51. Advanced-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Restaging System after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Basis of MR Imaging Determines Survival
- Author
-
Mu Sheng Zeng, Xue Wen Liu, Ming Yuan Chen, Hao Yuan Mo, Chuan Miao Xie, Xiang Guo, Chao Nan Qian, Chong Zhao, Jun Ma, Lin Quan Tang, Qiu Yan Chen, Ka Jia Cao, Ling Guo, Hai Qiang Mai, Ming Huang Hong, Li Ting Liu, Jin Xin Bei, Shan Shan Guo, Ying Sun, Jian Yong Shao, and Lu Zhang
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Nasopharyngeal neoplasm ,Docetaxel ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Stage (cooking) ,Survival rate ,Survival analysis ,Neoadjuvant therapy ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ,business.industry ,Carcinoma ,Hazard ratio ,Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Survival Rate ,Treatment Outcome ,030104 developmental biology ,Nasopharyngeal carcinoma ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Taxoids ,Fluorouracil ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,Cisplatin ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the prognostic value of the restaging system after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with advanced-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods This study was approved by the clinical research committee and a written informed consent was required before enrolling in the study. Prospectively enrolled were 412 consecutive patients with stage III-IVb NPC treated with NACT followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Patients were staged before NACT and restaged after NACT. The progression-free survival (PFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. Results Post-NACT T classification (PFS, P = .001) and N classification (PFS, P < .001; DMFS, P = .001) resulted in better survival curve separations than pre-NACT T classification and N classification. Patients downstaged from N2-N3 to N0-N1 disease had a better prognosis than did patients who continued to have N2-N3 diseases (3-year PFS, 83.8% vs 66.6%, P = .001; 3-year DMFS, 88.0% vs 78.4%, P = .026). Multivariate analysis revealed that post-NACT T classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18, 2.36; P = .003) and post-NACT N classification (HR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.03; P = .002) were independent prognostic factors for PFS; also, post-NACT N classification (HR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.07; P = .025) was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS. Multivariate analysis in patients with N2-N3 disease demonstrated that the N downstaging effects of NACT was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.81; P = .006) and DMFS (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28, 0.97; P = .039). Conclusion The post-NACT stage is more representative of prognosis than the pre-NACT stage in advanced-stage NPC patients, which suggests that major clinical decisions should be based on the post-NACT stage. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
- Published
- 2017