experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia during the initial treatment cycle. The median neutrophil nadir was 0.5 x 10(3)/microl (range, 0.1-1.6 x 10(3)/microl), and the median platelet nadir was 127 x 10(3)/microl (range, 18-460 x 10(3)/microl). Other toxicities more than grade 2 included malaise (two patients), and anorexia, infection, fever, pulmonary, and cardiac in one patient each. There were no objective responses, and 18 patients had stable disease for a median of 74 days. The median survival for all patients was 230 days, with 23% alive at 1 year. Topotecan as administered in this trial is reasonably well tolerated; however, the response rate was insufficient to warrant additional study in pleural mesothelioma.

Purpose: Previous investigators have reported responses in 52% of patients treated with mechlorethamine (nitrogen mustard), vincristine, and procarbazine (MOP) for recurrent glioma. To confirm these promising results, we conducted a phase II prospective study., Patients and Methods: Sixty-three patients with histologic confirmation of recurrent glioma were treated with the MOP regimen. Patients with or without prior chemotherapy received nitrogen mustard 3 mg/m2 or 6 mg/m2, respectively, intravenously on days 1 and 8 plus vincristine 2 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, and procarbazine 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1 to 14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days., Results: Of 61 patients assessable for response, eight responded (13%), with one complete response (CR). Responses were as follows: low-grade gliomas, 19%; anaplastic astrocytomas, 11%; anaplastic oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas, 25%; and glioblastomas, 4.3%. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression with leukocyte nadirs less than 1,000/microL in 23% and platelet nadirs less than 25,000/microL in 13% of patients. Two patients died of infection in the setting of neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity included neurosensory changes in 21% of patients (severe in 3%) and severe dermatologic reactions in 8%. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was the best predictor for response to chemotherapy (P=.01) and time to progression (P=.008), while PS and grade were the most important predictors of survival (P=.002 and .05, respectively)., Conclusion: This study did not confirm the high response rate previously reported in recurrent gliomas. Patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas and recurrent low-grade gliomas had the highest response rates (25% and 19%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was the best predictor of response, while PS and tumor grade were the most important predictors of survival.

Purpose: Extrahepatic metastasis represents a frequent pattern of disease progression when fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) is given by the intraarterial route for the treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Systemic fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin was added to intrahepatic FUDR to prolong the duration of disease control., Methods: Only patients with colorectal cancer who had evidence of unresectable metastases confined to the liver were eligible. Laparotomy was performed to establish arterial perfusion of the liver. Cycles of intrahepatic FUDR followed by a 1-week rest period then intravenous chemotherapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin were administered until maximal regression of hepatic metastases. Maintenance chemotherapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin was then given until disease progression., Results: Fifty-seven patients entered this trial; four patients (7%) were ineligible and 13 (23%) did not receive any chemotherapy on study because of findings at laparotomy. The 40 eligible patients who began chemotherapy are included in the statistical analyses. Twenty-five patients (62% of those who received chemotherapy) experienced regression of liver metastases. The median time to tumor progression was 9 months, but only 3% remained progression-free at 24 months. The median survival duration was 18 months. Toxicity was tolerable with no cases of biliary sclerosis. One treatment-related fatality due to sepsis was observed., Conclusion: Although short-term treatment results appear to be somewhat better than we have previously observed with intrahepatic FUDR alone, the sequential regimen did not have an impact on long-term, progression-free survival in patients with unresectable liver metastases. We are now investigating this regimen as surgical adjuvant therapy in selected patients following hepatic metastasectomy where this aggressive approach might have a greater therapeutic effect in the minimal residual disease setting.

Adoptive immunotherapy (AI) with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells is an antineoplastic modality in which immune-activated cells are administered to a host having cancer in an attempt to mediate tumor regression. Levamisole (LEV), an immune stimulant, has been suggested as having therapeutic effectiveness in a variety of cancers. After a phase I trial of recombinant IL-2 plus LEV, a phase II trial of this combination was conducted in patients who had advanced renal cell carcinoma. The regimen was IL-2 at 3 x 10(6) U/m2 daily x 5 plus LEV at 50 mg/m2 perorally three times a day x 5. Only one of the 22 eligible patients had a regression. It was a partial regression, 85 days in duration. The median time to treatment failure (refusal, progression, or off study because of toxicity) was 36 days. The only grade 4 toxicity reported was lethargy. This regimen is not recommended for further testing in patients who have advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Background: A three-arm Phase III randomized trial was performed to compare response rates, time to local or distant progression, and survival for patients with unresectable (Stage IIIA or IIIB) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma treated with standard fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (SFTRT) versus accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (AHTRT) with or without combination etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy., Methods: This trial was initiated in 1992 by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Patients with Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma were eligible. They were randomly assigned to either SFTRT (6000 centigray [cGy] in 30 fractions) or AHTRT (150 cGy twice daily to a total dose of 6000 cGy, with a 2-week break after the initial 3000 cGy); the AHTRT was given alone or with concomitant cisplatin (30 mg/m2, Days 1-3 and 28-30) and etoposide (100 mg/m2, Days 1-3 and 28-30)., Results: A total of 110 patients were entered on study. Eleven patients were declared ineligible or off study on the day of study entry. This analysis was confined to the 99 eligible patients. This article reports mature follow-up, because more than 80% of the patients have died. The median follow-up of living patients was 2.5 years. There were suggestions of improvement in the rates of freedom from local recurrence and survival for patients treated with AHTRT (with or without chemotherapy) as opposed to SFTRT (P = 0.06 and P = 0.10, respectively). The improvement in survival associated with AHTRT (with or without chemotherapy) was statistically significant for the subgroup of patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma after adjustment for other potentially confounding factors (P = 0.02). No differences in freedom from systemic progression or survival were found in a comparison of AHTRT with chemotherapy and AHTRT without chemotherapy., Conclusions: These results suggest that treatment of Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with AHTRT with or without chemotherapy may improve freedom from local progression and survival as compared with SFTRT, especially for patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The statistical powers to detect the observed differences in median time to local progression and survival were approximately 55% and 35%, respectively. Therefore, further investigation comparing SFTRT with AHTRT is warranted.

Purpose: To compare failure-free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy., Patients and Methods: Between August 1, 1987 and July 15, 1995 138 (136 eligible) premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive metastatic breast cancer were entered by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Prior chemotherapy or hormone therapy for metastatic disease was not allowed. Patients were randomly assigned to goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks; (n = 69) versus surgical ovariectomy (n = 67). The study was initially designed as an equivalence trial with 80% power to rule out a 50% improvement in survival due to ovariectomy. However, accrual was slow and the study was terminated early, which resulted in a final power of 60% for the alternative hypothesis of equal survival distributions., Results: FFS and OS were similar for goserelin and ovariectomy. The goserelin/ovariectomy death hazards ratio was .80 and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) was .53 to 1.20. The test of 50% improvement in survival due to ovariectomy was rejected at P = .006. Goserelin lowered serum estradiol to postmenopausal levels. Hot flashes (75% v 46%) and tumor flare (16% v 3%) were more common with goserelin., Conclusion: Goserelin and ovariectomy resulted in similar FFS and OS. We can rule out a moderate advantage for ovariectomy. Goserelin was safe and well tolerated.

Purpose: To evaluate the objective tumor response rate and toxicities of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11)., Patients and Methods: A total of 121 patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma--90 with prior fluorouracil (5-FU) exposure and 31 chemotherapeutically naive patients--were enrolled between May 1993 and June 1994. Patients were treated with CPT-11 at 125 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest., Results: Among 90 patients with prior 5-FU chemotherapy, 12 partial responses were observed (response rate, 13.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1% to 22.1%). Among 31 chemotherapy-naive patients, eight had partial responses (response rate, 25.8%; 95% CI, 11.9% to 44.6%). The median response duration as measured from time of initial treatment for the two groups was 7.7 months and 7.6 months, respectively. The major adverse reactions were gastrointestinal and hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was 36.4%, while the overall incidence of grade 3 or 4 leukopenia was 21.5% of patients. Only four of 121 patients (3.3%) developed neutropenic fever (grade 4 neutropenia with > or = grade 2 fever). The incidence of grade 4 leukopenia was higher in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy (chi2 test P = .04), while the incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea demonstrated no association with previous pelvic irradiation., Conclusion: According to the study design, CPT-11 showed promising activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and modest activity in patients with prior 5-FU exposure. The toxicity with this schedule appears manageable with appropriate dose modification for individual patient tolerance and an intensive loperamide regimen for the management of diarrhea. Care should be taken when treating patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy because of the increased risk of neutropenia.

Background: It is common practice to utilize a series of different hormonal agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women who, despite disease progression, continue to be candidates for hormonal therapy on a clinical basis. Letrozole is a new highly selective and potent aromatase inhibitor. There are limited data on third-line hormonal therapy in general, and this study was undertaken to evaluate letrozole in this context., Methods: A randomized trial involving two independent Phase II trials of two letrozole dosage levels, 0.5 mg and 2.5 mg per day, was performed. Eligibility requirements included failure on two prior hormonal therapies and measurable or evaluable disease., Results: Ninety-one patients, 46 receiving 0.5 mg and 45 receiving 2.5 mg of letrozole per day, were assessable for response. At the lower dose, 9 patients (20%) achieved an objective response; 6 patients (13%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. At the higher dose, 10 patients (22%) achieved a response; 8 patients (18%) had this documented on 2 occasions separated by 3 months. The median times to progression were 97 days for the lower dose and 154 days for the higher dose. Toxicity was considered acceptable., Conclusions: Letrozole has definite antitumor activity as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma at doses of 0.5 and 2.5 mg per day. It is an effective and generally well-tolerated hormonal agent.

Background: Randomized trials of colony-stimulating factors in febrile patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy have not consistently shown clinical benefit. Nevertheless, the use of colony-stimulating factors to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is widespread., Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in afebrile outpatients with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We measured the number of days of neutropenia, rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, number of days the patient received parenteral antibiotics, and number of culture-positive infections., Results: We randomly assigned 138 patients to receive G-CSF (n=71) or placebo (n=67). The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per cubic millimeter was significantly shorter for patients who received G-CSF (two days, vs. four days for the patients given placebo). However, there was no effect on the rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, duration of treatment with parenteral antibiotics, or number of culture-positive infections., Conclusions: Routine therapeutic application of G-CSF in afebrile patients with severe neutropenia can reduce the duration of neutropenia, but this does not appear to provide practical clinical benefit.

Based on reports of substantial antitumor efficacy of the combination of mitoxantrone (DHAD), 5-fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV), a clinical trial was performed to attempt augmentation of the dose of DHAD with filgrastim support. The doses and schedules, all intravenous, were DHAD (total dose divided over days 1 and 2), level I, 16 mg/m2; II, 20 mg/m2; III, 24 mg/m2; IV, 32 mg/m2; and LV, 300 mg, followed by FU, 350 mg/m2, on days 1-3. Filgrastim was given at 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously on days 4-13. The planned cycle length was 21 days. Three or 4 patients were to be entered at each dose level and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose immediately below that which resulted in 2 patients with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1. Once an apparent MTD was identified, an additional 6 patients were to be entered. Twenty patients (pts) were entered: level I: 3 pts; II: 3 pts; III: 10 pts: IV: 4 pts. The major toxicity was found to be cumulative thrombocytopenia with platelet counts < or = 20,000/microL occurring after cycle 1 at all levels beyond level I and five pts (25%) were removed from treatment solely because of platelet toxicity. Additional serious toxicities included grade 4 stomatitis in one patient (level IV) and cardiac toxicity in 2 patients with prior doxorubicin exposure. Ten pts had measurable and 8 had evaluable disease, and in 17 pts assessed, 5 (29%) achieved an objective response. The response rates in this study are lower than reported in the literature for the combination of DHAD, 5FU, LV and this may be related to the fact that only 40% of the patients were removed from protocol treatment because of disease progression. On the basis of limited DHAD-dose augmentation, toxicities observed, and modest response rate, the filgrastim-supported DHAD, 5FU, LV regimen as utilized in this study cannot be recommended for further development for treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer.

Based on evidence that suggested that systemically administered local anesthetics might be useful in chronic pain, we initiated a pilot study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of mexiletene and flecainide in the treatment of cancer pain. Twenty-one courses of either mexiletine or flecainide were administered to patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of three or better, who were suffering from cancer pain inadequately controlled with opioid analgesics. Pain control was assessed by patient questionnaires to monitor benefit and toxicity. In 17 cases, there was no suggestion of benefit. Two cases had relatively clear-cut analgesic benefit, and two others had some suggestion of mild-to-moderate analgesic relief. Flecainide was relatively well tolerated, but mexiletine appeared to cause nausea and/or vomiting in five of eight patients. This pilot trial suggests that systemically administered local anesthetics can relieve pain in a minority of patients with cancer pain.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of intensive-course fluorouracil (5FU) plus low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months following potentially curative resection of colon cancer., Patients and Methods: Three hundred seventeen patients with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned 3 to 4 weeks following surgery to receive either (1) chemotherapy with six cycles of 5FU (425 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (20 mg/m2) by rapid intravenous injection daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 to 5 weeks, or (2) observation., Results: The median follow-up duration is 72 months for patients still alive. Patients who received postoperative 5FU plus leucovorin experienced significant improvement in time to relapse (P < .01) and survival (P = .02) compared with control patients treated with surgery alone. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia were the predominant chemotherapy toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: These results indicate that intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin is effective in preventing tumor relapse and improving survival in patients with high-risk colon cancer. These benefits were seen with only six cycles of treatment, using low-dose leucovorin in combination with 5FU on a schedule convenient for outpatient administration.

