51. Laboratory animals and respiratory allergies: The prevalence of allergies among laboratory animal workers and the need for prophylaxis
- Author
-
José Antônio Baddini Martinez, Andrea Cetlin, Edson Zangiacomi Martinez, Elcio Oliveira Vianna, Amanda S. M. de Freitas, Marcos C. Borges, Christian S. Simoneti, Ericson Bagatin, Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda, and Erica Ferraz
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Spirometry ,Allergy ,Veterinary medicine ,Cross-sectional study ,Laboratory Animal Allergy ,Bronchial Provocation Tests ,Occupational safety and health ,Animal Technicians ,Young Adult ,Risk Factors ,Animals, Laboratory ,Occupational Exposure ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Environmental health ,Respiratory Hypersensitivity ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Personal protective equipment ,Occupational Health ,Skin Tests ,Asthma ,Rhinitis ,lcsh:R5-920 ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Protective Devices ,Laboratory animal allergy ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Clinical Science ,medicine.disease ,Occupational Allergens ,Occupational Diseases ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Female ,Bronchial challenge test ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,business ,Brazil ,Animal Workers - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Subjects exposed to laboratory animals are at a heightened risk of developing respiratory and allergic diseases. These diseases can be prevented by simple measures such as the use of personal protective equipment. We report here the primary findings of the Laboratory Animals and Respiratory Allergies Study regarding the prevalence of allergic diseases among laboratory animal workers, the routine use of preventive measures in laboratories and animal facilities, and the need for prevention programs. METHODS: Animal handlers and non-animal handlers from 2 Brazilian universities (University of São Paulo and State University of Campinas) answered specific questionnaires to assess work conditions and symptoms. These subjects also underwent spirometry, a bronchial challenge test with mannitol, and skin prick tests for 11 common allergens and 5 occupational allergens (rat, mouse, guinea pig, hamster, and rabbit). RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-five animal handlers (32±10 years old [mean±SD], 209 men) and 387 non-animal handlers (33±11 years old, 121 men) were evaluated. Sensitization to occupational allergens was higher among animal handlers (16%) than non-animal handlers (3%, p
- Published
- 2013