Search

Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of midline laparotomy and enterostomal creation and is associated with high morbidity, decreased quality of life, and high costs. The International Symposium on Incisional Hernia Prevention was held October 19 –20, 2017, at the InterContinental Hotel in San Francisco, CA, hosted by the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco. One hundred and three attendees included general and plastic surgeons from 9 countries, including principal participants for several of the seminal studies in the field. Over the course of the 2-day meeting, there were 38 oral presentations, 3 keynote lectures, and 2 panel discussions. The Symposium was a combination of new information but also a comprehensive review of the existing data so as to assess the current state of the field and to set the stage for future research. Further, the Symposium sought to increase awareness and thus emphasize the importance of preventing the formation of incisional and enterostomal hernias. pre-print 443 KB

Background No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for ‘loss of domain’ (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdominal wall surgeons. Methods A Delphi study involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons was performed. Four written and two volumetric definitions of LOD were identified via systematic review. Panelists completed a questionnaire that suggested these definitions as standardized definitions of LOD. Consensus on a preferred term was pre-defined as achieved when selected by ≥80% of panelists. Terms scoring Results Voting commenced August 2018 and was completed in January 2019. Written definition: During Round 1, two definitions were removed and seven new definitions were suggested, leaving nine definitions for consideration. For Round 2, panelists were asked to select all appealing definitions. Thereafter, common concepts were identified during analysis, from which the facilitators advanced a new written definition. This received 100% agreement in Round 3. Volumetric definition: Initially, panelists were evenly split, but consensus for the Sabbagh method was achieved. Panelists could not reach consensus regarding a threshold LOD value that would preclude surgery. Conclusions Consensus for written and volumetric definitions of LOD was achieved from 20 internationally recognized AWR surgeons. Adoption of these definitions will help standardize the use of LOD for both clinical and academic activities.

Nomenclature for mesh insertion during ventral hernia repair is inconsistent and confusing. Several terms, including 'inlay', 'sublay' and 'underlay', can refer to the same anatomical planes in the indexed literature. This frustrates comparisons of surgical practice and may invalidate meta-analyses comparing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish an international classification of abdominal wall planes.A Delphi study was conducted involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall surgeons. Different terms describing anterior abdominal wall planes were identified via literature review and expert consensus. The initial list comprised 59 possible terms. Panellists completed a questionnaire that suggested a list of options for individual abdominal wall planes. Consensus on a term was predefined as occurring if selected by at least 80 per cent of panellists. Terms scoring less than 20 per cent were removed.Voting started August 2018 and was completed by January 2019. In round 1, 43 terms (73 per cent) were selected by less than 20 per cent of panellists and 37 new terms were suggested, leaving 53 terms for round 2. Four planes reached consensus in round 2, with the terms 'onlay', 'inlay', 'preperitoneal' and 'intraperitoneal'. Thirty-five terms (66 per cent) were selected by less than 20 per cent of panellists and were removed. After round 3, consensus was achieved for 'anterectus', 'interoblique', 'retro-oblique' and 'retromuscular'. Default consensus was achieved for the 'retrorectus' and 'transversalis fascial' planes.Consensus concerning abdominal wall planes was agreed by 20 internationally recognized surgeons. Adoption should improve communication and comparison among surgeons and research studies.La nomenclatura de la inserción de una malla para la reparación de una hernia incisional ventral (ventral hernia, VH) es inconsistente y confusa. En la literatura indexada se usan varios términos, tales como ‘inlay’, ‘sublay’, y ‘underlay’ que pueden referirse a los mismos planos anatómicos. Este hecho frustra las comparaciones de técnicas quirúrgicas e invalida los metaanálisis que comparan resultados quirúrgicos en función del plano de inserción de la malla. En consecuencia, el objetivo de este estudio fue establecer una clasificación internacional de los planos de la pared abdominal (International Classification of Abdominal Wall Planes, ICAP). MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio Delphi, en el que participaron 20 cirujanos de pared abdominal reconocidos internacionalmente. Se identificaron diferentes términos que describían los planos de la pared abdominal anterior mediante la revisión de la literatura y el consenso de expertos. La lista inicial incluía 59 términos posibles. Los panelistas completaron un cuestionario que sugería una lista de opciones para los planos individuales de la pared abdominal. El consenso sobre un término fue predefinido cuando dicho término había sido seleccionado por ≥ 80% de panelistas. Se eliminaron los términos con una puntuación 20%.La votación comenzó en agosto de 2018 y se completó en enero de 2019. Durante la Ronda 1, 43 (73%) términos fueron seleccionados por 20% de los panelistas y se sugirieron 37 términos nuevos, dejando 53 términos para la Ronda 2. Cuatro planos alcanzaron un consenso en la Ronda 2 con los términos ‘onlay’, ‘inlay’, ‘pre-peritoneal’ e ‘intra-peritoneal’. Treinta y cinco (66%) términos fueron seleccionados por 20% de los panelistas y fueron eliminados. Después de la Ronda 3, se logró un consenso para ‘anterectus’ (ante-recto), ‘interoblique’ (inter-oblicuo), ‘retrooblique’ (retro-oblicuo) y ‘retromuscular’. Se alcanzó un consenso por defecto para los planos ‘retrorectus’ (retro-recto) y ‘transversalis fascial’ (fascial transverso). CONCLUSIÓN: La ICAP ha sido desarrollada por el consenso de 20 cirujanos reconocidos internacionalmente. Su implementación debería mejorar la comunicación y la comparación entre cirujanos y estudios de investigación.

BACKGROUND Perioperative hypothermia during laparoscopy for bowel resection is a risk factor for postoperative medical complications and surgical wound infections. Despite various warming methods used during surgery, a significant number of patients experience perioperative hypothermia. Use of dry, unwarmed insufflation carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic procedures may contribute to this problem. Evidence exists that the HumiGard device, which humidifies and heats CO2 for insufflation, can reduce the risk of perioperative hypothermia. OBJECTIVE The aim is to determine if insufflation with warmed, humidified CO2 using the HumiGard device, alongside standard perioperative warming techniques, can improve patient recovery, including pain, surgical site infections, complications, and the use of analgesia compared with standard care alone. METHODS The study is a multicenter, randomized, blinded (patient, surgeon, and assessor), sham device-controlled, parallel group-controlled trial of 232 patients. The study aims to recruit patients undergoing elective laparoscopic, segmental, or total colectomy. Patients will be randomized to receive HumiGard plus standard care or standard care alone (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of recovery, measured by the validated QoR-40 (quality of recovery) questionnaire, from baseline to postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, the incidence of hypothermia, and the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS The information gathered during a small-scale service evaluation at a single hospital was used to inform this study protocol. Before applying for a grant for this full randomized controlled trial, the authors will conduct a feasibility study of 40 patients to ensure that the protocol is feasible and to inform our sample size calculation. CONCLUSIONS The randomized controlled trial is designed to provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of the HumiGard device in potentially reducing the risk of perioperative hypothermia in patients scheduled for laparoscopic colectomy. The results will be used to improve the maintenance of adequate patient body temperature during surgery.

The formation of an ileostomy or colostomy may provide therapeutic benefits in patients with abdominal pathology, complicated pelvic infections, faecal incontinence, rectovaginal fistula, perianal sepsis, perianal Crohn’s disease (CD), radiation proctitis, advanced colorectal cancers or J-pouch-related complications (Brand and Dujovny, Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:5–16, 2008). The laparoscopic approach is a safe and effective option with the advantage of reduced pain, quicker recovery time, shorter hospital stay and improved cosmesis (Shin and Rafferty, Clin Colon Rectal Surg 23:42–50, 2010). Sound surgical technique is needed when creating ostomies to avoid the complications that a poorly constructed stoma can have on a patient’s quality of life (Dabirian et al., Patient Prefer Adherence 5:1–5, 2011; Krstic et al., World J Emerg Surg 9:52, 2014). The main indications for faecal diversion can be broadly divided into elective and emergency procedures, which may be intended to be temporary and reversible or to be permanent depending upon the reason for stoma formation.

The ideal treatment for patients who suffer from pilonidal sinus disease should lead to a cure with a rapid recovery period allowing a return to normal daily activities, with a low level of associated morbidity. A variety of different surgical techniques have been described for the primary treatment of pilonidal sinus disease and current practice remains variable and contentious. Whilst some management options have improved outcomes for some patients, the complications of surgery, particularly related to wound healing, often remain worse than the primary disease. This clinical review aims to provide an update on the management options to guide clinicians involved in the care of patients who suffer from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.

Aim There is a requirement of an expansive and up to date review of surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that can dovetail with the medical guidelines produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology. Methods Surgeons who are members of the ACPGBI with a recognised interest in IBD were invited to contribute various sections of the guidelines. They were directed to produce a procedure based document using literature searches that were systematic, comprehensible, transparent and reproducible. Levels of evidence were graded. An editorial board was convened to ensure consistency of style, presentation and quality. Each author was asked to provide a set of recommendations which were evidence based and unambiguous. These recommendations were submitted to the whole guideline group and scored. They were then refined and submitted to a second vote. Only those that achieved >80% consensus at level 5 (strongly agree) or level 4 (agree) after 2 votes were included in the guidelines. Results All aspects of surgical care for IBD have been included along with 157 recommendations for management. Conclusion These guidelines provide an up to date and evidence based summary of the current surgical knowledge in the management of IBD and will serve as a useful practical text for clinicians performing this type of surgery.

Introduction Rectal cancer affects more than 600 patients per year in Wales, with a 5-year survival rate of around 60%. A recent report demonstrated that 19% of patients with bowel cancer had difficulty controlling their bowels after surgery, and these patients were twice as likely to report lower quality of life than those who had control. Nearly all patients will experience bowel dysfunction initially following surgery and up to 25% will experience severe bowel dysfunction on a long-term basis. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of introducing a simple intervention in an attempt to improve bowel function following surgery for rectal cancer. We propose the introduction of an educational session from specialist nurses and physiotherapists prior to surgery and a subsequent physiotherapy programme for 3 months to teach patients how to strengthen their pelvic floor. Methods and analysis All patients with rectal cancer planned to receive an anterior resection will be approached for the study. The study will take place in three centres over 12 months, and we expect to recruit 40 patients. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of eligible patients approached who consent to and attend the educational session. The secondary outcomes include patient compliance to the pelvic floor rehabilitation programme (assessed by patient paper or electronic diary), the acceptability of the intervention to the patient (assessed using qualitative interviews) and preoperative and postoperative pelvic floor tone (assessed using the Oxford Grading System and the International Continence Society Grading System), patient bowel function and patient quality of life (assessed using validated questionnaires). Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted. This feasibility study is in progress. If patients find the intervention acceptable, the next stage would be a trial comparing outcomes after anterior resection in those who have and do not have physiotherapy. Trial registration number ISRCTN77383505; Pre-results.

Aim Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) following rectal cancer surgery impairs the patient's quality of life (QoL). Rectal Irrigation has been demonstrated to be effective for anterior resection syndrome but many surgeons do not suggest it as a treatment. This feasibility study aimed to explore treatment acceptability and the benefit of rectal irrigation in patients who developed LARS following an anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods This was a qualitative study, involving semi-structured interviews. Twenty-one patients diagnosed with LARS following anterior resection for rectal cancer in a single tertiary centre were offered rectal irrigation as a treatment option. Qualitative interviews (n=17) were conducted at baseline to explore patient reported impact of LARS on QoL, treatment acceptability and factors influencing the decision to accept/decline treatment. Follow up interviews were carried out at six months for the treatment group only (n=12), to assess its practicality and impact on QoL. Results Qualitative interview findings suggest rectal irrigation is an acceptable method of treatment for LARS. Participants who perceived their symptoms to be more severe or poorly controlled were most likely to consider rectal irrigation as a treatment option. The patients who completed treatment reported improvements in their QoL, the ability to control the time of defaecation being the key benefit Conclusion Clinicians should consider offering rectal irrigation as a treatment option to patients presenting with bowel dysfunction following anterior resection as it can improve symptoms. Patients who perceive that their symptoms are severe are more likely to consider treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Background The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase is an ex vivo porcine simulator for polypectomy training. Objective To establish whether this model has construct and concurrent validity. Design Prospective, cross-sectional study. Setting Endoscopic training center. Participants Twenty novice (N), 20 intermediate (I), 20 advanced (Ad), and 20 expert (E) colonoscopists. Intervention A simulated polypectomy task aimed at removing 2 polyps; A (simple), B (complex). Main Outcome Measurements Two accredited colonoscopists, blinded to group allocation, scored performances according to Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment parameters. Group performances were compared. Real-life DOPyS scores were correlated to simulator DOPyS results. Results Median overall DOPyS scores for novices were 1.00 (1.00-1.87) for A and 0.50 (0.00-1.00) for B (A vs B; P < .01). Intermediates scored 2.50 (2.00-2.88) for A and 2.00 (1.13-2.50) for B (A vs B; P = .03). The advanced group scored 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for A and 2.50 (2.00-3.00) for B (A vs B; P = .01). Experts scored 3.00 (3.00-3.88) for A and 3.00 (2.50-3.50) for B (A vs B; P = .47). Intergroup comparisons for A were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P < .01, I vs E; P < .01, and Ad vs E; P = .46. Intergroup comparisons for B were, N vs I; P < .01, N vs Ad; P < .01, N vs E; P < .01, I vs Ad; P = .03, I vs E; P

Background Perioperative hypothermia during laparoscopy for bowel resection is a risk factor for postoperative medical complications and surgical wound infections. Despite various warming methods used during surgery, a significant number of patients experience perioperative hypothermia. Use of dry, unwarmed insufflation carbon dioxide (CO2) during laparoscopic procedures may contribute to this problem. Evidence exists that the HumiGard device, which humidifies and heats CO2 for insufflation, can reduce the risk of perioperative hypothermia. Objective The aim is to determine if insufflation with warmed, humidified CO2 using the HumiGard device, alongside standard perioperative warming techniques, can improve patient recovery, including pain, surgical site infections, complications, and the use of analgesia compared with standard care alone. Methods The study is a multicenter, randomized, blinded (patient, surgeon, and assessor), sham device-controlled, parallel group-controlled trial of 232 patients. The study aims to recruit patients undergoing elective laparoscopic, segmental, or total colectomy. Patients will be randomized to receive HumiGard plus standard care or standard care alone (1:1 ratio). The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of recovery, measured by the validated QoR-40 (quality of recovery) questionnaire, from baseline to postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, the incidence of hypothermia, and the rate of postoperative complications. Results The information gathered during a small-scale service evaluation at a single hospital was used to inform this study protocol. Before applying for a grant for this full randomized controlled trial, the authors will conduct a feasibility study of 40 patients to ensure that the protocol is feasible and to inform our sample size calculation. Conclusions The randomized controlled trial is designed to provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of the HumiGard device in potentially reducing the risk of perioperative hypothermia in patients scheduled for laparoscopic colectomy. The results will be used to improve the maintenance of adequate patient body temperature during surgery. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/14533

INTRODUCTION Postoperative wound infections have been responsible for increasing morbidity and are associated with an increased use of hospital resources. Previous studies have identified several risk factors. However, most studies are outdated, and few relate to the era of enhanced recovery and laparoscopic surgery. This study investigated the association between patient and operative factors and the development of postoperative wound infections in colorectal surgery. METHODS Patients with documented wound infections or dehiscences were identified from a database of elective and emergency colorectal surgery. Patients with wound infections were matched by operation type to a control group of colorectal patients. Differences in patient and operative factors between case and control group were analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 56 patients with wound infection were identified from 647 operations (8.6%). Fifty-seven per cent were emergency operations and eighty-eight per cent were performed as open surgery or as laparoscopic surgery converted to open. Forty per cent of patients had high ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grades (3 or 4). Multivariate logistical regression showed that obese patients and those having open surgery had the highest risk of infections. The median postoperative hospital stay for patients with wound infections was twice as long as for those patients without wound infections. CONCLUSIONS Open surgery and obesity are independent risk factor for wound infections. An increase in laparoscopically performed operations and new strategies for managing wounds in obese patients may help to reduce the rate of wound infection.

Background The aim of this study was to establish if endoscopists can reliably self-assess their ability to perform simulated colonic polypectomy. Methods Novices, intermediates, advanced, and experts performed a video-recorded polypectomy task using the Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) colonoscopy suitcase simulator. This involved removal of a simple polyp (A) and a complex polyp (B). Participants self-assessed themselves using a Direct Observation of Polypectomy Skills (DOPyS) assessment form. Two blinded, independent, Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) accredited assessors graded each performance using the same DOPyS scoring. The Spearman coefficient was used to determine the correlation between self and assessors' scores. Results Eighty participants completed the task. There was a weak correlation between assessors' scores and self-assessment scores for all groups (novices: ρ = −.44, P = .85; intermediates: ρ = −.16, P = .51; advanced: ρ = .16, P = .50; and experts: ρ = .07, P = .76). There was a strong correlation between scores from assessor 1 and 2 for polyp A (ρ = .80, P ≤ .01) and polyp B (ρ = .80, P ≤ .01). Conclusions The correlation between self-assessment and assessors' scores is weak. Novices and intermediates underestimate performance, whereas advanced and experts overestimate performance. Regular feedback may improve accuracy.

In 2011 the royal college of surgeons published From Theory to Theatre. This document states that delivering high quality research is the responsibility of anyone involved in any aspect of surgery. In 2012 the college outlined plans to develop a nationwide research infrastructure to allow the expansion of clinical trials in surgery. This incorporates trainee research groups, which are growing in popularity and productivity. The aim is to give surgical trainees the opportunity to facilitate large scale, multicentre clinical trials. Current activity is therefore placing increasing emphasis on conducting good quality research at all stages of surgical training.

Aim Simulation allows the acquisition of complex skills within a safe environment. Endoscopic polypectomy has a long learning curve. Our novel polypectomy simulator may be a useful adjunct for training. The aim of this study was to assess its content validity. Method The Welsh Institute for Minimal Access Therapy (WIMAT) endoscopy suitcase was designed to simulate colonic polypectomy. Participants from regional and national courses were recruited into the study. Each undertook a standardized simulated polypectomy and completed a seven-point Likert scale questionnaire examining its realism. Results In all, 17 participants completed the questionnaire: 15 (88.2%) gastroenterologists, one (5.9%) colorectal surgeon and one (5.9%) experienced endoscopic nurse specialist. Of the gastroenterologists, seven (46.7%) were consultants and eight (53.3%) were senior trainees or Post CCT (Certificate of Completion of Training) fellows. The mean number of real-life polypectomies performed by the cohort was 156 (95% CI 35–355). The highest scores were for ‘mucosal realism’ (median score 6.0, P = 0.001), ‘endoscopic snare control’ (median score 6.0, P = 0.001), ‘handling the polyp’ (median score 6.0, P = 0.001) and ‘raising mucosa’ (median score 6.0, P < 0.001). Of the 15 parameters examined only three were not statistically significant in favour of the simulator. These were ‘anatomical realism of sessile polyps’, ‘resistance of scope movement’ and ‘paradoxical motion’. The overall score for the simulation was 6.0 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the level of difficulty of the simulator compared with real life (median score 4.0, P = 0.559). Conclusion The WIMAT colonoscopy suitcase model has excellent content validity for several parameters. This may have potential applications in medical training and assessment.

The evidence for using surgical simulators in training and assessment is growing rapidly. A systematic review has demonstrated the validity of different simulators for a range of procedures. Research suggests that skills developed on simulators can be transferred to the operating theatre. The increased interest in simulation comes as a result of the need to streamline surgical training. This is reflected by the numerous simulation-based courses that have become an essential part of modern surgical training.

Background: The use of simulation for laparoscopic training has led to the development of objective tools for skills assessment. Motion analysis represents one area of focus. This study was designed to assess the evidence for the use of motion analysis as a valid tool for laparoscopic skills assessment. Methods: Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed were searched using the following domains: (1) motion analysis, (2) validation and (3) laparoscopy. Studies investigating motion analysis as a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skill in general surgery were included. Common endpoints in motion analysis metrics were compared between studies according to a modified form of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence and recommendation. Results: Thirteen studies were included from 2,039 initial papers. Twelve (92.3 %) reported the construct validity of motion analysis across a range of laparoscopic tasks. Of these 12, 5 (41.7 %) evaluated the ProMIS Augmented Reality Simulator, 3 (25 %) the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), 2 (16.7 %) the Hiroshima University Endoscopic Surgical Assessment Device (HUESAD), 1 (8.33 %) the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester (ADEPT) and 1 (8.33 %) the Robotic and Video Motion Analysis Software (ROVIMAS). Face validity was reported by 1 (7.7 %) study each for ADEPT and ICSAD. Concurrent validity was reported by 1 (7.7 %) study each for ADEPT, ICSAD and ProMIS. There was no evidence for predictive validity. Conclusions: Evidence exists to validate motion analysis for use in laparoscopic skills assessment. Valid parameters are time taken, path length and number of hand movements. Future work should concentrate on the conversion of motion data into competency-based scores for trainee feedback.

The opportunity for using simulation in medical training has expanded in recent years. 1–3 Laparoscopic surgery is an area that is ideally suited to the use of simulators for the acquisition of clinical skills. 4 Simulation allows educators to have control over pre-selected scenarios, without distressing patients or encountering complications. 5

IntroductionA defunctioning ileostomy is often formed during rectal cancer surgery to reduce the potentially fatal sequelae of anastomotic leak. Once the ileostomy is closed and bowel continuity restored, many patients can suffer poor bowel function, that is, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). It has been suggested that delay to closure can increase incidence of LARS which is known to significantly reduce quality of life. Despite this, within the UK, time to closure of ileostomy is not subject to national targets within the National Health Service and delay to closure exceeds 18 months in one-third of patients. Clinical factors, surgeon and patient preference or service pressures may all impact time to closure, yet to date no study has investigated this. The aim of this UK-wide study is to assess time to ileostomy closure and identify reasons for delays.Methods and analysisA UK-wide multicentre prospective snapshot study, together with retrospective analysis of ileostomy closure through The Dukes’ Club Research Collaborative including patients undergoing ileostomy closure in a 3-month period (April to June 2018) and all patients who underwent anterior resection and ileostomy formation over a historical 12-month period (2015). Time to closure and incidence of ‘non-closure’ will be calculated. Units will be surveyed to determine local clinical and management protocols and barriers to timely closure. Multivariate linear regression analysis will be used to determine factors significantly associated with delay to ileostomy closure.Ethics and disseminationStudy approved by the South West-Exeter Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority. Study results will be submitted for presentation at international conferences and for publication in peer-reviewed journals. Results will be presented to and discussed with the patient and public representatives and relevant national bodies to facilitate the development of consensus guidelines on optimum treatment pathways.

