Search

Background and Objectives: The timely determination and evaluation of laboratory parameters in patients with acute life- or organ-threatening diseases and disease states in the emergency room or intensive care units can be essential for diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and outcome. The aim of the position paper is to define the time requirements for the provision of laboratory results in emergency and intensive care medicine. Requirements for point-of-care testing (POCT) and the (central) laboratory can be derived from the urgency., Methods: Expert groups from the DGKL (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin) and DIVI (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) developed a classification about the urgency for the determination of laboratory parameters as well as recommendations on the necessary organizational framework and quality assurance measures using national and international guidelines, review articles, and original papers., Results: Three levels of urgency are defined, based on the turnaround time of the most common laboratory parameters: emergency 1, with a turnaround time of no more than 15 min; emergency 2, with a turnaround time of a maximum of 60 min; urgent case, with a turnaround time within 4 h. In addition, a recommendation is made when to provide the results for the main ward rounds in the intensive care unit and the emergency department., Conclusions: The recommendations allow the organizational and technical regulations for each hospital to be aligned with the urgency of the provision of the test results to the medical team based on the medical requirements., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The medical development in the previous 15 years and the changes in treatment reality of the comprehensive elective treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms necessitate a re-evaluation of the quality assurance guidelines of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany (QBAA-RL). In the current version this requires a specialist further training quota for nursing personnel in intensive care wards of 50%. The quota was determined in 2008 based on expert opinions, although a direct empirical evidence base for this does not exist., Methods: Representatives from the fields of patient representation, physicians, nursing personnel and other relevant interface areas were invited to participate in a modified Delphi procedure. Following a comprehensive narrative literature search, a survey and focus group discussions with national and international experts, a total of three anonymized online-based voting rounds were carried out for which previously determined key statements were assessed with a 4‑point Likert scale (totally disagree up to totally agree). In addition, the expert panel had also defined a recommendation for a minimum quota for the specialist training of nursing personnel on intensive care wards in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, whereby an a priori agreement of 80% of the participants was defined as the consensus limit., Results: Overall, 37 experts participated in the discussions and three successive voting rounds (participation rate 89%). The panel confirmed the necessity of a re-evaluation of the guideline recommendations and recommended the introduction of a shift-related minimum quota of 30% of the full-time equivalent of nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the introduction of structured promotional programs for long-term elevation of the quota., Conclusion: In this national Delphi procedure with medical and nursing experts as well as representatives of patients, the fundamental benefits and needs of professional specialist qualifications in the field of intensive care medicine were confirmed. The corresponding minimum quota for specialist further training of intensive care nursing personnel should generally apply without limitations to specific groups. The expert panel stipulates a shift-related minimum quota for intensive care nursing personnel with specialist training of 30% of the nursing personnel on intensive care wards and the obligatory introduction of structured and transparent promotion programs for the long-term enhancement., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims and Methods: We evaluated an ultrasound score from 0 to 32 points in eight pulmonary regions to monitor critically ill COVID-19 patients. The score was correlated to surrogate parameters of disease severity, i.e., the oxygenation index, respiratory support, mortality, plasma interleukin-6, and WHO and ARDS classifications., Results: A total of 27 patients were repeatedly examined, and 71 examinations were evaluated. Patients with severe COVID-19 scored higher (median 17) than those with moderate disease (median 11, p < 0.01). The score did not differentiate between stages of ARDS as defined by the Berlin criteria ( p = 0.1) but could discern ARDS according to the revised ESICM definition ( p = 0.002). Non-survivors had higher ultrasound scores than survivors (median 18.5 vs. 14, p = 0.04). The score correlated to the oxygenation index (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.03), and changes in the score between examinations correlated to changes in oxygenation (ρ = -0.41, p = 0.16). The correlation between the score and interleukin-6 was ρ = 0.35 ( p < 0.001). The interrater reliability for the score was ICC = 0.87 ( p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The ultrasound score is a reliable tool that might help monitor disease severity and may help stratify the risk of mortality.

Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (≤250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km ± 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 ± 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km ± 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 ± 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 ± 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 ± 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 ± 18.1 days vs. 32.6 ± 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Background: Every year a large number of patients is suffering from influenza infection with often severe outcome. The influenza season 2017/2018 was characterized by a high number of cases (in Germany>346,000 laboratory-confirmed cases), but also by a high rate of hospitalizations with sometimes severe clinical outcome - also in the group of patients under 60 years., Aim: The aim of the present study was to find out whether patients not fullfilling the STIKO vaccination recommendation in the 2017/18 season were suffering from a worse outcome., Materials and Methods: All laboratory-confirmed influenza patients at Frankfurt University Hospital were retrospectively analyzed for disease severity with respect to the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were defined as demographic data, length of hospital stay, previous illnesses, intensive care therapy and its duration, drug therapy, and mortality., Results: Fifty-one of 303 patients (16.8%) required intensive care treatments. Of these 51, 46 patients (90.2%) belonged to the group that should have been vaccinated according to the vaccination recommendations according to STIKO, 5 patients (9.8%) did not belong to this group (p=0.434). Of the 51 ICU patients, 16 (31.4%) died. All deceased were from the group with vaccination recommendation (p=0.120)., Conclusions: Based on these data, it appears that severe disease progression occurs in both the group of patients with and without STIKO vaccination recommendation, but deaths occur only in the group of patients with recommendation., Competing Interests: PD Dr. Haitham Mutlak erhielt Vortragshonorare der Firma Getinge.Prof. Dr. Sabine Wicker begleitet das Amt der stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden der STIKO. Prof. Dr. Dr. Zacharowski erhielt Beraterhonorare von Haemonetics und Vifor sowie Vortragshonorare von CSL Behring und GE Healthcare. Er ist der Studienleiter des EU-Horizon 2020 Projekts ENVISION und des Horizon Europe 2021 Projekts COVend. Alle weiteren Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenskonflikt vorliegt., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Study Objective: We explored the feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to guide evidence-based perioperative anticoagulation., Design: Prospective randomised clinical management simulation multicentre study., Setting: Five University and 11 general hospitals in Germany., Participants: We enrolled physicians (anaesthesiologist (n = 73), trauma surgeons (n = 2), unknown (n = 1)) with different professional experience., Interventions: A CDSS based on a multiple-choice test was developed and validated at the University Hospital of Frankfurt (phase-I). The CDSS comprised European guidelines for the management of anticoagulation in cardiology, cardio-thoracic, non-cardio-thoracic surgery and anaesthesiology. Phase-II compared the efficiency of physicians in identifying evidence-based approach of managing perioperative anticoagulation. In total 168 physicians were randomised to CDSS (PERI-KOAG) or CONTROL., Measurements: Overall mean score and association of processing time and professional experience were analysed. The multiple-choice test consists of 11 cases and two correct answers per question were required to gain 100% success rate (=22 points)., Main Results: In total 76 physicians completed the questionnaire (n = 42 PERI-KOAG; n = 34 CONTROL; attrition rate 54%). Overall mean score (max. 100% = 22 points) was significantly higher in PERI-KOAG compared to CONTROL (82 ± 15% vs. 70 ± 10%; 18 ± 3 vs. 15 ± 2 points; P = 0.0003). A longer processing time is associated with significantly increased overall mean scores in PERI-KOAG (≥33 min. 89 ± 10% (20 ± 2 points) vs. <33 min. 73 ± 15% (16 ± 3 points), P = 0.0005) but not in CONTROL (≥33 min. 74 ± 13% (16 ± 3 points) vs. <33 min. 69 ± 9% (15 ± 2 points), P = 0.11). Within PERI-KOAG, there is a tendency towards higher results within the more experienced group (>5 years), but no significant difference to less (≤5 years) experienced colleagues (87 ± 10% (19 ± 2 points) vs. 78 ± 17% (17 ± 4 points), P = 0.08). However, an association between professional experience and success rate in CONTROL has not been shown (71 ± 8% vs. 70 ± 13%, 16 ± 2 vs. 15 ± 3 points; P = 0.66)., Conclusions: CDSS significantly improved the identification of evidence-based treatment approaches. A precise usage of CDSS is mandatory to maximise efficiency., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many retrospective single-centre or specialised centre reports have shown promising mortality rates with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. However, the mortality rate of an entire country throughout the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown., Objectives: The primary objective is to determine the hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) and veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) therapy. Secondary objectives are the chronological development of mortality during the pandemic, the analysis of comorbidities, age and complications., Design: Cohort study., Setting: Inpatient data from January 2020 to September 2021 of all hospitals in Germany were analysed., Participants: All COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed according to the appropriate international statistical classification of diseases and related health problem codes (ICDs) and process key codes (OPSs)., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the hospital mortality., Results: In total, 4279 COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed. Among 404 patients treated with VA-ECMO and 3875 treated with VV-ECMO, the hospital mortality was high: 72% (n = 291) for VA-ECMO and 65.9% (n = 2552) for VV-ECMO. A total of 43.2% (n = 1848) of all patients were older than 60 years with a hospital mortality rate of 72.7% (n = 172) for VA-ECMO and 77.6% (n = 1301) for VV-ECMO. CPR was performed in 44.1% (n = 178) of patients with VA-ECMO and 16.4% (n = 637) of patients with VV-ECMO. The mortality rates widely varied from 48.1 to 84.4% in individual months and worsened from March 2020 (59.2%) to September 2021 (78.4%)., Conclusion: In Germany, a large proportion of elderly patients with COVID-19 were treated with ECMO, with an unacceptably high hospital mortality. Considering these data, the unconditional use of ECMO therapy in COVID-19 must be carefully considered and advanced age should be considered as a relative contraindication., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.)

Background: Acquired platelet dysfunction is a common element of trauma-induced coagulopathy and has been linked to increased mortality. The aim of the study was to describe the prevalence of platelet dysfunction in patients with acute intracranial bleeding., Methods: Patients diagnosed with acute intracranial bleeding were screened for eligibility. Patients with an urgent need for craniotomy were enrolled in this prospective monocentric study. Platelet function analyses using multiple electrode aggregometry (TRAPtest, ASPItest and ADPtest) and conventional coagulation tests were performed. The area under the aggregation curves of the ASPItest and ADPtest were defined as primary outcome variables., Results: Seventy-seven patients were screened for eligibility, and 49 patients were ultimately enrolled in the study. In 14 patients (29%), clinically relevant platelet dysfunction was observed. Of those, 8 patients were treated with antiaggregatory medication at the time of study inclusion. Six patients (12%) were diagnosed with acute acquired platelet dysfunction., Conclusions: Decreased platelet function was present in nearly one-third of patients with acute intracranial bleeding. Hemotherapy algorithms for the treatment of coagulopathy in this cohort should incorporate aggregometric measures to enable rapid goal-directed therapy.

This correspondence argues that data presented previously cannot justify a novel approach for treating hypoxic patients with severe #COVID19 https://bit.ly/3dLaPlk., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Supady reports a research grant from CytoSorbents to his institution, and lecture fees from CytoSorbents and Abiomed, not related to this work. Conflict of interest: P.M. Lepper has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Bracht has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: O. Moerer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.M. Muellenbach has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Michels has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.O. Fiedler reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from GE and Löwenstein; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Löwenstein. Conflict of interest: A. Kalenka has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Kochanek has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Mutlak has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Danziger has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Muenz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Lunz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Hoersch has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Staudacher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Wengenmayer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Zotzmann has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Background: Anticoagulatory activity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is not routinely measurable by point-of-care monitoring. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of dabigatran/rivaroxaban on point-of-care testing., Methods: Samples from 34 participants under DOAC therapy were drawn at two time points. Before ingestion and two-to-three hours afterwards. Thrombelastometric (ROTEM) and aggregometric (Multiplate) measurements were performed. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban plasma levels were determined., Results: Dabigatran and rivaroxaban plasma levels showed significant correlations with clotting time (CT) in EXTEM (r=0.765, P<0.0001; r=0.689, P<0.0001) and INTEM (r=0.792, P<0.0001; r=0.595, P<0.001). A positive correlation was identified between dabigatran ingestion and maximum-clot-firmness (MCF) (r=0.354, P<0.05) in the EXTEM test, pronounced in the absence of concomitant antiplatelet therapy (r=0.709, P<0.05). EXTEM-MCF positively correlated with the TRAP test in aggregometry (0.662, P<0.05), an effect not observed in patients treated with antiplatelet therapy., Conclusions: Prolongation of CT-EXTEM and CT-INTEM indicates delayed initiation of clot formation. The CT-EXTEM seems to facilitate qualitative monitoring of dabigatran. In contrast, qualitative monitoring of rivaroxaban by CT-EXTEM may be limited as rivaroxaban may affect the measurement at therapeutic plasma levels. It seems that clot formation is faster/firmer in the presence of increased dabigatran plasma levels. This can be attributed to a non-dose-dependent effect via increased fibrin polymerization and second to a dose-dependent effect via increased platelet sensitivity to thrombin.

Background: Changes in pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion were proposed as hallmarks of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) may overcome these issues and improve arterial oxygenation., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed arterial oxygenation and pulmonary vasoreactivity in seven COVID-19 ARDS patients receiving 20 ppm iNO for 15-30 minutes., Results: The inhalation of NO significantly improved oxygenation. All patients with severe ARDS had higher partial pressures of oxygen and reduced pulmonary vascular resistance. Significant changes in pulmonary shunting were not observed., Conclusion: Overall, iNO could provide immediate help and delay respiratory deterioration in COVID-19-induced moderate to severe ARDS., (© 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) often leads to poor outcome. The aim of the study was to assess platelet function in patients after SAH., Methods: In this prospective observational study in patients suffering from SAH, platelet count and aggregability were assessed by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) over 14 days., Results: In 12 of 18 patients, cerebral vasospasms (CVS) were diagnosed; of those, five developed delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). We observed a significant increase in the platelet count compared to baseline from day 8 onwards (p < 0.037) and, in patients with CVS and DCI, a significant difference in outcome classified by the mRS (p = 0.047). Repeated measures ANOVA determined no differences in platelet aggregability in patients with or without CVS/DCI., Conclusions: Besides an increase in platelet count, we detected no increase in platelet aggregability. Nevertheless, patients after SAH may have increased platelet aggregability, which is not reflected by MEA.

Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has become an integral part of modern intensive therapy. The choice of support mode depends largely on the indication. Patients with respiratory failure are predominantly treated with a venovenous (VV) approach. We hypothesized that mortality in Germany in ECLS therapy did not differ from previously reported literature METHODS: Inpatient data from Germany from 2007 to 2018 provided by the Federal Statistical Office of Germany were analysed. The international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems codes (ICD) and process keys (OPS) for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) types, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and hospital mortality were used., Results: In total, 45,647 hospitalized patients treated with ECLS were analysed. In Germany, 231 hospitals provided ECLS therapy, with a median of 4 VV-ECMO and 9 VA-ECMO in 2018. Overall hospital mortality remained higher than predicted in comparison to the values reported in the literature. The number of VV-ECMO cases increased by 236% from 825 in 2007 to 2768 in 2018. ARDS was the main indication for VV-ECMO in only 33% of the patients in the past, but that proportion increased to 60% in 2018. VA-ECMO support is of minor importance in the treatment of ARDS in Germany. The age distribution of patients undergoing ECLS has shifted towards an older population. In 2018, the hospital mortality decreased in VV-ECMO patients and VV-ECMO patients with ARDS to 53.9% (n = 1493) and 54.4% (n = 926), respectively., Conclusions: ARDS is a severe disease with a high mortality rate despite ECLS therapy. Although endpoints and timing of the evaluations differed from those of the CESAR and EOLIA studies and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry, the reported mortality in these studies was lower than in the present analysis. Further prospective analyses are necessary to evaluate outcomes in ECMO therapy at the centre volume level.

Objectives: Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) is a major health problem in patients with liver cirrhosis. The impact of MDRO colonization in liver transplantation (LT) candidates and recipients on mortality has not been determined in detail., Methods: Patients consecutively evaluated and listed for LT in a tertiary German liver transplant center from 2008 to 2018 underwent screening for MDRO colonization including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). MDRO colonization and infection status were obtained at LT evaluation, planned and unplanned hospitalization, three months upon graft allocation, or at last follow-up on the waiting list., Results: In total, 351 patients were listed for LT, of whom 164 (47%) underwent LT after a median of 249 (range 0-1662) days. Incidence of MDRO colonization increased during waiting time for LT, and MRDO colonization was associated with increased mortality on the waiting list (HR = 2.57, p<0.0001. One patients was colonized with a carbapenem-resistant strain at listing, 9 patients acquired carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) on the waiting list, and 4 more after LT. In total, 10 of these 14 patients died., Conclusions: Colonization with MDRO is associated with increased mortality on the waiting list, but not in short-term follow-up after LT. Moreover, colonization with CRGN seems associated with high mortality in liver transplant candidates and recipients., Competing Interests: Philip G. Ferstl, Consultancies: SNIPR Biome. Wolf O. Bechstein: Consultancies/speaker fees: Astellas, Chiesi, Gore Deutschland, Medupdate GmbH, MCI, MCN, Novartis. Michael Hogardt, Grants: Gilead, Kirmser Foundation, German CF Foundation; Speaker’s fees: Thieme Science, Chiesi GmbH. Haitham Mutlak, Speaker’s fees: Orion Pharma, Löwenstein Medical, Pfizer, Getinge. Christoph Stephan, Speaker’s fees: AbbVie, LÄK-Hessen, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, TAD, ViiV; Consultancies: AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV. Nina Weiler, Consultancy: Astellas and Novartis, Travel support: AbbVie, Astellas, Biotest, and Novartis. Jonel Trebicka, Speaker’s fees and/or consultancies: Gore, Bayer, Alexion, MSD, Gilead, Intercept, Norgine, Grifols, Versantis, and Martin Pharmaceutical. Stefan Zeuzem: Speaker’s fees: Abbvie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Consultancy: Abbvie, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen. Oliver Waidmann, Consultancies: Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Incyte, Ipsen, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Servier, Shire; Speaker’s fees: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Novartis, Roche, Shire; Travel support: Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Ipsen, Merck; Grants: Basilea, Incyte, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Medac, Merck Serono, MSD. Martin-Walter Welker, Consultancies / speaker’s fees: AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, Chiesis, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Roche; Travel Support: AbbVie, Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Roche. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay. Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients., Competing Interests: PHeu reports grants from German Ministry of Research and Education, German Research Foundation, European Union, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Chamber of Physicians, German Parkinson Society, University Hospital Würzburg, Robert Koch Institute, German Heart Foundation, Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) within the Innovationfond, University Hospital Heidelberg (within RASUNOA-prime; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the University Hospital Heidelberg from Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo), Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin (within Mondafis; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the Charité from Bayer), University Göttingen (within FIND-AF randomized; supported by an unrestricted research grant to the University Göttingen from Boehringer-Ingelheim), outside the submitted work. SF reports grants from DFG, BMBF, grants and personal fees from Abiomed, Amgen, Akzea, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie, Braun, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Siemens, Zoll, outside the submitted work. GE reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Vifor Pharma Deutschland GmbH, outside the submitted work; PK reports other from FreseniusKabi, personal fees from BBraun, grants, personal fees and other from TEVARatiopharm, other from CSL Behring, other from Pajunk, other from APEPTICO Forschung und Entwicklung GmbH, outside the submitted work; KZ reports personal fees from Aesculap Akademie GmbH, personal fees from Affinites Sante, grants from Ashai Kasai Pharma, grants and personal fees from B. Braun AG, grants and personal fees from B. Braun Avitum AG, personal fees from Bayer AG, grants from Biotest AG, personal fees from Christian Doppler Stiftung, grants and personal fees from CSL Behring GmbH, personal fees from Cyto Sorbents GmbH, personal fees from Edward Lifescience Corporation, personal fees from Executive Insight AG, personal fees from Fresenius Kabi GmbH, personal fees from Fresenius Medical Care, personal fees from Haemonetics Corporation, personal fees from Hartmannbund Landesverband, personal fees from Health Adcances GmbH, personal fees from Heinen + Löwenstein GmbH, personal fees from Hexal AG, grants from INC Research, personal fees from Johnson and Johnson, personal fees from Josef Gassner, personal fees from Maquet GmbH, personal fees from Markus Lücke Kongress Organization, personal fees from Masimo International, personal fees from med Update GmbH, personal fees from Medizin and Markt Gesundheitswerk, personal fees from MSD Sharp and Dohme GmbH, personal fees from Nordic Group, personal fees from Nordic Pharma, grants from Novo Nordisc Pharma GmbH, grants from Pfizer Pharma GmbH, personal fees from Pharmacosmos, personal fees from Ratiopharm GmbH, personal fees from Salvia Medical GmbH, personal fees from Schering Stiftung, personal fees from Schöchl Medical Österreich, personal fees from Serumwerke, personal fees from Verlag für Printmedien und PR, Forum Sanitas, grants and personal fees from Vifor Pharma GmbH, personal fees from Wellington, personal fees from Werfen, outside the submitted work; HK served as a speaker and/or an Advisory Board Member for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, ViiV and has received research funding from AbbVie, Arrowhaed, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, German Liver Foundation, Hector Foundation, Virtual University of Bavaria, Federal Ministry of Education and Research, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Herrmann, Adam, Notz, Helmer, Sonntagbauer, Ungemach-Papenberg, Sanns, Zausig, Steinfeldt, Torje, Schmid, Schlesinger, Rolfes, Reyher, Kredel, Stumpner, Brack, Wurmb, Gill-Schuster, Kranke, Weismann, Klinker, Heuschmann, Rücker, Frantz, Ertl, Muellenbach, Mutlak, Meybohm, Zacharowski and Lotz.)

Study Objective: Video laryngoscopy has primarily been developed to assist in difficult airways. Using video laryngoscopy in pediatric airway management is an up-and-coming topic. The aim of the presented study was to compare the intubation conditions obtained when using the C-MAC video laryngoscope with Miller blades sizes 0 and 1 for standard direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy in children weighing less than 10 kg., Design: This was a prospective study., Setting: The study was performed in a university hospital., Patients: Following ethical approval, 86 infants weighing less than 10 kg and undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were studied prospectively., Intervention: Indirect and direct laryngoscopy either with C-MAC Miller blade size 0 or size 1., Measurements: First, direct laryngoscopy was performed, and the best obtained view was graded without looking at the video monitor. A second investigator blinded to the view obtained under direct laryngoscopy graded the laryngeal view on the video monitor. Time to intubation, intubation conditions, and intubation attempts were recorded., Results: In infants less than 10 kg, intubation conditions were excellent. There were no significant differences between the use of Miller blade 0 or 1 in reference to Cormack-Lehane grade, time to intubation, time to best view, or intubation attempts. Comparing direct and indirect intubation conditions using either Miller blade 0 or 1 revealed that the use of indirect laryngoscopy provided a significantly better view (P < 0.05) of the vocal cords. In 3 infants weighing more than 8 kg, the Miller blade 0 was described as too short and narrow for intubation., Conclusions: Both devices allowed for an excellent visualization of the vocal cords.

Background: Endotracheal (ET) intubation has been the gold standard in out-of-hospital airway management for a long time. Recent guidelines suggest an alternative airway management with supraglottic airway devices like the laryngeal tube (LT) especially for less experienced rescue personnel. However, scientific evidence on the prognostic impact of the laryngeal tube in the setting of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is limited., Methods: We aimed to compare mortality outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients after preclinically initiated airway management with either ET or LT in a propensity score matched, single-center retrospective analysis., Results: A total of 208 patients with OHCA were resuscitated and intubated with either ET (n = 160; 77%) or LT (n = 48; 23%) in the urban area of Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and treated thereafter on the intensive care unit of the University Hospital Frankfurt from 2006-2014. In-hospital mortality was 84% versus 85% in the ET and LT group (p = 0.86). No difference regarding in-hospital mortality has been observed between the two airway management techniques in univariate as well as in multivariate mortality analysis (HR = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.39; p = 0.92; adjusted HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.76-1.56; p = 0.62). To adjust for potential confounders, propensity score matching was additionally performed resulting in a cohort of 120 matched patients in a 3:1 ratio (ET:LT). Again, survival to hospital discharge was comparable between the two patient groups (propensity-adjusted HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.65-1.51, p = 0.97). Further, preclinical airway management with LT or ET showed no difference in mortality within first 24 h (propensity-adjusted HR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.44-2.36; p = 0.96)., Conclusion: Preclinical airway management with LT shows similar mortality outcomes in direct comparison to intubation with ET in OHCA patients. Further randomized studies are warranted.

Background: Besides public awareness and specialist knowledge and training of physicians, their self-confidence plays a key role for clinical decision-making in the respective area., Objective: This exploratory study investigated the influence of the discipline on differences in self-confidence in dealing with antibiotics and in the self-rated knowledge., Methods: In 2015 the multi-institutional reconnaissance of practice with multiresistant bacteria (MR2) questionnaire containing items on antibiotic prescription and multiresistant pathogens was sent out to 1061 physicians working in departments for internal medicine, general surgery, gynecology and obstetrics and urology. In 2017 a similar MR2 survey was sent to 1268 specialist and assistant physicians in anesthesiology in Germany. Besides demographic data 4 items on self-confidence in the use of antibiotic treatment and 11 items concerning self-rated knowledge about rational antibiotic therapy and multiresistant pathogens were included in the present analysis. Logistic regression analysis, the χ 2 -test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis of the influence of the discipline on these items., Results: The response rates were 43% (456 out of 1061) from the non-anesthetists and 56% (705 out of 1268) from the anesthetists. Of the non-anesthetists 44% and 57% of the anesthetists had had no advanced training on antibiotic stewardship during the year before the study. In the overall analysis anesthetists (mean±SD: 2.53±0.54) were significantly less self-confident about antibiotics than colleagues from other departments (internal medicine: 3.10±0.50, general surgery: 2.97±0.44, gynecology and obstetrics: 3.12±0.42 and urology: 3.15±0.44) in the unadjusted (all p<0.001) and adjusted comparison. The analysis of self-rated knowledge about rational antibiotic prescription showed similar results. Senior consultant status and advanced training in infectiology were significantly associated with self-confidence and self-rated knowledge about antibiotics., Conclusion: Anesthetists showed significantly less self-confidence in dealing with antibiotics than colleagues from other disciplines. Advanced training on a rational prescription of antibiotics was associated with a greater self-confidence, so that the implementation of compulsory courses on rational antibiotic stewardship in the respective residency curriculum needs to be considered.

Extracorporeal lung support is increasingly implemented worldwide in clinical practice in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is required when mechanical ventilation is unable to establish sufficient pulmonary gas exchange or if the respirator settings are persistent elevated with an increased risk for ventilator induced lung injury (VILI). Besides that, hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) or acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) is common and may require extracorporeal elimination of carbon dioxide by ECCO 2 R, which also has been increasingly used in the clinical setting. For both therapeutic regimes there is up to date no clear evidence for a significant reduction in mortality in patients with ARDS. Therefore extracorporeal lung support should be still considered as a rescue therapy. In this review, based on a selective literature research and clinical experience of the authors, management of patients with extracorporeal lung assist, focusing on ECMO and ECCO 2 R is summarized., Competing Interests: Erklärung zu finanziellen Interessen Forschungsförderung erhalten: nein; Honorar/geldwerten Vorteil für Referententätigkeit erhalten: ja, von einer anderen Institution (Pharma- oder Medizintechnikfirma usw.); Bezahlter Berater/interner Schulungsreferent/Gehaltsempfänger: nein; Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an im Bereich der Medizin aktiven Firma: nein; Patent/Geschäftsanteile/Aktien (Autor/Partner, Ehepartner, Kinder) an zu Sponsoren dieser Fortbildung bzw. durch die Fortbildung in ihren Geschäftsinteressen berührten Firma: nein. Erklärung zu nichtfinanziellen Interessen Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The i-gel mask is a second-generation, single-use supraglottic airway device which does not have an inflatable cuff. The cuff consists of a thermoplastic elastomer and its mechanism of sealing still remains unclear. Various theories such as temperature-dependent changes in hardness and volume expansion as well as fluid absorption have been discussed. The aim of the present study is to investigate changes in volume, weight and density caused by temperature changes., Material and Methods: Three i-gel masks (sizes 3, 4 and 5) were heated in a water bath from 10°C to 50°C in 5°C steps. The changes in weight, volume, and density were measured at each temperature step. In a second study, the identical parameters of masks (n = 5 of sizes 3, 4 and 5) used in patients were investigated. Results of volume and density between benchtop and patient measurements were examined for correlation., Results: All masks investigated, regardless of the size, showed a significant linear temperature-dependent volume expansion (sizes 3, 4 and 5: P < 0.001), a weight increase (sizes 3: P = 0.018; 4: P = 0.027; and 5: P = 0.006) and a linear decrease in density (sizes 3, 4 and 5: P < 0.001). There was a very strong correlation between the results of benchtop and patient measurements (volume: P < 0.001; density: P < 0.001)., Conclusions: We observed significant changes in all three properties investigated. Thus, a temperature-dependent volume expansion and weight increasement was observed, which can be considered as a further explanation for improved sealing after insertion.

Background: Tracheal intubation still represents the "gold standard" in securing the airway of unconscious patients in the prehospital setting. Especially in cases of restricted access to the patient, video laryngoscopy became more and more relevant., Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance and intubation success of four different video laryngoscopes, one optical laryngoscope, and a Macintosh blade while intubating from two different positions in a mannequin trial with difficult access to the patient., Methods: A mannequin with a cervical collar was placed on the driver's seat. Intubation was performed with six different laryngoscopes either through the driver's window or from the backseat. Success, C/L score, time to best view (TTBV), time to intubation (TTI), and number of attempts were measured. All participants were asked to rate their favored device., Results: Forty-two physicians participated. 100% of all intubations performed from the backseat were successful. Intubation success through the driver's window was less successful. Only with the Airtraq® optical laryngoscope, 100% success was achieved. Best visualization (window C/L 2a; backseat C/L 2a) and shortest TTBV (window 4.7 s; backseat 4.1 s) were obtained when using the D-Blade video laryngoscope, but this was not associated with a higher success through the driver's window. Fastest TTI was achieved through the window (14.2 s) when using the C-MAC video laryngoscope and from the backseat (7.3 s) when using a Macintosh blade., Conclusions: Video laryngoscopy revealed better results in visualization but was not associated with a higher success. Success depended on the approach and familiarity with the device. We believe that video laryngoscopy is suitable for securing airways in trapped accident victims. The decision for an optimal device is complicated and should be based upon experience and regular training with the device., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Florian J. Raimann et al.)

