Search

BACKGROUND: PIK3CA mutations have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). We combined data from three completed Phase III Roche-sponsored randomized trials of HER2-targeted therapy for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic BC (MBC); this allowed for exploration of the prognostic impact of PIK3CA mutations observed in the three individual trials across subgroups of interest. METHODS: Data from CLEOPATRA (pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel [PHD] vs. placebo [Pla] + HD; NCT00567190; N = 808), MARIANNE (HD vs. ado-trastuzumab emtansine [K] + Pla vs. K + P; NCT01120184; N = 1095), and PUFFIN (PHD vs. Pla + HD; NCT02896855; N = 243) were included. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed to test the association between PIK3CA mutation status in tumor tissue (mutated vs. wild type [WT]) and efficacy (progression-free and overall survival [PFS/OS]) in different biomarker and clinical subgroups. Confounder adjustment was conducted for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, body mass index, treatment, disease type, and number of metastases (all at baseline). “Study” was included as a random effect in the IPD meta-analysis model to account for variability between studies. A landmark analysis was conducted on fast and non-fast progressors (cutoff of >137 days [i.e., after six chemotherapy cycles]) from CLEOPATRA and PUFFIN only, since they include the current standard-of-care regimens (PHD), by using Day 137 as the landmark time with separate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: PIK3CA mutation data were available for 1905/2146 patients (89%; ~80% from primary tissue); mutation prevalence was 27% (n = 521). PIK3CA-mutated vs. WT in association with PFS in pooled treatment arms is shown in the table. OS data were consistent. CONCLUSIONS: PIK3CA mutations were associated with a worse prognosis across subgroups of interest, including in fast and non-fast progressors, in the two PHD-containing studies as compared with the overall ITT population. Table: PIK3CA-mutated vs. WT in association with PFS in pooled treatment arms Citation Format: Sandra Swain, Javier Cortés, Binghe Xu, Chiara Lambertini, Laurent Essioux, Adam Knott, Eleonora Restuccia, Katrin Madjar, Sanne Lysbet De Haas. Association of PIK3CA mutations with efficacy in HER2-positive first-line metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-07.

Background: HR+/HER2– mBC, the most common subset of breast cancer, is treated with sequential endocrine therapy + targeted agents followed by sequential single-agent chemotherapy (CT), with increasingly shorter benefit duration with each subsequent treatment. High Trop-2 expression is observed in breast cancer regardless of subtype. SG is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study, SG showed both significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (HR, 0.66; P10- 0. Of Trop-2-evaluable pts, 192 (42%) and 270 (58%) had H-scores 10- Table Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Frederik Marmé, Javier Cortés, Peter Schmid, Delphine Loirat, Olivier Trédan, Eva Ciruelos, Florence Dalenc, Patricia Gómez Pardo, Komal Jhaveri, Monica Motwani, Oh Kyu Yoon, Hao Wang, Wendy Verret, Sara Tolaney. Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice (TPC): Efficacy by Trop-2 Expression in the TROPiCS-02 Study of Patients (Pts) With HR+/HER2– Metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-11.

Background: For HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, after resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), treatment options are mostly limited to traditional chemotherapies (CT) that offer poor survival and quality of life (QoL), creating an area of unmet need. The antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan (SG) comprises an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a hydrolyzable linker. In the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial, heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory HR+/HER2- MBC received SG vs single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC). The study met its primary endpoint of improved progression-free survival with SG vs TPC. Here, we report the effect of SG vs TPC on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from TROPiCS-02. Patients and Methods: Patients who had received ≥1 CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ≥1 ET, and 2-4 prior lines of CT were randomized to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenous on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine). In the PRO-evaluable population (all randomized patients with an evaluable assessment at baseline (BL) and ≥1 post-BL visit) SG and TPC were compared regarding time to first clinically meaningful worsening (TTD) or death from BL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (≥10 points), EQ-5D-5L health utility index (≥0.08 points), and EQ-VAS (≥7 points). For the EORTC QLQ-C30 function and global health status/QoL domains, patients with a BL score ≥10 and for symptom scales, patients with a BL score ≤90 were included. In the safety population (all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug), SG and TPC were compared regarding worst level of toxicities during treatment for the PRO-CTCAE items. For TTD, a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted and the PRO-CTCAE items were summarized descriptively (numbers and percentages). Results: Of 543 randomized patients, 446 (82%), 445 (82%), and 517 (95%) were included in the PRO-evaluable population (EORTC QLQ-C30: SG vs TPC n=236 vs 210 and EQ-5D-5L: n=238 vs 207) and in the safety population for PRO-CTCAE (SG vs TPC n=268 vs 249), respectively. TTD of EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL, physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, insomnia, and financial difficulties and EQ-VAS were significantly longer in the SG vs the TPC arm (Table). TTD of EORTC QLQ-C30 diarrhea was significantly shorter for SG vs TPC. For PRO-CTCAE items, decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, shortness of breath, and fatigue were similar between SG and TPC arms, whereas frequency of diarrhea and amount of hair loss were higher in the SG vs TPC arm. Conclusions: In this trial, SG significantly delayed worsening of overall QoL, physical and emotional functioning, and symptoms like fatigue, dyspnea, and insomnia. Overall, our findings suggest that SG has more favorable effects on PROs compared with TPC in pts with HR+/HER2- MBC. Table: Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration PRO Scores Citation Format: Frederik Marmé, Aditya Bardia, Hope Rugo, Peter Schmid, Sara M. Tolaney, Mafalda Oliveira, Andreas Schneeweiss, Ling Shi, Wendy Verret, Mahdi Gharaibeh, Anju Shah, Javier Cortés. Effect of sacituzumab govitecan vs chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the TROPiCS-02 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-65.

