Search

Background: Radiation worker categorization and exposure monitoring practices must be proportional to the current working environment.Purpose: To analyze exposure data of Finnish radiological workers and to estimate the magnitude and frequency of their potential occupational radiation exposure, and to propose appropriate radiation worker categorization.Material and Methods: Estimates of the probabilities of annual effective doses exceeding certain levels were obtained by calculating the survival function of a lognormal probability density function (PDF) fitted in the measured occupational exposure data.Results: The estimated probabilities of exceeding annual effective dose limits of 1 mSv, 6 mSv, and 20 mSv were in the order of 1:200, 1:10,000, and 1:500,000 per person, respectively.Conclusion: It is very unlikely that the Category B annual effective dose limit of 6 mSv could even potentially be exceeded using modern equipment and appropriate working methods. Therefore, in terms of estimated effective dose, workers in diagnostic and interventional radiology could be placed into Category B in Finland. Current national personal monitoring practice could be replaced or supplemented using active personal dosimeters, which offer more effective means for optimizing working methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation worker categorization and exposure monitoring are principal functions of occupational radiation safety. The aim of this study was to use the actual occupational exposure data in a large university hospital to estimate the frequency and magnitude of potential exposures in radiology. The additional aim was to propose a revised categorization and exposure monitoring practice based on the potential exposures. The cumulative probability distribution was calculated from the normalized integral of the probability density function fitted to the exposure data. Conformity of the probabilistic model was checked against 16 years of national monitoring data. The estimated probabilities to exceed annual effective dose limits of 1 mSv, 6 mSv and 20 mSv were 1:1000, 1:20 000 and 1:200 000, respectively. Thus, it is very unlikely that the class A categorization limit of 6 mSv could be exceeded, even in interventional procedures, with modern equipment and appropriate working methods. Therefore, all workers in diagnostic and interventional radiology could be systematically categorized into class B. Furthermore, current personal monitoring practice could be replaced by use of active personal dosemeters that offer more effective and flexible means to optimize working methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to assess and compare the organ and effective doses in the knee area resulting from different commercially available multislice computed tomography devices (MSCT), one cone beam computed tomography device (CBCT) and one conventional X-ray radiography device using MOSFET dosemeters and an anthropomorphic RANDO knee phantom. Measurements of the MSCT devices resulted in effective doses ranging between 27 and 48 µSv. The CBCT measurements resulted in an effective dose of 12.6 µSv. The effective doses attained using the conventional radiography device were 1.8 µSv for lateral and 1.2 µSv for anterior–posterior projections. The effective dose resulting from conventional radiography was considerably lower than those recorded for the CBCT and MSCT devices. The MSCT effective dose results were two to four times higher than those measured on the CBCT device. This study demonstrates that CBCT can be regarded as a potential low-dose 3D imaging technique for knee examinations. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The best compression paddle position during air kerma measurement in mammography dosimetry was studied. The amount of forward scattering as a function of the compression paddle distance was measured with different X-ray spectra and different types of paddles and dose meters. The contribution of forward scattering to the air kerma did not present significant dependency on the beam quality or of the compression paddle type. The tested dose meter types detected different amounts of forward scattering due to different internal collimation. When the paddle was adjusted to its maximum clinical distance, the proportion of the detected forward scattering was only 1 % for all dose meter types. The most consistent way of performing air kerma measurements is to position the compression paddle at the maximum distance from the dose meter and use a constant forward scattering factor for all dose meters. Thus, the dosimetric uncertainty due to the forward scatter can be minimised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Radiation exposure monitoring is a traditional keystone of occupational radiation safety measures in medical imaging. The aim of this study was to review the data on occupational exposures in a large central university hospital radiology organisation and propose changes in the radiation worker categories and methods of exposure monitoring. An additional objective was to evaluate the development of electronic personal dosimeters and their potential in the digitised radiology environment. The personal equivalent dose of 267 radiation workers (116 radiologists and 151 radiographers) was monitored using personal dosimeters during the years 2006–2010. Accumulated exposure monitoring results exceeding the registration threshold were observed in the personal dosimeters of 73 workers (59 radiologists' doses ranged from 0.1 to 45.1 mSv; 14 radiographers' doses ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 mSv). The accumulated personal equivalent doses are generally very small, only a few angiography radiologists have doses >10 mSv per 5 y. The typical effective doses are <10 µSv y−1 and the highest value was 0.3 mSv (single interventional radiologist). A revised categorisation of radiation workers based on the working profile of the radiologist and observed accumulated doses is justified. Occupational monitoring can be implemented mostly with group dosimeters. An active real-time dosimetry system is warranted to support radiation protection strategy where optimisation aspects, including improving working methods, are essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The dose display values of computed tomography (CT) devices are used for patient dose estimation and as a tool for optimisation. Therefore, the dose display value accuracy should be verified. In practice, this means doing measurements in the standard phantoms and comparing results with the dose display values. The traditional method for measuring CT dose enables measurements only for one axial rotation, and there has not been a method for measuring the dose of a complete helical scan sequence. In this work, a new method for a direct measurement of the dose of a complete helical sequence is developed and tested. Results show that this method is practical and that the accuracy of the modern CT devices seems to be at the sufficient level, so that the dose display values can be used for patient dose estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Radiology is now predominantly a digital medium and this has extended the flexibility, efficiency and application of medical imaging. Achieving the full benefit of digital radiology requires images to be of sufficient quality to make a reliable diagnosis for each patient, while minimising risks from radiation exposure, and so involves a careful balance between competing objectives. When an optimisation programme is undertaken, a knowledge of patient doses from surveys can be valuable in identifying areas needing attention. However, any dose reduction measures must not degrade image quality to the extent that it is inadequate for the clinical purpose. The move to digital imaging has enabled versatile image acquisition and presentation, including multi-modality display and quantitative assessment, with post-processing options that adjust for optimal viewing. This means that the appearance of an image is unlikely to give any indication when the dose is higher than necessary. Moreover, options to improve performance of imaging equipment add to its complexity, so operators require extensive training to be able to achieve this. Optimisation is a continuous rather than single stage process that requires regular monitoring, review, and analysis of performance feeding into improvement and development of imaging protocols. The ICRP is in the process of publishing two reports about optimisation in digital radiology. The first report sets out components needed to ensure that a radiology service can carry optimisation through. It describes how imaging professionals should work together as a team and explains the benefits of having appropriate methodologies to monitor performance, together with the knowledge and expertise required to use them effectively. It emphasises the need for development of organisational processes that ensure tasks are carried out. The second ICRP report deals with practical requirements for optimisation of different digital radiology modalities, and builds on information provided in earlier modality specific ICRP publications., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the optimal post-operative CT imaging method that enables best visualization of facial bony structures in the vicinity of osteosynthesis material., Methods: Conducted at Töölö Hospital (Helsinki, Finland), this study relied on scanning a phantom with CBCT, 64-slice CT and high-definition multislice CT with dual-energy scan (providing monochromatic images of 70-, 100-, 120- and 140-keV energy levels) and iterative reconstruction (IR) methods. Two radiologists assessed the image quality, and the assessments were analyzed. In addition, a physicist performed a semi-quantitative analysis of the metal-induced artefacts., Results: The three subjects most easily assessed were the loose screw and both the bone structure and the fracture further away from the screw and the plate. Soft tissues adjacent to the screw and the plate remained more difficult for assessment. Both image interpreters agreed that the artefacts disturbed their assessments under dual energy. Metal artefacts disturbed the least under multislice CT with IR [adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) and VEO]. Neither interpreter found metal suppression helpful in CBCT., Conclusions: CBCT with or without a metal artefact reduction algorithm was not optimal for post-operative facial imaging compared with multislice CT with IR. Multislice CT with ASiR filtering offered good image quality performance with fast image volume reconstruction, representing the current sweet spot in post-operative maxillofacial imaging.

