Search

This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). Brain metastases are the most common malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors. PET imaging with radiolabeled amino acids and to lesser extent [ 18 F]FDG has gained considerable importance in the assessment of brain metastases, especially for the differential diagnosis between recurrent metastases and treatment-related changes which remains a limitation using conventional MRI. The aim of this guideline is to assist nuclear medicine physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of brain PET imaging in patients with brain metastases. This practice guideline will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with brain metastases in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent to publish: Not applicable. Approval: This practice guideline was approved by the Board of Directors of the EANM, SNMMI, EANO and PET/RANO Working Group. Competing interests: AV: has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board participation from Curium, Eisai, General Electrics and Novartis. NT: no disclosures FC: no disclosures. SMC: no disclosures JF: has received honoraria for lectures and consultations from the following for-profit companies: Novartis, Seagen, Sanova, Servier. NG: has received honoraria for lectures from Blue Earth Diagnostics and for advisory board participation from Telix Pharmaceuticals and Servier, and for consultancy services from Telix Pharmaceuticals. JG: has received honoraria for consultation and advisory board participation from Seagan, Brain Lab, research support from Zeiss. EG: has received honoraria for consultation and advisory board participation from AAA/Novartis, Curium/LMI, General Electric, Keosys and Pfizer. RH: has received consultation fees for Telix, Servier, and Nuvation Bio and scientific advisory for Vysioneer,. DJ: has received honoraria for consultation and advisory board participation from Telix Pharmaceuticals, Cellectar and Novartis. IL: no disclosures. ELR: has received a research grant from BMS, and honoraria for advisory board participation from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Bioderix, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Seagen and Servier. SCS: has received honoraria and consulting fees from Chimerix, Servier, CeCaVa, Miltenyi, Roche and research support from Apollomics and Blue Earth Diagnostics. MJVdB: has received honoraria for consultation and advisory board participation from Servier, Anheart Therapeutics, Fore Biotherapeutics, Genenta, Roche, Chimerix, Mundipharm, Boehringer and Incyte, and research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. DVW: no disclosures. MAV: has received research support to his hospital from NIH, DeNovo Pharma, Infuseon, Therapeutics, Oncosynergy; and honoraria from Servier Pharma, and Biodexa Pharma. PYW: has received research support from Astra Zeneca, Black Diamond, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Chimerix, Eli Lily, Erasca, Global Coalition For Adaptive Research, Kazia, MediciNova, Merck, Novartis, Quadriga, Servier, and VBI Vaccines and honoraria for consultation and advisory board participation from Anheart, Astra Zeneca, Black Diamond, Celularity, Chimerix, Day One Bio, Genenta, Glaxo Smith Kline, Kintara, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novocure, Prelude Therapeutics, Sagimet, Sapience, Servier, Symbio, Tango, Telix, VBI Vaccines. NLA: has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Novartis, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Telix Pharmaceuticals, OncLive, Medsir and Servier, and research funding from Novocure and Telix Pharmaceuticals. MP: has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape. IL: has received honoraria for lectures and consultations from Telix Pharmaceuticals and Ribocure., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Gliomas are the most common brain tumor type in children and adolescents. To date, diagnosis and therapy monitoring for these tumors rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathological as well as molecular analyses of tumor tissue. Recently, liquid biopsies (LB) have emerged as promising tool for diagnosis and longitudinal tumor assessment potentially allowing for a more precise therapeutic management. However, the optimal strategy for monitoring gliomas by LB remains to be determined. In this study, we analyzed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from 78 liquid biopsies (plasma n = 44, cerebrospinal fluid n = 34 (CSF)) of 35 glioma patients, determining H3F3A K28M (K27M) and BRAF V600E mutation allele frequency using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). All results were correlated to clinically relevant parameters including diagnostic imaging and CSF aspiration site (ventricular vs lumbar) with respect to tumor localization. Regarding diagnostic accuracy, the calculated sensitivity score in the H3F3A K27M cohort was 84.61% for CSF and 73.68% for plasma. In the BRAF V600E cohort, we determined a sensitivity of 83.3% in plasma and 80% in CSF. The overall specificity was 100%. With respect to the CSF aspiration, the intra-operatively obtained CSF demonstrated 100% detection rate, followed by ventricular CSF obtained via Ommaya Reservoir/shunt puncture (93%) and CSF obtained via lumbar puncture (66%). Notably, this further correlated with the proximity of the CSF site to tumor localization. Longitudinal CSF monitoring demonstrated a good correlation to clinical and radiological disease evolution. Importantly, we show for the first time that monitoring BRAF V600E by ddPCR could serve as treatment response assessment in gliomas. In summary, our observation may inform recommendations with regard to location of CSF aspiration when incorporating LB into future treatment protocols., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: MP has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp and Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape, OncLive. All the other authors declare no conflicts of interests. JG has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Novartis, Roche. A.A. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Novartis, Alexion. All the other authors declare no conflicts of interests. Ethical approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1244/2016)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials is essential to ensure that therapeutic advances are equitable and broadly applicable in multicultural societies. Yet, missing consensus on the documentation of ethnic origin, partially based on the complexity of the terminology and fear of discrimination, leads to suboptimal patient management of minority populations. Additionally, eligibility criteria, such as stringent laboratory cut-offs, often fail to account for variations across ethnic groups, potentially excluding patients without evidence-based justification., Patients and Methods: This analysis addresses this issue by investigating ethnic diversity in clinical trials that led to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals between 2020 and 2022. Trials were identified from FDA and EMA databases, and available protocols and full-text publications were reviewed for documentation of ethnic background and eligibility criteria for organ function (bone marrow, liver, and renal). Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the findings., Results: Of the 56 trials analyzed, only two-thirds of primary result publications included information on ethnic origin. Caucasian and Asian groups were documented in most of those trials and also had the highest percentages of participants across trials, while other ethnic subgroups were less frequently documented and only made up a small proportion of trial participants. Eligibility criteria often set strict organ function cut-offs that did not consider variations among ethnic groups, potentially excluding minorities. The Cockcroft-Gault formula was frequently used to assess kidney function, despite its known limitations for multiethnic cohorts., Conclusions: Ethnic homogenous participants and eligibility criteria that favor majority groups limit the applicability of findings in diverse populations, leading to inadequate patient management. While United States guidelines encourage inclusivity, similar recommendations are lacking in Europe. Thus European regulatory authorities, research organizations, and patient advocates should establish guidelines to improve ethnic diversity in cancer clinical trials, aligning research practices with the increasingly multicultural composition of European societies., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer, increasing morbidity and mortality. Systemic therapy for BMs can be effective, with the triple combination of trastuzumab, capecitabine, and tucatinib being a potential standard. More recently, intracranial activity of antibody-drug conjugates has been reported, but the size of individual studies has been small. Therefore, this patient-level pooled analysis was conducted., Patients and Methods: This is a patient-level pooled analysis of the prospective phase II DEBBRAH and TUXEDO-1 trials and the retrospective DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort. Patients with evaluable active BMs (defined as newly diagnosed and untreated or progressing with measurable tumor-related size after previous local therapy) from HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) included in these studies were eligible. The primary endpoint was intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-BM criteria., Results: Overall, 37 patients were assessable for intracranial response assessment. BMs progressing after prior local therapy were present in 64.9% of patients. The median patient age was 49.1 years. All patients had received prior trastuzumab and the median number of prior systemic treatment lines was 3 (0-13). The pooled ORR-IC by RANO-BM criteria was 64.