Search

The article presents a study of the potential of early binding antibody (BAb) titers or different interferon-beta (IFN-b) biomarkers to predict neutralizing antibodies (NAb). The study included patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) that receive de novo IFN-b treatment. Results showed that BAb titers reliably predict Nabs, with CXCL-10 as a potential sensitive biomarker for IFN-b response and abrogation by anti-IFN-b antibodies.

Background: MxA gene expression is one of the most appropriate markers of biological activity of exogenous interferon (IFN) beta. Methods: We quantified MxA mRNA for five consecutive days in 62 patients treated with IFN beta (16, Avonex; 10, Betaferon; 24, Rebif 22; 12, Rebif 44), by quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction. Every three months, IFN beta induced neutralising antibodies (NAbs) were evaluated in sera using a cytopathic effect assay. Results: Two categories of patients were identified: one group (49/62) hada sharp post-injection increase in MxA expression (defined as "IFN beta biological responder"), whereas the other group (13/62) had no MxA induction after IFN beta administrations (defined as "IFN beta biological non-responder"). In 11 / 13 biological non-responders, the persistent presence of NAbs correlated with abolished biological activity, independently of treatment regimen. The two remain in- IFN beta biological non-responders were NAb-. Among the 49 IFN beta biological responders, biological activity was comparable between the four preparations on day 2 and 3 (+12 and +36 hours post-injection), but it was greater in Betaferon and both Rebif preparations on day 1,4, and 5. In biological responders treated three times a week, only 82% (59/72) of injections were considered effective, compared with 100% (13/13) of Avonex injections. Conclusion: Our results suggest that an optimal IFN beta regimen is not yet available: Avonex, given once a week, shows lower cumulative biological activity. On the other hand, both Betaferon and Rebif, given three times a week, show 18% biologically ineffective injections and higher risk of developing NAbs, which abolish biological activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Neurofilament light chain (NFL) is a neuroaxonal cytoskeletal protein released into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and eventually into blood upon neuronal injury. Its detection in serum (sNFL) makes it a promising marker in multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of a single dosage of sNFL in clinical practice., Methods: 626 consecutive relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for at least 12 months underwent a single sNFL dosage. 553 patients had NEDA-3 status (no relapses, no disability progression, no new/enlarging or contrast-enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging) in the 12 months prior blood sampling. sNFL levels were measured by single molecule array (Simoa™). Association between sNFL levels and NEDA-3 status at 12, 24, and 36 months was evaluated with logistic regression models adjusted for sex, EDSS, disease duration, and type of DMTs., Results: 469 out of the 553 NEDA-3 patients had normal sNFL level, whereas 42 had elevated level. The two groups did not differ regarding baseline characteristics. A very strong association between elevated sNFL levels and loss of NEDA-3 status within 12 months was found, with an odds ratio [OR] of 10.74 (95% CI 4.34-26.57); 15 and 10 patients with normal and elevated sNFL, respectively lost NEDA-3 (p < 0.001). The effect was not detected during the subsequent 13-24 and 25-36 months., Conclusions: A single elevated sNFL is strongly associated with NEDA-3 loss within 1 year. Elevated sNFL in apparently stable patients suggests an ongoing disease activity below the detection threshold of standard parameters., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: Malucchi Simona received compensation for speaking and consulting from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche. Valentino Paola received speaker honoraria from Roche, research support from Merck, grant support from Quanterix. Bava Cecilia Irene: nothing to discose. Martire Serena: nothing to disclose. Di Sapio Alessia received compensation for speaking and consulting by Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Alexion, Sandoz and reimbursement by Merck, Biogen, Genzyme and Roche for attending conferences. Lo Re Marianna received compensation for consulting by Novartis. Bertolotto Antonio served on the scientific advisory board of Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Genzyme; received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi, grant support from Almiral, Biogen, Associazione San Luigi Gonzaga ONLUS, Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS, Mylan, Novartis and the Italian Multiple sclerosis Society. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the ethical committee of San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital (approvals number 7262/2019 and 18,390/2019). All participants provided informed consent., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: In the field of research for new validated surrogate biomarkers of treatment efficacy, disease activity and progression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), serum neurofilament light-chain (sNFL) are actually the best candidate for MS patient monitoring. However, before they can be implemented in clinical practice, their usefulness as additional red flag routine measure must be demonstrated. To tackle the problem, this real-life cross-sectional study at the Regional Referring Center for Multiple Sclerosis (CRESM) aims to characterize sNFL levels and prevalence of elevated sNFL, according to our age-dependent cut-off values, in a large group of patients with different types of MS and treatment conditions., Methods: 908 serum samples from as many MS patients being admitted at CRESM for diagnostic definition and/or during routinary treatment monitoring were consecutively collected between January 2019 and January 2020. sNFL levels were measured by single molecule array (Simoa™) technology on SR-X instrument using NF-light assays (Quanterix); results were interpreted using previously published cut-off values., Results: Primary and Secondary Progressive MS (PPMS, SPMS) forms demonstrate higher levels and prevalence of elevated sNFL (PPMS= 32 %, SPMS= 21 %) compared to the Relapse and Remitting one (RRMS = 12 %). Besides, naïve samples of RRMS and PPMS subtypes showed higher prevalence of elevated sNFL (RRMS naïve= 31 %, PPMS naïve=67 %) compared to samples from patients treated for more than 12 months (RRMS treat>12m= 9 %, PPMS treat>12m= 19 %); treated SPMS patients demonstrated higher sNFL levels and a prevalence (22 %) of elevated sNFL compared to RRMS treated patients. Focusing on RRMS, no statistical difference was found between groups of patients treated for whatever time (up to or more than 60 months) and with either DMT type (high or low-efficacy DMT). Finally, RRMS patients treated with all DMTs for more than 12 months, with the exception of teriflunomide and alemtuzumab showed a prevalence of elevated sNFL in the range of 5-10 %., Conclusion: in a real-world setting comprising about 1000 MS patients, sNFL quantification was elevated in 5-to-67 % of patients, in different MS forms and treatment conditions. Elevated levels of sNFL must be considered a red-flag suggesting the need of a further clinical monitoring in any circumstance, as it can be indicative of new inflammation, ongoing degeneration or co-morbidities. This study supports the introduction of sNFL quantification in everyday patient management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Antonio Bertolotto reports financial support was provided by Roche SpA. Antonio Bertolotto reports financial support was provided by Italian Multiple Sclerosis Association. Paola Valentino reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Paola Valentino reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Paola Valentino reports a relationship with Roche SpA that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Paola Valentino reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: funding grants. Paola Valentino reports a relationship with Quanterix Corp that includes: funding grants. Simona Malucchi reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Simona Malucchi reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Simona Malucchi reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Simona Malucchi reports a relationship with Roche SpA that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Serena Martire reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Serena Martire reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Almirall that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, and funding grants. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Bayer that includes: board membership and consulting or advisory. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: board membership, consulting or advisory, funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Genzyme Corporation that includes: board membership and consulting or advisory. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Associazione San Luigi Gonzaga ONLUS that includes: funding grants. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS that includes: funding grants. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: funding grants. Antonio Bertolotto reports a relationship with Italian Multiple Sclerosis Association that includes: funding grants. Rugiada Bottero reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory. Rugiada Bottero reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: consulting or advisory. Rugiada Bottero reports a relationship with Merck that includes: consulting or advisory. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Biogen that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Roche that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: consulting or advisory, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Alexion that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Merck that includes: travel reimbursement. Alessia Di Sapio reports a relationship with Genzyme Corporation that includes: travel reimbursement. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: EASIER is a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study investigating the consumption of healthcare resources, including healthcare professional (HCP) active working time, the costs associated with the current natalizumab intravenous (IV) administration, and the potential impact of the adoption of subcutaneous (SC) route., Methods: The EASIER study has three parts: (1) time and motion study to measure healthcare resources and working time needed for natalizumab IV administration using a digital data collection tool operated directly by HCPs; (2) HCP structured questionnaire-based estimation of the potential impact of natalizumab SC vs. IV administration; and (3) patient survey on the burden of natalizumab administration., Results: Nine Italian multiple sclerosis (MS) centers measured 404 IV natalizumab administration procedures and administered 26 HCP questionnaires and 297 patient questionnaires. Patients had a mean of 52 (range 1-176) previous IV administrations and spent a mean (median, IQR) of 152 (130, 94-184) minutes in the center per each IV procedure, with IV infusion covering 50% of the total. Including patient travel time, an average of 5 h was dedicated to each IV administration. Active working time by HCP amounted to 29 min per IV administration procedure, 70% of which by nursing staff. With adoption of the SC route, HCPs estimated a 50% reduction in patient procedure time and 55% lower HCP active working time. This translated into a 63% cost reduction for the MS center per natalizumab administration procedure., Conclusions: SC natalizumab administration will consistently reduce consumption of patient and HCP times per procedure and associated costs., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended to people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and, to ensure durable immunity, a third booster dose has been administered in several countries. Data about potential risks associated with the third booster dose in pwMS, such as vaccine-triggered disease exacerbations, are still scarce., Objective: To investigate whether the administration of a third booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was associated with an increased risk of short-term disease reactivation in a large cohort of pwMS., Methods: We retrospectively selected 1265 pwMS who received a third booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including the presence, number and characteristics of relapses in the 60 days prior to and after the third booster dose., Results: In the selected cohort, the relapse rate in the two months after administration of the third booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines did not increase when compared with the prior two months. Indeed, the percentage of pwMS experiencing relapses in the 60 days following the administration of the third booster dose was 2.1%, similar to the percentage recorded in 60 days prior to vaccination, which was 1.9%., Conclusions: The third booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines appeared to be safe for pwMS., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a prevalent and debilitating manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS); however, it is not included in the widely used concept of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3). We expanded the NEDA-3 concept to NEDA-3 + by encompassing CI assessed through the Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT) and evaluated the effect of teriflunomide on NEDA3 + in patients treated in a real-world setting. The value of NEDA-3 + in predicting disability progression was also assessed., Methods: This 96-weeks observational study enrolled patients already on treatment with teriflunomide for ≥ 24 weeks. The predictiveness of NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + at 48 weeks on the change in motor disability at 96 weeks was compared through a two-sided McNemar test., Results: The full analysis set (n = 128; 38% treatment naïve) featured relatively low level of disability (baseline EDSS = 1.97 ± 1.33). NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + statuses were achieved by 82.8% and 64.8% of patients, respectively at 48 weeks vs. baseline, and by 57.0% and 49.2% of patients, respectively at 96 weeks vs. baseline. All patients except one were free of disability progression at Week 96, and NEDA-3 and NEDA-3 + were equally predictive. Most patients were free of relapse (87.5%), disability progression (94.5%) and new MRI activity (67.2%) comparing 96 weeks with baseline. SDMT scores were stable in patients with baseline score ˃35 and improved significantly in those with baseline score ≤ 35. Treatment persistence was high (81.0% at Week 96)., Conclusion: Teriflunomide confirmed its real-world efficacy and was found to have a potentially beneficial effect on cognition., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: B-cell-depleting agents have been widely used for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG-associated diseases (MOGAD), but no consensus exists on the optimal dose and frequency of treatment administration. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of a Rituximab (RTX) personalized treatment approach based on CD27-positive B-cell monitoring on efficacy, safety, and infusion rates., Methods: This is a retrospective, uncontrolled, single-center study including patients with NMOSD and MOGAD treated with RTX at a tertiary multiple sclerosis center at the San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy. All the patients were treated with RTX induction, followed by maintenance infusion at the dosage of 1000 mg according to cell repopulation: initially according to total CD19-positive B-cell monitoring (> 0.1% of lymphocytes), and subsequently according to CD27-positive B-cell repopulation (> 0.05% of lymphocytes for the first 2 years, and subsequently > 0.1%). NMOSD and MOGAD activity was assessed as clinical or MRI activity. All patients were screened of the occurrence of severe adverse events (AEs)., Results: A total of 19 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 7.64 years (range 3.09-16.25). The annualized relapse rate (ARR) 1 year before RTX start was 2.37 [Standard deviation (SD), 1.34] and decreased to 0.08 (SD 0.11) in the subsequent years after RTX initiation. ARR did not differ before and after start of CD27 monitoring. Median inter-dose time was 8.80 (range 5.78-14.23) before CD27 monitoring and 15.93 months (range 8.56-35.37) after CD27 monitoring (p < 0.001). We observed no AEs., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that in our cohort CD27-positive B-cell-based RTX reinfusion regimen was able to reduce the number of RTX reinfusions relative to CD19-positive B-cell monitoring, with comparable efficacy and safety profile. In order to achieve an even more individualized and effective treatment, the FCGR3A genetic polymorphisms could be evaluated when assessing RTX efficacy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared decision-making in complex treatment choices, highlighting the importance of the patient's rationale and motivation for switching therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different modalities of changing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, cognitive profile and attitude and preferences of patients concerning treatment choice., Methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 28 Italian MS centers in the period between June 2016 and June 2017. We screened all MS patients treated with any DMT, with a treatment compliance of at least 80% of therapy administered during the 3 last months who needed to modify MS therapy because of efficacy, safety or other reasons during a follow-up visit. At the time of switching the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and the Control Preference Scale (CPS) were evaluated. According to the CPS, patients were classified as "active" (i.e. who prefer making the medical decision themselves), "collaborative" (i.e. who prefer decisions be made jointly with the physician), or "passive" (i.e. who prefer the physician make the decision)., Results: Out of 13,657 patients recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%) patients, 69.6% were female and with mean age 40.6 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. According to the CPS score evaluation, a significant high percentage of patients (51.1%) were considered collaborative, 74 patients (22.5%) were passive, and 60 (18.2%) patients were active. Stratifying according to CPS results, we found a higher SDMT score among collaborative patients compared to active and passive ones (45.8 ± 12.3 versus 41.0 ± 13.2 versus 41.7 ± 12.8, p < 0.05)., Conclusion: In this study, the CPS evaluation showed that more than 50% of patients who needed to change therapy chose a "collaborative" role in making treatment decision. Cognitive profile with SDMT seems to correlate with patients' preference on treatment decision, showing better scores in collaborative patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Francesco Patti has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Clara G. Chisari has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Simona Toscano declares no conflict of interest. Pietro Annovazzi has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Paola Banfi has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Roberto Bergamaschi has received honoraria for lectures, travel and registration coverage for attending several national or international congresses or symposia from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Raffaella Clerici has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Meck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Marta Zaffira Conti declares there is no conflict of interest. Antonio Cortese has received speaker honoraria, travel grants, advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Roberta Fantozzi has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA Diana Ferraro declares there is no conflict of interest. Mariano Fischetti declares there is no conflict of interest. Maura Frigo declares there is no conflict of interest. Maurizia Gatto declares there is no conflict of interest. Paolo Immovilli has received speaking honoraria, consulting fees, advisory board honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Stefania Leoni declares there is no conflict of interest. Simona Malucchi has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA Giorgia Maniscalco has received honoraria for public speaking and advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. Girolama Alessandra Marfia is an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA Damiano Paolicelli has received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Paola Perini has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Carlo Serrati declares no conflict of interest. Rocco Totaro has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Alfa Wasserman, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. Gabriella Turano has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. Paola Valentino has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Mauro Zaffaroni has received honoraria for lecturing or participating for advisory boards or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Cristina Zuliani has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. Diego Centonze is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: Extended interval dosing (EID) of Natalizumab (NAT) has been proposed to reduce progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk associated with standard interval dosing (SID) in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previous studies have suggested that NAT effectiveness is maintained in the great majority of patients who switch from SID to EID; monitoring of disease activity is currently based exclusively on clinical and MRI parameters. Frequent MRI are expensive and not always applicable, underlining the need for biological markers able to detect central nervous system lesions. Serum Neurofilament-light chain (sNFL) currently represents the most promising biomarker of disease activity, prognosis and treatment response in MS, and their clinical suitability is increasingly evident. The objective of the present study is to assess the applicability of sNFL as additional/alternative measure of treatment efficacy during EID regimen., Methods: We measured sNFL by Simoa technology in longitudinal samples from 63 Relapsing Remitting (RR) MS patients switched from SID to EID., Inclusion Criteria: diagnosis of RRMS, age 18-60 years; NAT SID for at least 12 months; NEDA-3 (no evidence of disease activity) for at least 12 months; availability of at least 2 serum samples collected 6 months apart. Patients' follow-up time during EID was at least 12 months and 2 blood samples were collected after at least 6 and 12 months. Clinical examination was performed before each infusion, while MRI 6 and 12 months after NAT initiation and according to PML risk during the whole study., Results: No patients showed clinical or MRI activity during the whole follow-up. sNFL levels measured during SID and EID were comparable, without significant difference between groups. The effect of EID on NFL levels did not show significant effects (LMM, p> 0.05) and sNFL levels did not vary with time during SID or EID protocols (LMM, p> 0.05). Intra-individual sNFL levels demonstrated overall stability during SID and EID (median CV=11% between SID and EID samples). According to our previously published reference values, sNFL levels were in the normal range in all samples, both during SID and EID., Conclusions: Our results suggest that sNFL quantification can be used as an alternative/additional approach to MRI in managing individual patients. The present work provides a new clinical application of sNFL to monitor NAT efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Valentino Paola received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Roche, research support from Merck and grant support from Quanterix. Malucchi Simona received speaker honoraria from Biogen. Martire Serena received speaker honoraria from Biogen and Novartis and served on the advisory boards of Biogen and Novartis Bava Cecilia Irene: nothing to discose Capobianco Marco served on the scientific advisory board of Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, and Bayer Schering and received speaker honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. Bertolotto