Objectives: Dental radiography may involve situations where the patient is known to be pregnant or the pregnancy is noticed after the X-ray procedure. In such cases, the radiation dose to the foetus, though low, needs to be estimated. Uniform and widely used guidance on dental X-ray procedures during pregnancy are presently lacking, the usefulness of lead shields is unclear and practices vary., Methods: Upper estimates of radiation doses to the foetus and breasts of the pregnant patient were estimated with an anthropomorphic female phantom in intraoral, panoramic, cephalometric and CBCT dental modalities with and without lead shields., Results: The upper estimates of foetal doses varied from 0.009 to 6.9 μGy, and doses at the breast level varied from 0.602 to 75.4 μGy. With lead shields, the foetal doses varied from 0.005 to 2.1 μGy, and breast doses varied from 0.002 to 10.4 μGy., Conclusions: The foetal dose levels without lead shielding were <1% of the annual dose limit of 1 mSv for a member of the public. Albeit the relative shielding effect, the exposure-induced increase in the risk of breast cancer death for the pregnant patient (based on the breast dose only) and the exposure-induced increase in the risk of childhood cancer death for the unborn child are minimal, and therefore, need for foetal and breast lead shielding was considered irrelevant. Most important is that pregnancy is never a reason to avoid or to postpone a clinically justified dental radiographic examination.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to study different optimization methods for reducing eye lens dose in head CT., Materials and Methods: Two anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned with a routine head CT protocol for evaluation of the brain that included bismuth shielding, gantry tilting, organ-based tube current modulation, or combinations of these techniques. Highsensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters were used to measure local equivalent doses in the head region. The relative changes in image noise and contrast were determined by ROI analysis., Results: The mean absorbed lens doses varied from 4.9 to 19.7 mGy and from 10.8 to 16.9 mGy in the two phantoms. The most efficient method for reducing lens dose was gantry tilting, which left the lenses outside the primary radiation beam, resulting in an approximately 75% decrease in lens dose. Image noise decreased, especially in the anterior part of the brain. The use of organ-based tube current modulation resulted in an approximately 30% decrease in lens dose. However, image noise increased as much as 30% in the posterior and central parts of the brain. With bismuth shields, it was possible to reduce lens dose as much as 25%., Conclusion: Our results indicate that gantry tilt, when possible, is an effective method for reducing exposure of the eye lenses in CT of the brain without compromising image quality. Measurements in two different phantoms showed how patient geometry affects the optimization. When lenses can only partially be cropped outside the primary beam, organ-based tube current modulation or bismuth shields can be useful in lens dose reduction.

