Search

Background: There are a limited number of studies comparing psoriasis patients without psoriatic arthritis (PsA) to those with arthritis. Previous results are controversial., Objectives: To perform a comparative analysis of the phenotype, baseline comorbidities, therapeutic profile and incidence of adverse events (particularly overall adverse events, infections and infestations, malignancies and psychiatric disorders) among psoriatic patients with/without PsA., Methods: All the patients on the Biobadaderm registry, a prospective inception cohort of psoriasis patients on systemic therapy, were included. Patients were divided into two groups: those with psoriasis without arthritis at the time of entry into the cohort (Pso group) and those with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA group) at entry. Patients were followed until the censorship date (last visit in a lost-to-follow-up patient, or 10 November 2015, whichever occurred first). We excluded all the patients who developed any kind of signs and/or symptoms of joint involvement during the follow-up. A descriptive analysis was performed. We estimated incidence ratios (IRR) of adverse events during systemic treatment using a mixed-effects Poisson regression., Results: We included 2120 patients: 1871 (88%) patients with psoriasis without arthritis and 249 (12%) with psoriasis and PsA. The follow-up time was 5020 patients-year in the Pso group and 762 patients-year in the PsA group. Patients with PsA had more comorbidities, particularly hypertension and liver disease; used a higher number of systemic therapies, particularly anti-TNFα drugs and combination therapy; and presented more adverse events (IRR adjusted = 1.29; 95% CI: [1.05-1.58]), particularly serious adverse events (IRR adjusted = 1.51; 95% CI: [1.01-2.26]) and infections/infestations (IRR adjusted = 1.88; 95% CI: [1.27-2.79]), independently of the associated comorbidities and present/past therapies., Conclusions: Given the differences between patients with psoriasis alone or with psoriasis associated with PsA, patients with psoriasis and PsA should be followed and managed more closely and with specific attention., (© 2017 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease whose psychosocial effects can greatly impair quality of life. Various scales are used to classify the severity of acne, and several treatment algorithms are currently applied: no consensus on a common scale or treatment guidelines has been reached. A group of Spanish experts therefore met to identify a scale the majority could accept as the most appropriate for classifying severity and treating accordingly. The group chose the following classifications: comedonal acne, mild or moderate papulopustular acne, severe papulopustular acne, moderate nodular acne, and nodular-cystic acne (or acne tending to leave scars). Consensus was reached on first- and second-choice treatments for each type and on maintenance treatment. The experts also issued specific recommendations on antibiotic use (starting with mild or moderate papulopustular acne), always in combination with retinoids and/or benzoyl peroxide. The use of isotretinoin (starting at severe papulopustular or moderate nodular acne) was also covered., (Copyright © 2016 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: We now have considerable experience in the use of biologic agents to treat psoriasis, but doubts about management arise in certain clinical settings. Surgery is one of them. Although treatment guidelines advise that biologics be suspended before major surgery, data about actual clinical practices and associated complications are lacking. We aimed to analyze current practice in the clinical management of these cases., Methods: Retrospective study of cases in the Biobadaderm database. We analyzed the management of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis who underwent surgical procedures., Results: Forty-eight of the 2113 patients registered in Biobadaderm underwent surgery. The largest percentage of procedures (31%) involved skin lesions. Biologic treatment was interrupted in 42% of the cases. No postsurgical complications were significantly related to treatment interruption. Likewise we detected no associations between treatment interruption and other variables, such as sex, age, or duration or severity of psoriasis., Conclusion: Continuity of biologic treatment and the risk of postsurgical complications were not associated in this study, although conclusions are limited by the small sample size., (Copyright © 2016 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Many current guidelines provide detailed evidence-based recommendations for acne treatment., Objective: To create consensus-based, simple, easy-to-use algorithms for clinical acne treatment in daily office-based practice and to provide checklists to assist in determining why a patient may not have responded to treatment and what action to take., Methods: Existing treatment guidelines and consensus papers were reviewed. The information in them was extracted and simplified according to daily clinical practice needs using a consensus-based approach and based on the authors' clinical expertise., Results: As outcomes, separate simple algorithms are presented for the treatment of predominant comedonal, predominant papulopustular and nodular/conglobate acne. Patients with predominant comedonal acne should initially be treated with a topical retinoid, azelaic acid or salicylic acid. Fixed combination topicals are recommended for patients with predominant papulopustular acne with treatment tailored according to the severity of disease. Treatment recommendations for nodular/conglobate acne include oral isotretinoin or fixed combinations plus oral antibiotics in men, and these options may be supplemented with oral anti-androgenic hormonal therapy in women. Further decisions regarding treatment responses should be evaluated 8 weeks after treatment initiation in patients with predominant comedonal or papulopustular acne and 12 weeks after in those with nodular/conglobate acne. Maintenance therapy with a topical retinoid or azelaic acid should be commenced once a patient is clear or almost clear of their acne to prevent the disease from recurring. The principal explanations for lack of treatment response fall into 5 main categories: disease progression, non-drug-related reasons, drug-related reasons, poor adherence, and adverse events., Conclusion: This practical guide provides dermatologists with treatment algorithms adapted to different clinical features of acne which are simple and easy to use in daily clinical practice. The checklists to establish the causes for a lack of treatment response and subsequent action to take will facilitate successful acne management., (© 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most frequently used conventional systemic drug in the treatment of psoriasis. Despite over 50years of experience in this setting, certain aspects of the use of this drug in clinical practice are still little standardized and poorly understood. For this reason, a group of 15 experts took part in a consensus development conference to achieve consensus on a series of recommendations on the use of MTX in psoriasis. The guidelines, which were developed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, were validated by 2 rounds of voting and categorized by level of evidence and grade of recommendation. Before MTX can be used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis, the patient must be evaluated to assess the suitability of the treatment, including consideration of vaccination status and screening for tuberculosis and pregnancy. The recommended starting dose for a patient with no risk factors is 10 to 20mg/wk, the therapeutic dose for most patients is 15mg/wk, and the maximum dose is 20mg/wk. Most patients who respond to treatment will show improvement within 8weeks. Parenteral administration of MTX is desirable when there is a risk of erroroneous dosing, nonadherence, gastrointestinal intolerance, or inadequate response to the therapeutic dose taken orally. Noninvasive methods are preferred for monitoring hepatotoxicity. MTX is a good treatment option for patients with a history of cancer, but is not recommended in patients with chronic hepatitisB infection or individuals who are seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

The clinical distinction between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and intradermal melanocytic nevus lesions on the face can be difficult, particularly in young patients or patients with multiple nevi. Dermoscopy is a useful tool for analyzing characteristic dermoscopic features of BCC, such as cartwheel structures, maple leaf-like areas, blue-gray nests and dots, and ulceration. It also reveals arborizing telangiectatic vessels and prominent curved vessels, which are typical of BCC, and comma vessels, which are typical of intradermal melanocytic nevi. It is, however, not always easy to distinguish between these 2 conditions, even when dermoscopy is used. We describe 2 facial lesions that posed a clinical and dermoscopic challenge in two 38-year-old patients; confocal microscopy showed separation between tumor nests and stroma and polarized nuclei, which are confocal microscopy features of basal cell carcinoma., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Spanish registry of Mohs micrographic surgery started collecting data in July 2013. The aim of the registry is to report on the use of this technique in Spain and the outcomes achieved. In the present article, we describe the characteristics of patients and the tumors treated., Material and Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. The participating centers are hospitals where at least one intervention of this type is performed each week. All patients considered for Mohs micrographic surgery in participating centers are included in the registry except those who have been declared legally incompetent., Results: Between July 2013 and October 2014, data from 655 patients were included in the registry. The most common tumor involved was basal cell carcinoma, and the most common histological subtype was infiltrative basal cell carcinoma. Most of the tumors treated were located on the face or scalp, and the most common site was the nose. Almost 40% of the tumors treated were recurrent or persistent, and preoperative tumor size was similar to that reported in other European studies and in Australia. In total, 45.5% of patients had received previous surgical treatment., Conclusion: The findings are similar to those reported in other studies, and the data collected are useful for assessing whether the results of studies carried out elsewhere are applicable in