Background: DESTINY-Breast04 demonstrated that the HER2 targeting antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in pts in the hormone receptor−positive (HR+) cohort and all pts (HR+ and HR-; median PFS, 9.9 vs 5.1 months [mo], hazard ratio: 0.50; median OS, 23.4 vs 16.8 mo, hazard ratio: 0.64; both P < 0.0001; Modi et al. N Engl J Med 2022). Objective response rate (ORR) with T-DXd was ≥50% across cohorts. These subgroup analyses examine pt history and disease characteristics that may correlate with response to therapy. Methods: N = 557 pts with centrally confirmed HER2-low mBC were randomized 2:1 to T-DXd or TPC. Randomization was stratified by HER2 status (IHC 1+ vs 2+), 1 vs 2 prior lines of chemotherapy, and HR+ (with vs without prior treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor [CDK4/6i]) vs HR−. With the exception of the PFS and OS analyses by prior CDK4/6i use, all other described efficacy analyses were assessed post-hoc. Results: Benefit of T-DXd vs TPC was consistent in pts with or without prior CDK4/6i use (Table 1). Pts with high disease burden (ie, ≥3 metastatic sites) also benefited from T-DXd vs TPC (Table 2). There was a small subgroup (n = 22) among all pts (HR+ [n = 18] and HR− disease [n = 4]) with rapid progression prior to enrollment (disease progression within 6 mo of concluding a prior course of chemotherapy in early breast cancer). T-DXd showed responses in 7/14 (50%) pts in this subgroup vs 0/8 with TPC; this subgroup also had prolonged median PFS with T-DXd vs TPC (Table 3). Efficacy data for HER2 IHC 1+ vs 2+ and prior chemotherapy subgroups will be presented. Median OS was not reached for many subgroups (insufficient events in each group [data not shown]); however, subgroups in general showed OS benefit consistent with the primary analysis. With T-DXd, rates of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis were similar in pts with/without prior CDK4/6i use. Conclusions: T-DXd treatment for HER2-low mBC in the phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast04 showed consistent efficacy independent of disease burden, prior CDK4/6i treatment, or rapid progression status. ILD is an important identified risk and requires proactive monitoring and management. These data continue to support the use of T-DXd as the new standard of care across subgroups of pts with HER2-low mBC. Editorial Acknowledgment Under guidance of the authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Eileen McIver, PhD, and Soniya Patel, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo. Funding This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca. Table 1. Efficacy by Prior CDK4/6i Treatment in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, HR+ Cohort. Table 2. Efficacy by Disease Burdena in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, ITT. Table 3. Efficacy by Rapid Progressor Statusa in Pts With HER2-Low Breast Cancer, ITT. Citation Format: Nadia Harbeck, Shanu Modi, William Jacot, Toshinari Yamashita, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Maria Vidal, Junji Tsurutani, Naoto T. Ueno, Aleix Prat, Naoki Niikura, Binghe Xu, Hope Rugo, Konstantinos Papazisis, Javier Cortés, Ian Krop, Dhiraj Gambhire, Lotus Yung, Yibin Wang, Jasmeet Singh, David Cameron. Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with HER2-low unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from DESTINY-Breast04 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-01.

