Search

For patients with bloodstream infections, rapid initiation of the appropriate antimicrobial therapy is essential in reducing mortality and morbidity. New developments and automation in clinical microbiology labs speed up the identification and susceptibility results but are expensive. To gain insight in the added value of the new workflows, we simulated the possible impact of rapid identification and susceptibility tests on a real-life cohort of 158 positive blood culture episodes. Our routine workflow was theoretically challenged against two new workflows, one based on rapid identification with MALDI-TOF MS and one based on molecular testing. First, we observed an important role of the rapid communication of the gram stain results, as about one third of patients needed an adaptation of the antimicrobial therapy based on these results. Antibiotic adaptation based on the microorganism identification was necessary in 10% and in another 25% of cases after the availability of the susceptibility results. The added value of the newer workflow methods lies mainly in the field of the rapid identification and was rather limited in our cohort. In conclusion, for optimizing the blood culture workflow, each microbiology lab should critically scan its own workflow and know its own blood culture epidemiology, before investing in expensive or time-consuming processes.

BackgroundThe protection elicited by polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines against community-acquired pneumonia in older adults remains debatable. Alternative vaccine targets include well-conserved pneumococcal protein antigens, such as pneumococcal histidine triad protein D (PhtD).ObjectiveTo evaluate humoral and cellular immune responses and safety/reactogenicity following immunisation with PhtD vaccine with or without adjuvant (alum or AS02V) in older (≥65 years) and young (18–45 years) healthy adults.MethodsTwo phase I/II, single-blind, parallel-group studies were conducted in 150 older and 147 young adults. Participants were randomised to receive 2 doses (months 0 and 2) of PhtD 30μg, PhtD 10μg plus alum, PhtD 30μg plus alum, PhtD 10μg plus AS02V or PhtD 30μg plus AS02V, or the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (23PPV) at month 0 with placebo (saline solution) at month 2. Safety/reactogenicity was assessed. PhtD-specific antibody, T cell and memory B cell responses were evaluated.ResultsSolicited adverse events were more common in young participants and with adjuvanted vaccines. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Although anti-PhtD geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) were consistently lower in the older adult cohort than in young adults, GMCs in the older cohort following PhtD 30μg plus AS02V were comparable to those induced by plain PhtD or PhtD 30μg plus alum in the young cohort. Compared with alum adjuvant, AS02V adjuvant system was associated with an increased frequency of PhtD-specific CD4 cells in both cohorts and a significantly higher specific memory B cell response in the older cohort, similar to responses obtained in the young cohort.ConclusionThe improved immune response to PhtD vaccine containing the AS02V adjuvant system in comparison to alum suggests that the reduced immune response to vaccines in older adults can be partially restored to the response level observed in young adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00307528/NCT01767402.

OBJECTIVETo compare different techniques of endoscope sampling to assess residual bacterial contamination.DESIGNDiagnostic study.SETTINGThe endoscopy unit of an 1,100-bed university hospital performing ~13,000 endoscopic procedures annually.METHODSIn total, 4 sampling techniques, combining flushing fluid with or without a commercial endoscope brush, were compared in an endoscope model. Based on these results, sterile physiological saline flushing with or without PULL THRU brush was selected for evaluation on 40 flexible endoscopes by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) measurement and bacterial culture. Acceptance criteria from the French National guideline (RESULTSOn biofilm-coated PTFE tubes, physiological saline in combination with a PULL THRU brush generated higher mean ATP values (2,579 relative light units [RLU]) compared with saline alone (1,436 RLU; P=.047). In the endoscope samples, culture yield using saline plus the PULL THRU (mean, 43 CFU; range, 1–400 CFU) was significantly higher than that of saline alone (mean, 17 CFU; range, 0–500 CFU; PP=.001).CONCLUSIONPhysiological saline flushing combined with PULL THRU brush to sample endoscopes generated higher ATP values and increased the yield of microbial surveillance culture. Consequently, the acceptance rate of endoscopes based on a defined CFU limit was significantly lower when the saline+PULL THRU method was used instead of saline alone.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1062–1069