Background: Previous trials in patients with colorectal carcinoma have indicated that enhancement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by leucovorin (LV) can result in an improved response rate and increased survival., Methods: Phase II trials were performed with patients who had either gastric or papcreatic adenocarcinoma with inetastases. Forty-one gastric carcinoma patients and 31 pancreatic carcinoma patients with measurable disease were treated with 5-FU, 425 mg/m2 intraveneosly (i.v.) on Days 1-5 plus LV, 20 mg/m2 i.v., on Days 1-5, reported at 4 and 8 weeks, and then every 5 weeks thereafter., Results: The patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma had a median survival of 4.8 months. There was a 22% objective response rate, including a 4.9% complete response rate and a 17.1% partial response rate. Among the 31 patients with pancreatic carcinoma, there was a median survival of 5.7 months. No patients in this group showed a response., Conclusions: The response rate for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma was modest and this regimen may provide temporary palliation for some patients. However, 5-FU and LV treatment is ineffective against metastatic pancreatic carcinoma.

We performed an open-label pilot study to define analgesic efficacy, acceptability, and toxicity of transdermal fentanyl in an ambulatory population of patients with cancer pain. Our 7-day study included 35 patients, all of whom had failed a trial of an opioid analgesic conventionally used for moderate pain. Patients received either a 25 micrograms/hr or 50 micrograms/hr fentanyl transdermal patch depending on prior opioid dose. Pain was measured daily utilizing visual analogue (VAS) and categorical (CAT) scales. Hours of nighttime sleep, quality of life, toxicities, and use of rescue medication were also assessed. There was a 24%-29% reduction in mean VAS and CAT pain scores as compared with the baseline and a 25% increase in mean hours of nighttime sleep. Fifty-nine percent of those patients responding (46% of all study patients) were satisfied to very satisfied with the analgesia provided by transdermal fentanyl. Six percent of all study patients were not at all satisfied with the pain relief obtained. Toxicities were similar to those seen with other opioids. No patient developed severe sedation or respiratory depression. The 25-50 micrograms/hr patch appears to be a safe starting dosage in ambulatory patients previously receiving opioids conventionally used for moderate pain.

Purpose: A randomized clinical trial from Great Britain suggested a possible beneficial effect of acetylsalicylate in the prevention of radiation-induced bowel toxicity. Olsalazine is an orally administered drug designed to deliver 5-aminosalicylate to the large bowel with minimal systemic absorption. A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of olsalazine in preventing acute diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy., Methods and Materials: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to olsalazine 250 mg, two capsules twice daily, or an identical appearing placebo, two capsules twice daily. Patients were then evaluated weekly during radiation therapy for the primary study endpoint, diarrhea, as well as rectal bleeding, abdominal cramping, and tenesmus., Results: The study was closed early, after entry of 58 evaluable patients, when a preliminary analysis showed excessive diarrhea in patients randomized to olsalazine. The incidence and severity of diarrhea were worse in patients randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.0036). Sixty percent of the patients randomized to olsalazine experienced Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea compared to only 14% randomized to placebo. There was also a trend toward higher incidence and greater severity of abdominal cramping in patients who were randomized to olsalazine (p = 0.084)., Conclusion: Administration of olsalazine during pelvic radiation therapy resulted in an increased incidence and severity of diarrhea. Olsalazine is contraindicated in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy.

Mitomycin is a chemotherapeutic agent that is used to treat a variety of solid tumors. Pulmonary toxic reactions from this agent can be life threatening. We prospectively investigated the utility of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in monitoring for the occurrence of pulmonary toxicity due to mitomycin. PFTs were obtained at baseline and after three cycles of mitomycin therapy. We analyzed the clinical course, radiologic studies, and PFT results in 133 patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lung randomized to treatment with either mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin or mitomycin alone as part of a prospective treatment protocol of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG). The diffusing capacity (DCO) was available in only 40 patients after the third cycle due to a high rate of progression and death from their underlying disease. After three cycles of chemotherapy, there was an average decline in the DCO of 14% (p<0.0001) and no changes were observed in expiratory flows. No differences were noted between treatment arms. A significant decline in the DCO (defined as a >20% change after correcting for hemoglobin) was noted in 11 of 40 patients (28%). This decline in the DCO was not associated with a worse prognosis (p=0.77). Seven patients (5%) developed severe pulmonary toxic reactions attributed to chemotherapy, including noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, interstitial pneumonitis, and pleural effusions. Corticosteroid therapy resulted in temporary subjective improvement in three patients. The Dco did not correlate with the development of pulmonary toxic reactions in these seven patients. In conclusion, (1) the incidence of clinically significant pulmonary toxic reactions from mitomycin is relatively low (5%), (2) mitomycin therapy resulted in a greater than 20% decline in the DCO in approximately one-fourth of patients receiving three cycles of chemotherapy, and (3) the use of serial PFTs in patients receiving mitomycin was not shown to be predictive of pulmonary toxicity.

Background: Information regarding prognostic factors and survival in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen is limited., Methods: The data from 4 prospective clinical trials were analyzed, including information on 396 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. Emphasis was placed on 184 elderly patients (age greater than 65 years) to characterize the response to therapy, time to progression TTP), overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and treatment-related toxicity., Results: Among 363 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, the objective response rates were higher in the elderly patients (46% versus 33%, P = 0.06); but age did not achieve significance in a logistic regression analysis (P= 0. 1). The median TTP (10.5 months versus 6.2 months, log rank P = 0.002) and OS (35.7 months versus 28.8 months, log rank P = 0.02) were superior in the elderly cohort. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis approached statistical significance (P = 0.055) for TTP but was not significant for OS (P = 0.17). Among elderly patients, disease free interval (DFI) (greater than 5 years), dominant disease site (soft tissue), prior adjuvant chemotherapy, positive estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) and performance status (PS) were independent prognostic factors. Hot flashes were common in both younger and older cohorts (25% versus 33%, P = 0.14), while anorexia (14% versus 22%, P = 0.04) and mood changes (2% versus 6%, P = 0.03) were more common in the elderly patients., Conclusions: There was no indication that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have a poorer outcome with regard to response rate, TTP or OS; in fact, they appeared to have a slightly better prognosis although this was not significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors. In elderly patients, DFI, PS, positive ER or PGR, and dominant disease site are independent prognostic factors.

