Search

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.08.038 Byline: Vincent L. Biron (a), Kirk J. McManus (b), Ninghe Hu (a), Michael J. Hendzel (b), D. Alan Underhill (a) Keywords: Histone; Methylation; Chromatin; Development; Epigenetics; Histone methyltransferase Abstract: Histone methylation acts as an epigenetic regulator of chromatin activity through the modification of arginine and lysine residues on histones H3 and H4. In the case of lysine, this includes the formation of mono-, di-, or trimethyl groups, each of which is presumed to represent a distinct functional state at the cellular level. To examine the potential developmental roles of these modifications, we determined the global patterns of lysine methylation involving K9 on histone H3 and K20 on histone H4 in midgestation mouse embryos. For each lysine target site, we observed distinct subnuclear distributions of the mono- and trimethyl versions in 10T1/2 cells that were conserved within primary cultures and within the 3D-tissue architecture of the embryo. Interestingly, three of these modifications, histone H3 trimethyl K9, histone H4 monomethyl K20, and histone H4 trimethyl K20 exhibited marked differences in their distribution within the neuroepithelium. Specifically, both histone H3 trimethyl K9 and H4 monomethyl K20 were elevated in proliferating cells of the neural tube, which in the case of the K9 modification was limited to mitotic cells on the luminal surface. In contrast, histone H4 trimethyl K20 was progressively lost from these medial regions and became enriched in differentiating neurons in the ventrolateral neural tube. The inverse relationship of histone H4 K20 methyl derivatives is even more striking during skeletal and cardiac myogenesis where the accumulation of the trimethyl modification in pericentromeric heterochromatin suggests a role in gene silencing in postmitotic muscle cells. Importantly, our results establish that histone lysine methylation occurs in a highly dynamic manner that is consistent with their function in an epigenetic program for cell division and differentiation. Author Affiliation: (a) Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Canada T6G 2H7 (b) Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2 Article History: Received 7 May 2004; Revised 19 August 2004; Accepted 19 August 2004

Author(s): Melody A. Lever [1]; John P. H. Th'ng [2]; Xuejun Sun [1]; Michael J. Hendzel (corresponding author) [1] The considerable length of DNA in eukaryotic genomes requires packaging into [...]

The distribution of Topoisomerase II alpha (Topo II) within the centromere from monolayer cultures of human, mouse L929, rat, Indian muntjac, rat kangaroo and wallaby revealed that Topo II distribution in the centromere is species-dependent. The Topo II inhibitor ICRF-193 blocked the accumulation of Topo II at the centromere, resulting in the disruption of centromere/kinetochore structure.

Abstract Background Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) catalyze the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr), a post-translational modification involved in several important biological processes, namely surveillance of genome integrity, cell cycle progression, initiation of the DNA damage response, apoptosis, and regulation of transcription. Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), on the other hand, catabolizes pADPr and thereby accounts for the transient nature of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation. Our investigation of the interactomes of PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARG by affinity-purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) aimed, on the one hand, to confirm current knowledge on these interactomes and, on the other hand, to discover new protein partners which could offer insights into PARPs and PARG functions. Results PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARG were immunoprecipitated from human cells, and pulled-down proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis prior to in-gel trypsin digestion. Peptides were identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Our AP-MS experiments resulted in the identifications of 179 interactions, 139 of which are novel interactions. Gene Ontology analysis of the identified protein interactors points to five biological processes in which PARP-1, PARP-2 and PARG may be involved: RNA metabolism for PARP-1, PARP-2 and PARG; DNA repair and apoptosis for PARP-1 and PARP-2; and glycolysis and cell cycle for PARP-1. Conclusions This study reveals several novel protein partners for PARP-1, PARP-2 and PARG. It provides a global view of the interactomes of these proteins as well as a roadmap to establish the systems biology of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism.

Abstract Background Within chromatin, the histone variant H2A.Z plays a role in many diverse nuclear processes including transcription, preventing the spread of heterochromatin and epigenetic transcriptional memory. The molecular mechanisms of how H2A.Z mediates its effects are not entirely understood. However, it is now known that H2A.Z has two protein isoforms in vertebrates, H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2, which are encoded by separate genes and differ by 3 amino acid residues. Results We report that H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2 are expressed across a wide range of human tissues, they are both acetylated at lysine residues within the N-terminal region and they exhibit similar, but nonidentical, distributions within chromatin. Our results suggest that H2A.Z-2 preferentially associates with H3 trimethylated at lysine 4 compared to H2A.Z-1. The phylogenetic analysis of the promoter regions of H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2 indicate that they have evolved separately during vertebrate evolution. Conclusions Our biochemical, gene expression, and phylogenetic data suggest that the H2A.Z-1 and H2A.Z-2 variants function similarly yet they may have acquired a degree of functional independence.

The kinetic modeling of H1 recovery curves obtained during fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments are utilized to determine the impact of core histone acetylation on the different variants of H1. The hyperacetylation of core histones are found to affect the cooperative nature of low-affinity H1 binding, with some variants undergoing a predicted decrease of almost 2 orders of magnitude.

Purpose: The cellular response to DNA damage occurs in the context of an organized chromatin environment in order to maintain genome integrity. Immediately after DNA damage, an array of histone modifications are induced to relieve the physical constraints of the chromatin environment, mark the site as damaged, and function as a platform for the assembly of mediator and effector proteins of DNA damage response signaling pathway. Changes in chromatin structure in the vicinity of the DNA double-strand break (DSB) facilitates the efficient initiation of the DNA damage signaling cascade. Failure of induction of DNA damage responsive histone modifications may lead to genome instability and cancer. Here we will discuss our current understanding of the DNA damage responsive histone modifications and their role in DNA repair as well as their implications for genome stability. We further discuss recent studies which highlight not only how histone modification has involved in the signaling and remodeling at the DSB but also how it influences the DNA repair pathway choice. Conclusions: Histone modifications pattern alter during the induction of DNA DSBs induction as well as during the repair and recovery phase of DNA damage response. It will be interesting to understand more precisely, how DSBs within chromatin are repaired by HR and NHEJ. The emergence of proteomic and genomic technologies in combination with advanced microscopy and imaging methods will help in better understanding the role of chromatin environment in the regulation of genome stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]