Rectovaginal endometriosis is a severe form of pelvic endometriosis in which pharmacological treatment is relatively ineffective (Vercellini et al., Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1375-87). Laparoscopic surgical treatment is effective, but has the potential risks of bowel perforation and colostomy formation (Darai et al., Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:394-400). Transrectal ultrasound scanning can be applied as a preoperative tool to predict the presence of rectovaginal endometriosis and bowel wall involvement (Abrao et al., J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:50-4).Thirty-two women underwent transrectal ultrasound followed by therapeutic laparoscopy. Likelihood ratios and post-test prevalences were calculated with Fagan's normogram. This was then extrapolated with the aid of a mathematical model to a low-risk population.A positive likelihood ratio was found to be 10.89 (95% confidence ratio (CI): 1.62-73.15) and a negative likelihood ratio was found to be 0.24 (95% CI: 0.1-0.57). The pre-test prevalence of rectovaginal endometriosis was 56%. The positive post-test prevalence probability was 93%, and the negative post-test prevalence probability was 23%.Preoperative transrectal ultrasound scanning for rectovaginal endometriosis is an extremely accurate predictive test, and strongly predicts the need for extensive laparoscopic dissection and potential bowel resection.

Chronic wounds are relatively common and have huge financial implications. The etiology of chronic wounds can be diverse, and the healing process is affected by patients' comorbidities, as well as local wound factors. There is an urgent need for improved treatment options for the management of chronic wounds. There has been the recent development of tissue-engineered products that are directed at the proliferation stage of wound healing and aim to replicate or replace the extracellular matrix. We review acellular dermal matrix products used in the management of chronic wounds.

Background The aims of treatments for Crohn's disease are symptom control by medical or surgical means and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A wide number of classification systems, instruments of disease activity measurement (DAM) and HRQOL are available, but few are used in routine surgical practice. Objective To review the validity of DAM and HRQOL instruments and their applicability to surgically treated patients. Method A systematic literature search was undertaken to identify these instruments. Qualifying articles were used to determine the construct, content and criterion validity of the instruments identified with respect to surgically treated patients. Results Thirteen disease activity indices and 11 HRQOL assessment tools were identified. Construct validity was demonstrated throughout but concerns of content and criterion validity were noted. Conclusion None of the current disease activity or HRQOL tools can be used without potential bias in a trial of surgical vs medical therapy as the items included favour the outcomes experienced following medical therapy. A more balanced assessment tool in the setting of a multidisciplinary trial is needed.

Introduction Self-assessment is a way of improving technical capabilities without the need for trainer feedback. It can identify areas for improvement and promote professional medical development. The aim of this review was to identify whether selfassessment is an accurate form of technical skills appraisal in general surgery. Methods The PubMed, MEDLINE®, Embase™ and Cochrane databases were searched for studies assessing the reliability of self-assessment of technical skills in general surgery. For each study, we recorded the skills assessed and the evaluation methods used. Common endpoints between studies were compared to provide recommendations based on the levels of evidence. Results Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria from 22,292 initial papers. There was no level 1 evidence published. All papers compared the correlation between self-appraisal versus an expert score but differed in the technical skills assessment and the evaluation tools used. The accuracy of self-assessment improved with increasing experience (level 2 recommendation), age (level 3 recommendation) and the use of video playback (level 3 recommendation). Accuracy was reduced by stressful learning environments (level 2 recommendation), lack of familiarity with assessment tools (level 3 recommendation) and in advanced surgical procedures (level 3 recommendation). Conclusions Evidence exists to support the reliability of self-assessment of technical skills in general surgery. Several variables have been shown to affect the accuracy of self-assessment of technical skills. Future work should focus on evaluating the reliability of self-assessment during live operating procedures.

Background The incidence of incisional hernias (IHs) following midline abdominal incisions is difficult to estimate. Furthermore recent analyses have reported inconsistent findings on the superiority of absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures. Objective To estimate the mean IH rate following midline laparotomy from the published literature, to identify variables that predict IH rates and to analyse whether the type of suture (absorbable versus non-absorbable) affects IH rates. Methods We undertook a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines. We sought randomised trials and observational studies including patients undergoing midline incisions with standard suture closure. Papers describing two or more arms suitable for inclusion had data abstracted independently for each arm. Results Fifty-six papers, describing 83 separate groups comprising 14 618 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of IHs after midline incision was 12.8% (range: 0 to 35.6%) at a weighted mean of 23.7 months. The estimated risk of undergoing IH repair after midline laparotomy was 5.2%. Two meta-regression analyses (A and B) each identified seven characteristics associated with increased IH rate: one patient variable (higher age), two surgical variables (surgery for AAA and either surgery for obesity surgery (model A) or using an upper midline incision (model B)), two inclusion criteria (including patients with previous laparotomies and those with previous IHs), and two circumstantial variables (later year of publication and specifying an exact significance level). There was no significant difference in IH rate between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures either alone or in conjunction with either regression analysis. Conclusions The IH rate estimated by pooling the published literature is 12.8% after about two years. Seven factors account for the large variation in IH rates across groups. However there is no evidence that suture type has an intrinsic effect on IH rates.

Background: Concerns have been raised on the effects that recent changes in junior doctor work patterns may have on the breadth and depth of operative exposure achieved during specialist registrar training. This study aimed to determine whether there was any justification for these concerns by assessing whether there have been significant changes in either the number of cases or the case mix operated upon by registrars over the course of the past fifteen years. Methods: A retrospective review of theatre records was undertaken, looking at the caseload of the registrars working for the same two consultant surgeons at one district general hospital in four one-year periods (1986–7; 1991–2; 1998–9; 2001–2). The number, subspecialty, and time of each operation were recorded. Results: Whilst operating experience for the first three periods of the study was static, the most recent assessment point has demonstrated a significant reduction in trainee routine operative experience and also a small reduction in the emergency workload performed by both firms. There was also a significant change in the elective case mixes corresponding to consultant sub-specialisation during this period. In addition, there were notable changes in the nature of the emergency workload and a reduction in the number of cases performed after midnight. Conclusion: SpRs trained during the Caiman era appear to be gaining less operative experience than their predecessors in both the elective and emergency settings. With further changes in working patterns currently being implemented, major changes to SpR programmes are required if surgeons are to be adequately trained

In 2011 the royal College of Surgeons produced a document entitled FromTheory toTheatre: Overcoming Barriers to Innovation in Surgery that states:'Delivering high quality research is the responsibility of anyone involved in any aspect of surgery.' It highlights that in 2008–2009 surgical research received just 1.5% of the £1.53 billion total governmental spend on medical research. From this came a call for a review of public funding of translational research in surgery and academic departments of surgery in delivering this research. The overall outcome was the creation of 15 recommendations.

ObjectivesIncisional hernias are common complications of midline abdominal closure. The ‘Hughes Repair’ combines a standard mass closure with a series of horizontal and two vertical mattress sutures within a single suture. There is evidence to suggest this technique is as effective as mesh repair for the operative management of incisional hernias; however, no trials have compared Hughes repair with standard mass closure for the prevention of incisional hernia formation. This paper aims to test the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial of a comparison of abdominal wall closure methods following midline incisional surgery for colorectal cancer, in preparation to a definitive randomised controlled trial.Design and settingA feasibility trial (with 1:1 randomisation) conducted perioperatively during colorectal cancer surgery.ParticipantsPatients undergoing midline incisional surgery for resection of colorectal cancer.InterventionsComparison of two suture techniques (Hughes repair or standard mass closure) for the closure of the midline abdominal wound following surgery for colorectal cancer.Primary and secondary outcomesA 30-patient feasibility trial assessed recruitment, randomisation, deliverability and early safety of the surgical techniques used.ResultsA total of 30 patients were randomised from 43 patients recruited and consented, over a 5-month period. 14 and 16 patients were randomised to arms A and B, respectively. There was one superficial surgical site infection (SSI) and two organ space SSIs reported in arm A, and two superficial SSIs and one complete wound dehiscence in arm B. There were no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions reported in either arm. Independent data monitoring committee found no early safety concerns.ConclusionsThe feasibility trial found no early safety concerns and demonstrated that the trial was acceptable to patients. Progression to the pilot and main phases of the trial has now commenced following approval by the independent data monitoring committee.Trial registration numberISRCTN 25616490.

We report the case of a 78-year-old female who was found to have a mycotic thoracic aortic arch aneurysm caused by Clostridium septicum . Subsequent investigations demonstrated adenocarcinoma of the caecum with two liver metastases. The patient underwent a hybrid procedure involving endovascular repair of the aneurysm with a right-to-left carotid crossover bypass and a left carotid to left subclavian bypass to protect the cerebral and left subclavian blood flow. The caecal tumour was later completely excised by laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The patient then underwent resection for the liver metastases. There was no evidence of tumour recurrence 2 years after her right hemicolectomy. This case emphasizes the importance of the association of C. septicum infection with colorectal malignancy. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a mycotic aortic arch aneurysm caused by C. septicum being successfully treated with a hybrid endovascular repair procedure.

BACKGROUND Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) have been widely adopted since first being described by Buess et al in 1985. A specially designed rectoscope is used with laparoscopic imaging and angulated instrumentation to allow precise dissection of rectal lesions under a magnified view. We describe a novel ex vivo simulator for TEO/TEM training. TECHNIQUE A porcine rectal specimen was used to simulate the human rectum. A standardised liquid polyp mix is injected into the submucosal layer of the bowel. This solidifies at room temperature, allowing it to remain in situ, providing a realistic rectal lesion when visualised through the transanal endoscopic equipment (Fig 1). The stages of polyp removal can be practised including circumferential excision margin marking, polyp excision and suturing of the rectal defect. This simulation has been trialled by delegates on a laboratory-based TEO course (Fig 2).

Background: The ability to make an objective evaluation of a surgeon's operative ability remains an elusive goal. In this study, we used motion analysis as a measure of dexterity in the performance of a simulated operation. Methods: Fifteen surgeons performed a total of 45 laboratory-based laparoscopic cholecystectomies on a cadaveric porcine liver model. Subjects were assigned to one of three groups according to their level of experience in human laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Electromagnetic tracking devices were used to analyze the surgeon's hand movements as they performed the procedure. Movement data (time, distance, number of movements, and speed of movement) were then compared. Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) movement scores across the three groups showed significantly better performance among the experienced laparoscopic surgeons than the novices. Learning curves across repetitions of procedures were plotted. Novices made more improvement than experts. Conclusions: Motion analysis provides useful data for the assessment of laparoscopic dexterity, and the porcine liver model is a valid simulation of the real procedure.

Background: To validate the usefulness of virtual reality surgical simulators, we investigated the transfer of skills achieved by their use to real tasks. Methods: Thirty medical students underwent a pretest using a real laparoscopic trainer. They were then randomized to the following three groups: group I received no training; group II received training using the Minimal Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR); and group III received training using conventional training exercises. Each group then underwent a posttest. Using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), scores were generated for time taken, distance traveled, number of movements made, and speed of instrument movement. Results: Significant changes between the MIST-VR group (group II) and the conventionally trained group (group III), were observed in the speed of movement of the left hand and the numbers of movements taken by each hand, when compared to the untrained group (group I). Conclusion: The training of novices using MIST-VR yields quantifiable changes in skill that are transferable to a simple real task and are similar to the results achieved with conventional training.

Background: This study assesses the transfer of laparoscopic skills to a group of Basic Surgical Trainees (BST) attending the Basic Surgical Skills (BSS) course. Methods: The virtual reality simulator MIST-VR was used to assess 13 trainees before and after the course and again 3 weeks and 3 months later. Analysis of kinematic data using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device gave measures of distance traveled, distance efficiency ratio, time taken, number of errors made, and number of movements made in completing a virtual laparoscopic task. The performance of the group was compared to a control group who underwent no training. Results: All parameters improved significantly after the course, with the exception of distance traveled by the instruments. All outcome measures were significantly improved at 3 weeks. The control group showed a nonsignificant trend toward improvement in all parameters. Conclusions: The Basic Surgical Skills course produces quantifiable improvements in laparoscopic skill that are measurable by MIST-VR. There is a learning effect associated with using MIST-VR alone.