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.5% to 79.8%] with low heterogeneity observed between the studies included. The clinical benefit rate by RANO-BM was 81.1% (95% CI 64.8% to 92.0%). The median progression-free survival was 13.3 months (95% CI 8.4-22.6 months) and the median overall survival was 22.5 months (95% CI 14.9 months-not achieved) with high heterogeneity between studies and numerically longer in patients with few prior treatment lines. Quality of life remained stable throughout treatment, with no new safety concerns., Conclusions: This patient-level pooled analysis of DEBBRAH, TUXEDO-1, and the DFCI/Duke/MDACC cohort indicates clinically relevant intracranial activity of T-DXd in patients with active HER2-positive BC, BMs, and extensive systemic pretreatment. The results therefore support the use of T-DXd when clinically indicated irrespective of BMs., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in young adults. This condition imposes a substantial burden on patients and their caregivers, marked by neurocognitive deficits and high mortality rates due to tumor progression, coupled with significant morbidity from current treatment modalities. Although surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy improve survival, these treatments can adversely affect cognitive function, quality of life, finances, employment status, and overall independence. Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative strategies that delay progression and the use of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The recent Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval of vorasidenib, a brain-penetrant small molecule targeting mutant IDH1/2 proteins, heralds a shift in the therapeutic landscape for IDH-mutant gliomas. In this review, we address the role of vorasidenib in the treatment of IDH-mutant gliomas, providing a roadmap for its incorporation into daily practice. We discuss ongoing clinical trials with vorasidenib and other IDH inhibitors, as single-agent or in combination with other therapies, as well as current challenges and future directions., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The Brain Tumor Group (BTG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conducts academic clinical trials and translational research to improve clinical management of patients with primary and secondary brain tumors. The EORTC BTG has traditionally played an important role in providing evidence and thus advancing the field, albeit with a main focus on radiotherapy and pharmacotherapy in gliomas. Although examples of well-designed neuro-oncological surgical trials can be found, evidence in surgical neuro-oncology predominantly includes data from uncontrolled prospective series or retrospective cohorts. By means of a thorough literature and EORTC database review, we demonstrate, firstly, that while the pathway of the neuro-oncology patient most often starts with neurosurgery, its several aspects have traditionally been poorly acknowledged in clinical trials in neuro-oncology. We also show that the definitions and methods of assessment vary greatly between studies, limiting generalizability. The newly established Neurosurgery Committee of the EORTC BTG aims to address this gap by increasing the number of prospective surgical trials, but also the involvement of neurosurgeons in clinical trial design, promoting standardized terminology for description of the surgical aspects, including extent of resection. We will also explore alternative trial designs when randomization is deemed difficult, as well as focus on defining surgical quality indicators that influence outcome. By addressing these challenges, the committee aims to enhance the quality of neurosurgical evidence in neuro-oncology and define optimal surgical methods and standards of care. This should ultimately improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with brain tumors through evidence-based surgical interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PK, MB, JG, GP, AJ, RG, RG, MJ, GW, MN, TP, CQ, TG, GM report no COI JD is editorial board member of Neuro-Oncology practice and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. TP is member of the editorial board of Neurosurgical Review (advisory board) and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. MB is in the editorial board of Acta Neurochirurgica and Brain and Spine and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. MJ is editorial board member of Neuro-Oncology and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. GM is an Editorial Board Member of Neuro-Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology; Associate Editor of Neuro-Oncology Practice, Neuro-oncology Advance and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. MP is executive editor of Neuro-Oncology and was not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. JD has received honoraria for advisory board participation from Miltenyi, Servier E.L.R. has received research grants from Bristol Meyers Squibb (BMS), and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Biodexa / Sitoxi, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and Servier. MP has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape, OncLive. MW has received research grants from Novartis, Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Anheart, Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Neurosense, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Pfizer, Philogen, Roche and Servier., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grades 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after the exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside this, integrated molecular imaging allows for a noninvasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of "theranostics" has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of "theranostic" treatment approaches., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Theranostics is a new treatment modality integrating molecular imaging with targeted radionuclide therapy. Theranostic agents have received regulatory approval for some systemic cancers and have therapeutic potential in neuro-oncology. As clinical trials are developed to evaluate the efficacy of theranostic agents in brain tumors, specific considerations will have to be considered, taking into account lessons learned from previous studies examining other treatment modalities in neuro-oncology. These include the need for molecular imaging or surgical window-of-opportunity studies to confirm adequate passage across the blood-brain barrier, optimize eligibility criteria, and selection of the most appropriate response criteria and endpoints to address issues such as pseudoprogression. This review will discuss some of the issues that should be considered when designing clinical trials for theranostic agents., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Targeted radionuclide therapy is an emerging therapeutic concept for metastatic cancer that can be considered if a tumor can be delineated by nuclear medicine imaging and also targeted based on the expression of a particular target (thera-nostics). This mode of treatment can also compete with or supplement conventional radiotherapy, for example, if MRI does not fully capture the extent of the disease, including microscopic metastases. Targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with thyroid cancer, with certain somatostatin receptor 2-expressing tumors and with prostate-specific membrane antigen-expressing prostate cancer is approved, and numerous approaches of targeted radionuclide therapy for patients with metastatic cancer are in development (eg, using fibroblast activation protein as a target). Although brain metastases are rare in cancers with approved targeted radionuclide therapies, there is no a priori reason to assume that such treatments would not be effective against brain metastases if the targets are expressed and not shielded by the blood-brain barrier. Here, we discuss the current state of the art and opportunities of targeted radionuclide therapies for patients with brain and leptomeningeal metastases., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

According to the new WHO classification of 2021, gliomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors with very different histology, molecular genetics, and prognoses. In addition to glioblastomas, the most common gliomas, there are also numerous less common gliomas, some of which have a very favorable prognosis. Targeted radionuclide therapy is a therapeutic option that can be attractive if a tumor can be targeted based on its molecular characteristics. It is particularly useful when tumors cannot be completely resected or when conventional imaging does not fully capture the extent of the tumor. Numerous approaches to radionuclide therapy for gliomas are in early development. The most advanced approaches for patients with gliomas in the clinic employ L-type amino acid transporter 1 as an uptake mechanism for radiolabeled amino acids or target somatostatin receptor 2 or gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. Here, we discuss the various target structures of radionuclide therapy in gliomas and provide an outlook for which glioma entities radionuclide therapy could most likely provide a therapeutic alternative., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Brain metastases (BM) are a devastating complication of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) and treatment strategies providing optimized local and systemic disease control are urgently required. The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over trastuzumab emtansine but data regarding intracranial activity is limited. In the primary outcome analysis of TUXEDO-1, a high intracranial response rate (RR) was reported with T-DXd. Here, we report the final PFS and OS results., Patients and Methods: TUXEDO-1 accrued adult patients with HER2-positive BC and active BM (newly diagnosed or progressing) without indication for immediate local therapy. The primary endpoint was intracranial RR; secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, safety, quality-of-life (QoL), and neurocognitive function. PFS and OS were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed in the per-protocol population., Results: At 26.5 months median follow-up, median PFS was 21 months (95% CI: 13.3-n.r.) and median OS was not reached (95% CI: 22.2-n.r.). With longer follow-ups, no new safety signals were observed. The most common grade 3 adverse event was fatigue (20%). Grade 2 interstitial lung disease and a grade 3 symptomatic drop of left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed in one patient each. QoL was maintained over the treatment period., Conclusions: T-DXd yielded prolonged intra- and extracranial disease control in patients with active HER2-positive BC BM in line with results from the pivotal trials. These results support the concept of antibody-drug-conjugates as systemic therapy for active BM., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumours in adults. Despite decades of research into novel therapeutic approaches, the prognosis remains poor. PARP1-2 are critical for DNA repair, cell survival and genomic stability and PARP inhibition (PARPi) may be a promising therapeutic approach for gliomas. Inhibition of PARP activity leads to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), which, in combination with DNA damage, results in cell death. This review summarises the current knowledge and future perspectives of PARPi in glioma. The available literature was reviewed using PubMed, recent major international oncology congresses were consulted, and ongoing clinical trials were searched using ClinicalTrials.gov. In translational research, PARPi have demonstrated a strong scientific rationale for their use in the treatment of glioma. They have been evaluated both alone and in combination with radiotherapy, temozolomide, anti-angiogenic agents, immunotherapy and other new drugs in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma. Most studies were open-label, non-randomised, dose-escalation phase I-II trials. Early results show promising anti-tumour activity, and key challenges include identifying predictive biomarkers, elucidating synergistic effects in combination therapies, addressing the development of resistance, and managing hematological toxicity. In conclusion, early phase studies have shown promising anti-tumour activity of PARPi that should be confirmed in larger prospective and randomised trials. In addition, the development of novel PARPi with improved blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration and PARP inhibitor activity with new synergistic treatment combinations seems promising and needs to be further explored., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Ahmed Idbaih reports a relationship with Research grants from Carthera, Transgene, Sanofi, Air Liquide, Servier, Nutritheragene, advisory board for Leo Pharma, Novocure and Boehringer Ingelheim Int, travel funding from Novocure, Carthera and Leo Pharma. Michael Weller reports a relationship with research grants from Novartis, Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Anheart, Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Neurosense, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Pfizer, Philogen, Roche and Servier. Matteo Simonelli reports a relationship with honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi and travel funding from Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi. Giuseppe Lombardi reports a relationship with consulting or advisory role funding from ABBVIE, Bayer, Novartis, Orbus Therapeutics, BrainFarm, Celgene, CureTeq, GlaxoSmithKline, Health4U, Braun, Janssen, BioRegio Stern, Servier, Novocure, and travel funding from Roche and Bayer, Servier. Matthias Preusser has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape, OncLive., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The phase-3 INDIGO trial demonstrated that the isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) inhibitor vorasidenib significantly prolonged progression-free survival and delayed intervention in patients with CNS WHO grade 2 gliomas. However, conventional MRI showed limited response, with only 11% of patients having objective responses. Studies suggest that serial PET imaging with radiolabeled amino acids, such as O -(2-[ 18 F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, may provide earlier and more informative assessments of treatment response than MRI. In an initial experience with FET PET, 3 out of 5 patients showed metabolic response to vorasidenib. This highlights FET PET's potential to guide decision-making, though further trials are needed to confirm outcome benefits., Competing Interests: N.G. received honoraria for lectures from Blue Earth Diagnostics, for advisory board participation from Telix Pharmaceuticals and Servier, and for consultancy services from Telix Pharmaceuticals. H.C.P. received travel support from Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, and received lecture honoraria from Eli Lilly. N.L.A. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from Novartis, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Telix Pharmaceuticals, OncLive, MEDSIR, and Servier, and research funding from Novocure and Telix Pharmaceuticals. K.-J.L. received honoraria for consultancy services from Telix Pharmaceuticals. P.L. received honoraria for lectures from Blue Earth Diagnostics, and for advisory board participation from Servier. M.P. received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape, and OncLive. All other authors reported no potential conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Abstract: Hemostatic imbalances are frequent in patients with cancer. Although cancer-associated thrombotic complications have been well characterized, data on bleeding events in patients with cancer are sparse. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and impact on prognosis of bleeding events in patients with cancer initiating systemic anticancer therapies in a prospective cohort study, the Vienna Cancer, Thrombosis, and Bleeding Study. The primary study outcome was defined as clinically relevant bleeding (CRB), comprising major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. In total, 791 patients (48% female), with median age of 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-70), with various cancer types, 65.5% stage IV, were included. Over a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR, 8.7-24.0), we observed 194 CRB events in 139 (17.6%) patients, of which 42 (30.0%) were tumor related, 64 (46.0%) gastrointestinal, and 7 (5.0%) intracerebral. The 12-month cumulative incidence of first CRB and MB was 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.7-19.6) and 9.1% (95% CI, 6.8-11.3), respectively, in the whole cohort, and 14.4% (95% CI, 11.2-17.5) and 7.0% (95% CI, 4.7-9.2), respectively, in those without anticoagulation. Patients with head and neck cancer had the highest risk of CRB. Lower baseline hemoglobin and albumin were associated with bleeding in patients without anticoagulation. Seven (5.0%) bleeding events were fatal, of which 6 occurred in patients without anticoagulation. Patients with CRB were at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (multivariable transition hazard ratio, 5.80; 95% CI, 4.53-7.43). In patients with cancer, bleeding events represent a frequent complication and are associated with increased mortality., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors of adults. For meningiomas that progress or recur despite surgical resection and radiotherapy, additional treatment options are limited due to lack of proven efficacy. Meningiomas show recurring molecular aberrations, which may serve as predictive markers for systemic pharmacotherapies with targeted drugs or immunotherapy, radiotherapy or radioligand therapy. Here, we review the evidence for a predictive role of a wide range of molecular alterations and markers including NF2, AKT1, SMO, SMARCE1, PIK3CA, CDKN2A/B, CDK4/6, TERT, TRAF7, BAP1, KLF4, ARID1/2, SUFU, PD-L1, SSTR2A, PR/ER, mTOR, VEGFR, PDGFR, as well as homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), genomic copy number variations, DNA methylation classes and combined gene expression profiles. In our assessment based on the established ESMO ESCAT (European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets) evidence level criteria, no molecular target reached ESCAT I ("ready for clinical use") classification and only mTOR pathway activation and NF2 alterations reached ESCAT II ("investigational") classification, respectively. Our evaluations may guide targeted therapy selection in clinical practice and clinical trial efforts and highlight areas for which additional research is warranted., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