Antonio served on the scientific advisory board of Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, and Genzyme; received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi and grant support from Almiral, Biogen, Associazione San Luigi Gonzaga ONLUS, Fondazione per la Ricerca Biomedica ONLUS, Mylan, Novartis and the Italian Multiple sclerosis Society., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Assessing the risk of clinical and radiological reactivation during pregnancy and post partum in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with natalizumab (NTZ) throughout pregnancy (LONG&#95;EXP) compared with women interrupting treatment before (NO&#95;EXP) and within >-30 days and ≤90 days from conception (SHORT&#95;EXP), and describing newborns' outcomes., Methods: Maternal clinical and radiological outcomes and obstetric and fetal outcomes were retrospectively collected and compared among groups (NO&#95;EXP, SHORT&#95;EXP, LONG&#95;EXP). Predictors of clinical and radiological reactivation were investigated through univariable and multivariable analysis., Results: 170 eligible pregnancies from 163 women referring to 29 Italian MS centres were included. Annualised relapse rate (ARR) was significantly lower in LONG&#95;EXP (n=66, 0.02 (0.001-0.09)) compared with NO&#95;EXP (n=31, 0.43 (0.21-0.75), p=0.002) and SHORT&#95;EXP (n=73, 0.46 (0.30-0.66), p=0.0004) during pregnancy, and in LONG&#95;EXP (0.12 (0.05-0.24)) compared with SHORT&#95;EXP (0.30 (0.17-0.50), p=0.008) during post partum. Gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions were less frequent in LONG&#95;EXP (n=6/50, 2.00%) compared with NO&#95;EXP (n=9/21, 42.86%) and SHORT&#95;EXP after delivery (n=17/49, 34.69%, p=0.010).Delaying NTZ resumption after delivery significantly increased the risk of relapses (OR=1.29 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.57), p=0.009) and Gd+ lesions (OR=1.49 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.89, p=0.001). Newborns' weight, length, head circumference and gestational age did not differ among groups after adjusting for confounders. Anaemia was tracked in 4/69 LONG&#95;EXP newborns. Congenital anomaly rate was within the expected range for the untreated MS population., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that in women with MS treated with NTZ before conception, continuation of NTZ throughout pregnancy and its early resumption after delivery mitigate the risk of clinical and radiological reactivation. This approach has no major impact on newborns' outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DL received travel funding from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, speaking or consultations fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Teva, Biogen, Roche; FB received teaching honoraria from Novartis; AGr reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; PA received travel support, compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards and speaker's fees from Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Merck-Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; ABe reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; ABi reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; GB received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche; VB received fees for consultancies or public speaking from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Genzyme and Biogen; SB has been founded for advisory board, academic purposes and speech honoraria by Genzyme, Roche, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Almirall; MCB has advisory board membership and honoraria for speaking from Teva, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck-Serono and Biogen; FC received honoraria for advisory board and/or for public speaking, and/or travel grant, from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche; RCa received lecture fees and/or travel grants from Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Celgene and Merck; DC is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceutical, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme; RCe has received funding for travel and/or speaker honoraria from Sanofy, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono and Roche; CGC received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; MCa received personal compensation for speaking/advising/consulting from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Teva, EMF Serono; was supported in travelling expenses for congresses from Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Almirall; received research grants from Italian MS Foundation (FISM), Italian Ministry of Research, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Novartis; ECo received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Admirall; CC received personal compensation for advisory board and speaking from: Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Almirall, Merck-Serono; ECu received fees for advisory boards and speaking honoraria from Merck-Serono, Novartis and Biogen, travel funding from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Roche, Novartis and Teva; AD reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript; EDA received speaking honoraria from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bayer-Schering; GDL served on scientific advisory boards for Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme and Roche, and has received travel and/or speaker honoraria from Merck, Roche, Teva, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme; MDF participated on advisory boards for and received speaker or writing honoraria and funding for travelling from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche and Teva; DF has received travel grants, speaker honoraria and/or research support to her institution by Merck-Serono, Biogen, Roche, Genzyme, Novartis, Teva and Binding Site; AGa received speaker and consulting fees from Actelion, Biogen, Coloplast, Merck-Serono, Mylan, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva; CG received fee as speaker or advisory board from Merck, Biogen, Teva, Bayer, Roche, Sanofi, Almirall; FG received research funding from Sanofi-Genzyme and Biogen, fees for advisory boards and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono and Roche, travel funding from Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono and Roche; MI received grants from NIH, NMSS, FISM; received fees for consultation from Roche, Genzyme, Merck, Biogen and Novartis; RL received fees for consultancies or public speaking from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Genzyme and Biogen; LL received travel grant, speaker fee and consultancy from Biogen Idec, Teva, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche and Admirall; GL received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, Roche; MM received personal fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis and Almirall; MM has scientific advisory board membership of Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva; consulting and/or speaking fees, research support or travel grants from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, CSL, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Teva, Roche, Ultragenix; principal investigator in clinical trials for Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Ultragenix, CSL Behring; LM received honoraria for speaking activity at scientific meetings and/or advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche; CGN received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck-Serono; VN has received consulting fees from Novartis, Roche, Mylan, Biogen Idec, Merk and Bayer; speaker and writing honoraria from Mylan, Teva, Biogen Idec, Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme and Merk; travel grants from Teva, Biogen Idec, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Novartis; FPa received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer-Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; EP received compensation for travel grants, participation in advisory board and/or speaking activities from Biogen, Merck-Serono, Sanofi, Teva and Novartis; serves on the editorial board of Frontiers in Neurology and Brain Sciences; CP received