Spain., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Psoriatic arthritis, a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that is associated with psoriasis, causes joint erosions, accompanied by loss of function and quality-of-life. The clinical presentation is variable, with extreme phenotypes that can mimic rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. Because psoriasis usually presents before psoriatic arthritis, the dermatologist plays a key role in early detection of the latter. As many treatments used in psoriasis are also used in psoriatic arthritis, treatment recommendations should take into consideration the type and severity of both conditions. This consensus paper presents guidelines for the coordinated management of psoriatic arthritis by rheumatologists and dermatologists. The paper was drafted by a multidisciplinary group (6rheumatologists, 6dermatologists, and 2epidemiologists) using the Delphi method and contains recommendations, tables, and algorithms for the diagnosis, referral, and treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Biologic therapy is a well-established strategy for managing moderate and severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, the high cost of such therapy, the relatively short span of clinical experience with biologics, and the abundance of literature now available on these agents have made evidence-based and consensus-based clinical guidelines necessary. The ideal goal of psoriasis treatment is to achieve complete or nearly complete clearing of lesions and to maintain it over time. Failing that ideal, the goal would be to reduce involvement to localized lesions that can be controlled with topical therapy. Although current evidence allows us to directly or indirectly compare the efficacy or risk of primary or secondary failure of available biologics based on objective outcomes, clinical trial findings cannot be directly translated to routine practice. As a result, the prescribing physician must tailor the treatment regimen to the individual patient. This update of the clinical practice guidelines issued by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) on biologic therapy for psoriasis incorporates information from the most recent publications on this topic., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common form of skin cancer and its incidence has increased in recent decades. Most cSCCs are successfully treated by surgery, but local and distant metastases develop in approximately 5% of cases; this proportion is higher in certain forms of cSCC with high-risk factors, namely: tumor size >2cm, depth >2mm, Clark level ≥IV, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, poor differentiation, certain histologic subtypes (desmoplastic or adenosquamous carcinoma, invasive Bowen disease, or a cSCC arising in areas of chronic inflammation), immunosuppression, human papillomavirus infection, high-risk anatomic location (pinna of the ear, labial mucosa), expression of certain tumor genes, and inadequate tumor resection. The latest TNM (tumor, lymph node, metastasis) classification of cSCC published by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in the seventh edition of its Cancer Staging Manual now incorporates several of these risk factors to improve disease staging. We review all the factors currently considered to be markers of poor prognosis in cSCC and analyze the new AJCC classification and the different treatment options for high-risk cSCC., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) is subclassified into extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (including cutaneous lymphomas), splenic MZL, and nodal MZL. We report the case of a 68-year-old man with erythematous-violaceous plaques and nodules. Skin biopsy showed an epidermotropic lymphocytic infiltration and cytology and immunohistochemistry were consistent with MZL. The workup revealed disease in the peripheral blood and bone marrow and massive splenomegaly. Splenectomy confirmed the diagnosis of splenic MZL and led to resolution of the skin lesions. Cutaneous recurrence was treated successfully with chemotherapy and rituximab but caused fatal hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus reactivation. Skin involvement by splenic MZL is uncommon; this form of the disease can present epidermotropism, a very rare finding in primary cutaneous MZL. Treatment consists of splenectomy, which may be associated with chemotherapy and/or rituximab; this treatment may lead to reactivation of latent hepatitis B infection and screening for hepatitis should therefore be performed prior to starting therapy., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Lichen sclerosus is a chronic inflammatory disease that can progress to malignancy. The literature indicates an association with anogenital squamous cell carcinoma and verrucous carcinoma. Two pathogenic pathways, differentiated vulvar and penile intraepithelial neoplasias, which have recently been described in relation to squamous cell carcinoma, are both highly associated with genital lichen sclerosus independently of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Furthermore, tumor-promoting molecular changes unrelated to HPV infection have been demonstrated and may explain the malignant potential of lichen sclerosus. The possible relationship between HPV and genital lichen sclerosus currently remains open to discussion, and the prognostic importance of the overlapping of these 2 diseases is still unclear. This review considers the relationship between lichen sclerosus and squamous cell and verrucous carcinomas, the possible oncogenic mechanisms involved, and their possible association with HPV infection., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Treatment of mucosal vascular lesions is a challenge for dermatologists, although various approaches have proven efficacy, including surgery, sclerotherapy, intralesional injection of corticosteroids, transfixion, and laser therapy. The aim of this study was to describe the results of treatment with neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser in 11 patients with venous malformations and varicosities., Patients and Methods: We describe the use of variable-pulse Nd:YAG to treat venous malformations or varicosities in the oral or genital mucosa of 8 women and 3 men seen in our hospital over a 1-year period., Results: The following laser parameters were used: wavelength, 1064 nm; fluence, 100 to 200J/cm(2); spot diameter, 3 to 5mm; and pulse duration, 30 to 65 ms. The size of the lesions ranged from 5 to 30 mm. In all cases, a clearance of 75% to 100% was achieved in a single session with excellent healing and no significant side effects., Conclusions: Given its efficacy and ease of use, Nd:YAG may become a treatment of choice for mucosal vascular lesions. Comparative studies are now required to assess its potential superiority over other treatment options., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

During the Nazi period experimentation on human subjects and the elimination of individuals considered to be unproductive members of society were carried out in a systematic fashion. Involved in these practices were many physicians, including dermatologists whose names are linked in one way or another to their specialty. Some, such as Reiter, are very well known. This review attempts to bring to light the identities behind the names we have given to diseases, clinical and histological signs, and syndromes in dermatology., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The withdrawal of marketing authorization for efalizumab by the European Medicines Agency in February, 2009 provided a unique opportunity to assess the course of disease in patients who were not subject to the selection criteria and biases that were common in the pivotal trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the course of psoriasis following forced suspension of efalizumab in a group of patients treated in normal clinical practice. As secondary objectives, we sought to assess the relationships between clinical characteristics, treatment response, and disease course during efalizumab treatment and 12 and 24 weeks after suspension., Patients and Methods: Information on the epidemiological profile and disease course during treatment and following suspension of the drug was collected from a group of patients treated with efalizumab. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictive factors., Results: One hundred forty-seven patients from 12 Spanish hospitals were included in the study. During treatment, 4% of patients were diagnosed with generalized inflammatory flares. Most patients could be classified as having a good (55%) or moderate (18%) response to treatment. Rebound following withdrawal of efalizumab was observed in 30% of patients. The likelihood of rebound was independent of clinical characteristics, treatment response, or therapeutic approach used by the dermatologist following suspension., Conclusions: There was a high frequency of rebound following suspension of efalizumab, exceeding the rate reported in pivotal trials. This is particularly noteworthy given the large proportion of patients with a good response to treatment and therefore believed to have a better prognosis. Other significant findings were the higher frequency of positive treatment response than observed in previous studies (possibly influenced by the mean treatment duration) and the high frequency of generalized inflammatory flares., (2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Novel treatment strategies and new information concerning the management of moderate to severe psoriasis justify a reassessment of the role of the classic therapies in this setting. This consensus statement evaluates narrowband UV-B therapy, which is currently considered the phototherapy option of choice in psoriasis because of its risk-to-benefit ratio. The role of excimer laser and photodynamic therapies are also discussed. These targeted therapies are still only available in a small number of centers in Spain and are used principally in the treatment of localized and recalcitrant forms of psoriasis. We discuss the efficacy and safety of phototherapy as well as treatment regimens, combination therapy, and clinical considerations relating to the characteristics of the patient or the disease., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The Working Group on Psoriasis of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology has initiated BIOBADADERM, a registry of patients with psoriasis receiving treatment with biologic drugs, in order to assess the long-term risk of adverse events (AEs)., Material and Methods: A multicenter study was undertaken in 2 cohorts of patients with psoriasis: patients receiving biologic therapy