Search

Background : The protective effects of salt substitutes on blood pressure are well established, yet the individual variations in response to salt substitutes remain unclear. Our study aims to identify the individuals who derive the greatest benefit from salt substitute interventions. Methods : Our study involved 4200 participants at high-risk of stroke from 120 villages in Liaoning Province, as a sub-study of the Salt Substitute and Stroke Study (SSaSS) trial, with 60 villages receiving a 5-year salt substitute intervention and other 60 villages using regular salt. The baseline and endpoint data on basic demographics, anthropometric measurements, and blood pressures were collected. General linear regressions were applied to assess the hypotensive effect of salt substitute intervention on both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), with adjustments for potential confounders using both regression adjustment and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Individual treatment effects (ITEs) of the salt substitute were estimated using causal forest and causal tree methods, and a treatment-by-subgroup interaction analysis was conducted to validate the robustness of our findings. Findings : During the 5-year follow-up, the salt substitute group exhibited a significant SBP reduction compared to the regular salt intervention group ( β = -1.86 mmHg, 95% CI: -3.56 to -0.15 mmHg). This reduction remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders ( β = -2.82 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.26 to -1.37 mmHg) and the usage status of antihypertensive medications ( β = -2.60 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.95 to -1.15 mmHg). However, no significant reduction was observed in DBP levels. Moreover, baseline SBP, body mass index (BMI) and age were identified as the top three modifiers of the salt substitute intervention's efficacy on SBP levels. Specifically, individuals with a baseline SBP ≤ 142 mmHg and age ≤ 65 years old (ITE = -3.02 mmHg, 95% CI = -5.97 to -0.07 mmHg) or those with a baseline SBP >142 mmHg and BMI ≤ 28.2 kg m -2 (ITE = -4.36 mmHg, 95% CI = -6.58 to -2.14 mmHg) received greater benefits from salt substitute supplementations in reducing SBP levels, and the treatment-by-subgroup interaction analysis further corroborated these findings ( P salt intervention group×age = 0.03 and P salt intervention group×BMI = 0.01). Conclusions : Salt substitutes may effectively lower blood pressure in individuals at high-risk of stroke, with the hypotensive effect varying according to individual characteristics. Notably, middle-aged individuals with normotension and non-obese patients with hypertension appear to derive the greatest benefit from salt substitute consumption.

Background: Blood pressure (BP) control can be difficult to attain due to multiple factors, including choosing and titrating antihypertensive medications. Measurement of hemodynamic parameters using impedance cardiography (ICG) at the point of care may allow better alignment of medication with the mechanism(s) underlying an individual's hypertension. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ICG compared to usual care for attainment of BP control., Methods: We searched Medline inclusive of the year 1946 to January 31, 2024, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. English-language articles were eligible for inclusion if they described results of a randomized controlled trial designed to compare ICG-guided BP-medication selection to usual care (i.e., clinician judgment/guidelines-based alone) among a sample of hypertensive patients., Results: Of 1,952 titles screened, 6 trials met inclusion criteria. The first was published in 2002 from a specialty clinic in the United States, and the most recent in 2021 from a specialty clinic in China. One trial was conducted in a primary care setting. Sample sizes ranged from 102 to 164. Participants randomized to ICG-guided antihypertensive medication had reduced BP in the short-term to a greater extent than those randomized to usual care, with odds ratios for BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at 3 months ranging from 1.87 to 2.92. This effect was seen in both specialty clinics and in a primary care setting., Conclusions: Incorporation of ICG in the clinical setting may facilitate medication selection that leads to a greater proportion of patients obtaining BP control in the short term., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Hypertension affects 25%-30% of the world population. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is among the most used and cheapest medications but was in 2018 labeled with a warning stating the increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). This study describes geographical differences in the association between HCTZ and NMSC from the perspective of hypertensive heart disease (HHD)., Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search (PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrial.gov, and Clinicaltrial.eu) using PICO/PECO acronyms, including case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials. We constructed a rate ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALY) for HHD/NMSC in the global burden of disease (GBD) regions., Results: No increased risk of NMSC with the use of HCTZ was found in Taiwan, India, and Brazil. A small (hazard ratio (HR)/odds ratio (OR) ≤1.5) but significantly increased risk was seen in Canada, the United States, and Korea. An increased risk (1.5< HR/OR ≤2.5) in Iceland, Spain, and Japan and a highly increased risk (HR/OR >2.5) in the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Australia. HHD is associated with a more than tenfold DALY rate compared with NMSC in 13 of 21 GBD regions, corresponding to 77.2% of the global population. In none of these 13 regions was there an increased risk of HCTZ-associated NMSC., Conclusions: Despite limited information from many countries, our data point to large geographical differences in the association between HCTZ and NMSC. In all GBD regions, except Australasia, HHD constitutes a more than fivefold DALY rate compared to NMSC. This disproportionate risk should be considered before avoiding HCTZ from the antihypertensive treatment., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Arterial hypertension (AH) remains the leading risk factor associated with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cerebrovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. About 70% of patients with AH who are on monotherapy cannot achieve blood pressure (BP) targets, and therefore all quidelines for the management of AH have recently recommended prescribing combination therapy (PCT). In real clinical practice (RCP), there remains significant uncertainty in the effectiveness and rationality of therapy, despite the wide availability of antihypertensive drugs (AHD) and the presence of recommendations for a stepwise approach to prescribing combinations of specific groups of AHD in different clinical situations., Aim: Analyze the real ongoing antihypertensive therapy, including the PCT; international nonproprietary names of drugs and their dosages in RCP; compliance of therapy with clinical recommendations; changing trends in the PCT., Materials and Methods: An analysis was carried out of the data from the register of AH, the compliance of treatment in different clinical groups of patients and the achievement of BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in the sample of 2019-2022 ( n =5012). The prescription of AHD and achievement of targets values were assessed in accordance with current clinical guidelines for the management of AH and hypercholesterolemia. Data from 2010 ( n =7782) and 2020 ( n =3061) were analyzed to assess the dynamics of prescription of monotherapy and PCT., Results: The greatest increase in the number of AHD was observed in patients with hypertension in combination with coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. In a small group of patients with hypertension without other CVDs, the recommended combinations of AHD were not prescribed; preference was given to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and β-adrenoblocker (β-AB). PCT mainly differed from the recommended combinations by the wider use of drugs from the β-AB group. The PCT of recommended drugs was highest in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease - more than 90%, hypertension and heart failure in 56.2%, hypertension and atrial fibrillation - 33.3%, hypertension and chronic kidney desease - 19.6%. Achievement of BP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets was insufficient in all analyzed groups. Among the international nonproprietary names of drugs, the most frequently prescribed are the following: bisoprolol, metoprolol, lisinopril, perindopril, losartan, spironolactone, amlodipine, torasemide, indapamide, hypochlorothiazide, moxonidine. The prescribed daily dosages were closer to the initial recommended ones. By 2020, the prescription of PCT with β-AB and a more uniform prescription of various combinations will come to the fore, while PCT in 2010 is characterized by the presence of one or two leaders combinations., Conclusion: The described features of prescribing AHD partially reproduce clinical recommendations for the management of AH. Differences in therapy provided in RCP may be associated with an attempt to intensify the treatment of hypertension in patients with other concomitant CVDs. At the same time, analysis of combinations and dosages of prescribed drugs suggests the presence of wide opportunities for further escalation of therapy. The presented data can provide insight into current patterns of antihypertensive therapy prescription in patients in RCP and lay the foundation for optimizing therapy in different categories hypertensive patients.