The clinical efficacy of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in the treatment of patients with grade 2 IDH-mutant (mIDH) gliomas is a significant therapeutic advancement in neuro-oncology. It expands treatment options beyond traditional radiation therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, which may lead to significant long-term neurotoxic effects while extending patient survival. The INDIGO study demonstrated that vorasidenib, a pan-mIDH inhibitor, improved progression-free survival for patients with grade 2 mIDH gliomas following surgical resection or biopsy compared to placebo and was well tolerated. However, these encouraging results leave a wake of unanswered questions: Will higher-grade mIDH glioma patients benefit? When is the appropriate timing to start and stop treatment? Where does this new treatment option fit in with other treatment modalities? In this study, we review the limited data available to start addressing these questions, provide a framework of how to discuss these gaps with current patients, and highlight what is needed from the neuro-oncology community for more definitive answers., Competing Interests: A.D. has received honoraria for advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Novocure and Servier Pharmaceuticals. M.P. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation, or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group, CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, and Medscape. S.L.H.-J. has no interest to disclose. H.A.S. received compensation from UpToDate (writer and section editor), MedLink Neurology (writer), Servier Pharmaceuticals (advisory board), and AbbVie (institutional research support). E.M. has no interest to disclose. J.W.T. has received research support from Servier Pharmaceuticals and Bristol-Myers Squibb and compensation from Servier Pharmaceuticals for advisory board participation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumours in adults. Several studies proposed new stratification systems with a more accurate risk prediction than the WHO grading, e.g. based on methylation and copy number variations (CNVs). Yet, common shortcomings in these analyses are either a lack of stratification by sex of patients or excluding the gonososmes from CNV assessment., Methods: Within this study, DNA methylation array data from 7,424 meningioma samples as well as targeted sequencing, clinical annotations and morphology subtyping of 796 samples were examined for differences between females and males regarding mutations, methylation classes, copy number variations and histology., Results: Meningiomas from females accounted for about 53 % of the malignant tumours and present a loss of one X chromosome in 57 % of these malignant cases. In the group of benign tumours, females comprised about 75 % of the patients. Therein, a loss of one X chromosome was detected in only about 10 % of the cases but was associated with a significantly worse progression free survival., Conclusion: Although genomic instability is a common feature of malignant meningiomas, particularly loss of the X chromosome in tumours of female patients in otherwise histologically and molecularly low-risk tumours confers higher risk. Hence, the gonosomal copy number status can be leveraged for increased diagnostic accuracy., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Patients with cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a substantial risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The association between ICI-induced inflammation and hypercoagulability is unclear, and no biomarkers currently exist to stratify VTE risk., Objectives: The authors sought to determine the association between the early changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) after ICI initiation and the risk of VTE., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer initiating ICI therapy from 2 academic cancer centers, serving as discovery and external validation cohorts. Patients were stratified based on CRP trajectories during the first 3 months of ICI treatment, with a CRP rise defined as a 2-fold increase from baseline. Patients were followed for VTE for the duration of ICI therapy, and competing risk and time-dependent analyses were used., Results: A total of 822 patients were included. In the discovery cohort (n = 405), the cumulative VTE incidence in patients with a CRP rise (n = 159, 39.3%) was 19.9% (95% CI: 8.4%-34.8%), compared with 8.6% (3.1%-17.6%) in those without a CRP rise. After adjusting for key patient- and cancer-specific confounders, the subdistribution HR for VTE in patients with a CRP rise was 2.64 (95% CI: 1.06-6.62). This was confirmed in the external validation cohort (n = 417; subdistribution HR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.03-4.94), with VTE incidences of 22.9% (95% CI: 9.7%-39.3%) in patients with a CRP rise and 10.8% (95% CI: 7.4%-15.1%) in those without. The association between CRP rise and VTE risk was confirmed in a time-dependent analysis and was consistent after adjusting for disease progression as a potential time-dependent confounder., Conclusions: Early CRP changes during ICI therapy are associated with an increased risk of VTE, suggesting a potential association between ICI-induced inflammation and hypercoagulability. CRP trajectories may serve as a biomarker for ICI-associated VTE., Competing Interests: This project was supported by the Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (Gesellschaft für Thrombose- und Hämostaseforschung, GTH) Early Career Research Grant 2021. The AUTRICHE-registry was supported by a research grant from AstraZeneca GmbH, Bristol-Myers Squibb GesmbH (BMS) and Roche Austria. The funding body had no role in the design, analysis, and publication of this study. Dr Moik has received travel/congress support from Novartis; and honoraria for lectures from Servier and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Riedl has received honoraria for lectures from BMS and MSD. Dr Barth has received travel/congress support from EISAI, Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, and MSD; honoraria for consulting or advisory boards from Roche, EISAI, and MSD; and honoraria for lectures from Ipsen unrelated to the submitted work. Dr Hoeller has received speaker honoraria from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; and participated on advisory boards for Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Inzyte, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Roche. Dr Fuereder has received honoraria from MSD, Merck Darmstadt, Roche, BMS, Accord, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and participated on advisory boards for MSD, Merck Darmstadt, Amgen, Pfizer, and Sanofi. Dr L. Ay has received personal fees for lectures and participation on advisory boards from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Roche, Sandoz, and Astra Zeneca. Dr Pabinger has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board meetings from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and BMS/ Pfizer. Dr Richtig has received honoraria from Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, Merck Sharp Dohme, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi; has had a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; has served on the speakers bureau for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi; and has received institutional research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Delcath, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Curevac. Dr Jost has had a consulting or advisory role, and received honoraria, research funding, and/or travel/accommodation expenses, from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Roche, BMS and Celgene, Pierre Fabre, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Merck, Sanofi/Aventis, Ipsen, and Amgen. Dr Gerger has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board participation from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, and AstraZeneca. Dr Terbuch has received honoraria for lectures and advisory board participation from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, and AstraZeneca. Dr Preusser has received honoraria for lectures, consultation, or advisory board participation from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Bohringer Ingelheim, Telix, and Medscape. Dr C. Ay has received personal fees for lectures and/or participation in advisory boards from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS/Pfizer Alliance, and Sanofi. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Radiation therapy, including conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy, is a cornerstone in the interdisciplinary management of meningiomas. Recent advances in radiation oncology and also in other fields, such as neuropathology and imaging, have various implications for meningioma radiation therapy. This review aims to summarize current and anticipated developments, as well as active clinical trials related to the use of radiation therapy for meningiomas. In imaging, positron emission tomography has proven valuable for assessing the spatial extension of meningiomas and may enhance target delineation, treatment response monitoring, and recurrence assessment after radiation therapy. Particle therapy, including protons and carbon ions, as well as stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy, allow for conformal treatments that permit dose escalation in selected patients with high-grade meningiomas. Additionally, emerging integrated molecular and genetic classifications offer superior risk stratification and may refine patient selection for radiation therapy. However, there is a paucity of active meningioma trials directly investigating or refining the use of radiation therapy. In summary, significant advances in functional imaging, molecular and genetic diagnostics, and radiation treatment techniques hold the potential to improve patient outcomes and to avoid over- and undertreatment. Collaborative efforts and further clinical trials are essential to optimize meningioma radiation therapy., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cancer represents the leading cause of mortality in high-income countries. In the last years, the rate of emergency department (ED) visits by cancer patients has increased 5.5-fold. These ED visits impose a significant economic burden and may indicate the progression of the oncologic disease. The goal of this retrospective study was to identify patient-derived risk factors, especially focusing on serum albumin and body mass index (BMI) for 90-day mortality following unplanned ED visits by cancer patients., Methods: A retrospective chart review of all patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis for cancer undergoing palliative treatment presenting at the ED between 2016 and 2018 at the General Hospital of Vienna was performed. Laboratory values, emergency severity index (ESI), and BMI were collected at the ED presentation. 90-day mortality (90MM) was calculated from the ED presentation., Results: A total of 448 cancer patients were included. Lung cancer (19.2%) and pancreaticobiliary cancer (15.6%) were the most frequent diagnoses. The main reasons for ED visits were pain (20.5%) and fever (17.4%). Sixty-nine percent of patients had to be admitted and 17.5% of patients died during hospitalization. 90MM was highest for patients with low albumin (< 35 g/L vs. > 35 g/L: 60.4% vs. 31.4%; p < .0001). When incorporating albumin levels and BMI, patients with both values below the cutoff had the highest risk for death (HR 4.01, 95% CI 2.30-7.02)., Conclusion: Cancer patients face a high risk for hospitalization when presenting at the ED. The 90MM rate is highest in patients with low BMI and albumin levels. This highlights an especially vulnerable cohort of cancer patients for whom supportive care and palliative care have to be optimized., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The standard of care for adult patients with gliomas, glioneuronal and neuronal tumors consists of combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. For many systemic cancers, targeted treatments are a major part of the standard treatment, however, the predictive significance of most of the targets for treatment in systemic cancer are less well established in central nervous system (CNS) tumors . In 2023 the EANO Guideline Committee presented evidence based recommendations for rational testing of molecular targets for targeted treatments. From all targets reviewed, only testing for BRAF V600E mutations was of proven clinical benefit; despite regulatory approvals for tumor agnostic treatment of NTRK gene fusions and high Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) for patients with adult brain tumors, the evidence of clinical benefit for patients was still limited . This guideline has a modular structure, allowing regular updating of individual sections and adding new ones. The present version (Update 1) presents a review of the rationale of testing for PTEN, H3F3A, MTAP, RET and IDH, and presents an update of the text on TMB high and mismatch repair deficiency. It also presents an overview of therapeutic yield of routine next generation sequencing for mutations and fusion detection. The supplement accompanying this version contains the in depth review of all targets, whereas in the main manuscript the final recommendations of the revised and new targets are presented. Updates will be made on a regular basis., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The 2016 and 2021 World Health Organization 2021 Classification of central nervous system tumors have resulted in a major improvement in the classification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant gliomas. With more effective treatments many patients experience prolonged survival. However, treatment guidelines are often still based on information from historical series comprising both patients with IDH wild-type and IDH-mutant tumors. They provide recommendations for radiotherapy and chemotherapy for so-called high-risk patients, usually based on residual tumor after surgery and age over 40. More up-to-date studies give a better insight into clinical, radiological, and molecular factors associated with the outcome of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. These insights should be used today for risk stratification and for treatment decisions. In many patients with IDH-mutant grades 2 and 3 glioma, if carefully monitored postponing radiotherapy and chemotherapy is safe, and will not jeopardize the overall outcome of patients. With the INDIGO trial showing patient benefit from the IDH inhibitor vorasidenib, there is a sizable population in which it seems reasonable to try this class of agents before recommending radio-chemotherapy with its delayed adverse event profile affecting quality of survival. Ongoing trials should help to further identify the patients that are benefiting from this treatment., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults and are increasing in incidence due to the aging population and increased access to neuroimaging. While most exhibit nonmalignant behavior, a subset of meningiomas are biologically aggressive and are associated with treatment resistance, resulting in significant neurologic morbidity and even mortality. In recent years, meaningful advances in our understanding of the biology of these tumors have led to the incorporation of molecular biomarkers into their grading and prognostication. However, unlike other central nervous system (CNS) tumors, a unified molecular taxonomy for meningiomas has not yet been established and remains an overarching goal of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy-Not Official World Health Organization (cIMPACT-NOW) working group. Additionally, clinical equipoise still remains on how specific meningioma cases and patient populations should be optimally managed. To address these existing gaps, members of the International Consortium on Meningiomas including field-leading experts, have prepared this comprehensive consensus narrative review directed toward clinicians, researchers, and patients. Included in this manuscript are detailed overviews of proposed molecular classifications, novel biomarkers, contemporary treatment strategies, trials on systemic therapies, health-related quality-of-life studies, and management strategies for unique meningioma patient populations. In each section, we discuss the current state of knowledge as well as ongoing clinical and research challenges to road map future directions for further investigation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Purpose: To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands., Methods: This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO)., Results: Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma., Conclusion: These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: There is no consensus on how to estimate kidney function for the assessment of eligibility in clinical cancer trials., Patients and Methods: We recalculated the creatinine clearance (CrCl)/glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline in a total of 1768 patients enrolled in twelve clinical trials using the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI 2021) and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) formulas. Patients were classified as having renal impairment (RI; CrCl/GFR <60 mL/min) or no renal impairment (NRI; CrCl/GFR ≥60 mL/min) with each of the four formulas, respectively. Furthermore, we analyzed the number of adverse events (AE) per month under study treatment using measures of central tendency, variability and regression models., Results: Using CG, EKFC, MDRD and CKD-EPI 2021, 152 (8 %), 140 (8 %), 110 (6 %), and 61 (4 %) patients had RI respectively. Indeed, 47 (3 %) patients had RI using all 4 formulas, while 158 (9 %) had RI by at least one but not all four methods. CG showed the broadest variability and inconsistencies with other methods. All calculation methods performed similarly for excluding patients at risk of severe AE. EKFC demonstrated superior predictive ability for excluding patients at risk of renal and urinary tract AE., Conclusion: This post hoc analysis highlights the importance of choosing accurate and representative methods for kidney function estimation in clinical cancer trials. CG should be replaced by newer methods. While CKD-EPI 2021 may maximize trial accrual, EKFC should be considered for treatment affecting kidney function., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest HCP has received travel support from Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Roche and received lecture honoraria from Eli Lilly. MP has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, Medscape., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Patients with brain tumours are motivated to participate in clinical trials involving repeat tissue sampling. Normalising the use of neoadjuvant and staged surgical trials necessitates collaboration among patients, regulatory agencies, and researchers. Initial and repetitive tissue sampling plays a crucial role in enhancing our understanding of resistance mechanisms and vulnerabilities in brain tumour therapy. Standardising biopsy techniques and ensuring technical uniformity across institutions are vital for effective interinstitutional collaboration. Although liquid biopsy technologies hold promise, they are not yet ready to replace tissue analysis. Clear communication about the risks and benefits of biopsies is essential, particularly regarding potential postoperative deficits. Changes in mindset and neurosurgical culture are imperative to achieve much needed breakthroughs in the development of new, effective therapies for brain tumours., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MG declares research grant support from Evgen Pharm. KCS declares honoraria from Springworks Therapeutics and Novartis; declares research funding to her institution from Springworks Therapeutics; and serves on a data and safety monitoring board for Advarra. TFC is cofounder, major stock holder, consultant, and board member of Katmai Pharmaceuticals; holds stock for Erasca; is a member of the board and paid consultant for the 501c3 Global Coalition for Adaptive Research; holds stock in Chimerix and receives milestone payments and possible future royalties; is a member of the scientific advisory board for Break Through Cancer foundation and Cure Brain Cancer Foundation; has provided paid consulting services to Symbio, Mundipharma, Tango BlueRock, Vida Ventures, Lista Therapeutics, Stemline, Novartis, Roche, Sonalasense, Sagimet, Clinical Care Options, Ideology Health, Servier, Jubilant, Immvira, Gan & Lee, BrainStorm, Katmai, Sapience, Inovio, Vigeo Therapeutics, DNATrix, Tyme, SDP, Kintara, Bayer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, VBL, Amgen, Kiyatec, AbbVie, VBI, Deciphera, Agios, Novocure, and Medscape; and has contracts with UCLA for the Brain Tumour Programme with Roche, VBI, Merck, Novartis, and Bristol Myers Squibb. The Regents of the University of California, TFC's employer, has licensed intellectual property co-invented by TFC to Katmai Pharmaceuticals. GL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics, IOBiotech, Immunocore, Innovent Biologics USA, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, PHMR, Pierre Fabre, and Regeneron. AC declares research funding and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Benevolent AI, Duke Street Bio, and Evgen Pharmaceuticals; and has received honoraria from Storm Therapeutics. MSA declares a grant from Seagen; declares consulting fees from Bayer, Kiyatec, Insightec, GSK, Xoft, Nuvation, SDP Oncology, Apollomics, Prelude, Janssen, Voyager Therapeutics, Viewray, Caris Lifesciences, Pyramid Biosciences, Varian Medical Systems, Cairn Therapeutics, Anheart Therapeutics, Theraguix, Menarini Ricerche, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Autem Therapeutics, GT Medical Technologies, Allovir, and Equillium Bio; is on the data and safety monitoring board for VBI Vaccines; is on the scientific advisory board of Modifi biosciences and Bugworks; and is a shareholder for Mimivax, Cytodyn, MedInnovate Advisors, and Trisalus Lifesciences. SB reports consulting fees from and is a member of the advisory boards of Telix, Servier, Bayer, and Novocure; and research grants from Incyte, GSK, Lilly, Kite, and Novocure. JdG reports being an advisory board member for Kintara Pharmaceuticals, Kazia, MundiPharma, Insightec, Monteris, Carthera, Samus, Sapience, DSP Pharma, Telix, Servier, Alpha Pharmaceuticals, Nervianos, and CapitalOne; is a data safety monitoring board member for Chimerix and VBI; and has consulted for MundiPharma, Insightec, Carthera, Kintara, Deciphera, Kazia, and Nervianos. IP reports research funding from Merck. TCB reports consulting roles for Predicine; has received financial support from AbbVie and Predicine, with consulting fees paid to Mayo Clinic; and has been a member of the advisory board for Neurametrix. MPr reports honoraria from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group, CMC Contrast, GSK, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Telix, and Medscape. JCT reports research grants from Novocure and Munich Surgical Imaging; being on the advisory board of Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novartis; and Servier; and has received royalties from Springer Publishing. MPl reports being a founder of Tcelltech; has received research support from Bayer, Roche, Pfizer, and Merck; and is an advisory board member of Bayer and Servier. SD is speaker for the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons; receives research funding from Alkermes; is a member of the Subcortical Surgery Group advisory board; has received royalties from Oxford University Press; and is provincial lead for CNS Oncology at Ontario Health. KT reports consulting fees from Oncohereos Biosciences; and advisory board roles for Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novartis; Sage Therapeutics; FYR Diagnostics; Cordance Medical; Telo Therapeutics; and Modifi Bio. MAV reports clinical trial funding to their institution from DeNovo Pharma, Infuseon, and Oncosynergy; and received honoraria fees from Biodexa and Servier Pharma. MW reports research grants from Novartis, Quercis, and Versameb; honoraria for advisory boards from Roche and Servier; and honoraria for consultation from Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Neurosense, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Philogen, and Servier. JRW reports research funding from AnHeart Therapeutics to their institution; received consulting fees from AnHeart Therapeutics and Servier; being on advisory boards for Roche and Merck; is a data safety monitoring member for Telix Pharmaceuticals; and is an employee of The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and could be eligible for milestone and royalty payments related to Venetoclax. MK reports research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, BioNTech, CNS Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Immorna Therapeutics, Immvira Therapeutics, and Personalis; received consulting fees from The Jackson Lab for Genomic Research, AnHeart Therapeutics, Berg Pharma, George Clinical, Manarini Stemline, and Servier; received honoraria from GSK; and is on a data safety monitoring board for BPGbio. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier., Methods: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1709/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving the only standard treatment in the whole population and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors., Results: The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada, and the U.S. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of the planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs. 16.5 months; HR = 1.04; P = .64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR = 0.97; P = .67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs. 15.1 months, HR = 1.13; P = .27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm., Conclusions: Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Introduction: The role of the family history in the development and prognosis of gastroesophageal cancer is a controversially discussed topic as appropriate data from western cohorts are lacking. This study aims to explore its associations with disease and outcome parameters in a large European cohort., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed self-reported family history in patients with gastroesophageal cancer treated between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2021 at the Medical University of Vienna. Association analyses with patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, symptoms and overall survival (OS) were performed., Results: In our cohort of 1762 gastroesophageal cancer patients, 592 (34%) reported a positive family history of cancer (159, 9%, gastroesophageal cancer). No associations were found with histopathological parameters or initial symptoms; however, a positive family history correlated with female gender (cancer in general: p = 0.011; gastroesophageal cancer: p = 0.015). Family history of cancer in general was associated with earlier cancer stages (p = 0.04), higher BMI (p = 0.005), and alcohol consumption (p = 0.010), while a positive history for gastroesophageal cancer was associated with higher age at diagnosis (p = 0.002) and stomach cancer (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant association of positive family history with OS (p = 0.1, p = 0.45), also not in subgroups for histology (adeno and squamous cell), number of family members and degree of relative., Conclusion: Our results emphasize that a positive family history is neither statistically significantly associated with prognosis nor with specific histopathological features in patients with gastroesophageal cancer. Yet, associations with distinct patient characteristics and positive family history indicate that specific subgroups might profit from endoscopic surveillance. Prospective studies are warranted to investigate these findings further., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Theranostics integrate molecular imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy for personalised cancer therapy. Theranostic treatments have shown meaningful efficacy in randomised clinical trials and are approved for clinical use in prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumours. Brain tumours represent an unmet clinical need and theranostics might offer effective treatment options, although specific issues need to be considered for clinical development. In this Policy Review, we discuss opportunities and challenges of developing targeted radionuclide therapies for the treatment of brain tumours including glioma, meningioma, and brain metastasis. The rational choice of molecular treatment targets is highlighted, including the potential relevance of different types of targeted radionuclide therapeutics, and the role of the blood-brain barrier and blood-tumour barrier. Furthermore, we discuss considerations for effective clinical trial design and conduct, as well as logistical and regulatory challenges for implementation of radionuclide therapies into neuro-oncological practice. Rational development will foster successful translation of the theranostic concept to brain tumours., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NLA has received honoraria for consultation or advisory board participation from Novartis, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Servier, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; and has received research funding from Novocure. ELR has received a research grant from Bristol Myers Squibb; and received honoraria for advisory board participation from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seagen, and Servier. GM has received honoraria for speaker activity and travel support from Brainlab and Accuray. MJM has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and travel support from Pierre Fabre. NG received honoraria for lectures from Blue Earth Diagnostics and for advisory board participation from Telix Pharmaceuticals. MN has received speaker fees for educational lectures from AstraZeneca and Brainlab. MS has received consultancy fees from Bracco and speaker fees from AuntMinnie and Fondazione Internazionale Menarini (all paid to institution). AV has received honoraria for consultation or advisory board participation from Curium, Eisai, General Electrics, and Novartis. MW has received research grants from Quercis and Versameb; and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Neurosense, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Philogen, Roche, and Servier. MP has received honoraria for lectures, consultation, or advisory board participation from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group, CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Servier, Miltenyi, Böhringer-Ingelheim, Telix, and Medscape. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The presence of abundant tumor stroma is a prominent characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) that potentially influences disease progression and therapy response. This study aims to investigate immune cell infiltration and epigenetic profiles in tumor cell enriched ("Tumor") and stroma cell enriched ("Stroma") regions within human PDAC tissue samples. By comparing those regions, we identified 25,410 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) distributed across 6,963 unique genes. Pathway enrichment analysis using the top 2,000 DMPs that were either hyper- or hypomethylated indicated that immune response pathways and the estrogen receptor pathway are epigenetically dysregulated in Tumor and Stroma regions, respectively. In terms of immune cell infiltration, we observed overall low levels of T cells in both regions. In Tumor regions however, occurrence of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) was higher than in Stroma regions (p = 0.02) concomitant with a dualistic distribution that stratifies PDAC patients into those with high and low TAM infiltration. By categorizing TAM levels into quartiles, our analysis revealed that PDAC patients with more than 1,515 TAMs per mm² exhibited significantly shorter overall survival (p = 0.036). Our data suggest that variations in inflammatory characteristics between the Tumor and Stroma defined compartments of PDAC may primarily stem from the presence of macrophages rather than lymphocytes. The abundance of TAMs within regions enriched with tumor cells correlates with patient survival, underscoring the potential significance of exploring therapeutic interventions targeting TAMs. Furthermore, directing attention towards the estrogen receptor pathway may represent a promising strategy to address the stroma cell component within the PDAC tumor microenvironment., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest statement Anna Sophie Berghoff has research support from Daiichi Sankyo, Roche and honoraria for lectures, consultation, and advisory board participation from Roche Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, CeCaVa, and travel support from Roche, Amgen, and AbbVie. Matthias Preusser has received honoraria for lectures, consultation, and advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome, Tocagen, Adastra, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, and Servier. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are no validated tools for the clinical neurological assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). However, clinical examination during the course of the disease guides medical management and is part of response assessment in clinical trials. Because neuroimaging may not always be obtained owing to rapid clinical deterioration, clinical neurological assessment of LM is essential, and standardization Is important to minimize rater disagreement., Methods: The RANO-LM group launched a 2-steps process, aiming at improving and standardizing the clinical assessment of patients with LM. We report here on the first step: the establishment of a consensus scorecard. The task force had 9 virtual meetings to define general recommendations on neurological assessment and selected domains of interest that should be tested., Results: Fourteen domains of neurological symptoms and signs were selected: level of consciousness, cognition, nausea and vomiting, vision, eye movement, facial strength, hearing, swallowing, speech, limb strength, limb ataxia, walking, bladder bowel functions. For each item, a clear instruction on how to perform the assessment is provided with scoring criteria between 0 and 2. The general clinical status of the patient and use of steroids, pain medications, and anti-emetics should be documented. Neurological sequelae from previous brain metastases or cancer treatment should be rated at the baseline evaluation; it should be specified when symptoms or signs may be related to a condition other than LM., Discussion: A revised NANO-LM consensus scorecard for clinical assessment has been established. An international prospective validation study of the proposal is currently ongoing (NCT06417710)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Here, we present the case of a patient with a metastatic neuroendocrine tumor with cytologically negative ascites treated for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Ascitic cultures remained negative for bacterial growth but were positive for Candida albicans 8 days after SBP diagnosis. ß-D-glucan was only positive in ascites, while being negative in blood. Blood cultures remained negative throughout the whole admission. Fungal peritonitis presumably originated from an impending bowl perforation or an increasing vascular permeability caused by an increase in VEGF secondary to diffuse infiltration by the underlying malignant disease., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: We previously reported that tumor 3D volume growth rate (3DVGR) classification could help in the assessment of drug activity in patients with meningioma using 3 main classes and a total of 5 subclasses: class 1: decrease; 2: stabilization or severe slowdown; 3: progression. The EORTC-BTG-1320 clinical trial was a randomized phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of trabectedin for recurrent WHO 2 or 3 meningioma. Our objective was to evaluate the discriminative value of 3DVGR classification in the EORTC-BTG-1320., Methods: All patients with at least 1 available MRI before trial inclusion were included. 3D volume was evaluated on consecutive MRI until progression. 2D imaging response was centrally assessed by MRI modified Macdonald criteria. Clinical benefit was defined as neurological or functional status improvement or steroid decrease or discontinuation., Results: Sixteen patients with a median age of 58.5 years were included. Best 3DVGR classes were: 1, 2A, 3A, and 3B in 2 (16.7%), 4 (33.3%), 2 (16.7%), and 4 (33.3%) patients, respectively. All patients with progression-free survival longer than 6 months had best 3DVGR class 1 or 2. 3DVGR classes 1 and 2 (combined) had a median overall survival of 34.7 months versus 7.2 months for class 3 (P = .061). All class 1 patients (2/2), 75% of class 2 patients (3/4), and only 10% of class 3 patients (1/10) had clinical benefit., Conclusions: Tumor 3DVGR classification may be helpful to identify early signals of treatment activity in meningioma clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumours in adults and cannot usually be cured with standard cancer treatments. Gliomas show intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity at the histological and molecular levels, and they frequently contain mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) or IDH2 gene. IDH-mutant adult-type diffuse gliomas are subdivided into grade 2, 3 or 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas and grade 2 or 3 IDH-mutant, 1p19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas. The product of the mutated IDH genes, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), induces global DNA hypermethylation and interferes with immunity, leading to stimulation of tumour growth. Selective inhibitors of mutant IDH, such as ivosidenib and vorasidenib, have been shown to reduce D-2-HG levels and induce cellular differentiation in preclinical models and to induce MRI-detectable responses in early clinical trials. The phase III INDIGO trial has demonstrated superiority of vorasidenib, a brain-penetrant pan-mutant IDH inhibitor, over placebo in people with non-enhancing grade 2 IDH-mutant gliomas following surgery. In this Review, we describe the pathway of development of IDH inhibitors in IDH-mutant low-grade gliomas from preclinical models to clinical trials. We discuss the practice-changing implications of the INDIGO trial and consider new avenues of investigation in the field of IDH-mutant gliomas., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Chemotherapy with lomustine is widely considered as standard treatment option for progressive glioblastoma. The value of adding radiotherapy to second-line chemotherapy is not known., Methods: EORTC-2227-BTG (LEGATO, NCT05904119) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic (PRECIS-2 score: 34 out of 45), randomized, multicenter phase III trial in patients with first progression of glioblastoma. A total of 411 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to lomustine (110 mg/m 2 every 6 weeks) or lomustine (110 mg/m 2 every 6weeks) plus radiotherapy (35 Gy in 10 fractions). Main eligibility criteria include histologic confirmation of glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH) wild-type per WHO 2021 classification, first progression at least 6 months after the end of prior radiotherapy, radiologically measurable disease according to RANO criteria with a maximum tumor diameter of 5 cm, and WHO performance status of 0-2. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, response rate, neurocognitive function, health-related quality of life, and health economic parameters. LEGATO is funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe Research program, was activated in March 2024 and will enroll patients in 43 sites in 11 countries across Europe with study completion projected in 2028., Discussion: EORTC-2227-BTG (LEGATO) is a publicly funded pragmatic phase III trial designed to clarify the efficacy of adding reirradiation to chemotherapy with lomustine for the treatment of patients with first progression of glioblastoma., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05904119. Registered before start of inclusion, 23 May 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Epidemiological studies have explored the relationship between allergic diseases and cancer risk or prognosis in AllergoOncology. Some studies suggest an inverse association, but uncertainties remain, including in IgE-mediated diseases and glioma. Allergic disease stems from a Th2-biased immune response to allergens in predisposed atopic individuals. Allergic disorders vary in phenotype, genotype and endotype, affecting their pathophysiology. Beyond clinical manifestation and commonly used clinical markers, there is ongoing research to identify novel biomarkers for allergy diagnosis, monitoring, severity assessment and treatment. Gliomas, the most common and diverse brain tumours, have in parallel undergone changes in classification over time, with specific molecular biomarkers defining glioma subtypes. Gliomas exhibit a complex tumour-immune interphase and distinct immune microenvironment features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy hold promise for primary brain tumour treatment, but require more specific and effective approaches. Animal studies indicate allergic airway inflammation may delay glioma progression. This collaborative European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Position Paper summarizes recent advances and emerging biomarkers for refined allergy and adult-type diffuse glioma classification to inform future epidemiological and clinical studies. Future research is needed to enhance our understanding of immune-glioma interactions to ultimately improve patient prognosis and survival., (© 2024 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: With the application of high-resolution 3D 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging (MRSI) in high-grade gliomas, we previously identified intratumoral metabolic heterogeneities. In this study, we evaluated the potential of 3D 7 T-MRSI for the preoperative noninvasive classification of glioma grade and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status. We demonstrated that IDH mutation and glioma grade are detectable by ultra-high field (UHF) MRI. This technique might potentially optimize the perioperative management of glioma patients., Methods: We prospectively included 36 patients with WHO 2021 grade 2-4 gliomas (20 IDH mutated, 16 IDH wildtype). Our 7 T 3D MRSI sequence provided high-resolution metabolic maps (e.g., choline, creatine, glutamine, and glycine) of these patients' brains. We employed multivariate random forest and support vector machine models to voxels within a tumor segmentation, for classification of glioma grade and IDH mutation status., Results: Random forest analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 for multivariate IDH classification based on metabolic ratios. We distinguished high- and low-grade tumors by total choline (tCho) / total N-acetyl-aspartate (tNAA) ratio difference, yielding an AUC of 0.99. Tumor categorization based on other measured metabolic ratios provided comparable accuracy., Conclusions: We successfully classified IDH mutation status and high- versus low-grade gliomas preoperatively based on 7 T MRSI and clinical tumor segmentation. With this approach, we demonstrated imaging based tumor marker predictions at least as accurate as comparable studies, highlighting the potential application of MRSI for pre-operative tumor classifications., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Patients with high-grade gliomas are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with multiple roles in tumour biology, haemostasis and platelet function. Their association with VTE risk in high-grade glioma has not been comprehensively mapped so far. We thus conducted a nested case-control study within 152 patients with WHO grade IV glioma that had been part of a prospective cohort study on VTE risk factors. At inclusion a single blood draw was taken, and patients were thereafter followed for a maximum of 2 years. During that time, 24 patients (16%) developed VTE. Of the other 128 patients, we randomly selected 24 age- and sex-matched controls. After quality control, the final group size was 21 patients with VTE during follow-up and 23 without VTE. Small RNA next-generation sequencing of plasma was performed. We observed that hsa-miR-451a was globally the most abundant miRNA. Notably, 51% of all miRNAs showed a correlation with platelet count. The analysis of miRNAs differentially regulated in VTE patients-with and without platelet adjustment-identified potential VTE biomarker candidates such as has-miR-221-3p. Therewith, we here provide one of the largest and deepest peripheral blood miRNA datasets of high-grade glioma patients so far, in which we identified first VTE biomarker candidates that can serve as the starting point for future research., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)