Search

Background: Platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimens are the backbone of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However response rates to first line chemotherapy range from 30 to 50% and disease progression occurs after 4-6 cycles. The optimal duration of first-line therapy is still unknown and its continuation until disease progression represents the standard. However this strategy is often associated with cumulative toxicity and rapid development of drug resistance. Moreover, only about 40% of AGC pts. are eligible for second-line treatment., Methods: This is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial. It aims at assessing whether switch maintenance to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel will extend the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects with HER-2 negative AGC who have not progressed after 3 months of a first-line with a platinum/fluoropyrimidine regimen (either FOLFOX4, mFOLFOX6 or XELOX). The primary endpoint is to compare Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of patients in ARM A (switch maintenance to ramucirumab and placlitaxel) versus ARM B (continuation of the same first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine). Secondary endpoints are: overall survival, time-to-treatment failure, overall response rate, duration of response, percentage of patients that will receive a second line therapy according to arm treatment, safety, quality of life. Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues are planned in order to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis., Discussion: The ARMANI study estimates if patients treated with early swich with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel received benefit when compared to those treated with continuation of first line therapy. The hypothesis is that the early administration of an active, non-cross resistant second-line regimen such as ramucirumab plus paclitaxel may prolong the time in which patients are progression-free, and consequently have a better quality of life. Moreover, this strategy may rescue all those subjects that become ineligible for second-line therapy due to the rapid deterioration of health status after the first disease progression., Trial Registration: ARMANI is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02934464 , October 17, 2016) and EudraCT(2016-001783-12, April 202,016).

Background: Ramucirumab-alone or combined with paclitaxel-represents one of the main options for patients failing first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer., Objective: The RAMoss study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of ramucirumab in the "real-life setting"., Patients and Methods: Patients from 25 Italian hospitals started therapy consisting of ramucirumab 8 mg/kg i.v. d1,15q28 with or without paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 i.v. d1,8,15q28. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: One hundred sixty-seven patients with disease progression on first-line therapy received ramucirumab as monotherapy (10%) or combined with paclitaxel (90%). Median treatment duration was 4 months (1-17 months). Global incidence of grade (G) 3-4 toxicity was 9.6%, and for neutropenia 5.4%; treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 3% of patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE) were G1-2 fatigue (27.5%), G1-2 neuropathy (26.3%), and G1-2 neutropenia (14.9%). ORR was 20.2%. Stable disease was observed in 39.2% of patients, with a disease control rate of 59.4%. With a median follow-up of 11 months, median PFS was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-4.7), whereas median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI: 7.09-8.9). In a multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status <1 or ≥1 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.0-1.27, p = 0.04) and the presence versus absence of peritoneal metastases (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.63-2.39, p = 0.03) were independent poor prognostic factors., Conclusions: These "real-life" efficacy data on ramucirumab treatment are in line with previous randomized trials. Ramucirumab is well tolerated in daily clinical practice.

Background: No prospective trials have specifically addressed the efficacy and safety of panitumumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of single agent panitumumab in "frail" elderly patients diagnosed with metastatic RAS and BRAF wild-type CRC., Materials and Methods: Forty elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) with metastatic RAS-BRAF wild-type CRC received off-label prescriptions of single-agent panitumumab at seven Italian institutions. Treatment was administered as first line in patients with absolute contraindication to any chemotherapy or as second-line treatment after failure of a fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, in the presence of contraindication to irinotecan. The outcome measures included objective response rate (ORR), as well as progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: The median PFS and OS were 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-8 months) and 14.3 months (95% CI: 10.9-17.7 months), respectively. ORR was 32.5%, and DCR was 72.5%. Dose reductions related to adverse events (AEs) were reported in 9 (23%) patients, but no permanent treatment discontinuation caused by was reported. The most frequent grade 3 AE was skin rash, with an incidence of 20%., Conclusion: Panitumumab is effective and well-tolerated in frail elderly patients with RAS-BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC and deemed unfit for chemotherapy. A randomized study is needed to confirm these data., Implications for Practice: Treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer represents a difficult challenge in clinical practice. A significant proportion of frail elderly patients do not receive treatment, reflecting ongoing uncertainty of clinical benefit and toxicity of chemotherapy. Unfit condition in this cohort of patients further limits antineoplastic prescription and consequently patient survival. RAS and BRAF wild-type status could help select an elderly and unfit population that could benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor single agent therapy. In the present study, single-agent off-label panitumumab was effective and well-tolerated as first-line treatment in frail elderly patients deemed unfit for chemotherapy for metastatic RAS and BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer., (©AlphaMed Press.)

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma is rapidly changing as a result of recent evidence concerning the efficacy of biological drugs, antiangiogenetic agents and signal-transduction inhibitors. This paper will provide a critical overview of the use of immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma and review the available data concerning the efficacy of interferons, interleukin-2 and other forms of immunological treatment, particularly allogenic transplantation and vaccines. Moreover, it will focus on the new mechanisms of regulation of the immune system with a better understanding of the interaction between host and tumor, the role of T regulatory cells, heat-shock proteins and vaccines. The mechanism of action and the results obtained in renal cell carcinoma using the new molecular targeted drugs will be examined, along with the possibility of using immunotherapy combined with the new biological agents. Future research will not only need to make every effort to optimize the use of the new molecules and to define their efficacy precisely, but also to consider how to integrate these drugs with the traditional immunotherapy.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine in older women with advanced breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Seventy-three eligible patients (median age, 73 years; range, 65 to 89 years) were enrolled. The first 30 patients received oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days. Due to the occurrence of two toxic deaths, capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily was given to the subsequent 43 patients., Results: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. A total of 351 treatment cycles were administered (median, six per patient; range, one to eight cycles). Dose reductions due to toxicities were required in 30% of patients in the standard-dose group, but capecitabine was given without a dose reduction to 95% of patients in the low-dose group. Capecitabine demonstrated a favorable safety profile. The overall incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was low: the most common events reported in /= 24 weeks. In the low-dose group, the response rate was 34.9% (95% CI, 21% to 50.9%). An additional 15 patients had prolonged stabilization. The median time to disease progression was 4 months in either group., Conclusion: This study shows that capecitabine is safe and effective in the elderly breast cancer patient. Based on the overall results, the capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily merits consideration as "standard" for older patients who do not have severely impaired renal function.

It has been proposed that knowledge of estrogen receptor beta (ER-beta) expression may refine estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) predictivity of response to endocrine therapy. We challenged this hypothesis in ER-alpha-positive breast cancers subjected to preoperative antiestrogen treatment. Forty-seven elderly (> or =65 years old) women with nonmetastatic, ER-alpha-positive (by immunohistochemistry) primary breast cancers (> 2 cm in diameter) entered a neoadjuvant hormone therapy protocol (60 mg/day toremifene for 3 months). ER-alpha and ER-beta (ERs) mRNA was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR, before (on core needle biopsy) and after (on surgical specimens) neoadjuvant treatment. Study end points included: (1) relation between treatment response and ER mRNA expression; and (2) changes in ER expression after treatment. The response was clinically assessed as tumor size change at the end of the preoperative treatment. ER mRNA expression was assessable before and after treatment in 38 and 20 cases respectively. ER-beta was co-expressed with ER-alpha at variable levels and significantly correlated only with progesterone receptor (P = 0.0285). Objective clinical response, including patients with minor change (> or =25-<50% tumor shrinkage after treatment), was documented in 68.4% of cases and was independent of ER-beta levels or changes. ER-alpha levels were higher in tumors from patients in complete remission than in those from women achieving partial response or minor change compared with non-responsive patients (median expression values: 801 versus 516 versus 320 arbitrary units) and were consistently down-regulated by preoperative treatment. We conclude that in this elderly patient population with ER-alpha-positive tumors, ER-beta mRNA was neither predictive of response to preoperative toremifene nor provided additional information to the knowledge of ER-alpha mRNA levels, which, conversely, were directly correlated with likelihood of response.