Purpose: Megestrol acetate has been reported to improve appetite and quality of life and to decrease nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was formulated to evaluate the impact of megestrol acetate on quality of life, toxicity, response, and survival in individuals with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer who received concomitant chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive megestrol acetate 800 mg/d orally or placebo. In addition, all patients were scheduled to receive a maximum of four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Quality of life was self-assessed at entry onto study, with every cycle of chemotherapy, and 4 months thereafter with a linear visual analog scale. Toxicity was evaluated by patient questionnaire and investigator reports., Results: A total of 243 eligible patients were randomized. Those who received megestrol acetate had increased nonfluid weight gain (P = .004) and significantly less nausea (P = .0002) and vomiting (P = .02). Significant thromboembolic phenomena occurred more often in patients who received megestrol acetate versus placebo (9% v 2%, P = .01). Patients who received megestrol acetate had more edema (30% v 20%, P = .002), an inferior response rate to chemotherapy (68% v 80%, P = .03), and a trend for inferior survival duration (median, 8.2 v 10.0 months, P = .49). These findings may have been influenced by a poorer quality of life of the megestrol acetate group at study initiation. There were no significant changes in quality of life scores over time between either of the study arms., Conclusion: Megestrol acetate cannot be routinely recommended for all patients with small-cell lung cancer at the time of chemotherapy initiation. Rather, its therapeutic ratio may be more favorable for patients with problematic cancer anorexia/cachexia.

Ifosfamide is an oxazaphosphorine analogue of cyclophosphamide with proven activity in breast cancer but substantial urotoxicity. The introduction of mesna as a uroprotective agent provided a stimulus for reexamination of ifosfamide for therapy of women with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty women with measurable (18 patients) or evaluable (2 patients) disease were entered into a phase II clinical trial of ifosfamide plus mesna as first-line chemotherapy. Ifosfamide was administered i.v. at a dose of 1,800 mg/m2 in 1 L D5W over 2 h on five consecutive days. Mesna was administered i.v. at a dose of 400 mg/m2 over 15 min immediately before and 1 h after ifosfamide, and then every 4 h for three more doses. The last three doses could be given either i.v. or orally. The planned cycle length was 28 days. Three patients (15%), all with measurable disease, achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval: 3 to 38%). Median time to progression was 137 days and median survival was 407 days. Toxicities included cumulative myelosuppression and substantial nausea and emesis. Four patients were removed from treatment because of toxicity alone and a fifth refused further therapy. We conclude that ifosfamide, plus mesna, as given in this protocol has definite but limited antitumor activity and poor tolerability.

Purpose: Based on evidence that suggests pentoxifylline can inhibit tumor necrosis factor, we set out to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this drug in patients with cancer-associated anorexia and/or cachexia., Patients and Methods: Seventy patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2 with cancer anorexia and/or cachexia (defined by a weight loss of > or = 5 lb in the preceding 2 months or a caloric intake < 20 kcal/kg/d) were stratified and then randomly assigned to receive pentoxifylline or identical-appearing placebo tablets in a double-blind fashion. Patients' weights were monitored and patient questionnaires were used to assess appetite, toxicity, and perception of benefit., Results: Pentoxifylline failed to improve the appetites of study patients. Pentoxifylline did not appear to cause any toxicity., Conclusion: This study failed to demonstrate any benefit of pentoxifylline at this dose and schedule as therapy for cancer anorexia and/or cachexia.

Purpose: To perform a randomized three-arm comparison of tamoxifen (TAM; 20 mg/d) and two separate doses of toremifene (TOR; 60 mg/d [TOR60] and 200 mg/d [TOR200]) in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer., Materials and Methods: Six hundred forty-eight patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive TAM (n = 215), TOR60 (n = 221), or TOR200 (n = 212)., Results: The combined response rates (by intent to treat) were as follows;: TAM, 44%; TOR60, 50%; and TOR200, 48%. Complete and partial response rates were as follows: TAM, 19%; TOR60, 21%, and TOR200, 23% (not statistically different). Median times to progression and overall survival were not significantly different. Adverse events (lethal, serious but nonlethal, and important but non-life-threatening) were similar in all three arms, except that patients in the TOR200 arm had a statistically significantly increased rate of nausea (37% v 26% and 26% for TOR200, TAM, and TOR60, respectively; P = .027). Quality-of-life assessments were not different among the three arms., Conclusion: The activity, toxicity, and side effects of TOR in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer are similar if not equivalent to those of TAM. We detected no clear evidence of a dose-response effect for TOR. TOR60 is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer and can be considered an alternative to TAM as first-line treatment for such patients.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine by randomized, controlled, double-blind evaluation whether therapy with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, would delay tumor progression and improve survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas who were ambulatory with no significant symptoms., Methods: Two hundred sixty patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and without symptoms related to colon cancer were randomized to receive 150 micrograms of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily or, initially, no treatment. After 91 patients were entered in the double-blind study, saline placebo injections were used for patients in the control arm., Results: The randomization culminated in balanced assignment of patients with respect to disease site(s), presence or absence of measurable or evaluable disease, and interval from diagnosis of metastasis to protocol entry. Steatorrhea and diarrhea, usually mildly severe, resulted more often from treatment than from the placebo. The major end points were time to progression and survival. Curves for both parameters overlapped in the blind and open trial segments., Conclusion: Octreotide at a dose of 150 micrograms given three times daily is not effective therapy for patients with advanced asymptomatic colon carcinoma.

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) to prevent tumor relapse following potentially curative surgery in patients with high-risk colon cancer. A secondary goal was to determine the effect of IFN-gamma on immune function and to correlate alterations in immune parameters with survival., Patients and Methods: Three to 4 weeks after undergoing resection of all known malignant disease, 99 patients with stage II, III, or IV colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive IFN-gamma 0.2 mg total dose by subcutaneous injection daily for 6 months or observation. Serial assessment of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression and Fc receptors on peripheral-blood monocytes was conducted in 24 patients who received IFN-gamma and 27 control patients., Results: With a median follow-up duration of 59 months in patients still alive, there was evidence of a detrimental effect on time to relapse (P = .03) among patients who received IFN-gamma. There was no significant difference in patient survival (P = .12). This study has sufficient power to rule out a 25% reduction in death rate for patients who received IFN-gamma (P < .05). Significant enhancement of immune function was observed in patients treated with IFN-gamma as measured by HLA-DR expression (P < .01) and Fc receptors (P < .001) on peripheral-blood monocytes., Conclusion: This study effectively rules out any clinically meaningful benefit for IFN-gamma as surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer. Although significant enhancement of nonspecific immune function was seen with this dosage administration schedule of IFN-gamma, this was not associated with any demonstrable antitumor effect.

Purpose: Malignant cells from non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) have been shown to express the somatostatin receptor on their cell surface and most NHL are visible on somatostatin radioscintigraphy scans. This provided the rationale to conduct a phase II trial of a somatostatin analog in patients with B- and T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders., Patients and Methods: Sixty-one patients with measurable or assessable lymphoproliferative disorders (31 stage III or IV low-grade NHL; 21 chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL]; and nine cutaneous T-cell NHL [CTCL]) were enrolled. Patients were treated with somatostatin 150 micrograms subcutaneously (SQ) every 8 hours for 1 month. Patients with stable or responding disease received 2 additional months of therapy; those who responded after 3 months were treated for an additional > or = 3 months., Results: Sixty patients were assessable for toxicity and 56 for response. There were no complete remissions. In the low-grade NHL group, 36% (10 of 28 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 56%) had a partial remission. Forty-four percent (four of nine; 95% CI, 14% to 79%) of patients with CTCL had a partial response. No patients with CLL had a partial remission. Among 45 patients with stable disease or a partial remission, the mean time to progression (TTP) was 10.9 months (median, 6.2; range, 1.6 to 48.5). The drug was well tolerated, with the most common side effects being diarrhea and hyperglycemia., Conclusion: Somatostatin at a dose of 150 micrograms every 8 hours is well tolerated and has activity in low-grade NHL.

A phase II combination chemotherapy protocol combining methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin was designed to evaluate tumor response and survival in patients with advanced/recurrent cervix and vaginal cancer. Twenty-nine patients with advanced/recurrent cervix cancer and three patients with advanced vaginal cancer who had not previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy were assigned to chemotherapy treatment at 4-week intervals with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v., Day 1, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 i.v., Days 2, 15, and 22, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v., Day 2, and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v., Day 2. After a median of 4 cycles (maximum number 2 cycles beyond complete regression; 6 cycles with stable regression); we observed objective regressions in all 3 patients with vaginal cancer and 19 patients (66%, 95% CI = 46.82) with cervix cancer including complete regression in 6 patients (21%, 95% CI = 8.40) and partial regression in 13 patients (45%, 95% CI = 26.64). Median overall survival was 11.5 months (range 1.1-54+). Median survival of responders was 12.8 months (range 3.6-54+). Toxicity included neutropenia, alopecia, nausea, emesis, and stomatitis. Although grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in over half of the patients, there were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, MVAC is a highly active outpatient chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced/recurrent cervix cancer, achieving a high complete and partial response rate with moderate hematologic toxicity. These results need to be confirmed by phase III trial in advanced disease patients and MVAC may be a suitable regimen for investigation in neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials in poor prognosis, previously untreated patients.

The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) plus recombinant interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with recurrent glioma. As single agents, both BCNU and IFN-alpha can cause tumor regression in patients with recurrent glioma. In vitro studies suggest synergy between the two agents. Thirty-five patients in whom computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) evidence was obtained of progressive astrocytoma, oligoastrocytoma, or oligodendroglioma received recombinant IFN-alpha 2a (12 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly) on Days 1 through 3 and BCNU (150 mg/m2 intravenously) on Day 3 of each 6-week cycle. All patients had tumor progression despite radiation therapy and had received no prior chemotherapy. Response was assessed by CT or MR evidence and by neurological examination while the patients were on a regimen of stable or decreasing doses of corticosteroids. All patients could be evaluated for response and toxicity. Twenty-nine percent of the patients demonstrated objective tumor regression; 37% remained stable for more than 6 months and 25% were stable for less than 6 months. The median duration of response to IFN-alpha and BCNU was 9.9 months and the median survival for all patients was 13.3 months. Toxicity consisted primarily of moderate myelosuppression, venous irritation, vomiting, flulike symptoms, and transient reversible exacerbation of underlying neurological symptoms. The use of BCNU plus IFN-alpha is a safe, active regimen in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioma who have failed to respond to prior radiation therapy. The contribution of IFN to the antitumor activity observed in this study compared with that previously described with BCNU alone cannot be assessed from this trial.

Sedation may be a dose-limiting side-effect of opioid therapy in some cancer patients. This study was designed to evaluate further the use of the psychostimulant, methylphenidate, an agent that has been reported to counter-act opioid-induced sedation, in patients with cancer-related pain. Patients receiving a stable dose of an opioid for cancer-related pain were recruited for this randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial. In addition to their regular dose of narcotics, they received 5 days of methylphenidate followed by 5 days of placebo, or vice versa. Our data did not definitively demonstrate any statistically significant benefit for methylphenidate, but did suggest that this drug could mildly decrease narcotic-induced drowsiness and could increase night-time sleep. These data, in conjunction with other published data, suggest that methylphenidate can counteract narcotic-induced daytime sedation to a limited degree.

Purpose: Gamma interferon has a wide range of properties, including the ability to sensitize solid tumor cells to the effects of ionizing radiation. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group has previously completed pilot studies of accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (AHTRT) in patients with unresectable Stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This Phase I study was designed to assess the toxicity of concomitant gamma interferon and AHTRT in a similar patient population., Methods and Materials: Between December 1991 and May 1992, 18 patients with unresectable Stage IIIA/B NSCLC were treated with daily gamma interferon (0.2 mg subcutaneously) concomitant with AHTRT (60 Gy given in 1.5 Gy twice daily fractions). All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 with weight loss < 5%. Eight patients had Stage IIIA and 10 had Stage IIIB disease., Results: Nine patients (50%) experienced severe, life-threatening, or fatal toxicities. Eight of the patients (44%) developed significant radiation pneumonitis, which was severe in six patients and fatal in two patients (11% treatment-related mortality). Two patients (11%) developed severe radiation esophagitis. With follow-up of 15-21 months, 2 patients are alive, and 16 have died. The median survival time and 1-year survival rate is 7.8 months and 38%, respectively., Conclusion: Gamma interferon appeared to sensitize normal lung tissue to the effects of radiation, as demonstrated by the high incidence of severe or fatal radiation pneumonitis. We do not recommend pursuing gamma interferon as a radiosensitizer in this setting.

Purpose: We evaluated the effect of recombinant interferon gamma (rIFN-gamma) on survival and toxicity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in complete remission (CR)., Patients and Methods: One hundred patients in CR following treatment with six cycles of combination chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were studied. All patients had been enrolled onto a cooperative group trial (North Central Cancer Treatment Group [NCCTG] 86-20-51). Patients received observation only or rIFN-gamma at a dose of 4 x 10(6) U subcutaneously per day for 6 months., Results: Six patients (12%) did not comply with rIFN-gamma treatment. Substantial nonhematologic toxicities consisting of chills, myalgia, lethargy, and alteration of mood-personality were observed. No patient experienced life-threatening or fatal toxicity. The median times to progression for rIFN-gamma treatment or observation were 6.9 and 8.1 months (P = .54). The median survival times were 13.3 and 18.8 months, respectively (P = .43). Approximately 70% of all patients relapsed within 2 years., Conclusion: Time to progression and survival were inferior in patients treated with rIFN-gamma compared with randomized control subjects, although this difference was not statistically significant. These data indicate that rIFN-gamma treatment is not associated with a 33% improvement in survival (P = .04). Because of the high rate of relapse, SCLC patients in CR are an ideal group in which to evaluate novel and minimally toxic agents.