and patients receiving nonbiologic systemic therapy other than phototherapy. Similar numbers of patients were included in each group. Information was recorded on demographic and clinical variables, treatment, and relevant AEs. The risk of specific AEs was determined by comparison of the frequencies for those events in the 2 cohorts., Results: Data on the 2 cohorts were evaluated for the period from October, 2008 to November, 2009 alongside retrospective data on patients treated with biologics since 2005. Thirteen Spanish hospitals participated in the study. A total of 632 patients were included in the analysis: 417 treated with biologic drugs and 215 controls. Suspension of biologic therapy due to AEs was rare (72 cycles, 10%). A total of 232 AEs were reported in patients receiving biologic therapy. The majority were not serious. The most frequent AEs were infections (mostly upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis), followed by conditions affecting the skin or subcutaneous tissue. Forty-three AEs were reported in control subjects. The most frequent events were metabolic and nutritional abnormalities and abnormal transaminase levels. Comparison of the incidence of any AE in patients treated with biologics compared with control subjects revealed a relative risk of 2.2 (P<.001) The relative risks of infections or infestations and disorders of the skin or subcutaneous tissue in patients receiving biologic drugs were 23 (P<.01) and 4.9 (P<.05), respectively., Conclusions: Patients treated with biologic drugs had a greater number of AEs, particularly infections and skin conditions. Definitive conclusions, however, are difficult to draw due to the small number of patients included in the registry, particularly in the control cohort, and the short follow-up period. Differences in the percentages of events reported by the different hospitals reveal the difficulties associated with the concept of AEs in clinical practice and highlight the need to harmonize criteria in the future. Since the problems identified in this analysis should be overcome in future years, we expect BIOBADADERM to become an important source of information on the safety profile of biologic drugs in dermatology., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Psoriasis, a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease that develops in genetically predisposed individuals, affects approximately 1.5% of the Spanish population. This disease has a negative impact on patients' quality of life, and long-term therapy is often required to control the symptoms. In addition to the classical systemic treatments (methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine, and ultraviolet light), the group of drugs known as biologics (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab) provides the dermatologist with an expanded therapeutic armamentarium, thereby improving the likelihood of controlling psoriasis in patients with severe and/or extensive disease. Methotrexate, a classic antipsoriatic drug, is still very useful either as single-drug therapy or in combination with other systemic drugs, particularly as a rescue therapy or combined with biologics. This article aims to establish the role of methotrexate in the treatment of psoriasis. We considered it of interest to develop guidelines for using methotrexate in the management of psoriasis with a view to ensuring the safe and proper use of this drug in the management of psoriasis. This document was developed by consensus among members of the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Objective: To describe the clinical management of psoriatic arthritis for patients being treated by dermatologists and rheumatologists in Spain., Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, naturalistic observational study in which demographic and clinical variables were recorded for patients diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis. Data referred to the previous 12 months and were collected during a single visit with the physician., Results: A total of 266 patients were enrolled; 78.1% were being treated by rheumatologists and 21.9% by dermatologists. The data covered 1138 visits. The main reason for consulting a physician was to monitor psoriatic arthritis (82.7% of the visits). The most widely used examination was to determine the tender- and swollen-joint count (73.1%). The tests most frequently ordered were acute-phase reactants: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (79.8%) and C reactive protein level (74.5%). Affected body surface area and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index were the main assessments used by dermatologists. Rheumatologists tended to examine the joints and record biochemical markers. A disease-modifying antirheumatic drug was prescribed for 71.1% of the patients; 51.8% were prescribed a biologic agent (61.5% in combination with another treatment). Treatment approach differed by specialty and was modified if response was nil or partial (the rationale for 45.1% of all changes)., Conclusion: Differences in the management of psoriatic arthritis in dermatology and rheumatology were evident in both diagnostic and treatment approaches. These 2 specialties should cooperate to establish common practice guidelines for use in Spain., (Copyright © 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. y AEDV. All rights reserved.)