Background: Olaparib (O) is approved for the treatment of HER2[-] patients (pts) with early or metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. Nevertheless, there is no evidence that HER2[+] tumors are resistant to PARPi. Preclinical data support that HER2[+] cells are sensitive to PARPi and strongly suggest that PARP inhibition augments the efficacy of trastuzumab (T). To test whether PARPi is synergistic with anti-HER2 therapy, the OPHELIA study has assessed the efficacy and safety of O in combination with T in pts with HER2[+] germinal BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: OPHELIA (NCT03931551) is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial. The study enrolled pts aged ≥18 years diagnosed of HER2[+] ABC with germinal deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had received at least one prior systemic regimen for advanced disease (including a pertuzumab- or trastuzumab emtansine based regimen). Pts received O (300 mg oral, twice daily) plus T (either loading dose of 8 mg/kg IV infusion, and subsequent 3-weekly doses of 6 mg/kg IV infusion; or 600 mg SC injection, on day 1 of every 21-day cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical benefit rate (CBR) for at least 24 weeks as per RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS); and safety and tolerability as per NCI-CTCAE v.5.0. The primary analysis evaluated CBR (H0: ≤5%; H1: ≥30%) based on exact binomial test. Sample size was designed to attain a 90% power at 10% one-sided alpha level. Results: From Mar 25, 2019, through Mar 2, 2022, 5 pts (from a total of 42 pts evaluated) were enrolled at 17 sites in Spain. Median age was 37.0 (range 32–54) years, 1 (20.0%) patient was male, 4 (80.0%) pts carried germinal BRCA2 mutations, 4 (80.0%) pts had received ≥ 3 advanced disease treatments lines, and 4 (80.0%) pts presented ≥ 2 metastatic sites. At data cutoff (Mar 2, 2022), with a median follow-up of 18.7 months (min: 11.7; max: 22.1), 40.0% of pts remained on therapy. CBR at 24 weeks was 80.0% meeting the primary endpoint (4 of 5 pts; 95% CI, 28.4% to 99.5%, p< 0.001). ORR (1 complete and 2 partial responses) was 60.0% (95% CI, 17.4% to 94.7%), and median DoR was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 8.3 months). Two (40.0%) pts had PFS events due to disease progression at 5.2 and 1.2 months, respectively. Rest of pts were treated for 5.5, 11.2, and 19.0 months. There were 2 (40.0%) deaths at 14.0 and 18.5 months. The most common non-hematological treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (G) were fatigue (60.0%; 0% G≥3), nausea (60.0%; 0% G≥3), vomiting (40.0%; 0% G≥3), and back pain (40.0%; 0% G≥3). Anemia (40.0%; 20.0% G≥3) and lymphopenia (40.0%; 20.0% G≥3) were the most frequent hematological TEAEs. One (20.0%) patient discontinued treatment because of a drug-related TEAE (leukopenia). A dose reduction of O was reported in 1 (20.0%) patient. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: HER2 overexpression in germline BRCA-mutated ABC is infrequent. The activity observed in these 5 pts indicates that O+T combination might be of help in this group of pts. We strongly believe that randomized data are not needed, and RWE studies might help us to understand the real activity of this combination. Toxicity was as expected. Citation Format: José E. Alés-Martínez, Judith Balmaña, Pedro Sánchez-Rovira, Francisco Javier Salvador Bofill, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Isabel Pimentel, Serafin Morales Murillo, Adela Fernández, Ainhara Lahuerta Martínez, Neus Ferrer, Pilar Zamora, Begoña Bermejo, Tamara Díaz-Redondo, María Helena Lopez-Ceballos, María Galán, Andrea Malfettone, Laura Calabuig, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, José Manuel Pérez-García, Javier Cortés, Antonio Llombart-Cussac. Olaparib plus Trastuzumab in HER2[+] BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: The OPHELIA Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-29.