Background: Doxorubicin generally is considered to be the most effective single chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of breast cancer. The major cumulative dose-limiting toxicity is cardiac toxicity, which may be related to the formation of free radicals with subsequent lipid peroxidation, leading to membrane damage. The anthrapyrazoles, of which piroxantrone is a member, were synthesized in an attempt to eliminate this toxicity., Methods: A Phase II clinical trial was conducted in 30 women with metastatic breast cancer in whom piroxantrone was administered at a dose of 160 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion. The planned cycle length for retreatment was 3 weeks. Measurable metastatic disease and failure on one prior chemotherapy regimen, but no prior anthracycline exposure, were required for response evaluation., Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response, and 6 (21% and 95% confidence intervals: 10-43%) achieved an objective response (1 complete, 5 partial responses), with a median response duration of 244 days. The median time-to-disease progression for all patients was 124 days. Eight patients received cumulative doses of piroxantrone approaching or exceeding 1000 mg/m2, and all had reductions in the resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The estimated median decrease in LVEF at 1000 mg/m2 was 16%, with a range of 10-28%. Clinical findings of congestive heart failure developed in two patients., Conclusions: Piroxantrone had definite antitumor activity in women who had metastatic breast cancer and failure on prior chemotherapy that did not include an anthracycline. The 95% confidence interval for response probability was broad, but the level of activity observed was relatively low. The clear association with cardiac toxicity combined with the relatively low efficacy led to the conclusion that piroxantrone cannot be recommended for further development as therapy for women with breast cancer. Further study of other anthrapyrazoles is necessary to determine if the promise of this new class of agents can be fulfilled.

Purpose: Hydrazine sulfate, an agent that appears to inhibit gluconeogenesis, has been studied in cancer patients for approximately 20 years. There was a recent resurgence of interest in this drug when subset analysis of a small placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial reported improved survival among non-small-cell lung cancer patients with a good performance status who were randomized to receive this drug along with standard chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients on this trial had newly diagnosed, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer and were treated with cisplatin and etoposide. In addition, they were randomized to receive hydrazine sulfate or placebo in a double-blind manner., Results: A total of 243 patients were randomized. Response rates were similar in the two treatment arms. There were trends for worse time to progression and survival in the hydrazine sulfate arm. No significant differences were noted in the two study arms with regard to toxicity or quality of life (QL)., Conclusion: This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit for patients who received hydrazine sulfate.

Background: The fraction of breast cancer cells undergoing DNA synthesis at any one time is relatively low, which is problematic because most chemotherapeutic agents are most effective against dividing cells. Estrogens administered in vitro and in vivo can increase breast cancer cell proliferation. A randomized clinical trial was performed to determine if estrogenic recruitment could increase the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy., Methods: One hundred sixty-five women were randomized, with two excluded from these analyses, to either an intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) regimen alone (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2) or CMF preceded by 3 days of diethylstilbestrol (DES) at a dose of 1 mg orally per day. The planned cycle length was 3 weeks., Results: Objective responses were seen in 20 of 80 patients (25%) treated with CMF and 32 of 83 patients (39%) treated with DES-CMF, and this difference almost achieved statistical significance (chi-square, two-sided P = 0.06). However, duration of response, time to disease progression, and survival time were similar for the two regimens., Conclusions: Estrogenic recruitment with DES as used in this study does not substantially increase the efficacy of a CMF regimen administered intravenously every 3 weeks.

Background: Long-term survival with extensive stage small cell lung cancer is rare. There have been no major advances in the treatment of this stage of disease in the last 15-20 years. New agents with activity against this malignancy are needed. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of edatrexate against small cell lung cancer in a Phase II trial., Methods: This was a multicenter cooperative oncology group trial. Patients were either previously untreated or had failed only one prior chemotherapy regimen. All previously untreated patients had extensive stage disease. Patients in whom prior therapy had been unsuccessful had either limited or extensive stage disease. All cases had histologic documentation. Patients received edatrexate (80 mg/m2) intravenously over 20-30 minutes every 7 days. Previously untreated patients with disease progression at any time or stable disease after 6 weeks of treatment were crossed over to treatment with cisplatin and etoposide. The primary end points of the study were clinical response and toxicity to edatrexate. All patients were observed for survival., Results: Eleven previously untreated and 22 previously treated patients were enrolled. A median of five doses of chemotherapy was given to each group. No major clinical response was observed in either group. The median survival time for the 11 previously untreated patients was 9.8 months versus 3.7 months for individuals who had received prior therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were the primary toxicities, and both were infrequent., Conclusions: Edatrexate is inactive against small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and methyl lomustine (CCNU) (FAMe), 5-FU, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (FAP), and FAMe alternating with triazinate (TZT) when compared with a standard therapy of 5-FU alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Two hundred fifty-two eligible patients selected for study had proven locally unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. The majority had nonmeasureable disease. They were randomly assigned to receive one of the three drug combination regimens or to 5-FU alone administered by rapid injection in 5-day course. Survival was the primary study end point., Results: None of the three drug combinations showed a significant advantage over 5-FU alone in improved performance score, weight gain, or patient survival. Each of the three combinations was more toxic than 5-FU alone., Conclusion: FAMe, FAP, or FAMe alternating with TZT cannot be recommended for the therapy of advanced gastric carcinoma. Therapy of this disease should remain an experimental endeavor. It would seem reasonable to prove the value of any new treatment approach by a randomized comparison to simple therapy with 5-FU alone.

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of transdermal clonidine for alleviating tamoxifen-induced hot flashes in women with a history of breast cancer., Patients and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, crossover design was used in this prospective study. Women with a history of breast cancer who were receiving tamoxifen and suffering from hot flashes were potentially eligible for this protocol study., Results: Clonidine did reduce hot-flash frequency to a degree that was statistically impressive (P < .0001), but clinically moderate (20% reduction from baseline). It also decreased hot-flash severity (P = .02, 10% reduction from baseline). Clonidine was related to increased mouth dryness (P < .001), constipation (P < .02), itchiness under the patch (P < .01), and drowsiness (P < .05)., Conclusion: Better means are needed to alleviate hot flashes among patients in whom estrogen therapy is contraindicated.

Purpose: To compare two commonly used schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. Each of these dosage administration schedules has been demonstrated to be superior to single-agent bolus 5FU in previous controlled trials., Patients and Methods: Three hundred seventy-two ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were stratified according to performance status, and presence and location of any measurable indicator lesion(s). They were then randomized to receive chemotherapy with one of the following regimens: (1) intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin (5FU 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] push daily for 5 days with courses repeated at 4- to 5-week intervals); (2) weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin (5FU 600 mg/m2 IV push plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion weekly for 6 weeks with courses repeated every 8 weeks)., Results: Three hundred sixty-two of 372 patients randomized (97.3%) were eligible and included in the analysis. Three hundred forty-six patients (95.6%) have died. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between the two 5FU/leucovorin regimens tested with respect to the following parameters: objective tumor response (35% v 31%), survival (median, 9.3 v 10.7 months), and palliative effects (as assessed by relief of symptoms, improved performance status, and weight gain). There were significant (P < .05) differences in toxicity, with more leukopenia and stomatitis seen with the intensive-course regimen, and more diarrhea and requirement for hospitalization to manage toxicity with the weekly regimen. Financial cost was also higher with the weekly regimen., Conclusion: Intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin appears to have a superior therapeutic index compared with weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin using the dosage administration schedules applied in this study based on similar therapeutic effectiveness, but lower financial cost, and less need for hospitalization to manage chemotherapy toxicity.