Background Many adults fail to achieve seroprotection after receiving 3 doses of monovalent HepB vaccines such as Engerix-B® and the response decreases with age and with common co-morbidities. Sci-B-Vac™ is a trivalent HepB vaccine produced in mammalian cells, adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide, which in addition to small S antigen, contains preS1 and preS2 antigens expressing highly immunogenic T- and B-cell epitopes that may enhance seroprotection rates (SPR) in adults. Methods In a multicentre study, the immunogenicity of 10 µg dose of Sci-B-Vac™ was compared with a 20-µg dose of Engerix-B® given at days 0, 28, and 168 (NCT03393754). Randomization was stratified by study center and age (18–44, 45–64, ≥65 years). Immunogenicity, including SPR (% subjects with anti-HBs levels ≥10 mIU/mL), and safety outcomes were followed to Day 336. The co-primary objectives were (1) non-inferiority in adults ≥18 years and (2) superiority in adults ≥45 years of SPR, 4 weeks after the third dose. Results Of 1,607 randomized subjects, 42.3% were from United States, 41.6% EU, and 16.1% Canada. Males (38.5%) and females (61.5%) were enrolled to 18–44 (18.6%), 45–64 (44.6%), and ≥ 65 year (36.8%) age groups. Both co-primary endpoints were met. In the non-inferiority analysis, SPR in Sci-B-Vac™ recipients aged ≥18 years was 91.4% vs. 76.5% for Engerix-B®; SPR difference: 14.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) [11.2%, 18.6%]. Superiority analysis showed that SPR in Sci-B-Vac™ recipients aged ≥45 years was 89.4% vs. 73.1% for Engerix-B®—SPR difference: 16.4%; 95% CI [12.2%, 20.7%] (figure). Significantly higher SPR for Sci-B-Vac™ vs. Engerix-B® was noted in subgroups (gender, BMI, diabetes, smoking and particularly age—SPR difference for 45–64 (14.7% [9.8–19.8%]) and ≥ 65 (18.9% [11.6–26.1%]) years. No major safety signals were observed; solicited and unsolicited adverse events were consistent with the known vaccine safety profiles. Conclusion Sci-B-Vac™ met immunogenicity endpoints for non-inferiority in adults aged ≥ 8 years and was superior in adults aged ≥45 years, compared with the monovalent vaccine, Engerix-B®. Sci-B-Vac™ SPR was higher compared with Engerix-B® in key subgroups. No safety signals were observed and safety and tolerability were consistent with the known profile of Sci-B-Vac™. Disclosures Timo Vesikari, MD, VBI (Grant/Research Support, I have received funding from VBI to carry out the reported clinical trial in Finland), Joanne M. Langley, MD, VBI Vaccines (Grant/Research Support), Johanna Spaans, BSc, MSc, VBI Vaccines (Employee), Nathalie Machluf, PhD, SciVac Ltd. (Employee), Dave Anderson, PhD, VBI Vaccines, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder), Vlad Popovic, MD, VBI Vaccines (Employee), Francisco Diaz-Mitoma, MD, VBI Vaccines, Inc. (Consultant, Shareholder, Independent Contractor). Other Authors: No reported disclosures.

There is variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics (AB) in critically ill patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could overcome this variability and increase PK target attainment. The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of a dose-adaption strategy based on daily TDM on target attainment.This was a prospective, partially blinded, and randomised controlled trial in patients with normal kidney function treated with meropenem (MEM) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). The intervention group underwent daily TDM, with dose adjustment when necessary. The predefined PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target was 100% fT4MIC [percentage of time during a dosing interval that the free (f) drug concentration exceeded 4 times the MIC]. The control group received conventional treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that reached 100% fT4MIC and 100 % fTMIC at 72 h.Forty-one patients (median age 56 years) were included in the study. Pneumonia was the primary infectious diagnosis. At baseline, 100% fT4MIC was achieved in 21% of the PTZ patients and in none of the MEM patients; 100% fTMIC was achieved in 71% of the PTZ patients and 46 % of the MEM patients. Of the patients in the intervention group, 76 % needed dose adaptation, and five required an additional increase. At 72 h, target attainment rates for 100% fT4MIC and 100% fTMIC were higher in the intervention group: 58 vs. 16%, p = 0.007 and 95 vs. 68%, p = 0.045, respectively.Among critically ill patients with normal kidney function, a strategy of dose adaptation based on daily TDM led to an increase in PK/PD target attainment compared to conventional dosing.