In postmenopausal patients, estrogens have an important role in breast cancer growth and aromatase inhibitors (AI) suppress the aromatase enzyme system which converts androgens into estrogens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on estrogen suppression of formestane 250 mg i.m. fortnightly, given immediately after the failure of a previous treatment with non-steroidal AI. Twenty-two advanced breast cancer patients progressing on letrozole, anastrozole and aminoglutethimide entered the study. At the beginning of the study, the serum estrogen levels were suppressed by the previous treatment with non-steroidal AI, and the following treatment with formestane moderately maintained this suppression; in four patients serum estrogen levels increased fivefold after 10 weeks. Neither complete nor partial responses were observed; 11 patients (50%) showed a stable disease lasting > or = 6 months, and the median time to progression was 6 months (range 3-9 months). No correlation was observed between clinical responses and serum estrogen suppression. Tolerability was satisfactory, and no patient withdrew from the study due to adverse events. In conclusion, formestane has demonstrated a moderate activity in estrogen suppression, and there is evidence that, at the failure of a previous treatment with non-steroidal AI, the sequential use of steroidal AI is feasible. This approach can be used in clinical practice in order to offer a disease control with a satisfactory quality of life.

Postmenopausal hormone-sensitive breast cancer is currently treated with either antioestrogens or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), due to the clinical efficacy and safety of these drugs. Today's challenge is the sequential use of AIs with different structure and no cross-resistance to improve the therapeutic outcome. The present study describes the biological action of the steroidal structure (SS)-AI exemestane (EXE), in patients progressing on aminoglutethimide (AG) or other non-steroidal structure (NSS)-AIs (letrozole or anastrozole). Thirteen patients were evaluated for serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) components [total IGF-1, IGF-2 and IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3], interleukin (IL)-6 system [IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6-R)] and bone metabolism markers [bone gla protein/osteocalcin (BGP), bone-specific isoform of alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and carboxy-telopeptide of type I procollagen (ICTP)]. IGF system components show a trend to increase both in patients progressing on AG and in patients progressing on other NSS-AIs. Such an increase depends on the wash-out length from the previous treatment and is strictly linked to the circulating oestrogen levels. Serum IL-6 and sIL-6-R are mainly related to the patients' clinical outcome. Bone formation (BGP and BAP) and bone resorption (ICTP) markers seem to be at equilibrium with oestrogen levels when starting EXE and do not appear to be uncoupled over treatment. The observed variations seem to be mainly linked to the circulating oestrogen levels rather than directly to the way of action of the AI employed.

Fluoropyrimidines remain the most important drugs in the treatment of breast and colorectal carcinoma, but response rates and survival time have been disappointing. Optimal administration is by continuous intravenous infusion, which makes it cumbersome to use and compromises patient independence. Recently, a number of new agents, including fluorouracil prodrugs and selective dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitors, have been studied, with promising results. Capecitabine is the first in a new class of fluoropyrimidines. It is an oral, tumor-activated anticancer drug whose activity mimics that of continuously infused 5-fluorouracil. Capecitabine circumvents dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase catabolism and appears to be at least as active against metastatic colorectal and breast cancer as conventionally administered intravenous 5-fluorouracil, with significantly less toxicity, an improved quality of life, and lesser cost. Capecitabine may ultimately provide enhanced antitumor activity to fluorouracil-containing regimes for advanced colorectal and breast cancer.

Experimental studies have shown that IL-12 plays an important role in the activation of the anticancer immune defenses. Unfortunately, at present the behavior of IL-12 secretion in human neoplasms remain to be established. In an attempt to draw some preliminary data about IL-12 secretion in human cancer, in the present study we have evaluated serum levels of IL-12 in a group of non-metastatic and metastatic solid tumor patients in relation to the survival time, and their changes in surgically treated cancer patients and in metastatic patients undergoing immunotherapy with IL-2. Mean serum levels of IL-12 were significantly higher metastatic patients (n = 40) than in those with locally limited solid neoplasm (n = 16). Moreover, within the metastatic group, the percent of 1-year survival was significantly higher in patients with abnormally elevated blood concentrations of IL-12 than in those with normal values. In the group of 10 patients surgically treated for gastrointestinal tract tumors, the surgical operation induced a significant decline in IL-12 mean serum levels. Finally, in a group of 23 metastatic renal cell cancer patients treated with IL-12 immunotherapy (6 million IU/day S.C. for 6 days/week for 4 weeks), the treatment was associated with a significant and progressive increase in IL-12 mean values. Moreover, serum mean levels of IL-12 observed in therapy in patients with response or stable disease were significantly higher than those found in progressing patients. This preliminary study seems to suggest that the evidence of high levels of IL-12 may have a favourable prognostic significance in solid tumor patients, either in baseline conditions or in response to IL-2 cancer immunotherapy.