51. Properties of projectile-fragments in the $^{40}$Ar + $^{27}$Al reaction at 44 A MeV. Comparison with a multisequential decay model
- Author
-
R. Dayras, C. Volant, J.L. Charvet, A. Pagano, J. Richert, P. Wagner, G. Lanzano, M. Geraci, R. Legrain, E. De Filippo, Département d'Astrophysique, de physique des Particules, de physique Nucléaire et de l'Instrumentation Associée (DAPNIA), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (LPTH), Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Département Recherches Subatomiques (DRS-IPHC), and Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Nuclear reaction ,Nuclear and High Energy Physics ,fragment–fragment coincidence ,27Al(40Ar ,[PHYS.NUCL]Physics [physics]/Nuclear Theory [nucl-th] ,Fission ,E=44 MeV/nucleon ,excitation energy ,Binary number ,01 natural sciences ,Nuclear physics ,velocities ,deduced ,25.70.Pq ,25.70.Mn ,0103 physical sciences ,010306 general physics ,Nuclear Experiment ,X) ,Physics ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Projectile ,projectile fragment yields ,reaction mechanism features ,Entrance channel ,Binary multisequential decay ,angular distributions ,measured ,Nuclear reactions ,Atomic physics ,Excitation - Abstract
GANIL-EXP; Results on projectile fragment–fragment coincidences in the forward direction and for the reaction 40Ar + 27Al at 44 A MeV are presented and compared with the predictions of two different entrance channel models, a two-body and a three-body mechanism both followed by a binary multisequential decay including fission. This analysis shows that many features of the projectile decay products are well accounted for by the binary multisequential decay model. However the results depend critically upon the initial masses and excitation energies of the primary projectile fragments. In this respect, the three-body approach underestimates the excitation energy imparted to the primary fragments whereas the two-body scenario overestimates it. The present data put strong constraints on the initial excitation energy imparted to the primary fragments which appears to be intermediate between the predictions of the two models.
- Published
- 2006