Purpose: To develop a tolerable regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin, and radiation, and to obtain an early estimate of therapeutic effectiveness., Patients and Methods: Forty patients with locally unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal carcinoma were studied (pancreas, n = 22; rectum and sigmoid, n = 10; gastric, n = 6; other, n = 2). Irradiation therapy was administered in 1.8-Gy fractions 5 days per week, with total doses ranging from 45 to 54 Gy. 5-FU 400 mg/m2/d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d, both by rapid intravenous injection, were administered for 3 or 4 days during the first and fifth weeks of radiation. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/d plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2/d were administered for 4 days at 4 weeks following radiation and for 5 days at 9 weeks., Results: Major toxicities with upper abdominal treatment were nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and leukopenia. A tolerable dosage regimen was radiation at 45 Gy with 4 days of 5-FU plus leucovorin during the first week and 3 days during the last week with postradiation chemotherapy. Major toxicities with pelvic radiation were diarrhea and leukopenia. A tolerable regimen was 54 Gy with 4 days of 5-FU plus leucovorin during the first and fifth week followed by the postradiation chemotherapy. Median survival durations for pancreatic and rectal/sigmoid carcinomas are 13 months and 31 months, respectively. Five patients have no evidence of disease from 38 to 50 months after the onset of therapy (rectal, n = 2; stomach, n = 2; pancreas, n = 1)., Conclusion: We have developed patient-tolerable regimens for combined 5-FU plus leucovorin followed by radiation to the abdomen and to the pelvis. The favorable results observed in locally unresectable disease allow cautious optimism for possible effectiveness in the surgical adjuvant setting, a possibility currently being tested in national trials of rectal and gastric carcinoma.

Purpose: The combination of etoposide (E) and cisplatin (P) is an accepted standard therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, the optimal sequencing and administration schedule has not been defined. This study was designed to evaluate different sequencing and administration schedules of E and P in the treatment of SCLC., Patients and Methods: Five hundred fifty-two eligible patients with limited-(LD) and extensive-stage (ED) SCLC were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: arm A, P 30 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus followed by E 130 mg/m2 bolus; arm B, E 130 mg/m2 bolus followed by P 30 mg/m2 bolus; arm C, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 30 mg/m2 bolus at the end of each 24-hour infusion of E; arm D, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 45 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2 and 3 only. Two 3-day induction cycles of IV EP were administered 4 weeks apart. Subsequent therapy was the same for all arms, consisting of four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) at 4-week intervals. Consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were administered to responders., Results: The overall response rate (84%) was similar in all treatment arms. Treatment arm A was associated with the best complete response (CR) rate (52%), the most favorable median survival time (MST) of 15 months, and a 26% 2-year survival rate. Patients with LD on arm A had a MST of 20 months and a 42% 2-year survival rate. Multivariate analysis indicated that extent of disease, performance status, arm of therapy, and sex were significant independent factors influencing survival. Toxicity of the four regimens was similar, except for greater thrombocytopenia on arm D., Conclusion: The bolus administration of EP with E following P for the first two cycles of chemotherapy was the most effective regimen, with especially encouraging survival for LD patients.

Background: The primary goal of this study was to determine the incidence of severe or greater acute radiation toxicity, and secondarily, response, survival, and local control in patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or B non-small cell lung cancer treated with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation therapy (AHTRT)., Methods: From September, 1989 through March, 1990, 21 evaluable patients with unresectable Stage IIIA or B non-small cell lung cancer were treated with AHTRT, using 6000 cGy in 40 fractions of 150 cGy twice daily, 6 hours between fractions, with a 2-week break midway through treatment., Results: Two patients (9.5%) had acute Grade 3 radiation esophagitis requiring intravenous hydration, and two patients (9.5%) had acute Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis requiring oxygen and steroids. Only one patient had chronic toxicity, a Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Five patients (24%) achieved a complete response, whereas eight (38%) had a partial response or regression. With minimum follow-up of nearly 3 years, 3 patients are alive and 18 are dead. The median survival time and 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 10.8 months, 48%, 29%, and 14%, respectively. Local control was achieved in 11 of 21 (52%) patients., Conclusions: This AHTRT regimen can be given with an acceptable incidence of acute radiation toxicity. Response, survival, and local control rates in this unfavorable group of patients are encouraging. A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III study of standard thoracic radiation therapy (6000 cGy in 30 fractions of 200 cGy daily) versus AHTRT (+/- chemotherapy) is now open.

Background: In an effort to identify new active chemotherapeutic agents against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the authors conducted a randomized Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of amonafide or trimetrexate in patients with Stage IV disease., Methods: This was a multicenter Cooperative Oncology Group trial. All patients had advanced NSCLC and were previously untreated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to treatment after enrollment. Amonafide was administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion (1600 mg/m2) every 21 days. Trimetrexate (150 mg/m2) was administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 2 weeks. The primary endpoints of the study were clinical response and toxic effects. All patients were observed for survival., Results: Thirty-five patients received amonafide and were assessable. There were no complete responses and two partial responses (6%). Thirty-seven patients were treated with trimetrexate. There were no complete responses and five (14%) partial responses. Myelosuppression was the primary toxic effect observed with amonafide treatment. Trimetrexate was associated infrequently with clinically significant side effects., Conclusions: Amonafide is inactive against NSCLC, and no additional studies with this agent are planned. Trimetrexate has some activity against NSCLC, but its role in the future therapy of this disease is questionable.

Purpose: Several placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that megestrol acetate can result in appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was designed to compare megestrol acetate doses ranging from 160 to 1,280 mg/d., Methods: This trial randomized 342 assessable patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia to receive oral megestrol acetate at doses of 160, 480, 800, or 1,280 mg/d. Patients were evaluated monthly by history, examination, patient-completed questionnaires, and serum albumin levels., Results: The data demonstrate that there is a positive dose-response effect for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation (P < or = .02). In concert, there was a trend for more nonfluid weight gain with higher drug doses. Megestrol acetate was well tolerated in this group of patients with advanced malignant disease., Conclusion: The positive dose-response effect that we observed for megestrol acetate on appetite stimulation supports both our prestudy hypothesis and other available literature. Nonetheless, based primarily on the cost and inconvenience associated with the use of higher doses of this drug, it is reasonable to use 160 mg/d for the initial treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia in routine clinical practice.

Objectives: To define the validity of fecal blood as a marker for colorectal neoplasia in the screening setting and to compare yields by Hemoccult and HemoQuant fecal occult blood screening tests., Design: A multicenter masked comparison of fecal blood test results against structural colorectal evaluations and longitudinal follow-up, serving as criterion standards, in nonreferred subjects at risk for colorectal neoplasia., Setting: Communities, primary care centers, referral centers., Participants: Two groups: (1) 1217 patients aged at least 18 years undergoing routine structural surveillance evaluations following curative resection of a colorectal tumor and (2) 12312 relatives of colorectal cancer patients aged at least 50 years., Interventions: Blinded Hemoccult II and HemoQuant testing on three mailed-in stool samples per subject., Main Outcome Measure: Sensitivity of fecal blood tests for colorectal neoplasia., Results: In the postresection group, surveillance evaluations revealed 46 malignant colorectal neoplasms and 402 polyps. At matched specificity, sensitivity of either test for cancer was 26% (95% confidence interval, 13% to 39%). Hemoccult was positive in 21% of intraluminal recurrences, 33% of all new primary tumors, and 29% of Dukes A or B cancers; HemoQuant was elevated in 24%, 28%, and 29%, respectively. Sensitivity for polyps 1.0 cm or larger was 13% by Hemoccult and 11% by HemoQuant. In the group of relatives, estimated sensitivity for cancer at 1 to 3 years of follow-up was 25% to 33% by Hemoccult, not significantly different from the 29% to 43% by HemoQuant., Conclusions: Based on our observations in the screening setting, fecal blood appears to be a poor marker for colorectal neoplasia. Most cancers and the vast majority of polyps will be missed. Hemoccult and HemoQuant are similarly insensitive.

Background: In an effort to confirm the efficacy of mitomycin C against metastatic squamous cell lung carcinoma and to compare the efficacy of single-agent therapy with a combination containing cisplatin, the authors conducted a randomized Phase III trial of mitomycin C alone versus mitomycin C, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP)., Methods: All patients had advanced squamous cell lung carcinoma, and survival was the primary end point. There were 133 eligible patients who received either mitomycin C alone (n = 64) or MVP (n = 69). The two groups were similar with respect to performance score, disease status, age, sex, and stage., Results: The major objective response rates were 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-41%) and 43% (95% CI, 32-55%) for mitomycin C alone and MVP, respectively (P = 0.1). The median time to progression was 83 days for mitomycin C alone, compared with 119 days for MVP (P = 0.026). The median survival time was 114 days for mitomycin C and 163 days for MVP (P = 0.09). The 1-year survival rates were equivalent. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, and there were significantly greater leukocyte nadirs with MVP therapy (P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Mitomycin C has antitumor activity against squamous cell lung carcinoma when used alone or in combination with MVP. The regimen containing cisplatin had marginally increased activity that did not translate into a clinically significant survival advantage.

It is estimated that nearly one-third of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) may represent bronchogenic carcinoma. The noninvasive imaging methods used currently (ie, plain radiography, computed tomography) are not reliable for accurate detection of malignancy in most SPNs. The authors prospectively evaluated use of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) for identification of malignancy in 20 patients with noncalcific, radiographically indeterminate SPNs. PET-FDG imaging demonstrated focal hypermetabolism in 13 biopsy-proved malignant nodules, whereas no increased FDG uptake was seen in the seven benign SPNs. Semiquantitative analysis with computation of differential uptake ratios also helped clearly differentiate benign nodules (mean +/- standard deviation, 0.56 +/- 0.27) from malignant nodules (mean +/- standard deviation, 5.63 +/- 2.38) (P less than .001). Thus, PET-FDG imaging may be a potentially useful noninvasive technique for accurate differentiation of benign and malignant SPNs that are radiographically indeterminate.

One hundred forty-two patients with progressive, hormonally refractory advanced prostate carcinoma who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomized to receive either combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and mitomycin C (FAM) or sequential chemotherapy with the same agents, i.e., mitomycin C, followed by doxorubicin on disease progression, followed by 5-FU. Objective tumor regressions were observed in 10 of 70 (14%) patients receiving the FAM treatment arm and 10 of 72 (14%) patients initially receiving mitomycin C. Of the 24 patients who received secondary therapy with doxorubicin alone, 3 (12.5%) achieved objective tumor regression. There were no responses among five patients who received tertiary therapy with 5-FU alone. The median survival time for all patients treated with the combination arm was 8.7 months, compared with 7.1 months for patients who received the FAM arm (P = 0.025). However, this modest survival advantage in favor of the FAM treatment arm must be weighed against significantly more myelosuppression experienced by these patients. The chemotherapeutic regimens used in this study have only minor clinical value in the treatment of hormonally refractory advanced prostate cancer.

Objective: To compare the survival of patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with thoracic radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy., Design: Randomized, prospective phase III trial., Setting: Multi-institutional cooperative oncology group., Patients: A total of 121 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 7 (5.8%) were ineligible. All patients were ambulatory and had measurable or evaluable disease. Before they were randomized, patients were stratified by ECOG performance score, histologic type, maximum tumor diameter, and NCCTG institution., Interventions: Radiotherapy consisted of a total of 5000 cGy in 5 weeks with a 1000 cGy boost in 5 fractions to a small tumor field. Combined modality therapy was MACC which is intravenous methotrexate, intravenous doxorubicin, intravenous cyclophosphamide, and oral lomustine (CCNU), on day 1 and 28. Chemotherapy was followed by identical thoracic radiotherapy 4 weeks after the second cycle of chemotherapy. Four weeks after thoracic radiotherapy was completed, patients received another two cycles of identical chemotherapy. Patients who had progression of disease after chest irradiation only were treated with MACC chemotherapy., Main Results: Major clinical responses were observed in 31 of 56 (55%; 95% Cl, 42% to 68%) patients treated with combination therapy and 37 of 58 (64%; Cl, 51% to 76%) treated with radiation only (P greater than 0.2). The median time to progression was 192 days with radiotherapy only compared with 199 days for combined modality therapy (P greater than 0.2). The median survival time was 313 days compared with 317 days, respectively (P greater than 0.2). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates after thoracic radiation only were 45% (Cl, 32% to 58%), 16% (Cl, 6% to 25%), and 7%. With chemoradiotherapy, the survival rates were 46% (Cl, 33% to 60%), 21% (Cl, 11% to 32%), and 5%, respectively. Myelosuppression was significantly greater for the combined modality therapy arm (P = 0.002)., Conclusion: Chemotherapy with MACC, in combination with thoracic radiotherapy, did not result in significant survival advantage compared with radiation alone (P greater than 0.2) in patients with medically inoperable or unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.