There are many facets to being a skilful surgeon. Knowledge of anatomy, pathophysiology, operative theory and practice are all of vital importance. In addition, skills in decision-making, communication and team-leadership are all needed. Psychomotor manual dexterity is also of importance, particularly when considering the field of minimal-access surqery (MAS). There is a growing need to be able to assess surgical ‘skill’, both for the purposes of training and for the maintenance of exemplary practice. Attempts by academia and industry to produce systems to give an objective assessment of surgical ‘skill’ have been fraught with difficulty. Objectively assessing such a multifaceted phenomenon as ‘surgical skill’ produces many problems. This article aims to highlight some of the difficulties encountered when trying to produce a system of objective assessment, with a particular focus on MAS, and describes some of the solutions that have been described.

Background Ultravision™ is a new device that utilizes electrostatic precipitation to clear surgical smoke. The aim was to evaluate its performance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized into “active (device on)” or “control (device off).” Three operating surgeons scored the percentage effective visibility and three reviewers scored the percentage of the procedure where smoke was present. All assessors also used a 5-point scale (1 = imperceptible/excellent and 5 = very annoying/bad) to rate visual impairment. Secondary outcomes were the number of smoke-related pauses, camera cleaning, and pneumoperitoneum reductions. Mean results are presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results In 30 patients (active 13, control 17), the effective visibility was 89.2 % (83.3–95.0) for active cases and 71.2 % (65.7–76.7) for controls. The proportion of the procedure where smoke was present was 41.1 % (33.8–48.3) for active cases and 61.5 % (49.0–74.1) for controls. Operating surgeons rated the visual impairment as 2.2 (1.7–2.6) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.5) for controls. Reviewers rated the visual impairment as 2.3 (2.0–2.5) for active cases and 3.2 (2.8–3.7) for controls. In the active group, 23 % of procedures were paused to allow smoke clearance compared to 94 % of control cases. Camera cleaning was not needed in 85 % of active procedures and 35 % of controls. The pneumoperitoneum was reduced in 0 % of active cases and 88 % of controls. Conclusions Ultravision™ improves visibility during laparoscopic surgery and reduces delays in surgery for smoke clearance and camera cleaning.

National bowel screening programs have led to an increase in early rectal cancer and complex rectal polyp detection by using the transanal endoscopic operation (TEO). Our aim is to develop an ex vivo porcine simulator for TEO training. A video of the prototype is provided (Video 1, available online at www.giejournal.org). Porcine rectal tissue was injected with a “polyp mix” in order to simulate a rectal lesion. This was attached to a TEO device, as demonstrated in Figure 1. A simulated, partial-thickness transanal endoscopic procedure was performed by using the apparatus. The simulator re-created TEO in a realistic manner. The rectal lesion was removed with standard TEO techniques. The model also can be used to practice TEO suturing. This video demonstrates a unique way of simulating TEO that is reproducible and economically viable. The next stage is to validate this model for use in TEO skills training.

Simulation is a useful adjunct to skills-based training. It potentially avoids risk to patients during training and development of basic interventional techniques. This may be of particular relevance in colonoscopy where the learning curve can be long. Several endoscopic devices exist that simulate colonoscopy for training purposes. This study was designed to review the evidence for the validity of these simulators. MEDLINE (1947 to present), PubMed, Embase classic + Embase, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) were searched for studies validating colonoscopy simulators. For each study, we recorded the type of simulator used, the tasks assessed, the endpoints reported, and the type of validity measured. Common endpoints between studies were compared, and the evidence was graded. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Construct validity was reported in five (41.7 %) studies for the Accutouch HT Immersion (cases 1, 3, and 4), four studies (33.3 %) for the GI mentor II (Simbionix) (Modules 1.1, 1.3, 1.7, 2.1, and 5), two studies (16.7 %) for the Olympus Endo Ts-1 2nd Generation, and one study for the Endo X bovine model. Face validity was reported for the Accutouch HT Immersion, the Olympus 2nd Generation, and the KAIST-Ewha. Content validity was reported for the all simulators, excluding the KAIST-Ewha. The only report of criterion validity was for the Endo X bovine model. Evidence exists to support the face, content, and construct validity of several virtual reality colonoscopy simulators for specific diagnostic and therapeutic modules with selected endpoints. One study demonstrates content, construct, and criterion validity for an ex vivo animal platform. Further work is needed to demonstrate the criterion validity of all devices.

The WISPs (Wnt-inducted secreted proteins, WISP-1, WISP-2 and WISP-3) are part of the CCN family. These molecules are known to play a diverse role in cells but their role in cancer cells remains controversial. We analysed the expression of the three WISP molecules at the mRNA and protein levels in a cohort of 94 human colorectal tumours and 80 normal colorectal tissues and correlated the results with the pathological features and clinical outcome of the patients. WISP-1 transcripts were found at higher levels in the tumour samples than in the normal tissue (p=0.0015); higher in patients with Dukes stage B and C compared to Dukes A (p=0.017 and p=0.024, respectively); higher in patients with moderately and poorly differentiated cancers compared to the well differentiated cancers (p=0.020 and p=0.076, respectively and p=0.0035 when combined); higher in node positive tumours compared with the node negative (p=0.11) and in the patients with higher TNM staging (TNM 2, 3 and 4 compared to TNM 1 p=0.037). WISP-2 showed the opposite pattern with lower levels of expression in cancer cells compared to normal (p=0.082). Although no significant differences were found within the cancer group when indices of a more aggressive tumour were compared to the normal tissue a significant reduction in expression was found (Dukes C p=0.044, poorly differentiated p=0.019, TNM 3 p=0.020 and node positive disease p=0.048). WISP-3 transcript levels showed no significant differences between groups. WISPs may play important but contrasting roles in colorectal cancer with WISP-1 appearing to act as a factor stimulating aggressiveness, WISP-2 as a tumour suppressor and WISP-3 having no definable beneficial or detrimental role.

Minimal-access surgery requires the surgeon to integrate a number of skills that are not normally encountered in conventional open surgery. Any complex motor skill can be broken down into a number of components and it is possible that addressing these individual parts may enhance the overall acquisition of such skills. This article examines the components of what constitutes ability for minimal-access surgery.

Crohn's disease (CD) demonstrates great heterogeneity in its presentation and severity. Management of CD is similarly diverse but the aim remains the same — remission of disease activity and improvement of health related quality of life (HR-QoL). Treatment options include steroids, 5-ASA derivatives, immunomodulators and surgery. The aim of this study was to define the variation in practice of consultant gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons treating CD in Wales. Methods: Consultant gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons treating CD in Wales were sent a questionnaire aimed at determining their current practice and their responses were analysed. Results: Eighty-eight consultants — 46 (52%) gastroenterologists and 42 (48%) surgeons — were invited to participate in the survey. Sixty-one (69%) of them responded. Coherent practice was seen across Wales, especially with respect to diagnosis of CD in line with British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. Variation was detected in disease severity assessment and some aspects of management. Conclusion: Practice in Wales is in line with the guidelines for managing CD. While the diagnostic process follows a standard approach, variations exist in treatment and monitoring of disease. Validated disease measurement instruments are seldom used in routine practice. Disease assessment tools need to be simpler to use if they are to help objective measurement of disease activity and treatment decisions.

Introduction Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) is a 50kDa, secreted glycoprotein that has been identified as a member of the serpin gene family and has been shown to exhibit neurotrophic, neuroprotective, anti-angiogenic and anti-tumourigenic effects. The aims of our study were to determine the expression profile of PEDF in a range of colorectal cell lines and its association with clinical and pathological data. Method Six human cell lines (RKO and HT115 are colonic adenocarcinoma, HRT-18 is rectal adenocarcinoma, COLO-201 is metastatic adenocarcinoma (originating from ascites), LS174T is a mucinous adenocarcinoma, and CCD-33C0 is a normal colorectal fibroblast cell line) were analysed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantitative transcript analysis (qPCR). Primary colorectal cancer tissue was collected at operation and analysed using qPCR. Results PEDF transcript was positive in RKO, HRT-18, LS174T and CCD-33C0 cell lines but negative in HT115 and COLO-201. On qPCR, PEDF expression was highly positive in CCD-33C0. PEDF expression was significantly higher in tissue from mucinous tumours compared to adenocarcinoma (p = 0.0421). PEDF expression was lower in colorectal tissue from palliative resections compared to radical resections, with a trend towards significance (p = 0.097). Conclusion PEDF expression was higher in the normal colorectal cell line when compared to colorectal cancer cell lines. There was a trend towards decreased expression in colorectal cancer tissue from palliative resections suggesting a possible tumour suppressor role and may indicate a potential role in primary tumour growth. Further work is proposed to investigate the effect of PEDF expression on cell function. Disclosure of interest None Declared.

Introduction Iatrogenic perforation is a rare but serious complication of colonoscopy. Reported incidence varies between 0.005% and 0.629%, and is mostly based on diagnostic and therapeutic rather than screening colonoscopies. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) has set a target of no more than one perforation in every 1000 screening colonoscopies. Method All cases of iatrogenic perforations within the Bowel Screening Wales programme between January 2009 and December 2014 were identified. As part of a robust Quality Assurance programme, a policy of detailed root cause analysis was introduced in 2011; this was subsequently performed for all cases and outcomes recorded. Results 17,699 screening colonoscopies were performed within the specified time period, of which 10,688 proceeded to polypectomy (60.4%). There were 13 perforations (0.073%), of which 11 underwent root cause analysis. Of these, nine cases were following polypectomy, one was following negotiation around a splenic flexure malignant tumour and one was during a difficult colonoscopy in the context of multiple adhesions and diverticular disease. Almost all were managed with emergency surgery (n = 10). There was one fatality as a result of colonoscopy (0.006%). Conclusion Our perforation rate falls well below the BSG target and is lower than most of the previously published rates for therapeutic and diagnostic colonoscopies. Management of perforations tends to be less conservative than expected, and this was addressed with individual feedback, education and training. Bowel screening is a safe procedure with a low rate of perforation and a low risk of morbidity and mortality. Disclosure of interest None Declared.

Background A wealth of evidence obtained using mouse models indicates that CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) maintain peripheral tolerance to self-antigens and also inhibit anti-tumor immune responses. To date there is limited information about CD4(+) T cell responses in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). We set out to measure T cell responses to a tumor-associated antigen and examine whether Treg impinge on those anti-tumor immune responses in CRC patients. Methodology and principal findings Treg were identified and characterized as CD4(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) using flow cytometry. An increased frequency of Treg was demonstrated in both peripheral blood and mesenteric lymph nodes of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with either healthy controls or patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Depletion of Treg from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of CRC patients unmasked CD4(+) T cell responses, as observed by IFNgamma release, to the tumor associated antigen 5T4, whereas no effect was observed in a healthy age-matched control group. Conclusions/significance Collectively, these data demonstrate that Treg capable of inhibiting tumor associated antigen-specific immune responses are enriched in patients with CRC. These results support a rationale for manipulating Treg to enhance cancer immunotherapy.

Vaginal pessaries are widely considered to be a safe alternative to surgery in older women. We report a case of near fatal septicaemia in a 75-year-old woman associated with a shelf pessary, the presence of which was identified during an exploratory laparotomy. This case highlights the importance of the gynaecological history and examination when assessing older women with septicaemia of unknown source.