honoraria for speaking or consultation fee from Almirall, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Roche; PR received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory board by: Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Teva, Roche; GS received travel expenses or honoraria for speaking or participating to advisory board by: Biogen idec, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche; ESi received speaker honoraria and/or consultancy from Biogen, Teva, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Almirall, Roche; FV has received travel grants and/or speaker honoraria by Merck-Serono, Biogen, Roche, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva; RT has served on advisory boards and/or received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Biogen, Laborest, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; MPS received personal fees from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, GeNeuro and Medday, outside the submitted work; MPA received research grants and honoraria as a speaker and member of advisory boards by: Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Almirall, Celgene and Roche; GAM received speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer-Schering, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: Several studies have assessed risk factors associated with the severity of COVID-19 outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The potential role of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and demographic and clinical factors on the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been evaluated so far. The objective of this study was to assess risk factors of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection in PwMS by using data collected in the Italian MS Register (IMSR)., Methods: A case-control (1:2) study was set up. Cases included PwMS with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, and controls included PwMS without a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Both groups were propensity score-matched by the date of COVID-19 diagnosis, the date of last visit, and the region of residence. No healthy controls were included in this study. COVID-19 risk was estimated by multivariable logistic regression models including demographic and clinical covariates. The impact of DMTs was assessed in 3 independent logistic regression models including one of the following covariates: last administered DMT, previous DMT sequences, or the place where the last treatment was administered., Results: A total of 779 PwMS with confirmed COVID-19 (cases) were matched to 1,558 PwMS without COVID-19 (controls). In all 3 models, comorbidities, female sex, and a younger age were significantly associated ( p < 0.02) with a higher risk of contracting COVID-19. Patients receiving natalizumab as last DMT (OR [95% CI]: 2.38 [1.66-3.42], p < 0.0001) and those who underwent an escalation treatment strategy (1.57 [1.16-2.13], p = 0.003) were at significantly higher COVID-19 risk. Moreover, PwMS receiving their last DMT requiring hospital access (1.65 [1.34-2.04], p < 0.0001) showed a significant higher risk than those taking self-administered DMTs at home., Discussion: This case-control study embedded in the IMSR showed that PwMS at higher COVID-19 risk are younger, more frequently female individuals, and with comorbidities. Long-lasting escalation approach and last therapies that expose patients to the hospital environment seem to significantly increase the risk of SARS-CoV2 infection in PwMS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that among patients with MS, younger age, being female individuals, having more comorbidities, receiving natalizumab, undergoing an escalating treatment strategy, or receiving treatment at a hospital were associated with being infected with COVID-19. Among patients with MS who were infected with COVID-19, a severe course was associated with increasing age and having a progressive form of MS, whereas not being on treatment or receiving an interferon beta agent was protective., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Serum Neurofilament Light (sNFL) is the most promising marker for patient's monitoring in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, operating reference values for use in clinical practice are still lacking. Here, we defined sNFL reference cut-off values in a cohort of healthy controls (HC) and assessed their performance in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients, as well as the intra-individual sNFL variability., Methods: We measured sNFL by single molecule array (Simoa) assay in 79 HC assessing their correlation with age. Changes of sNFL levels were evaluated during a short-term follow-up (median 67 days between consecutive samples) in a subgroup of 27 participants. sNFL were tested in 23 untreated MS patients, at both diagnostic time and start of therapy (median 80 days after), considering disease activity., Results: Findings confirmed a correlation between sNFL levels and age in HC, thus cut-off values specific for age decades were calculated. sNFL did not vary significantly with time during short-term follow-up (median CV 13%). sNFL levels in MS patients were higher and demonstrated a higher variability between diagnostic time and treatment start (median CV 39%). According to cut-off values, "pathologic" sNFL levels were found in 57% of MS patients at diagnostic time, and in 30% of samples at treatment start. In particular, "pathologic" sNFL levels were found in 80% of samples (16/20) obtained during a phase of disease activity, while a total of 85% of samples (22/26) associated with inactive disease showed sNFL in the normal range., Conclusion: This study demonstrates an overall intra-individual stability of sNFL values in the short-term in HC and suggests age-dependent reference cut-off values that could be beneficial for sNFL implementation in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (MS) has a highly active and aggressive course, which can have a devastating effect on the physical and cognitive functioning of a child if not treated appropriately with effective disease-modifying drugs. The optimal treatment strategy of pediatric MS is currently unknown and debate continues as to whether treatment escalation or initiation of a highly active therapy provides a better outcome. Here, we present the case of a 16-year-old female diagnosed with highly active relapsing-remitting MS (age at onset: 14 years) who received first-line treatment with fingolimod within 1 year of the first recorded symptom. Since starting fingolimod, the course of the disease has essentially been stable. No new or active lesions were observed in magnetic resonance imaging scans performed at 3 and 12 months after starting fingolimod, and treatment was well tolerated. These data suggest that, in this case, early treatment with first-line fingolimod was able to slow disease progression.

Background: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody leading to B lymphocyte depletion, is increasingly used as an off-label treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting (RR) and progressive MS., Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on consecutive MS patients treated off-label with rituximab in 22 Italian and 1 Swiss MS centers. Relapse rate, time to first relapse, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, incidence of adverse events, and radiological outcomes from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed., Results: A total of 355/451 enrolled subjects had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Annualized relapse rate significantly decreases after rituximab initiation versus the pre-rituximab start year in RRMS (from 0.86 to 0.09, p  < .0001) and in secondary-progressive (SP) MS (from 0.34 to 0.06, p  < .0001) and had a slight decrease in primary-progressive (PP) MS patients (from 0.12 to 0.07, p  = 0.45). After 3 years from rituximab start, the proportion of patients with a confirmed EDSS progression was 14.6% in the RRMS group, 24.7% in the SPMS group, and 41.5% in the PPMS group. No major safety concerns arose., Conclusion: Consistently with other observational studies, our data show effectiveness of rituximab in reducing disease activity in patients with MS.

Background: clinical factors and frequency of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) changes/interruptions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to describe reasons of MS treatment modifications in a large cohort of Italian MS patients., Methods: this multicenter, cross-sectional non interventional study (SWITCH) conducted at 28 Italian MS centers, screened, by visit/telephone contact between June 2016 and June 2017, all RRMS patients receiving stable DMT treatment and enrolled patients with change in DMT treatment., Results: out of 13,657 recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%), met the study criteria and were considered eligible. Among 303 (90.2% of 336) patients switching, the most common reason was "lack of efficacy" (58.4% of 303). Among 30 (8.9%) patients who interrupted treatment temporarily, the most common reason was pregnancy (40.0% of 30). Out of 3 (0.9%) patients who discontinued treatment permanently, 2 (66.7%) had as first reason as "patient decision". Multivariate analysis showed that EDSS was the only variable with statistically significant effect on changing treatments (r = 8.33; p-value of Type III Sum of Squares = 0.016)., Conclusion: in our study, 303 (90.2% of eligible patients) switched treatment, 30 (8.9%) interrupted treatment temporarily, and 3 (0.9%) discontinued treatment permanently. Efficacy remains the main driving force behind switching behavior, as the primary aim of treatment is to be disease free or reduce disease activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: F.P. has received honoraria for speaking activities by Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he also served as advisory board member the following companies: Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA; he was also funded by Pfizer and FISM for epidemiological studies; he received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.G.C. has received grants for congress participation from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. E.D'A. has received grants for speaking activities from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA and grants for congress participation from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.A. has received honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards, and/or travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.B. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. R.B: has received honoraria for lectures, travel and registration coverage for attending several national or international congresses or symposia from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.C. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Meck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.C. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. A.C. has received speaker honoraria, travel grants, advisory boards member honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. R.F. has received consulting fees and honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and TEVA. M.Fi. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. M.Fr. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, TEVA, and Sanofi Genzyme. M.G. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.I. has received speaking honoraria, consulting fees, advisory board honoraria from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA S.L. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. S.M. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria in advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. G.M. has received honoraria for public speaking and advisory boards from Biogen, Novartis, and Merck Serono. G.A.M. is an Advisory Board member of Biogen Idec, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. She is the principal investigator in clinical trials for Actelion, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. D.P. has received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.S. Author declares there is no conflict of interest. P.P. has received speaker honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. P.S. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, and travel grants from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. R.T. has received speaker's honoraria, consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Alfa Wasserman, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi genzyme, and TEVA. G.T. has received support for attendance to scientific meetings from Almirall, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme. P.V. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fee, honoraria for advisory boards from Biogen Idec, Novartis, Merck Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. M.Z. has received honoraria for lecturing or participating for advisory boards or travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. C.Z. has received speaker's honoraria and consulting fees, honoraria for advisory boards, support for attendance of scientific meetings from Almirall, Bayer Shering, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. D.C. is an Advisory Board member of Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA, and received honoraria for speaking or consultation fees from Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen, GW Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and TEVA. He is also the principal investigator in clinical trials for Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and TEVA. His preclinical and clinical research was supported by grants from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate disease activity according to rituximab (RTX) induction and maintenance regimens in a multicenter real-life dataset of NMOSD patients., Methods: This is an observational-retrospective multicentre study including patients with NMOSD treated with RTX in 21 Italian and 1 Swiss centers. Demographics, relapse rate and adverse events over the follow-up were summarized taking into account induction strategy (two-1 g infusions at a 15-day interval (IND-A) vs. 375 mg/m2/week infusions for one month (IND-B)) and maintenance therapy (regimen A (M-A) with fixed time-points infusions vs. regimen B (M-B) based on cytofluorimetric driven reinfusion regimens, the least further subdivided according to CD19+ B cells (M-B1) or CD27+ memory B cells (M-B2) monitoring)., Results: 131 subjects were enrolled, 127 patients completed the induction regimen and 119 patients had at least one follow-up visit and were included in the outcome analysis. Median follow-up was 1.7 years (range 0.1-11.6). Annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 1.7 in the year before RTX start and decreased to 0.19 during the follow-up. Both ARR and Time to first relapse (TTFR) analysis showed a trend toward an increased disease activity for IND-B and M-A. No patients with MT-B2 experienced relapses during the follow-up. Number of relapses in the year before RTX initiation and having received a previous treatment were significantly associated with higher ARR and reduced TTFR in the multivariate analysis., Interpretation: We confirm RTX efficacy in NMOSD patients. Use of specific induction and maintenance protocols is warranted in order to foster RTX efficacy and to reduce costs and side effects., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The exclusion of other diseases that can mimic multiple sclerosis (MS) is the cornerstone of current diagnostic criteria. However, data on the frequency of MS mimics in real life are incomplete., Methods: A total of 695 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of MS in any of the 22 RIREMS centers underwent a detailed diagnostic workup, including a brain and spinal cord MRI scan, CSF and blood examinations, and a 3-year clinical and radiologic follow-up., Findings: A total of 667 patients completed the study. Alternative diagnoses were formulated in 163 (24.4%) cases, the most frequent being nonspecific neurologic symptoms in association with atypical MRI lesions of suspected vascular origin (40 patients), migraine with atypical lesions (24 patients), and neuromyelitis optica (14 patients). MS was diagnosed in 401 (60.1%) patients according to the 2017 diagnostic criteria. The multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of CSF oligoclonal immunoglobulin G bands (IgG-OB) (odds ratio [OR] 18.113), the presence of atypical MRI lesions (OR 10.977), the absence of dissemination in space (DIS) of the lesions (OR 5.164), and normal visual evoked potentials (OR 3.550) were all independent predictors of an alternative diagnosis., Interpretation: This observational, unsponsored, real-life study, based on clinical practice, showed that diseases that mimicked MS were many, but more than 45% were represented by nonspecific neurologic symptoms with atypical MRI lesions of suspected vascular origin, migraine, and neuromyelitis optica. The absence of IgG-OB and DIS, the presence of atypical MRI lesions, and normal visual evoked potentials should be considered suggestive of an alternative disease and red flags for the misdiagnosis of MS., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

In this independent, multicenter, retrospective study, we investigated the short-term persistence to treatment with first-line self-injectable or oral disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Data of patients regularly attending 21 Italian MS Centres who started a self-injectable or an oral DMT in 2015 were collected to: (1) estimate the proportion of patients discontinuing the treatment; (3) explore reasons for discontinuation; (3) identify baseline predictors of treatment discontinuation over a follow-up period of 12 months. We analyzed data of 1832 consecutive patients (1289 women, 543 men); 374 (20.4%) of them discontinued the prescribed DMT after a median time of 6 months (range 3 days to 11.5 months) due to poor tolerability (n = 163; 43.6%), disease activity (n = 95; 25.4%), adverse events (n = 64; 17.1%), convenience (i.e. availability of new drug formulations) and pregnancy planning (n = 21; 1.1%). Although the proportion of discontinuers was higher with self-injectable (n = 107; 22.9%) than with oral DMT (n = 215; 16.4%), the Cox regression model revealed no significant between-group difference (p = 0.12). Female sex [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.39, p = 0.01] and previous exposure to ≥ 3 DMTs (HR = 1.71, p = 0.009) were two independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation, regardless of prescribed DMTs. Our study confirms that persistence to treatment represents a clinical challenge, irrespective of the route of administration.

Purpose: Mindfulness interventions have been shown to treat depressive symptoms and improve quality of life in patients with several chronic diseases, including multiple sclerosis, but to date most evaluation of the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions in multiple sclerosis have used patients receiving standard care as the control group. Hence we decided to evaluate the effectiveness of a group-based body-affective mindfulness intervention by comparing it with a psycho-educational intervention, by means of a randomized controlled clinical trial. The outcome variables (i.e., depression, anxiety, perceived stress, illness perception, fatigue and quality of life) were evaluated at the end of the interventions (T1) and after a further 6 months (T2). Methods: Of 90 multiple sclerosis patients with depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II score greater than 13) who were randomized, 71 completed the intervention (mindfulness group n = 36; psycho-educational group n = 35). The data were analyzed with GLM repeated-measures ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons. Results: Per-protocol analysis revealed a time by group interaction on Beck Depression Inventory-II score, with the mindfulness intervention producing a greater reduction in score than the psycho-educational intervention, both at T1 and at T2. Furthermore, the mindfulness intervention improved patients' quality of life and illness perception at T1 relative to the baseline and these improvements were maintained at the follow-up assessment (T2). Lastly, both interventions were similarly effective in reducing anxiety and perceived stress; these reductions were maintained at T2. A whole-sample intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis broadly confirmed the effectiveness of the mindfulness intervention. Conclusion: In conclusion, these results provide methodologically robust evidence that in multiple sclerosis patients with depressive symptoms mindfulness interventions improve symptoms of depression and anxiety and perceived stress, modulate illness representation and enhance quality of life and that the benefits are maintained for at least 6 months. Trial registration: the study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT02611401).

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a widely used treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), with incompletely defined mechanism of action. Short-term studies suggested its involvement in the modulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines and regulatory T cells (Treg), while long-term effect is still unknown. To investigate this aspect, we analyzed by flow-cytometry peripheral-blood Treg, natural killer (NK), CD4 and CD8 T-cells and anti-inflammatory CD14 + CD163 + monocytes from 37 healthy donor and 90 RRMS patients divided in untreated, treated with GA for 12months and from 34 to 192months. While NK, CD4 and CD8 T-cells did not show any significant differences among groups over time, we demonstrated that GA increased the anti-inflammatory monocytes and restored the Treg level in both GA-treated groups. Both these effects are a characteristic of responder patients and are observed not just in short-term but even after as long as a decade of GA treatment., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The choice of therapy in patients withdrawing from natalizumab treatment is still an open question and neurologists need strategies to manage this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate if alemtuzumab is able to control the disease when used in patient who have stopped natalizumab., Methods: 16 patients stopped natalizumab treatment after a median number of 20 infusions (range 12-114); all the patients were responders to natalizumab (neither clinical nor radiological activity during natalizumab therapy) and the reason for stopping was the risk of PML for all of them. Patients were switched to alemtuzumab after a median wash-out period of 70 days (range 41-99 days); patients underwent brain MRI every three months during natalizumab treatment and then just before starting alemtuzumab in order to exclude signs suggestive of PML; then, contrast-enhanced brain MRI was planned 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion., Results: At present, 8 out of 16 patients have a follow-up >6 months and 2 out of 8 reached 1-year follow-up; 5 have a follow-up of 3-6 months and 3 have a follow-up <3 months. Brain MRI at 6 months after alemtuzumab is available for 8 out of 16 patients and in all of them, neither signs of disease activity nor new lesions are present; in 2 out of 8 patients, brain MRI at 12 months is also available, showing no sign of disease activity. Clinical evaluation performed at 6 and at 12 months (when available) showed stability, in particular neither relapses nor increase in EDSS were observed., Conclusions: Alemtuzumab was able to control the disease course in patients who stopped natalizumab; of course, as this is a single-centre study and the number of patients is small, these findings are very preliminary and need further confirmation.