The investigational AS04-adjuvanted herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein D (gD2) subunit prophylactic vaccine ('HSV vaccine'; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) has been shown to be well tolerated in adults, but limited data exist for pre-teen and adolescent girls, a likely target population. The primary objective of this study was to compare the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 12 months between HSV vaccine recipients and saline recipients (placebo control group) in pre-teen and adolescent girls. The immunogenicity of the HSV vaccine was also assessed.Healthy girls aged 10-17 years, stratified by age (10-15 years; 16-17 years), were randomised 2:1:1 to receive the HSV vaccine, a hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix™; HAV control) or placebo (saline) according to a 0-, 1-, 6-month schedule. Participants and study personnel not involved in the preparation or administration of vaccines were blinded to treatment. Safety and immunogenicity analyses were performed overall and by age (10-15 years; 16-17 years) and HSV serostatus.No statistically significant difference in the percentage of subjects with SAEs was observed between the HSV and saline group, or between the HSV and pooled control (HAV and saline) groups. The HSV vaccine was well tolerated, although a higher incidence of solicited local symptoms was observed in the HSV group than in the control group. Neither age nor HSV serostatus at the time of study entry had an impact on the safety profile of this vaccine. The HSV vaccine was immunogenic regardless of pre-vaccination HSV serostatus. Higher anti-gD geometric mean concentrations were observed in HSV-1 seropositive participants than in HSV-1 seronegative participants.The HSV vaccine had an acceptable safety profile, and was well tolerated and immunogenic when administered to girls aged 10-17 years regardless of age or HSV pre-vaccination serostatus.

Whale strandings remain poorly understood, although bacterial infections have been suggested to contribute. We isolated Edwardsiella tarda from the blood of a stranded sperm whale. The pathogen was identified with MALDI-TOF MS, confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and quantified in blood by qPCR. We report the first case of sepsis in a sperm whale. The zoonotic potential of E. tarda and the possible role of bacterial infections in the enigmatic strandings of cetaceans are discussed.

Seasonal influenza in healthy working-age adults accounts for a substantial part of the socioeconomic burden of this disease. Intanza® 9 µg (sanofi pasteur) is a microneedle-delivered intradermal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine approved in 2009 for the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults 18 to 59 years of age. The microneedle system reliably and reproducibly delivers the vaccine to the dermis. Clinical studies show that Intanza 9 µg is as immunogenic and as well tolerated in working-age adults as a reference intramuscular trivalent inactivated vaccine. Local reactions to Intanza 9 µg, mainly erythema, are transient, mostly mild or moderate, and do not affect acceptability. Intanza 9 µg is considered satisfactory by at least 95% of both vaccinees and prescribers, especially because of the short needle and rapid administration. Because Intanza® 9 µg offers an alternative to intramuscular vaccines, it might help increase influenza vaccine coverage rates.

© 2016 Lazarus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Avian influenza continues to circulate and remains a global health threat not least because of the associated high mortality. In this study antibody persistence, booster vaccine response and cross-clade immune response between two influenza A(H5N1) vaccines were compared. Participants aged over 18-years who had previously been immunized with a clade 1, A/Vietnam vaccine were re-immunized at 6-months with 7.5 μg of the homologous strain or at 22-months with a clade 2, alum-adjuvanted, A/Indonesia vaccine. Blood sampled at 6, 15 and 22-months after the primary course was used to assess antibody persistence. Antibody concentrations 6-months after primary immunisation with either A/Vietnam vaccine 30 μg alum-adjuvanted vaccine or 7.5 μg dose vaccine were lower than 21-days after the primary course and waned further with time. Re-immunization with the clade 2, 30 μg alum-adjuvanted vaccine confirmed cross-clade reactogenicity. Antibody crossreactivity between A(H5N1) clades suggests that in principle a prime-boost vaccination strategy may provide both early protection at the start of a pandemic and improved antibody responses to specific vaccination once available.

Background. An adjuvanted recombinant varicella zoster virus (VZV) subunit vaccine is being developed for the prevention of herpes zoster and its complications. Methods. In a phase I/II, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, older adults (50-70 years) received 2 doses 2 months apart of an adjuvanted recombinant glycoprotein E vaccine (HZ/su; n = 45), a live attenuated Oka strain VZV vaccine (OKA; n = 45), or HZ/su and OKA administered concomitantly (n = 45). To evaluate safety prior to administration in older adults, young adults (18-30 years) were vaccinated with 2 doses 2 months apart of HZ/su (n = 10) or OKA (n = 10). Safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to 42 months for older adults immunized with HZ/su and up to 12 months for all others. Results. Few grade 3 events and no severe adverse events were reported. Fatigue, myalgia, headache, and injection site pain were the most common solicited reactions for HZ/su and occurred more frequently than with OKA. CD4(+) T-cell and humoral immune responses were much higher with HZ/su than with OKA and remained elevated until 42 months. Addition of OKA to HZ/su did not increase immunogenicity. Conclusions. In this study, HZ/su adjuvanted subunit vaccine was well tolerated and more immunogenic than a live attenuated VZV vaccine. Clinical Trial registration. NCT00492648 and NCT00492648.

This randomized double-blind study aimed to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a gp120/NefTat candidate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine formulated with one of three different Adjuvant Systems (AS02(A), AS02(V) and AS01(B)) in healthy HIV-seronegative adults. All vaccine formulations induced strong HIV-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses characterized by high lymphoproliferative capacity and IL-2 production that were still detectable 18 months after last immunization, with strongest responses seen in the AS01(B) group. Broad coverage was demonstrated against gp120, and to a lesser extent Nef, derived from the most common circulating clades (B, C and circulating recombinant form [CRF]-01). All vaccine formulations exhibited acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. The demonstration of superior CD4(+) T-cell induction by AS01(B) provides important guidance for future HIV vaccine development.

An influenza vaccine with cross-immunogenic potential could play a key role in pandemic mitigation by promoting a rapid immune response to infection and/or subsequent vaccination with strains drifted from the primary vaccine strain. Here we assess the role of AS03(A) (an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing tocopherol) in this prime-boost concept using H5N1 as a model shift influenza antigen. In this open, non-randomised study (NCT00506350; an extension of an earlier randomised study) we assessed immunogenicity in nine groups of 35-50 volunteers aged 19-61 years following administration of AS03(A)-adjuvanted split-virion H5N1 vaccine containing 3.75mug of haemagglutinin (HA) from the A/Indonesia/5/2005(IBCDC-RG2) clade 2.1 strain. A single booster dose of vaccine was administered to four groups primed 14 months previously with different HA levels of AS03(A)-adjuvanted clade 1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004 H5N1 vaccine. Two booster doses (given 21 days apart) were administered to four groups primed 14 months previously with different HA levels of non-adjuvanted A/Vietnam/1194/2004 H5N1 vaccine and also to a control group of un-primed subjects. In individuals primed 14 months earlier with AS03(A)-adjuvanted A/Vietnam/1194/2004 vaccines, a single booster dose of AS03(A)-adjuvanted A/Indonesia/5/2005 induced rapid immune responses (licensure criteria met in 7-14 days) comparable to that observed in the un-primed control group following two doses of adjuvanted vaccine. In contrast, individuals primed with non-adjuvanted formulations exhibited minimal immune responses which, even after two doses, were unexpectedly much lower than that observed in un-primed subjects. AS03(A) enhances the initial priming effect of pandemic influenza vaccination enabling a rapid humoral response to single dose boosting with a heterologous strain at 14 months. In contrast, priming without adjuvant appears to inhibit the response to subsequent vaccination with a heterologous strain. These findings should guide the development of vaccines to combat the present influenza A/H1N1 pandemic.

Background. @nbsp; To protect a naive global population against pandemic influenza, pandemic vaccines should be effective at low antigen doses, because of limited manufacturing capacity. Methods. @nbsp; In a multicenter, randomized, blind-observer phase 1 trial, groups of 50 healthy young adults received 2 doses, 21 days apart, of influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (H5N1) vaccine containing 1.9, 3.8, 7.5 or 15 mug of hemagglutinin with oil-in-water emulsion adjuvant or 7.5 mug of hemagglutinin without adjuvant. Safety was monitored to day 42. Homologous hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) and microneutralization titers were determined after each vaccination. Cross-reactivity against A/Indonesia/05/2005 RG2 was tested after the second vaccination. Results. @nbsp; No vaccine-related significant or serious adverse events occurred. Injection site reactions, but not systemic reactions, were more frequent with adjuvant than without. Even with only 1.9 mug of hemagglutinin plus adjuvant, 72% of subjects had HI titers >/=1:32 after 2 doses. This proportion was 81%-89% with higher adjuvanted doses but was only 34% without adjuvant. Adjuvanted vaccine induced cross-neutralizing antibodies in 39%-65% of samples, versus 7% without adjuvant. Conclusions. @nbsp; The emulsion-adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine candidate was safe, immunogenic, and induced cross-reactive antibodies. This adjuvanted 1.9-mug candidate is the lowest effective dose tested to date. This could have a major impact on prepandemic vaccination strategies with stockpiled batches of vaccine. Trial registration. @nbsp; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00457509 .

Summary Background Antigen sparing is regarded as crucial for pandemic vaccine development because worldwide influenza vaccine production capacity is limited. Adjuvantation is an important antigen-sparing strategy. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant H5N1 split-virion vaccine formulated with a proprietary adjuvant system and investigated whether it can induce cross-reactive immunity. Methods Two doses of an inactivated split A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14 (recombinant H5N1 engineered by reverse genetics) vaccine were administered 21 days apart to eight groups of 50 volunteers aged 18–60 years. We studied four antigen doses (3·8 μg, 7·5 μg, 15 μg, and 30 μg haemagglutinin) given with or without adjuvant. Blood samples were collected to analyse humoral immune response. Adverse events were recorded up through study day 51. Safety analyses were of the whole vaccinated cohort and immunogenicity analyses per protocol. This trial is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309634. Findings All eight vaccine formulations had a good safety profile. No serious adverse events were reported. The adjuvanted vaccines induced more injection-site symptoms and general symptoms than did the non-adjuvanted vaccines, but most were mild to moderate in intensity and transient in nature. The adjuvanted formulations were significantly more immunogenic than the non-adjuvanted formulations at all antigen doses. At the lowest antigenic dose (3·8 μg), immune responses for the adjuvanted vaccine against the recombinant homologous vaccine strain (A/Vietnam/1194/2004 NIBRG-14, clade 1) met or exceeded all US Food and Drug Administration and European Union licensure criteria. Furthermore, 37 of 48 (77%) participants receiving 3·8 μg of the adjuvanted vaccine seroconverted for neutralising antibodies against a strain derived by reverse genetics from a drifted H5N1 isolate (A/Indonesia/5/2005, clade 2). Interpretation Adjuvantation conferred significant antigen sparing that could increase the production capacity of pandemic influenza vaccine. Moreover, the cross-clade neutralising antibody responses recorded imply that such a vaccine could be deployed for immunisation before a pandemic.

In January 2011, as part of an antimicrobial stewardship program the Antimicrobial Management Team (AMT) at the Ghent University Hospital initiated a multidisciplinary Infectious Diseases Team (MIT) consisting of infectious diseases physicians, clinical microbiologists, and clinical pharmacists. The aim of this study is to describe the type and acceptance rate of recommendations provided by the MIT.Prospective, observational study in a tertiary care, university teaching hospital with 1062 beds in non-consecutive hospitalized adult patients, excluding intensive care units and paediatrics.The MIT communicated 432 recommendations in 87 days observed. Of the 293 patients for whom a recommendation was made, the median age was 57 years (range: 16-91 years) and 169 (57·7%) were male. Skin or soft tissue infections (14%), respiratory tract infections (13%), infections without known focus (11%), abdominal infections (11%), and bone infections (8%) were most common. Recommendations were made to perform additional clinical investigation(s) [N = 137 (27%)], to adjust the dose of an antimicrobial drug [N = 42 (8%)], to stop an antimicrobial drug [N = 104 (21%)], to switch from a parenteral to an oral drug [N = 39 (8%)] or to initiate an antimicrobial drug [N = 178 (36%)], with an acceptance rate of 73·0%, 83·3%, 81·7%, 76·9%, and 84·0%, respectively.The MIT formulated about five recommendations a day primarily focusing on pharmacotherapy, but also on clinical investigations. In both fields, a high acceptance rate was observed.