Introduction: PIK3CA mutations, seen in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC), are associated with treatment (Tx) resistance and shorter survival. Alpelisib (ALP) is an α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader indicated for treating this population in combination with fulvestrant (FUL) after endocrine therapy (ET). Previous results from the SOLAR-1 study showed that progression-free survival (PFS) ≥18 mo is achievable for pts treated with ALP on/after prior Tx with aromatase inhibitor (AI). Here, we analyze pts from BYLieve study Cohort A who achieved long-term (LT) and very-long-term (VLT) disease control with ALP + FUL after prior Tx with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) and AI. Methods: BYLieve was a Phase II, nonrandomized, open-label, 3-cohort study of ALP + ET in pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2– ABC whose disease progressed on/after prior CDK4/6i. In Cohort A, median (m) PFS was 7.26 mo. LT disease control was defined as ≥12 mo PFS and VLT disease control as ≥18 mo PFS. Pts with < 12 mo PFS were defined as non-LT. Baseline characteristics are summarized by duration of disease control. Incidence rate (IR) per 100 patient-treatment years (PTY) was calculated to assess exposure-adjusted adverse events (AE). To assess tumor complexity in LT/VLT pts, median circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction, chromosome (chr) 8/11 amplification, and ESR1 mutations were determined by next-generation sequencing. Results: In BYLieve Cohort A, 31 of 121 pts (25.6%) achieved LT disease control with an mPFS of 24.8 mo (95% CI 18.2 mo to not estimable [NE]) and 20 of 121 pts (16.5%) achieved VLT disease control (mPFS NE; 95% CI 22.1 mo to NE). Pts with LT/VLT disease control had lower BMI and ECOG score, longer time from initial diagnosis to first recurrence/relapse, more frequent bone-only lesions, and fewer liver metastases than non-LT pts (Table). Median ALP relative dose intensity was 86.7%, 91.7%, 85.0%, and 85.1% for all Cohort A pts (n=127), non-LT (n=96), LT (n=31), and VLT disease control (n=20), respectively, whereas median ALP exposure was 5.13 mo, 3.61 mo, 21.29 mo, and 25.25 mo respectively. The IRs per 100 PTY of diarrhea, hyperglycemia, and rash were lower in LT (IR 128.4, n=24; IR 78.0, n=20; IR 21.6, n=10 respectively) and VLT (IR 93.5, n=15; IR 51.2, n=11; IR 24.9, n=8 respectively) pts than non-LT pts (IR 250.5, n=57; IR 251.5, n=56; IR 85.4, n=30 respectively). In LT and VLT pts ctDNA fraction was 2% and 5% respectively, whereas ctDNA fraction in non-LT pts was 14%. Incidence of chr 8/11 amplification was 10% in both LT and VLT pts and 20% in non-LT pts; incidence of ESR1 mutations was 26%, 25%, and 27% in LT, VLT, and non-LT pts respectively. Conclusions: In pts with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2– ABC treated with ALP + FUL after CDK4/6i, LT and VLT disease control was observed in 25.6% and 16.5% of patients, respectively. Visceral disease, development of AEs, and ESR1 mutations did not preclude LT/VLT disease control. These data confirm that targeting the PIK3CA driver mutation with ALP + FUL post-CDK4/6i Tx may lead to LT disease control. Table Baseline characteristics in BYLieve Cohort A overall and by duration of disease control Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Stephen K. Chia, Javier Cortés, Giuseppe Curigliano, Patrick Neven, Rebecca Dent, Sara Tolaney, Eva Ciruelos, Yeon H. Park, Estelle Roux, Yogesh Chattar, Heather Patino, Murat Akdere, Dejan Juric. PD13-06 Long-Term and Very-Long-Term Disease Control in Patients From BYLieve Study Cohort A With PIK3CA-Mutant, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-06.

Background An improvement in progression-free survival was shown with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in the progression-free survival interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial. The aim of DESTINY-Breast03 was to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine. Methods This open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial was done in 169 study centres in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and South America. Eligible patients were aged 18 or older, had HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5 center dot 4 mg/kg or trastuzumab emtansine 3 center dot 6 mg/kg, both administered by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by hormone receptor status, previous treatment with pertuzumab, and history of visceral disease, and was managed through an interactive web-based system. Within each stratum, balanced block randomisation was used with a block size of four. Patients and investigators were not masked to the treatment received. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by blinded independent central review. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival and this prespecified second overall survival interim analysis reports updated overall survival, efficacy, and safety results. Efficacy analyses were performed using the full analysis set. Safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03529110. Findings Between July 20, 2018, and June 23, 2020, 699 patients were screened for eligibility, 524 of whom were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=261) or trastuzumab emtansine (n=263). Median duration of study follow-up was 28 center dot 4 months (IQR 22 center dot 1-32 center dot 9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 26 center dot 5 months (14 center dot 5-31 center dot 3) with trastuzumab emtansine. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 28 center dot 8 months (95% CI 22 center dot 4-37 center dot 9) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 6 center dot 8 months (5 center dot 6-8 center dot 2) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio [HR] 0 center dot 33 [95% CI 0 center dot 26-0 center dot 43]; nominal p

Background: Breast cancer (BC) with low-level HER2 expression (HER2-low) is defined by an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification or excess HER2 gene copy number, as measured by in situ hybridization (ISH). This represents approximately half of patients with BC overall (estimated as 55% for hormone-receptor positive [HR+] BC and 38% for triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]; Scott, ASCO, 2021). Some data suggest that patients with HER2-low BC may respond differently to treatment than those whose BC has no HER2 expression (HER2-0). In this post hoc unplanned analysis, we analyzed data from two pivotal phase 3 studies (Studies 305 and 301) comparing eribulin with other chemotherapeutic agents (treatment of physician’s choice and capecitabine, respectively [“control”]) in patients with both HER2-low and HER2-0 MBC. Methods: Patients with MBC, 2–5 (Study 305) or < 2 (Study 301) prior lines of chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease, and who had received an anthracycline and a taxane, were analyzed. HER2-expression status was determined by IHC and/or ISH assays. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method adjusted by study; comparisons of PFS and OS between treatment groups were performed using stratified (by prior capecitabine use, geographic region, and study) log-rank tests. Hazard ratios were estimated by a stratified Cox model. For each study, median PFS and OS were also calculated for HR+ and TNBC subgroups. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between treatment groups among patients with HER2-low (n=427) and HER2-0 (n=824) BC. Patients with HER2-low or HER2-0 BC showed trends toward benefit with eribulin treatment. In patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 BC, median OS was longer with eribulin vs control (15.1 vs 12.0 months and 15.2 vs 12.5 months, respectively); median PFS by independent imaging review (IIR) was also longer with eribulin vs control (4.0 vs 3.1 months and 3.9 vs 3.1 months, respectively). Objective response rate (ORR) by IIR was also higher with eribulin vs control in patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 BC (13.7% vs 9.2% and 10.2% vs 7.4%, respectively). In a separate analysis, median OS was longer with eribulin vs capecitabine in patients with TNBC and HER2-low and HER2-0 (15.4 vs 10.3 months and 14.4 vs 8.9 months, respectively). Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, treatment with eribulin demonstrated trends toward improved OS, PFS, and ORR compared with chemotherapy controls in patients with HER2-low or HER2-0 MBC. Funding source: This trial was sponsored by Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA. Medical writing support was provided by Oxford PharmaGenesis Inc., Newtown, PA, USA, and was funded by Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA. Citation Format: Chris Twelves, Peter A. Kaufman, Ahmad Awada, Seock-Ah Im, Bagrat Lalayan, Ran Xie, Linda T. Vahdat, Javier Cortés. Efficacy of eribulin mesylate in HER2-low and HER2-0 metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Results from an analysis of two phase 3 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-02.

Introduction: Despite recent treatment advances, the prognosis for patients diagnosed with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains poor. Single-agent chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for metastatic TNBC for many years, with very limited treatment options for patients who are not candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; consequently, there remains an urgent unmet need. Trophoblast cell surface protein 2 (TROP2) is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed on various solid tumors, including breast. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to an exatecan derivative (DXd) – a highly potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload – via a stable, tumor-selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd has previously been evaluated in TROPION-PanTumor01 (NCT03401385) – an ongoing Phase I clinical trial across multiple advanced solid tumors, including heavily-pretreated, metastatic TNBC. As of the July 30, 2021 cut-off date, the objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 34% (15/44) in all patients with TNBC and 52% (14/27) in those patients treatment-naïve to topoisomerase I inhibitor-based ADC therapies, with measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) at baseline. Furthermore, a manageable safety profile was reported, with no new safety signals identified; low grade nausea and stomatitis were most frequent, with neutropenia and diarrhea being uncommon. The aim of the phase 3 TROPION-Breast02 trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in patients with TNBC who are not candidates for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. Methods: TROPION-Breast02 (NCT05374512) is an ongoing Phase 3, open-label, randomized study of Dato-DXd versus ICC in first-line treatment of patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC. Approximately 600 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg IV every three weeks or ICC (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, capecitabine, or eribulin mesylate). Patients ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed TNBC who have not received prior chemotherapy or targeted systemic therapy for metastatic or locally recurrent inoperable disease are eligible for inclusion. Patients are also required to have an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 and be eligible for treatment with one of the ICC options per investigator assessment. Patients must have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1 not previously irradiated, along with a formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor sample available. Those with a previously treated neoplastic spinal cord compression or clinically inactive brain metastases can be included. Key exclusion criteria are history of another primary malignancy; persistent toxicity from previous anti-cancer treatments; uncontrolled infections; current/prior interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis or clinically severe pulmonary function compromise; clinically significant corneal disease; and prior treatment with topoisomerase I inhibitors, TROP2-targeted therapy, or the same chemotherapy agent chosen for on-study ICC. The dual primary endpoints are progression free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by BICR, and OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, PFS by investigator assessment, time to deterioration for patient-reported outcomes, time to first subsequent therapy, time to second subsequent therapy, time to second progression or death, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of Dato-DXd, and safety. Recruitment for this study is ongoing as of June 2022. Citation Format: Rebecca Dent, David W. Cescon, Thomas Bachelot, Kyung Hae Jung, Zhi-Ming Shao, Shigehira Saji, Tiffany A. Traina, Petra Vuković, Darlington Mapiye, Micah Maxwell, Peter Schmid, Javier Cortés. TROPION-Breast02: Phase 3, open-label, randomized study of first-line datopotamab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic TNBC who are not candidates for anti-PD-(L)1 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-05.

Several antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been recently approved to treat solid tumours. Since ADCs seem to have activity in multiple malignancies sharing the expression of a specific antigen, they may be mirroring the experience of histology-agnostic-targeted treatments. So, the possibility to interpret the activity of some ADCs across different cancer types in a biomarker-driven perspective arises. However, relevant biological, methodological, and regulatory challenges should be highlighted and addressed, in order to grant ADCs biomarker-driven regulatory approvals in the next future. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities posed by the pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumours. In particular, we provide an overview about technological and manufacturing advancements; we offer up-to-date highlights of the current evidence from clinical trials investigating ADCs in solid tumours; we discuss the need for the identification of optimal predictive biomarkers, as well as major methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations for a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach.