The same CT imaging program should not be applied to all patients, because the required image quality and dose of radiation vary according to the indications and regions. The programs should be optimized on the basis of indication, size of the patient and usage of intravenously administered iodine contrast agent. New technical options are available for reducing the radiation exposure. Additional means of optimization include proper definition of the region being imaged, avoidance of redundant series of images, selection of correct image quality, tube current and voltage, and new methods of calculating images. Patients' radiation exposure and clinical image quality should also be monitored.

Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of vertical centering on dose and image noise in chest MDCT of different-sized patients using anthropomorphic phantoms and retrospectively studying examinations of clinical patients., Materials and Methods: Three different anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned using different vertical centering (offset ± 6 cm) and were assessed with radiation dose-monitoring software. The effect of vertical positioning on the radiation dose was studied using the volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimates for different-sized phantoms. Image noise was determined from CT number histograms. Vertical positioning for chest CT examinations of 112 patients ranging from neonates to adults were retrospectively assessed., Results: Radiation doses were highest when using the posteroanterior scout image for automatic exposure control (AEC) and when phantoms were set in the lowest table position, and radiation doses were lowest when phantoms were set in the uppermost table position. For the adult phantom, relative doses increased by 38% in the lowest table position and decreased by 23% in the highest table position. Similarly, doses for pediatric 5-year-old and newborn phantoms were 21% and 12% higher in the lowest table position and 12% and 8% lower in the highest table position, respectively. The effect decreased when a lateral scout image was used for AEC. The relative noise was lowest when the phantoms were properly centered and increased with vertical offset. In clinical patients, we observed offset with a median value varying from 25 to 35 mm below the isocenter., Conclusion: Regardless of patient size, most patients in this study were positioned too low, which negatively affected both patient dose and image noise. Miscentering was more pronounced in smaller pediatric patients.

Objective: The purpose of our study was to review the experience of tracking radiologic procedures and radiation dose for individual patients in terms of impact on justification and optimization., Materials and Methods: Examples were collected at the Hospital for Children and Adolescents in Helsinki, Finland, through a PACS system that covers 33 institutions in the Helsinki-Uusimaa Hospital District in which reviewing previous radiologic procedures or radiation doses helped in either avoiding the next procedure or provided insight that helped to strengthen dose optimization for CT., Results: With the help of four case reports, our results show that availability of previous imaging studies and radiation dose figures helped to avoid additional new CT examinations by providing required information from previously performed CT examinations, indicate the need for imaging parameter optimization in one facility in view of a better situation detected in another facility, observe the need for further optimization with a specific CT unit and validate the outcome of successful optimization, and make a value judgment in a situation in which a patient has already undergone a number of CT examinations and a critical evaluation could avoid another one. Patient-specific optimization provides a more reliable and effective method than that of comparing average patient group values. Collective dose for a patient was not used in any situation in decision making., Conclusion: Patient-specific justification and optimization becomes possible using the tracking of radiologic procedures and radiation dose of individual patients.

While many radiologists are aware of the revolutionary development of computed tomography (CT)-scanners and their diagnostic implications, some researchers have focused on studying the potentials of mu-CT. The aim of this article is to give a brief overview of its physical properties and outline possible indications both for the real ex vivo and small animal mu-CT studies, as well as the modified mu-CT units used in dental practice.