51. Unveiling the consequences of your breach growth model choice
- Author
-
Peeters, P., Heredia Gomez, M., van Damme, M., Visser, P.J., Lang, M., Klijn, F., and Samuels, P.
- Subjects
lcsh:GE1-350 ,Engineering ,Operations research ,business.industry ,Realisation ,Breaching experiment ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING ,02 engineering and technology ,Growth model ,010501 environmental sciences ,01 natural sciences ,ComputingMilieux_MANAGEMENTOFCOMPUTINGANDINFORMATIONSYSTEMS ,021108 energy ,Frame work ,business ,lcsh:Environmental sciences ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Law and economics - Abstract
Within the frame work of the realisation of the ‘Sigmaplan’ for the river Schelde in Flanders (Belgium), a large-scale dike breaching experiment following overflow was held at Lillo (Antwerp) in 2012. The outcomes of the breach test serve to unveil the impact of a chosen breach growth model, to set application limits, to come up with guidelines for proper selection and usage of the model to be applied.Breach growth models are used to predict the breach dimensions and to estimate the flow through the breach. All assessed models pretty well succeed in this. However, starting from various premises and taking into account a (limited) set of different breaching mechanisms, the use of today’s state-of-the-art breach growth models is not entirely trouble free
- Published
- 2016