51. Compositional diversity and evolutionary pattern of coronavirus accessory proteins
- Author
-
Na Han, Hangyu Zhou, Yousong Peng, Liang Li, Taijiao Jiang, Ziyi Chen, Jingzhe Shang, Chengyang Ji, Aiping Wu, and Jing Meng
- Subjects
AcademicSubjects/SCI01060 ,compositional diversity ,Genes, Viral ,viruses ,coronavirus ,Computational biology ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,Open Reading Frames ,Viral Proteins ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Viral life cycle ,Transcription (biology) ,evolution ,medicine ,Humans ,Protein Interaction Maps ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Molecular Biology ,030304 developmental biology ,Coronavirus ,0303 health sciences ,Case Study ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 ,virus diseases ,Molecular Sequence Annotation ,Genome project ,Biological Evolution ,Open reading frame ,Regulatory sequence ,accessory proteins ,Host adaptation ,Information Systems - Abstract
Accessory proteins play important roles in the interaction between coronaviruses and their hosts. Accordingly, a comprehensive study of the compositional diversity and evolutionary patterns of accessory proteins is critical to understanding the host adaptation and epidemic variation of coronaviruses. Here, we developed a standardized genome annotation tool for coronavirus (CoroAnnoter) by combining open reading frame prediction, transcription regulatory sequence recognition and homologous alignment. Using CoroAnnoter, we annotated 39 representative coronavirus strains to form a compositional profile for all of the accessary proteins. Large variations were observed in the number of accessory proteins of 1–10 for different coronaviruses, with SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV having the most (9 and 10, respectively). The variation between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 accessory proteins could be traced back to related coronaviruses in other hosts. The genomic distribution of accessory proteins had significant intra-genus conservation and inter-genus diversity and could be grouped into 1, 4, 2 and 1 types for alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-coronaviruses, respectively. Evolutionary analysis suggested that accessory proteins are more conservative locating before the N-terminal of proteins E and M (E-M), while they are more diverse after these proteins. Furthermore, comparison of virus-host interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV accessory proteins showed that they share multiple antiviral signaling pathways, those involved in the apoptotic process, viral life cycle and response to oxidative stress. In summary, our study provides a tool for coronavirus genome annotation and builds a comprehensive profile for coronavirus accessory proteins covering their composition, classification, evolutionary pattern and host interaction.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF