51. Tumor location impact in stage II and III colon cancer: epidemiological and outcome evaluation
- Author
-
Hamouda Boussen, Nesrine Mejri, Nouha Daoud, Soumaya Labidi, Manel Dridi, and Houda El Benna
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Colorectal cancer ,Hazard ratio ,Gastroenterology ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Oncology ,Median follow-up ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Adjuvant therapy ,Adenocarcinoma ,Original Article ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Stage (cooking) ,business - Abstract
Background: We aimed to describe clinico-pathological characteristics and differences between rightsided (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) in Tunisian population. We also analyzed outcome to determine whether location is of prognostic significance. Methods: Clinico-pathological characteristics and Kaplan Meier survival were compared between two groups of LCC [150] and RCC [53] patients with stage II and III adenocarcinoma treated with curative intent between 2003–2014. Results: RCC patients were significantly more likely to be female, (56.6% vs . 39.3%, P=0.029) and to have undifferentiated tumor (87.1% vs . 8.4%, P=0.014), then LCC. After a median follow up of 49 months, 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in RCC vs . LCC [42% vs . 78%; hazard ratio (HR) =2.07; 95% CI: 1.05–4.09; P=0.03], no difference in relapse free survival (RFS) was observed. Median time to relapse was significantly shorter in RCC (15 months) vs . LCC (24 months), P=0.005. Tumor location significantly impacted survival in stage III, 5-year OS was 45% in RCC, and 63% in LCC, (HR =2.28; 95% CI: 1.01–5.24; P=0.04), there was no impact of tumor location in stage II, (HR =1.94; 95% CI: 0.54–6.93; P=0.29). Conclusions: Prognostic impact of tumor location should be considered as a stratification factor in the future clinical trials.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF