Search

Worldwide, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) cause, respectively, 600 000 and 350 000 deaths each year. Viral hepatitis is the leading cause of cirrhosis and liver cancer, which in turn ranks as the third cause of cancer death worldwide. Within the WHO European region, approximately 14 million people are chronically infected with HBV, and nine million people are chronically infected with HCV. Lack of reliable epidemiological data on HBV and HCV is one of the biggest hurdles to advancing policy. Risk groups such as migrants and injecting drug users (IDU) tend to be under-represented in existing prevalence studies; thus, targeted surveillance is urgently needed to correctly estimate the burden of HBV and HCV. The most effective means of prevention against HBV is vaccination, and most European Union (EU) countries have universal vaccination programmes. For both HBV and HCV, screening of individuals who present a high risk of contracting the virus is critical given the asymptomatic, and thereby silent, nature of disease. Screening of migrants and IDUs has been shown to be effective and potentially cost-effective. There have been significant advances in the treatment of HCV and HBV in recent years, but health care professionals remain poorly aware of treatment options. Greater professional training is needed on the management of hepatitis including the treatment of liver cancer to encourage adherence to guidelines and offer patients the best possible outcomes. Viral hepatitis knows no borders. EU Member States, guided by the EU, need to work in a concerted manner to implement lasting, effective policies and programmes and make tackling viral hepatitis a public health priority.

The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Castroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of practical guidelines in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This includes recommendations for the initial evaluation of patients, the choice and duration of antiviral therapy and the follow-up after antiviral therapy. Hepatitis C is a slowly progressive disease. The initial evaluation of chronically HCV-infected patients should include liver biochemistry testing, virological testing and abdominal ultrasound imaging. Liver biopsy is no longer a routine procedure. Antiviral treatment should be considered for all HCV-infected patients. Current antiviral treatment is a long-term process and is associated with substantial side effects. When deciding whether to start treatment or not, the chance of successful treatment (80% with hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3 and 50% with hepatitis C genotype 1 and 4), the fibrosis stage, the expected side effects and the compliance of the patient should be taken into consideration. In the absence of significant fibrosis and necroinflammation in liver biopsy, postponing treatment is an option. Current antiviral treatment is contraindicated. in patients with Child-Pugh-class B or C cirrhosis. The possibility of a liver transplantation should be investigated in these patients. Significant comorbidity with a limited life expectancy is an absolute contraindication for antiviral treatment. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C consists of administration of peginterferon and ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4 are treated for 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 are treated for 24 weeks. In patients with undetectable HCV RNA after four weeks (28 days) of treatment, a shorter treatment is equally effective (12 to 16 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3; 24 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4). Outpatient clinic visits are recommended at the start and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, and thereafter every four to six weeks until the end of treatment. It is recommended to stop treatment if the HCV RNA level has not decreased by at least 2 log(10) IU/ml (c/ml) after 12 weeks of treatment or when HCV RNA is still detectable after 24 weeks of treatment. The recommended frequency of outpatient clinic visits for patients who are not being treated is once every six months in patients with cirrhosis, otherwise every 12 months. It is expected that new anti-HCV-medication (STAT-C, specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV) will become available in the near future. Therefore treatment of chronic HCV infection will probably be more effective in the future.

A 65-year-old HBsAg positive man developed progressive cholestatic liver enzyme abnormalities with histopathological portoportal septum formation, cholestasis, limited mixed infiltrate and hepatocellular ballooning with a ground glass aspect after renal transplantation. Both clinical and pathological features were characteristic of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH), a histological variant of hepatitis-B-virus (HBV) infection with a high mortality rate which affects immunocompromised patients. The diagnosis was made about 9 months after transplantation, after retrospective analysis had shown a postoperative increase in HBV replication. Discontinuation of prednisone treatment and starting antiviral lamivudine therapy reduced HBV DNA load immediately. However due to renal failure caused by hepatorenal syndrome, lamivudine therapy had to be interrupted. The patient died following subacute liver failure with progressive FCH. This case illustrates the importance of early diagnosis and treatment with reduction of immunosuppression and institution of antiviral therapy to prevent progression of FCH in immunocompromised HBsAg positive patients.

Two male patients, aged 54 years and 17 years respectively, were treated with chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Both patients were chronic hepatitis-B-virus (HBV) carriers prior to the chemotherapy. One patients died as a result of the virus exacerbating during chemotherapy; the other patient received the antiviral drug lamivudine prior to the chemotherapy and finished the cures without any problems. Exacerbations of HBV replication followed by an increase in serum transaminase activity levels ('flares') occur naturally during the course of the viral infection. However, there is an elevated risk when a patient receives high doses of corticosteroids for a short period, as is the case in chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Lamivudine is registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and can be used as a prophylactic prior to chemotherapy or to treat an exacerbation of the hepatitis. It is advisable to systematically test all patients with lymphoma for the presence of the HBsAg. If this is positive, prophylactic administration of lamivudine 100 mg once daily is strongly recommended if chemotherapy is indicated.

In a collaborative multicenter case-control study, we investigated the effect of factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin gene mutation, and inherited deficiencies of protein C, protein S, and antithrombin on the risk of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), We compared 43 BCS patients and 92 PVT patients with 474 population-based controls. The relative risk of BCS was 11.3 (95% CI 4.8-26.5) for individuals with factor V Leiden mutation, 2.1 (95% CI 0.4-9.6) for those with prothrombin gene mutation, and 6.8 (95% CI 1.9-24.4) for those with protein C deficiency. The relative risk of PVT was 2.7 (95% CI 1.1-6.9) for individuals with factor V Leiden mutation, 1.4 (95% CI 0.4-5.2) for those with prothrombin gene mutation, and 4.6 (95% CI 1.5-14.1) for those with protein C deficiency. The relative risk of BCS or PVT was not increased in the presence of inherited protein S or antithrombin deficiency. Concurrence of either acquired or inherited thrombotic risk factors was observed in 26% of the BCS patients and 37% of the PVT patients. We conclude that factor V Leiden mutation and hereditary protein C deficiency appear to be important risk factors for BCS and PVT. Although the prevalence of the prothrombin gene mutation was increased, it was not found to be a significant risk factor for BCS and PVT. The coexistence of thrombogenic risk factors in many patients indicates that BCS and PVT can be the result of a combined effect of different pathogenetic mechanisms. (Blood. 2000;96:2364-2368) (C) 2000 by The American Society of Hematology.