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer account for approximately 15% to 20% of all breast cancers and represent one of the most aggressive breast cancer subtypes. Survival rates of patients with metastatic disease have improved dramatically and progressively. Many new agents have been developed, and long-term follow-up from trials of anti-HER2 agents has shown long-term responses. The availability of novel, highly active anti-HER2 treatments, together with the ongoing development of promising diagnostic tools, will offer the unprecedented opportunity to raise cure rates. Our ultimate goal is to tailor treatment intensity to disease and patient characteristics, hopefully increasing the fraction of cured patients while minimizing the risk for overtreatment. If conducted rationally and carefully, this plan has the potential to break a decades-long paradigm, leading to a new, precise era of treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high clinical need for novel treatments; however, historically, studies have often excluded these patients. Although the BEACON study did not meet its primary end point, treatment with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician’s choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for the prespecified patient subgroup with preexisting, pretreated, and nonprogressive BM. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with BM treated with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician’s choice in a confirmatory trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (ATTAIN) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a history of stable pretreated BM who experienced disease progression while receiving chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The trial took place at 47 sites in 10 countries, and patients were enrolled between March 7, 2017, and November 6, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive etirinotecan pegol, 145 mg/m(2), every 21 days or chemotherapy (eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was OS. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and the clinical benefit rate. RESULTS: A total of 178 female patients (9 [5.1%] Asian, 8 [4.5%] Black or African American, and 123 [69.1] White individuals) were randomized to receive treatment with etirinotecan pegol (92 [51.7%]; median [range] age, 53 [27-79] years) or chemotherapy (86 [48.3%]; median [range] age, 52 [24-77] years). Median OS was similar in both groups (etirinotecan pegol, 7.8 months; chemotherapy, 7.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60). Median progression-free survival for non–central nervous system metastases per blinded independent central review for etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy was 2.8 and 1.9 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.16; P = .18) and 3.9 vs 3.3 months, respectively, for central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05; P = .07). Safety profiles between the groups were largely comparable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of the ATTAIN randomized clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between treatment with etirinotecan pegol and chemotherapy in patients with BM. However, this study represents one of the largest published trials dedicated to patients with breast cancer and BM and may help to inform further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915744

PDF file - 58K

PDF file - 301K, Combined PIK3CA siRNA and PARP suppression in TNBC cell lines

PDF file - 3.4MB, Concordance in ER, PR, HER2, and PTEN expression between original patient tumors and the derived tumor grafts

PDF file - 195K, PI3K regulates BRCA expression

PDF file - 208K, PI3K blockade suppresses BRCA1/2 transcription

PDF file - 162K, Western blot of cell lysates from MDA-MB-468 or PDC44 cells treated with 750nM and 500nM BKM120 respectively for 4 days using the indicated antibodies

PDF file - 190K, ERK and ETS1 downregulate BRCA1/2 expression

PDF file - 139K, Common BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoter putative transcription factors analysis

Supplementary Figure from Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance

Supplementary Table S1. Selection Criteria; Supplementary Table S2. Recruiting Sites, Principal Investigators, and Patient Numbers; Supplementary Table S3. Study Members; Supplementary Table S4. List of antibodies used for immunohistochemistry analysis; Supplementary Table S5. Cutoff values for the quantitative assessment of biomarkers by immunohistochemistry; Supplementary Table S6. The 77-gene panel by the AVENIO ctDNA Expanded Kit used for targeted NGS on plasma samples; Supplementary Table S7. Representativeness of study participants; Supplementary Table S8. Association of baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics of trial participants included in the efficacy analysis with clinical benefit; Supplementary Table S9. Relative dose intensity and drug discontinuation; Supplementary Table S10. All causality AEs according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0.3 occurring in at least 5% of the patients; Supplementary Table S11. Adverse events of special interest according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0.3; Supplementary Table S12. Baseline clinical and pathologic characteristics of trial participants included in the retinoblastoma and signature subsets; Supplementary Table S13. Tumor best response according to RECIST version 1.1 of trial participants included in the retinoblastoma and signature subsets; Supplementary Table S14. Association of biomarkers and composite signatures with clinical benefit.

Supplementary Data from Identification of a Molecularly-Defined Subset of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Models that Respond to WEE1 or ATR Inhibition, Overcoming PARP Inhibitor Resistance

Summary of all adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0.3.