Etanercept has been approved for the treatment of moderate-severe plaque psoriasis. This is the most frequent form of psoriasis (80%). In other forms of psoriasis, the use of etanercept, as that of other biological therapies, has been published in an isolated way with satisfactory results. We present a patient with palmoplantar pustulous psoriasis palmoplantar refractory to multiple treatments (topical corticosteroids, phototherapy, methotrexate) who responded favorably to the use of 50 mg biweekly doses of etanercept. The patient has maintained total remission of the lesions 6 months after having terminated treatment. We review the cases published on palmoplantar psoriasis treated with etanercept and also the use of this drug in other forms of pustular psoriasis and of erythrodermal psoriasis.

The common use of etanercept in the treatment of psoriasis entails that the dermatologist may encounter situations in which the need for temporary interruption of treatment may arise. In this article, an attempt has been made to establish guidelines on the interruption of etanercept within some circumstances, such as surgeries or vaccinations, the suspension time and when to reintroduce the drug.

Laser systems and other energy sources for home use are being developed and will have an exponential growth in the coming years. It is in the field of laser hair removal and hair regrowth where these lasers and intense pulsed light systems for home use are gaining most ground. There are few studies supporting their efficacy and safety and there are still no long term studies. Currently these systems do not require medical prescription and can be purchased in the same way as any over-the-counter product. Although they are not a substitute for professional medical systems, they will play an important role in the treatment of medical and cosmetic conditions, and dermatologists should know about them. Technological progress and commercial and market pressures will encourage the development of more sophisticated devices and broaden the cosmetic and medical indications. Appropriate use and rigorous long-term studies would be desirable to better define their safety and efficacy.

Background: Biologic therapies have been a major breakthrough in the treatment of psoriasis because they are more selective and have a better short-term and medium-term safety profile. There are reliable data to support both the efficacy and the safety of these drugs. However, it is always useful to report the clinical experience of dermatologists who are experts in the use of biologic agents to treat psoriasis, particularly with regard to their safety., Material and Methods: We present the results of a survey administered to the members of Spanish Psoriasis Group and based on a series of questions referring to the clinical safety of these agents. A total of 988 patients treated with efalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab were reported by 15 members of the group., Results: There was a particularly high proportion of reactions (34%) to infliximab infusions. Blood test abnormalities were detected in 13.25% of patients and infections in 12.24%, with one case of pulmonary tuberculosis. Attention is drawn to the adverse effects profile of efalizumab: de novo arthritis in 5.8% and rebound in 20.9% of patients., Conclusion: The safety data provided by our study should be taken into account in view of the large number of patients recruited by dermatologists experienced in the use of this type of therapy.

Computerization, with a change from paper to electronic format, represents an alternative to traditional information management. This model offers advantages in legibility, uniformity, accessibility, and use of the data. However, it is not easy to apply this process to clinical practice as it requires a suitable network, continuous application development, an implementation strategy, and the cooperation of all staff involved. We have reviewed our experience in the development and introduction of electronic health records and their adaptation to a pioneer dermatology department in Spain. Since our hospital was opened 1998, the model used is that of a single, centralized electronic health record, with supplementary departmental attributes. The electronic health record is conceived as an interactive database designed around the patient, with a procedure-based structure, and that obviates the need for hardcopies (paper or films) in practically all situations; it must comply with legal requirements. The system is installed on central servers maintained by the information technology department. The potential is unlimited; particularly important possibilities include clinical guideline-directed care, remote connection for general practitioners, and online activity, stock, and quality management. With the aim of realizing this potential, a technological change was started in 2003, moving towards what was to become the chosen system in the Community of Madrid to cope with the workload arising from new hospitals.

The treatment of psoriasis has been revolutionized by the introduction of biologic agents; these agents achieve skin clearance and long-term improvement without the risk of toxicity that has limited use of the classic systemic treatments. The role of systemic treatment in the management of psoriasis is being reviewed on the basis of a large volume of scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of biologic agents, and new therapeutic goals and strategies are being devised for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This has led to the need to establish severity criteria that will provide the rationale for the indication of the different systemic agents currently available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, as well as therapeutic goals, efficacy measures, therapeutic strategies, screening protocols, and choice of treatment based on the risk-benefit ratio of the different agents. These criteria must be established through consensus by experienced dermatologists and based on available scientific evidence. The present document reflects the consensus of the Spanish Psoriasis Group on these different issues in the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Cutaneous follicular center B-cell lymphomas are indolent tumors characterized by the presence of neoplastic follicular center cells. They contain a mixture of centrocytes with a variable number of centroblasts. The tumor is usually treated by surgery or radiotherapy, although other treatments may be used such as interferon-alpha, chemotherapy, and biological agents (rituximab). Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody that can be administered intravenously or intralesionally. We report the case of a 41-year-old man who consulted for violaceous nodular lesions in the left scapular region and who was diagnosed with cutaneous follicular center B-cell lymphoma after biopsy, laboratory tests, thoracic-abdominal-pelvic computed tomography, abdominal ultrasound, and bone marrow biopsy. It was decided to treat him with 30 mg of intralesional rituximab administered for 1 week (3 times) every month for 4 months. Complete response was obtained. We also review the published cases of cutaneous B-cell lymphoma treated with intralesional rituximab.

In the last years new and numerous materials for the correction of defects and wrinkles have been developed. One of these materials is Bio-Alcamid, a non reabsorbable gel polymer constituted by meshes of poly-alkyl-imide, without known adverse effects. We report a 34-year-old woman that had Bio-Alcamid implants for acne scars and several months after presented nodular lesions together with a painful inflammatory nodule. The nodule was drained and culture of the purulent material yielded Streptococcus viridans. A cytology and a cellular block of that material showed a granulomatous inflammatory reaction together with a foreign body. The different types of reactions to implants and their pathogenic mechanism are discussed. It is important to know these possible reactions to filler materials given their increasing use and the potential medico-legal consequences.

We describe a 40-year-old white man with a peculiar skin eruption in association with polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia. No underlying disease was detected. A skin biopsy specimen showed a proliferation of mature plasma cells intermingled with some lymphocytes and histiocytes, an appearance consistent with cutaneous plasmacytosis. This disease had been previously described only in Japanese patients. In our patient the disease progressed slowly. Lymph node infiltration by mature plasma cells was later noted.

Febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease in an 18-year-old man is reported. This disease is a severe form of pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta (PLEVA) and is characterized by the sudden onset of diffuse coalescent ulcerations associated with high fever and systemic symptoms. In the present case the disease was preceded by typical PLEVA. Histologically, a leukocytoclastic vasculitis was seen in addition to the usual features of PLEVA. Findings of laboratory studies revealed an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a high white blood cell count, and a mild increase in liver enzymes. No systemic involvement was detected. Findings of T cell receptor gene analysis in skin and peripheral blood showed no abnormality. The patient was treated with PUVA and methotrexate with a good response. We review the eight previously reported cases of febrile ulceronecrotic Mucha-Habermann disease.