Background: High rates of multiresistant pathogens require detailed knowledge about rational utilization of antibiotics. Many physicians consider themselves uncertain about the interpretation of microbiological diagnostics. We examined whether self-confidence, self-rated knowledge, and objective knowledge regarding the use of antibiotics are associated with gender., Methods: For this survey study, in 2017, anaesthesiologists and residents of 16 anaesthetic departments in Germany were asked to complete the Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with Multiresistant bacteria (MR2) survey. It consists of 55 items evaluating self-confidence regarding the practical use of antibiotics (n = 6), self-rated theoretical knowledge (n = 16), and objective knowledge (n = 5). Their answers to these items in relation to their gender were analysed using Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis-H-Tests, and unadjusted as well as adjusted logistic regression models., Results: Six hundred eighty-four (response rate: 53.9 %) questionnaires were returned and were available for analysis. Female doctors (35.5 %) felt less self-confident (P < 0.001). Self-rated knowledge differed in overall mean (P = 0.014) and the unadjusted (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; P = 0.013) but not in the adjusted logistic regression (OR: 0.84; P = 0.525). Objective knowledge differed after pooling questions (61.2% correct answers vs 65.4%, P = 0.01) but not with respect to single items and the adjusted logistic regression (OR: 0.83, P = 0.356)., Conclusion: Less self-confidence and a lower self-rated knowledge were found in female anaesthetists; this is consistent to the gender phenomena observed by other researchers. Nevertheless, between the 2 groups objective knowledge did not differ significantly in any item., (© 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Refugees have a significant risk of carrying multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO), including multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms (MDRGN) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Since the duration of MDRGN colonization has been shown to last for several months, we hypothesize that the prevalence of MDRO in refugees gradually declines during their stay in Germany to the level of MDRO prevalence in non-refugee patients. Knowledge about the dynamics of refugees' MDRO prevalence might provide the basis for appropriate infection control measures for refugees in hospitals as well as refugees' MDRO epidemiology in general. Material and methods: MDRO prevalence in 109 refugees admitted to the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, were compared to 819 adult controls and 224 pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit between June 2016 and May 2017. Results: 41.3% (95% confidence interval=31.9-51.1) of the refugees, 5.7% (4.2-7.6) of the adult controls and 8.9% (5.5-13.5) of the pediatric controls were positive for at least one MDRGN. The highest MDRGN prevalence was found in refugees who recently arrived (≤3 months) in Germany (72.4%; 52.8-87.3). Refugees' MDRGN prevalence declined continuously over time, reaching the adult and pediatric controls' MDRGN prevalence 18 months at the earliest after their arrival in Germany, i.e., 14.9% (1.8-42.8). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that refugees' MDRGN prevalence is declining over time since their arrival in Germany. 18 months after their arrival, refugees' and locals' MDRGN prevalence no longer differs significantly, although the refugees' MDRGN prevalence is still higher. A decline of MRSA prevalence was found 18 months after refugees' arrival. However, MRSA prevalence was still 14%, and thus 8 times higher than that of controls, indicating that precautionary measures continue to be necessary to prevent MRSA transmission., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Objective . Evaluation of C-MAC PM® in combination with a standard Macintosh blade size 3 in direct and indirect laryngoscopy and D-Blade® in indirect laryngoscopy in a simulated difficult airway. Primary outcome was defined as the best view of the glottic structures. Secondary endpoints were subjective evaluation and assessment of the intubation process. Methods . Prospective monocentric, observational study on 48 adult patients without predictors for difficult laryngoscopy/tracheal intubation undergoing orthopedic surgery. Every participant preoperatively received a cervical collar to simulate a difficult airway. Direct and indirect laryngoscopy w/o the BURP maneuver with a standard Macintosh blade and indirect laryngoscopy w/o the BURP maneuver using D-Blade® were performed to evaluate if blade geometry and the BURP maneuver improve the glottic view as measured by the Cormack-Lehane score. Results . Using a C-MAC PM® laryngoscope, D-Blade® yielded improved glottic views compared with the Macintosh blade used with either the direct or indirect technique. Changing from direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade to indirect videolaryngoscopy using C-MAC PM® with D-Blade® improved the Cormack-Lehane score from IIb, III, or IV to I or II in 31 cases. Conclusion . The combination of C-MAC PM® and D-Blade® significantly enhances the view of the glottis compared to direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Trial Registration Number . This trial is registered under number NCT03403946.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Lung-protective strategies are the cornerstone of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with both ARDS and other disorders. Extracorporeal CO 2 removal (ECCO 2 R) may enhance lung protection by allowing even further reductions in tidal volumes and is effective in low-flow settings commonly used for renal replacement therapy. In this study, we describe for the first time the effects of a labeled and certified system combining ECCO 2 R and renal replacement therapy on pulmonary stress and strain in hypercapnic patients with renal failure., Methods: Twenty patients were treated with the combined system which incorporates a membrane lung (0.32 m 2 ) in a conventional renal replacement circuit. After changes in blood gases under ECCO 2 R were recorded, baseline hypercapnia was reestablished and the impact on ventilation parameters such as tidal volume and driving pressure was recorded., Results: The system delivered ECCO 2 R at rate of 43.4 ± 14.1 ml/min, PaCO 2 decreased from 68.3 ± 11.8 to 61.8 ± 11.5 mmHg (p < 0.05) and pH increased from 7.18 ± 0.09 to 7.22 ± 0.08 (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in ventilation requirements with a decrease in tidal volume from 6.2 ± 0.9 to 5.4 ± 1.1 ml/kg PBW (p < 0.05) corresponding to a decrease in plateau pressure from 30.6 ± 4.6 to 27.7 ± 4.1 cmH 2 O (p < 0.05) and a decrease in driving pressure from 18.3 ± 4.3 to 15.6 ± 3.9 cmH 2 O (p < 0.05), indicating reduced pulmonary stress and strain. No complications related to the procedure were observed., Conclusions: The investigated low-flow ECCO 2 R and renal replacement system can ameliorate respiratory acidosis and decrease ventilation requirements in hypercapnic patients with concomitant renal failure. Trial registration NCT02590575, registered 10/23/2015.

OBJECTIVE To date, treatment of complex unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains challenging. Therefore, advanced techniques are required to achieve an optimal result in treating these patients safely. In this study, the safety and efficacy of rapid ventricular pacing (RVP) to facilitate microsurgical clip reconstruction was investigated prospectively in a joined neurosurgery, anesthesiology, and cardiology study. METHODS Patients with complex UIAs were prospectively enrolled. Both the safety and efficacy of RVP were evaluated by recording cardiovascular events and outcomes of patients as well as the amount of aneurysm occlusion after the surgical clip reconstruction procedure. A questionnaire was used to evaluate aneurysm preparation and clip application under RVP. RESULTS Twenty patients (mean age 51.6 years, range 28-66 years) were included in this study. Electrode positioning was easy in 19 (95%) of 20 patients, and removal of electrodes was easily accomplished in all patients (100%). No complications associated with the placement of the pacing electrodes occurred, such as cardiac perforation or cardiac tamponade. RVP was applied in 16 patients. The mean aneurysm size was 11.1 ± 5.5 mm (range 6-30 mm). RVP proved to be a very helpful tool in aneurysm preparation and clip application in 15 (94%) of 16 patients. RVP was used for a mean duration of 60 ± 25 seconds, a mean heart rate of 173 ± 23 bpm (range 150-210 bpm), and a reduction of mean arterial pressure to 35-55 mm Hg. RVP leads to softening of the aneurysm sac facilitating its mobilization, clip application, and closure of the clip blades. In 2 patients, cardiac events were documented that resolved without permanent sequelae in both. In every patient with successful RVP (n = 14) a total or near-total aneurysm occlusion was documented. In the 1 patient in whom the second RVP failed due to pacemaker electrode dislocation, additional temporary clipping was required to secure the aneurysm, but was not as sufficient as RVP. This led to an incomplete clipping of the aneurysm and finally a remnant on postoperative digital subtraction angiography. A pacemaker lead dislocation occurred in 3 (19%) of 16 patients, but intraoperative repositioning requires less than 20 seconds. Outcome was favorable in all patients according to the modified Rankin Scale. CONCLUSIONS To the best of the authors' knowledge this is the first prospective interdisciplinary study of RVP use in patients with UIAs. RVP is an elegant technique that facilitates clip reconstruction in complex UIAs. The safety of the procedure is good. However, because this procedure requires extensive preoperative cardiological workup of the patient and an experienced neurosurgery and neuroanesthesiology team with much cerebrovascular expertise, actually it remains reserved for selected elective cases and highly specialized centers. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02766972 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Background: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been suggested to protect against certain forms of organ injury after cardiac surgery. Previously, we reported the main results of RIPHeart (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery) Study, a multicenter trial randomizing 1403 cardiac surgery patients receiving either RIPC or sham-RIPC., Methods and Results: In this follow-up paper, we present 1-year follow-up of the composite primary end point and its individual components (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and acute renal failure), in a sub-group of patients, intraoperative myocardial dysfunction assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and the incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days and 3 months after surgery. RIPC neither showed any beneficial effect on the 1-year composite primary end point (RIPC versus sham-RIPC 16.4% versus 16.9%) and its individual components (all-cause mortality [3.4% versus 2.5%], myocardial infarction [7.0% versus 9.4%], stroke [2.2% versus 3.1%], acute renal failure [7.0% versus 5.7%]) nor improved intraoperative myocardial dysfunction or incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction 5 to 7 days (67 [47.5%] versus 71 [53.8%] patients) and 3 months after surgery (17 [27.9%] versus 18 [27.7%] patients), respectively., Conclusions: Similar to our main study, RIPC had no effect on intraoperative myocardial dysfunction, neurocognitive function and long-term outcome in cardiac surgery patients undergoing propofol anesthesia., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01067703., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Objective:: The role of supraglottic airway devices in emergency airway management is highlighted in international airway management guidelines. We evaluated the application of the new generation laryngeal tube suction (LTS-II/LTS-D) in the management of in-hospital unexpected difficult airway and cardiopulmonary resuscitation., Methods:: During a seven-year period, patients treated with a laryngeal tube who received routine anesthesia and had an unexpected difficult airway (Cormack Lehane Grade 3-4), who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation outside the operating room and had a difficult airway were evaluated. Successful placement of the LTS II/LTS-D, sufficient ventilation, time to placement, number of placement attempts, stomach content, peripheral oxygen saturation/end-tidal carbon dioxide development (SpO2/etCO2) over 5 minutes, subjective overall assessment and complications were recorded., Results:: In total, 106 adult patients were treated using an LTS-II/LTS-D. The main indication for placement was a difficult airway (75%, n=80), followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (25%, n=26) or an overlap between both (18%, n=19). In 94% of patients (n=100), users placed the laryngeal tube during the first attempt. In 93% of patients (n=98), the tube was placed within 30 seconds. A significant increase in SpO2 from 97% (0-100) to 99% (5-100) was observed in the whole population and in cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients. The average initial etCO2 of 39.5 mmHg (0-100 mmHg) decreased significantly to an average of 38.4 mmHg (10-62 mmHg) after 5 minutes. A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients with non-cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients regarding gastric contents showed no significant difference., Conclusions:: LTS-D/LTS-II use for in-hospital unexpected difficult airway management provides a secure method for primary airway management until other options such as video laryngoscopy or fiber optic intubation become available.

Preoperative identification of patients with an increased risk for perioperative pulmonary complications is crucial for the anesthesiological management. These complications were underestimated in the past, but are associated with an increased morbidity and mortality when occuring. Patients with preexisting pulmonary diseases are at increased risk for perioperative pulmonary complications. In the recent past more emphasis was placed on preoperative optimization of the underlying pulmonary diseases like COPD or Asthma bronchiale. The knowledge of pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment options in this special subset of patients is essential. It has been shown that preventive programs in the preoperative setting were able to reduce pulmonary complications., Competing Interests: Interessenkonflikt: Mutlak: keineGrünewaldt: Roche, GSK, Novartis, Boehringer, TNI, Leti, Astra zenica, TEVA, (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)