Objective: In this longitudinal study, we monitored two large groups of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and healthy controls (HC) for 2 years, with the aim of comparing their neuropsychological profile over time., Method: Three hundred and twenty-two patients with MS and 303 HC were administered the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological tests (BRB-N); neuropsychiatric measures were also administered. Two follow-ups were scheduled at 1 and 2 years, respectively., Results: A linear mixed model (LMM) with random intercept was run by considering participants' performance on each test of the BRB-N at the three assessment points (baseline and follow-ups) as the within-subjects variable, and group (patients and controls) as the between-subjects factor. The interaction term was statistically significant for the tests: Symbol Digit Modalities test (SDMT) (p = 0.044), Paced Auditory Serial Addition test (PASAT) (p = 0.011) and Word List Generation (WLG) (p < 0.001), whereas for the PASAT-3 approached statistical significance (p = 0.05). In addition, a LMM with random intercept was also run by identifying three groups (controls, relapsing-remitting course of MS (i.e. RR-MS), and prog-MS). The interaction term was statistically significant for: PASAT-3 (p = 0.017), PASAT-2 (p = 0.0026), and WLG (p = 0.0022)., Conclusions: Our results corroborate on a very large scale evidence that the abilities tapped by the tasks SDMT, PASAT and WLG are particularly sensitive to MS, and further extend this issue by showing that these abilities are likely to be more sensitive than others to the progression of the disease, as compared to HC.

Objective: The TRACER multicenter retrospective study aimed to collect data on treatment adherence in a real-life setting, in order to identify predictors of adherence at baseline., Methods: We recruited 384 relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis patients with at least 12 months of use of RebiSmart®. This electronic device records the performed injections and assesses adherence as the percentage of 'not missing doses', through the connection to the iMed database. Subjects with at least 80% of completed doses at the 12 month of therapy were defined 'treatment adherents'., Results: After 12 months, 89.3% of patients were adherent; 93.2% of patients aged 26-40 years at baseline were adherent (vs 79% of the ≤25 and 87.5% of the ≥41 year olds; p = 0.006). Furthermore, 90.5% of patients with a baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <4 showed ≥80% adherence (vs 71.4% in those with EDSS score ≥4; p = 0.016). Fifty-four percent of the patients who were not adherent after 3 months were also not adherent after 12 months (OR 16.8; CI 95%:7.1-39.8)., Conclusions: Patients aged 26-40 years and with an EDSS score <4 at baseline were the most adherent. The status of 'treatment adherent' in the first 3 months was predictive of higher adherence in the long term.

Objective: Intertrial variability (ITV) of motor responses to peripheral (CMAP) and transcranial (MEP) stimulation prevents their use in follow-up studies. Our purpose was to develop strategies to reduce and measure CMAP and MEP ITV to guide long-term monitoring of conduction slowing and conduction failure of peripheral and central motor pathway in the individual patient., Methods: Maximal compound muscle action potentials to High Voltage Electrical Stimulation (HVES) of lumbo-sacral nerve roots (r-CMAP) and activated, averaged motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) using double cone coil were recorded from 10 proximal and distal muscle districts of lower limbs. The procedure was repeated twice, 1-2 days apart, in 30 subjects, including healthy volunteers and clinically stable multiple sclerosis patients, using constant stimulating and recording sites and adopting a standardized procedure of voluntary activation. ITV for latency and area indexes and for the ratio between MEP and r-CMAP areas (a-Ratio) was expressed as Relative Intertrial Variation (RIV, 5th-95th percentile). As an inverse correlation between the size of area and ITV was found, raw ITV values were normalized as a function of area to make them comparable with one another., Results: All RIV values for latencies were significantly below the optimum threshold of ± 10%, with the exception of r-CMAP latencies recorded from Vastus Lateralis muscle. RIVs for a-Ratio, the most important index of central conduction failure, ranged from a maximum of -25.3% to +32.2% (Vastus Medialis) to a minimum of -15.0% to + 17.4% (Flexor Hallucis Brevis)., Conclusions: The described procedure represents an effort to lower as much as possible variability of motor responses in serial recording; the reported ITV normative values are the necessary premise to detect significant changes of motor conduction slowing and failure in the individual patient in follow-up studies.

Objective: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating autoimmune disease that imposes a significant emotional burden with heavy psychosocial consequences. Several studies have investigated the association between MS and mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, and recently researchers have focused also on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This is the first study that investigates the usefulness of proposing a treatment for PTSD to patients with MS., Methods: A randomized controlled trial with patients with MS diagnosed with PTSD comparing Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR; n = 20) and Relaxation Therapy (RT; n = 22). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants that no longer meet PTSD diagnosis as measured with Clinician Administered PTSD Scale 6-months after the treatment., Results: The majority of patients were able to overcome their PTSD diagnosis after only 10 therapy sessions. EMDR treatment appears to be more effective than RT in reducing the proportion of patients with MS suffering from PTSD. Both treatments are effective in reducing PTSD severity, anxiety and depression symptoms, and to improve Quality of Life., Conclusion: Although our results can only be considered preliminary, this study suggests that it is essential that PTSD symptoms are detected and that brief and cost-effective interventions to reduce PTSD and associated psychological symptoms are offered to patients, in order to help them to reduce the psychological burden associated with their neurological condition., Trial Registration: NCT01743664, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01743664.

Objectives: The objectives of this article are to test the feasibility of lumbar puncture (LP) using 25-gauge (G) needles in daily neurological practice and to compare the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) with four types of needles., Methods: In a prospective rater-blind study, pros and cons of four different LP needles, the 20G Quincke (20Q), 22G Sprotte (22S), 25G Whitacre (25W) and 25G Sprotte (25S), were evaluated in 394 LPs performed by seven neurologists. The neurologist performing the LP recorded the type and size of needle, intensity of pain, safety, time of the procedure and failure or success. Between five and 15 days later another neurologist, blind to the type of needle used, completed an ad-hoc questionnaire for PDPH., Results: PDPH developed in 35.9% patients when using a 20Q needle, and in 12.9%, 6.8% and 1.6%, respectively, when using a 22S, 25W or 25S needle. The difference in incidence of PDPH following LP performed with the 20Q needle and the 25S or 22S was statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and it approached significance when comparing the 25S and 25W (p = 0.06). As 25W and 25S needles need CSF aspiration, LP requires more time and skill. Pain caused by LP was similar with the four needles., Conclusion: The use of the 25S needle in diagnostic LP reduces the frequency and severity of PDPH., (© International Headache Society 2015.)