Purpose:To assess the efficacy and exploratory biomarkers of continuing palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) beyond progression on prior palbociclib-based regimen in patients with hormone receptor–positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC).Patients and Methods:The multicenter, open-label, phase II BioPER trial included women who had experienced a progressive disease (PD) after having achieved clinical benefit on the immediately prior palbociclib plus ET regimen. Palbociclib (125 mg, 100 mg, or 75 mg daily orally for 3 weeks and 1 week off as per prior palbociclib-based regimen) plus ET of physician's choice were administered in 4-week cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Coprimary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR) and percentage of tumors with baseline loss of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein expression. Additional endpoints included safety and biomarker analysis.Results:Among 33 patients enrolled, CBR was 34.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.6–53.2; P < 0.001] and 13.0% of tumors (95% CI, 5.2–27.5) showed loss of Rb protein expression, meeting both coprimary endpoints. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.8–6.7). No new safety signals were reported. A signature that included baseline mediators of therapeutic resistance to palbociclib and ET (low Rb score, high cyclin E1 score, ESR1 mutation) was independently associated with shorter median progression-free survival (HR, 22.0; 95% CI, 1.71–282.9; P = 0.018).Conclusions:Maintaining palbociclib after progression on prior palbociclib-based regimen seems to be a reasonable, investigational approach for selected patients. A composite biomarker signature predicts a subset of patients who may not derive a greater benefit from palbociclib rechallenge, warranting further validation in larger randomized controlled trials.

Purpose:PARP inhibitors (PARPi) induce synthetic lethality in homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient tumors and are used to treat breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancers. Multiple PARPi resistance mechanisms exist, most resulting in restoration of HRR and protection of stalled replication forks. ATR inhibition was highlighted as a unique approach to reverse both aspects of resistance. Recently, however, a PARPi/WEE1 inhibitor (WEE1i) combination demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity associated with the induction of replication stress, suggesting another approach to tackling PARPi resistance.Experimental Design:We analyzed breast and ovarian patient-derived xenoimplant models resistant to PARPi to quantify WEE1i and ATR inhibitor (ATRi) responses as single agents and in combination with PARPi. Biomarker analysis was conducted at the genetic and protein level. Metabolite analysis by mass spectrometry and nucleoside rescue experiments ex vivo were also conducted in patient-derived models.Results:Although WEE1i response was linked to markers of replication stress, including STK11/RB1 and phospho-RPA, ATRi response associated with ATM mutation. When combined with olaparib, WEE1i could be differentiated from the ATRi/olaparib combination, providing distinct therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance by targeting the replication stress response. Mechanistically, WEE1i sensitivity was associated with shortage of the dNTP pool and a concomitant increase in replication stress.Conclusions:Targeting the replication stress response is a valid therapeutic option to overcome PARPi resistance including tumors without an underlying HRR deficiency. These preclinical insights are now being tested in several clinical trials where the PARPi is administered with either the WEE1i or the ATRi.

Background Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown durable antitumor activity in pretreated patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC), but its efficacy has not yet been evaluated in patients with active brain metastases (BMs). DEBBRAH aims to assess T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low ABC and central nervous system involvement. Methods This ongoing, five-cohort, phase II study (NCT04420598) enrolled patients with pretreated HER2-positive or HER2-low ABC with stable, untreated, or progressing BMs, and/or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Here, we report findings from HER2-positive ABC patients with non-progressing BMs after local therapy (n = 8; cohort 1), asymptomatic untreated BMs (n = 4; cohort 2), or progressing BMs after local therapy (n = 9; cohort 3). Patients received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously once every 21 days. The primary endpoint was 16-week progression-free survival (PFS) for cohort 1 and intracranial objective response rate (ORR-IC) for cohorts 2 and 3. Results As of October 20, 2021, 21 patients received T-DXd. In cohort 1, 16-week PFS rate was 87.5% (95%CI, 47.3-99.7; P < .001). ORR-IC was 50.0% (95%CI, 6.7-93.2) in cohort 2 and 44.4% (95%CI, 13.7-78.8; P < .001) in cohort 3. Overall, the ORR-IC in patients with active BMs was 46.2% (95%CI, 19.2-74.9). Among patients with measurable intracranial or extracranial lesions at baseline, the ORR was 66.7% (12 out of 18 patients; 95%CI, 41.0-86.7), 80.0% (95%CI, 28.4-99.5) in cohort 1, 50.0% (95%CI, 6.7-93.2) in cohort 2, and 66.7% (95%CI, 29.9-92.5) in cohort 3. All responders had partial responses. The most common adverse events included fatigue (52.4%; 4.8% grade ≥3), nausea (42.9%; 0% grade ≥3), neutropenia (28.6%; 19% grade ≥3), and constipation (28.6%; 0% grade ≥3). Two (9.5%) patients suffered grade 1 interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis. Conclusions T-DXd showed intracranial activity with manageable toxicity and maintained the quality of life in pretreated HER2-positive ABC patients with stable, untreated, or progressing BMs. Further studies are needed to validate these results in larger cohorts.

Trastuzumab emtansine is the current standard treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer whose disease progresses after treatment with a combination of anti-HER2 antibodies and a taxane.We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (a HER2 antibody-drug conjugate) with those of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. The primary end point was progression-free survival (as determined by blinded independent central review); secondary end points included overall survival, objective response, and safety.Among 524 randomly assigned patients, the percentage of those who were alive without disease progression at 12 months was 75.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.8 to 80.7) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 34.1% (95% CI, 27.7 to 40.5) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37; P0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive at 12 months was 94.1% (95% CI, 90.3 to 96.4) with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 85.9% (95% CI, 80.9 to 89.7) with trastuzumab emtansine (hazard ratio for death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86; prespecified significance boundary not reached). An overall response (a complete or partial response) occurred in 79.7% (95% CI, 74.3 to 84.4) of the patients who received trastuzumab deruxtecan and in 34.2% (95% CI, 28.5 to 40.3) of those who received trastuzumab emtansine. The incidence of drug-related adverse events of any grade was 98.1% with trastuzumab deruxtecan and 86.6% with trastuzumab emtansine, and the incidence of drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 45.1% and 39.8%, respectively. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 10.5% of the patients in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and in 1.9% of those in the trastuzumab emtansine group; none of these events were of grade 4 or 5.Among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane, the risk of disease progression or death was lower among those who received trastuzumab deruxtecan than among those who received trastuzumab emtansine. Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan was associated with interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; DESTINY-Breast03 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03529110.).

Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG is FDA approved for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting). The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts treated in second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit of SG over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (median PFS: 4.8 vs 1.7 months, HR 0.43, P Citation Format: Javier Cortés, Aditya Bardia, Delphine Loirat, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Sagar Sardesai, Kevin M Kalinsky, Tiffany Traina, Erika Hamilton, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A. Carey, Martine Piccart, Sibylle Loibl, Hope S. Rugo, Yanni Zhu, See Phan, Luca Gianni. Post-progression therapy outcomes in patients (pts) from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-15.

Background: The introduction of trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) has drastically improved clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with HER2-positive early breast cancer, allowing to explore chemotherapy-sparing approaches in this population. PHERGain trial is evaluating the efficacy of dual HER2-blockade with HP as both neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment using an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-based and a pathological response-adapted strategy [Pérez-García JM et al., Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:858-871]. PHERGain-2 study is an additional step forward and aims to assess the feasibility of chemotherapy de-escalation with neoadjuvant HP followed by adjuvant HP or T-DM1 using a pathological response-adapted strategy in low-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer pts. Trial Design: PHERGain-2 is a multicenter, open-label, non-comparative, phase 2 trial. Eligible participants are patients aged ≥18 years with previously untreated, centrally confirmed, HER2-positive (immunohistochemical score 3+), invasive, node-negative breast cancer (>0.5 and Citation Format: José Manuel Pérez-García, Ángel Guerrero-Zotano, Jacques Medioni, Andreas Schneeweiss, Marco Colleoni, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Andrea Malfettone, Javier Cortés, Antonio Llombart-Cussac. A phase 2 study of chemotherapy de-escalation using a pathological response-guided strategy in patients with HER2-positive, low-risk early breast cancer: PHERGain-2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-12-07.

Promover y proteger los derechos humanos de las personas vulnerables, no debe ser reducido a intereses de tipo particular o político, sino que debe obligar al Estado a proporcionar las medidas para garantizar el acceso a ese derecho, utilizando las herramientas y estándares internacionales. En la actualidad, ante la crisis de salud que enfrenta la humanidad, estamos en una posibilidad de colisión y discriminación de dos derechos fundamentales, por un lado la educación y por otro, la salud, la decisión no es sencilla, ya que; la restricción de uno u otro, puede conducir a la discriminación, creando una desigualdad en la población de forma desproporcionada, lo cual es algo que no puede permitirse, ni tolerarse en estos tiempos de crisis.

En este estudio se describe un proceso de intervención mediante la Investigación Acción Participativa con un grupo de jóvenes con discapacidad intelectual y sus familias, en el contexto de un programa de formación sociolaboral en la Universidad de Jaén. El objetivo principal de la investigación consiste en explorar las temáticas relacionadas con el continuo sobreprotección-autonomía desde la perspectiva de los y las participantes. Mediante la utilización de actividades grupales y/o artísticas se promovió la discusión que llevó a la definición de la terminología y sus implicaciones en la vida diaria. El proceso de investigación supuso que familiares y alumnado trabajaran de forma separada pero paralela, con el objetivo de crear oportunidades para mejorar el entendimiento mutuo mediante la reflexión continua. Los principales ejes temáticos identificados por los y las participantes con discapacidad intelectual fueron: libertad, confianza por parte de sus familias, autonomía, libre elección de prendas e independencia. A su vez, las familias identificaron como dimensiones a trabajar: preparación para afrontar nuevas circunstancias, sobreprotección, sexualidad, consumos y objetivos vitales difíciles de realizar. Pudieron expresar sus opiniones de manera libre, segura y de forma diversa. El proceso participativo permitió un diálogo constructivo acerca de temas considerados tabú, tales como la sexualidad y la vida independiente

Supplementary Figures 1-20

Supplementary material

Supplementary Tables