Background The Bacille Calmette–Guerin (BCG) tuberculosis (TB) vaccine provides incomplete protection, necessitating development of an effective vaccine against TB disease. The Mtb72F/AS02 candidate vaccine was previously shown to be clinically well tolerated and immunogenic in Purified Protein Derivative (PPD)-negative adults. To improve the stability of Mtb72F, a point mutation was introduced into a putative serine protease site to give the final M72 construct. AS01 is an Adjuvant System that can potentially improve both humoral and cellular immune responses compared to the AS02 Adjuvant System or unadjuvanted vaccine. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity in Mtb-naive adults of vaccines containing 40 μg of the M72 antigen with AS02 or AS01 and compared the results with Mtb72F/AS02 vaccine (40 μg dose), M72 in saline (40 μg dose) and AS01 alone. Methods In this Phase I/II observer-blind controlled trial, 110 participants were randomized (4:4:1:1:1) to receive M72/AS01, M72/AS02, Mtb72F/AS02, M72/saline or AS01, following a 0, 1-month schedule. Subjects receiving the adjuvanted M72 vaccines were followed up until 3 years post vaccination. Evaluation of the immune response and safety/reactogenicity was performed. Results For all vaccines, solicited adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild to moderate and transient. No vaccine-related serious AEs occurred and no subject withdrew due to an AE. Immune responses induced by Mtb72F and M72 antigens combined with AS02 were similar. M72/AS01 and M72/AS02 induced robust polyfunctional M72-specific CD4 + T cell and antibody responses persisting at 3 years, with the highest CD4 + T cell responses found with M72/AS01. Conclusion This first clinical study with M72/AS01 and M72/AS02 showed that both vaccines were clinically well tolerated and induced high magnitude and persistent cell-mediated and humoral immune responses. The Mtb72F/AS02 and M72/AS02 vaccines were comparably immunogenic with significantly higher immune responses compared to the M72/saline control. Of the formulations tested, M72/AS01 demonstrated significantly higher vaccine specific Th1 CD4 + T cell responses supporting its further clinical evaluation.

Fluarix® is a trivalent, inactivated, split-virion influenza vaccine containing 15 μg haemagglutinin from each of the three influenza virus strains (including an H1N1 influenza A virus subtype, an H3N2 influenza A virus subtype and an influenza B virus) that are expected to be circulating in the up-coming influenza season. Fluarix® is highly immunogenic in healthy adults and elderly, and exceeds the criteria that make it acceptable for licensure in various regions (including the US and Europe). In a large, phase III, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in the US (2004/2005) in subjects aged 18–64 years, postvaccination sero-conversion rates against the H1N1, H3N2 and B antigens were 60–78% and respective postvaccination seroprotection rates were 97–99% in Fluarix® recipients. Another phase III trial conducted in the US (2005/2006) established the noninferiority of Fluarix® versus another trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine in subjects aged ≥18 years, including a subgroup of elderly subjects. In annual European registration trials, Fluarix® has consistently exceeded the immunogenicity criteria set by the EU Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use for adults and the elderly. Fluarix® demonstrated immunogenicity in small, open-label studies in at-risk subjects. During a year when the vaccine was well matched to the circulating strain, Fluarix® demonstrated efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B in a placebo-controlled trial in adults aged 18–64 years. In addition, Fluarix® vaccination of pregnant women demonstrated efficacy in reducing the rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza in the infants and reducing febrile respiratory illnesses in the mothers and their new-born infants in a randomized trial. Fluarix® was generally well tolerated in adults and the elderly in well designed clinical trials and in the annual European registration trials, with most local and general adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in intensity. The most common adverse reactions in recipients of Fluarix® were pain, redness or swelling at the injection site, muscle aches, fatigue, headache and arthralgia. In conclusion, Fluarix® is an important means of decreasing the impact of seasonal influenza viruses on adults and the elderly.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of illness and death worldwide, making a new TB vaccine an urgent public health priority. Purified protein derivative (PPD)-negative adults ( n = 50) were equally randomized to receive 3 doses at 1-month intervals (at 0, 1, and 2 months) of one of the following vaccines: Mtb72F/AS02 A (10 or 40 μg antigen), Mtb72F/saline (10 or 40 μg antigen), or AS02 A . Mtb72F/AS02 A recipients received an additional dose 1 year after the first dose to evaluate if the elicited immune response could be boosted. Mtb72F/AS02 A vaccines were locally reactogenic but clinically well tolerated, with transient adverse events (usually lasting between 1 and 4 days) that resolved without sequelae being observed. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Vaccination with Mtb72F/AS02 A induced a strong Mtb72F-specific humoral response and a robust Mtb72F-specific CD4 + T-cell response, both of which persisted at 9 months after primary immunization and for 1 year after the booster immunization. There was no significant difference between the magnitude of the CD4 + T-cell response induced by the 10-μg and 40-μg Mtb72F/AS02 A vaccines. The Mtb72F-specific CD4 + T cells predominantly expressed CD40L; CD40L and interleukin-2 (IL-2); CD40L and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α); CD40L, IL-2, and TNF-α; and CD40L, IL-2, TNF-α, and gamma interferon (IFN-γ). Serum IFN-γ, but not TNF-α, was detected 1 day after doses 2 and 3 for the Mtb72F/AS02 A vaccine but did not persist. Vaccine-induced CD8 + T-cell responses were not detected, and no immune responses were elicited with AS02 A alone. In conclusion, Mtb72F/AS02 A is clinically well tolerated and is highly immunogenic in TB-naïve adults. The 10- and 40-μg Mtb72F/AS02 A vaccines show comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles.

We evaluated the humoral and cellular immunogenicity of adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine in two groups of 300 adults: aged 18-60 and >60 years in a randomized, open-label, uncontrolled phase 2 trial. Participants received two injections (D0, D21) of 7.5 microg hemagglutinin without adjuvant or 30 microg with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Antibody responses and cytokine secretion were assessed before and after vaccination. Excluding the 6/300 non-elderly and 47/300 elderly participants with pre-existing antibodies, geometric mean titers (dil(-1)) on D42 were higher with 30 microg+Ad and were comparable between age groups. Participants with pre-existing antibodies responded strongly to the first vaccination (GMTs in the range 147-228 on D21). Vaccination increased both Th1 and Th2 T-cell responses. The predominantly Th1 profile observed before vaccination was unaffected by vaccination. H5N1 influenza vaccine is no less immunogenic in elderly adults than in younger adults and, due to a higher proportion non-naïve elderly, immunogenicity was higher in this latter group.

Influenza vaccines remain largely underused. A promising alternative to Current intramuscular vaccines is a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) delivered using a microinjection system to offer a less invasive and possibly more acceptable vaccination. A phase 11, multicentre, randomised open-label study in 978 healthy adults (18-57 years) evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of intradermal TIV. Subjects received a 0.1 ml injection of intradermal TIV, containing 9 mu g of haemagglutinin (HA) per strain (it = 588) or a conventional 0.5 ml intramuscular vaccine (15 mu g of HA/strain: n = 390). Intradermal,11 TIV induced non-inferior humoral immune responses against all three strains and superior responses against both A strains (H1N1, H3N2) compared with the control. Both vaccines were well tolerated. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

BackgroundThe availability of H5N1 vaccines that can elicit a broad cross-protective immunity against different currently circulating clade 2 H5N1 viruses is a pre-requisite for the development of a successful pre-pandemic vaccination strategy. In this regard, it has recently been shown that adjuvantation of a recombinant clade 1 H5N1 inactivated split-virion vaccine with an oil-in-water emulsion-based adjuvant system also promoted cross-immunity against a recent clade 2 H5N1 isolate (A/Indonesia/5/2005, subclade 2.1). Here we further analyse the cross-protective potential of the vaccine against two other recent clade 2 isolates (A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 and A/Anhui/1/2005 which are, as defined by WHO, representatives of subclades 2.2 and 2.3 respectively).Methods and findingsTwo doses of the recombinant A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1, clade 1) vaccine were administered 21 days apart to volunteers aged 18-60 years. We studied the cross-clade immunogenicity of the lowest antigen dose (3.8 microg haemagglutinin) given with (N = 20) or without adjuvant (N = 20). Immune responses were assessed at 21 days following the first and second vaccine doses and at 6 months following first vaccination. Vaccination with two doses of 3.8 microg of the adjuvanted vaccine induced four-fold neutralising seroconversion rates in 85% of subjects against A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 (subclade 2.2) and 75% of subjects against A/Anhui/1/2005 (subclade 2.3) recombinant strains. There was no response induced against these strains in the non-adjuvanted group. At 6 months following vaccination, 70% and 60% of subjects retained neutralising antibodies against the recombinant subclade 2.2 and 2.3 strains, respectively and 40% of subjects retained antibodies against the recombinant subclade 2.1 A/Indonesia/5/2005 strain.ConclusionsIn addition to antigen dose-sparing, adjuvantation of inactivated split H5N1 vaccine promotes broad and persistent cross-clade immunity which is a pre-requisite for a pre-pandemic vaccine.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00309634.

The use of mobile air purification systems in hospitals is widely accepted and even promoted by the CDC, but turns out to be quite expensive. In this study, the Hospital Infection Control Team (HICT) of the Ghent University Hospital evaluated a more cost-effective mobile HEPA filter unit.

Objective Adjuvantation of an H5N1 split-virion influenza vaccine with AS03(A) substantially reduces the antigen dose required to produce a putatively protective humoral response and promotes cross-clade neutralizing responses. We determined the effect of adjuvantation on antibody persistence and B- and T-cell-mediated immune responses. Methods Two vaccinations with a split-virion A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1, clade 1) vaccine containing 3.75-30 mu g hemagglutinin and formulated with or without adjuvant were administered to groups of 50 volunteers aged 18-60 years. Results Adjuvantation of the vaccine led to better persistence of neutralizing and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies and higher frequencies of antigen-specific memory B cells. Cross-reactive and polyfunctional H5N1-specific CD4 T cells were detected at baseline and were amplified by vaccination. Expansion of CD4 T cells was enhanced by adjuvantation. Conclusion Formulation of the H5N1 vaccine with AS03(A) enhances antibody persistence and induces stronger T- and B-cell responses. The cross-clade T-cell immunity indicates that the adjuvanted vaccine primes individuals to respond to either infection and/or subsequent vaccination with strains drifted from the primary vaccine strain.

Objective To evaluate the consistency of three commercial scale lots of candidate herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 2 (HSV-2) vaccine in adolescent girls. Methods A total of 554 healthy girls aged 10–17 years, from Belgium, Canada, and United States, were enrolled and randomized to receive one of the three manufacturing lots of the candidate glycoprotein D2 vaccine (gD2-AS04, GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) according to a 0, 1 and 6-month schedule. Consistency was based on anti-gD geometric mean titers (GMTs) 1 month post-dose 3 among HSV seronegative subjects complying to study procedures (N = 312): two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the GMT ratio between each pair of vaccine lots had to be within the [0.67; 1.5] consistency interval. Results Pre-specified consistency criteria were reached. At month 2 (1 month after the second vaccine dose) anti-gD antibodies were detected in all study participants, while the proportion of subjects with HSV-2 neutralizing antibodies ranged from 93% to 96.2%, remaining >90% throughout the study (between 93.7% and 96.1% for the three vaccine lot groups at month 12). The three vaccine lots had similar reactogenicity profiles. The incidence of grade 3 solicited or unsolicited adverse events (AEs) ranged from 17.9% to 22.2% of subjects. Conclusions This study demonstrated the lot-to-lot consistency of three commercial scale production lots of herpes simplex candidate vaccine. The vaccine was immunogenic and had a clinically acceptable safety profile when administered in HSV type 1 and HSV-2 seronegative girls aged 10–17 years. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (identifier NCT00224471 ).