Telangiectasia macularis multiplex acquisita is an acquired cutaneous telangiectasis of unknown aetiology, and it lacks both effective and cost-efficient treatment. This study aims to identify a novel potential associated factor of the disease and explore feasible therapeutic interventions. In this retrospective case series study, 46 Chinese patients diagnosed with telangiectasia macularis multiplex acquisita between 1 January 2007 and 18 May 2023 were included. The median age of onset was 43 years (23 to 60 years), and the male to female ratio was 10.5:1. Besides previously reported associations including chronic liver disorders, alcohol consumption, and smoking, a potential association was found between use of calcium channel blockers and development of telangiectasia macularis multiplex acquisita. Twenty-two of 27 hypertensive patients took calcium channel blockers, with 17 followed up. Ten out of 17 displayed a range of improvements following the cessation of calcium channel blockers; 1 patient reported no lesion change post-discontinuation of calcium channel blockers; 1 patient continued their medication but showed partial improvement after 2 pulsed dye laser treatments; 1 patient observed lesion colour lightening without altering hypertensive medication or other specific treatments; and another 4 kept their previous hypertensive regimen due to blood pressure stability concerns, with no change in their lesions. The study proposes that cessation of calcium channel blockers can be a novel therapeutic approach for affected individuals.

The frequent concurrence of elevated blood pressure (BP) and type 2 diabetes markedly elevates the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. In this review, we discuss the evidence supporting the role of BP-lowering therapies in preventing cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes and the most appropriate BP treatment target in these individuals. We outline possible reasons for the heterogeneous effect of BP lowering in patients with and without diabetes and consider several pathophysiological mechanisms that could potentially explain such differences. The review introduces a mediation model, delineating the intricate interplay between hypertension and diabetes and their joint contribution to cardiovascular and renal pathologies. Finally, we outline the role of lifestyle changes and other pharmacological options in attenuating cardiometabolic risks in patients with type 2 diabetes. We propose a comprehensive, patient-centred management strategy, integrating various antihypertensive therapeutic approaches and providing clinicians with a systematic framework for better decision-making., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Acute and chronic hypertension causes cerebral vasculopathy, increasing the risk of ischemia and stroke. Our study aimed to compare the effects of arterial pressure reduction on the pial microvascular responses induced by hypoperfusion and reperfusion in spontaneously hypertensive Wistar rats, desamethasone-induced hypertensive Wistar rats and age-matched normotensive Wistar rats fed for 3 months with a normal diet or normal diet supplemented with L-arginine or Taurisolo ® or L-arginine plus Taurisolo ® . At the end of treatments, the rats were submitted to bilateral occlusion of common carotid arteries for 30 min and reperfusion. The microvascular parameters investigated in vivo through a cranial window were: arteriolar diameter changes, permeability increase, leukocyte adhesion to venular walls and percentage of capillaries perfused. Hypoperfusion-reperfusion caused in all rats marked microvascular changes. L-arginine treatment was effective in reducing arterial blood pressure causing vasodilation but did not significantly reduce the damage induced by hypoperfusion-reperfusion. Taurisolo ® treatment was less effective in reducing blood pressure but prevented microvascular damage from hypoperfusion-reperfusion. L-arginine plus Taurisolo ® maintained blood pressure levels within the physiological range and protected the pial microcirculation from hypoperfusion-reperfusion-induced microvascular injuries. Therefore, the blood pressure reduction is not the only fundamental aspect to protect the cerebral circulation from hypoperfusion-reperfusion damage.

Background: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors appear to benefit bone tissue in antihypertensive treatment. However, the association between RAAS inhibitors and bone metabolism was inconsistent., Methods and Study Design: Based on the study of Risk Evaluation of Cancers in Chinese Diabetic Individuals(REACTION) conducted in 2011, We followed 6,252 Lanzhou residents aged 40-75 years from 2014 to 2016. Finally, 1,625 hypertension cases with complete data were included in the analysis. The study subjects were divided into four groups according to the type of antihypertensive drugs. We employed logistic or multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the association between different antihypertensive drug use and osteoporosis, the risk of fracture, and the change in bone mineral density (BMD) level. The association of osteoporosis or the fracture risk by cumulative duration of use of these medications (< 3 years.) and (> 3 years.) was also estimated., Results: The cross-sectional study showed that there was no significant association between baseline antihypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)) use and osteoporosis and fracture. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years in the longitudinal study, there were 478 new osteoporosis cases and 76 fractures. Compared with patients without antihypertensive drug use, the hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the risk of osteoporosis were 1.005(0.651,1.552) and 1.077(0.793,1.462) in ACEI or ARB use (p > 0.05). ACEI or ARB use was also not significantly associated with fracture risk (HR 1.102(0.326,3.726), 0.735(0.251,2.148), p > 0.05). Further analysis showed that the use of ACEI (HR 1.078(0.146,7.950)) or ARB (HR 1.169(0.347,3.939)) was not significantly associated with the improvement of osteoporosis (p > 0.05). In addition, the duration of RAAS inhibitors used showed no apparent correlation with the risk of osteoporosis (≤ 3 years: HR 0.872 (0.516, 1.474), > 3 years: HR 1.151 (0.574, 2.308)), nor with the improvement of osteoporosis and the risk of fracture. Meanwhile, the association mentioned above did not change compared to different RAAS inhibitors., Conclusions: The use of RAAS inhibitors, including ACEIs and ARBs, was not significantly associated with osteoporosis, risk of fracture, or BMD change., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

We aimed to investigate the effect of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism on the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and hypertension treated with enalapril and folic acid. A total of 540 CHD patients diagnosed by coronary angiography in our hospital were selected. According to whether there was folic acid intervention, they were divided into a folic acid group, a non-folic acid group and a control group. The genotypes of the MTHFR C677T locus were detected. Hcy concentration and the folate content were determined. In folic acid group, enalapril and folic acid tablets were used to reduce blood pressure, and clopidogrel or ticagrelor were selected according to CYP2C19 genotypes. In non-folic acid group, enalapril tablets were used, and clopidogrel or ticagrelor were selected based on CYP2C19 genotyping. Routine treatment without intervention was used in control group. Patients were prescribed standardized drug treatment and were followed up by an outpatient service or by telephone for 12 months after discharge. We found that the number and proportion of MTHFR C677T gene mutations in the folic acid group, non-folic acid group and control group were 150 (83.3%), 142 (78.9%) and 144 (80.0%), respectively. The recurrence rate of cardiovascular events in the folic acid and non-folic acid groups was significantly lower, and the degree of reduction in the recurrence rate of cardiovascular events in the folic acid and non-folic acid groups was significantly different. The concentrations of TG, TC, and LDL-C in folate and non-folic groups were lower, while HDL-C was higher than that in control group. To sum up, screening high-risk populations with genotypes has great significance in improving the clinical outcome of CHD patients with H-type hypertension. Folic acid supplementation improves the compliance rate of patients' blood pressure levels and improves their clinical prognosis as well.

Introduction and Objectives: Recent studies have indicated a potential association of hypertension with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and other autoimmune diseases, yet the impact of antihypertensive drugs on HT risk is not well understood., Methods: We employed a drug-target Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the prolonged impact of 9 classes of antihypertensive medications on HT susceptibility in European and Asian populations. Genetic variants close to or within genes associated with the drug targets and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were utilized to mimic the effects of antihypertensive medications. We focused on drugs linked to a lower risk of coronary artery disease for our main analysis. We gathered genetic data on SBP and HT risk from comprehensive genome-wide association studies available for European and Asian groups. For a supplementary analysis, we used expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) related to drug target genes as proxies., Results: Our analysis revealed that the use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is linked to a reduced risk of HT in both European (OR [95% CI]: 0.96 [0.95 to 0.98] per 1 mmHg decrease in SBP; p = 3.51×10 -5 ) and Asian populations (OR [95% CI]: 0.28 [0.12, 0.66]; p = 3.54×10 -3 ). Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10 -5 ) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10 -3 ) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. These outcomes were confirmed when eQTLs were employed to represent the effects of antihypertensive medications., Conclusion: The study suggests that CCBs and diuretics could potentially reduce the risk of HT in different populations. Additional research is needed to assess the feasibility of repurposing antihypertensive medications for the prevention of HT., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Cui, Chen, Xu, Mao and Chen.)

Background: While traditional medicine (TM) is employed by a significant portion of the global population for managing health issues, clinical guidelines and state recommendations often overlook this practice. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of use of TM to control 3 metabolic risk factors (MRF): hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and hyperglycaemia; and the sociodemographic, economic, and clinical characteristics associated with the use of TM., Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study that analyses data obtained from a representative population survey in 2 health districts, one urban in the south of Quito and another in a forested rural area with diverse ethnic groups in Esmeraldas, Ecuador. We include 602 individuals with at least one MRF. We calculated the proportion of people reporting the regular use of TM (herbal or traditional remedy) to control their MRF and we assessed potential associations with sociodemographic, economic, and clinical characteristics with a multivariable logistic regression model., Results: In two very different sociocultural contexts in Ecuador we found that use of TM to control MRF was frequent (39.4% in Esmeraldas, 31.1% in Quito), frequently in combination with CM. There is a notable percentage of people, 33.9% in Esmeraldas and 39.0% in Quito, who did not take any treatment for their MRF, and the remainder used CM alone. In both settings, an individual's education lever was significantly associated with TM use. Whereas in Quito individuals with higher education more frequently treated their MRF with TM (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.03-3.90), in the rural, hard-to-reach context of Esmeraldas, it was more frequent among people with no formal schooling (aOR: 3.76; 95%CI 1.59-8.88), as well as those of younger age (aOR by year: 0.97; 95% CI 0.95-0.99) and afro ethnicity (aOR: 2.13; 95%CI 1.02-4.45)., Conclusion: Traditional medicine is used by a significant proportion of the population in Ecuador, highlighting the need for a more accessible and intercultural healthcare approach. The health system should ensure access to the necessary information and resources for the management of their metabolic risk factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing semaglutide reported reductions of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in trial populations with baseline blood pressure in the normotensive range. This study aimed to determine whether this SBP reduction is greater in hypertensive groups., Methods: Individual patient data (IPD) from three RCTs examining the effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on body weight over 68 weeks were included. Trial participants were categorized according to a hypertension diagnosis, treatment or baseline measurement (HTN), baseline SBP > 130 mmHg (HTN130) or >140 mmHg (HTN140), and those with apparent resistant hypertension (RH). The primary analysis compared the in-trial change in SBP in the semaglutide and placebo arms. Alterations of anti-hypertensive medications were quantified by treatment intensity score and compared between arms. These analyses were performed using analysis of covariance., Results: Overall, 3136 participants were included. The difference in SBP change between the treatment (n = 2109) and placebo (n = 1027) groups was -4.95 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.86 to -4.05] overall. This difference was -4.78 mmHg (95% CI -5.97 to -3.59) for HTN, -4.93 mmHg (95% CI -6.75 to -3.11) for HTN130, -4.09 mmHg (95% CI -7.12 to -1.06) for HTN140, and -3.16 mmHg (95% CI -8.69-2.37) for RH. Reduction in SBP was mediated substantially by weight loss. The anti-hypertensive treatment intensity score decreased for those on semaglutide compared to placebo (-0.51; 95% CI -0.71 to -0.32)., Conclusions: This IPD analysis of three large RCTs found blood pressure reductions with semaglutide in participants with hypertension that were similar to those seen in all trial participants. This finding may in part be due to concurrent reductions to anti-hypertensive medications. These results suggest that semaglutide is a useful adjunctive treatment for patients with hypertension and obesity., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Arterial hypertension remains the major cardiovascular risk worldwide. It is estimated that under 50 years of age one in every three adults is hypertensive while beyond the age of 50 the prevalence is almost 50% globally. The latest World Health Organization (WHO) Global Report on Hypertension indicated that the global number of hypertensive patients almost doubled in the last three decades, with related increasing deaths, disability, and costs annually. Because of this global increase, early diagnosis and timely treatment is of great importance. However, based on the WHO Global Report, it is estimated that up to 46% of individuals were never diagnosed. Of those diagnosed, less than 50% were on treatment, with nearly half among these at target according to the current guidelines. It is also important to note that an increasing number of hypertensive patients, despite the use of three or more drugs, still do not achieve a blood pressure normalization, thus defining the clinical scenario of resistant hypertension (RH). This condition is associated to a higher risk of hypertension-mediated organ damage and hospitalization due to acute cardiovascular events. Current guidelines recommend a triple combination therapy (renin angiotensin system blocking agent + a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic + a dihydropyridinic calcium-channel blocker) to all patients with RH. Beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, should be also considered based on concomitant conditions and potential contraindications. Finally, the renal denervation is also proposed in patients with preserved kidney function that remain hypertensive despite the use of maximum tolerated medical treatment. However, the failure of this procedure in the long term and the contraindication in patients with kidney failure is a strong call for a new therapeutic approach. In the present review, we will discuss the pharmacological novelties to come for the management of hypertension and RH in the next future.

Hormone therapy, especially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is effective against prostate cancer (PC), whereas long-term ADT is a risk for metabolic/cardiovascular disorders including diabetes (DM), hypertension (HT) and dyslipidemia (DL), and might result in progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We thus conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to ask whether CRPC progression would be associated positively with HT, DM or DL and negatively with statins prescribed for treatment of DL. In this study, 1,112 nonmetastatic PC patients undergoing ADT were enrolled. Univariate statistical analyses clearly showed significant association of HT or DM developing after ADT onset, though not preexisting HT or DM, with early CRPC progression. On the other hand, preexisting DL or statin use, but not newly developed DL or started statin prescriptions following ADT, was negatively associated with CRPC progression. Multivariate analysis revealed significant independent association of the newly developed DM or HT, or preexisting statin use with CRPC progression [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals): 3.85 (1.65-8.98), p = 0.002; 2.75 (1.36-5.59), p = 0.005; 0.25 (0.09-0.72), p = 0.010, respectively]. Together, ADT-related development of HT or DM and preexisting statin use are considered to have positive and negative impact on CRPC progression, respectively., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Antihypertensive drugs are known to lower cardiovascular mortality, but the role of different types of antihypertensive drugs in lifespan has not been clarified. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear., Methods and Results: To minimize confounding, we used Mendelian randomization to assess the role of different antihypertensive drug classes in longevity and examined the pathways via proteins. Genetic variants associated with systolic blood pressure (SBP) corresponding to drug-target genes were used as genetic instruments. The genetic associations with lifespan were obtained from a large genome-wide association study including 1 million European participants from UK Biobank and LifeGen. For significant antihypertensive drug classes, we performed sex-specific analysis, drug-target analysis, and colocalization. To examine the mediation pathways, we assessed the associations of 2291 plasma proteins with lifespan, and examined the associations of drug classes with the proteins affecting lifespan. After correcting for multiple testing, genetically proxied beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and vasodilators were related to longer life years (BBs: 2.03, 95% CI 0.78-3.28 per 5 mmHg reduction in SBP, CCBs: 3.40, 95% CI 1.47-5.33, and vasodilators: 2.92, 95% CI 1.08-4.77). The beneficial effects of BBs and CCBs were more obvious in men. ADRB1, CACNA2D2, CACNB3, CPT1A, CPT2, and EDNRA genes were related to extended lifespan, with CPT2 further supported by colocalization evidence. Eighty-six proteins were related to lifespan, of which four proteins were affected by CCBs. CDH1 may mediate the association between CCBs and lifespan., Conclusions: Beta-blockers, CCBs, and vasodilators may prolong lifespan, with potential sex differences for BBs and CCBs. The role of CCBs in lifespan is partly mediated by CDH1. Prioritizing the potential protein targets can provide new insights into healthy aging., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Effective antihypertensive therapy is essential for achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control and reducing cardiovascular events. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a combination of amlodipine (AML) and candesartan cilexetil (CC) versus AML monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension (HTN). After a 4-week run-in period with AML 5 mg, patients whose HTN remained uncontrolled (diastolic BP [DBP]) ≥ 90 mmHg and < 120 mmHg) were randomized to receive either AML + CC or AML alone for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in DBP and systolic BP (SBP). The primary safety measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A total of 174 participants were included in the efficacy analysis. After 8 weeks, DBP decreased by -9.92 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML + CC arm and - 2.08 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). SBP decreased by -14.27 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML + CC arm versus - 2.77 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). AEs occurred in 11.24% of the AML + CC group and 5.62% of the AML group (p = 0.1773). AML + CC combination therapy demonstrated superior efficacy with good tolerance, making it a promising option for patients with inadequately controlled hypertension on amlodipine alone., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The recent guidelines issued by the European Society of Hypertension reaffirmed that the degree of control of hypertension remains suboptimal worldwide. In order to increase the proportion of well-controlled patients, in addition to nonpharmacological measures, it is necessary to improve the implementation of drug therapy in the clinical practice as much as possible. Initial therapy should almost always be based on the combination, free or fixed, between ACE inhibitor drugs, or direct angiotensin II inhibitors ('sartans') and diuretics (thiazide or thiazide-like) or calcium channel blockers at the maximum recommended and well-tolerated dose. The combination of the thiazide-like diuretic indapamide with the ACE inhibitor delapril has shown, based on numerous clinical trials and meta-analyses, very good results in terms of antihypertensive efficacy, tolerability, and prevention or regression of organ damage. Indapamide is a thiazide-like diuretic also endowed with direct vasodilator effect and long duration of action. A meta-analysis of 19 randomized clinical trials demonstrated a greater reduction in the incidence of cardiac events, stroke and heart failure with thiazide-like diuretics than with thiazide diuretics. Delapril is a non-sulfhydryl ACE-inhibitor with high affinity for converting enzyme at the cardiac, pulmonary, and peripheral vascular levels. Being strongly lipophilic, delapril inhibits the ACE enzyme at the tissue level more potently than other ACE inhibitors. A peculiar feature of delapril is its weak bradykinin-enhancing effect due to its higher affinity for the C site than the N site of ACE, resulting in a lower incidence of cough and angioneurotic edema compared with other ACE inhibitors. In some meta-analyses, the pressor reduction was statistically, greater with the delapril-indapamide combination than with combinations between hydrochlorothiazide and ACE inhibitors. The combination consists of divisible tablets containing 30 mg delapril and 2.5 mg indapamide, and its pharmacological and clinical properties are not affected by simultaneous food intake. The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination, as well as its components, persists for the entire 24 hours. The recent alarming reports on the incidence of skin cancer during treatment with hydrochlorothiazide should also be a guide in clinical practice toward the preferential choice of a thiazide-like diuretic such as chlorthalidone or indapamide to replace hydrochlorothiazide.

As a key molecule for improving cardiovascular diseases, Apelin-13 was surveyed in this work to explain its actions in controlling inflammation, pyroptosis, and myocardial hypertrophy. First, mouse models with myocardial hypertrophy were established. Then, assessments were made on the pathological variation in the heart of mouse, on the cardiac functions, as well as on the expressions of cardiac hypertrophy markers (β-MHC, ANP, and BNP), inflammatory factors (TNF-α, COX2, IL-6, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1), myocardial cell pyroptosis markers (NLRP3, ASC, c-caspase-1, and GSDMD-N), and Hippo pathway proteins (p-YAP, YAP, LATS1, and p-LATS1) by HE staining, echocardiography scanning, and western blot tests separately. The expressions of such inflammatory factors as in myocardial tissue were acquired by ELISA. After inducing the phenotype of H9c2 cell hypertrophy by noradrenaline, we used CCK-8 kits to know about the activity of H9c2 cells treated with Apelin-13, and performed ɑ-actinin staining to measure the changes in volumes of such cells. As unraveled through this work, Apelin-13 refrained the activation of the Hippo pathway, which in turn attenuated the hypertrophy, inflammation, and pyroptosis of myocardial tissue and H9c2 cells. Hence, Apelin-13 can be considered as a target for hypertension treatment., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Management of essential hypertension (HTN) remains challenging, with contemporary control being achieved in <1/10 of the cases, especially when aligned with the recently updated guidelines of American College of Cardiology (ACC) or International Society of Hypertension (ISH). The place and positioning of beta-blockers have been evolving, with recent focused updates, such as the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) 2023 guidelines, that may hold relevance for the Indian phenotypic traits of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD), fragile coronary architecture, and/or high resting heart rate. To further develop consensus on the clinical role and relevance of beta-blockers, including nebivolol, an Indian consensus was evolved with graded recommendations on their clinical role in HTN, HTN with additional cardiovascular (CV) risk, or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methodology: An expert review panel was constituted, comprising interventional and clinical cardiologists as experts, to synthesize the literature for the development of a validated knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) survey questionnaire. Research databases, including Cochrane Systematic Reviews, PubMed, and Google Scholar, were accessed for contemporary information and guidelines on beta-blockers updated until Dec 2023. Delphi rounds were conducted to develop graded recommendations based on the strength, quality of evidence, and the agreement among the panelists ( n = 9). Consensus was achieved on the graded recommendations, with ≥70% of national panelists in agreement., Results: Ninety-six percent of respondents opined that the new ESH HTN guidelines (2023) help gain confidence in using beta-blockers, which are considered first-line drugs for the treatment of HTN. Beta-blockers, including nebivolol, can be recommended in patients with HTN with high resting heart rates, including young hypertensive patients under 40 years of age. For people under 60 years old with HTN, regardless of whether they have comorbid diseases, beta-blockers are the recommended drug choice. Ninety-five percent of respondents opined that nebivolol is the preferred beta-blocker in hypertensive patients with T2DM, followed by bisoprolol and metoprolol. More than 90% of respondents opined that the three most commonly preferred beta-blockers by experts in patients with angina were nebivolol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol., Conclusion: Beta-blockers, including nebivolol, can be considered initial-line therapy for HTN management in real-life settings in India and nebivolol is preferred because of its two important properties: highest beta-1 selectivity and endothelial-dependent vasodilation., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2024.)

Competing Interests: None.

Competing Interests: None.

The authors investigated the antihypertensive effect of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) when switching from other drugs and assessed whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or plasma renin activity (PRA) before drug switching was a predictor of blood pressure lowering after switching to Sac/Val. In 92 patients with treated hypertension, clinic blood pressure, plasma BNP, and PRA were examined before and after switching to Sac/Val. Clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly decreased after drug switching to Sac/Val (p < .0001, respectively). The level before drug switching of BNP had no correlation with the change in systolic blood pressure (Δ-SBP) before and after switching to Sac/Val, but that of PRA was significantly correlated with Δ-SBP (r = .3807, p = .0002). A multiple regression analysis revealed that PRA before drug switching was an independent determinant of Δ-SBP. Our findings suggest that low PRA may become a useful marker to predict the antihypertensive effect of switching to Sac/Val in treated hypertensive patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The coexistence of diabetes and hypertension is prevalent due to shared risk factors. Pharmacological treatment has been reported to be effective in managing both conditions. However, treatment effectiveness depends on the extent to which a patient adheres to their treatment. Poor adherence to long-term treatment for chronic diseases is a growing global problem of significant magnitude. Several interventions have been developed to help improve medication adherence in patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension. This review aimed to determine the characteristics of these interventions and their impact on medication adherence., Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO International Registry of Systematic Reviews. Studies were searched in the databases CINAHL, Embase and Medline to identify relevant articles published during 2012-2023. The search concepts included 'medication adherence', 'hypertension', 'diabetes' and 'intervention'. Studies were included if they were in English and evaluated the impact of an intervention aimed at promoting adherence to medications for both diabetes and hypertension., Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, with five demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in medication adherence. Of the five studies that improved medication adherence, four were multifaceted and one was a single-component intervention. All successful interventions addressed at least two factors influencing non-adherence. Patient education was the foundation of most of the successful interventions, supported by other strategies, such as follow-ups and reminders., Conclusion: Multifaceted interventions that also included patient education had a positive impact on medication adherence in patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension. Improving adherence in patients with coexisting diabetes and hypertension requires a multipronged approach that considers the range of factors impacting medication-taking., Patient or Public Contribution: This systematic review provides comprehensive insights into the benefits of patient-centred approaches in intervention development and strengthening. Such patient involvement ensures that medication adherence interventions are more relevant, acceptable and effective, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and more meaningful patient engagement in healthcare research., (© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: With the high burden of hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa, there is a need for effective, safe and scalable treatment strategies., Objective: To compare, among Black African adults, the effectiveness and safety of a novel low-dose triple-pill protocol compared with a standard-care protocol for blood pressure lowering., Design and Setting: Randomized, parallel-group, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in public hospital-based family medicine clinics in Nigeria., Participants: Black African adults with uncontrolled hypertension (≥140/90 mm Hg) who were untreated or receiving a single blood pressure-lowering drug., Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to low-dose triple-pill or standard-care protocols. The triple-pill protocol involved a novel combination of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in triple one-quarter, one-half, and standard doses (ie, 10/1.25/0.625 mg, 20/2.5/1.25 mg, and 40/5/2.5 mg), with accelerated up-titration. The standard-care protocol was the Nigeria hypertension treatment protocol starting with amlodipine (5 mg)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary effectiveness outcome was the reduction in home mean systolic blood pressure, and the primary safety outcome was discontinuation of trial treatment due to adverse events, both from randomization to month 6., Results: The first participant was randomized on July 19, 2022, and the last follow-up visit was on July 18, 2024. Among 300 randomized participants (54% female; mean age, 52 years; baseline mean home blood pressure, 151/97 mm Hg; and clinic blood pressure, 156/97 mm Hg), 273 (91%) completed the trial. At month 6, mean home systolic blood pressure was on average 31 mm Hg (95% CI, 28 to 33 mm Hg) lower in the triple-pill protocol group and 26 mm Hg (95% CI, 22 to 28 mm Hg) lower in the standard-care protocol group (adjusted difference, -5.8 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.0 to -3.6]; P < .001]). At month 6, clinic blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 82% vs 72% (risk difference, 10% [95% CI, -2% to 20%]) and home blood pressure control (<130/80 mm Hg) was 62% vs 28% (risk difference, 33% [95% CI, 22% to 44%]) in the triple-pill compared with the standard-care protocol group; these were 2 of 21 prespecified secondary effectiveness end points. No participants discontinued trial treatment due to adverse events., Conclusions and Relevance: Among Black African adults with uncontrolled hypertension, a low-dose triple-pill protocol achieved better blood pressure lowering and control with good tolerability compared with the standard-care protocol., Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: PACTR202107579572114.

Since the effects of once-daily antihypertensive (HT) medications are more pronounced within the first few hours of ingestion, evening administration of anti-HT medications can be a feasible treatment for nocturnal HT. However, no relevant meta-analysis has been conducted in patients with nocturnal HT. This meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials involving patients with elevated mean nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and compared evening anti-HT administration with morning administration. Multiple databases, including grey literature (e.g. clincialtrial.gov), were searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two independent authors. Risk of bias assessment and overall quality of evidence were conducted using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and GRADE by two independent authors. A total of 107 studies were included, 76 of which were investigated in China and had not been identified in previous reviews. Only one trial was ranked low risk-of-bias. Evening administration of anti-HT medications was effective in reducing nocturnal systolic BP (4.12-9.10 mmHg; I2 = 80.5-95.2%) and diastolic BP (3.38-5.87 mmHg; I2 = 87.4-95.6%). Subgroup analyses found that the effectiveness of evening administration was contributed by data from the Hermida group and China. Evening administration did not provide additional nocturnal/daytime/24-h BP reduction in non-Hermida/non-China studies (I2 = 0) and in meta-analyses that included studies with unclear or low risk of bias. The effectiveness of nocturnal BP reduction was similar across different types, doses, and half-lives of medications. Evening administration of anti-HT medications may reduce proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), nondipping and morning surge. The overall quality of evidence was ranked as very low to low. Our results highlight the scarcity of low risk-of-bias studies and emphasize the need for such trials to evaluate the efficacy of evening dosing of anti-HT medications as a standard treatment for patients with nocturnal HT across diverse populations., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Few studies have reported on the accuracy of self-reported hypertension history among older postmenopausal women, which was this study's objective. Participants were postmenopausal women enrolled in the Osteoporosis and Periodontal Disease (OsteoPerio) study, an ancillary investigation of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS) at the Buffalo, New York, clinical site. Participants self-reported their history of physician diagnosed hypertension treated with medication at WHI-OS enrollment (1993-1998; n = 1342, mean age 63 years), then 3 years later at OsteoPerio enrollment (1997-2001; n = 1342), and again at OsteoPerio Year 5 follow-up (2002-2005; n = 1020). At each time point, medication inventories were recorded and served as the criterion with which self-report was compared in the present study. Physician diagnosed-treated hypertension was also self-reported annually on mailed health update questionnaires in the WHI-OS and were compared against medication inventory at the subsequent clinic exam. Of those participants who self-reported a history of hypertension at WHI enrollment, OsteoPerio enrollment, and OsteoPerio Year 5 follow-up, 41.2%, 90.3%, and 94.4%, respectively, had anti-hypertensive pills in their medication inventory. Across the three time points, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.72 to 0.98 and from 0.85 to 0.95, and kappa coefficients ranged from 0.52 to 0.79 when comparing self-report with medication inventory. For self-reported newly physician-diagnosed and treated hypertension on the annual health update questionnaire, 88.4% and 95.2% of those reporting hypertension had anti-hypertensive pills in the subsequent medication inventory. In general, sensitivity and kappa were lower in women aged ≥70 versus < 70 years and in those with history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes compared to those without these comorbidities. In this cohort of postmenopausal women, self-reported physician diagnosed and treated hypertension demonstrated moderate to high accuracy when compared against anti-hypertensive medication use documented by pill inventory, particularly for those who were younger and managing fewer comorbidities., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: To study the association between the use of drugs for hypertension or heart failure, particularly diuretics, and risk of death in COVID-19., Methods: We conducted a cohort study, based on record linked individual-based data from national registers, of all Swedish inhabitants 50 years and older (n = 3,909,321) at the start of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. The association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), thiazides, loop diuretics, aldosterone antagonists, beta blocking agents and calcium channel blockers at the index date 6 March 2020, and death in COVID-19 during 7 March to 31 July 2020, was analysed using Cox-proportional hazards regression, adjusted for a wide range of possible confounders., Results: Use of loop diuretics was associated with higher risk [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.17-1.35] and thiazides with reduced risk (0.78; 0.69-0.88) of death in COVID-19. In addition, lower risk was observed for ACEI and higher risk for beta-blocking agents, although both associations were weak. For ARB, aldosterone antagonists and calcium channel blockers no significant associations were found., Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort of nearly 4 million persons 50 years and older, the use of loop diuretics was associated with increased risk of death in COVID-19 during the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in Sweden. This contrasted to the decreased risk observed for thiazides. As treatment with loop diuretics is common, particularly in the elderly, the group most affected by severe COVID-19, this finding merit further investigation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: It has been suggested that nitrate-rich beetroot juice (BRJ) reduces blood pressure (BP) in various populations. We aimed to investigate the effect of BRJ on BP in adults with hypertension according to the European Society of Hypertension Guidelines (clinical BP ≥ 140/≥ 90 mmHg) and whether BRJ can be considered as an adjunct to hypertension drug treatment, by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials., Data Synthesis: PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline Ovid, Cinahl, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception until April 13, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials of BRJ versus placebo, water, or no intake. Risk of bias was assessed using a standardized appraisal instrument from the Swedish Agency for Health Technology and Assessment of Social Services, which is based on the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The pooled BP effect size was calculated using random effects models and meta-regression. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Eleven trials (349 patients) were included. BRJ yielded a significant reduction in clinical systolic BP compared with placebo mean difference (MD) -5.31 mmHg (95% CI -7.46, -3.16; I 2  = 64%, GRADE ⊕⊕OO). There was no significant effect on clinical diastolic BP or 24-h BP outcomes, and the heterogeneity was moderate to high., Conclusions: Daily ingestion of 200-800 mg of nitrate from BRJ may reduce clinical systolic BP in hypertensive individuals with no sign of development of tolerance. Certainty of evidence is low, and results should be interpreted with caution., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The microbiota-derived short chain fatty acid butyrate has been shown to lower blood pressure (BP) in rodent studies. Nonetheless, the net effect of butyrate on hypertension in humans remains uncovered. In this study, for the first time, we aimed to determine the effect of oral butyrate on BP in patients with hypertension., Methods: We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial including 23 patients with hypertension. Antihypertensive medication was discontinued for the duration of the study with a washout period of 4 weeks before starting the intervention. Participants received daily oral capsules containing either sodium butyrate or placebo with an equivalent dosage of sodium chloride for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was daytime 24-hour systolic BP. Differences between groups over time were assessed using linear mixed models (group-by-time interaction)., Results: Study participants (59.0±3.7 years; 56.5% female) had an average baseline office systolic BP of 143.5±14.6 mm Hg and diastolic BP of 93.0±8.3 mm Hg. Daytime 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP significantly increased over the intervention period in the butyrate compared with the placebo group, with an increase of +9.63 (95% CI, 2.02-17.20) mm Hg in daytime 24-hour systolic BP and +5.08 (95% CI, 1.34-8.78) mm Hg in diastolic BP over 4 weeks. Butyrate levels significantly increased in plasma, but not in feces, upon butyrate intake, underscoring its absorption., Conclusions: Four-week treatment with oral butyrate increased daytime systolic and diastolic BP in subjects with hypertension. Our findings implicate that butyrate does not have beneficial effects on human hypertension, which warrants caution in future butyrate intervention studies., Registration: URL: https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/; Unique identifier: NL8924., Competing Interests: M. Nieuwdorp is on the scientific board at Caelus Pharmaceuticals, the Netherlands. S.L. Hazen reports being named as a coinventor on pending and issued patents held by the Cleveland Clinic relating to cardiovascular diagnostics and therapeutics, being a paid consultant formerly for Procter & Gamble, and currently being with Zehna Therapeutics. He also reports having received research funds from Procter & Gamble, Zehna Therapeutics, and Roche Diagnostics and being eligible to receive royalty payments for inventions or discoveries related to cardiovascular diagnostics or therapeutics from Cleveland HeartLab, a wholly owned subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics, Procter & Gamble, and Zehna Therapeutics. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: UMOD (uromodulin) has been linked to hypertension through potential activation of Na + -K + -2Cl - cotransporter (NKCC2), a target of loop diuretics. We posited that hypertensive patients carrying the rs13333226-AA UMOD genotype would demonstrate greater blood pressure responses to loop diuretics, potentially mediated by this UMOD/NKCC2 interaction., Methods: This prospective, multicenter, genotype-blinded trial evaluated torasemide (torsemide) efficacy on systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction over 16 weeks in nondiabetic, hypertensive participants uncontrolled on ≥1 nondiuretic antihypertensive for >3 months. The primary end point was the change in 24-hour ambulatory SBP (ABPM SBP) and SBP response trajectories between baseline and 16 weeks by genotype (AA versus AG/GG) due to nonrandomized groups at baseline (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03354897)., Results: Of 251 enrolled participants, 222 received torasemide and 174 demonstrated satisfactory treatment adherence and had genotype data. The study participants were middle-aged (59±11 years), predominantly male (62%), obese (body mass index, 32±7 kg/m 2 ), with normal eGFR (92±17 mL/min/1.73 m²) and an average baseline ABPM of 138/81 mm Hg. Significant reductions in mean ABPM SBP were observed in both groups after 16 weeks (AA, -6.57 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.44 to -4.69]; P <0.0001; AG/GG, -3.22 [95% CI, -5.93 to -0.51]; P =0.021). The change in mean ABPM SBP (baseline to 16 weeks) showed a difference of -3.35 mm Hg ([95% CI, -6.64 to -0.05]; P =0.048) AA versus AG/GG genotypes. The AG/GG group displayed a rebound in SBP from 8 weeks, differing from the consistent decrease in the AA group ( P =0.004 for difference in trajectories)., Conclusions: Our results confirm a plausible interaction between UMOD and NKCC2 and suggest a potential role for genotype-guided use of loop diuretics in hypertension management., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03354897., Competing Interests: I.S. Mackenzie is a member of the British Heart Foundation Clinical Studies Committee. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background/objective: Slowing the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is critical. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to target risk factors for DKD progression., Methods: We evaluated the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention focused on supporting healthy behaviors, medication management, and self-monitoring on decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for 36 months compared with an educational control., Results: We randomized 138 individuals to the intervention group and 143 to control. At baseline, mean (SD) eGFR was 80.7 (21.7) mL/min/1.73m 2 , 56% of participants had chronic kidney disease and a history of uncontrolled hypertension with a baseline SBP of 134.3 mm Hg. The mean (SD) decline in eGFR by cystatin C from baseline to 36 months was 5.0 (19.6) and 5.9 (18.6) mL/min/1.73m 2 for the control and intervention groups, respectively, with no significant between-group difference ( P =0.75)., Conclusions: We did not observe a significant difference in clinical outcomes by study arm. However, we showed that individuals with DKD will engage in a pharmacist-led intervention. The potential explanations for a lack of change in DKD risk factors can be attributed to 5 broad issues, challenges: (1) associated with enrolling patients with low eGFR and poor BP control; (2) implementing the intervention; (3) limited duration during which to observe any clinical benefit from the intervention; (4) potential co-intervention or contamination; and (5) low statistical power., Competing Interests: This study was supported by funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (1R01DK93938.). H.B. reports research grants from the PhRMA Foundation, Proteus Digital Health, Otsuka, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Improved Patient Outcomes, as well as consulting from Sanofi, Novartis, Otsuka, Abbott, Preventric Diagnostics, and the Medicines Company. U.D.P. was supported by R01DK093938, R34DK102166, and P30DK096493 before joining Gilead Sciences in 2016. C.A.D. was partially supported by UL1TR002553, the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award at Duke. J.P. was partially supported by P30AG02871615, the NIA Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center Award at Duke. H.B. was partially supported by U24-HL137907 and U24-DK065176. A.A.L. reports receiving funds from Otsuka and PhRMA Foundation, and is supported by VA HSR&D grant #18-234. M.J.C. reports funding from the National Institutes of Health (1R01NR019594-01), the Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (VA QUE 20-012), and the Veterans Affairs Office of Rural Health. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

This review highlights the molecular basis of salt sensitivity in hypertension, with a focus on the regulation of sodium transport in the distal nephron. Sodium reabsorption in this region is often linked to the actions of aldosterone, although in recent years numerous findings have been reported on the aldosterone-independent pathway of acquiring salt sensitivity by potassium deficiency or potassium loading. The key to this discussion is the interplay, through extracellular potassium concentration, between the first part of the tubules expressing the Na + -Cl - cotransporter (NCC) and the second part expressing the epithelial Na + channel (ENaC). The molecular pathways such as with-no-lysine 1 (WNK)-STE20/SPS1-related proline-alanine-rich kinase (SPAK)/oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1 (OSR1) signaling, Kelch-like family member 3 (KLHL3)-cullin 3 (CUL3) complex, protein phosphatases, and mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2)-Nedd4L pathway are described as the mechanism by which salt sensitivity on blood pressure is acquired in response to changes in physiological conditions including potassium depletion or loading. This review highlights the potential for targeting these molecular pathways to develop novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of salt-sensitive hypertension, the mechanism of which remains to be elucidated.

The Sir Stanley Peart Essay Competition is an annual event run by the British and Irish Hypertension Society to encourage Early Career Researchers to continue the ethos of Sir Stanley Peart. Sir Stanley Peart was a clinician and clinical researcher who made a major contribution to our understanding of blood pressure regulation. He was the first to demonstrate the release of noradrenaline in response to sympathetic nerve stimulation. He was also the first to purify, and determine the structure of, angiotensin and he later isolated the enzyme, renin, and carried out many important investigations of the factors controlling its release in the body. This year, the essay topic was "Do we need new classes of antihypertensive drugs?". In her prize-winning essay, "Deeds not words": the forgotten class, Dr Jenner proposes that there is a need to address the unmet needs of hypertensive women, to increase their involvement in clinical trials and develop antihypertensives that are fit for purpose. Dr Jenner proposes that women are therefore the perfect class for new antihypertensives., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A significant number of individuals being treated for hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure (BP). In Japan, renal denervation (RDN) is being introduced into clinical practice as an adjunctive treatment for hypertension that is uncontrolled despite adequate lifestyle changes and maximal antihypertensive drug therapy. The pivotal SPYRAL ON-MED trial showed that there was a significant reduction in trough office and nighttime ambulatory BP values in the RDN group compared with sham control group, although 24-h and daytime BP values were not significantly different between the two groups. The trough office BP measurement (taken before morning antihypertensive dosing) is similar to guideline recommendations for taking morning home BP before taking the morning antihypertensive drug dose. Recent guidelines recommend the measurement of nighttime BP because nighttime BP is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular event risk than daytime BP. It is particularly important to assess nighttime BP in medicated individuals with hypertension because the up- or down-titration of antihypertensive drug dosing is primarily based on office and daytime BPs in clinical practice. This means that there may be significant risk relating to nocturnal hypertension during longer follow-up. Because RDN results in persistent, "always-on" 24-h BP-lowering effects, the best BP metrics to assess the potential benefit of RDN are nighttime BP (determined using home or ambulatory BP monitoring) and morning BP (determined using home BP monitoring or morning trough office BP measurement). The variability of office, home, and ambulatory BP values is another important metric to assess the quality of RDN-related BP lowering., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Hypertension.)

High-quality randomized trial evidence is lacking on whether low-dose aspirin exerts significant effects on blood pressure (BP) in older adults. The authors assessed longitudinal BP changes in participants enrolled in ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg daily aspirin in 19 114 community-dwelling Australian and U.S. adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD), dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. Participants' BP was recorded at baseline and annual study visits, and managed by their usual care provider. BP trajectories for aspirin versus placebo during 4.7 years of follow-up were examined for systolic and diastolic BP separately, using linear mixed models to account for between and within-individual variability in BP. Analyses by subgroups were also explored with inclusion of interaction terms in the models. The difference in mean change in systolic BP between aspirin and placebo during study follow-up was -0.03 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.13, 0.07; p = .541) (aspirin minus placebo), while the mean difference for change in diastolic BP was -0.05 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.11, 0.01; p = .094). These small, non-significant differences in BP change between the aspirin and placebo groups were consistent across baseline levels of BP and antihypertensive treatment status (treated/untreated). Likewise, subgroups of age, sex, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and frailty revealed no interaction effect between the subgroup, aspirin treatment, and time. Interval-censored Cox proportional hazards regression showed no difference in rates of incident treated hypertension between aspirin and placebo-treated participants. The authors conclude that daily low-dose aspirin does not significantly affect BP in older adults when managed by usual care., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Multimorbidity frequently occurs in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). The co-occurrence of comorbidities often follows specific patterns., Objectives: This study investigated multimorbidity subtypes and their associations with clinical outcomes., Methods: From the prospective RELAX-AHF-2 (Relaxin for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure-2) trial, 6,545 patients (26% with HF with preserved ejection fraction, defined as LVEF ≥50%) were classified into multimorbidity groups using latent class analysis. The association between subgroups and clinical outcomes was examined. Validation of these findings was conducted in the RELAX-AHF trial, which comprised 1,161 patients., Results: Five distinct multimorbidity groups emerged: 1) diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (often male, high prevalence of CKD and diabetes mellitus); 2) ischemic (ischemic HF); 3) elderly/atrial fibrillation (AF) (oldest, high prevalence of AF); 4) metabolic (obese, hypertensive, more often HF with preserved ejection fraction); and 5) young (fewest comorbidities). After adjusting for confounders, patients in the diabetes and CKD (HR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.50-2.20), elderly/AF (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.20-1.70), and metabolic (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.20-1.80) groups had higher rates of the composite outcome than patients in the young group, primarily driven by differences in rehospitalization. Treatment allocation (placebo or serelaxin) modified these associations (P interaction  <0.001). Serelaxin-treated patients in the young group were associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40-0.90). Similarly, patients from the RELAX-AHF trial clustered in 5 multimorbidity groups. The clinical characteristics and associations with outcomes could also be validated., Conclusions: Comorbidities naturally clustered into 5 mutually exclusive groups in RELAX-AHF-2, showing variations in clinical outcomes. These data emphasize that the specific combination of comorbidities can influence adverse outcomes and treatment responses in patients with AHF., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the PROMINENT project (funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 754425). Dr Tromp is supported by the National University of Singapore Start-up grant, the tier 1 grant from the ministry of education, and the CS-IRG New Investigator Grant from the National Medical Research Council; has received consulting or speaker fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Diagnostics, and Us2.ai; and owns patent US-10702247-B2 unrelated to the present work. Drs Cotter and Davison are employees of Momentum Research, Inc, which has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Celyad, Cirius Therapeutics Inc, Corteria Pharmaceuticals, Roche Diagnostics Inc, Sanofi, Windtree Therapeutics Inc, and XyloCor Therapeutics. Dr Felker has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapeutics, and Whiteswell; and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. Dr Gimpelewicz is an employee of Novartis. Dr Greenberg is a consultant for or on the advisory board of AstraZeneca, Bayer, Ionis, Merck, Mesoblast, and Tenaya; and has been on the Data Safety Monitoring Board of ACI, Axon, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Boehringer Ingelheim, EBR Systems, Faraday, Inventiva, Impulse Dynamics, Ionis, Salubris, Vifor, Viking, and Windtree. Dr Lam is supported by a Clinician Scientist Award from the National Medical Research Council of Singapore; has received research support from Bayer and Roche Diagnostics; has served as consultant or on the Advisory Board/Steering Committee/Executive Committee for Actelion, Alleviant Medical, Allysta Pharma, Amgen, AnaCardio AB, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Cytokinetics, Darma Inc, EchoNous Inc, Eli Lilly, Impulse Dynamics, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Janssen Research & Development LLC, Medscape/WebMD Global LLC, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ProSciento Inc, Radcliffe Group Ltd, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, and Us2.ai; and serves as co-founder and nonexecutive director of Us2.ai. Dr Voors has received research support and/or has been a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Merck, MyoKardia, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics. Dr Metra received personal fees of minimal amounts in the last 3 years from Actelion, Amgen, LivaNova, and Vifor pharma as a member of Executive or Data Monitoring Committees of sponsored clinical trials; and from AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Edwards Therapeutics for participation on advisory boards and/or speeches at sponsored meetings. Dr Teerlink has received research support and/or has been a consultant for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Servier, and Windtree Therapeutics. Dr van der Meer received grant support and/or consultancy fees from Novartis, Pharma Nord, Pfizer, Ionis, Astra Zeneca, Vifor Pharma, Pharmacosmos, BridgeBio, and Novo Nordisk. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)