Search

Physiological changes associated with ageing could negatively impact the crisis resource management skills of acute care physicians. This study was designed to determine whether physician age impacts crisis resource management skills, and crisis resource management skills learning and retention using full-body manikin simulation training in acute care physicians. Acute care physicians at two Canadian universities participated in three 8-min simulated crisis (pulseless electrical activity) scenarios. An initial crisis scenario (pre-test) was followed by debriefing with a trained facilitator and a second crisis scenario (immediate post-test). Participants returned for a third crisis scenario 3–6 months later (retention post-test). For the 48 participants included in the final analysis, age negatively correlated with baseline Global Rating Scale (GRS; r=–0.30, P <0.05) and technical checklist scores (r =–0.44, P <0.01). However, only years in practice and prior simulation experience, but not age, were significant in a subsequent stepwise regression analysis. Learning from simulation-based education was shown with a mean difference in scores from pre-test to immediate post-test of 2.28 for GRS score (P <0.001) and 1.69 for technical checklist correct score (P <0.001); learning was retained for 3–6 months. Only prior simulation experience was significantly correlated with a decreased change in learning (r =–0.30, P <0.05). A reduced amount of prior simulation training and increased years in practice, but not age on its own, were significant predictors of low baseline crisis resource management performance. Simulation-based education leads to crisis resource management learning that is well retained for 3–6 months, regardless of age or years in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Microsoft HoloLens is a head-mounted mixed reality device, which allows for overlaying hologram-like computer-generated elements onto the real world. This technology can be combined with preprocedural ultrasound during thoracic epidural placement to create a visual of the ideal needle angulation and trajectory in the users' field of view. This could result in a technically easier and potentially safer alternative to traditional blind landmark techniques., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) HoloLens-assisted thoracic epidural technique (intervention-group H) or (2) traditional thoracic epidural technique (control-group C). The primary outcome was needling time (defined as skin puncture to insertion of epidural catheter) during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were number of needle punctures, number of needle movements, number of bone contacts, and epidural failure. Procedural pain and recovery room pain levels were also evaluated., Results: Eighty-three patients were included in this study. The primary outcome of procedure time was reduced in the HoloLens group compared with control (4.5 min vs 7.3 min, p=0.02, 95% CI), as was the number of needle movements required (7.2 vs 14.4, p=0.01), respectively. There was no difference in intraprocedure or postprocedure pain, bone contacts, or total number of needle punctures. Three patients in the control group experienced epidural failure versus one patient in the HoloLens group., Conclusions: This study shows that thoracic epidural placement may be facilitated by using a guidance hologram and may be more technically efficient., Trial Registration Number: NCT04028284., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) trial found similar ambulation and survival at 60 days with spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Trial outcomes evaluating pain, prescription analgesic use, and patient satisfaction have not yet been reported., Objective: To compare pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction after hip fracture surgery with spinal versus general anesthesia., Design: Preplanned secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02507505)., Setting: 46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals., Participants: Patients aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery., Intervention: Spinal or general anesthesia., Measurements: Pain on postoperative days 1 through 3; 60-, 180-, and 365-day pain and prescription analgesic use; and satisfaction with care., Results: A total of 1600 patients were enrolled. The average age was 78 years, and 77% were women. A total of 73.5% (1050 of 1428) of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery was greater with spinal anesthesia (rated from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]; mean difference, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68]). Pain did not differ across groups at other time points. Prescription analgesic use at 60 days occurred in 25% (141 of 563) and 18.8% (108 of 574) of patients assigned to spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (relative risk, 1.33 [CI, 1.06 to 1.65]). Satisfaction was similar across groups., Limitation: Missing outcome data and multiple outcomes assessed., Conclusion: Severe pain is common after hip fracture. Spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared with general anesthesia., Primary Funding Source: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute .